Quinn open to negotiating permanent tax rate
Monday, May 26, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Champaign News-Gazette…
Gov. Pat Quinn indicated Saturday that he’s open to negotiating Illinois’ income-tax rate and might accept something less than the 5 percent individual tax rate he’s been campaigning for all spring. […]
“We’re working on a budget that’s balanced, that pays the bills, that pays for the things we want to do as a state, that helps our families. We can negotiate that. That’s part of political life,” he said. “But we’ve got to make sure that we have adequate revenue to pay for the programs that are vital to everyday people and their schools, and making sure that we take good care of people’s safety.”
Asked whether extending the current 5 percent income-tax rate is dead, Quinn said, “No, I think we have to work hard on getting the job done in a balanced way. Revenue has to equal expenditures.”
If that change gets them to 60 House votes, then maybe they should try. I’m just not sure it gets them to 60.
Your thoughts?
31 Comments
|
Question of the day
Monday, May 26, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* It’s becoming clear that traffic is way down today. I’m basically blogging for legislators and the smattering of folks who happen to be at the Statehouse, or who don’t have plans today. I’m not complaining. Just saying.
From Rep. Jeanne Ives…
I find Memorial Day a very moving and important holiday. I filed HR1130 with bi-partisan support to ask that we not have session on Memorial Day out of respect for our nation’s forces who have died in war. This resolution in still in rules committee.
The majority of those who serve with me in the General Assembly are genuine in their esteem for the heroes we honor today and the profound contributions that have made to secure our freedoms. Many of them have joined me on this resolution.
If not this year, for years going forward, I believe we should honor the holiday as originally intended by participating in our community ceremonies that honor our fallen soldiers.
* The Question: Should the General Assembly do all it can to avoid meeting on Memorial Day? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
survey services
29 Comments
|
* Paul Merrion runs the numbers…
Mr. Rauner opposes making the tax hike permanent, yet at the same time, “Bruce will make education a top priority and increase funding for it,” a Rauner campaign spokesman says.
Education accounts for about half of the state’s discretionary spending, which runs about $16.4 billion. If the 5 percent personal income tax rate rolls back to 3.75 percent on Jan. 1 as scheduled, the state would receive roughly $1.75 billion less in revenue for the second half of its fiscal year.
Spreading the cuts evenly, the governor’s office estimates that education would lose $875 million, including $224 million for Chicago schools (see the PDF).
If Mr. Rauner wants to increase education funding in spite of lower revenue, the other half of the discretionary budget would have to be reduced by more than $1.75 billion, a cut of upward of 21 percent. He has not revealed his proposed budget.
* Meanwhile, the SJ-R editorial board wants some answers from Rauner…
It’s not necessarily advantageous to his campaign for Rauner to reveal what his budget plans are at this point. In a more typical Illinois gubernatorial election, observers may not expect to hear such details from candidates until later in the summer. But this is no typical election, and taxpayers deserve to know more than what’s simply thought to be politically advantageous. Illinois has major, potentially devastating financial difficulties.
Rauner may have a revolutionary plan that would save Illinois and relieve taxpayers of an additional burden on their pocketbooks. He won’t show his hand, though, and that’s maddening for people trying to determine the right path for the state.
* In a related story, the Daily Herald editorial board is upset…
The legislature says community colleges should provide this education, but it doesn’t compensate them for the expense of doing it.
Well, we should say, the state doesn’t necessarily compensate the community colleges for this expense. Because in some cases, the state disperses grant money to subsidize at least some of that education.
But our state legislature being our state legislature, it doesn’t do this fairly or openly or without, at the very least, the appearance of political cronyism or favoritism.
As the Illinois News Network reported earlier this month, a House appropriations bill would award $1.25 million in veterans grants to the state’s community colleges, but only 18 of the 43 community colleges in Illinois would receive them.
None of the community colleges in area suburbs would see a dime.
Not College of DuPage, not College of Lake County, not Elgin Community College, not Harper College, not McHenry Community College, not Oakton Community College, not Waubonsee Community College. None of them. Not a single cent.
Community colleges collect property taxes, so the simple answer is that those suburban schools have relatively thriving property tax bases when compared to other schools. Ergo, the different treatment.
* Other stuff…
* House Democrats on the spot with tax, budget votes
9 Comments
|
* AP…
Gov. Pat Quinn’s administration has affirmed its support for the state Department of Natural Resources’ efforts to craft rules governing hydraulic fracturing, saying the process ensures that the public, advocates and experts all have the chance to weigh in.
Saturday’s statement from the governor’s office came a day after Democratic state Rep. John Bradley proposed legislation to jump-start fracking through a measure that would skip that rule-making process. […]
Grant Klinzman, a Quinn spokesman, said the administration takes hydraulic fracturing very seriously and is “making sure it is done right,” adding that the DNR has done “an unprecedented amount of work to ensure the public, advocates and experts all have a voice in the process.”
* More…
“There’s no delay,” said Jennifer Walling, executive director at the Illinois Environment Council. “This whole idea of a delay has been manufactured.”
* I beg to differ…
Illinois Department of Natural Resources Director Marc Miller told the Tribune in a recent interview that the agency received 35,000 comments on its first draft of the rules, all of which it must respond to under the law. […]
IDNR held five lengthy public hearings on the proposed rules, which have about 100 different sections and are hundreds of pages long. Miller said they are done addressing about 25 percent of the areas at issue.
25 percent? The comment period ended the first week of January and they’re only 25 percent of the way through? At that rate, there’s no way they’ll meet their November deadline. It’ll be next spring if IDNR continues at this glacial pace.
Not to mention that many, if not most, of those comments were almost identical to each other, ginned up by interest groups on both sides.
* From an action alert sent out by a group that wants a total fracking moratorium…
On this Memorial Day holiday, the oil industry is attempting to hijack the democratic rule-making process that governs fracking regulations in Illinois. They’re trying to pass amendments to the fracking legislation that would direct the Department of Natural Resources to ignore more than 35,000 comments submitted by the people of Illinois demanding strong regulation and allow industry to begin fracking immediately!
Elected legislators are attempting to hijack a “democratic” rule-making process run by unelected people? Um, OK.
* With all that being said, there are some very legitimate environmental concerns about Bradley’s proposal…
Filed just one week before the Legislature adjourns its spring session, the legislation would skip a rule-making process by the IDNR. Environmental groups interpret the bill as stripping that power away from the state agency and leaving it in the hands of the Legislature itself.
The bill also would establish a moratorium on fracking in northern Illinois counties, though there is limited drilling potential there compared with the central and southern parts of the state. […]
Environmental activists said the legislation would hurt the state’s ability to impose critical controls on a practice with the potential to pollute water and cause other ecological damage. […]
“It does certainly appear to remove the authority of the Department of Natural Resources to adopt any rules, and move that authority to the Legislature to define how fracking is going to be carried out in Illinois,” said Jennifer Cassel, a staff attorney with the Environmental Law and Policy Center.
12 Comments
|
Sen. Forby’s mother passes away
Monday, May 26, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From Rep. Brandon Phelps’ office…
Mrs. Betty Forby, mother of IL Senator Gary Forby, passed away on Saturday, May 24.
Visitation will be from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday, May 26, 2014, at the Hobbs-Johnson Funeral Home & Crematory in Benton. Address: 301 S Main St, Benton, IL 62812. Phone: (618) 438-8711
Funeral services will be held at 11:00 a.m. Tuesday at the funeral home with Pastor Joe Zbinden officiating.
Burial will be in the Cobden Cemetery.
Memorial contributions may be made to the Hospice of Southern Illinois and will be accepted at the funeral home.
http://thesouthern.com/news/local/obituaries/betty-forby/article_0ee5f176-7bc2-535c-872e-e27ee3818674.html
Comments Off
|
Behind the outrage
Monday, May 26, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* You may recall this astonishing statement made earlier this month…
Rockford Mayor Larry Morrissey said Wednesday that Illinois towns and cities would be in a better position to face their public safety pension obligations if they had the ability to file for bankruptcy.
The statement came during a downstate and suburban mayors’ news conference held in Illinois’ state capitol.
“If the state doesn’t give authorization to go to bankruptcy court, you simply cannot do it,” Morrissey said. “Without that … cities are simply left with no recourse when dealing with collective bargaining … in police and fire pensions. So what we end up being is boxed in. … Frankly I wish we could appeal directly to a bankruptcy court, I think it would give us more leverage to get deals done.”
* The firefighters gathered some numbers to show some of the hypocrisy behind the mayors’ outrage about their rising first responder pension costs…
According to the documents, Decatur has seen a 141 percent increase in the amount they’ve contributed to the firefighter pension system since 2003. By contrast, the city’s [Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund] contribution has risen 170 percent.
In Carbondale, city contributions to the firefighters rose 194 percent in the past 10 years. Contributions to IMRF rose 183 percent.
Bloomington’s contributions to firefighters have risen 146 percent since 2003. Contributions to IMRF rose about 82 percent.
Pat Devaney, president of the Associated Fire Fighters of Illinois, said one reason for the silence from mayors on IMRF is that the mayors are covered by IMRF.
Sen. Terry Link, who is trying to put together a first responder pension reform plan, was on Rick Pearson’s WGN Radio show over the weekend and talked about his efforts. Click here to listen.
14 Comments
|
Grandstand roof is rotting
Monday, May 26, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The grandstand at the Illinois State Fair has some serious roof problems…
A section of that roof is falling apart, dropping wood debris on the seats below.
Illinois Department of Agriculture spokesman Jeff Squibb says the problems started when water began seeping under a rubber membrane on the roof and caused the wood to rot.
Squibb says the state’s troubled finances prevented a roof replacement from happening.
A Springfield company has been hired to make the repairs in time for the Illinois State Fair to begin in August.
* More…
Illinois Department of Agriculture spokesman Jeff Squibb said temporary repairs have been made to ensure fan safety this weekend. And, once the cycle races end, workers will begin permanently fixing the roof as part of a $60,000 emergency contract.
The problems started when water began seeping under a rubber membrane on the grandstand roof. “It caused the wood to rot,” Squibb said Friday.
As workers began cleaning the seating area in anticipation of Sunday’s race, they noticed pieces of the roof in the stands.
In order for the races to go on, workers installed a safety barrier on the underside of the roof for protection.
Squibb said the problems might not have occurred if there was more money set aside for maintenance at the fairgrounds.
A plan to put video gaming terminals on the fairgrounds was flatly rejected by Gov. Pat Quinn, even though just about every dinky little bar in town now has the machines. Quinn said at the time that the fair is for families, but that’s obviously not the observation of anyone who’s ever been to a beer tent late at night.
That gaming money would’ve been spent on fairground infrastructure, by the way.
11 Comments
|
Connecting too many dots
Monday, May 26, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* This lede, while factually accurate, is quite a stretch…
Gov. Quinn’s administration chose a well-known West Side social-service provider to distribute millions of dollars in anti-violence money across crime-ravaged Chicago neighborhoods in 2010, even though state audits just months before said the group couldn’t substantiate more than $200,000 in bills involving a summer-jobs program.
* And that morphed into this Associated Press lede…
Gov. Pat Quinn’s administration chose a Chicago social-service provider to distribute millions of dollars in anti-violence money, just months after state audits raised serious questions about the way the group was handling money, according to a published report.
* The hugely hyped first line of a Bruce Rauner weekend press release built on those two media ledes to make this factually inaccurate statement…
In an explosive Sunday front page news story, the Chicago Sun-Times reports that Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn provided millions in state anti-violence funding to a group the Governor, Attorney General and Auditor General knew to be under federal investigation:
* But here’s the timeline I put together based on the Sun-Times story…
* June 22, 2010: IDOT internal auditors “raise red flag” about some Chicago Area Project grants, because time sheets from it and other groups were “typically vague, incomplete and noted activities unrelated to transportation and not in support of IDOT projects.”
* October 10, 2010: Results of a secret investigation by State Executive Inspector General Ricardo Meza were forwarded to Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan, who declined to get involved after being told of a federal investigation (which, after almost four years, has not produced any convictions or even charges).
* August-October, 2010: Chicago Area Project was put in charge of several West Side anti-violence initiatives.
* November, 2011: State Executive Inspector General Ricardo Meza forwarded his findings to the governor’s office.
* Nov. 22, 2011: Quinn’s general counsel responds to Meza by writing that he is “currently in the process of seeking to recoup the overpayments that were made to the five fiscal agents,” including the Chicago Area Project.
* May, 2012: Chicago Area Project, which “vigorously dispute the findings of the OEIG audit as regards performance and alleged overpayments,” appeals IDOT’s demand for the return of grant money to a state arbitrator. The arbitration case has yet to be resolved.
* 2014: Quinn’s office claims the governor, himself, was finally briefed on the situation.
* So, regardless of whether or not Quinn wasn’t briefed until this year, his office was not notified by the Inspector General until over a year after CAP was awarded those anti-violence funds. The Inspector General is required by law to keep his investigations secret until he concludes the probes.
And, you’ll recall, Chicago’s US Attorney was investigating all sorts of allegations on the West Side back in 2010. They eventually ended up making several arrests, but nothing ever emerged about CAP.
1 Comment
|
Guzzardi facing reality
Monday, May 26, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…
There’s an old Statehouse saying that House Speaker Michael Madigan cares mostly about two votes each Democratic legislator makes: One to reelect him Speaker, the other for his chamber’s operating rules.
Some, like Rep. Elaine Nekritz, have gotten away with voting against Madigan’s rules. Nekritz explained to Madigan why she voted against them and he was impressed with her thoughtfulness. She’s since moved up the ladder to become one of the House’s most hard-working members who carries some major legislation.
But nobody ever gets away with voting against Madigan for Speaker.
There’s no question that Democrat Will Guzzardi ran a highly effective outsider campaign against state Rep. Toni Berrios (D-Chicago) earlier this year. Guzzardi soundly defeated Rep. Berrios, the daughter of Cook County Democratic Party Chairman Joe Berrios, and along the way told the Chicago Tribune “The monolithic structures of power in Springfield aren’t doing any good for anyone.”
It’s not difficult to discern who he was talking about. The longest serving House Speaker in Illinois history is the very embodiment of a “monolithic structure of power.”
So, there have been some expectations that Guzzardi might not cast his vote for Michael Madigan’s reelection as Speaker next January, he said last week that he hasn’t yet made up his mind.
“That’s something I intend to figure out when the vote comes up,” Guzzardi said.
While voting against the Speaker would likely score points back home in his independent-minded district, Guzzardi said it’s still a “tough decision” because there’s “a lot hinging on it.”
Guzzardi said he talked with Madigan’s chief of staff Tim Mapes after the primary. Mapes congratulated him and said that the Speaker hoped to sit down with him after the general election.
“We’ve got to figure out what sort of relationship we’re going to have,” Guzzardi said, adding, “I’m sure it’ll be a good one. I want to get stuff done.”
Those last two lines are probably the most important, and telling.
It’s a pretty decent bet that Guzzardi can only have a good relationship with Madigan and get things done for his district if he votes for Madigan.
I reached out to Guzzardi because Madigan’s Democratic Majority PAC is hosting a meet and greet event with the Speaker’s top targeted candidates this month.
Rep. Jaime Andrade (D-Chicago) is the only incumbent on the list, but he was appointed to the seat. He’s attending despite the fact that he has a hugely Democratic district.
The list also includes Carol Ammons, a Democrat who defeated Madigan’s choice Sam Rosenberg in the Champaign County-area district currently represented by Democratic Rep. Naomi Jakobsson. Ammons used Madigan’s backing to bludgeon Rosenberg. Apparently, fences have been mended.
But there are a couple of big holes in the list of meet and greet attendees. Most notable is Guzzardi, who said he wasn’t invited to the event.
Another absence worth noting is Mo Khan, who defeated the establishment’s pick in the 20th House District. Democrat Jerry Acciari was seen by some as a Democratic “lay down” candidate against Chicago’s only Republican state legislator, Rep. Michael McAuliffe. Acciari was backed by the city’s 41st Ward, which sent out fliers using Khan’s original first name of “Mohamed,” even though his legal and ballot name is “Mo.”
Khan ended up winning, but Madigan hasn’t yet expressed his support. There’s a decades-old truce (albeit often violated) on the Northwest Side and surrounding suburbs between the two parties. It appears to be holding for now. Khan said the first he heard of the meet and greet was when a supporter forwarded him the invitation yesterday. The House Democrats promised to respond to questions about the event, but never got back to me.
By the way, Rep. McAuliffe was one of the few Republicans who voted for Madigan’s resolution last week to put a minimum wage increase referendum on the November ballot.
So, is Madigan dissing Guzzardi and Khan? Madigan’s spokesman said they weren’t invited because candidates who face no real opposition in November were left off the list.
So, why, then, was Rep. Andrade invited? Andrade has a solidly Democratic district, after all. Well, Andrade is an appointed legislator, I was told, and that’s why he was invited while others weren’t.
That’s a bit of a stretch, but at least it shows that the Madigan folks aren’t publicly going out of their way to be hostile to Guzzardi. But fully embracing him could be a problem during the spring session, considering some of the residual bitterness about that primary battle among some legislators.
6 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|