51 Comments - Jimmy CrackCorn - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 9:31 am: The stock photo of clean-cut, friendly, young Latinos was an interesting pick in contrast to the fear mongering. Implied message: Their coming for our Abercrombie & Fitch modeling jobs? - wordslinger - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 9:32 am: –Many believe the law is designed to create a permanent Democrat majority in Illinois using young Hispanic voters.– If it were from any other source, I would assume it’s a gag. It doesn’t make any sense Cue Chopper Jim, Hispanic 17 year olds pouring into Soldier Field…. - reflector - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 9:33 am: Right on Rich.If you want the votes present a good program. - Anon - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 9:34 am: Rich, this is why I read capfax. Calling out the total BS regardless of side. This is just ridiculous. Maybe it would increase hispanic participation in primaries? Mainly Democratic primaries? Who are the “many” that believe this? - Downstate GOP Faithless - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 9:36 am: Because if the uber right actually tried to compete, they wouldn’t have time to complain…and after all, isn’t that what’s really important? The ability to make a living by pointing why the other guys are wrong instead of why you’re right? - Skeptic - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 9:36 am: How is the “more than a third are between 18 and 29″ statistic even related? I don’t get it. If they’re 18 or over, this doesn’t apply to them anyway. Isn’t the number of 17 year olds (Hispanic or not) what’s important? Or maybe the proportion of Hispanic 17 year olds to non-Hispanic 17 year olds? Sounds like a classic non sequitor argument to me. - the Patriot - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 9:40 am: No on a conspiracy theory. I think this is just a way for Dems to pander to more people at a younger age. The reality is IL will be Democrat until we are broke our finances taken over by the federal government. Once you get them hooked on the government, they will never vote republican again. Well more than 50% are hooked on government in IL, and until we are so broke that a bunch of them get kicked off we ain’t goin republican. Everyone hated Blago and re-elected him. Everyone knew Quinn was an incompetent bafoon and we re-elected him. If JFK ran as a republican in IL, he would lose! - train111 - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 9:41 am: Actually having a program to reach out to Hispanic voters would require the IR crowd to think beyond the latest 30 second Fox News talking point and tht would require too much work. - Endangered Moderate Species - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 9:47 am: I am beginning to believe the ILGOP will not be able to separate itself from the paranoia of the far right. They continue to paddle against the wave of change and the times we live in. It is difficult for a leader of “all the people” to break out of their party. - hisgirlfriday - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 9:47 am: Can I start a conspiracy theory that the Illinois Review was designed to create a permanent Democrat majority in Illinois? Just look at the Illinois GOP since 2005. Coincidence? - low level - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 9:53 am: “why not start competing for those votes instead of complaining?” — that’s too difficult for them, Rich. You can always count on the IR and the Repub Party to always do the conservative, manning up, responsible thing and moan, complain and cry when they don’t get their way!! - wordslinger - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 9:54 am: –Once you get them hooked on the government, they will never vote republican again.– That must be news to all those Republican members howling about state facility closings in their districts. How does voting get you “hooked on government,” anyway? - Apple - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 9:57 am: Don’t forget this had broad, bi-partisan support. - low level - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:05 am: wordslinger- or how about the TARP program, originally designed to help homeowners under water but instead went to payoff big banks that made bad bets on mortgage securities? I don’t think you would find many of the executives of those institutions on any progressive candidate’s fundraising call list! That’s some “hooked on government” - maybe call it “bailout crack”?? - low level - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:08 am: “Many believe the law is designed to create a permanent Democrat majority in Illinois using young Hispanic voters.” I guess these voters don’t have good, moral character? Maybe the IR can fill us in on some of the details we seem to be missing. - John A Logan - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:08 am: Is my calendar off? Is it April Fools day? Is this a story from the Onion? I guess this stuff resonates in the echo chamber, but sheesh. - Cincinnatus - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:11 am: Insert Osewgo Willy “MY Party” comment here… - wordslinger - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:11 am: –I don’t think you would find many of the executives of those institutions on any progressive candidate’s fundraising call list!– I’m pretty sure you would, except for the Elizabeth Warren’s of the world. No reason not to buy everyone when they come so cheap. Just a cost of doing business. - Allen Skillicorn - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:12 am: I’m not for this bill, but it has NOTHING to do with Latino’s. The connection is absurd. Anyway the voter turnout of 17 year olds will be miniscule. - PublicServant - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:14 am: Oh brother! @the Patriot === I think this is just a way for Dems to pander to more people at a younger age. === By pandering, I’m assuming you mean actually advocating and pushing for laws that provide a helping hand for them. === Once you get them hooked on the government, they will never vote republican again. === Those darn Takers! @Word === That must be news to all those Republican members howling about state facility closings in their districts. == Those darn Takers! LOL! Rich, the views/fears of “the Patriot” and Illinois Review coincide, and THAT is the reason that Republicans, regardless of their mad scramble to “support” immigration reform, will find it difficult, if not impossible, to ever get behind a just immigration bill. - Grandson of Man - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:19 am: “How about just getting out there with a winning message?” Amen. “Once you get them hooked on government” That’s condescending. Many African Americans and Hispanics (and others) work but either can’t afford health insurance or it’s not offered to them. These people enable employers to profit through their affordable labor costs, and consumers to benefit through lower prices that employers charge due to their affordable labor costs. When was the last time you turned away a deal or paid more for something due to principle, so that you don’t enable the welfare state……? That’s what I thought. - Oswego Willy - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:21 am: ===Cue Chopper Jim, Hispanic 17 year olds pouring into Soldier Field….=== I burned my nostrils! To the Post, and that point, If they are voting in the Primary, are all these “17 year-olds” going to, in unison, and of course, orchestrated, go and vote and destroy the Electoral Process, because Mom didn’t give birth in January or February, but gave birht in May? Heck, the opportunity, to get “new” voters that are eligible to vote in the General, but NOT the Primary, and isolate them is a GREAT opportuinity to target a finite number of new voters, and try to make a difference in that subgroup, and what would be event BETTER? Vote them in the Primary at the age of 17! Do 17 Year Olds like “Politcal” ice cream, or “Governmental” ice cream? Maybe an Ice Cream Social at Soldier Field? A 17 year-old, who will …WILL… be eligible to vote in November is not a “Conspriacy Theory”, it’s an opportunity to find new voters, unless you just raise your hands … “They just will vote Democrat!”, “Think of how many 17 year-olds will corrupt the Process” “Having those 17 year-olds vote in the Primary for their options in the General Election, when they are 18 years old, does not sound fair to the democratic process of elections.” Yikes! - reformer - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:26 am: This bill would have at best a marginal impact on turnout in PRIMARY elections. How in the world would that help Democrats beat Republicans in the general? The sad truth is that contemporary conservatives have become knee-jerk opponents of any measures that would make it easier to vote. Almost all House Republicans, for example, voted three years ago against “no-excuse” absentee voting, so citizens can vote by mail without having to list a reason for so doing. - Oswego Willy - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:27 am: ===Insert Osewgo Willy “MY Party” comment here… === I have to “own” it, to “fix” it - Cincinnatus -, I plan on sticking around to try and turn this, but to turn it, I have to “own” it, even the “bad, Dopey, ignorant, intolerant, and misguided” The “MY” is ownership and personal responsibility, and when My Party has factions acting Dopey, wearing Tin Foil Hats, and those “leading” the charge are oblivious as to “Why” they are being Dopey…they need to be given a different perspective, and by someone “owning” their” Dopiness to correct it. - In 630 - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:27 am: Who is this “many” they speak of and what is the best way to avoid them? - ZC - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:29 am: I suppose it’s true, if you consider that the US by one stusy now has one of the highest 18-24 non employment rates in the developed world, these kids aren’t getting hooked on the private sector. But the tiny germ of truth here is yes, it might be easier to register the kids at the age of 17. At that age they’re still more often in school and the teachers can encourage it, get them in the habit. By the time they’re 18 they’re usually out of school and … Who knows where. Some of them sitting on their parents’ couch hearing about how much the stock market is growing and home housing prices are recovering, two metrics that may be wholly irrelevant to them. - soccermom - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:33 am: Patriot - say what you will about Pat Quinn, but at least he knows how to spell “buffoon.” And here’s a question — all those farmers who accept government subsidies: Do they consistently vote Democratic? One more thing — JFK couldn’t win Illinois as a Republican? That might be because JFK was a Democrat. People voted for him because he said things they liked - -things that were aspirational, like “Let’s put a man on the moon.” He talked about increasing our national investment in science and education, rather than taking a hatchet to our national budget. And he presented voters with a clear and compelling vision. I like this bit from JFK’s convention speech, referring to his opponent: “His party is the party of the past. His speeches are generalities from Poor Richard’s Almanac. Their platform, made up of left-over Democratic planks, has the courage of our old convictions. Their pledge is a pledge to the status quo–and today there can be no status quo.” So yeah, if that guy ran in Illinois, I’d vote for him in a heartbeat. But I don’t think he’d run as a Republican. - Happy Returns - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:38 am: ” How does voting get you “hooked on government,” anyway?” VOTING. The other gateway drug. - reformer - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:40 am: Allan S So why do you oppose this bill, since you admit it’s not part of a conspiracy to entice young Latinos to defeat the GOP? - Cincinnatus - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:46 am: Wasn’t making fun of the “MY” stuff at all, OW, just saying that your comments about the lack of awareness of some in the ILGOP would fit into this thread well… - Lycurgus - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:47 am: What, Illinois’ election laws aren’t complicated enough that we need to add a tiered system of age eligibility? There’s a solution in search of a problem. - southwest - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:49 am: My seventeen year old is much more conservative than I am and I consider myself very conservative. More surprising, her twitter and facebook accounts with about 1500 friends and followers seem to be just as conservative as she. They actively discuss politics and government and this is in St. Clair County! She would be thrilled to vote in any election. - wordslinger - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:56 am: –I suppose it’s true, if you consider that the US by one stusy now has one of the highest 18-24 non employment rates in the developed world, these kids aren’t getting hooked on the private sector.– Those kids carrying those relatively high-interest student loans are going to be hooked on working and servicing that debt for a long time. Big money maker for the government. - Oswego Willy - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 10:58 am: - Cincinnatus -, Not even remotely taken badly on my end. Not at all. Much respect. Sometimes letting something like this “simmer” and the complete lack of awareness something like this breeds and then is “agreed to” that IR has this right is just unbelieveable. I took it as you intneded and clarified. All Good. - Boone's is Back - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 11:01 am: Maybe the IR would like to restrict the voting age to the AARP membership threshold level? - Anonymous - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 11:19 am: I’m more interested in the merits of the bill itself. What “problem” is it really trying to solve? Why is it necessary? Who wanted it in the first place? - walkinfool - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 11:40 am: Amazing how every tactic can be seen by the IR crowd as focusing on Hispanics. If voting means getting “hooked on government” then I’m all for it, regardless of which party’s primary is involved. This is supposed to be a government “by the people, for the people” isn’t it? - low level - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 11:44 am: “What “problem” is it really trying to solve?” –Funny you should ask. I’ve been asking the same question regarding this bill: http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocTypeID=HB&DocNum=976&GAID=12&SessionID=85&LegID=71342 As for the merits of if you will turn 18 by the time of the general election you should be allowed to vote in a primary if you are 17, just think about it a little. Maybe do some research. Look at the vote even. I’m sure you’ll figure it out. - Oswego Willy - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 11:56 am: My own personal experiece; I was able to vote in a Primary, with my birthday falling before a March Primary. I had friends in HS, who were 17, and in out Senior Government Class complaining that they were not allowed to vote in the Primary, but will be 18 in November and …well, is the issue of the Bill. I came home for thanksgiving break that November and met that same friend, who was also back from break and we just were talking about the Class and I asked, “So, how did you feel finally voting?” Response? “Even on the Campus, and the chance to register and all, I just didn’t vote”. Wether your 17 and a HALF, 18, 25, 55, or 105… if you are not motivated to vote, you won’t. I see why the Bill is being pushed, but I do not see it being pushed because of a “Conspiracy”, in regards to Primary Elections, concerning the vote(s) of 17 year-olds. But, I do hear “The Chopper” hovering over polling places… - Judgment Day - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 12:16 pm: “What, Illinois’ election laws aren’t complicated enough that we need to add a tiered system of age eligibility? There’s a solution in search of a problem.” Ok, simply - what is the position of the folks who have to handle the work? The IL County Clerks handle all the election work (except for the Election Commission areas of Illinois), so being they are the people who have to make it work, what is their take on this whole issue? Is this just no big deal or is it going to be a expensive and difficult pain to have to deal with? Ask the folks who have to handle the work. - reformer - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 12:20 pm: == a solution in search of a problem == Citizens from ages 18-24 have the lowest voting rate. This measure is a small tool to encourage voting, and start young people in the habit before they go off to college and voting takes more planning than the average 19-year old will make. - Keep Calm and Carry On - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 12:30 pm: The only way I can see this somehow harming the GOP is if an influx of left-leaning younger voters “infiltrate” them through our primary system and use that to somehow vote for a weaker GOP candidate. It’s a goofy idea, but young kids tend to be more receptive to goofiness than their wise elders. Even then, it wouldn’t likely amount to many votes. Other than that, I fail to see how this is a cause for concern. - Keep Calm and Carry On - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 12:31 pm: Do other states have this provision? Or would we be the only ones? - ArchPundit - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 12:33 pm: ===Is this just no big deal or is it going to be a expensive and difficult pain to have to deal with? ===Ask the folks who have to handle the work. It shouldn’t be too hard to change the birth date that is acceptable to register to vote in a primary. All it requires them to do is allow people who qualify to vote in November to vote in March. - ArchPundit - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 12:35 pm: ===This bill would have at best a marginal impact on turnout in PRIMARY elections. How in the world would that help Democrats beat Republicans in the general? Hispanics! Don’t you see? I don’t either nor does anyone with even a rudimentary grasp of logic, but this is the Illinois Review who is asserting the conspiracy so what do you expect? - Rich Miller - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 12:37 pm: ===Do other states have this provision?=== Yes. Lots. - ArchPundit - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 12:40 pm: ===Do other states have this provision? Other states have it. I’m fine with it in general, but it isn’t a huge deal–there’s always some arbitrary cut-off. http://www.fairvote.org/17-year-old-primary-voting-2#.UZZq7LXigRI “17-year-olds can vote in primaries and caucuses in nearly half of states States include: Alaska, Connecticut, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Virginia, Vermont, and Washington. Most have done this by state law, but others by changing rules in parties. In Alaska, Kansas, North Dakota and Washington, 17-year-old Democrats may caucus, but are barred from participating in the Republican caucus.” - reformer - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 12:46 pm: == Do other states have this provisionn? == “Nineteen other states allow 17-year-olds to vote. And on Monday, Takoma Park in Maryland became the first city in the United States to lower its voting age from 18 to 16. The Takoma Park law applies only to city elections.” http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2013/05/16/illinois-poised-to-lower-voting-age-to-17-latinos-growing-part-young-voters/#ixzz2TZb2wrc8 Iowa permits 17-year olds who will be 18 by the general election to participate in the presidential caucus. - Small Town Liberal - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 12:49 pm: - Once you get them hooked on the government, they will never vote republican again. - Pretty thinly veiled racism, pal. Are you asserting that another minority is “hooked” on the government and that’s why they tend to vote for Democrats? Eventually the GOP is going to need a new myth to sell, the days are numbered for that one. - Oswego Willy - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 12:51 pm: ===there’s always some arbitrary cut-off.=== I may be a bit off … but isn’t the General Election Day itself for each election … the, um … Cut off … - Keep Calm and Carry On - Friday, May 17, 13 @ 1:09 pm: Thanks for replying, Rich and reformer. Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.