Question of the day
Thursday, Sep 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Today is Talk Like a Pirate Day…
Why hurl salty insults at your friends and loved ones today like you’re a one-eyed raider of the high seas? The intent behind today’s holiday is for young and old alike to enjoy the seafaring dialects that first entered pop culture when “Treasure Island” was published in 1883 and peaked around the time Johnny Depp first appeared in “Pirates of the Caribbean” as Keith Richards’ flamboyant younger brother. Mistaking the holiday for an opportunity to terrorize people in a dinghy while speaking Somali could get you arrested. Sure, they used to do the same awful things back in the early-18th century’s “golden age” of piracy, but back then they wore hoop earrings and baboushkas and said things like, “I’ll slash ye guts and feed yer to the sharks, ye pox-faced sea dog.” Being pillaged was a lot more fun in the old-timey days.
* The Question: Your pirate-speak “advice” for the remaining gubernatorial candidates?
…Adding… If you’re new to this, you can find helpful online “English to Pirate” translating services here and here.
34 Comments
|
The obsession with doctrine
Thursday, Sep 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I’m not a Catholic, but I gotta say that this is pretty good advice for everyone, in all walks of life, including politics…
[Pope Francis’] vision of what the church should be stands out, primarily because it contrasts so sharply with many of the priorities of his immediate predecessors, John Paul II and Benedict XVI. They were both intellectuals for whom doctrine was paramount, an orientation that guided the selection of a generation of bishops and cardinals around the globe.
Francis said the dogmatic and the moral teachings of the church were not all equivalent.
“The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently,” Francis said. “We have to find a new balance; otherwise even the moral edifice of the church is likely to fall like a house of cards, losing the freshness and fragrance of the Gospel.”
Rather, he said, the Catholic Church must be like a “field hospital after battle,” healing the wounds of its faithful and going out to find those who have been hurt, excluded or have fallen away. […]
“We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage and the use of contraceptive methods. This is not possible,” he said. “The teaching of the church, for that matter, is clear and I am a son of the church, but it is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time.”
Mixing religion and politics is always a dangerous game, so please try to keep it civil in comments. Thanks.
54 Comments
|
* First the good news…
Illinois was one of just four states where the median household income rose last year, while Missouri and Virginia were the only ones that saw a decline. That income level in Illinois rose 1.4 percent to $55,137, while neighboring Missouri’s fell 1.6 percent to $45,321.
* Now the bad…
The latest federal data show that 14.7 percent of Illinoisans - 1.85 million people or one in seven residents of the state - were in poverty last year, down slightly from the 15 percent, or 1.88 million, in 2011. The national rate also remained discouragingly stuck at 15 percent - affecting 46.5 million Americans and marking the sixth year in a row the U.S. rate failed to improve.
* And the numbers might even be worse than depicted…
Illinois saw such a slight easing, coinciding with a drop in the state’s unemployment rate to 8.9 percent last year from 9.7 percent in 2011 and 10.4 percent in 2010, when Illinois’ jobless ranks were the highest since 1983, according the Illinois Department of Employment Security. Illinois’ seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for July was 9.2 percent.
With the increased unemployment rate, poverty may be again on the rise.
* Also this…
The breadth of Illinois’ poverty on a local level remains murky, given that census figures released Thursday only focused on counties with populations of at least 65,000, which in Illinois number just 23 of the state’s 102 counties. Those did not include most counties in largely rural southern Illinois, where high unemployment and poverty have notoriously deep roots.
*** UPDATE *** More bad news.
The Illinois Department of Employment Security reports today that the state’s unemployment rate for August was unchanged at 9.2 percent.
Oy.
32 Comments
|
Crime, punishment, reform and rate hikes
Thursday, Sep 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* No indictments…
Nearly 10 months after former Mayor Richard M. Daley’s nephew Richard J. “R.J.” Vanecko was indicted in the 2004 death of David Koschman, a grand jury investigation into the way police and prosecutors handled the case has ended and no new indictments will be issued.
Special prosecutor Dan K. Webb’s office said Thursday the grand jury has completed its work and that the statute of limitations has expired on bringing additional charges in the case.
Webb said that he, “after having thoroughly reviewed the evidence, has determined that no additional indictments would be sought because: (1) any prosecution as to actions taken by Chicago Police Department or the Cook County state’s attorney’s office personnel in 2004 are barred because of the three-year statute of limitations period, which was not otherwise extended under applicable state criminal law; (2) there is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any violations of Illinois criminal law as to actions taken by CPD personnel in 2011; and (3) there is no evidence of any kind suggesting any violations of Illinois criminal law as to actions taken by SAO personnel in connection with its participation in the Koschman investigation in 2011 and 2012.”
* Meanwhile…
After two days of deliberations, a federal jury on Wednesday found Eugene Mullins, a friend and onetime aide to former Cook County Board President Todd Stroger, guilty of seven of eight counts at his corruption trial.
Mullins was acquitted of one count of wire fraud but convicted of three other wire fraud counts and four counts of bribery. The charges stemmed from four contracts he was accused of steering toward contractors in exchange for nearly $35,000 in kickbacks.
Mullins faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison on each count of wire fraud and 10 years in prison on each count of accepting a kickback. U.S. District Judge Amy St. Eve set sentencing for Dec. 19.
The verdict follows a colorful trial in which defense attorneys told animated stories to illustrate their points. In closing arguments, Mullins’ attorney Brunell Donald-Kyei barked like a dog and later meowed to illustrate how four contractors changed their stories after being questioned by investigators.
* And…
Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s administration is changing the way it awards insurance brokerage contracts in the wake of former city Comptroller Amer Ahmad’s indictment and a Chicago Sun-Times report about the awarding of insurance business to a company whose lobbyist has ties to a top deputy in the comptroller’s office.
The move reverses a change made nearly two years ago — months after Emanuel took office and appointed Ahmad — that gave the comptroller’s office “the power to purchase, directly or through an insurance broker that he engages, and subject to the approval of the budget director, insurance for the city.”
* And while it may not belong here, this could turn out to be a big story…
The city of Chicago is asking the state to change its method of buying power for utility customers in a way that almost certainly would hike electricity rates for those still getting their electricity from Commonwealth Edison Co.
The move, also endorsed by retail power suppliers, would make it easier for the city’s supplier, Chicago-based Integrys Energy Services, to beat ComEd’s rates when its contract with the city comes up for renewal in May. But it likely would boost electric bills in large suburbs like Joliet and Waukegan whose constituents have rejected referendums that would have allowed their city officials to buy power on their behalf from outside suppliers. […]
David Kolata, executive director of consumer advocacy group Citizens Utility Board, opposes changing the IPA’s procurement process.
“It’s not a good policy to artificially increase (utility) prices to artificially claim there are savings,” he said.
Yikes.
13 Comments
|
OK, but how do you pay for it?
Thursday, Sep 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I was on vacation when Sen. Kirk Dillard did his campaign kickoff, so I missed this…
During the Dillard statewide fly around, the DuPage Republican announced his support to reverse the Tamms Correctional Center closure and, if elected, he will stop any potential closure process of the Warren G. Murray Developmental Center.
The meltdown predicted after the closure of Tamms hasn’t happened. Yes, there’s been a lot of media coverage of problems in the prison system, but it doesn’t appear that ex-inmates from Tamms are pushing assaults up.
I have a much-beloved aunt who is fighting hard to keep Murray open, so I think I’ll just defer on that one for now.
* But here’s something I posted last year, when the General Assembly voted to override a Pat Quinn veto which cut funding for Tamms…
Quite a few Democrats voted to override the governor, but Republicans have been clamoring for budget cuts for years now, yet most of them voted to override. Here are a few quotes from memory lane…
* “No one wants to be cut. Everyone points the finger and says: ‘Cut them, not me.’”
- Sen. Kirk Dillard, Daily Herald, April 27, 2012
* “It is time that we stop this abuse of tax dollars and make the real spending cuts needed to balance the budget.”
Sen. Kirk Dillard, campaign release, March 16, 2012
Dillard also wants to force the income tax hike to expire in 2015, so there will be even less money to reopen a shuttered prison and keep another facility running.
Discuss.
35 Comments
|
Term limit myths
Thursday, Sep 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Chris Mooney, director of the Institute of Government and Public Affairs at the University of Illinois, tackled some myths about term limits in Crain’s. Mooney has done quite a bit of research on the topic.
One point that particularly caught my eye is the apparently false belief that term limits shift power to lobbyists…
Lobbyists despise term limits and are not strengthened. Their job depends on developing trust with lawmakers and educating them on issues. With term limits, lobbyists must work ever harder at this, as members and leaders come and go.
That’s an interesting point and probably spot on.
* More…
• Term limits will yield “citizen legislators,” bringing some common sense and real-world experience to state government.
False. Term-limited legislators are no different in their political experience and ambition than those who are not term-limited, although there is more “churning” of officeholders, as local officials and state lawmakers swap offices more frequently.
• Term limits will make legislatures more diverse.
False. Term-limited lawmakers are not noticeably different in occupational profile, average age, gender or race.
• Term limits will increase competition and decrease campaign spending.
False. Overall, these don’t change with term limits, although their patterns do. A term-limited incumbent is almost never challenged for re-election. Rather, people interested in the job will wait for his/her final term, at which point there is a colossal scrum for the open seat. Whoever wins the seat then gets a pass until his/her limit is reached.
* Another interesting point…
Committee chairs have less knowledge of issues and procedures, leading to more chaotic, partisan hearings and less influence in the lawmaking process.
In the House, committees are very tightly controlled by leadership, so term limits would likely produce even more partisan “chaos.”
* I know I’m excerpting too much, but one final thought from Mooney…
Of course, term limits advocates might argue that weakening the legislature is good. But as one who values the American principle of balanced power in government, I offer one word of caution to those who would like to see the currently strong Illinois governorship grow even stronger: Blagojevich.
Discuss.
61 Comments
|
Yesterday’s other hearing
Thursday, Sep 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* SJ-R…
Attorneys for some retired state workers argued before the Illinois Supreme Court Wednesday that the retirees should not be required to pay premiums for their state-subsidized health insurance.
However, attorneys for the state continued to maintain that health insurance benefits are separate from pension benefits and thus not protected by the state Constitution. […]
“Do an Internet search for jobs with benefits,” [Edward Kionka, one of two attorneys representing retired state workers] told the court. “Everyone know that means such things as health insurance. The term benefits is much broader than pensions.” […]
Assistant Attorney General Richard Huszagh said nothing in that law established retiree health insurance as a contractual right.
“There is nothing in the group insurance act that satisfies the strict standards to establish a contractual status for those provisions,” he argued. “What the plaintiffs are asking the court to do is give the pension clause a new and expansive interpretation.”
* Here’s some analysis posted yesterday on the Appellate Strategist blog…
This morning, a seemingly skeptical Illinois Supreme Court appeared ready to side with the State in a dispute over 2012 amendments to the State Employee Group Insurance Act. Several Justices peppered the two attorneys splitting argument time for the plaintiffs with sixteen questions during their opening, many of which echoed various points made in the Circuit Court’s opinion tossing the case out of court. In comparison, counsel for the State was treated gently, receiving only five questions in all, four of them from Justice Thomas.
It’s a very detailed and involved report, so go read the whole thing.
* Our commenter RNUG, who has proved to be a heck of a pension issues analyst, disagreed…
Just finished watching to the Kanerva v Weems video and reading the analysis by Kirk Jenkins. I won’t belabor the items point by point but just say I don’t necessarily agree with Jenkins’ analysis but we’ll eventually see how accurate his reading is.
The one thing that really struck me was the arguments used by the State re what is protected by the Pension Clause. The state’s attorney made every one of the arguments a lot of us have been making that the pensions themselves can’t be diminished in any way, shape or form. Whoever ends up suing over SB0001, SB2424 or whatever gets passed can just use all the state’s own arguments to make the point the pensions can’t be diminished.
RNUG (which stands for Retired Non-Union Guy) updated and expanded his thoughts this morning…
1) The [Illinois Supreme Court], which probably doesn’t want to be in the middle of the pension clause arguments, could use this case to send a clear message that the pensions can’t be altered after the fact.
2) The questioning seemed to indicate that the judges had some problems with the points raised by both sides. If I had to guess on the ruling, it might be a split one, returning the case to the circuit court, giving the state the right to minimally alter the health insurance but finding that (at minimum) access to the State’s group health plan at a reasonable cost is, in fact. a contractually and constitutionally protected right … while leaving the details of exactly what and how to be determined by the circuit court.
If the court ruled as outlined in #2, that takes any ‘consideration’ for health insurance access off the table, negating Cullerton’s SB2424 contractual alteration argument. Some expanded comments (as done in previous pension cases) about what is protected could also dispel the notion of any ‘police powers’ argument.
* Watch the hearing for yourself…
Click to view
30 Comments
|
My favorite charity
Thursday, Sep 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Commenter “Lobo Y Olla” scoffed this week at a claim made by another commenter that the Cook County State’s Attorney was low-balling the number of cases it would dismiss against people who benefited from the recent Illinois Supreme Court ruling on carrying loaded guns in public…
If Cook dismisses more than 100 cases, I’ll donate $100 to Rich’s favorite charity.
* From Fox 32…
Prosecutors say they’ve dismissed all charges against at least 103 defendants arrested for illegal gun possession in Chicago.
You can donate to Lutheran Social Services of Illinois by clicking here.
Thanks.
7 Comments
|
Caption contest!
Thursday, Sep 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The photo is a little difficult to see because it was taken with a mobile phone kinda far away, but the photographer inadvertently caught a moment during David Vite’s retirement party last night when it almost appeared as if House Speaker Michael Madigan was bowing down to new House Republican Leader Jim Durkin…
Funniest commenter wins a free state legislative mobile app that I’m getting ready to roll out.
Our last winner was “Dirty Red” for this caption of a Bill Daley pic…
“Attention fair goers: would the owner of a green and white campaign tour bus please report to gate two. You’re parked on top of my crowning achievement……Green and white tour bus parked on top of my crowning achievement.”
Heh.
50 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|