Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x2 - Radogno responds - GOMB responds *** Harris wants budget working group reinstated
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x2 - Radogno responds - GOMB responds *** Harris wants budget working group reinstated

Tuesday, Dec 6, 2016 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Subscribers were tipped to this earlier today, as well as the reason why…,

State Rep. Greg Harris, D-Chicago, released the following statement Tuesday, after delivering letters to Gov. Bruce Rauner and Democratic and Republican legislative leaders urging a working group of lawmakers to immediately begin negotiations on a state budget:

“With only weeks before the stopgap budget expires, passing a responsible and comprehensive budget for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2017 and a full-year budget for Fiscal Year 2018 must be a priority. The governor and caucus leaders have been open to forming a bipartisan, bicameral budget working group. House Democrats are ready to do their part to end this gridlock and pass a budget that protects vital programs and services for families throughout Illinois. I am hopeful this group will begin meeting immediately and work throughout the coming weeks to achieve a budget solution.”

The letters are here.

*** UPDATE 1 ***  GOMB’s response…

The Governor’s Office of Management and Budget Chief of Staff Scott Harry released the following statement in the lead-up to today’s budget presentation from Speaker Madigan to the Governor and legislative leaders:

“The budget working group has gone as far as it can in putting together a balanced budget framework to accompany key reforms that grow the economy, lower property taxes, improve education and bring government pensions under control,” Harry said. “Now it’s time for the four leaders and the governor to reach agreement on these key reforms and give final parameters for a balanced budget framework.”

Yesterday, GOMB Director Tim Nuding met with budget directors from all four legislative caucuses to answer any remaining questions about the stopgap funding bill or issues needed for final decision-making on a FY17-FY18 balanced budget framework. The administration looks forward to seeing Speaker Madigan’s budget proposal in today’s Four Leaders meeting, including specific parameters for funding levels, cuts, revenue and/or reforms.

Notice there’s no mention of revenues in that budget framework. There were, but they don’t like to talk about that.

*** UPDATE 2 *** Senate Republican Leader Christine Radogno…

Dear Representative Harris:

Thank you for your most recent letter regarding budget working groups. I refer you to my letter sent to you last week that already addresses the topic. I am attaching a copy of that letter.

I look forward to seeing you at today’s meeting at 2pm to discuss the budget.

Her letter from last week is here. Basically, she said that she already did the working groups thing and now it’s up to the leaders.

       

35 Comments
  1. - anon - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 11:30 am:

    Never been more clear that Madigan’s intention is to stall and never reach a reasonable compromise.


  2. - Ducky LaMoore - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 11:34 am:

    ===Never been more clear that Madigan’s intention is to stall and never reach a reasonable compromise.===

    I’m sure he would love to get to the point of being able to compromise, but the governor won’t even discuss a budget. What is there to compromise on? What we can give the governor to actually do his job?


  3. - Team Sleep - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 11:38 am:

    I asked for this yesterday. Great minds think alike. :)


  4. - Dude - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 11:39 am:

    Please… somebody put forth a balanced budget to start negotiating from. Include whatever reforms, cuts, tax increases you think are appropriate. Negotiating can happen from there, but until someone at least proposes a balanced budget, we’ll get nowhere. It won’t happen because nobody has the balls to put their name to anything.


  5. - Robert the Bruce - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 11:49 am:

    Good. A bipartisan working group seems more likely to agree on a tax increase than either Rauner or Madigan proposing one.


  6. - Skeptic - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 11:52 am:

    Cue “…with reforms” in 3….2….1…..


  7. - Deft Wing - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 11:53 am:

    It took a supposed “budget expert” to come up with that lame “strategy?”

    It is absolutely and unmistakably clear that Madigan wants to stall. He doesn’t want a budget, he doesn’t want detente, and he doesn’t care that the State is in rapid decline.


  8. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 11:55 am:

    (Sigh)

    - Deft Wing -

    ===“I will insist that those be part of any stopgap plan, Rauner said. “Be ready, because that’s where we’re going.”===

    Rauner is holding the whole state hostage.

    Harris is trying to figure out the terms of releasing the hostages.

    What is the cost.

    Pay attention, please.


  9. - In 630 - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 11:57 am:

    == It won’t happen because nobody has the balls to put their name to anything. ==

    Which is extra aggravating because any group of legislators willing to do just what you described and put forward an alternative budget would look like heroes just for trying.


  10. - Henry Francis - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 11:59 am:

    No one wants to own the necessary cuts and the necessary tax increase. That is why “Gov slings and arrows” is asking for MJM to present a budget (despite the Constitution stating; no Governor, you do that first). If MJM presents an actual balanced budget, then the Gov gets to hang those cuts and taxes on MJM. And the Gov can continue his role of helpless victim my saying he only agreed to those things in order to save the hostages that MJM was holding.


  11. - hmmm - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 12:05 pm:

    So why did Madigan invite “budget expert” Greg Harris to these meetings, if all along Madigan wanted budget working groups? Another mistake by Madigan. He inadvertently proved that he just wants to grind the state into the ground.


  12. - Lucky Pierre - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 12:08 pm:

    I vote yes great idea with the precondition that if they fail to come to a bipartisan agreement, both sides submit their budget recommendation as is and the Senate and House vote on it no amendments


  13. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 12:12 pm:

    Now they need to flip the narrative.

    Make it clear that the state needs a budget, and the working groups will be charged with that goal.

    As such, extra-budgetary items will not be discussed.


  14. - Norseman - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 12:19 pm:

    Kiddie games continue.

    Show me your plan.

    Show me yours.

    No, you show me yours.

    I’m not showing you mine until you show me yours.

    Alas, our leaders continue to play rhetorical gotcha. Maybe we, should reach out for leadership from some older children who’ve learned to move beyond playground games.


  15. - Wow - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 12:24 pm:

    MJM should say today “the House Democrats are prepared to work with the Governor on passing his budget once HE gives us his revenue projections.


  16. - Christopher - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 12:25 pm:

    I don’t particularly feel like any one side is incredibly serious about negotiating a budget. If they can’t come to an agreement, what will really change?

    Rauner doesn’t seem to care if higher education or social services receive funding. At the same time, democrats don’t truly believe they will be blamed for a budget impasse.

    I always seem to come back to one point. In negotiations, both sides typically get something they want. In the governor’s mind, he gets his reforms and in turn the democrats get a tax increase. Does this make sense to anyone? Why would the democrats go for this?


  17. - Deft Wing - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 12:48 pm:

    A “budget expert” brought in to negotiate and get a deal done has to have more than the weak sauce Harris is stirring.

    Harris was used by the Speaker. #Shocker


  18. - Robert the Bruce - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 1:05 pm:

    Christopher, I don’t doubt that’s the way many republicans think (”Democrats want a tax increase!”)

    But to be fair, what the democrats would get out of the negotiations/hostage release is the funding of social services.


  19. - A guy - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 1:08 pm:

    To the Update(s): Not sure how long it’s going to take the Speaker to make his way completely to the corner, but he’s just about there.


  20. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 1:12 pm:

    ===Not sure how long it’s going to take the Speaker to make his way completely to the corner, but he’s just about there.===

    Nah, - A Guy -

    ===“I will insist that those be part of any stopgap plan, Rauner said. “Be ready, because that’s where we’re going.”===

    When the hostage-taker is at the “Give in or the state gets it”, it’s not the Speaker in the Corner, it’s Rauner telling us the clock is almost at zeroes and hurting people is a-ok with Rauner.

    “Pat Quinn failed”

    “Bruce Rauner takes out hostages”

    Hmm.


  21. - LTSW - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 1:12 pm:

    There are only about 10 dems, if that many where funding social services is likely to get you any votes. And that group generally has no electoral opposition. The Republican view in my thinking is that the Dems made this mess they should take the heat. If they had extended the 5% income tax Rainer would have very little to bargain over.


  22. - Arsenal - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 1:16 pm:

    Yeah, when Rauner has bargained himself down to two agenda items and a 36% approval rating, he seems like the one on the run. And I don’t think accepting the consequences of no further stopgap budgets will be quite the show of strength he hopes.


  23. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 1:20 pm:

    Candidate Bruce Rauner, and Governor-Elect Bruce Rauner told everyone that he could balance the budget with a 3.75% tax rate. He asked the legislature to not extend the 5% rate. They should ask him for his budget proposal now showing how he will accomplish this feat.


  24. - Skeptic - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 1:31 pm:

    ” a balanced budget framework to accompany key reforms” Boom! There it is!


  25. - Ebenezer - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 1:38 pm:

    No one is willing to put their name behind a balanced budget. Both sides would rather place kick the can than face the realities.
    Both sides can persuade their tribe that the other guy is the real problem. There won’t be 60 votes until the wheels come completely off the bus.

    Its got to get a lot worse.

    I’ll second Honeybear’s comment from another post about failed states.


  26. - A guy - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 1:51 pm:

    ==Nah, - A Guy -=

    Willy, if anyone agreed with you besides you, I might give that more thought.

    At some point, maybe Crains will say it. Then, you can take it to the bank. Oy.

    The Speaker is wobbly. Never seen it before. The last few months is what it looks like. Time catches up to everyone and it’s on his heels. Keep watching. He’s not on offense.


  27. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 2:22 pm:

    ===.. if anyone agreed with you, I might give that more thought.===

    That’s not an argument, make the argument.

    I did.

    ===Time catches up to everyone and it’s on his heels. Keep watching. He’s not on offense.===

    … Yet Rauner is prepared to take out hostages?

    Your rationale makes no sense here.


  28. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 2:37 pm:

    The chicken game continues.

    If anyone wants to look more responsible, noble or statesmanlike than the other, then they can actually put a proposed budget out there. Not a lot of competition out there.

    The Constitution explicitly requires the governor to do it, but it’s clear by now that ain’t going to happen with the current governor. He’d prefer that Madigan take the lead on the tough stuff, to hear him talk.

    Umtil somebody steps up, they’re all on the same level of juvenile dreariness.


  29. - Politix - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 2:59 pm:

    MJM has been much more demonstrative this year with his intentions. Accept the stalling or don’t, Mike’s done. Rauner’s not getting a thing.

    And here’s to another year of gridlock!


  30. - Politix - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 3:11 pm:

    I’d agree he was wobbly the first two years. The election season seems to have helped him gain his sea legs. He now gives zero … anything.


  31. - Arsenal - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 3:16 pm:

    ==The Speaker is wobbly.==

    You’ve been saying this Since January, 2015, but it’s been Rauner who’s bargained away all but two of his demands.

    As far as that goes, it’s actually exactly what a lot of smart Republicans on this forum predicted.


  32. - Arsenal - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 3:30 pm:

    That being said, I agree the Speaker has lost some speed on his fastball, but it’s more in his electoral operation than his negotiating tactics.


  33. - A guy - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 3:47 pm:

    ==ut it’s more in his electoral operation===

    Don’t kid yourself. He’s lost some speed on that fastball too. Just as he is, his operatives are getting long in the tooth. Their techniques aren’t as effective in the newer territories his map making skills earned him.

    He’s wobbly. Never seen him like this. I’m not ready to say “he’s just holding on”, but I wouldn’t immediately disagree with that thought. It’s been an epic run, but we’re in the twi-light.


  34. - vibes - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 4:24 pm:

    We may have to wait this out until February 15th, when the Governor is (next) obligated under law to submit a balanced budget.

    }}
    Sec. 50-5. Governor to submit State budget.
    (a) The Governor shall …not later than … the third Wednesday in February of each year thereafter


  35. - MAMA - Tuesday, Dec 6, 16 @ 6:11 pm:

    Senate Republican Leader Christine Radogno is there any good reason why you or the governor can not produce a budget to be voted on?


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Isabel’s afternoon briefing
* Things that make you go 'Hmm'
* Did Dan Proft’s independent expenditure PAC illegally coordinate with Bailey's campaign? The case will go before the Illinois Elections Board next week
* PJM's massive fail
* $117.7B In Economic Activity: Illinois Hospitals Are Essential To Communities And Families
* It’s just a bill
* Showcasing The Retailers Who Make Illinois Work
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Pritzker calls some of Bears proposals 'probably non-starters,' refuses to divert state dollars intended for other purposes (Updated)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller