This just in… Pension bill signed
Thursday, Dec 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a press release, and check out MJM’s high praise for himself…
Governor Pat Quinn today signed into law his number one priority – historic legislation that addresses the most critical fiscal challenge in Illinois by reforming the state’s pension systems. This comprehensive pension reform solution will eliminate the state’s unfunded liability and fully fund the pension systems, a standard set by the Governor two years ago.
After inheriting the worst-funded pension crisis in the nation that was 70 years in the making, Governor Quinn made pension reform his top priority and worked with legislative leaders and legislators to pass Senate Bill 1. In June, he proposed a conference committee to break the ongoing legislative gridlock, and this vehicle led to the bill he signed today. Earlier this year, the Governor suspended legislative salaries and refused to accept his own salary until pension reform was sent to his desk.
“Illinois is moving forward,” Governor Quinn said. “This is a serious solution to address the most dire fiscal challenge of our time. I applaud House Speaker Michael Madigan, Senate President John Cullerton, House Minority Leader Jim Durkin, Senate Minority Leader Christine Radogno, Senator Kwame Raoul, Senator Daniel Biss, Representative Elaine Nekritz, Representative Darlene Senger, members of the conference committee, and legislators from both parties who made this day possible. Working together, we will continue to build a brighter future for the people of Illinois.”
Sponsored by Senator Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago) and Speaker Michael Madigan (D-Chicago), Senate Bill 1 will eliminate the state’s unfunded pension liability and fully stabilize the systems to ensure retirement security for employees who have faithfully contributed to the systems. All four leaders worked tirelessly to negotiate and pass this legislation.
“The bill would not have passed without me. I was convinced that standing fast for substantial savings, clear intent and an end to unaffordable annual raises would result in a sound plan that will meet all constitutional challenges,” Speaker Madigan said.
“I applaud the Governor for prioritizing this issue,” Senate President Cullerton said. “I look forward to working with him and all legislative leaders to ensure that we continue on this path of fiscal leadership and bipartisan cooperation.”
“With today’s bill signing we have staved off a greater crisis,” Leader Durkin said. “I am proud many of the significant components are Republican ideas generated by the conference committee, and my predecessor through Senate Bill 1. We should place value into Fitch Ratings’ initial comments viewing our actions as positive and I am confident this law will withstand a court challenge and feel it is a major victory for Illinois taxpayers.”
“This is a major step forward in putting Illinois on the path to financial recovery,” Leader Radogno said. “It is the result of bipartisan, bicameral negotiations, after a great deal of debate and discussions. It will demonstrate to the credit rating agencies and job creators that we are serious about turning Illinois around. This is not the only step we need to take to get Illinois back on track. But it is a significant step at a time when doing nothing would only make our problems worse. I’m proud of the bipartisan effort and its result. Now we need to build on this momentum.”
Under the new law, the state will adopt an actuarially sound funding schedule that requires level payments and achieves 100 percent funding no later than the end of fiscal year 2044. To prevent future governors and legislatures from repeating the same behavior that helped create the pension crisis, the law includes a funding guarantee, giving retirement systems the right to go to court if the state fails to make the required payment to the pension fund.
Under the new law, there will be no reductions in the pension checks going out to current retirees. The law will also minimize the impact on the lower-earning, longer-serving employees. There will continue to be Cost of Living Adjustments (COLA); however, they will grow at a slower rate. For most employees, the COLA will be adjusted from the current 3 percent annually compounding increases that are unsustainable to a new formula based on years of service that includes protections for lower-earning, longer-serving employees.
For example, under the new law, a 65-year-old retired state conservation worker with 20 years of service receiving a $17,000 state pension will see that grow to about $22,000 over 10 years. Prior to the law, that would have grown to about $22,400 over 10 years.
Under the new law, current active employees will see COLA pauses every other year upon retirement, with the number of pauses determined by current age. The law also reduces the amount of money current employees pay into their pensions by one percent.
In addition, pensionable salary will now be capped at the greater of the Tier 2 salary cap ($109,971 for 2013), the employee’s current salary, or the employee’s salary at the end of an existing collective bargaining agreement. The cap will increase over time, based on the consumer price index (CPI). There will also be graduated increases in retirement age based on the age of the employee, with a maximum increase of five years. The bill also creates an optional 401(k)-style defined contribution plan that will be available for up to 5 percent of Tier 1 employees. Senate Bill 1 goes into effect on June 1, 2014.
Since taking the oath of office, Governor Pat Quinn has made pension reform his top priority in order to restore fiscal stability to Illinois. Unlike his predecessors, he made the full pension payment each year. In May 2009, Governor Quinn established the Pension Modernization Task Force, which laid the foundation for future reform efforts. In 2010, despite intense opposition, he signed into law sweeping pension reform for new hires to save taxpayers billions of dollars.
In January 2012, the Governor convened a pension reform working group to develop a comprehensive solution. Three months later, Governor Quinn proposed a comprehensive pension reform plan that erased the unfunded liability, and refused to sign any legislation that didn’t meet that standard. The Governor also released several studies on the dire impact of pension inaction on education and launched an online campaign to raise awareness about the pension squeeze and the urgent need for reform.
\In June 2013, the Governor proposed a conference committee as a vehicle to break legislative gridlock between the two chambers. He asked the conference committee to forge a compromise that provided 100 percent funding for the systems, which ultimately became the legislation he signed today.
In addition, Governor Quinn also signed Senate Bill 1961 today. Sponsored by Speaker Madigan and Senator William R. Haine (D-Alton), the bill clarifies that the Attorney General will represent the pension systems in any court proceedings, except in cases where the systems are seeking to force the state to make funding payments. The new law takes effect immediately.
* From the We Are One Illinois coalition…
“Governor Pat Quinn has given hundreds of thousands of working and retired teachers, nurses, police, caregivers, first responders, and others no alternative but to seek justice for retirement security through the judicial system. Contrary to his belief, every Illinois citizen loses today.
“It didn’t have to be this way. Bipartisan majorities in both chambers could have passed a much fairer, legal, negotiated solution - with real, substantial savings - in Senate Bill 2404.
“Instead, leading politicians and their followers chose to violate their oaths of office, trample on the Illinois Constitution, and willfully ignore the plain letter of the law. In abandoning their constitutional duties, they’ve voted to slash the retirement benefits of senior citizens and working families by one-third or more.
“Senate Bill 1 is attempted pension theft, and it’s illegal. Once overturned, its purported savings will evaporate, and the state’s finances and pension systems will be left in worse shape.
“Our coalition has been consistently in contact with our attorneys, and today we directed them to prepare to file suit. We will challenge SB 1 as violating the constitution and ask for a stay of the legislation’s implementation pending a ruling on its constitutionality.”
144 Comments
|
* In These Times…
According to one campaigner for the recently passed marriage equality bill, [House Speaker Michael Madigan] demanded support for his pension bill from the major sponsors of the bill as a price for bringing it to the floor.
* By my count, of those who were around for both votes, 13 of the House’s Democratic gay marriage sponsors voted for Madigan’s pension reform bill back in May. Six voted against.
Just three of those previous “No” votes switched to “Yes” this week. One of those who switched was Rep. Lou Lang, a top member of leadership. He basically had no choice. The other two were Reps. Kelly Cassidy and Ann Williams, who explained her vote to constituents…
I have consistently voted against “pension reform” bills that I believed went too far; many took a punitive approach to addressing the problem. I understand that the public employees are not at fault here. On a personal level, this was the most difficult decision I have made as a legislator. But it is also unfair to continue the downward spiral of cutting programs and funding for our neighborhood schools, the mentally ill and disabled, and other critical human services.
While this bill is certainly not perfect, it is significantly improved from the previous version of SB 1, which I did not support. Over the past several months, I worked to make sure that whatever pension bill was passed would be the best bill possible. I pushed for a guarantee that the State will make its pension payment, so we don’t end up right back here in the future. This bill contains that. I strongly advocated for protections for the people at the lowest end of the income scale, and fought to ensure that any changes to COLA be tied to the CPI, to help pensions keep up with inflation. This bill does that. I asked that if benefits must be cut, then it only made sense for employees to contribute less. This bill does that. I believe the legislation that passed is better because of these efforts.
Cassidy was clearly upset when voting for the pension bill. I don’t doubt that something was up with both her and Williams.
But another Democratic gay marriage co-sponsor, Rep. Jehan Gordon-Booth, switched from “Yes” on pension reform in May to “Present” this week.
So, the net gain was just two votes. The bill passed with 62 votes, two more than needed.
Pressure? Probably. But it really didn’t matter in the end.
*** UPDATE 1 *** “I would never trade a vote like that,” said Rep. Williams, calling the allegation in the ITT piece “absolutely ridiculous.” She also said there were no conversations with Madigan about the bill.
*** UPDATE 2 *** Rep. Cassidy: “So much less than true it couldn’t be more ridiculous. [Madigan] never spoke to me about the bill once.” She also called the allegation “patent crap.”
11 Comments
|
Unclear on the concept
Thursday, Dec 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a Northwest Herald editorial blasting the pension reform bill…
If they were truly determined to solve the problem, they would have held this vote before Dec. 3 – the day after the current crop of lawmakers found out who they would be facing in the March primary.
Voting for a controversial bill after the filing deadline makes said bill a little easier to pass. So, if the bill was made even tougher on retirees and employees, holding a vote before the filing deadline would’ve been pointless.
* John Kass climbed aboard the Bruce Rauner bandwagon in his column critiquing the pension bill. He doesn’t mention Rauner’s name, of course…
It doesn’t freeze cost-of-living increases for public employees or put them all on 401(k) plans like many of us are stuck with.
* The bill that Kass appears to love, Rauner supports and the Illinois Policy Institute claims is based on its own draft was introduced in February of this year.
The bill is so “popular” that only three members have signed on: Reps. Jeanne Ives, Tom Morrison (who, with Ives, voted against the pension bill this week after voting for Madigan’s bill) and Barb Wheeler (who voted for both the Madigan bill and the pension bill this week).
Over in the Senate, an identical bill that accomplishes the Rauner/Kass/Illinois Policy Institute goals is sponsored by Sen. Jim Oberweis, who voted for the pension bill this week. Oberweis lined up precisely zero co-sponsors.
In other words, almost nobody in their right minds wants to touch this thing. And yet it’s held up as a viable alternative. On what planet do they live on?
* Rauner, by the way, was on Roe Conn’s show yesterday and claimed he’s been meeting with AFSCME members and teachers…
“Many of them are supporting our campaign.”
You gotta wonder what his definition of “many” is.
Listen to the interview…
49 Comments
|
Question of the day
Thursday, Dec 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* We’re getting a late start because the pension reform debate pretty much sucked all the air out of the Statehouse. So, let’s continue with our Golden Horseshoe Awards…
* Best session bartender
* Best session waiter/waitress
Remember, as always, intensity of your nominations will count far more than the number of nominations. So, please explain your votes or they will be mostly ignored. Thanks much.
15 Comments
|
Houston, we have a round-tabling problem
Thursday, Dec 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Remember that story yesterday about the Chicago Republican Party preparing to challenge the petitions of the planted Republican candidate who is “opposing” Speaker Michael Madigan?
Well, the Chicago GOP may indeed have a valid point. From Illinois Review…
It’s Mr. Goggin’s petitions and signatures that the Chicago GOP started scouring this week, hoping to find enough duplications and errors to oust Goggin from the 22nd House District 2014 GOP primary ballot slot.
The Chicago GOP isn’t just blowin’ smoke, either. They’ve found signatures that are already raising questions - just as they are getting started. And, Chicago GOP’s spokesman Chris Cleveland says, they’re really in need of help to go over each signature before next Monday.
Here’s what they’ve found thus far - an uncanny amount of signatures that appear to be the same handwriting, most often from the same reported address:
A representative sample of scans of what are alleged to be from the Madigan opponent’s petitions…
Yikes.
Click here for more of the same.
If the Republicans can kick this guy off the ballot, or use evidence of fraud to force him to resign, the GOP can then appoint a “real” candidate to the race.
…Adding… As someone pointed out in comments, this could be a case of household members signing for everybody. If that’s true, then it’s doubtful there would be any huge legal problems, but those sigs would be discarded.
44 Comments
|
Confirming the obvious
Thursday, Dec 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Adam Rosen is the Communications Director for SEIU Local 73. He told the Associated Press that in the run-up to the pension reform vote, two Republican gubernatorial candidates sought endorsements from the union…
Rosen told the AP the union has met with two Republican gubernatorial bidders seeking future endorsements. Republican state Sen. Kirk Dillard and state treasurer Dan Rutherford both spoke out against the pension plan, which passed by narrow margins.
Do you think the unions will endorse either one of them?
41 Comments
|
Amazon restarts Illinois associates program
Thursday, Dec 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Forwarded by a reader…
From: “Amazon Associates”
To: xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 5:55:32 PM
Subject: Amazon Associates program is again open to residents of the State of Illinois
Hello,
We’re pleased to announce that the Amazon Associates program is again open to residents of the State of Illinois.
We’re now able to re-open the program because the Illinois State Supreme Court recently struck down legislation that had forced Amazon to close the program to residents of Illinois.
Amazon strongly supports federal legislation like the Marketplace Fairness Act that’s now pending before Congress, which is the only constitutional way to resolve interstate sales tax collection issues.
Some background from October…
The Illinois Supreme Court threw out a state law Friday that taxes certain Internet sales, saying the so-called “Amazon tax” violated federal rules against “discriminatory taxes” on digital transactions.
The 6-1 ruling represented the first time a court had invalidated an Internet sales tax law among 18 states that have them. It brought an immediate cry from traditional, store-based retailers for Congress to step into regulating taxes on web sales.
The court determined that Illinois’ 2011 “Main Street Fairness Act” was superseded by the federal law, which prohibits imposing a tax on “electronic commerce” and obligates collection that’s not required of transactions by other means, such as print or television.
More background here.
* In other news, as you’ll recall the Illinois Supreme Court recently struck down the Department of Revenue’s sales tax collection rules. The ruling came in a case involving a fuel oil company which opened a satellite office in a low-tax county in order to avoid paying higher sales taxes to the RTA and Cook County. Tom Johnson, the President emeritus of the Taxpayers Federation, argues in Crain’s that new rules will be tough to devise…
The problem is for the many retailers that take orders over the phone, through the mail or on the Internet and then have the goods delivered to their customer from either their own or from a supplier’s inventory. The “sales” activities could occur in more than one community in Illinois or even in another state dependent on the facts of a particular sale. Which tax rate should apply, and what if the majority of the selling activity is out of state?
Our state’s tax collectors deserve rules they can follow and should not be subjected to second-guessing years after the fact. A case-by-case weighing of a near-limitless number of factors would fly in the face of good tax policy and be unworkable.
Tax must be calculated and collected at the time of the sale, but a nebulous factor-weighing test would require almost every retailer with more than one location in the state to engage in guesswork, putting them in a never-ending game of “gotcha.” When they collected too little tax, the state or local jurisdictions would sue; when they collected too much tax, class-action lawsuits on behalf of inadvertently overtaxed customers certainly would follow.
Now that this Pandora’s box of tax administration has been opened, it is the Department of Revenue’s job to help its partners comply easily. Guessing is not an option.
9 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Today’s must-watch video
Thursday, Dec 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Sen. Matt Murphy sat on the pension reform conference committee. Murphy’s seat mate is Sen. Kirk Dillard, who had strongly supported every pension bill that came down the pike except for the union-negotiated proposal. Dillard’s campaign posted a video of the candidate explaining his vote on the Senate floor. Reboot Illinois watched the video and wrote this…
Dillard’s deskmate, Sen. Matt Murphy (a member of the committee that drafted the bill) is patient with his colleague at first. But his body language is practically screaming as Dillard goes on. And it’s not screaming, “You go, Kirk!” Be sure to watch until the very last second, when Murphy appears to either cheer that it’s over or let out a long yawn, possibly both. - See more at: http://www.rebootillinois.com/?eopinion=9426&utm_source=email&utm_medium=video-of-the-day-pensions-12/5/2013&utm_campaign=murphy-speaks-body-language-to-dillard:-shut-up-already!-12/5/2013#sthash.np7BYKMU.dpuf
* Murph starts out by deliberately looking away. Then he begins to drum his fingers on the table, twirls around in his chair, rocks way back and forth, fiddles with his tie, makes notes, puffs out his cheeks, shields his eyes from Dillard and, does indeed, yawn at the end. Hilarious…
Maybe he needs a new seat mate.
* Meanwhile, Reboot also produced a handy chart comparing Speaker Madigan’s pension bill from May to the bill that finally passed. Click here for a larger version…
* And Speaker Madigan told reporters late Tuesday how he was able to bridge the gap between Senate Democrats who were concerned about the impact on retirees and House and Senate Republican negotiators who wanted more savings from the legislation…
Madigan: “In the end, just a few days ago, I was the one who made two critical suggestions.
“Number one, I’m the one that said that in terms of the inflation adjuster on the COLA it ought to go to the full consumer price index, which was a significant change because the House bill had provided for flat COLA, no change. The conference committee was talking about one-half of CPI. I’m the one that said, especially to the Senate Democrats, let’s use the full CPI which of course would reduce the cost savings.
“But then we would make that up by my second suggestion, which was to take 10 percent of the savings coming out of the bill and dedicate that to the pension system. Put it all together, you’re back over $160 billion in total cost savings, which was a strong demand from Republicans.”
Q: That 10 percent came in the final days?
Madigan: “Final days. Just before Thanksgiving. And I was the one who fashioned the compromise.”
Q: Did you have to make any promises to get those?
Madigan: “Just to be nice to reporters for a change.”
58 Comments
|
Golden Horseshoe Awards, round one
Thursday, Dec 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Keep in mind that it’s very important to explain your votes. The number of votes isn’t nearly as important as the intensity of the reasoning behind who y’all think are the best in each category. Also, please make sure to make nominations in both categories.
Clear on the concept? OK, let’s get started…
* Best political bar in Springfield
* Best political restaurant in Springfield
28 Comments
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|