Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » To the numbers…
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
To the numbers…

Friday, Jun 3, 2016 - Posted by Rich Miller

* But we have a state spending problem, right?

• Illinois ranks 28th among the 50 states and District of Columbia in per-capita state and local spending, according to 2012 data, the most recent available, compiled by the Tax Policy Center.

• Illinois ranks 38th in state-only per-capita spending, according to Fiscal Year 2014 data compiled by the Kaiser Family Foundation.

• Illinois ranks 28th in per-capita combined spending on education, health care, human services and public safety — the core services that make up 90 percent of state budgets — and 36th if you calculate that spending as a share of our gross domestic product, according to an analysis of fiscal year 2012 data by Chicago’s Center for Tax and Budget Accountability.

• Illinois ranks 45th in overall state spending as a share of GDP according to a analysis of 2014 data by the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

• Illinois ranks 49th in Medicaid spending per enrollee in a 2011 Kaiser Family Foundation report.

• Illinois ranks 23rd in the state taxes collected as a percentage of personal income and 15th in state taxes collected per capita, according to 2014 data compiled by the Federation of Tax Administrators.

• Illinois has the second-lowest state income tax rate among the eight states that levy a flat tax, and top earners in 38 states pay more state income tax than top earners in Illinois, according to 2016 charts published by the Federation of Tax Administrators.

Now, there are some important things to remember here. One is that relatively low state spending on K-12 is a serious driver of local property tax hikes. Another is that total state and local taxation is about the highest in the country. And while we do spend much less on Medicaid per enrollee, that comes at the cost of providers refusing to take Medicaid patients.

But, hey, even the governor recognizes that we have a very real state revenue problem. He isn’t pushing deep spending cuts at the state level, despite what you may read elsewhere. He wants economic reforms tied mainly to big state tax hikes and a local property tax freeze.

       

66 Comments
  1. - Angry Chicagoan - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 12:35 pm:

    And we have the second most regressive tax structure after Washington, a wealthy state with perennial budget crises. That needs to be dealt with, either through an expanded personal exemption combined with a higher rate (which I favor, as it wouldn’t need a constitutional amendment) or a graduated tax.


  2. - Honeybear - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 12:36 pm:

    YES YES YES YES!!!!!!! PRINT PRINT PRINT!!!!!! Oh God bless you. Johnie on the spot with the ammo!


  3. - 360 Degree TurnAround - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 12:38 pm:

    Does anyone know how many net employers have left the state? (serious question)


  4. - Ares - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 12:38 pm:

    Which Rauner do we believe? The “I’m an anti-tax kind of guy”, or the Governor who has not yet specified where the needed billions will come from?
    Moreover, does anybody know if Rauner has ever stood up to one of his crowd, outside of a private-equity deal where GTCR stood to make $$? Look forward to particulars.


  5. - Under Influenced - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 12:39 pm:

    == He isn’t pushing deep spending cuts at the state level==

    Really? 33% proposed cut to higher education isn’t considered deep spending cuts?


  6. - Joe M - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 12:41 pm:

    Excellent post. I’m going to bookmark it and refer it to all those who constantly whine that Illinois has a spending problem. However, I think the jury is still out on whether Rauner is or isn’t pushing deep spending cuts at the state level when it comes to higher ed. His FY 16 budget presentation called for 31% cuts to higher ed (and so far its a 70% cut) - and his FY 17 budget message called for 25% cuts.


  7. - Tournaround Agenda - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 12:44 pm:

    Perhaps he could achieve those “wants” more easily if he’d be honest with the people of Illinois, articulate the economic benefits of his wanted reforms (with specific numbers) and admit the tax hike will be necessary (at least in the short term). The constant tours around the state blaming Democrats for his own lack of leadership is tiring.


  8. - Chungas revenge - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 12:46 pm:

    Well we’re still number one in Governors and other politicians going to jail. So we got that going for us.


  9. - Shemp - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 12:48 pm:

    We are low on spending, but high on overall tax collection, so don’t get too excited folks. As Rich points out, it is some of the local property taxes hurting us. If the State raised income tax and came up with a fair formula to lower school property taxes, that would go a long way. But merely freezing property taxes isn’t going to fix the mess. Most municipal property tax growth has been tied to pension levies, and the locals don’t get to change the pension designs or employee contributions, only the State can do that. So yes, all this goes back to reforms, like it or not.


  10. - Truthteller - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 12:50 pm:

    No one should be making excuses for the Governor. He has not owned up to the fact that Illinois does not have enough revenue. If you can’t identify the problem, you can’t fix it. His turnaround agenda has nothing to do with our fiscal problems as has been pointed out repeatedly. Asking teachers, firefighters, cops, and tradespeople to take a pay cut so the governor can raise their taxes is a non-starter. Rauner is the Governor. The state needs more revenue, and Rauner, as the Governor, needs to own the tax increase


  11. - Anon - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 12:51 pm:

    ===Really? 33% proposed cut to higher education isn’t considered deep spending cuts?===

    It’s coming from a big bucket.


  12. - wordslinger - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 12:55 pm:

    –He wants economic reforms tied mainly to big state tax hikes and a local property tax freeze. –

    So he should get out there and sell it.

    Sell that big tax increase he wants — which will have some real, understandable data attached to it– and his “economic reforms,” which should have real, understandable data attached to them, if they are indeed economic reforms and not just a partisan wish-list.


  13. - Qui Tam - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 12:56 pm:

    The important part is that we have the lowest tax on services such as wealth management, yacht cleaning, valet service and dry cleaning.

    I pay more state tax for a bike tire than Ken Griffin pays to get his cars detailed.


  14. - RNUG - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:04 pm:

    Maybe instead of giving kill the government spending beast and kill the unions speeches, Rauner should look to his distant predecessor Richard Ogilvie and how the income tax was sold in place of all the other taxes.

    Redo the school funding plan to provide 60% (and don’t count the pension contribution in that 60%) with the local district rate set to provide 40%, cap the local school property tax at that level, limit that cap growth to trailing CPI or less, and figure what is needed to eliminate the annual State deficit spending, what is needed to “re-fi” the Edgar Ramp to level payments, toss in some retirement taxation, and come up with a flat rate plan and a graduated rate plan. Add a temporary 1/2% to pay off the $8B to $16B backlog of bills over a 5 to 10 year period. You could even decouple the corporate rate on either or both plans. And you would probably have to have a temporary flat rate plan as a stop-gap until the voters could approve a graduated plan. Then go sell it as the best action possible given the state’s financial condition.

    Previous Governors have sold tough plans. If Rauner is half the great salesman he claims to be, he should be able to sell this.


  15. - RNUG - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:06 pm:

    -word-

    Apparently we think somewhat. alike. I was typing my response at the same time you posted.


  16. - illlinifan - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:12 pm:

    RNUG and Wordslinger are nominated to head the committees to develop a plan to solve the problem.

    The MJM and BVR cage match could be a fundraising event on Pay per view with proceeds to pay down the debt. That is where their behavior belongs.


  17. - Tone - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:13 pm:

    Illinois has the 4th highest state and local tax burden in the country.


  18. - Joe M - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:13 pm:

    =====Really? 33% proposed cut to higher education isn’t considered deep spending cuts?===
    It’s coming from a big bucket. ==

    No, that bucket for higher ed has gotten a lot smaller over the years. For example in FY02, WIU received state appropriations of $64.3 million. In FY15, WIU received state appropriations of $51.2 million.


  19. - lake county democrat - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:14 pm:

    Pensions aren’t state spending?


  20. - 47th Ward - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:15 pm:

    According to whom, Tone? I’ve seen it as high as 5th, as low as 10th. Nowhere have I seen Illinois ranked as high as 4th for state/local tax burden.


  21. - Joe M - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:15 pm:

    A statistic the article should have also included: Illinois has the fewest state employees per capita of the 50 states.


  22. - Tone - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:16 pm:

    Zorn is purposefully being deceptive


  23. - Spliff - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:16 pm:

    Elimination of prevailing wage and Right-to-work are not economic reforms!


  24. - Sangamo Sam - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:20 pm:

    Rauner has no interest in ending this. We’ve heard him say again that he’ll only DISCUSS tax hikes/tax reform AFTER his turnaround agenda is in place. What’s to stop him from playing more hardball even if you pass his agenda?

    Maybe he also has a Plan B.

    First you make it seem like a political battle of wills and bash the bad guys about the Turnaround Agenda. If it passes great, but either way you keep playing hardball.

    You refuse to raise taxes no matter what. Businesses struggle because the State isn’t paying them their due. These businesses are ripe for the picking say if you got a few billion lying around. Your buddy Ken Griffin said he likes “finding opportunities when trouble hits markets” and boy is there ever trouble.

    Then that nasty AFSCME contract limits subcontracting and pays these lazy good for nothings way too much. When contract becomes null and void and state workers are out on the street business opportunities abound! And look, GTCR holds a company that is a healthcare provider for prisoners. What a coincidence! My goodness and they have IT, contingent worker and procurement services too? What are the chances?

    You don’t give a fig about the pain you inflicted because you know big money is to be made and you’re just the guy to do it.


  25. - Anonymous - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:21 pm:

    With IL property taxes second highest, total state and local taxes likely the highest, and Chicago’s sales tax the highest of a large city, people are feeling the affect on their pocketbook but not seeing comparatively great returns for their taxes.


  26. - @MisterJayEm - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:28 pm:

    “Illinois has the 4th highest state and local tax burden in the country.”

    “Zorn is purposefully being deceptive”

    Unsupported assertions are unsupported.

    – MrJM


  27. - Chicago 20 - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:29 pm:

    Another great article from Eric Zorn.

    The middle class of Illinois are overburdened with regressive taxes.

    Eliminating these regressive taxes on the middle class will grow Illinois economy for the benefit of everyone.


  28. - Gruntled University Employee - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:32 pm:

    Tone @ 1:13pm

    Here’s a fun fact for you, 87% of all statistics are made up on the spot to support a person’s argument.


  29. - PalumbrasWay - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:35 pm:

    Zorn is intentionally misleading for the sake argument (as usual). Who seriously looks at 2011 Medicaid spend data pre-Obamacare expansion? What a joke.


  30. - Annoyed - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:36 pm:

    Let’s remember our property tax rates before we say anything else.


  31. - Jimmy baseball - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:38 pm:

    ==He isn’t pushing deep spending cuts at the state level, despite what you may read elsewhere.==

    It’s difficult to tell exactly what he’s pushing considering he has yet to introduce a balanced budget.


  32. - RNUG - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:38 pm:

    == Illinois has the 4th highest state and local tax burden in the country. ==

    And if you read what I wrote, I proposed lowering local property taxes and pretty much freezing them in exchange for statewide taxes and expansion of the tax base.


  33. - Captain Illini - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:40 pm:

    Tone…
    97% of your posts are worthless, but at least there is consensus.


  34. - RNUG - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:41 pm:

    == RNUG and Wordslinger are nominated to head the committees to develop a plan to solve the problem. ==

    I’d rather try to herd cats.


  35. - an independent - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:43 pm:

    Here I go again, I know. The answer my friends is blowing in the wind. The wind is blowing “progressive income tax”. 34 states have one, their schools will open on time. Also, the District of Columbia and the Federal Government have one.


  36. - Earnest - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:43 pm:

    >He isn’t pushing deep spending cuts at the state level, despite what you may read elsewhere. He wants economic reforms tied mainly to big state tax hikes and a local property tax freeze.

    I think the deliberate destruction of the higher education and social service systems represents a push for deep spending cuts. I see evidence of him wanting to destroy tings, but I don’t see evidence of him wanting specific reforms. It would be comforting to agree with your perceptions though.


  37. - Anonymous - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:45 pm:

    == Pensions aren’t state spending? ==

    They are, but for the purposes of the support level, I don’t think they should be counted as part of the State’s contribution to the schools. It’s not baked in as a school district expense, and point is to get more state support to the school districts so they aren’t as dependent on the local property taxes and can lower them.


  38. - East Central Illinois - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:46 pm:

    @ Tone . . . . At least you are consistent. Wrong, but consistent.


  39. - JS Mill - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:47 pm:

    =And if you read what I wrote, I proposed lowering local property taxes and pretty much freezing them in exchange for statewide taxes and expansion of the tax base.=

    This is very similar to the plan Martire has offered for some time. I support much of the plan, if not all.

    @RNUG- There is no doubt that you know your stuff. In my opinion You are always reasonable and put a great deal of careful thought into your opinions. That is much appreciated.

    The only thing that scares me is a cap on property taxes. My reasoning- The state has, historically, been unreliable as a source for consistent funding for schools (and many, many others). To cap the tax without a way out if the state fails to uphold it’s commitment could be an even greater disaster.

    There should be some out clause for schools etc. if funding does not come through. I would prefer no mandatory cap, allow local government to make good decisions. If the do not, the voters can make a change.

    = Most municipal property tax growth has been tied to pension levies=

    That statement may be true if you are applying it to city/county government. It is not true for schools.


  40. - RNUG - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:52 pm:

    1:45pm was I


  41. - James Knell - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:52 pm:

    Thanks for the reality check on the stats, Rich.


  42. - RNUG - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:53 pm:

    == = Most municipal property tax growth has been tied to pension levies=

    That statement may be true if you are applying it to city/county government. It is not true for schools. ==

    When 90% of my tax bill is for various schools, that is where you attack the problem.


  43. - Tone - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 1:56 pm:

    Keep your collective heads in the sand. Illinois is in a death spiral that higher taxes won’t cure.


  44. - JS Mill - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 2:00 pm:

    @RNUG- I agree with yor statement on the percentage of your tax bill that goes to schools.

    The statement about the pension made by a previous poster, as it applies to schools, is still wrong.

    Tier 2 has caused our pension payment to decrease.

    Not every district has had as many retirements followed by replacement with Tier 2 personnel as we have, and some may have more.

    Salaries and benefits are the single biggest driver of our budget since we mostly spend on people. Yes, the pension is a part of that but health care cost increases have outstripped the increases in any other category. We share the increases with our staff, but that has been the area of greatest increase. I feel confident most schools would tell you the same thing.


  45. - JS Mill - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 2:01 pm:

    =Keep your collective heads in the sand. Illinois is in a death spiral that higher taxes won’t cure. =

    And you go ahead and stay under your bridge.


  46. - Louis Capricious - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 2:05 pm:

    === economic reforms ===

    As Rich noted quite succinctly, the ROI on such “reforms” is minuscule at best. And, by ROI, we’re referring strictly to new revenue that may occur as a result of those changes.

    Then there’s the so-called ROI as it relates to the lives of working people - lower wages, diminished quality of life, likely loss of jobs to out-of-staters willing to work for far less, fewer workers eligible for workers’ comp, etc. Any consideration of the supposed ROI must account for the impact on real people’s lives. But the governor doesn’t/won’t talk about that.

    Generic “reform” sounds dandy and it polls well. What doesn’t poll as well is obliterating organized labor, decimating worker protections under workers’ comp, cutting wages (and putting Illinois workers at a competitive disadvantage) by repealing prevailing wage, and suppressing worker wages by making it far more difficult for individuals to organize and collectively advocate.

    It’s real simple: Why wasn’t the governor straight about his intentions during the general election campaign, and why isn’t he being straight about them now? Because people in Illinois, by and large, do not want what he wants. If in fact the voting public was clamoring to crush the unions, etc., don’t you think that’s exactly what the governor would be talking publicly about? Of course he would.

    But he’s not. And there’s a reason for that.


  47. - @MisterJayEm - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 2:08 pm:

    “Keep your collective heads in the sand.”

    If you want your claims to be taken seriously, you need to support them with reliable citations or a rigorous logical defense. Don’t just assert your claims, argue for them. Otherwise you’re just engaging in empty sloganeering.

    – MrJM


  48. - Tone - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 2:09 pm:

    I love it, ignore the fact that Illinois has the 4th highest state and local tax burden and it lost 100,000 people to other states last year. Higher taxes will certainly fix it, right?


  49. - 47th Ward - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 2:15 pm:

    ===the fact that Illinois has the 4th highest state and local tax burden===

    You haven’t established that as a fact yet. It’s only an assertion at this point.


  50. - nixit - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 2:15 pm:

    ==A statistic the article should have also included: Illinois has the fewest state employees per capita of the 50 states.==

    How many of those “state” employees in other states are working at the local level in Illinois? For example, my small township has around 20 senior service workers and case managers. At what level are these folks employed in other states, state or local?


  51. - Ares - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 2:17 pm:

    At least RNUG has a starting point.
    An Ogilvie is badly needed, but it appears only a bone-shaking thrashing at the polls this November (or the loss of the Governor’s personal net worth) will prod the Governor to move in that direction.


  52. - Ahoy! - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 2:36 pm:

    Those numbers listed above are a little over the map and not apples to apples comparisons but the general concept is right, we do have a revenue problem, but we also have both a short & long term debt issue. Both in un-budgeted mandated expenditures, pensions & the back-log of unpaid bills.

    This is where Madigan & Rauner need to make a deal, but it seems like Madigan is resistant. So what do we do? Just raise taxes and ignore everything else until Madigan finally goes away?


  53. - anon - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 2:38 pm:

    As a percent of income, Illinois taxes do not rate as high.


  54. - Ducky LaMoore - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 2:39 pm:

    ===Keep your collective heads in the sand. Illinois is in a death spiral that higher taxes won’t cure.===

    Then leave already! Geez. If I thought I lived in a place that was “in a death spiral,” I would get gone. I think Illinois is a great place to work, live and raise a family. I just wish my government could be functional.


  55. - Tone - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 3:14 pm:

    Trying to improve the place. If it weren’t for the city of Chicago, I we would have left a long time ago.


  56. - atsuishin - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 3:14 pm:

    It is a fact that Illinois has the highest property tax, in cook and chicago highest sales and parking in the united states. plus enormous fees and fines which or not counted as “taxes” but effectively are. Our government is bloated and incompetent I do not want pay anymore in taxes to it. I also do not understand this view that its somehow “cheap” to live in Illinois and we have it good here. someone must have forgotten to tell this to the +100K who evacuated the state last year. TX and TN Washington state and others manage to have low taxes why can’t illinois?


  57. - WETHEPEOPLE - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 3:16 pm:

    One heck of an attribute to hang your hat on. Way to go Rauner! Where will we be when at the end of your administration?


  58. - atsuishin - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 3:29 pm:

    ==If I thought I lived in a place that was “in a death spiral,” I would get gone.==

    some of us have family ties and cannot leave even though we would like to. Not everyone has the luxury of pulling up the stakes.


  59. - AnonymousOne - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 3:32 pm:

    If this TA hadn’t been slipped in there after he was elected………….Where is the demand for real facts, statistics and support for Rauner’s reforms. Why would anyone agree with his plan if his plan is one big secret?

    As to the middle class being overburdened with taxes, isn’t that what a graduated tax would go towards fixing? Isn’t that why the millionaire tax vote overwhelmingly passed? Looking for ways to get more revenue from the same people (who are overburdened now) isn’t going to work. People talk about the millionaires leaving the state? How about middle class people leaving the state? Why no concern about them since they’re paying the bulk of taxes now?

    People probably don’t object that much to a fair increase. But working families are stretched. Time for some help from those in a better financial situation.


  60. - Say no to big government - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 3:35 pm:

    Comparing Illinois to other states and then concluding the State does not have a spending problem is fraught with problems. What if a large number of states are overspending? To throw out bullet points like that without digging into the numbers can lead to false conclusions and ultimately some bad decisions. Illinois has a spending problem because it spends more money that it brings in. If I did the same, but so did 50% of the population, could I conclude I don’t have a spending problem? Now solving that spending problem doesn’t necessarily mean the only solution is to reduce spending, but Illinois has a spending problem and how we compare to other states is irrelevant.


  61. - 47th Ward - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 3:42 pm:

    ===Illinois has a spending problem===

    The real problem is that Illinois has a lot of people, especially children, who live in poverty. It has a lot of students who need an education, a lot of people who get sick and need care, a lot of people who get caught up in the criminal justice system, and a lot of people who need government services.

    Your handle sort of gives you away, but what you’re really saying is we need to stop helping so many people. Own it.


  62. - Formerly Known As... - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 3:54 pm:

    ==Nowhere have I seen Illinois ranked as high as 4th for state/local tax burden.==

    Illinois has the highest effective state and local tax burden in 2016. Number one.

    https://wallethub.com/edu/best-worst-states-to-be-a-taxpayer/2416/#detailed


  63. - RNUG - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 3:55 pm:

    == An Ogilvie is badly needed, but it appears only a bone-shaking thrashing at the polls this November (or the loss of the Governor’s personal net worth) will prod the Governor to move in that direction. ==

    Ares, at this point I don’t think that would be enough. I’m envisioning it will take something out of the 19th century: irate citizens, boiling cauldrons of tar, plus some buckets of feathers and a rail.


  64. - Formerly Known As... - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 4:00 pm:

    Perdón. Illinois has the highest effective state and local tax rate as of 2016.

    State and local tax burden could be lower than first. State and local tax rate is first.


  65. - 47th Ward - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 4:06 pm:

    Ok, thanks. I’d seen the info on Wallethub and couldn’t decipher it. Your link was helpful.

    The non-partisan Tax Foundation may or may not be a better source than Wallethub. It ranks Illinois 5th.

    http://taxfoundation.org/state-tax-climate/illinois

    And Forbes took a look at Wallethub’s data, then factored in tax rates as a percentage of income by state, and found Illinois ranked 10th highest tax burden.

    Here’s a handy chart:

    http://blogs-images.forbes.com/niallmccarthy/files/2016/06/20160602_Tax.jpg


  66. - Formerly Known As... - Friday, Jun 3, 16 @ 4:33 pm:

    Thanks for those, @47th. Another Wallethub one on ==state tax burden==, not including local taxes, has Illinois tenth like Forbes. They might be the same data.

    https://wallethub.com/edu/states-with-highest-lowest-tax-burden/20494/


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Rides For Moms Provides Transportation To Prenatal Care
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Rivian announces $1.5 billion investment in Normal facility, Pritzker talks about incentives
* Support House Bill 4781
* Another budget pressure point (Updated)
* Showcasing The Retailers Who Make Illinois Work
* Question of the day
* Credit Unions: A Smart Financial Choice for Illinois Consumers
* $117.7B Economic Impact: More Than Healthcare Providers, Hospitals Are Economic Engines
* A fun night for all, House wins interchamber softball game
* It’s just a bill
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Post-Bears meeting react
* House Republicans protest referendum, vote present
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller