* From a press release…
LISA MADIGAN ANNOUNCES REELECTION BID
Chicago – Lisa Madigan today announced her campaign for reelection as Illinois Attorney General. In seeking her fourth term, Madigan will build on an extraordinary record of accomplishment in protecting consumers, generating critical revenue for the state, safeguarding communities, and fighting for open and accountable government.
Since taking office in 2003, Madigan has established herself as a national leader in protecting consumers. Throughout the home foreclosure crisis that devastated the nation’s economy, Madigan has fought to hold lenders accountable for their financial misconduct and to provide assistance to struggling Illinois families and communities. Her efforts have resulted in over $2 billion in relief for homeowners in Illinois. Madigan also has consistently fought against unfair utility rates, obtaining over $1 billion in relief for electricity consumers.
In a time of fiscal crisis, Madigan’s office has generated over $9 billion for the state. Her work has included partnering with the Department of Revenue to lead a multi-year enforcement initiative that has collected over $82 million from gasoline station owners and operators who have evaded sales taxes.
Madigan has led statewide efforts to curb the manufacture, sale and use of methamphetamine, drafting new laws to address this deadly drug, training law enforcement and prosecutors, and prosecuting meth conspiracy cases. With the rise of synthetic drug use in recent years, Madigan put Illinois at the forefront of this fight by launching a successful initiative to get synthetic drugs out of retail stores and drafting a new law to crack down on sales of these drugs.
As part of her extensive work to protect women and children from sexual assault, Madigan drafted and negotiated a law requiring the testing of DNA evidence collected in sexual assault investigations, making Illinois the first state in the nation with this mandate. Madigan also has drafted laws to require lifetime supervision for the most dangerous sex offenders and to improve the state’s Sex Offender Registry. Additionally, Madigan leads the Illinois Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force and has undertaken a successful initiative to identify, track and apprehend the most prolific child pornography offenders.
As Attorney General, Madigan has created new tools to fight for government transparency and accountability. She created the first-ever Public Access Counselor in the office and worked with open government advocates to spearhead successful legislative efforts to strengthen the state’s sunshine laws. She also has taken criminal and civil actions against government misconduct and fraud, successfully prosecuting public officials and minority contracting fraud.
In her fourth term, Madigan will continue her successful record of advocacy on behalf of the people of Illinois.
Statement from Lisa Madigan on her decision to seek reelection as Attorney General:
“For the last several months, I have considered the best way to continue serving the people of Illinois. Deciding whether to seek reelection or to run for Governor has not been easy. I love my job as Attorney General and continue to be excited about the important work we are doing and what we can do for people and families in the years ahead. I considered running for Governor because of the need for effective management from that office and the frustration so many of us feel about the current lack of progress on critical issues facing Illinois.
Ultimately, however, there has always been another consideration that impacts my decision. I feel strongly that the state would not be well served by having a Governor and Speaker of the House from the same family and have never planned to run for Governor if that would be the case. With Speaker Madigan planning to continue in office, I will not run for Governor.
I have been honored to have so many people across Illinois voice their support for me as I considered this decision. I look forward to continuing to fight for everyone in Illinois as Attorney General.” [Emphasis added.]
Blaming it on the dad. Wow.
…Adding… From late last month…
Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan doesn’t believe her father, Speaker of the House Michael Madigan, would have to step down if she makes a run for governor.
Madigan, after serving on a panel Thursday hosted by the influential Emily’s List at Willis Tower, was unequivocal when posed the question now being constantly raised. “He wouldn’t have to. He wouldn’t have to step down,” she retorted to a reporter, emphasizing the move would not be a requirement.
Something obviously changed.
…Adding more… AG Madigan’s people are strongly objecting to the use of the term “blamed.” I’m being told that there is no blame here, she’s just stating the facts as they are. The father won’t step down, so she’s not running.
…Adding even more… The AG finally sent a quick e-mail to her campaign supporters at 7 o’clock tonight. It was basically just the press release.
…More… Bill Daley…
Daley: “Voters now have a clear choice between a proven leader who gets things done and a governor who can’t seem to get anything done.”
160 Comments
|
Question of the day
Monday, Jul 15, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* We talked about the Speaker Madigan and Metra stories last week.
* The Question: Should all Illinois politicians be legally barred from recommending any sort of employment conditions for anyone?
[For some reason, the poll wasn’t working. So, just answer in comments. Sorry.]
70 Comments
|
Dillard formally kicks off campaign
Monday, Jul 15, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Sen. Kirk Dillard kicks off his gubernatorial campaign today…
Once again, Dillard, who served as chief of staff to Gov. Jim Edgar, will have Edgar on his side. Dillard’s two-day announcement tour — which does not include a stop in Springfield — does include one Monday afternoon with Edgar at the Governor Oglesby Mansion in Decatur.
Why skip the capital city?
“Decatur is an ancestral home for my wife’s family and is a quintessential downstate large city,” he said, noting it is between Champaign-Urbana and Springfield.
More from Bernie…
Dillard earlier this year talked about how it would be good to have a first family back in the mansion. He has daughters ages 12 and 10, and I asked last week if he expects they would go to school in Springfield if he is elected
“We’ll cross that bridge when we get there,” he said. “If I get elected, we will figure out to what extent the children full-time reside in Springfield.”
* AP…
It’s the second bid for the post for Dillard, of DuPage County, who lost to Brady in the 2010 Republican primary by only 193 votes. But he pins that loss on moderate, suburban votes being split among several candidates from the same area — himself, former GOP Chair Andy McKenna and former Attorney General Jim Ryan.
Dillard said the state Republican Party risks repeating the same mistakes it made in 2010, with a crowded field and, so far, no consensus candidate.
“It is unbelievable that the Republican Party, and to some extent the business community, learned nothing from the 2010 gubernatorial primary, which resulted in a 67 percent income tax (increase) and Democrat domination” through the political redistricting process in 2010 that was controlled by the Democrats, he said.
I think the business community may be learning by coalescing behind Bruce Rauner. We’ll see.
* Announcement press release…
Illinois State Senator Kirk Dillard announces campaign for governor
Two-day state fly-around underscores Dillard’s leadership, record
WHO: State Senator Kirk Dillard, his wife Stephanie, their two daughters, extended family and supporters.
WHAT: Senator Dillard kicks off his 2014 campaign for Illinois Governor
WHEN: Monday and Tuesday, July 15 & 16
Monday’s Schedule
10:15 a.m. 3753 Magnolia, Chicago, IL (Sen. Dillard’s first boyhood home)
1:05 p.m. Quad Cities International Airport, 2200 69th Ave., Moline, IL
4:50 p.m. Governor Oglesby Mansion Inc., 421 W. William St., Decatur, IL (with former Gov. Jim Edgar)
Tuesday’s Schedule
10:00 a.m. Byerly Aviation, 6100 West E. M. Dirksen Pkway, Peoria, IL
12:20 p.m. 17th Street Bar & Grill, North 17th Street, Murphysboro, IL
4:45 p.m. Emery Air, 1 Airport Circle, Rockford, IL 61109
7:15 p.m. Rally with supporters - Trademark Tavern & Tap, 777 E. Butterfield Road, Lombard, IL 60148
WHY: Illinois is a great state, rich in our people and resources. We need strong leadership to renew our faith, re-imagine our possibilities and re-purpose our resolve in returning Illinois to its rightful place as the Capital of the Midwest. Senator Dillard is uniquely qualified to provide that leadership and Make Illinois Work Again.
* Twitters…
Your advice?
54 Comments
|
Show me the names
Monday, Jul 15, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From the Twitters…
The link leads to yet another story about more talk of a Downstate Democrat running for governor, without any clue as to who might ultimately be that candidate…
In preliminary discussions, among the potential names mentioned as a 2014 candidate is state Sen. Michael Frerichs, a Champaign Democrat, who’s preparing a bid for state treasurer. Phelps, who raised his profile during the guns debate, said he isn’t interested in higher office right now but didn’t fully rule out the possibility.
Lt. Gov. Sheila Simon, a Carbondale resident who showed she can win statewide support, says she’s seeking higher office, but most likely comptroller or attorney general. Her decision may rest on whether Madigan ultimately decides to run for governor.
State Sen. John Sullivan of Rushville, the assistant Senate majority leader, says he’s been asked about the possibility of a candidacy but wants to stay where he is.
“There’s been a little bit of discussion on that subject,” he said. “The gun issue has heightened that discussion.”
* Until I see a name, this is little more than a Downstate temper tantrum.
Look, petitions start going out in less than two months. A candidate would have to immediately set up a very big campaign network and raise tons of money. Running for governor ain’t easy. It’s a complicated process in a very large state.
* Related…
* Quinn to East St. Louis to announce last phase of bridge work
* Quinn says his organizing skills will lead him to re-election
* Meet Doug Truax, Dick Durbin’s potential 2014 opponent
* Johnson campaign committee changes name: The Urbana Republican’s campaign fund had been called “Friends of Tim Johnson.” Now it is known as “Middle Ground PAC,” and is listed as a leadership political action committee.
16 Comments
|
Illinois Zimmerman verdict react and etc.
Monday, Jul 15, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a Bill Daley press release…
“The Zimmerman case underscores my concerns about the new Illinois concealed carry law. Local communities have to have a say in how we keep more people from walking around with guns, creating situations that can easily lead to tragedies like this.”
* From Gov. Pat Quinn’s Sunday appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union”
CROWLEY: Thank you. Governor Quinn let me — I’m going to give you a chance to respond to Governor Perry on trying to get jobs out of Illinois and into Texas. But first, I do want to talk to you about the Zimmerman verdict. You have seen that in your state there are demonstrations in Chicago and perhaps elsewhere. This is also a city that’s no stranger to gun violence. Is there a national implication to this verdict?
QUINN: Well, I think there is. It’s a tragic episode. I agree with Trayvon Martin’s father that his heart is broken. My heart is broken. And our faith is not broken, as Mr. Martin said. It’s important that we really look at this stand your ground law. I don’t think that’s a good law. We don’t have it in Illinois, and we don’t want it. And I think also the idea of individuals with guns that are concealed that are told by the police not to do something, violating that police order, there’s something really wrong when that happens. And I think lots and lots of people across our country feel that way.
CROWLEY: And a lot has been said, though, about the justice system and that it seems to many people sort of innately racially divided from whether someone is charged all the way through the verdict. Do you think that the American justice system is innately racist?
QUINN: Well, I sure hope not. The American way is colorblind. And you know, Dr. King 50 years ago on August 28th of 1963 talked about that goal of all of us to have a colorblind society and if our justice system needs improvement we must together, all of us, Americans, work together to straighten that out.
[Durbin react deleted because I didn’t realize the story was a year old.]
I didn’t see any major local GOP react. I’ll post if/when that happens.
* Stateline…
The case centered around whether Zimmerman acted in self defense and drew national attention to Florida’s law, which allows people to defend themselves with force if they feel threatened in their home, business, car, or a place where they “have a legal right to be.” At least 21 states have a similar law, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
While Zimmerman did not ultimately use the “stand your ground” defense in his case, Sanford police did not arrest him until almost two months after the shooting because of the Florida stand your ground rules that require police to have specific evidence to refute a self defense claim in order to arrest someone claiming self defense.
* From a 2012 study of state “Stand Your Ground” laws cited in that Stateline story…
Despite the implications that these laws may have for public safety, there has been little empirical investigation of their impact on crime and victimization. In this paper, we use monthly data from the U.S. Vital Statistics to examine how Stand Your Ground laws affect homicides and firearm injuries. We identify the impact of these laws by exploiting variation in the effective date of these laws across states over time.
Our results indicate that Stand Your Ground laws are associated with a significant increase in the number of homicides among whites, especially white males. According to our estimates, between 28 and 33 additional white males are killed each month as a result of these laws. We find no consistent evidence to suggest that these laws increase homicides among blacks.
* Eric Zorn…
It’s pretty clear jurors didn’t buy the idea suggested by prosecutors that Zimmerman actively pursued Martin, confronted him, provoked the fight that he was winning at the time the fatal shot was fired and then made up a bunch of lies to justify what he did.
Please take a deep breath before commenting. No drive-by sloganeering. Hold your tempers in check. Thanks.
82 Comments
|
The people are with him (continued)
Monday, Jul 15, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The rest of my weekly newspaper column…
One of the biggest issues Quinn harped on earlier this month when he used his amendatory veto powers to rewrite the concealed carry bill was that “guns and alcohol don’t mix.” So his veto prohibited all concealed carrying in any restaurant which also served alcohol.
“Do you think trained and licensed Illinois citizens should be able to carry concealed, loaded handguns into restaurants that serve alcohol?” respondents were asked in a Capitol Fax/We Ask America poll taken July 10.
An overwhelming 70 percent said “No.” Just 26 percent said “Yes” and only 4 percent were uncertain.
A whopping 83 percent of Chicagoans were opposed, 77 percent of suburban Cook County residents and 73 percent of collar county residents also were opposed. Support was highest among Downstaters, at 38 percent, but a majority of 55 percent still were opposed.
The General Assembly did not include the ban on carrying in restaurants in a compromise bill that failed to pass last week. The omission was sharply criticized by the governor.
A lobbyist with a gun control group confidently predicted last week that if the proposal got to the House and Senate floors it would pass easily. The poll shows why.
The problem is getting the idea to the floor. Legislative leaders don’t want to substantially alter their agreement on the concealed carry bill before the ink is even dry on the new law. But this appears to be a very powerful issue and pressure will most certainly build to move something next spring.
More on that poll here.
16 Comments
|
The people are with him
Monday, Jul 15, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From my weekly syndicated newspaper column…
Years ago, Gov. Pat Quinn told a friend of mine that Illinois voters were pretty easy to understand. Illinoisans love populism, Quinn explained, so doing populist stuff was the way to win their hearts.
And if a recent Capitol Fax/We Ask America poll is correct, then Quinn has done just that with a line-item veto of legislative salaries and benefits. At least, for now.
Earlier today,” 1,217 registered Illinois voters were told the evening of July 10, “Governor Pat Quinn used his veto powers to suspend the salaries of state senators and representatives until they come up with what he thinks is an acceptable solution for the state’s pension crisis. The governor said he did so because he was tired of waiting for legislators to fix the problem, although options available are controversial and may be unconstitutional. Some called the action a ‘publicity stunt,’ while others said they hoped the governor’s plan spurred legislators to action.”
A very strong 66 percent of respondents said they approved of the governor’s action. Just 23 percent disapproved and 11 percent were uncertain. The poll had a margin of error of +/- 2.8 percent and 28 percent of the automated calls were made to mobile phones.
The results were pretty even, with 66 percent of women and 68 percent of men approving, while 65 percent of Republicans, 64 percent of Democrats and 69 percent of independents approved. Disapproval was in the low to mid 20s for all.
The survey found that 80 percent of suburban Cook County residents, 74 percent of Collar County denizens and 68 percent of Chicagoans backed the governor’s action. The only comparative weakness was among Downstaters, but a majority of 52 percent still approved with 34 percent disapproving. I’d take those numbers any day.
Lots of folks were quoted in the media last week comparing Quinn’s move to the Rod Blagojevich legislative wars. They’re right to an extent. Blagojevich and Quinn have played from many of the same populist playbooks. The difference is, Quinn really believes in this stuff.
And keep in mind that Blagojevich was elected governor twice. He successfully played that populist card to the hilt. Battles with the General Assembly are popular outside the Statehouse.
So, we can probably expect more of this from Quinn. The public just eats it up and because his personal polling numbers are so bad and because he’s failed at so many things it’s his only clear path to political victory.
But win or lose, this veto will come with a huge legislative pricetag. Legislators have, indeed, been dragging their feet on a pension reform deal for a very long time. But they have their reasons and they understandably hate being publicly embarrassed like this. Quinn has now made some very serious and long-lasting Statehouse enemies. He probably doesn’t care. But governance — and therefore the state — is gonna suffer.
Subscribers have full crosstabs.
I’ll post the rest of the column in a separate thread.
32 Comments
|
Must-see TV
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* These two guys really don’t like each other, so I may break my habit of skipping the Sunday “newsmaker” shows this weekend…
CNN’s “State of the Union” Govs. Rick Perry, R-Texas, and Pat Quinn, D-Ill.
Remember this quote?…
[Gov. Pat Quinn] joked about his time with Republican presidential candidate Texas Governor Rick Perry, with whom he roomed during a trip to Iraq two years ago.
“And I had to listen to his so-called philosophy for seven days. The harshest philosophy known to man,” Quinn said.
12 Comments
|
Question of the day
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Rep. Dwight Kay (R-Glen Carbon) won by a little over 300 votes last year against an unknown, underfunded Democratic opponent who had no leadership backing.
Yet, now, he wants to run for House Republican Leader. As you already know, HGOP Leader Tom Cross wants to run for attorney general in case Lisa Madigan doesn’t stand for reelection. Several House Republicans are interested.
This Kay campaign is highly unusual because chamber leaders often have to take some pretty bad votes to help a member out here and there or to follow through on a deal with the other leaders. So, you just don’t usually see people from swing districts running for the top job anywhere in the country. There’s just too much danger that they’d be a one-termer and that it would cost the caucus even more money to defend them because they are the leader.
* Anyway, Kay recently sent out a glossy brochure touting his candidacy. The piece was posted on Jack Roeser’s Champion News site.
Click here to read it.
Some of the ideas aren’t bad at all, some of them are retreads. It’s a good-looking piece, but I did notice some avoidable typos, which prolly ain’t a great thing.
…Adding… Just in case you missed it when you were looking at Kay’s brochure…
NEW IDEAS: Dwight Kay wants the House Repubicans to be a laboratory of creativity, known for their innovative solutions. […]
JOB CREATOR: With our state facing record unemployment, the House Repubican Caucus would be well-served by having their leader also have real-world business experience.
Emphasis added to point out that maybe I’m wrong. Apparently, he’s running for something besides the House Republican Leader post.
* From Rep. Kay’s brochure…
* The Question: Caption?
66 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Entirely missing the point
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I agree with Steve Chapman…
The headline on last Sunday’s Chicago Tribune was stark and arresting: “A thousand shootings.” That’s what Chicago experienced in the first six months of 2013. It works out to more than five a day.
So what crime issue got Gov. Pat Quinn worked up last week? The danger posed by Illinoisans holding state permits to carry concealed firearms. “My foremost duty as governor is to keep the people of Illinois safe,” he said in issuing an amendatory veto of a bill to legalize concealed carry in the last state without it. […]
Quinn responded: “Following a weekend of horrific violence in Chicago in which at least 70 people were shot and 12 killed, this was the wrong move for public safety in Illinois.” But of those 70 shootings — or the 1,000-plus shootings that preceded them this year — it’s safe to wager that few if any involved legal weapons used by individuals legally entitled to own them. […]
Opponents, however, never tire of insisting that letting individuals tote firearms will unleash mass carnage. The Washington-based Violence Policy Center makes much of the fact that since 2007, by its count, 516 people have been killed by permit holders.
But a quarter of those were suicides, which are not a danger to public safety. Though the figure sounds high, it’s less than 90 a year — in a country with more than 50,000 homicides and suicides annually.
The number of licensees who make lethal misuse of their guns, likewise, is a microscopic percentage of the estimated 6 million people who are authorized to carry. The overwhelming majority behave in a responsible, lawful way. The people behind the epidemic of violent crime in Chicago, by contrast, don’t bother with permits and wouldn’t qualify for them.
For this group, the new law is irrelevant. Politicians who use the ongoing slaughter as a reason to oppose it only confirm that when it comes to government’s most important function, they haven’t got a clue.
Some people just hate guns and everything to do with guns, so anything that expands gun rights is viewed with hostility.
54 Comments
|
Nothing here yet
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* If this is “illegal,” then almost every politician in Illinois is going to prison.
The Sun-Times reports on yesterday’s House Mass Transit Committee hearings on the Metra weirdness…
Early in the nearly six-hour hearing, Joseph Gagliardo, the rail agency’s lawyer, told state Rep. Deb Mell (D-Chicago) and her fellow panel members about the request from Madigan’s office — a request the lawyer insisted was not political.
“Elected officials don’t lose their First Amendment rights to talk to people,” Gagliardo testified.
“Speaker Madigan inquired about a raise for an employee. It’s not inappropriate for an elected official to inquire about a wage increase for somebody. It’s not based on politics,” Gagliardo said.
Earlier this week, Metra Chairman Brad O’Halloran said [ex-CEO Alex Clifford] and his attorney had argued that if Clifford’s contract was not renewed, it would be in retaliation for Clifford reporting “alleged illegal conduct” to the Metra Board — supposedly political pressure involving hiring and contract awards. Before his exit, Clifford initially threatened a “whistleblower lawsuit” and was asking for more than the $718,000 package he got.
In a prepared statement released Thursday, Madigan said only that his office recommended Metra bosses give employee Patrick Ward a raise.
Madigan, who praised Ward’s academic and professional career in the statement, said he and Ward have worked together “on a variety of projects” over the past 15 years; his statement didn’t elaborate on those projects.
The discussion about the raise began with Ward contacting Madigan’s office in roughly March 2012, according to Madigan’s statement.
Ward, a Metra labor relations specialist since 2008, notified Madigan’s office that “in spite of being asked to assume expanded tasks with additional responsibilities in his position, his $57,000 salary had not increased in more than three years,” Madigan’s statement said,
“Given the information presented to my office, we forwarded a recommendation to Metra senior staff that Mr. Ward be considered for a salary adjustment. My office’s recommendation supplemented an endorsement which I understand he received from his supervisor, who concluded Mr. Ward was underpaid and that his job performance and education warranted a salary adjustment. ”
But Clifford ultimately rejected the recommendation, Madigan said. The House Speaker said he then withdrew his recommendation for the raise.
Ward is a 13th Ward guy. He asked for help and a letter was sent, then withdrawn. Ward eventually resigned.
* If anybody can tell me what the alleged crime is here, I’m all ears.
Yes, Madigan is powerful, but was Metra retaliated against for not giving his guy a raise? Nobody has once made that claim. And even if Madigan did retaliate, it’d be wrong, but likely not illegal.
I mean, seriously, writing a letter for a political supporter is now supposed to be some sort of scandal? Are you kidding me?
* Also, Rep. Mell still blames MJM for the failure of gay marriage and is Rod Blagojevich’s sister-in-law, so assigning that committee to the task of probing the Metra deal was an interesting move by the Speaker, since he undoubtedly knew his name would come up. Rep. Jack Franks had grabbed some headlines, but his committee wasn’t involved yesterday.
* Speaking of the Mell family, it appears that Rod Blagovjevich may have been right after all…
A felon convicted of bribing a public official says he and Ald. Richard Mell (33rd) were silent partners in the Joliet landfill that spurred a nasty family feud with Mell’s son-in-law, then-Gov. Rod Blagojevich, according to allegations in a lawsuit obtained by the Chicago Sun-Times.
Mell has long denied having any financial interest in the landfill, which sold for $17.7 million in 2008. But the lawsuit filed by Robert Pruim Sr. and his son, Robert Jr., in Will County Circuit Court, accuses the powerful alderman of helping create the business, taking a one-third ownership stake and then conspiring to defraud the Pruims out of nearly $3.7 million when the sale occurred. […]
The lawsuit claims Mell held meetings about the landfill deal in his aldermanic office and used his political connections to help a now-imprisoned distant relative, Frank Schmidt, become the face of the landfill business.
Because the landfill could accept construction debris from state construction projects, “neither Pruim Sr. (prior felony conviction for bribery) nor Mell (political figure and father-in-law of the governor) could be listed as ‘stated’ owners,” the court papers say. […]
Federal court documents show that Schmidt had more than $9 million in income in 2008 — the year of the sale. That same year, Mell reported a capital gain in excess of $5,000 from an “investment in F. Schmidt Corp.” on his aldermanic financial disclosure form. […]
Mell has long denied having any financial interest in the landfill deal, which was the genesis of a public dispute with the now-imprisoned Blagojevich. Blagojevich temporarily shut down the landfill in 2005, accusing Schmidt of accepting illegal waste and of promoting his ties to Mell as a way to get business.
An infuriated Mell lashed out, telling the Chicago Sun-Times at the time that a key Blagojevich adviser — the late Christopher G. Kelly — had been trading plum state government appointments for $50,000 campaign contributions. Mell later publicly apologized after Kelly threatened legal action.
Blagojevich was concerned that Mell had a hidden financial interest in the landfill. As governor, he launched a legislative assault on the landfill industry and pushed legislation that would specifically ban relatives of the governor from having any financial stake in landfills or receiving any “personal financial benefit” from waste-disposal operators.
34 Comments
|
*** UPDATED x1 *** Today’s quote
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From Aviva Bowen’s Facebook page…
Lemmegetthisstraight. And I’m not commenting on pro/con of Quinn’s move.
But when it comes to the promised compensation of our state legislators, we are focused urgently on the constitutionality of cutting it.
But when it comes to slashing the promised compensation of a half-million teachers, emergency responders, and public service workers with their life savings in a state pension system some say, “Meh. who knows. Let’s just do it and worry about constitutionality later.”
Aviva works for the Illinois Federation of Teachers, so she’s a bit biased, but I don’t disagree at all.
* Also, Attorney General Lisa Madigan announced within hours that she’d be looking into the constitutionality of the governor’s line-item veto. But AG Madigan has yet to publicly voice an opinion on any of the proposed pension reform plans.
That seems rather duplicitous. Madigan’s office has said that she won’t comment on an issue that could be litigated. But Quinn’s veto could very well be challenged in court.
I’m not sure I quite understand this, other than the fact that she may run for governor and wants to stay out of the pension fight.
*** UPDATE *** From the attorney general’s office…
Rich, regarding Aviva’s Facebook comment and your post, we have not publicly weighed in on the governor’s actions on the legislative pay. We simply said we were looking at issue based on questions brought to our office and raised by our lawyers.
As you noted, we have not publicly weighed in on the pension matter given the anticipated litigation once a reform measure is passed. We anticipate possibly litigation involving the governor’s actions as well, which explains why we have simply indicated we are doing a legal analysis.
42 Comments
|
Careful what you cheer
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My Sun-Times column…
Pretty much everybody is cheering Gov. Pat Quinn for vetoing state legislators’ salaries out of the Illinois budget this week.
Quinn vetoed lawmaker salaries because, he said, he was tired of waiting year after year for legislators to pass a comprehensive pension reform plan.
Probably the only state politicians despised more than Quinn himself these days are legislators, so nobody is weeping for legislators’ personal financial troubles. Quinn, down in the polls and desperate for any kind of “win,” knows this is a sure-fire way to appeal to the populist disgust with the no-can-do General Assembly.
But man, is this ever a dangerous stunt.
Not even Rod Blagojevich at his most insane ever attempted this maneuver. Blagojevich fought the General Assembly tooth and nail, even at one point firing the wife of House Speaker Madigan’s chief of staff.
Blagojevich kept the General Assembly in overtime sessions month after month, fought court battles over his powers to force them to bend to his will, but never had the chutzpah to veto their salaries out of the budget.
That should tell you how extreme this ploy is.
And if this action isn’t eventually repudiated, either by the courts or by the General Assembly, it’ll probably happen again.
Here’s a plausible scenario:
The Illinois Legislature, particularly the House, is pretty divided over abortion rights. So what would happen if a staunchly pro-life governor decided to veto legislative pay until they approved an anti-abortion bill? Maybe the Legislature would override him, but maybe hardcore pro-life forces could stop a veto override motion from reaching the required three-fifths supermajority until a bill was passed.
If you’re pro-life, just reverse the scenario.
This is nothing short of legislative blackmail.
OK, you may be saying, isn’t pension reform a dire emergency worth the risk?
Well, after years of skyrocketing by about a billion dollars a year, state pension payments will rise by about $200 million next year and the year after next. That’s still a lot of money, but nothing like it has been.
Even so, the state can’t afford what it’s paying now, let alone lots more down the road.
So, you’d be right to ask, what if this veto is the only way Quinn could get the General Assembly to act?
For all practical purposes, any bill passed now won’t take effect until July 1 of next year.
So why all the rush to pass a bill that won’t take effect for almost a year? The New York bond rating agencies are screaming for action. And Illinois, with the worst credit rating in the nation, is at their mercy. Getting a law on the books will calm things down.
But there’s something else. Quinn’s budget director recently submitted a list of pension reform “scenarios” to the special legislative committee tasked with coming up with a solution. Nobody knows how much those ideas will save because the actuaries haven’t finished studying them.
It would be just plain stupid to pass a pension-reform bill before anybody even knew what it would save, but Quinn went ahead and vetoed legislator salaries even though his own new plan hadn’t even been vetted.
That’s a bit harsh.
Also, the committee has its own set of pension-reform scenarios which have been sent to the actuaries. Meanwhile, everybody has to wait around and nobody is getting paid.
How productive.
Everybody is falling for Quinn’s dangerous little stunt because it looks so deliciously justifiable. Careful what you wish for.
73 Comments
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|