Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Today’s number: 2.96 percent
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Today’s number: 2.96 percent

Thursday, Nov 19, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Tribune

Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s speed camera program improperly issued more than $2.4 million in fines to Chicago drivers, ticketing them when cameras were supposed to be off and when the required warning signs were confusing, obscured or missing, a Tribune investigation has found.

At the same time, City Hall has systematically ticketed drivers near schools without the legally required evidence of a schoolchild in sight. A Tribune random-sample analysis puts the number of those questionable tickets at about 110,000.

Here’s how they get that 110,000 number

A ticket-by-ticket review of 1,500 randomly chosen citations from school zones found no children were present in the photographic evidence for nearly a third of the cases, even though a child’s presence was required. That review suggests that about 110,000 tickets may have been issued without legal justification.

OK, maybe. But let’s say that’s correct.

* Now, scroll almost all the way to the end of the story

The speed camera program has doled out more than 2.1 million tickets, most of them warnings, along with more than $81 million in fines.

110,000 supposedly bad tickets out of 2.1 million total citations is a 5.2 percent error rate. And $2.4 million in supposedly bad fines out of $81 million in total fines is 2.96 percent.

       

33 Comments
  1. - Ghost - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 10:19 am:

    you can show school children are present by time of day…. i woukd rather erre on the side of making people aftaid to speed around schools then saying only break if you see a kid


  2. - Streator Curmudgeon - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 10:21 am:

    No mention of the Trib’s finding that caution lights were shortened near many of the cameras.


  3. - Harry - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 10:23 am:

    Yeah, as long YOU aren’t in that 5.2% who gets hit with a bad ticket and has to decide whether to go through the hoops to try to get it taken care of (and the City’s process is highly stacked against you) or just accept the risk to your insurance premium and if you get another ticket.

    If there’s no evidence of children present there should be no citation or warning issued–period. If the Trib can do that, so can the City. An error rate of maybe 0.5% would be acceptable., 5% is WAY too high and says they are being cavalier or, as everybody knows, just after the money.


  4. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 10:37 am:

    How many of those were for Rahm’s motorcade?


  5. - Mama - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 10:40 am:

    The Tribune did an investigation?


  6. - Mama - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 10:42 am:

    How many tickets did Rauner & his superstars get?


  7. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 10:44 am:

    Harry, I don’t necessarily disagree. I was just crunching some numbers that weren’t part of the story.

    Context is important. They sold a whole lotta sizzle in that lede.


  8. - DuPage - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 10:48 am:

    As the cop says to the motorist: We can’t catch them all, but we caught you. You WERE speeding.


  9. - Just Me - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 10:53 am:

    I have some sympathy for those that got tickets in error, but not a whole lot. Just obey the traffic laws and you won’t get a ticket. I live a block away from the camera mentioned in the article and drive past it all the time, and I’ve never received a ticket from any of these cameras.

    And to Harry: what is left out of the article is that over half of the people that appeal their tickets BY MAIL win their case.


  10. - Carhartt Representative - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 10:58 am:

    =you can show school children are present by time of day…. i woukd rather erre on the side of making people aftaid to speed around schools then saying only break if you see a kid=

    There’s nothing worse than driving along on a street with a 35 mph speed at 9pm at night, when the guy in front of you slams on the brakes because he noticed the school zone sign and doesn’t want to speed.


  11. - Soccermom - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 10:59 am:

    I got a ticket for cruising through a red light. I was on the way to my best friend’s funeral, and I absolutely did not see the light. Didn’t even slow down.

    There were no cars coming, and I would never have known I even did it if it weren’t for the red light cameras. When I got the ticket, I realized what I had done — and I realized how lucky I was that I didn’t hurt someone (including my daughter, who was with me in the car.)

    Thanks to the red light camera, I realized that it could be a deadly mistake to drive while I was so distracted. From now on, I will treat “driving while extremely distressed” like “driving while drunk” — i.e., get someone else to take the wheel.


  12. - anon - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 11:36 am:

    Good thing this wasn’t a Rauner initiative.


  13. - Anon221 - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 11:50 am:

    Just because there’s no children present, doesn’t mean the driver was still driving the legal limit at that time, 35 for instance. I’m sure readers have seen the “catch you” speed trap reports on the local news.


  14. - Anonymous - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 11:54 am:

    What in the world is so hard about not speeding and NOT blowing off red lights. I would also love to see a camera nail people who don’t use turn signals.


  15. - Anon - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 11:56 am:

    It is a complete racket to make money off of motorists. I received a ticket for violating a parking ordinance which was suspect. I challenged it because the ticket incorrectly indicated that my care was illegally parked 1-1/2 blocks North of its actual physical location.

    None of this mattered to the administrative law judge who had a quota to meet. The thing is to appeal the case to the Circuit Court costs six times as much as the fine. Even if you win, the nonrefundable court fee would cost more than paying the fine.


  16. - JoanP - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 11:59 am:

    @ Just Me: “I have some sympathy for those that got tickets in error, but not a whole lot. Just obey the traffic laws and you won’t get a ticket.”

    The whole point is that these people WERE obeying the traffic laws and got tickets anyway.


  17. - Anonymous - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 12:02 pm:

    Just because a child is not in the cameras view doesn’t mean a child isn’t present. Again, don’t speed where kids are likely to be.


  18. - Darren72 - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 12:07 pm:

    I have successfully contested three tickets thus far for which there was no child in sight. It’s a pain (though now I can just copy the same complaint letter for future use).

    The larger problem is that I shouldn’t be watching the sidewalks to see if there are children present. Or thinking about whether school is in session when I’m driving past a school. It’s far safer for me to simply drive 30 mph and focus on the road.

    We have a lot of great technology now. I’m favor of using technology to catch violations. But we could also be using technology to make the roads safer in the first place. For example, an electronic sign that just tells drivers that either school is in session and we should drive 20 mph or tells us that limit is 30 mph. That shouldn’t be hard to do.

    While we are at it, how about making the sign large? I find it strange that the school signs are smaller than the regular speed limit signs.


  19. - Anderson Villy - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 12:17 pm:

    =But we could also be using technology to make the roads safer in the first place=

    I think the ambiguity is the point (and as you argue, at the expense of safety).

    As an aside, apparently Chicago Administrative Law Judges interpret the language “school day” to mean “week day.” I got a school zone ticket going 30 mph past Lane Tech in MID JULY. Google revealed no summer school in session. My appeal was rejected.


  20. - the Patriot - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 12:19 pm:

    On one hand it is an extortion scheme to ticket people and make a very difficult process to prove they did nothing wrong because there is no witness to the crime. In many traffic cases the defense is more than the ticket.

    On the other hand, you live/work in Chicago and if this is the big anti bad government story you hang your hat on, you have issues.

    I just wonder why the City can’t put cameras on the streets the police won’t go to catch all the people getting shot, just sayin.


  21. - Anon - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 12:29 pm:

    It boggles the imagination to think of how much money Chicago manages to waste. Think of it, parking and traffic fines used to be routinely dismissed. The revenue streams from fines collected has sky rocketed. This was like found money as it was not so readily available to prior mayoral administrations. Nevertheless, Daley and Emanuel are still in debt despite rigorous collection activities.


  22. - nona - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 12:48 pm:

    Speeding in a school zone is a separate offense from plain old speeding. Couldn’t the City issue violations for simple speeding when no children are visible?


  23. - nona - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 12:49 pm:

    == the risk to your insurance premium ==

    These aren’t moving violations, are they? Aren’t they like red-light tickets, which do not count as points against a driver’s DL?


  24. - Ghost - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 1:06 pm:

    at least these people actually live or arenin chicago…. thats an improvement over the prior system where tickets went to people who were never there.


  25. - Jack Stephens - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 1:16 pm:

    Nothing in the Constitution about cars. Just guns and religion.


  26. - Amother blue canary - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 1:37 pm:

    The system was designed to make money period. The cameras were placed where they knew the most revenue would be generated not where the accidents occurred. Two I pssed every day are examples. One at the bottom of a hill just off the expressway and the other by a small religious school that has little or no student foot traffic. Cha-ching!


  27. - Jack Stephens - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 1:39 pm:

    Don’t children have 2nd Amendment Rights? Can’t they CC and defend themselves from Automobile Terrorists?


  28. - Angry Chicagoan - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 1:43 pm:

    That’s an unconscionably high error rate. It’s on the scale of credit card skimming. To put it another way, imagine the case load for the administrative judges if all those tickets are contested.


  29. - Cannon649 - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 1:46 pm:

    I feel the number and percent are too low. Just my gut. If it were double or triple would people be more upset? When the systems fails or is rigged in favor of the government how do we ever it get it right?

    In my opinion, this continues to expansion of Big Government - that is funding people and system that flawed.


  30. - Judgment Day (on the road) - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 1:48 pm:

    So a 5.2% error rate.

    The old rule in statistics is “68–95–99.7 rule” (actually; 68.27%, 95.45% and 99.73% of the values lie within one, two and three standard deviations of the mean, respectively).

    Link is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/68%E2%80%9395%E2%80%9399.7_rule

    If they have all this fancy red light camera technology and they still have a 5.2% error rate (that’s only 2 Sigma), there’s something seriously wrong.

    One out of every 20 is a failure? Maybe there should be a Consumer Products Safety Commission recall.

    Those folks got some issues with their technology.


  31. - thechampaignlife - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 2:55 pm:

    Maybe we can direct all the red light camera income to the CCAP. At least then it is not about greedy cops/judges/municipalities.


  32. - some doofus - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 3:04 pm:

    Context is important. There are still a couple unexplored issues.

    Are these all in reduced speed school zones? Or just school speed enforcement zones? If people were over the normal speed limit, I really don’t care whether there’s a kid present. Enforce the law. But if these are “20 mph on school days when children are present” and someone is getting a ticket for going 32 when children aren’t present, that’s a big deal.

    The frustrating thing to me about this and the last Trib “investigation” of ticket cameras is not only that they sold a lot of sizzle. But that they never even offered the best parts of the meat, not even in the last paragraph.


  33. - Crispy Critter - Thursday, Nov 19, 15 @ 3:48 pm:

    I can tell you that in St. Louis they have red light cameras and I got a ticket. I was turning right and there were 3 lanes. The lights turned green for the 3 lanes (which were bigger) and the turn light delayed 3 seconds. The 3 lights turned green and I started to go and click, I got a ticket then the turn light turned green. At the intersections that had no red light cameras, all the lights turned green at the same time. I fought it and lost. I say take them ALL out because we cannot trust the gov’t to use them reaponsibly.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the holidays
* And the winners are…
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Update to previous editions
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Report: Far-right Illinois billionaires may have skirted immigration rules
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards (Updated)
* Energy Storage Brings Cheaper Electricity, Greater Reliability
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller