Malicious or just plain stupid?
Wednesday, Nov 12, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
OK, first of all, I was on the conference call when the spokesman for the Chicago Board of Elections Commissioners talked to reporters about the robocalls. He never said that 2,000 judges didn’t show up because of the calls. He said that, typically “more than a thousand” judges don’t show up on election day and stressed that the board wouldn’t know who the no-shows were and how many didn’t show up until pay slips were processed. * Mark Brown…
Either way, the “2,000 judges didn’t show up because of robocalls” line is false. Period. At the time, the city board spokesman was simply passing along what he was hearing from the judges, many of whom were extremely upset and some of whom had quit. But he went out of his way not to say which party may have been targeted. * He also said that the calls could’ve been mere “incompetence.” Here is the transcript for two of the calls…
According to the board spokesman on election day, some judges thought the city should pay them for the extra training and quit. People don’t often hear details too well on the phone, especially with calls like these. Back in my youthful telemarketing days (Amoco Motor Club), part of our training involved telling us that people don’t usually pick up on the first few words when they answer their phones. So I can understand how some thought this was an official training, and I can understand why the bad addresses made people even more suspect. * And what about the calls telling judges they had to vote a straight GOP ticket? That didn’t really happen, either. Parilli was urging judges to vote early, just in case they were assigned to a precinct which wasn’t their own. During another robocall, he said judges are “required to participate in voting to be an election judge.” If “participate in voting” means registering to vote, I suppose that’s true. Otherwise, no. And Parilli went on to say this during one call…
From a partisan rah-rah standpoint, I can see where he’s coming from. But there is no actual requirement. * OK, back to Brown…
Ironically enough, Meroni is a crusader against “vote fraud”.
|
Looking out for my own interests, as well as Illinois’
Wednesday, Nov 12, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller * The Change Illinois coalition looked at what happens in the first legislative election after a new district map is enacted into law… Look at the number for competitive races, which are defined as losing candidates who received at least 45 percent of the vote. And, really, it ain’t very “competitive” if somebody gets beat by nine points. I’ve long said that the remapping process is broken. Most people agree. It has to be changed. This is unhealthy for a democracy. And, speaking frankly, it’s also not good for my business model. I need more races to cover, not fewer. Other factors play into this, of course. Why didn’t the Republicans field and fund serious challengers to Lisa Madigan, Jesse White and all countywide Democrats in Cook? Because 1) it would be a waste of money, but more importantly 2) it would prompt those incumbents to spend big bucks on their reelection and that could hurt the Republicans. Same goes for legislative contests. Typically, the House Dems won’t unnecessarily back a sure-loser if it would hurt a Dem Senator, for example. And there is no way that all, or even nearly all districts in this state can be drawn so they’re competitive. Parties are clustered. You can’t draw a GOP district on the South Side of Chicago, for instance. You can’t draw a Democratic district using McLean County as its base. If that could’ve been done, the Democrats woulda tried the last time around. Overall, though, we have a very serious problem with how the maps are drawn. * Democrats haven’t wanted to change the system because they benefited from it in 2011, when they had a Democratic governor. If Bruce Rauner wins two terms, however, they only have a 50-50 chance of controlling the map process (unless they can work out a compromise, which probably can’t happen). The Democrats should look at another part of that chart - seats gained after a remap - and start thinking really hard about their party’s legislative future. They’re on top of the world now, and they may end up picking up even more seats in 2016, but their grip on power could be seriously diminished and possibly even gone with a Republican map drawn to be as partisan as the current one. They would likely be better off with a neutral map. And so would Illinois. …And so would I.
|
Question of the day
Wednesday, Nov 12, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller * What one word best describes your post-election mood? One word only, please. And, of course, keep it clean.
|
UPDATE: $580 MILLION EXELON RATE HIKE?? Do They Really Need a Bailout After Making Nearly $1 BILLION In The Last 90 Days?
Wednesday, Nov 12, 2014 - Posted by Advertising Department [The following is a paid advertisement.] “Chicago-based Exelon’s profit rose 26 percent in the third quarter…The country’s largest owner of nuclear power plants, Exelon reported net income of $993 million…”[Chicago Tribune, October 29, 2014 – emphasis added] Just this past week, a Crain’s analysis revealed that contrary to their claims, Exelon may not be in dire straits after all: “The analysis…raises questions about whether the state effectively will be asked to compel ratepayers to subsidize a profitable enterprise.” [Crain’s, October 27, 2014 – emphasis added] Illinois’ businesses and citizens are still struggling. The last thing we need is a massive rate increase to bail out Exelon nuclear plants built during the Nixon administration and already paid for several times by ratepayers. Even ComEd, Exelon’s own sister company, doesn’t agree with subsidized generation at above-market prices: “ComEd has long believed that competitive markets will work in the best interests of our customers…so we are concerned about the negative impact on our customers from a requirement that would force utilities to buy subsidized generation at above-market prices.” [Crain’s Chicago Business, November 20, 2013] Just Say No To Exelon’s $580 Million Rate Hike!!
|
Clean Energy Employs Nearly 100,000 Illinoisans; 9,000 More Next Year. How Many More Clean Energy Jobs Would Illinois Have If Springfield Did Its Job?
Wednesday, Nov 12, 2014 - Posted by Advertising Department [The following is a paid advertisement.] Nearly 100,000 workers in Illinois are employed in clean energy jobs. The clean energy industry – including renewable energy and energy efficiency – is roughly the size of Illinois’ real estate and accounting industries combined. Illinois’ clean energy industry is a growth-stage industry, with an average firm size of six employees and projected employment growth of 9% every year. Clean energy workers are manufacturing wind and solar equipment, building and operating clean energy projects and installing and upgrading energy efficiency systems. Thanks to these jobs, Illinois families and businesses are saving energy and cutting their electricity bills. No wonder voters overwhelmingly back clean energy:
• 75% see renewable energy and energy efficiency as secure, reliable and affordable. • More than 65% recognize renewable energy and energy efficiency as sources of job creation. • More than 68% recognize that renewable energy and energy efficiency stabilize or reduce energy costs. The message from Illinoisans is clear: Voters want legislators to prioritize voter-supported renewable energy and energy efficiency, supporting policies that maximize Illinois clean energy jobs. Data from survey conducted by a bipartisan research team of Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz & Associates (FM3) and Public Opinion Strategies. More info on this poll is available at ilenviro.org/cleanenergypoll.
|
Ride-sharing: Close the Insurance Gap that Leaves Everyone Vulnerable
Wednesday, Nov 12, 2014 - Posted by Advertising Department [The following is a paid advertisement.] The Illinois Insurance Association and the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America urge lawmakers to override Governor Pat Quinn’s veto of HB 4075 & 5331. While we support innovation and welcome new transportation choices in the marketplace, consumer safety is of utmost concern. It is vitally important that the vehicles used by commercial ride-sharing services are properly insured and the public protected in the event of an accident. HB 4075 and 5331 are needed in Illinois to clarify what insurance coverage is being provided and when. There should be a uniform statewide approach to protecting consumers to avoid the creation of a confusing and costly patchwork of local regulations. Without these bills, there will continue to be uncertainty whether there is proper coverage for injuries or damage arising out of an accident. Uber and Lyft supported statewide legislation in California and Colorado which requires primary insurance coverage from when the app is turned on until it is turned off. They should provide Illinoisans this same type of protection. Override the veto and provide clear consistent statewide rules that don’t leave policyholders or accident victims in the lurch because of coverage disputes.
|
Good morning!
Monday, Nov 10, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller * From “Where the Buffalo Roam”…
* One of the greatest and most profoundly honest songs ever written about the screwheads and the doomed… Will she ever stand a chance?
|
« NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |