Lang withdraws from gaming bill sponsorship
Tuesday, May 21, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Rockford Register Star reporter Isaac Guerrero heard last night (as did I) that Rep. Lou Lang had withdrawn his sponsorship from the gaming bill. The withdrawal was apparently no coincidence…
It was late Monday evening when I learned of this turn of events. Hours earlier I had asked Rockford City Legal Director Patrick Hayes if there was any connection between Rockford’s inclusion in the gaming bill and the city’s employment of the law firm that Lang works for.
Lang is of counsel at Odelson and Sterk, which the city hired last summer to handle some of its worker’s compensation legal matters. The city actually hired two firms to do the work, Odelson and Sterk based in Evergreen Park and Heyl Royster based here in Rockford.
Hayes said there’s no connection between the city’s casino bid and the City Council’s decision last year to hire Odelson and Sterk. Moreover, Hayes said, Lang doesn’t handle any of the city’s worker’s compensation matters. That work is handled by two of Odelson and Sterk’s other attorneys – Michael Stillman and Burt Odelson.
Eight law firms submitted bids last year to provide the city legal representation with respect to worker’s compensation matters. Odelson and Sterk, Hayes told me, did not submit the lowest bid. But when it comes to certain professional services, especially legal services, qualifications, experience and performance of the bidder are often more important to the city than lowest cost. That was the case with this bid, Hayes said.
* The Sun-Times followed up…
Lang also defended the timing to withdraw as sponsor of the gambling bill, even though the connection Odelson and Sterk had with Rockford dated back to last summer.
“This is the time I felt was appropriate. I think you know that in all the legislation I’ve ever had in gaming going back 20 years, I’ve had Rockford in the bill. There’s nothing new here,” Lang said.
Lang didn’t waver when pressed why he didn’t object to the decision by the law firm that employs him to solicit business from a town covered by his gambling-expansion legislation.
“I have violated no ethical rules, and so I’ll send you this piece of paper,” he said, referring to the letter to Madigan, announcing his recusal from the legislation. “I don’t want to discuss it further. That’s my public comment.”
* Lang’s withdrawal letter…
It was recently brought to my attention that there may be a perceived conflict of interest between the law firm of which I am of counsel and my sponsorship of the gaming bill because a client of the firm has an interest that could be impacted by the passage of the proposed legislation.
To be clear, the law firm’s work for the client has no relation whatsoever to any gaming legislation. Additionally, I do no legal work for this client, and I receive no compensation from their relationship with the firm. My actions as an attorney and/or a member of the General Assembly have been, at every moment, completely appropriate and totally respectful of all applicable laws and ethical rules. There have been no violations of any kind.
Lang has, indeed, supported a Rockford casino for a very long time. And “of counsel” means he’s not a partner in the firm, so, as he said, he didn’t share in any profits.
But with all the heat on this bill (some of it contrived, some of it legit), withdrawal was a wise move.
Rep. Bob Rita is the new sponsor.
16 Comments
|
Rauner claims more money and more “likes”
Tuesday, May 21, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From the Bruce Rauner Exploratory Committee…
Last week marked the halfway point of the second quarter fundraising period, and I wanted to make sure you have the latest information about the Exploratory Committee’s efforts. Since April 1, we have raised more than $470,000, bringing our total fundraising haul since announcing the formation of the Exploratory Committee 11 weeks ago to more than $1.75 million.
For perspective, you should know that we significantly outraised all the potential Republican and Democratic candidates in the First Quarter, despite starting two months after everyone else. So far in the Second Quarter, we have brought in roughly quadruple the amount raised by all the other potential candidates combined.
He’s raising big bucks for sure.
* But check this out…
One more positive development is that we passed 11,000 people “Liking” Bruce’s Facebook page. That means we already have a bigger online presence than Governor Pat Quinn as well as potential Democratic candidate Lisa Madigan.
Considering that Quinn and LMadigan haven’t amped up their online presence and don’t seem to be buying ads pushing people to their Facebook pages, I’m not sure how this means anything.
But maybe you can help me sort it out.
83 Comments
|
Unclear on the concept
Tuesday, May 21, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Rep. Monique Davis (D-Chicago) in the Sun-Times…
Asked if the same-sex marriage is a civil rights issue, Davis didn’t bat an eye.
“Have they ever hung from trees?” she asked. “Were they ever slaves for 500 years, then I don’t think so. I don’t think [the issues are] equal … Simple as that.”
Ugh.
* It wasn’t all that long ago in Illinois that gay people could be sent to prison just for having sex with their partners. If you want a look at the history of violence against gays, click here. And, then, of course, there’s this…
If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.
There is a real reluctance among African-Americans to equate gay rights to the struggle for freedom by blacks. I get that. But there is absolutely no denying that there has been institutional prejudice against gay people in this country. OK, they weren’t slaves here, but how does that make their struggle for “civil” rights somehow unimportant?
67 Comments
|
* The House Executive Committee met in Room 114 today, which is large, but cannot possibly hold a “massive” number of people. Just sayin…
A bill to allow, but regulate, horizontal hydraulic fracturing in Illinois sailed through a House committee Tuesday morning in a unanimous vote amid chants of “shame” from a massive opposition group of activists and residents who packed the hearing.
Some videos are here.
The bill passed the committee 11-0.
It now moves to the floor, where passage is expected.
12 Comments
|
Question of the day
Tuesday, May 21, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Tribune…
[Gov. Pat Quinn] also broached the issue of state taxation of retirement income. Noting a Tribune editorial that said ending the tax exemption for retirement income should be looked at, Quinn said: “I feel the same way.”
“I think any kind of review should be comprehensive and should cover anything, including reducing taxes,” Quinn said later. “If there’s ever a discussion on subjects involving tax and revenue, I think everybody should look at everything.”
* The Question: Should Illinois tax retirement income? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
panel management
99 Comments
|
* The governor’s office called today to say that this Sun-Times piece (which I quoted in the subscriber version earlier today) isn’t accurate…
Gov. Pat Quinn on Monday said if Chicago is to have its own casino, the Illinois Gaming Board must have “supreme” authority over it, rather than ceding power to the city.
Citing the Hired Truck scandal, Quinn said in a Chicago Sun-Times Editorial Board interview that Chicago doesn’t have the best track record: “things don’t go so well when the city is running things.” […]
In remarks to the board, Quinn said negotiations are ongoing on the bill’s language but he would insist that the gaming board has the final word. That includes clarifying language that would allow the gaming board to revoke the City’s casino license if necessary.
“Understanding the city’s casino would be municipally-owned, I do believe that the gaming board authority must be supreme,” Quinn said. “The gaming board has to be the umpire. The final judge. I think that’s imperative.”
Asked if it were a must for his signature on legislation pending in the Illinois House, Quinn responded: “It has been from day one.”
* Not true.
The governor’s office says Quinn is fine with the current language regarding the regulation of the casino operator, which wouldn’t put the city’s license at risk. Instead, it would allow the Gaming Board to get rid of the private operator hired by the city if there any problems. The casino can’t legally function without the operator, so whacking the operator would shut down the whole thing. The Gaming Board will also be allowed to remove members of the city’s oversight board under the current proposal.
This finally puts a little daylight between Quinn and Gaming Board Chairman Aaron Jaffe, who has demanded the right to revoke Chicago’s license, even though he’ll have the ability to shut down the casino under this proposal.
* The response from Mayor Emanuel’s office to the Sun-Times story wouldn’t have been necessary if the two sides had been communicating with each other...
“As Governor Quinn knows very well, there is the potential for corruption at all levels of Government which is why we agree that the Gaming Board should have maximum oversight over all gaming in Illinois. However, there is also a not so proud history in Illinois where Governors have attempted to manipulate and influence the gaming board for corrupt purposes. We cannot expose the taxpayers of Chicago to such risk. That is why the appropriate remedy is to grant the gaming board the authority to revoke the license of an operator of a Chicago casino which would effectively shut down its operations. Furthermore, the gaming board also has the ability to remove the Chicago Casino Authority’s Board as well as its Executive Director, all appropriate powers for a state regulator.”
Quinn said yesterday that he and Emanuel haven’t spoken for ten days. Sheesh, man, the end of session is nigh and that’s no way to run a state, or a city.
Get it together, people.
13 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Today’s quote
Tuesday, May 21, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From former President Bill Clinton…
Our nation’s permanent mission is to form a ‘more perfect union’ - deepening the meaning of freedom, broadening the reach of opportunity, strengthening the bonds of community. That mission has inspired and empowered us to extend rights to people previously denied them. Every time we have done that, it has strengthened our nation.
Now we should do it again, in Illinois, with marriage equality. Since the days of Abraham Lincoln, Illinois has stood for the proposition that all citizens should be treated equally under the law. Lincoln himself came to Springfield in search of opportunity, and he dedicated his life to securing equal opportunity for all citizens. I believe that for Illinois and for our nation as a whole, in the 21st century that must include marriage equality.
Discuss.
14 Comments
|
Expect a floor vote soon
Tuesday, May 21, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Back in January, the Connecticut State Police released this description of the guns used in the Sandy Hook school massacre…
Seized inside the school:
Seized from suspect’s car in parking lot:
#4. Izhmash Canta-12 12 gauge Shotgun (seized from car in parking lot)
The shooter used the Bushmaster .223 to murder 20 children and six adults inside the school; he used a handgun to take his own life inside the school. No other weapons were used in this crime.
Let’s keep these facts in mind as we consider the Senate bill to ban gun magazines that can hold over ten rounds.
* As I see it, the ban on purchasing those magazines has a real problem with enforcement. Magazines have no serial numbers, so they can’t be easily traced. Without receipts and a very robust investigation, it would be tough to pinpoint when or where a magazine was purchased.
Even so, there’s a good argument to make for limiting the size of these magazines…
Nicole Hockley, told the committee that in her 6-year-old son Dylan’s class, 11 children escaped while the shooter was reloading a high-capacity magazine, and even more lives could have been saved if more reloading had been necessary.
“What happened in Newtown can happen anywhere,” Hockley said. “It can happen in Illinois.”
* More…
“All of those lives were taken in less than four minutes by a single gunman,” Barden said, adding that the shooter “made a conscious decision” that day by bringing multiple 30-round, high-ammunition magazines and leaving the smaller ones at home. “He knew he could kill a lot more people. And he did.”
If the Newtown gunman had been limited to smaller ammunition magazines, he would not have been able to spray 154 bullets in such a short time frame, said Barden,
* From Hockley’s opening remarks…
“As part of Sandy Hook Promise, I think it’s important that you know we’re not just a gun-control group. We’re not gun lobbyists. Sandy Hook Promise actually looks at holistic solutions and common-sense solutions for all the causes of gun-violence. So, we look very closely at school security and school safety, how we strengthen and build communities, support parenting - good parenting, and also mental health legislation.
“And in fact, one of the other parents and members of Sandy Hook Promise was in Hartford today proposing a new mental health bill for Connecticut that she helped co-author. So I just - I kind of want to position that we are not a gun-control group. We are a common-sense solutions group. But here today, in Illinois, the topic of the day and the topic that we’re discussing is Senate Bill 1002 to limit the purchase and sale of high-capacity magazines that have more than 10 bullets.
* Two Republicans supported the bill in committee yesterday…
Senate Minority Leader Christine Radogno and Palatine Republican Sen. Matt Murphy voted in favor of the measure.
Murphy said that hearing from the parents [of the slain Newtown children] had an emotional affect, but he is trying to keep a level head on the issue.
“We do need to try to legislate in a way that is reasoned. You don’t want to be devoid of emotion, but you don’t want it to control you either,” he said. “This is not a be all end all solution to these circumstances, but the opportunity that a smaller capacity provides for lives to be saved, while maybe unlikely, I think exists. I think there is a chance that this bill could save lives, and I think it’s worth taking that chance.”
* But there was serious opposition…
Jay Keller, a representative of the Illinois Firearm Manufacturers Association, said there are 65 gun-makers in the state, with 8,500 employees. Some of them will consider leaving if the bill passes, Keller said.
Senate President John Cullerton, a Chicago Democrat, told Keller the manufacturers wouldn’t lose much business because they still could sell such magazines to residents of other states.
Sen. Matt Murphy, R-Palatine, said he understands if gun manufacturers in Illinois feel they’re “under seige,” but added: “I think there’s a chance that this bill could save lives, and I think it’s worth taking that chance.”
And…
Todd Vandermyde, Illinois lobbyist for the National Rifle Association, showed committee members a photo he said depicted Chicago police officers holding semi-automatic AR-15s to guard the home of a slain colleague and said the Illinois governor’s security detail is issued handguns outfitted for magazines of more than 10 rounds.
“If it’s good enough to protect their lives, and it’s good enough for them for the protection of their families, then why is my family worth any less?” Vandermyde asked. “I’m on the road as much as all of you are, away from home, and these are exactly the types of tools that I leave in the hands of my family to protect themselves.”
And…
Keller said another client, the Motion Picture Association of America, would no longer oppose the bill now that Kotowski had amended it to exempt the use of the magazines in filming movies.
That led to a curt exchange between Kotowski and Sen. Dale Righter, a Mattoon Republican. Righter asked if Kotowski believed violent movies contributed to societal violence. Kotowski said there were a number of cultural factors that contributed.
So Righter asked the reason for the movie carve-out, and when Kotowski said it was because movie actors use blanks, Righter, attempting to stress that movie violence looks real, said, “I would hope they’re not using live-round ammunition in movies, senator, and I’m assuming that the actors who fall over are not really dead.”
134 Comments
|
* The pension reform standoff between House Speaker Michael Madigan and Senate President John Cullerton isn’t getting any less standoffish. Greg Hinz has quotes from each side on each others’ bills…
“We’re not going to put up that bill for a vote just for it to fail,” said Mr. Cullerton’s spokewoman Rikeesha Phelon, referring to a measure sponsored by Mr. Madigan that’s awaiting a Senate vote. “I think that would be viewed as a setback for reform.”
“(The Cullerton bill) is in the Rules Committee. There’s nothing to call,” said Steve Brown, Mr. Madigan’s spokesman. “The speaker has expressed a preference for (his bill). He thinks that’s the best course of action.”
* And Gov. Pat Quinn is attempting to send a message that he doesn’t like Senate President Cullerton’s bill, without actually coming right out and saying so, despite the best efforts of the Tribune editorial page…
He did offer that, “It’s short of what is needed.” When we pushed him on the veto question, about all he’d say is, “I don’t want to have an incomplete bill arrive” from the General Assembly. […]
He wouldn’t countenance the possibility of extending the session past May 31. “We’ve got to get it done,” meaning now, he told us. “I don’t want people thinking we ought to temporize some more.”
* The markets, however, seem optimistic…
Illinois debt is rallying the most since 2011 as investors bet lawmakers will end two decades of inaction and pass a measure to fix the worst-funded U.S. state pension system. […]
Taxable Illinois pension-obligation bonds maturing in June 2033 yielded 2.29 percentage points more than benchmark Treasuries May 13, four days after the Senate bill was approved, data compiled by Bloomberg show. That’s the smallest penalty since August 2011, when Standard & Poor’s rated the state two steps higher than its current A- grade.
But…
“I would think they get a compromise this time — the market will be pretty disappointed if they don’t,” said Tim McGregor, who oversees about $30 billion as director of municipal fixed-income at Northern Trust Corp. in Chicago. “Spreads have rallied in on the news, and they could widen pretty quickly if they don’t come to terms with anything.”
Discuss.
31 Comments
|
* Ken Griffin will never be satisfied…
While the hedge fund manager said he supported Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel when he ran for office in 2011 because he was “the best man for the job,” Mr. Griffin said Mr. Emanuel hasn’t done enough to address these problems.
“We will see in his next two years, does he have the strength of will and the moral fortitude to do what must be done — the early returns are lackluster,” Mr. Griffin said in addressing hundreds of Chicago’s business leaders last night for a meeting of the Economic Club of Chicago. “I’ll say it as it is: I’m good friends with our mayor, I think the world of him, he is as bright as they come — but he’s got to step up and really deal with the problems we have in our city.”
Mr. Griffin, a Republican who is serving on the campaign exploratory committee for Republican gubernatorial hopeful and financier Bruce Rauner, dismissed the civic debate over whether the city should shutter 50- some Chicago schools and said the mayor should be closing twice as many.
He also criticized Mr. Emanuel over how he settled last fall’s strike by the Chicago Teachers Union, saying the longer school day came at an increased cost for teachers’ salaries “that we just can’t afford.”
Close twice as many schools? Protests are popping up all over as it is. The mayor’s approval rating is plummeting, as Chicagoans resist the school closures, yet Griffin wants more.
* This is the same Ken Griffin who backed Barack Obama for president, then turned against him. It’s kinda become a habit. Griffin currently backs Bruce Rauner for governor. I’d watch my back if I was Rauner.
* A Tribune reporter asked Griffin last year whether he believed “the ultrawealthy have an inordinate or inappropriate amount of influence on the political process.” His response…
I think they actually have an insufficient influence.
And he makes that clear just about every time he appears in public.
48 Comments
|
[The following is a paid advertisement.]
Before you vote on SB9 Veto override learn the facts:
• Smart Grid Bill Resulting in a $6 a Month Increase for ComEd customers! When promoting SB1652 in 2011, ComEd said customers would only see a $3 a month increase.
• SB 9 Will Add $42 Million to ComEd’s $311 Million, or 15% Rate Increase! Senate Bill 9 is undeniably another electric rate increase for ComEd consumers.
• ComEd is Not Keeping Promises! ComEd promised spending on storm hardening down more than 50% in 2013.
“Proposed law would mean pension help for ComEd, higher rates for consumers” – Crain’s Chicago Business 2/18/13
AARP urges Legislators to protect Illinois consumers
Vote NO and Uphold Veto on SB9!
Comments Off
|
Comments Off
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|