Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x1 *** $47.121 billion backlog projected
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 *** $47.121 billion backlog projected

Wednesday, Nov 16, 2016 - Posted by Rich Miller

* The Governor’s budget office has published its latest five-year fiscal projection. Click here. And click here for a more complete explanation and background.

If things continue down this same path (with the same levels of taxation and spending patterns), GOMB projects a total bill backlog of more than $47 billion by Fiscal Year 2022.

Oof.

* The projected fiscal year backlogs are as follows…

2017 $13.543 billion
2018 $20.639 billion
2019 $27.692 billion
2020 $34.103 billion
2021 $40.593 billion
2022 $47.121 billion

…Adding… Here is where we are as of today. We’ve broken the $10 billion mark…


*** UPDATE ***  From SEIU Healthcare, with emphasis added by me…

Hi all,

Today the Governor’s Office of Management and Budget published its economic and fiscal policy report and five-year projections. Below are some summary points.

These are required to be published every year by law, as a prelude to the budget, in order to set out the “economic and fiscal policy objectives of the State” in the coming year and beyond. This year is the first year that they were moved up from January to November, and the first year the projections are for five years rather than three. (Last year’s report will be remembered for the headline that the state’s bill backlog was projected to reach $25 billion by the end of 2019.)

This year, the news is just as bad: The report shows clearly the damage the Rauner administration has done to the state budget and economy, and declares Rauner’s intention to continue the hostage situation with the state budget to pursue his ideological agenda and damage working families.

Some highlights:

    - Declares that the Rauner administration will double down on a hostage-taking approach to the budget. The only mention of Governor Rauner actually getting a budget done is prefaced by “If the legislature is willing to enact adequate structural reforms…” There is no definition of what are “adequate structural reforms,” and no evidence given for the claim that these “reforms” will induce miraculous growth in the Illinois economy.

    - Projects that the state’s bill backlog will grow to $27.7 billion by the end of 2019, rather than the previous projection of $25.0 billion. Through Rauner’s hostage-taking on budget and revenue, the state is digging this hole faster. By the end of 2022, this bill backlog is projected to grow to $47.1 billion. That is more than one full year of state operating expenditures.

    - Observes that Illinois’ economy has performed poorly in the past 1-2 years, but refuses to even consider that this might have something to do with the protracted crisis and uncertainty Rauner has caused by refusing to sign a budget. (For example, nonfarm employment grew by less than half the national average, 12,700 manufacturing jobs left the state, and job growth has been in low-wage sectors, over the year from August 2015 to August 2016.)

    - Includes a full page on the “stopgap” spending plan passed at the 11th hour this June that declares it a success by not mentioning the “limited” General Funds appropriations meant many human service providers are taking a 33% or higher cut, resulting in a continued wave of closures and no rebuilding whatsoever of these vital services since the stopgap was signed into law; and not mentioning at all the much deeper cuts to higher education and MAP grants that have state universities on the verge of collapse.

    - In a list of problem areas that “crowd out” other state spending, misidentifies home care for seniors as a problem area. Home care for seniors has grown because it is a preferred care setting for tens of thousands more seniors in a growing senior population, and it has saved the state at least as much as it has cost by preventing the need to pay for costly institutional care. (Overall, the categories of spending called out in this section are highly selective and problematic. Home care for seniors might only be the most absurd example.)

       

59 Comments
  1. - yeah - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:27 am:

    Compounding interest…it is a witch.


  2. - Ducky LaMoore - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:27 am:

    http://www.dictionary.com/browse/malfeasance


  3. - Honeybear - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:28 am:

    I’ll say it again.
    Venture Capitalists
    Buy it
    Break it
    Sell it

    Governing will happen. Government will cease. Total private sector takeover. Only the Legislature controlling contracts with the private sector. What that surprises you?

    Totally where we are headed.


  4. - Lech W - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:29 am:

    This trend really needs a turnaround !


  5. - anon - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:30 am:

    Can the fiscal conservatives kindly explain again why Illinois has a spending problem, not a revenue problem?


  6. - Highland Il - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:31 am:

    It’s almost as if someone should do something about this issue. /s


  7. - Rogue Roni - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:36 am:

    Maybe someone in leadership should Illinois Prompt Payment Act.


  8. - 47th Ward - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:36 am:

    I’m pretty sure Rauner will find a willing partner in Madigan whenever he decides its time to raise more revenue.

    This reminds me of the Seinfeld episode when Kramer takes the car for a test ride and he and the salesman see how far they can go before running out of gas. I’m pretty sure Rauner is Kramer in this example.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuEdU_lrtZk


  9. - Bleugrass Boy - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:39 am:

    “Raunie, you’re doing a heck of a job!” - voters


  10. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:43 am:

    That GOMB sure can do some far-out into the future cipherin.

    So…. why can’t they provide projections on the economic and fiscal benefits of the governor’s agenda?

    I kid. They can. The results just aren’t a selling point.

    If they were, we would have seen them long ago.


  11. - The Captain - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:46 am:

    If the Comptroller’s office is reading this (or Comptroller-elect) it would be a great feature to add to search that backlog by date. I’d love to know what it was on 1/11/15, the day before the Governor was inaugurated.


  12. - walker - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:47 am:

    Hate to say it again, but Quinn and allies, were on track to completely eliminate the backlog by 2018, and pay off the pension debt conservatively by 2030.

    But style over substance, and economic myths before real numbers. That’s how we roll in our democracy.


  13. - The Dude Abides - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:47 am:

    Our bill backlog has increased by $6 billion in the short time that Rauner has been Governor and at the present course will be over $20 billion by the time Rauner comes up for reelection. How in the world can you defend that record with the voters? The answer to that question will be to blame it all on Madigan obviously.

    Governors need to lead by building consensus, making compromises and doing what is necessary to improve the well being of the state. The Governor relishes doing battle with Madigan, it’s a game to him but he is killing the state. We have to have a fully funded, balanced budget before Summer.

    Durkin said yesterday that many Democrats are eager to have a fully funded budget. I’m not sure what he meant by that. Was he saying that many Republicans aren’t eager for the impasse to end? I would guess that many GOP members are as eager for a solution as the Democrats are.


  14. - X-prof - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:52 am:

    @Honeybear, I’m with you, but please read my post under the Pritzker item. Rauner is not a venture capitalist; he’s a leveraged buy out artist. They are very different. Know your opponent well!


  15. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:53 am:

    Captain, the backlog was $4.4 billion in the comptroller’s report for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2014.

    It had been nearly $10 billion at the height of the recession, but was whittled down during Quinn’s tenure.

    Remember when Republicans used to talk about fiscal responsibility? Now they’re “reformers,” which is whatever you want it to be or, more accurately, nothing at all.


  16. - Birdseed - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:53 am:

    === - walker - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:47 am:

    Hate to say it again, but Quinn and allies, were on track to completely eliminate the backlog by 2018, and pay off the pension debt conservatively by 2030. ===

    I get that. But if Quinn and allies knew it would take until 2030, why did they put the sunset provision in the tax increase? Nevermind, I know the answer. Gutless wonders….


  17. - The Captain - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 10:58 am:

    @Wordslinger - thanks!


  18. - Last Bull Moose - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:04 am:

    The forecast used to project the numbers assumed slow growth to reflect the likelihood of a recession. When a recession hits, the numbers will be worse.

    The financially unsustainable is hitting the politically immovable. Which gives?


  19. - 47th Ward - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:07 am:

    ===Gutless wonders===

    Speaking of which, as WS already pointed out, why can’t GOMB show these projections alongside the projections if the TA was enacted?

    In other words, if we do nothing, the projected shortfall will be $47.121 billion in six years. If the TA is enacted, the projected shortfall will be $X.

    Isn’t that their job? How long do we have to wait for them to tell us the impact of the TA?


  20. - T Sowell - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:08 am:

    Let’s give AFSCME what they want - that will fix this Right ?


  21. - JS Mill - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:09 am:

    @Word and Walker-

    Well put gentlemen, very well put!

    I think you guys are great at condensing these things and articulating factual information.

    Quinn was a bumbler in many ways, but he made the tough choices that, had they been sustained, would have been good for Illinois. Those are usually the guys that get shown the door thought he was often his own worst enemy.

    Current governor- actions vs. words.


  22. - Michael Westen - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:12 am:

    $47 billion. It will take a lot of volunteers replacing AFSCME workers to make up that amount of money.


  23. - Jocko - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:17 am:

    You gotta love how Rauner & Co give themselves more disposable income to the detriment of Illinois…then act surprised (nay outraged!) when debt piles up.


  24. - Hottot - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:20 am:

    The ONLY way this state will get out of debt is to increase taxes, and decrease spending, then all of the unused revenue must be put towards the debt, paying off the smallest bills first. Love him or hate him, when Pat Quinn was governor, our backlog of overdue bills went from $9 billion when he took office, to $3 billion when he left office. Who was in office the whole time Quinn was? Michael Madigan. Rauner can’t blame Madigan for this. His refusal to negotiate on the budget until his demands are met is the very essence of what occurs in a hostage situation. Rauner is holding the state hostage to get the demands he wants met. He can’t blame Madigan for this. He campaigned on the tax increase ending, then said the state has to make reforms because it couldn’t pay it’s bills. Then he made this list of demands he wanted met before he would consider a budget. This mess is Rauner’s baby.


  25. - Big Joe - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:21 am:

    Wasn’t it Rauner that pleaded with the Legislature to not extend the 5% tax during the Lame Duck session before his inauguration? Why do people just continue to ignore that fact when it comes down to the increasing backlog of bills/debt? Say it, and keep saying it.


  26. - Anon221 - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:22 am:

    Today’s program is not posted yet, but it will be a good one to listen to on the 21st concerning what service providers are going through. Some intakes for victims of abuse are up to 12 weeks. These are the Rauner Cuts to the budget(s) and these are his Reforms.

    http://nprillinois.org/programs/21st

    You can check your local Illinois NPR station, too, to see when The 21st plays in your area.


  27. - Earnest - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:23 am:

    >Isn’t that their job? How long do we have to wait for them to tell us the impact of the TA?

    I think we’ll have to wait until the Illinois Democratic Party has a coherent message that makes this an issue getting press coverage. Given that the reality started as Rauner refusing to handle the budget until his preconditions were met and was willing to let things go down the drain until he did and that yesterday’s coverage sounded more like Madigan had a precondition to ignore the TA until a budget is done, they have a long ways to go.


  28. - Handle Bar Mustache - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:23 am:

    Apples to apples…

    Rauner’s projected backlog:

    2017 $13.5 billion
    2018 $20.6 billion
    2019 $27.6 billion

    Quinn’s projected backlog:

    2017 $3.3 billion
    2018 $3.0 billion
    2019 $2.2 billion

    Sheesh.


  29. - P Krugman - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:23 am:

    @T Sowell. Let’s just fire all state employees. . . that’ll fix this RIGHT?


  30. - Anon - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:25 am:

    Hmm didn’t Rauner run on a campaign of helping our economy?

    After the recession our backlog reached a high of $6.8 billion in 2012.. and under Quinn it had been reduced to $3.6 billion –which it was when Rauner took office.

    So under Rauner, without a budget, he has managed to triple the backlog to new heights it never reached under democratic leadership…


  31. - Earnest - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:26 am:

    >…Adding… Here is where we are as of today. We’ve broken the $10 billion mark…

    This might be on the way to more leverage than even Rauner wants.


  32. - Really? - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:27 am:

    Another stopgap will only make those numbers worse.


  33. - Team Sleep - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:28 am:

    Big Joe - so?! Cullerton and Madigan could have muscled through extensions. Cullerton’s caucus especially would have been an easier sell given that they had 40 members at the end of 2014. Why did Cullerton and Madigan acquiesce? They “listened” to then Governor-elect Rauner so that they could immediately put him in a trick box. Period. And now here we are.

    That would be same as President-elect Trump asking outing President Obama to rescind a controversial executive order. President Obama has no reason to listen or care.

    Rep. Will Davis’s bill is now critical. If all sides are interested in saving some face and not jacking up taxes to historic levels then they have to act on Rep. Davis’s proposal.


  34. - Hit or Miss - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:34 am:

    What I do not understand is why the various vendors continue to provide the state with goods and services. They know that they will not be paid for months and that the delay in payment is costly to them. Is it not time for vendors to help ’solve’ the late payment issue by stopping doing business with the State of Illinois and start doing business with someone else who will pay them promptly?


  35. - Lucky Pierre - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:36 am:

    Voters have long memories and don’t like being lied to.

    When you tell them we need to pass a temporary income tax increase that will allow the state to pay its bills and begin to sunset in 4 years they expect the lawmakers to keep their word and follow through with the necessary cuts and reforms that would require.

    The Speaker’s long standing practice of doing of a temporary fix of huge systemic problems is coming back to haunt us again.

    They sold the tax increase as bait and switch and
    we are paying the price for that now.

    The Democrats have had ample time to make their case for revenue reform before and after Rauner to make the tax code fairer- graduated income tax, services, retirement income etc.

    Their continued inaction on this and reform of state government and our business climate is a colossal failure.


  36. - Romeo - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:47 am:

    Yet another reason for those with the means to leave the state. It’s tough…I have family and friends who live here, along with a house and job. But with potential kid on the way, there’s no way that I can justify staying here when it’s just going to be economically horrible.


  37. - Illinois O'Malley - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:48 am:

    @Lucky— Rauner ran on the position that he could balance the budget with the 3.75% income tax. Don’t you think it’s time Rainer presents it?


  38. - Anon221 - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:49 am:

    Hit or Miss- Not sure what the status is currently of this program, but delayed payments can be income makers for some companies.

    http://northernpublicradio.org/post/more-600-million-illinois-debt-isnt-processed-through-comptrollers-office


  39. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:55 am:

    ==It had been nearly $10 billion at the height of the recession, but was whittled down during Quinn’s tenure.==

    The bill backlog was around $8.5B right before the tax hike. Once Quinn left, it was “whittled” down to $4.4B as you stated. 4 years, $30B+ collected from the hike, yet only $4B whittled? I understand he made pension payments with some of that extra revenue, but did he resize the budget over those 4 years? Did he cut expenses to match the revenue based on the income tax rates at the time or the 2015 rate? Sure looks like he didn’t.


  40. - Rod - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 11:56 am:

    47th Ward I thought you were a progressive Democrat, I assume you are aware that Seinfeld is in part owned by Stephen K. Bannon of team Trump. See http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/trumps-new-campaign-guru-stephen-920367


  41. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 12:04 pm:

    ===yet only $4B whittled? I understand he made pension payments with some of that extra revenue, but did he resize the budget over those 4 years?===

    Some? Try almost all. And yes, Medicaid was cut too, among other things. Ask the higher ed folks, for instance.


  42. - Lucky Pierre - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 12:04 pm:

    Illinois O’Malley- Rauner has supported new revenues for the past 22 months. Stop it with the misdirection and obfuscation, you are not fooling anyone.

    The Governor has said if Democrats think all we need is a tax increase and no reforms they should pass one.

    Rauner has said he will raise taxes if we get some badly needed reforms which have been necessary for decades but continue to get held up in the rules committee by the Speaker.

    Just this week the Speaker said the Governor is interested in revenue and pension reform.

    Strange how the Speaker said it like that. Any responsible legislator that noticed our unfunded pension debt went up by 20 billion dollars would be interested in revenue and pension reform.

    The fact that Speaker did not say he was speaks volumes.


  43. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 12:13 pm:

    The IPI is Rauner’s Breitbart.
    Don’t expect the mainstream media to explain how bad Rauner has messed up Illinois’ economy.
    Rauner knows that he can spend millions and distort the truth.. and blame Madigan and Quinn.
    But alas, a well-funded opponent will help.


  44. - Nick Name - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 12:23 pm:

    “Let’s give AFSCME what they want - that will fix this Right ?”

    AFSCME supported the temporary tax hike — the tax hike with which Quinn was paying down the bill backlog and the pension deficit.


  45. - bothanspy - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 12:32 pm:

    I haven’t had a chance to read through all the details in the document, but that negative growth sure seems extraordinarily linear. Are they really expecting to offset that much interest year over year?


  46. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 12:35 pm:

    The temporary tax hike was to pay doen the backlog. The prnsion reform was to lower the cost of pensions. But the pension reform got thrown out, so the temporary tax hike had to do double duty. It was not intended to pay the backlog and the pension bill. We ar3 in a deeper hole than anyone expected in 2010, and too many people are more focused on pointing fingers and winning news cycles than on fixing state government. Sheesh.


  47. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 12:37 pm:

    –Just this week the Speaker said the Governor is interested in revenue and pension reform.–

    And just today the governor changed his mind about his priorities.

    Check your in-box for new chanting points.


  48. - Molly Maguire - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 12:37 pm:

    I like how they carried out the dollar figure to the penny to make it look even bigger.


  49. - Lucky Pierre - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 12:54 pm:

    Governor is still interested in pension reform Wordslinger and extra money for CPS is contingent on it.


  50. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 12:59 pm:

    –…and extra money for CPS is contingent on it.–

    LOL, “extra money?” Did you read the post?


  51. - Liberty - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 1:10 pm:

    The obvious question is where are the revenue projections if his turnaround agenda is passed?


  52. - Liberty - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 1:14 pm:

    I noticed his graphs claim “pension benefits are up” of course everyone knows pension payments are up while the benefits remain the same.

    Also the rising insurance costs include interest on the unpaid bills…


  53. - Illinois O'Malley - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 1:33 pm:

    @Lucky– where was the new revenue bill by Rauner you talk about? Oh that’s right, in his left pocket that ‘Deflecting’ Guy told us about yesterday…


  54. - RNUG - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 1:37 pm:

    == What I do not understand is why the various vendors continue to provide the state with goods and services. ==

    Actually, a lot of vendors have cut the state off, including some you might think would just ride it out and collect the interest. But they take a risk in dropping out, because the state purchasers may never come back to them again.

    In some cases, the State has managed to find new vendors, mostly from large national chains, to replace the smaller and mom & pop suppliers who have dropped out. The big boys can more easily wait for their money, although they have their limits also. The State hasn’t burned through every possible vendor YET … but I can see that day coming in a year or so.

    In other cases, mid-level state employees spend their entire day on the phone begging and pleading to keep suppliers sending goods and services. They don’t have a lot to offer the vendors, other than trying to get some of the past payments processed as emergencies through the Comptroller’s Office. That, by the way, is why the loss of the Comptroller’s Office in the recent election IS a big deal; the administration will lose some of that flexibility to shuffle “critical” vendors to the front of the line.


  55. - Honeybear - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 2:27 pm:

    RNUG- How long do you think those midlevel management can keep it up. Not much longer I think. They’ll leave state service very soon.


  56. - Anon221 - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 3:03 pm:

    RNUG- “In other cases, mid-level state employees spend their entire day on the phone begging and pleading to keep suppliers sending goods and services.”

    Not snark to you RNUG, snark to Rauner and Co.-

    What accounting code does begging and pleading fall under???

    What a waste of mind and time power! Not to mention stress levels of these employees and the staff at some of the State locations.


  57. - Whatever - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 4:48 pm:

    Lucky Pierre @ 12:04 pm ==Rauner has supported new revenues for the past 22 months.==

    Really? What specific proposals does he have in mind? He has plenty of specifics about his TA (although which ones matter changes by the minute) and some very good things such as prison and criminal law reform, but I’ve never seen any revenue raisers. Is there anything in Rep. Davis’ latest bill that he finds acceptable or opposes? Nothing in that bill is new, so he’s had plenty of time. Saying “give me what I want and then we’ll talk about the revenues you want” isn’t an honest bargaining position, much less support for new revenues.


  58. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 5:18 pm:

    –The obvious question is where are the revenue projections if his turnaround agenda is passed?–

    The obvious answer is that for Illinois media, “math is hard, Barbie.’

    It’s easier to just mindlessly write “budget impasse” and “reforms” ten thousand times, oblivious to the obvious that neither phrase communicates anything of substance.


  59. - Mary Jane - Wednesday, Nov 16, 16 @ 5:50 pm:

    Still don’t want to legalize and tax cannabis? Por que?


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Republicans denied TRO in bid to be appointed to ballot
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* It’s almost a law
* Credit Unions: A Smart Financial Choice for Illinois Consumers
* Was the CTU lobby day over-hyped?
* 'Re-renters' tax in the budget mix?
* It’s just a bill
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Get The Facts On The Illinois Prescription Drug Board
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller