Illinois voters favor a graduated income tax by a two to one margin according the most recent poll released by the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University.
The Simon Poll was based on a statewide sample of 1,000 registered voters conducted March 11 through March 17. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.1 percent.
Respondents also endorsed a related proposal for adding a three percent increase to all income over one million dollars per year. Both these proposals are being advocated by Governor J. B. Pritzker as part of his plan for dealing with the chronic structural deficits Illinois has run since the turn of the 21st Century.
Sixty-seven percent of Illinois voters said they favored the graduated tax plan, “… that is, tax rates would be lower for lower-income taxpayers and higher for upper income taxpayers.” Just under one-third, (31 percent) opposed the plan. The plan received high levels of support across all three major geographic divisions of Illinois with the highest level of support coming from Chicago (74 percent). Voters in suburban Cook and the Collar Counties supported the plan by a 68 percent to 31 percent margin, while 60 percent of downstate voters supported and 37 percent opposed the plan.
In the partisan breakdown, 88 percent of Democrats and 65 percent of Independents favored the plan, while 55 percent of Republicans opposed and 43 percent supported the plan. Only ten percent of Democrats opposed and 31 percent of Independents opposed the graduated income tax plan.
When asked a related and more specific plan for increasing the income tax by 3 percent on all incomes over $1 million annually, 71 percent of voters statewide favored and 27 percent opposed the so-called “millionaire’s tax,” while 27 percent opposed.
The 3 percent surtax on million-dollars incomes was favored by majorities of all three geographical regions and of all three partisan groups. Seventy-five percent of Chicago voters favored while 24 percent opposed this proposal; seventy-one percent of suburban voters in Cook and the Collar Counties favored and 27 percent opposed. Downstate, the plan was favored by 70 percent and 29 percent opposed. Democrats favored the tax increase on incomes over one million dollars per year with 90 percent supporting the measure, compared to only 9 percent in opposition, while 69 percent of Independents supported and 27 percent opposed. Somewhat surprisingly, a bare majority (51 percent) of Republicans supported and 47 percent opposed the three percent increase in taxes for the portion of annual income that exceeds $1 million. […]
Aside from depending on the graduated income tax as the governor advocates, there are other routes to raising increased revenue, several of which are being considered this term in the legislature. Those sources would produce immediate revenue increases for the next two fiscal years. The poll also assessed most of those possible sources of new revenue.
At the top of this list is the proposal to legalize recreational marijuana and regulate and tax it like alcohol. This has become a top legislative item for the Pritzker administration. Sixty-six percent of the respondents favored or strongly favored the plan while 32 percent opposed.
The differences in levels of support are not particularly large by region, but they are in the direction we expected. The highest level of support is in the City of Chicago, where three- quarters (75 percent) favored it and 24 percent opposed. The next highest level of support was in suburban Cook and the Collar Counties with 67 percent favoring and 31 percent opposed. The lowest support levels were downstate, but here, too, the support was well above a majority, at 57 percent favoring with 39 percent opposed.
The partisan differences were fairly marked and as we expected. Seventy-nine percent of Democratic respondents favored legalizing and taxing marijuana, and 65 percent of Independents favored it. The Republicans were virtually tied at 49 percent in favor and 48 percent opposed.
“This may be one of those public policy shifts—like gay marriage—whose time comes fairly quickly. Given the solid support it receives across almost all the groups we surveyed, its strong advocacy from the Pritzker Administration, and aversion to higher taxes, the legislature may feel emboldened to legalize and tax marijuana,” said Charlie Leonard, a co-director of the Simon Poll.
There has long been a movement to expand gambling in the state, and the current Simon Poll presented a generic question about it as it has in the past. This proposal received majority support statewide and across both geographic and partisan divisions. Fifty-seven percent of all respondents favored or strongly favored it, with 40 percent opposed or strongly opposed. Support was highest in the City of Chicago (65 percent), next highest in the suburbs at 56 percent, followed closely by downstate voters at 54 percent.
Support for expanding gambling was spread almost evenly across the three major partisan groups with 59 percent of Democrats, 57 percent of Republicans, and 54 percent of Independents favoring it. This is another policy shift which seems to have a good deal of momentum in the General Assembly and widespread support among the public.
A natural extension of the gambling issue is the recent drive to legalize gambling on sporting events. Several states have already legalized or are planning to legalize sports betting due to a recent U. S. Supreme Court decision favoring it. Statewide almost two-thirds (63 percent) favored or strongly favored while one-third (33 percent) opposed legalized gambling on sports events.
This is another proposal which garnered support from substantial majorities across both geographic and partisan divides. Seventy-two percent of Chicago voters favored and only 26 percent opposed it. Comparable levels of support were found in the suburbs with 63 percent supporting and 33 percent opposing and downstate with 57 percent supporting and 37 percent opposing the legalization of sports betting.
Partisan differences were relatively small also with 66 percent of Democratic voters favoring and 60 percent of Republicans favoring the proposal, leaving 60 percent of Independents supporting allowing gambling on sports events. On the negative side, 30 percent of Democrats, 34 percent of Republicans, and 36 percent of Independents opposed sports gambling.
The possibility of expanding the base of service taxes in order to more accurately reflect the realities of a 21st Century service economy has been on the state’s political agenda for several years. Currently Illinois only taxes 17 categories of services compared to the national average of 56 with a total of 168 categories of services taxed across all states combined. So Illinois is a low tax state in terms of taxes on services.
The Simon Poll asked if respondents favored or opposed, “expanding the sales tax to cover the same services as Wisconsin currently taxes such as a sales tax on entertainment tickets, cable and internet services, landscaping and parking, which are not currently taxed?”
Statewide, 36 percent favored or strongly favored this proposal and 61 percent opposed or strongly opposed it. The highest level of support was in Chicago, where 41 percent supported and 56 percent opposed; followed by downstate where 36 percent supported and 60 percent opposed. The suburbs were marginally the lowest on level of support with 34 percent who supported and 63 percent who opposed.
Partisan differences were as expected, with 47 percent of Democrats favoring and 50 percent opposing expanding the service tax base; 30 percent of Republicans favoring and 66 percent opposing; and 29 percent of Independents favoring and 67 percent opposing.
Since the Pritzker Administration assumed office in January, there has been a great deal of discussion of and movement toward a capital plan. A significant number or other states have adopted an infrastructure plan paid for by motor fuel tax increases recently. Illinois has not had a capital plan since 2010, when Governor Pat Quinn instituted one. Multiple reports have touted the need for new infrastructure and repair of what’s already in place. The problem is, of course, how to pay for such a plan. The most common and most likely source is an increase on the motor fuel tax.
Thirty-seven of the respondents favored and 61 percent opposed the gas tax increase. Support and opposition varied both by region and by partisanship. A majority 52 percent of Chicago residents favored the plan; while in the suburbs 34 percent supported it; and downstate 33 percent supported and 65 percent opposed increasing the gas tax.
Two additional questions on potential revenue sources were interrelated. The Simon Poll has consistently asked whether voters favored applying the state income tax to retirement income. The results have generally been negative on this proposition and this year was no exception. Statewide, 73 percent of the respondents said they somewhat opposed or strongly opposed making this change, while a net of only 23 percent either favored or somewhat favored.
Twenty-nine percent of the residents of Chicago favored and 67 percent opposed taxing retirement income such as Social Security. The idea was even less popular in the suburbs and downstate where only 23 percent and 18 percent respectively favored this change.
Twenty-nine percent of Democrats favored and 67 percent opposed; while 18 percent of Independents and Republicans supported with over 70 percent opposed in both groups.
The final question in the search for possible sources of new revenue is a variation on taxing retirement. It tested the proposition of putting a tax on retirement income if the first $100,000 were exempted from the tax. It was only asked of those respondents (N = 732) who had indicated they were opposed to taxing retirement income in the previous question. Here the statewide division was much closer with 36 percent favoring and 34 percent opposed. There were essentially no notable differences by place of residence or partisanship.
- Da Big Bad Wolf - Tuesday, Mar 26, 19 @ 3:47 pm:
With the MOE at 3.1 there might not have been any change in opinion about the fair tax.
- JS Mill - Tuesday, Mar 26, 19 @ 3:51 pm:
@CZ will be disappointed in the poll results.
- Iggy - Tuesday, Mar 26, 19 @ 3:55 pm:
66% favor legalized pot, good thing the govs office called off today’s meeting, wouldn’t want to work on that policy proposal.
- Grandson of Man - Tuesday, Mar 26, 19 @ 3:56 pm:
Good news for Pritzker. People in all regions support it at least at 60 percent. No wonder the right wing absolutely refuses to let the voters decide. There’s a realistic shot voters approve this in a presidential election year.
Taxes will likely be a major issue in 2020. Trump and the GOP slashed taxes for the super-rich and caused a record federal deficit. Now Trump is all in on finding the ACA unconstitutional in a court case and repealing health insurance. Attacking the ACA hurt the GOP in 2018. How many MAGA voters will there be to fight the multibillionaires’ battles?
- PJ - Tuesday, Mar 26, 19 @ 3:58 pm:
I did a quick t test. The drop is definitely statistically significant, and understandable given the GOP push against it. But obviously they still need to turn a bunch more people to stop it.
- illini - Tuesday, Mar 26, 19 @ 4:11 pm:
I think it is fair to state that polling for any reason, proposition or candidate should be viewed with some suspicion because of the way questions are framed and responses solicited.
Yet, after so many years of polling, so much good research and so many valuable contributions to the discussion of important topics that its value as an invaluable state asset be recognized and supported. Many of us appreciate this work that the Institute does.
- Illinois Resident - Tuesday, Mar 26, 19 @ 4:26 pm:
Hopefully we don’t turn out like New Jersey and not get full legislative support when clearly a large majority of our population wants recreational cannabis legalized.
- The Dude Abides - Tuesday, Mar 26, 19 @ 4:29 pm:
Good news for Pritzker but the bad news is that it’s another year and a half before the voters can decide. That’s a long time for those who oppose it to continue to spread the anti tax propaganda on social media and TV.
It just affirms what I’ve always thought, most people don’t oppose higher taxes as long as it’s someone else who’s paying them.
- Kentucky Bluegrass x Featherbed Bent x Northern California Sinsemilla - Tuesday, Mar 26, 19 @ 4:53 pm:
Yeah but those 66% favoring legalized pot didn’t say when they wanted it legalized, best to go slow. /s
- Illinois Resident - Tuesday, Mar 26, 19 @ 5:21 pm:
Kentucky Bluegrass - Really? Either you are for or against cannabis legalization. This is not hard.
- A Jack - Tuesday, Mar 26, 19 @ 5:33 pm:
This year’s poll was conducted after the 2018 filing season started and many noticed the impact of the loss of the federal SALT deductions. That may have may made a few more taxpayers (3.1 percent) sour on any changes in taxes. There was also a similarly sized drop in support for the gasoline tax increaseiver the previous year.
- Lester Holt’s Mustache - Tuesday, Mar 26, 19 @ 6:35 pm:
Marty Moylan said to tell you 66% really isn’t that much, when you think about it
- Collinsville Kevin - Tuesday, Mar 26, 19 @ 6:38 pm:
Yeah, that Marty is one deep thinker.
- Nonbeleiver - Tuesday, Mar 26, 19 @ 7:57 pm:
Is there a test to determined when one is legally impaired under Marijuana as there is for alcohol?
Real question. If there is - great. if not then this is a real issue
Have no problem with using weed in one’s own home.
But in public and on the road.
- LetsLegalizeIt - Tuesday, Mar 26, 19 @ 8:32 pm:
There you go, Mr. Miller. I believe you asked me for some hard data that people support legalization on your question of the day.
- Rabid - Wednesday, Mar 27, 19 @ 1:25 am:
Is there a test? Will you have to study for it? What kinda drugs we be testing?
- Rabid - Wednesday, Mar 27, 19 @ 1:31 am:
If you want to test people driving under medication, do all the pharmaceuticals, don’t just pick and choose
- Rabid - Wednesday, Mar 27, 19 @ 2:55 am:
Driving on oxycotten doesn’t seem to be a manufactured problem
- truthteller - Wednesday, Mar 27, 19 @ 7:21 am:
opponents to legalized recreation pot ALL are special interest that can see profit/job losses from police to lawyers to bar owners. No different than when we had the fight to rid ourselves of Prohibition.
- Not a Billionaire - Wednesday, Mar 27, 19 @ 8:15 am:
I might go with a modest capital bill so as not to tuck the electorate off before the big vote.
- Toner - Wednesday, Mar 27, 19 @ 8:32 am:
I’m a cop, and Marty Moylan is my rep, and I fully support legalizing marijuana ASAP. Make open possession (a lit or smoking joint) of it in the vehicle a citation, like open alcohol, and make people do field sobriety if you’ve got the PC to make a traffic stop based on erratic/impaired driving. Come on people- this isn’t rocket science.
- Not a Billionaire - Wednesday, Mar 27, 19 @ 8:48 am:
IDOT is to blame for some of its problems. I will look at just us 20 . In the 80s they were making it 3 lane. Then they stopped and focused on a fantasy freeway. There are many more examples.
- Rich Miller - Wednesday, Mar 27, 19 @ 9:07 am:
===I believe you asked me for some hard data that people support legalization===
You’re wrong. I know people support legalization. Everybody knows that.
- Illinois Resident - Wednesday, Mar 27, 19 @ 9:25 am:
Toner - Thank you for your service and your common sense on the cannabis legalization topic.
- Illinois Resident - Wednesday, Mar 27, 19 @ 9:46 am:
Toner - One more thought. It is really a shame that the legislatures have forced police officers to arrest non violent drug users across this country. It has dramatically decreased relations between the public and police. It has also made your job more dangerous. Thankfully and hopefully we are moving away from these draconian policies.
- NotMe - Wednesday, Mar 27, 19 @ 11:29 am:
Nonbeliever: When the ticket bill was passed a couple of years ago, prosecutors asked for, and got a measurable level of thc in blood or saliva to establish a per se standard for impairment. It’s in line with Oregon & Washington. It’s imperfect, but better than the old zero tolerance we had before. There’s a roadside test available for saliva testing, in minimal use currently, but still being tested. Also, what Toner said.
- Anonymous - Wednesday, Mar 27, 19 @ 12:15 pm:
==You’re wrong. I know people support legalization. Everybody knows that.==
I was wrong when I said “support legalization”. What I meant to say is that you doubted that a majority were unhappy with “slow it down legalization”. This poll now supports my claim that you were wrong. But I don’t really have any particularly interest in hounding you about this, so I’ll let the facts speak for themselves.