* From the Illinois Republican Party…
“House Democrats will finally be forced to publicly declare whether they will continue to support Mike Madigan’s three-decade reign of failure or side with the overwhelming number of Illinoisans who know it’s time for Boss Madigan to go.” – Illinois Republican Party Spokesman Steven Yaffe
The Illinois Republican Party will continue to highlight Boss Madigan’s disastrous record tomorrow as House Democrats decide whether allegiance to their political patron is more important than listening to the people of Illinois.
If you’re at the University of Illinois Springfield, where the General Assembly inauguration will take place tomorrow, be sure to look out for the ILGOP.
The GOP will be launching a brand-new snapchat filter, as well as distributing “Fire Boss Madigan” campaign buttons and flyers to continue to spread awareness about Boss Madigan’s decades of disaster.
The snapchat filter is here and the flier is here. From the flier…
Madigan controls all legislation considered by the Illinois House and controls the campaign money spent by his state party. Madigan is the undisputed boss of the Chicago political machine.
And that makes the governor… ?
* As we’ve already discussed, the Illinois Policy Institute is also planning a demonstration for tomorrow. The group now has an agenda…
Protest: 11 a.m. - 12 p.m.
Voters will peacefully assemble displaying signs that encourages 100th General Assembly Members to not vote for Michael Madigan as Speaker of the House.
28 Comments
|
* From WMAY…
A judge has ordered Governor Bruce Rauner to cooperate with an investigation into whether he and top staffers conducted state business on private emails.
WMAY’s watchdog partner, the Better Government Association, has been pushing to see emails between Rauner and top communications staffers on how to deal with media inquiries.
Actually, no. The BGA originally FOIA’d all e-mails sent to or by Gov. Rauner and communications guys Lance Trover and Mike Schrimpf from January 12-19, 2015. That includes, by definition, e-mails that reporters sent to Trover and Schrimpf along with the replies.
The governor’s office found over 3,500 e-mails and asked the BGA to narrow the scope of its request. The BGA narrowed it to January 13, 2015 - the day after Rauner was inaugurated.
* So, what the heck is going on here? From the BGA…
A Cook County judge Monday opened the door to examining whether Gov. Bruce Rauner and top officials in his administration used personal email to conduct public business.
Acting on a lawsuit filed by the Better Government Association, Circuit Court Judge Kathleen M. Pantle ordered the governor’s office to cooperate with the watchdog group in determining whether emails discussing government business could be found on personal email accounts of Rauner and two top aides.
The BGA lawsuit, filed in July 2015, seeks business related emails sent on selected days during Rauner’s first month in office to or from the governor, his then Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications Mike Schrimpf and Communications Director Lance Trover. […]
In her ruling, Pantle said she will personally review the disputed emails to determine whether they should become public.
What’s more, her order requires the governor’s office and the BGA to “engage in discovery” on whether emails on personal accounts of the three involved discussions of public business. That decision came in response to an argument from the BGA questioning the thoroughness of a search for emails that did not include personal accounts used to transact public business.
So, apparently they’re trying to figure out whether Rauner and some people in the governor’s office are sending government-related e-mails on private e-mail accounts.
I gotta admit it will be interesting to see what they dig up on Rauner because he supposedly doesn’t do e-mail any longer and has no state e-mail account.
But the target date of that FOIA is, as mentioned above, the day after the swearing in. I imagine people still didn’t have fully functioning offices yet. Whatever they find might not mean much.
I checked my in-box and I can’t find a single government-related e-mail from Trover or Schrimpf that was sent from their personal G-Mail accounts. All the government-related e-mails I’ve received have been from their state accounts.
* In the meantime, does this mean that the BGA wants to gain access to off the record exchanges between the governor’s office and reporters? The governor’s people say that’s one reason why they’re resisting the FOIA. I asked Andy Shaw, and he sent me to his group’s attorney Matt Topic, who e-mailed me a few hours later…
We aren’t aware of that being an issue in our suit one way or the other, but I’m not aware of any legal basis under FOIA to withhold off-the-record statements in emails by government officials simply on that basis, regardless of what account was used.
So, in other words, if I ask a question off the record and/or receive an off the record response, that’s FOIA-able.
I don’t think I love that idea.
…Adding… I think some may be unclear on this. If I send an off the record question or whatever to someone’s private e-mail account, is that really fair game for FOIA? I haven’t done so with Trover, but seriously? You should be able to access that correspondence, too?
…Adding More… I really think off the record reporter conversations are (or should be) exempted from FOIA. From the exemption list..
Business trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential and disclosure would cause a competitive harm to the person or business.
So, I truly don’t see how anyone can think that confidential, off the record conversations which could put commercial media outlets at a competitive disadvantage are FOIA-able.
47 Comments
|
Rep. Cassidy explains her Madigan vote
Tuesday, Jan 10, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a constituent e-mail sent today by Rep. Kelly Cassidy (D-Chicago)…
With the start of a new term also comes a new election for leadership in both chambers. Speaker Madigan has been in that role for 30 years (with the exception of 2 years when democrats lost the majority) and is the second longest serving leader of any state legislative body in the history of the United States.
I have heard from several constituents urging me to vote against Speaker Madigan. I can fully appreciate the frustration expressed towards him, and I have been vocal in my belief that we need to be doing things differently than we have over the last two years. At the same time, laying all the blame for this standoff on Speaker Madigan isn’t accurate either. I have been critical of both Speaker Madigan and Governor Rauner when they deserve it and will continue to do so.
Ultimately, the election of Speaker of the House is a choice between candidates. As of right now, there are two candidates who have declared their intention to run for Speaker on Wednesday - Michael Madigan and Jim Durkin, the current House Minority Leader. My responsibility is to cast my vote for the person whose values most closely align with mine. Madigan, while flawed, supports the rights of workers, equality for women and the LGBT community, and he is pushing back against policies that hurt middle class families and those living in poverty.
I have a good working relationship with Leader Durkin, but to put him in charge of the House would effectively put Governor Rauner in the driver’s seat. I cannot in good conscience cast a vote that would ultimately harm the people I represent even more than they have been already.
Ending this stalemate is important. But ending it by allowing Governor Rauner to ram through policies aimed at ending collective bargaining, enriching private contractors, decimating child care and care for the elderly and disabled, among a long list of things our caucus has pushed back against in an effort to find a budget solution not held hostage by non-budgetary issues, is not the right answer.
Assuming Speaker Madigan is reelected this week, I intend instead to continue to forcefully push him towards more thoughtful solutions and alternative policies that will actually help the people we serve, along with a more open process to allow more ideas to come to the floor.
42 Comments
|
Rauner joins push for DeVos
Tuesday, Jan 10, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Gov. Rauner signed this letter along with several other governors that calls Donald Trump’s Education Secretary nominee an “inspired choice”…
* The IFT is not amused…
* Gov. Rauner probably doesn’t care…
Gov. Bruce Rauner offered a “modest proposal” in 2011 to administer the ACT exam to Chicago Public Schools teachers and publish the results by printing average scores, according to a correspondence included in Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s trove of recently-released emails.
“Administer the ACT this september, and every other sept thereafter, to all teachers in cps - publish results by printing the avg teacher ACT score for each school,” Rauner wrote before he was elected governor. “Galvanize media and parent conversations about teacher quality/recruiting/training and would lay the groundwork for many of the changes we need to make going forward.” […]
“Every principal in the system will immediately begin to think about the talent of their teachers and explore ways to recruit more intelligent, academically accomplished teachers so that their school does not stay at bottom of rankings on teacher test scores - no edicts or directives needed from central office - we can leave it to the media and parents to discuss whether there is or should be a correlation between teachers’ scores and student achievement,” he said.
This got me to thinking when the governor’s actual education policy reform agenda may emerge. He’s talked a lot about funding, but hasn’t really tackled substantive issues as of yet. The DeVos appointment might force the matter here, though.
* Aside from the education reform stuff, the NY Times has this bit of insight…
After Tom Casperson, a Republican state senator from Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, began running for Congress in 2016, he assumed the family of Betsy DeVos, President-elect Donald J. Trump’s nominee to be education secretary, would not oppose him.
The DeVoses, a dominant force in Michigan politics for decades with a fortune in the billions, had contributed to one of Mr. Casperson’s earlier campaigns. But a week before his primary, family members sent $24,000 to one of his opponents, then poured $125,000 into a “super PAC,” Concerned Taxpayers of America, that ran ads attacking him.
The reason, an intermediary told Mr. Casperson: his support from organized labor.
* Related…
* Senate Postpones Confirmation Hearing for Education Secretary Nominee Betsy DeVos
* 5 Questions for Betsy DeVos
58 Comments
|
EDGE heads to governor
Tuesday, Jan 10, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* AP…
The Illinois House has approved a four-month extension of a corporate tax incentive program amid an ongoing budget standoff.
The Economic Development for a Growing Economy, or EDGE, program was set to expire at the end of last year. It offers businesses tax breaks in exchange for agreements on creating and maintaining jobs.
The House approved an extension 101-12 Tuesday. If approved, it will sunset in April. The measure now heads to the state Senate.
Some lawmakers argue the program needs an overhaul because it benefits larger companies over smaller ones. Bill sponsor Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie says short-term extension is the way to go.
It’s not often explained, but the credit for capital investment and job creation is applied to the state income tax withheld by a company from the new workers added under the program. Companies often don’t pay much state corporate income tax, so this is a way to give them money that would’ve otherwise gone to state coffers.
The Senate also approved the bill today on a 48-7 roll call. The governor has yet to say what he plans to do.
* Crain’s…
Authority to offer such incentives had automatically sunsetted Jan. 1, caught amid the continuous battles in the capital over terms for adopting a fiscal 2018 state budget and fully funding all programs in this year.
Both Democrats and Republicans say they want changes in the Edge program, the state’s largest and by many accounts most effective tool in getting companies to move and expand here. For instance, Sen. Pam Althoff, R-Crystal Lake, and Melissa Bush, D-Grayslake, are sponsoring legislation cut the size of Edge incentives and limit them to net versus retained positions.
Bush referenced that in floor debate today, saying the temporary extension “says to business, ‘We’re open for business,”‘ but that she will continue to work “to get a good (permanent) bill later.”
Of course, putting off the day of decision until April 30 puts one more item on the table for House Speaker Mike Madigan and Rauner to fight about this spring.
8 Comments
|
Question of the day
Tuesday, Jan 10, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The two Senate leaders held a rare joint press conference yesterday…
* The Question: Your caption?
81 Comments
|
* From the BGA…
In the months leading up to Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s 2015 re-election, members of the family that controls Illinois’ most successful casino gave $300,000 to his campaign. Just five days into Emanuel’s second term, Rivers Casino chairman Neil Bluhm called in a request.
Among emails obtained recently from Emanuel’s personal account by the Better Government Association is one sent to the mayor written by his deputy Steve Koch on May 23, 2015, relating a phone conversation with Bluhm.
“Spoke to Neil Bluhm,” Koch wrote. “he (sic) was calling to make sure we are as opposed to table games at racetracks as he is. I assured he (sic) we are adamantly opposed.” […]
That communication took place one day after a report in The Daily Herald about a push in Springfield to expand casino style gambling to racetracks like Arlington Park. Such a move, had it succeeded, would have posed a competitive threat to nearby Rivers in Des Plaines. […]
Bluhm’s call to the deputy mayor prompted this email response from then chief City Hall lobbyist Michael Rendina: “We will need to call [state senate president John] Cullerton and ask that he keep them (table games at tracks) out of the bill.”
Emanuel spokesman Matt McGrath dismissed the importance of the Bluhm interaction, noting that city and Rivers had a common cause in opposing the threat of turning racetracks into casinos.
“We had the same position on table gaming because he was worried they would eat into the profits of his casino and we were worried they would eat into the profits of a possible Chicago casino,” said McGrath. “We didn’t need a reminder from Mr. Bluhm that this was something to be opposed.”
Spokesman Dennis Culloton said that Bluhm, a registered lobbyist for Rivers, alerted the city that the racetrack measure was afoot “to make sure the city reviewed the negative impact that table games at the tracks would have on gaming revenues to the city. As two major stakeholders in this potential legislation, this conversation was entirely appropriate and in the interest of the city.”
Your thoughts?
17 Comments
|
“BVR is a boss too”
Tuesday, Jan 10, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The Chicago Tribune continues to identify Diana Sroka Rickert as “a writer with the Illinois Policy Institute,” when she is actually “Vice President of Communications at the Illinois Policy Institute.” She’s not just a writer, she’s in charge of the group’s spin.
Anyway, here’s her latest for the Trib…
“What would Illinois be like if we had different political leadership?”
It’s midafternoon on a weekday, and Illinois Rep. Christian Mitchell is on the other end of the phone. He laughs.
“Oh, you must be calling people who have already started drinking for the day,” says Mitchell, a Chicago Democrat.
And so began my quest to find out what Illinois could look like if it had new blood. By that, I mean: What if House Speaker Michael Madigan became former House Speaker Michael Madigan?
I teased Rep. Mitchell about that comment this morning. He chuckled and said she didn’t use any of his quotes about the current impasse and the governor.
* So, I asked Mitchell what he said and he sent me this summation…
You could remove Madigan from office, and Democrats would still oppose, almost lockstep, Rauner’s agenda. I didn’t like voting for pension reform, but I voted for it because I could score it. I could look at my constituents and say, you keep 87 cents on the dollar of what you earned - it’s not right that you’re being hit at all, but here’s where we are - and we have more dollars to spend on infrastructure, education and social services, while making sure you still have a pension.
I can’t do that with the turnaround agenda. We can move reasonably on workers comp reform, but we have to address insurance profits and exploitation of workers and businesses. A property tax freeze is a horrible idea that will cripple municipal governments and bankrupt our schools.
There isn’t a single independent analysis that demonstrates that the turnaround agenda will do anything to turnaround Illinois. On the other hand, I know that progressive tax reform that asks the Bruce Rauner’s of the world to pay their fair share for services means we can invest in the infrastructure that allows businesses to get their goods to and from market, and can put rural Illinoisans back to work. I know that reforms like fair scheduling and paid sick leave mean more workers will have more money in their pockets to spend and drive the economy. There’s data to show it.
Obviously she used none of that. But that’s what I said. MJM as the problem is simplistic. BVR is a boss too, and his agenda is anathema to Democrats.
So feel free to use that 😊
35 Comments
|
Another win for criminal justice reform
Tuesday, Jan 10, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* AP…
The Illinois House has approved a package of criminal-justice reforms to aid crime victims and reduce prison populations.
The plan won House approval 83-26 on Monday and moves to the Senate. It includes additional counseling and other services for crime victims paid with federal funds. It would allow prisoners to complete improvement programs to shorten their sentences. Judges would have more leeway to order probation in drug cases.
Peoria Democratic Rep. Jehan Gordon-Booth says her measure would reduce Illinois’ prison population - a goal of Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner. And Gordon-Booth says it would help ex-inmates rejoin the community and heal families affected by violence.
Some lawmakers questioned whether there would be money in a state budget crisis for new initiatives.
Yeah, well, then how about passing a budget?
* From the bill’s synopsis…
Provides that the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority shall conduct strategic planning and provide technical assistance to implement comprehensive trauma recovery services for violent crime victims in underserved communities with high-levels of violent crime, with the goal of providing a safe, community-based, culturally competent environment in which to access services necessary to facilitate recovery from the effects of chronic and repeat exposure to trauma. Provides that services may include, but are not limited to, behavioral health treatment, financial recovery, family support and relocation assistance, and support in navigating the legal system.
Amends the Unified Code of Corrections. Changes sentence credit for good conduct in specific instances to earned sentence credit for good conduct in specific instances as the Director of Corrections deems proper. Deletes provisions that an offender may not receive probation, periodic imprisonment, or conditional discharge for certain drug offenses, or for Class 2 felony offenses that are not sex offenses or firearm offenses if the offender has received a sentence for a Class 2 felony and has previously been convicted of a Class 2 or greater felony. Provides that a period of probation, a term of periodic imprisonment or conditional discharge shall not be imposed for a Class 2 or greater felony sex offense or felony firearm offense if the offender had been convicted of a Class 2 or greater felony, including any state or federal conviction for an offense that contained, at the time it was committed, the same elements as an offense now (the date of the offense committed after the prior Class 2 or greater felony) classified as a Class 2 or greater felony, within 10 years of the date on which the offender committed the offense for which he or she is being sentenced, except as otherwise provided in the Alcoholism and Other Drug Abuse and Dependency Act.
13 Comments
|
“Grand bargain” roundup
Tuesday, Jan 10, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* O’Connor…
The Illinois Senate is poised to go it alone in outlining a solution to the nation’s longest-running state budget standoff but leaders acknowledge they won’t have time to push it through to the governor in the final two days of the current session.
A bipartisan Senate deal began to emerge late last week with a goal of breaking the nearly two-year deadlock between Democrats who control the Legislature and Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner. It was positioned for a floor vote by late Monday, but since the session ends Tuesday, there’s no time to push the plan to the House. It would have to be reintroduced after a new General Assembly is seated Wednesday.
The package includes an increase in the personal income tax from 3.75 percent to 4.95 percent, borrowing money to pay off $11 billion in overdue bills, expanding legalized riverboat casino gambling, raising the minimum wage and eliminating pensions for retired lawmakers.
The Senate has been largely sidelined during the seeming test of wills between former venture capitalist Rauner and Michael Madigan, the Chicago Democrat who has run the House for most of three decades. But the Senate plan hasn’t involved the House, and is the result of weeks of talks between Democratic Senate President John Cullerton and Republican Leader Christine Radogno.
* Sfondeles…
Madigan spokesman Steve Brown said the package appears to “not yet be complete.”
“Until you have a complete package, it’s hard to even analyze, no less decide what works,” Brown said.
Brown also questioned the package as a whole: “That means you could take some precarious votes and if other things don’t pass for whatever reason, then you’re out there walking the plank.”
Brown instead encouraged the Senate to take up a House measure to fund higher education and social services, which was approved Monday 63-49.
Not exactly a substantive objection.
And since the House apparently doesn’t have the votes to override a Rauner veto of its stopgap budget, why would the Senate go along?
* Finke…
Senate Republican Leader Christine Radogno, who negotiated the bills with Cullerton, said Monday she hopes the legislation can pass the Senate before Feb. 1.
“I think we in the Senate recognize the problems and we are potentially close to an agreement on how to solve them. But we are not quite there,” Cullerton, a Chicago Democrat, said at a Statehouse news conference.
“One of the big takeaways from this is for the first time we’re acknowledging that we really do need to link the reforms, the revenue and the budget all together,” said Radogno, of Lemont. […]
“There was some resistance to the lame-duck aspect of this,” Radogno said. “We are often criticized for doing things too quickly.”
She said some senators only learned details of the package Monday. She said the concerns were “primarily” about the timing rather than the substance of the bills.
There were some substantive problems as well.
* Garcia and Geiger…
“None of this could ever become law, so today is somewhat irrelevant. But I think, in essence, we’ve made our point,” said Sen. Jason Barickman, R-Bloomington. “I think it puts the onus on both Speaker Madigan and Gov. Rauner.” […]
“At some point the campaign has to end. There is no ability to govern if you never stop campaigning,” said Sen. Toi Hutchinson, D-Olympia Fields. “At this point, doing anything less is unconscionable. We cannot go another two years like this.” […]
Cullerton, meanwhile, was left to explain why Democrats would go along with the compromise after spending years objecting to Rauner’s attempts to tie the budget to his legislative agenda.
“We’re two years into this, we don’t have a budget,” Cullerton said. “It’s an embarrassment for the state.”
Ain’t that the truth.
* Mackey…
That said, there’s plenty of skepticism among rank-and-file legislators like Dale Righter, a Republican senator from Mattoon.
“If legislators come to the … taxpayers and say, ‘You know what, we just need a big tax increase, and we’ll tweak the curtains here and a little bit over here, but nothing substantive changes,’ I think that there’s going to be a rude awakening,” Righter says.
You get what you can get, and I think Radogno did a pretty decent job here. There will be some changes, for sure, but my hat’s off to the Leader.
* Vinicky…
Rauner took umbrage with the notion that he (and Madigan) have been “cut out” of talks.
He laughed at the question, then said “Well, I don’t know if I’d say ‘cut out’ if the right word. […]
“I don’t need to be in the middle of everything,” he said.
Maybe this is his “Eureka!” moment. But don’t hold your breath. He has to be in the middle of everything. It’s his nature.
* Petrella…
The package that was introduced Monday in the Senate would increase the state’s personal income tax rate from 3.75 percent to 4.95 percent and the corporate rate from 5.25 percent to 7 percent. Another component would provide an additional $740 million in funding for social services and $1.1 billion for higher education for the remainder of the state’s current fiscal year.
The Senate also is considering legislation that would authorize borrowing $7 billion to help pay down the state’s backlog of unpaid bills, which currently stands at $11 billion.
Also included are pension reforms that Cullerton has advocated, an increase in the state’s minimum wage from $8.25 an hour to $11 an hour by 2021, and changes that would make it easier to consolidate units of local government.
A gambling expansion measure would create licenses for six new casinos, including one for the proposed Walker’s Bluff resort and casino in southern Illinois’ Williamson County and another for the south suburbs of Chicago.
The final package also could include changes to the state’s workers’ compensation laws, a referendum on amending the Illinois Constitution to limit lawmakers to 10 years in top legislative leadership positions, and an overhaul of the way the state funds public schools.
59 Comments
|
Today’s quotable
Tuesday, Jan 10, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Tribune…
Most politicians would see a $50 million deposit into a campaign fund as a threat, but Gov. Bruce Rauner has a different interpretation of his contribution to his re-election bid, saying it’s about encouraging “bipartisan compromise.”
“I am focused on fundamentally changing the trajectory of our state. The system is broken, we’ve been going down a bad road for a long time. What I am advocating is bipartisan compromise to get solutions,” Rauner said Monday.
Interrupted and asked how $50 million encourages bipartisan compromise, Rauner said: “We need to be a two-party state. Politics, democracy doesn’t work on a one-party basis. We were a one-party state for a long time, it almost bankrupted us.
“Two thirds of the elections for the General Assembly, there was no opponent. That doesn’t work,” he said at a breakfast event Monday morning. “Voters, whether you are a Democrat or a Republican, you deserve competition for your vote, you deserve alternative and competing ideas and recommendations so then you have a choice. People in Illinois don’t have choices, and I am an advocate for competition and alternatives.”
23 Comments
|
“Governor Gridlock” vs. “Madigan’s Mayor”
Tuesday, Jan 10, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Tribune…
The Illinois Senate on Monday easily approved Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s plan to shore up two city worker pension funds, but the measure faces an uncertain future now that it’s headed to a skeptical Gov. Bruce Rauner.
The mayor’s bill is aimed at preventing retirement systems for municipal workers and laborers from going broke in about a decade. The two funds are a combined $21 billion short of what’s needed to pay out future benefits, and the plan relies on newly hired employees paying more toward their retirement.
The House approved the bill 91-16 last month, and on Monday the Senate followed suit, 41-0. But the Rauner administration, which is seeking a broader deal to cut costs in state worker pension systems, responded Monday by throwing some cold water on the plan.
“The governor cannot support this bill without real pension reform that protects taxpayers,” Rauner spokeswoman Catherine Kelly said in a statement.
* And then things got heated. Sun-Times…
“Bruce Rauner is Governor Gridlock, and he is showing why nothing gets done in Springfield,” [Emanuel’s communications director Adam Collins] wrote.
“The bill to affirm our plan to save the last two city pensions enjoyed overwhelming bipartisan support in both houses. It passed 41-0 in the Senate and 91-16 in the House, both veto proof majorities. Instead of spending his time figuring out how to stop us from fixing our pensions, the governor should focus on passing a budget and fixing his own.” […]
“The Chicago machine created the pension mess and now wants the state to green light another hike on Chicago taxpayers,” said Lance Trover, Rauner’s deputy chief of staff for communications. “That might work for Mike Madigan and Rahm Emanuel but it’s unfair to Chicago homeowners. Madigan’s Mayor has already cost Chicago taxpayers too much.”
If Rauner waits to veto the measure until the lame duck session is over, the bill will die. New members sworn in Tuesday wouldn’t have the authority to overturn it.
Sheesh.
20 Comments
|
Today’s number: 13 percent
Tuesday, Jan 10, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The Guardian drills down…
The map of America’s gun violence epidemic can seem overwhelming. There were more than 13,000 gun homicides in the US in 2015, across nearly 3,500 cities and towns. But the toll of this gun violence was not distributed equally.
Half of America’s gun homicides in 2015 were clustered in just 127 cities and towns, according to a new geographic analysis by the Guardian, even though they contain less than a quarter of the nation’s population. […]
Though these neighborhood areas contain just 1.5% of the country’s population, they saw 26% of America’s total gun homicides… People who live in these neighborhood areas face an average gun homicide rate about 400 times higher than the rate across those high-income countries. […]
In 2015, Chicago had the highest total number of gun homicides of any city in America. But the city’s gun homicide rate per person was much lower than St Louis.
Just 13% of census tracts in Chicago saw multiple gun murders in 2015, and these tracts were responsible for 65% of the city’s gun homicides.
The publication also looked at how those homicide clusters lined up with people living below the poverty line, people with high school diplomas and people living in highly segregated communities and found a pretty consistent match. Go check out the whole thing.
12 Comments
|
Rauner admin calls AFSCME offer “superficial”
Tuesday, Jan 10, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* As we discussed yesterday, AFSCME has offered to “jumpstart” its stalled contract talks by agreeing to a four-year base wage freeze and increased health insurance costs. Here is the Rauner administration reply…
Hi, Rich –
Wanted to make sure you had this on AFSCME letter…
The bi-partisan Labor Relations Board ruled unanimously that AFSCME and the state are at impasse. AFSCME’s latest framework does not bridge the more than $3 billion gap between the parties. Instead of this superficial letter, we invite AFSCME to drop its litigation blocking the administration’s last, best, and final offer and work with us on implementing common sense proposals like earning overtime for working over 40 hours in a week, using volunteers, and creating workplace safety programs.
Best,
ck
I still don’t get where they come up with that $3 billion gap between the two sides.
But, anyway, if you were hoping for some movement, you are out of luck unless the union goes a lot further.
44 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
AFSCME tries to “jumpstart” contract talks
Monday, Jan 9, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Press release…
One year and one day since Governor Bruce Rauner’s administration broke off contract negotiations with the largest union of public service workers in state government, AFSCME is taking the initiative to jumpstart constructive dialogue. The union has sent the governor a letter outlining a new settlement framework which significantly modifies AFSCME’s previous positions on core economic issues.
The elements of the AFSCME framework include the following:
✓ Employees would forgo any increases in base wages in all four years of the contract.
✓ Employees would pay increased health insurance premiums, co-pays and deductibles in FY 17, 18 and 19 as determined by an independent arbitrator in the recent interest arbitration regarding contract terms for Illinois state troopers.
✓ All employees would receive the amounts the governor has already proposed to expend on bonuses—$1,000 per employee in the first year of the contract and 2% of payroll in each subsequent year—as one-time payments in each of those years.
✓ In order to prevent large pay differentials among employees performing the same work, the 40% of employees eligible for continued movement through the pay plan would move to the next step in FY 18 and 19.
✓ Further negotiations on all other outstanding issues.
“Our union remains ready to return to bargaining,” AFSCME Council 31 Executive Director Roberta Lynch said. “We know that Illinois residents rely on public service workers in state government to protect children from abuse, aid our veterans, respond to emergencies, keep our air and water clean, and much more. We want to keep Illinois working, without the potential disruption of a statewide strike.”
The Rauner Administration broke off negotiations on Jan. 8, 2016, and has refused to meet with the union bargaining team in the intervening year. Instead the governor asked the Illinois Labor Relations Board, whose members he appoints, to declare an “impasse” in negotiations, thus opening the door for Rauner to impose his own terms on state workers. Rauner’s demands include:
• No salary increases for four years;
• A 100% hike in employee premiums for health care (forcing workers to pay double their current health costs) in the first year alone; and
• Withholding all scheduled movement through the pay plan for the newest-hired and often lowest-paid workers.
In all, Rauner’s demands equate to a $10,000 pay cut for the average state worker. By trying to impose those terms, the governor is threatening to force state employees out on strike for the first time in more than 40 years of collective bargaining.
“Our framework recognizes the state’s fiscal problems and shows that state employees will do their part to help address them,” Lynch said. “Employees would pay more for health insurance in three of the four years while receiving no increase to their base salary for four years, so the costs to the state are extremely modest.
“We think compromise, not conflict, is the way to move Illinois forward,” she said. “Let’s get back to the bargaining table and work toward an agreement that’s fair to all.”
The letter is here.
56 Comments
|
* The Illinois Manufacturers Association is not at all pleased with this “grand bargain” in the Senate.
For instance: “You could do anything you want to help us in workers comp, but it would pale in comparison to how bad this is,” was how one IMA member responded when told about the provision that eliminates the foreign and domestic dividend deduction. That’ll apparently cost businesses over $200 million on profits they don’t make in Illinois.
There are a lot of manufacturers involved with the sugar industry in this state, so a new sales tax on pop of $2.88 a case isn’t going down well with them, either. They point out that Cook County’s new sugary drink tax will result in taxes of almost $6 a case of pop in that county with this new state tax.
Then there’s the increase in the minimum wage and the permanent income tax hikes.
The proposal extends the research and development tax credit, “but doesn’t modernize it,” as the IMA leadership has wanted The proposal also doesn’t include manufacturers’ purchase credit and the graphic arts exemption, which have both expired.
The workers comp bill “doesn’t provide any savings,” the IMA claims. And despite the insistence of some, this is not Caterpillar’s proposed language, they say.
* “All they’re doing is trying to find money and not do anything on the business side to help us compete with our Midwestern neighbors,” said the IMA’s Greg Baise, adding saracastically, “This is a typical Illinois solution.”
“They’re putting a horrible marker down,” said Mark Denzler of the group.
50 Comments
|
* As I told subscribers early this morning, the Senate’s grand bargain was a whole lot grander than we thought last week. It included a minimum wage hike to $11 an hour over five years, a huge gambling expansion bill and a whole lot more…
Also, Amanda Vinicky has updated her Friday story with some more deets. Click here. I don’t believe a service tax is part of this, though.
* Meanwhile, in the House…
In the House on Monday, Rep. Greg Harris, D-Chicago, filed a proposal that would give social-services programs $258 million and higher-education programs $400 million. That money would include a full semester for MAP grants for all colleges, universities and community colleges, as well as funds for adult, vocational education and GED programs, according to Harris.
The money would come from two funds — the human-service fund and the educational-assistance fund. Both are fed from income taxes and would be available to spend within the first six months of the year.
“It’s a lifeline. As you remember, all the appropriations for social services and higher education ran out on the first of January, so you have schools trying to figure out how to stay open and you have MAP grant recipients trying to figure out if they can actually go to school — or if their school will be funded for the whole year,” Harris said. “Social service agencies are literally deciding whether to shut their doors, so this proposal would be a lifeline to them as the larger negotiations go on.”
The governor has repeatedly said he would oppose a stopgap budget unless he got term limits and a permanent property tax freeze, however.
…Adding…. More details on the House Dems’ proposal can be found by clicking here.
* Related…
* Illinois public employee union strategy to fight for pensions: Members should “do nothing” and let Madigan be our goalie.
50 Comments
|
* As the Tribune editorial board notes, more than half the states require special elections in cases like this…
Voters on Chicago’s South Side didn’t have a choice last year in the race for the 27th House district. Longtime Rep. Monique Davis, D-Chicago, briefly faced a challenge from Justin Slaughter, but he dropped out before the primary. Davis ran unopposed in the November election.
Then just before Christmas, she filed paperwork to retire from the seat she has held since 1987. But voters won’t pick her replacement. Local Democratic leaders did it for them. A handful of Chicago aldermen and suburban township committeemen met privately Thursday and selected Slaughter, a Chicago resident who works for the Cook County Board, to fill Davis’ seat. Surprise, 27th District voters! You have a new state rep.
It’s a maddening pattern repeated by lawmakers from both parties: They resign midterm or just before or after an election when it’s too late for someone else to compete for the seat. The timing triggers a process that allows local power brokers to choose the next lawmaker.
Roughly one-third of the 177 lawmakers serving in the House and Senate first got their seats in the General Assembly because they were appointed, not elected. An appointed lawmaker still has to run for the seat in the next election cycle, but he or she gets a head start, sometimes nearly a full term, in Springfield. They gain access to staff, campaign donors and special interest groups. Their political patrons prop them up by giving them popular, noncontroversial bills to sponsor. They have all the benefits of incumbency, including campaign lawyers, advice and money.
Slaughter is highly qualified and should do a decent job.
Look, I know that special elections cost money, but other states manage just fine.
* Meanwhile…
In Georgia, lawmakers are set to pass a more than $20 billion budget this year and grapple with a failing hospital system.
But Georgia, like many other states, faces a serious human resource problem in its Legislature: Salaries are often low and many would-be politicians can’t afford to be lawmakers.
Former Georgia state Rep. LaDawn Jones loved serving in the General Assembly even as she juggled raising two kids and running a law practice. But she left after one term because the job didn’t pay enough.
“I absolutely believe that we need to increase the wage for legislators to keep up with the times,” said Jones.
Lawmakers in Georgia make $17,342 a year, plus a per diem for lodging and meals when the Legislature is in session and reimbursement for mileage. Serving in the Georgia Legislature is considered a part-time job, but it took much more of Jones’ time than that and she had to hire extra help for her law firm. […]
That low level of pay also keeps many people from entering politics, said Malhotra. “There’s very, very few working class people in legislatures. This might have something to do with why a lot of legislation does not seem very friendly towards working class people.”
We have the opposite situation in Illinois, where legislators make a base pay of about $67K per year, plus other stipends for leadership or top committee slots.
* And speaking of that topic…
The state’s bill backlog has surpassed $11 billion and there’s no budget in place, but two suburban Republican lawmakers each will get extra $1,506 checks for two days of work this week.
House Republican Leader Jim Durkin tells me the move is the only way to get around Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan’s seniority rules.
Durkin late last week named Rep. Peter Breen, of Lombard, and Rep. Keith Wheeler, of Oswego, to leadership posts. But instead of making it effective when a new session begins Wednesday, Durkin named Breen and Wheeler to the posts for Monday and Tuesday, the final two days of the 99th General Assembly.
The $1,506 stipends are for one month of work in those roles. Members of the General Assembly make a base salary of $67,836. Breen and Wheeler’s stipends would be $18,066 apiece if they’re kept in leadership a full year.
Durkin, of Western Springs, says he appointed the two because he wants them to serve as committee spokesmen. House rules say those positions can be held only by lawmakers with three terms of seniority, which Breen and Wheeler lack, or with leadership appointments.
I was told around 9 o’clock this morning that the HGOPs would be checking with those two members to see if they’ll be accepting their stipends. I’ll let you know if I get an answer.
*** UPDATE *** I’m told neither Republican will accept the leadership stipends. Instead, they’re refund the stipends back to the state.
18 Comments
|
* From the ILGOP…
Extra! Extra! Boss Madigan Democrats Get Morning Delivery
Madigan’s Post-It Note Commands, Metra Scandal Top the Headlines
With three days left until Decision Day, Boss Madigan Democrats will receive envelopes from the Illinois Republican Party containing information they may wish to consider before supporting Madigan for a 17th term as Speaker.
The envelope will contain the Chicago Tribune’s scathing report and editorial about Boss Madigan’s use of post-it notes to inappropriately direct hiring decisions at Metra through “ward-style patronage”.
As a reminder, the Chicago Tribune reported that,
“A secret report put together by the legislature’s watchdog in the wake of last summer’s Metra scandal offers new insight into how Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan navigates the intersection of public business and ward-style patronage through his Southwest Side office and Illinois Capitol suite.
The analysis by then-Inspector General Thomas Homer — based on interviews with Madigan’s political allies, government officials and the speaker himself — presents those methods in an unflattering fashion.
The report contains an account of Metra’s chairwoman entering Madigan’s Capitol office to talk about state issues and leaving with a yellow Post-it note bearing names of two workers the speaker wanted to see promoted. In another meeting, a Metra lobbyist who was a longtime Madigan aide was spotted leaving the speaker’s office with two resumes. Another time, Madigan simply called the cellphone of one of his “better” precinct captains to tell him about a state job, according to the report.”
The envelope also contains a warning from Boss Madigan himself, in true post-it note patronage boss fashion.
Today’s delivery is part of the Illinois Republican Party’s countdown to Wednesday’s election for Speaker.
Now, Democrats have no excuse for being in the dark about Madigan’s ethical problems.
Will they still support him?
* Some sample packages…
But, remember, the governor has nothing whatsoever to do with influencing a chamber’s leadership election, except for the fact that he’s funding just about every dime of state party spending. But, still… no involvement whatsoever!
…Adding… As noted in comments, it’s a bit ironic that the party is talking about patronage hiring after Friday’s SJ-R story. Just sayin…
48 Comments
|
The power of the press?
Monday, Jan 9, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Friday afternoon, the Tribune published a story entitled “Bill to require school lead testing stalls in Springfield“…
Despite renewed national attention to the dangers of lead plumbing, most schools and day care centers still aren’t required to guarantee the safety of drinking water provided to children who are most vulnerable to the toxic metal. […]
Given the widespread use of lead in Illinois during the last century — Chicago required lead plumbing until it was banned nationwide in 1986 — Attorney General Lisa Madigan and public health advocates are pushing legislation that would require every Illinois school and day care center to regularly test water for a potent neurotoxin that can trigger learning disabilities and violent behavior. […]
But with only two days remaining in the current legislative session, the attorney general’s bill is on hold in a House committee, stalled after Gov. Bruce Rauner’s administration announced it opposed the measure and proposed rival legislation in late November.
The governor’s bill would allow schools to conduct detailed plumbing inventories instead of testing drinking fountains for lead. It also would order state health officials to develop their own standards for lead in drinking water — a task traditionally handled by federal authorities after years of study. […]
“If you don’t require testing, how are you supposed to know if there is a problem?” said Jennifer Walling, executive director of the Illinois Environmental Council, which helped draft the attorney general’s legislation. “The governor’s approach also could end up being more expensive for schools that already are concerned about costs.”
The article noted that the Rauner administration “appeared to soften their opposition to Madigan’s bill Friday.” Notably, this change apparently came after reporter Michael Hawthorne started checking around.
* From the governor’s press office this morning…
The following is an excerpt of a story from Politico Illinois:
Illinois public schools and licensed daycare facilities will be required to test drinking water for lead contamination under a major compromise reached by key stakeholders, parties involved in the deal told POLITICO Illinois.
Long-running negotiations among environmental groups, lawmakers, the Illinois Attorney General’s Office and the governor’s office culminated in a compromise late last week, according to Gov. Bruce Rauner’s office and the Illinois Environmental Council. […]
The agreed terms include a framework of the existing bill, pushed for months by Lisa Madigan’s office and others: schools built before the year 2000 that serve students fifth grade and younger, would be required to test for lead in all its drinking water sources, as well as sources of water used for cooking at the schools. Also, licensed day care centers would also be required to test water sources. A compromise effort ramped up by Rauner’s office since the veto session helped bring opponents on board, Walling said. […]
Walling said the amendment that is expected to be added to the bill on Monday is “the framework that the AG had been working on,” and includes technical tweaks pursued by Rauner’s office: “The agencies and the governor’s office did work (to bring compromise); they helped bring major stakeholders on board,” she said. […]
“Since its introduction, the administration met regularly with the proponents and the other stakeholders throughout the fall, as well as during the fall veto session and all of December to address some of the concerns raised with the original language,” (Gov. Rauner) spokeswoman Allie Bovis said.
However, a source close to the negotiations said today that “the only opponents the Rauner administration helped to bring on board was their own agencies.”
Three Rauner agencies had registered in opposition to the bill last year.
…Adding… The Rauner folks claim they told the Tribune on Friday that a “deal was done,” but the paper went ahead with the story anyway.
…Adding More… That same source close to the negotiations said that on Friday the Rauner administration was merely attempting to get itself to neutral.
4 Comments
|
Today’s quotable
Monday, Jan 9, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Tribune…
Minnesota U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison has reached out to Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan about his bid to become chairman of the Democratic National Committee and plans to do so soon with Mayor Rahm Emanuel.
But speaking to reporters prior to a Sunday rally of progressive Democrats on his behalf in Lincoln Park, Ellison also said he’s gotten no commitment from Madigan, the state’s Democratic chairman, though he said the House speaker is someone “who I admire tremendously.”
You don’t see that every day.
So, now I assume the SJ-R, the Belleville News-Democrat and the Chicago Tribune will firmly oppose Ellison’s candidacy?
7 Comments
|
* Yep…
As I’ve been saying all along, the idea isn’t to get a bill to the governor’s desk this week, it’s to come up with a bipartisan Senate counter-offer to the governor and to hopefully prod the House Speaker into meaningful talks with Gov. Rauner based on that outline.
As subscribers know, the question now is whether there will actually be a bipartisan Senate package today. We’ll see.
* The AP fills us in on what’s at stake here…
• $11 billion: The amount in bills at least 60 days old that the state owed, as of Friday, to vendors and service providers. That figure is higher than the current-year expected general revenue for 30 states, and more than the estimated tax dollars coming in this year for Alaska, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming combined, according to figures from the National Association of State Budget Officers.
• $5.3 billion: The estimated Illinois budget deficit on June 30 if nothing changes, according to the Governor’s Office of Management and Budget. That’s more than 13 percent of the total the state is on track to spend this fiscal year, and it’s the amount of revenue Arkansas estimates it will raise all year. Without action, the governor’s budget office predicts a $7 billion deficit in June 2018, or nearly 18 percent of the total spent.
• $1.7 million: The amount that was available for rape crisis centers to spend last fall after Rauner and legislative Democrats agreed to a six-month, stopgap budget that expired Dec. 31, according to Polly Poskin, executive director of the Illinois Coalition Against Sexual Assault. Other money appropriated paid the previous year’s bills. The remainder is about one-quarter of what the 29 centers statewide need to operate annually, so clients are waiting longer for counseling and layoffs have meant professionals must do administrative chores.
• $0: The amount available, once again, for the income-based Monetary Award Program that helps students attend college. The stopgap provided $321 million for 107,000 awards, but that left 162,000 eligible students without help. For the spring, the budget uncertainty once again puts colleges in the position of fronting students the money with the hope of state reimbursement or students finding alternatives, including sitting home instead of registering for class. An Illinois Student Assistance Commission survey in December found that more than half of MAP-eligible students responding to a survey reported the funding uncertainty had adversely impacted their school plans.
• 1 million: Number of people who had lost services from United Way social-service agencies, including mental health and substance-abuse treatment, domestic violence services and HIV prevention, as of last summer. The United Way of Illinois reported that 91 percent of its local organizations had cut services.
* Related…
* State cuts blamed for falling Springfield hotel occupancy rates
* Senate budget deal brewing ahead of lame duck session
* Lame-duck lawmakers return to Springfield with obstacles in way of budget deal
57 Comments
|
Take Frerichs off the 2018 governor’s list
Monday, Jan 9, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Tom Kacich…
State Treasurer Mike Frerichs, a Champaign Democrat, said last week that he’s “not looking at” running for governor in 2018. […]
And he shied from offering support for any of the other possible Democratic contenders, but took a shot at Rauner.
“I think part of our problem with our state is that everyone is looking at the next election and not looking at the office they were elected to,” he said. “At some point people have to stop campaigning and start governing. I had some hope after this last election the governor and Genera Assembly would sit down and focus on governing. But his reactions are to create web sites attacking other people and put $50 million into his campaign fund. It’s clear it’s going to be a two-year campaign, not two years of governing.
“I choose to focus on governing and managing my office rather than campaigning right now.”
16 Comments
|
You have some real leverage right now
Monday, Jan 9, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My Crain’s Chicago Business column…
If you’ve ever had problems with your phone or cable service, you’re in luck.
Well, maybe not in luck, but you do have the perfect opportunity to exact some revenge and maybe even force your service providers to do a much better job.
AT&T is ramping up to spend big bucks this year in Springfield to once again try to get out of the state requirement that it provide everyone with a copper wire phone line. I haven’t had one of those in years. But lots of people still do, particularly older folks.
In the past, groups like the Citizens Utility Board and AARP have blocked AT&T’s efforts in the General Assembly. David Kolata at Chicago-based CUB tells me his group has “serious concerns” about what dropping that requirement would mean “for less populated and low-income portions of the state in particular.”
Even so, as hard-wired phone lines continue to dwindle, the company may have a better shot this year. That’s where you come in.
What AT&T wants will be controversial. So it stands to reason that it will have to give up something in return. Last year, Exelon wanted a bailout for its nuclear power plants. In return, it had to agree to stop opposing programs benefiting alternative energy like wind and solar, among other things. Groups like the Sierra Club ended up as big winners.
CUB has a list of things it would like to happen. For instance, it wants to
Please click here to read the rest before commenting. Thanks.
7 Comments
|
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…
Back in December, Gov. Bruce Rauner was asked by a Chicago TV reporter if he planned to run for reelection. Rauner said he wasn’t focused on such things.
Just three days later, Gov. Rauner contributed $50 million to his own campaign fund.
So, either he suddenly focused himself on the 2018 campaign, or he simply wasn’t telling the truth.
Rauner does this a lot. Whenever he’s been asked about the Illinois Republican Party’s blistering post-election campaign attacks tying Democrats to House Speaker Michael Madigan, Rauner has said he doesn’t pay attention to that stuff - even though he has given his party almost all of its funding during the past year and even though he has often referred to himself as the leader of the state party and put his own people into positions at the party.
Look, all politicians play with the truth. But this is getting to be a bit too much to bear because these actions are at the very core of what Rauner is doing as governor.
You will recall that some of Rauner’s buddies set up a huge and ostensibly Democratic political action committee (IllinoisGO) right around the time Rauner was inaugurated in January of 2015. That campaign committee was, in reality, solely designed to mess with Madigan.
In June of 2015, the governor launched an expensive statewide TV advertising campaign attacking Speaker Madigan, blaming him for the failure to cave to the governor’s demands for pro-business/anti-union reforms in exchange for a state budget solution.
Shortly thereafter, the governor moved into the primary season, spending millions more. And then he started spending real money on state legislative races in June of 2016, an unheard-of early start date which actually came while lawmakers were still in session. Rauner even began paying for Chicago broadcast TV ads for Rep. Mike McAuliffe, R-Chicago, in early August, also an unheard-of start date. And the governor launched a TV ad touting his support for term limits, a not so subtle dig at the House Speaker’s record longevity.
Republican candidates picked up four House seats during last year’s campaign. But days after the election ended, the state GOP launched a new website, “BossMadigan.com.” The site is filled with profiles of Democrats whom the Republicans say are really just Speaker Madigan’s pawns. The party is also spending money on social media to spread the word about those naughty Democrats who’ve allegedly dared to align themselves with their own state party chairman.
This is still a free country and Gov. Rauner can do whatever he wants. The House Speaker is, after all, notorious for holding floor votes on ridiculously political bills. Madigan must’ve forced Republicans to vote against a phony “property tax freeze” bill 15 times in order to bash them with their own votes during the campaign. And this Madigan stuff goes back decades. We’ve always been in constant campaign mode in Illinois. Rauner is simply upping the ante with actual year-round campaign spending.
So for the governor to deny involvement or even knowledge of campaign activities when his entire organization and others around him have been deeply in campaign mode since Day One defies all credibility. This is not some ancillary activity.
To put it as simply as possible, Rauner has used campaign tactics to try and force a wedge between Democrats and Speaker Madigan. That’s what IllinoisGO was supposed to be about - an alternative source of campaign money for Democrats who defied Madigan, or a bludgeon against those who stuck with him. Everything Rauner has done since then has had the same two goals regarding Madigan.
And yet, when asked again about this topic just last week, Rauner said, “I’m not getting involved in any of the General Assembly’s decisions on their leadership.”
Right.
But this obsession with Madigan means Rauner has defined his own term in office as a crusade against the Great White Whale. Yes, there is plenty of public support for that. Madigan is the least popular politician in this state, and perhaps in the entire country.
“Moby Dick” didn’t end well for the pursuer, however. Madigan’s top people have been saying for more than 18 months that they know they can’t move their own guy’s poll numbers up very much, so their plan is to drag Rauner down to Madigan’s level. Rauner has eagerly followed Madigan into that rabbit hole and failed to accomplish much of anything else in the process.
At last check by a Republican pollster, the governor’s favorable rating was 36 percent, with an unfavorable rating of 48. He’s gonna need every bit of that $50 million, and a whole lot more.
* From Reboot…
In the era of Bruce Rauner, the Illinois campaign season has become an eternal cycle, with completion of one election serving as the starting line for the next.
We got hints of this when Gov.-elect Bruce Rauner, seven weeks after his victory over Pat Quinn in 2014, put $10 million of his own money into his campaign fund on New Year’s Eve. (Actually, the full deposit was $20 million, with Rauner’s contribution matched by another $10 million from billionaire Ken Griffin.)
* Tribune…
As for whether he thinks Madigan deserves another term as speaker, Rauner said late last week that he wasn’t going to comment on the matter, saying it’s a decision for lawmakers. “That’s their prerogative,” Rauner said.
His comments came just hours after the Rauner-funded state GOP blasted incoming Democratic Rep. Mike Halpin of Rock Island after he told a local TV station he would vote for Madigan.
Democrats have dismissed the campaign against Madigan as a distraction that makes reaching a budget resolution only more difficult.
“I don’t think that’s going to go anywhere, I mean nowhere,” Currie said. “So I don’t understand why they are spending time spinning their wheels on projects like that. They would be better off paying attention to the crisis that various programs and vulnerable people face after Jan. 1. I would say that’s plenty on our plate without having side spats.”
19 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|