Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » A slow-motion disaster
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
A slow-motion disaster

Friday, Jun 8, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Stefano Esposito in the Sun-Times

A federal judge in Chicago says the state of Illinois’ plan to boost wages for caregivers who work with the developmentally disabled falls “woefully short” of what’s required under a 7-year-old court decree.

U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman ordered state lawyers this week to come up with a better “long-term” plan to comply with the 2011 consent decree.

Coleman called the state’s proposal “a reasonable start,” but she wrote she “doubts that the proposal is adequate to address the issue of wages, staffing and retention.”

The judge’s order was the latest ruling stemming from the consent decree requiring the state Department of Healthcare and Family Services and Department of Human Services to provide adequate funding for people with developmental disabilities who want to live in an independent community setting.

“We are very pleased with the court’s decision rejecting the state’s plan for coming into compliance with the consent decree,” said Barry C. Taylor, an attorney with Equip for Equality, an advocacy group for the disabled that is among those suing the state. “This decision puts plaintiffs a step closer to realizing the promise of the consent decree: to receive services that allow them to become active, engaged and included members of their communities,”

* From a reader via e-mail…

Rich I know everything is about Tim Mapes but this ongoing saga in federal court - with the state in non-compliance for the Ligas Court Decree - continues to show a lack of commitment to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

What this really means is a weakened community provider system and forced reliance on more expensive state operations.

With an estimated difference of residential care in the community being $80k to State operations at $250-$300k; AND the Medicaid system computer disaster losing matching funds after dropping an estimated 150,000 eligible recipients - we are choosing an expensive, inefficient and now not paid for by the feds option.

You have Dir. Norwood leaving while the HFS Medicaid computer system to be fixed; you have a federal court saying DHS/DD has an insufficient plan for supporting people with disabilities.

The court order is here.

* From an analysis by the Institute on Public Policy for People with Disabilities

The Judge acknowledged the argument made by Plaintiffs and the Court Monitor, supported by data from the Institute, that the wage proposal was particularly inadequate in Chicago where minimum wage will rise to $12/hour on 7/1/18. Judge Coleman acknowledges that DSP wages were originally nearly twice as high as minimum wage and that gap has eroded since the inception of the CILA program. She acknowledges the State may not be able to raise current wages to that level, but “…this Court hesitates to affirm the devaluing of the role of caregivers for some of the more vulnerable members of society. At the same time, this Court is not in the position to act as super-legislator by dictating how the State should allocate funds and administer its budget.”

The Order further states that “it has been nearly seven years since the entry of the Consent Decree and this Court sees no end to the Court’s oversight.” The Order recommends convening a work group that includes the Monitor and other independent stakeholders to study DSP wages, the overall CILA and ICFSS rate methodologies and develop monitoring tools to assess the adequacy of services, funding and administration. The Order notes that ideally the monitoring tool would include an independent review component. The Court also agrees with the Court Monitor’s recommendation regarding expeditiously developing criteria for moving people off the PUNS list at a reasonable pace.

The final statement of the Order puts the onus for developing a solution to the problems it identified on the parties, acknowledging the Court’s lack of expertise and budgetary authority to impose measures to the resolve the issues outlined in the Order. Parties will return to Court on July 10, 2018 to discuss the Order.

       

4 Comments
  1. - wordslinger - Friday, Jun 8, 18 @ 9:46 am:

    –What this really means is a weakened community provider system and forced reliance on more expensive state operations.

    With an estimated difference of residential care in the community being $80k to State operations at $250-$300k; AND the Medicaid system computer disaster losing matching funds after dropping an estimated 150,000 eligible recipients - we are choosing an expensive, inefficient and now not paid for by the feds option.–

    That’s some brilliant management right there, fighting in court for an exponentially more expensive and outdated delivery system.


  2. - NeverPoliticallyCorrect - Friday, Jun 8, 18 @ 11:23 am:

    As someone who works in this field, the truth is the state has avoided it’s basic responsibilities for decades and this has led to a waiting list of about 20,000 (yes 20,000) people waiting for any type of support service after they finish high school. This means thousands of families struggling to provide appropriate care after high school ends for their child, it means maybe losing a job for a caregiver, it means losing developmental progress gained in high school. This mess goes far beyond the waiting list. It means we continue to warehouse people in state centers that are more for union members than they are for the person with the disability. It means wasting dollars on outmoded management structure in the Department of Human Services, and it means not even filling needed positions at the state level. As the saying from the Bible goes: Without a vision the people perish. This is happening with our most vulnerable citizens.


  3. - BobO - Friday, Jun 8, 18 @ 11:51 am:

    Wordslinger, I run a community disability organization and would be thrilled if residential rates were $80k on average.

    However, while there is a significant difference between what the state pays itself in their operations vs community group homes, we should not give the impression to the legislature and others that the community is a less expensive alternative.

    Illinois needs to rebalance the way it determines rates so that an individual receives sufficiently funded supports regardless of where they reside.


  4. - Perrid - Friday, Jun 8, 18 @ 3:42 pm:

    “That’s some brilliant management right there, fighting in court for an exponentially more expensive and outdated delivery system.”

    More like unintended consequences. If you can have robust community services at $10 instead of $13 you save money, obviously. Either is cheaper than residential. Question is how long can you keep that squeeze up before the system breaks and you start hurting patients AND costing the state more money. Think we’ve gone past that point by a long ways now.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* The Waukegan City Clerk was railroaded
* Whatever happened, the city has a $40 million budget hole it didn't disclose until now
* Manar gives state agencies budget guidance: Cut, cut, cut
* Roundup: Ex-Chicago Ald. Danny Solis testifies in Madigan corruption trial
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller