Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » It looks like Ruiz was wrong about Raoul
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
It looks like Ruiz was wrong about Raoul

Thursday, Jan 25, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Some background is here. From the Tribune

Ruiz charged that at a forum with the Chicago Sun-Times this month, Raoul had defended taking the tobacco industry money by saying he’d had the contributions approved by the attorney general’s office. Raoul repeatedly disputed having said that.

“You cannot tell me what I said,” Raoul shouted at one point.

“I heard you,” said Ruiz.

“You are a serial liar,” Raoul replied.

* Transcript

Jesse Ruiz: Did the attorney general’s office advise you that it was OK or not OK? You said at the Sun-Times, you told the Sun-Times editorial board to their faces that the office of attorney general told you it was OK.

Kwame Raoul: That was not what I said.

Jesse Ruiz: That is what you said.

Kwame Raoul: Jesse, you cannot tell me what I said!

Jesse Ruiz: I heard you, that’s why I can tell you…

Kwame Raoul: You are a serial liar!

* Tina Sfondeles transcribed the actual exchange at the CS-T editorial board meeting

Aaron Goldstein: “Senator, if you were the attorney general, would you continue with the lawsuit against the tobacco companies?”

Raoul: “I talked to the attorney general. The attorney general does not control that lawsuit.”

Goldstein: “But you have oversight. You have oversight as attorney general. Would you remove yourself from it?”

Raoul: “The attorney general does not control that lawsuit. I checked with the donor and I checked with the attorney general’s office. They are a signatory to the settlement. The settlement is done. What happened is that …[ interrupted by others] Let me finish.”

Ruiz: “That is not true.”

Raoul: “First of all let me start with the fact that I am not for sale.”

Sharon Fairley: “No, because you’ve already been bought.”

…Adding… From the Ruiz campaign…

As reported by Crain’s Chicago business,

Levin’s Top Tobacco is one of the parties to the national pact that Madigan enforces and oversees here in Illinois. Madigan’s office confirms that it has opposed Top Tobacco in a series of arbitrations—one pending—in which it is seeking tens of millions of dollars from that company and others in a dispute over payments to the state from the tobacco settlement.

http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20171219/BLOGS02/171219876/tobacco-mogul-stokes-raouls-bid-for-illinois-ag

Kwame Raoul’s assertion to the Sun-Times’ editorial board that his donor has no pending action in front of the AG’s office is simply incorrect.

In addition, the Sun-Times article quotes Kwame as saying, “I checked with the donor, and I checked with the attorney general’s office.” Yet in front of the Tribune editorial board, Kwame denied that he consulted the attorney general’s office. That flatly contradicts Kwame’s earlier statement.

In the tale of the tapes, this one goes to Team Ruiz.

They’re twisting words.

       

24 Comments
  1. - Ravenswood Right Winger - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 1:56 pm:

    Is this Raoul’s first contested race? Because he seems totally distracted.


  2. - anon - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 2:05 pm:

    And to loose it by shouting…


  3. - pskila - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 2:05 pm:

    the attorney general’s race and the gubernatorial elections seem to boiling up at the same time.


  4. - TopHatMonocle - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 2:47 pm:

    No wonder Pat Quinn couldn’t stop smiling at the Trib meeting. Goldstein, Ruiz, and Fairley all pile onto Raoul while Rotering and Drury quibble over things happening in Highland Park.

    Also, I would dispute that Ruiz is wrong here. Raoul said he checked with the donor and with the AG office regarding a conflict of interest, and Raoul claimed at the Sun Times that it was a non-issue after checking with them. Sounds like what Ruiz said to me.


  5. - Tom - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 2:54 pm:

    If you don’t want Pat Quinn, you need to support Kwame.


  6. - theCardinal - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 2:56 pm:

    Tom: Spot On…. Quinn has name rec and a staedy line of bee s, oh and the #1 ballot spot. Go Kwame Go


  7. - DarkHorse - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 3:01 pm:

    Not a ton of voters pay attention to these forums, but donors and potential donors do, and will be interesting to see how Raoul and Quinn do on the “A-1” front over the next couple weeks.


  8. - m - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 3:11 pm:

    =If you don’t want Pat Quinn, you need to support Kwame.=

    I was under the impression that Rotering was exceeding expectations in fundraising and polling.


  9. - State worker - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 3:11 pm:

    If you don’t want Kwame Raoul, you need to support Quinn.


  10. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 3:18 pm:

    “If you don’t want Pat Quinn, you need to support Kwame.”

    If you want to lose to Erika Harrold, support either of these two. Kwame is an ethical train wreck. Pat will be an albatross around everyone’s neck. If you want to win, vote for someone else.


  11. - Anon - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 3:23 pm:

    - m -

    Maybe fundraising, but not polling.


  12. - Lucky Pierre - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 3:43 pm:

    Everyone but Senator Raoul distanced themselves from Speaker Madigan and Joe Berrios because they can apparently see which way the wind is blowing.

    Senator Raoul does not have the temperament or the judgement to be the top law enforcement officer in Illinois.


  13. - A guy - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 3:56 pm:

    If you know for certain something is a lie, for a fact, and it can be verified independently; calling someone a liar is a strong tool.


  14. - Anon324 - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 4:06 pm:

    =Also, I would dispute that Ruiz is wrong here. Raoul said he checked with the donor and with the AG office regarding a conflict of interest, and Raoul claimed at the Sun Times that it was a non-issue after checking with them. Sounds like what Ruiz said to me.=

    Raoul’s statement is that he checked with the donor and the AG’s office as to whether there is a pending lawsuit between the donor and AG. They both said no, and that’s all Raoul said. That’s different than what Ruiz accused him of at the Tribune forum. And Ruiz’s characterization citing the Crain’s report is incorrect on this, as well. As the article they cited to states, the Illinois portion of the arbitration that is pending has been completed.


  15. - 47th Ward - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 4:33 pm:

    ===the top law enforcement officer in Illinois===

    The Governor is the top law enforcement officer in Illinois. Period.

    The AG is like our civil attorney, handling consumer and public interest laws and defending the state itself. The AG, by statute, does NOT prosecute criminals except in the rarest of circumstances. We have 102 States Attorneys who prosecute crimes.

    The ignorance about this office makes my head hurt.


  16. - Chicago Cynic - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 4:40 pm:

    Anon324,

    I’m afraid you didn’t read the article very clearly. It doesn’t say the Illinois portion is completed. It just says Illinois was first and the arbitration now continues with other states. It says quite clearly, “A similar dispute currently is being arbitrated.” So you seem to be having the same reading problems Kwame does. And yea, he took 100,000 from a tobacco mogul with a case pending with the AG.

    “A similar dispute CURRENTLY is being arbitrated between Illinois and roughly 25 companies including Top Tobacco, the spokeswoman continued. “We were the first state to put on our case. The arbitration now continues with other states presenting their cases. We do not anticipate a ruling for about a year.”


  17. - Anon324 - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 4:55 pm:

    Chicago Cynic,

    This isn’t particularly difficult to comprehend. The statement is “We were the first state to put on our case. The arbitration now continues with other states presenting their cases. We do not anticipate a ruling for about a year.” The word “were” is a past-tense verb, indicating something has already taken place. Therefore, the statement indicates Illinois has already presented its case to the arbitrator, and they have nothing left to do on the matter other than wait for the other states to present their cases and for the arbitrator to make a ruling. What, in the article, indicates Illinois still has work to do on this case?

    Is Raoul’s answer lawyerspeak? Probably. But newsflash: the AG is a lawyer.


  18. - Chicago Cynic - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 5:18 pm:

    Anon324,

    The case is still pending. It is irrelevant whether evidence is still being presented. You don’t accept donations from someone with a pending matter before the office. This is a bright line and one Lisa Madigan has held her entire 16 years as attorney general. Furthermore, since Don Levin’s tobacco companies have had other disputes before and will likely do so again as long as the AG administers the tobacco settlement (which will go on for decades), there will be future cases. Again, this is a bright line apparent to all but Kwame.

    It’s also worth noting, that those same companies were also received special treatment in legislation that Kwame sponsored as Maze Jackson pointed out in his scathing post here (https://capitolfax.com/2017/12/21/raoul-pressed-again-on-tobacco-contributions/).


  19. - anon2 - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 5:25 pm:

    === Raoul: “First of all let me start with the fact that I am not for sale.” ===

    Conflict of interest or no, Sen. Raoul was a late convert to the State ban on indoor smoking in public places. I heard him argue against it circa 2006.


  20. - City Zen - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 5:27 pm:

    Kwame Raoul has come a long way, baby. By election time, I have no doubt Raoul will get lucky and this whole tobacco controversy will have blown over. I would walk a mile to vote for Raoul.


  21. - Soccermom - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 5:28 pm:

    Anon324 — You’re wrong. This case is still pending. And please note that the AG’s office said this was one of a series of actions against this tobacco mogul, and there are many more likely in the pipeline.

    Here’s how it works:

    In 1999, the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG), which under the MSA is
    responsible for coordinating and facilitating its implementation and enforcement on behalf of the
    attorneys general of the Settling States, formed the Tobacco Enforcement Committee, the
    Enforcement Working Group, which consists of attorney general office staff working on tobacco
    issues, and the Tobacco Project, which is comprised of staff attorneys within NAAG who
    support state enforcement efforts. (The NAAG Tobacco Project is now known as the NAAG
    Center for Tobacco and Public Health.)

    Enforcement typically begins when a state attorney general office or NAAG observes a potential violation of the MSA, or a member of the public or a public organization complains about a Participating Manufacturer’s marketing practices to a state attorney general or NAAG.

    Once a violation has been noted or a complaint has been filed, the process proceeds as follows:

    • A state or NAAG asks a company for information about the practice in question. If the
    practice is deemed a potential violation, it is referred to the Enforcement Committee.

    • The Enforcement Committee generally then sends a letter to the company stating the
    violation and asking for a specified action or response. Letters may be followed by
    discussion and may also include negotiating a formal, written settlement agreement.

    • If discussion fails, the Enforcement Committee decides whether to recommend
    enforcement actions by states, which then decide whether or not to initiate such actions.

    • A state must give a thirty-day notice to sue to enforce the MSA.Ten days’ notice is
    required to enforce the Consent Decree (the settlement contained in a court order).

    The Attorneys General have several remedies for addressing MSA violations, including litigation. If the plaintiff state prevails, it can seek injunctive relief or monetary remedies.

    A couple of points to note here, Anon324 (if that is your name):

    The Illinois AG may have presented its case as part of this multistate action, but that doesn’t mean it’s done. If the arbitrator rules in favor of the states, then the Illinois AG office will work to decide how much the tobacco company has to pay in fines. And depending on how long this arbitration takes, with all these states involved, the new Attorney General will likely be in office before that decision (which directly affects Levin’s bank account) is made.

    Also, this is not a “one and done” situation. These are ongoing issues. So when this arbitration is complete, there will be more. I am not predicting the future here; these have been annual events, and I think the AG’s office is currently litigating the 2009 cases, or something like that.

    To give you an idea of how long these cases take to move through the courts, take a look at this news release, published in 2013, trumpeting a victory in arbitration over something that happened in 2003. The panel of arbitrators in its ruling also concluded “Illinois had a strong enforcement environment” that was “very thorough” and “exceeded that of almost every other” state considered by the panel. That pretty much shows that ongoing enforcement is part of the AG’s core responsibilities. http://www.ag.state.il.us/pressroom/2013_09/20130912.html

    Here’s some background information on how all of this works: http://www.publichealthlawcenter.org/sites/default/files/resources/tclc-fs-msa-overview-2015.pdf

    As California AG Becerra notes: “The (AG’s) Tobacco Litigation and Enforcement Section holds the tobacco industry accountable for strict compliance with the MSA’s marketing restrictions and payment obligations. In addition, the Tobacco Section enforces a number of state laws and programs that regulate the promotion and sale of cigarettes and other tobacco products in the state, including the state’s Tobacco Directory and Reserve Fund Statute.” https://oag.ca.gov/tobacco/litigation

    New York AG Schneiderman stresses the continuing nature of this settlement oversight: “Enforcement focuses on guaranteeing that the tobacco companies are not violating the prohibitions against advertising and/or marketing directed to young people, brand-name advertising, merchandising and sponsorships, and false and misleading advertising as well as ensuring compliance with the tobacco companies’ monetary obligations under the MSA and New York’s related laws.”
    https://ag.ny.gov/bureau/tobacco-compliance-and-enforcement

    And a look at our very own AG’s website shows that tobacco manufacturers and distributors have to file quarterly affidavits to show that they are following all the rules. http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/tobacco/manufacturerinfo.html

    If you need any further information on how the Attorney General works to protect Illinois children from unscrupulous tobacco marketing, please let me know. We take these issues very seriously, so we do a lot of homework.


  22. - Soccermom - Thursday, Jan 25, 18 @ 5:47 pm:

    And for the TL:DR crowd: Levin’s case is still active and pending, and the AG’s office is, and will remain, on the other side from Kwame’s donor. It’s a clear conflict of interest, and he should never have taken the money.

    So here’s a newsflash backatcha: Kwame may be a lawyer, but he clearly lacks any understanding of basic legal conflicts issues.

    Here’s an interesting article on the topic. https://www.americanbar.org/newsletter/publications/gp_solo_magazine_home/gp_solo_magazine_index/conflictsofinterest.html


  23. - Anonymous - Friday, Jan 26, 18 @ 2:18 pm:

    47th Ward @ 4:33 pm- “The AG, by statute, does NOT prosecute criminals except in the rarest of circumstances.”

    That’s why public corruption flourishes in Illinois by design. When motorcyclist Bill Damhoff was killed by Whiteside County sheriff’s deputy Jeffrey Wunderlich in 2016, special prosecutor Thomas J. Brown from the Appellate Prosecutor’s office was appointed to the case. Yet Wunderlich has not been charged with manslaughter, and is back on patrol. In stagnant one-party rule counties like Whiteside, good old boy corruption can extend even to state offices.

    “We have 102 States Attorneys who prosecute crimes.”

    That statement is nonsense. If local State’s Attorneys were capable of prosecuting local officials, C.P.D. detective Jon Burge would have been convicted thirty years ago, when Richard M. Daley was the Cook County State’s Attorney. Almost every time that a state or local official or a cop is convicted in Illinois, it’s the U.S. Attorney that gets it done. Kwame is not impartial and is not suitable to bring equal justice under law to the citizens of Illinois.


  24. - Anon324 - Friday, Jan 26, 18 @ 2:39 pm:

    Chicago Cynic and Soccermom,

    That gets to the point of my rhetorical question. Did Raoul engage in lawyerspeak in maintaining there is no pending lawsuit (please note: he said lawsuit, not action; there is a difference) between the AG and the donor? Yes. Should that surprise anyone given the nature of the AG job? No.

    He’s entirely right to say “that’s not what I said.” His statement may have been misleading, but it wasn’t wrong.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* HGOPs whacked for opposing lame duck session
* Uber’s Local Partnership = Stress-Free Travel For Paratransit Riders
* Report: IDOC's prison drug test found to be 'wrong 91 percent of the time'
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Session update (Updated x2)
* Illinois Supreme Court rules state SLAPP law doesn't automatically protect traditional journalism (Updated)
* ‘This is how I reward my good soldiers’: Madigan ally testifies he was rewarded with do-nothing consulting contract
* Illinois Supreme Court rules that Jussie Smollett's second prosecution 'is a due process violation, and we therefore reverse defendant’s conviction'
* Dignity In Pay (HB 793): It Is Time To Ensure Fair Pay For Illinoisans With Disabilities
* It’s just a bill (Updated)
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller