Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Lots of criticism of Rauner veto, but a little support
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Lots of criticism of Rauner veto, but a little support

Wednesday, Aug 2, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Pritzker campaign…

Education leaders and editorial boards across the state are rebuking Bruce Rauner’s reckless veto of Senate Bill 1. From the Quad Cities to Belleville, Peoria, Rockford, Bloomington, and Springfield, Rauner is getting blasted for his recently debunked claim that SB 1 is a Chicago bailout and for vetoing a bill that ensures all Illinois schools open on time with the funding that they need.

Here’s what Illinoisans are reading across the state about Rauner’s school funding veto:

    Quad City Times: Rauner veto sends ripples through Illinois Q-C schools

    “I think the governor really swung and missed on this.” — East Moline School District 37 Superintendent Kristin Humphries

    “Right now, I’d like him to sign anything.” — Carbon Cliff-Barstow School District
    Superintendent Andy Richmond

    Elgin Courier-News: Fox Valley educators decry Rauner veto that puts school funding in question

    “SB1 is the closest we’ve ever come to fixing that formula to more fairly serve and support all students.” — Elgin School District U46 CEO Tony Sanders

    “Nobody knows when we’re going to get money now.” — East Aurora School District 131 Assistant Superintendent for Finance Mike Prombo

    “We’ll be on fumes heading toward September.” — West Aurora School District 129 Superintendent Jeff Craig

    Belleville News-Democrat: Will your kid’s school have enough money to get through the year?

    “It’s just not what should be on the minds of parents and folks who serve kids through schools.” — Belleville District 118 Superintendent Matt Klosterman

    “It’s just another thing that’s going to derail us, going through how we will have to do business differently until they get their act together.” — Triad District 2 Superintendent Leigh Lewis

    “We’ve been watching and hoping that everything would work itself out, but I’ve been prepping the board for the worst-case scenario.” — Collinsville Unit 10 Superintendent Robert Green

    “We have health insurance, power bills and other things that have to be paid and can’t be put off.” — Triad District 2 Superintendent Leigh Lewis

    Bloomington Pantagraph: Fate of school funding looms after Rauner’s veto

    Bloomington District 87 Superintendent Barry Reilly wants the state to “get an evidence-based funding model in place, which is required in the state budget. Anything short of that is problematic for us all.”

    Peoria Journal Star: Editorial: With stage set on SB1, lawmakers should choose people they represent over party

    So, is SB1 really a Chicago “bailout”? Just because a politician says something does not make it so, which applies to the governor like anybody else.

    PolitiFact Illinois, in partnership with the non-partisan Better Government Association, rates Rauner’s “bailout” claim an unequivocal “false.” Meanwhile, a Chicago Tribune opinion page as pro-Rauner as any in the state has written that “the bill is not a CPS bailout. Repeat: It is not a CPS bailout” while calling SB1 “the best chance in more than 20 years to begin shortening the bridge between what wealthy school districts can spend and what low-income school districts can offer.”

    If Democrats are not sinless in this unnecessary standoff, neither should Rauner get off the hook for fueling a very unhealthy Chicago-vs-the-rest-of-us balkanization that is too often knee-jerk and ignorant, from all sides. Last time we checked, Chicago is still within the boundaries of Illinois. Is a poor child there less deserving of an adequate and equitable education than one in Peoria?

    Rockford Register Star: Our View: Fair and equitable school funding should include help for Chicago

    “All of our children deserve to be treated fairly and be given the best education possible.”

    Gov. Bruce Rauner’s tweet should have added “unless those kids live in the city of Chicago.” […]

    SB1 is an evidenced-based model for how schools should be financed. There are adequacy targets and accountability measures that are meant to ensure that resources go to the schoolchildren who need them most. Staying true to the model helps drive student achievement, a goal we should all embrace. Some states have embraced the model, yet deviated from it, which has stalled student progress.

    The governor’s amendatory veto disrupts the model and probably would derail student progress.

    State Journal Register: Our View: School funding reform cannot wait

    This is not the time to dawdle.

    As promised, Gov. Bruce Rauner on Tuesday morning issued an amendatory veto of Senate Bill 1, a measure that would drastically change the way K-12 education funding is distributed in Illinois.

    There’s no doubt reform is needed: The state has the most inequitable K-12 funding in the country. There is agreement on key aspects of what is needed in a new formula, including that it be evidenced-based and that new dollars dedicated to education go first to the neediest districts. SB 1 proposed doing both.

    Chicago Sun-Times: Editorial: Chicago not alone in struggle with Rauner

    Not that Rauner was about to oblige them, or any of the other dozens of editorial boards, school superintendents and civic groups — up and down Illinois — urging him to sign Senate Bill 1. On Tuesday, as expected, he issued an amendatory veto of the bill, throwing education funding up for grabs weeks before schools are scheduled to open.

    To our thinking — and we really are speaking for ourselves now — it’s a cryin’ shame. Illinois has had its fill of foolish stand-offs between the governor and the Legislature, and SB 1 is better than just a bill worth signing. It’s a historic chance to reform education funding, easing decades of financial inequities between rich and poor school districts.
    “As Bruce Rauner continues to attack Chicago schoolchildren and mislead about SB 1, school districts and editorials across the state are blasting the failed governor,” said Pritzker campaign spokeswoman Jordan Abudayyeh. “No school district loses with SB 1, but all school districts lose with a governor creating lasting damage and leveraging schoolchildren to force his agenda.”

“As Bruce Rauner continues to attack Chicago schoolchildren and mislead about SB 1, school districts and editorials across the state are blasting the failed governor,” said Pritzker campaign spokeswoman Jordan Abudayyeh. “No school district loses with SB 1, but all school districts lose with a governor creating lasting damage and leveraging schoolchildren to force his agenda.”

* But a Public Radio station did find a superintendent who supported the governor’s veto

A school district superintendent in southeast Champaign County supports Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner’s amendatory veto of Senate Bill 1, the school funding bill. But Andy Larson with Unit Seven said he was frustrated that the issue has turned into a political game.

“It’s gets really frustrating when we are used as the biggest political pawn out there for everybody to get their own agendas taken care of,” he said.

And there are a bunch of stories that quote Republican legislators approving of the governor’s move (although, curiously enough, there was no roundup from the ILGOP today). Some outlets, like the SJ-R, ran headlines that focused on how Chicago got dinged, which probably goes over well with its readership.

* And the Illinois Policy Institute wants Rauner to go even further

Rauner was right to strip the CPS bailout and other bad elements from SB 1, but lawmakers should go even further and scrap SB 1 entirely. Beyond the CPS bailout, the “evidence-based” funding model within SB 1 will be an expensive failure.

Well, actually that paragraph has been deleted from the Institute’s website

But if you click here, you’ll see a screen grab from yesterday.

* There is no indication on the original story that it has been altered, so I e-mailed Ted Dabrowski, one of the authors, and asked why that paragraph no longer appears on his website. I haven’t heard back, but he tweeted this out ten minutes or so after I sent him my query…


The original content is currently posted on the Madison-St. Clair Record’s site.

       

20 Comments
  1. - Anon221 - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 1:53 pm:

    Dabrowski- “SB1/No SB1 is a false choice. Lawmakers should keep the existing formula until an agreement can be reached.”

    What current formula? Is he totally disregarding the budget overrides and the linkage language for education funding within? Honest ask, but I think I know the answer. If SB1 dies, schools will close before the end of the year, and not the school year… the year 2017. It took a couple of decades to get to SB1. A few months is not going to provide another workable bill IMHO because that is not in Rauner’s best interests. He needs the campaignin’ fodder of his chaos model.


  2. - Keyrock - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 1:58 pm:

    The Washington Post website had a critical story, too:
    “In a claim that belongs in the why-let-facts-get-in-the-way category, he said the legislation was a “bailout” of the financially beleaguered Chicago school system, the third-largest in the country. It wasn’t.”


  3. - Opiate of the Masses - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 1:59 pm:

    there is no existing formula, ted.

    i can’t blame ted for thinking that, yesterday he thought it took a simple majority to affirm the AV.

    this crew is the JV at a 1A school.


  4. - Arsenal - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 1:59 pm:

    Oh, so now IPI is content with the status quo, huh?

    Rauner just did a really lousy job lining up support for his move.


  5. - Gruntled University Employee - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 2:04 pm:

    ===this crew is the JV at a 1A school. ===

    As someone who was once JV at a 1A school, I take offense to that.


  6. - Ducky LaMoore - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 2:04 pm:

    ===Rauner just did a really lousy job lining up support for his move.===

    That really says it. There is no leadership. He is Jimmy Carter minus the best of intentions. He thinks he can sit on high and lecture us into subservience. He needs to have a talk with actual successful republican governors of this state like Thompson and Edgar who weren’t afraid to twist arms and find deals that could actually happen.


  7. - Opiate of the Masses - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 2:05 pm:

    +Oh, so now IPI is content with the status quo, huh?+

    that’s always been the end game. watch LUDA, Ed Red, EDGE et al…it’s where they have always wanted to keep it. The IPI put out a piece the other day saying to scrap it all and go back to old formula. this was always the end game with the governor and obfuscation is how you make that happen. if you keep ‘em dumb and confused, you get nothing. the gov is good at that.


  8. - Michelle Flaherty - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 2:07 pm:

    Bruce Rauner and the IPI, what’s wrong with the status quo?


  9. - Anon221 - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 2:07 pm:

    Rauner specifically named Bethalto in his list of schools that would benefit from his AV. Here’s the letter the school just sent out to parents:

    http://www.bethalto.org/uploads/1/6/2/8/16287686/pressreleasesb1v2.pdf


  10. - Arsenal - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 2:07 pm:

    ==He needs to have a talk with actual successful republican governors of this state like Thompson and Edgar who weren’t afraid to twist arms and find deals that could actually happen.==

    Well, even if he wants to play the outside game, play the outside game! But that means organizing supporters across the state, not just huddling with IPI and writing a couple speeches.


  11. - anon2 - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 2:17 pm:

    When even the Trib states SB1 is not a Chicago bailout, that should settle the matter.


  12. - Norseman - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 2:43 pm:

    Michelle, I’m cleaning off my shirt after reading your comment. LOL.


  13. - RNUG - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 2:46 pm:

    == this crew is the JV at a 1A school. ==

    You’re giving them too much credit. More like a “gentleman’s C” for a legacy at college.


  14. - DuPage Bard - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 2:50 pm:

    Real question- didn’t IPI win some real news awards? Seems they aren’t really making a case for themselves to defend their title?


  15. - Ghost - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 3:02 pm:

    In Rauners defense, he didnt just veto the whole thing and issue press releases about a chicago bailout. at least he put forth his counter.

    it horrible but at least its there. he gets leadership points for proffering an alternative.


  16. - ArchPundit - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 4:40 pm:

    ===But that means organizing supporters across the state, not just huddling with IPI and writing a couple speeches.

    See, the lurkers all agree with them.


  17. - Arthur Andersen - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 5:38 pm:

    RNUG, even the best of us may have received a “Gentleman’s C” or two during our collegiate time in an effort to be well-rounded young men. Ahem.


  18. - Chicago 20 - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 6:48 pm:

    This looks like a gross miscalculation by Rauner / IPI.
    The messy questionable messaging has the media seeing through the Rauner smoke screen and instead finding subterfuge.

    A poll in July had only 2/5ths of Illinois voters approving the job Rauner is doing with a 49% disapproval rating ranking Rauner 44th out of 50 Governors despite Rauner’s nonstop campaign ads.

    With IPI’s help Rauner should have no trouble knocking Christie out of the 50th spot.


  19. - Blue dog dem - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 8:12 pm:

    At the local coffee shop this morn, Rauner was 10-0 winner in messaging. ‘No more Chicago bailouts was the unanimous theme’. Not agree ing just reporting.


  20. - Newbie chic - Wednesday, Aug 2, 17 @ 8:41 pm:

    @Anon221
    ===Rauner specifically named Bethalto===
    Bethalto School District could cut back Admin instead. They could also consolidate Park Side & Meadowbrook with one Principle. Why did they need the bigger Admin office and why does everyone and their brother have a personal Secretary? And they have a former Grade school (West) wasting money. There is plenty they could do before laying off Teachers and other necessary staff.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller