Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Poll: 60 percent support cannabis legalization, just 35 percent oppose
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Poll: 60 percent support cannabis legalization, just 35 percent oppose

Monday, May 20, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller

* I’d really like to see Think Big spend some money on district-by-district polling, but here you go…

Today, Think Big Illinois released a new poll showing that marijuana legalization enjoys broad support from Illinoisans across the state. When asked whether marijuana should be legalized, taxed, and regulated just like alcohol, 60% support it, with 35% opposing. Support spans across the state – 60% in the city of Chicago, 68% in suburban Cook County, 60% in the Collar counties, and 54% Downstate.

“As discussions in Springfield continue surrounding marijuana legalization, it’s clear that Illinoisans are strongly in favor of legalization,” said Quentin Fulks, Executive Director of Think Big Illinois. “Legalization would help end the era of mass incarceration, while creating much-needed revenue for our state. Legislators should do what Illinoisans are calling for and enact this commonsense measure to make Illinois a more safe, just, and equal place for all our residents.”

* From the polling memo

• Six out of ten voters support legalizing recreational marijuana, taxing it and regulating it (60% support vs. 35% oppose). Notably, a plurality of voters strongly supports legalizing marijuana (41% strongly support, 19% somewhat support, 7% somewhat oppose, 27% strongly oppose and 6% don’t know).

    o What voters heard: Do you support or oppose legalizing recreational marijuana, taxing it, and regulating it just like alcohol? [IF SUPPORT/OPPOSE] Is that strongly or somewhat?

• Legalizing recreational marijuana enjoys broad support across the state.

    o City of Chicago: 60% support vs. 33% oppose
    o Cook County Suburbs outside Chicago: 68% support vs. 26% oppose
    o Collar Counties: 60% support vs. 37%oppose
    o Downstate: 54% support vs. 40% oppose

• Our findings are consistent with the recent independent Simon poll. Statewide, 66% of respondents favored or strongly favored legalization, while 32% opposed it, the Simon Institute poll found.

Interesting that support is stronger in the Cook County suburbs than in the city.

I take some issue with the question because the proposal on the table doesn’t regulate cannabis like alcohol. There is no three-tiered system (brewer, distributor, retailer), for example, and home grow is now imperiled.

Also, remember that it’s almost always unwise to directly compare one pollster’s results to another’s. The best practice is to average the results.

* Methodology

Global Strategy Group conducted a statewide telephone survey between April 29, 2019 and May 1 among 802 Illinois registered voters. The survey had a margin of error of +/-3.5%. Care has been taken to ensure the geographic and demographic divisions of the population of registered voters are properly represented.

       

12 Comments
  1. - ArchPundit - Monday, May 20, 19 @ 12:14 pm:

    I wonder if the wiping out of past convictions as part of the package would increase city support–they may have asked that, but it isn’t clear from the memo.


  2. - LetsLegalizeIt - Monday, May 20, 19 @ 12:39 pm:

    Doesn’t surprise me at all that Cook county supports it more than the city. I’ve met a lot of 420-friendly people in the northwest suburbs.

    In any case, this clearly shows that the articles from the Chicago Sun Times and Herald that claim that legalization support is down are blatant lies meant to manipulate the narrative. It’s disappointing to receive such clear evidence that two major news outlets in your state are clearly biased.


  3. - Anonymous - Monday, May 20, 19 @ 1:47 pm:

    Just how many people are being held in prison(or even jail) for these soon to be legalized offenses? How big a dent in the “era of mass incarceration” would this reform make? Rich points out opponents rhetorical excesses, but someone has answers about the mass incarceration impact claims. While important to those in custody, I bet you couldn’t fill a bus load of folks releasable under this bill. But ending the era of mass incarceration sounds as persuasive on one side as the increases in youth usage does in the other. Facts are in convenient, unless they can be ignored.


  4. - nice things - Monday, May 20, 19 @ 2:25 pm:

    I bet even more than 60% support legalization. I don’t think that’s the problem. The problem comes up when you talk to people about implementation. Do they support a marijuana store down the block from them or in their neighborhood or town.


  5. - I MIss Bentohs - Monday, May 20, 19 @ 3:00 pm:

    Now ask if people should be able to grow it at home and you will see that many of us that support it only care about the word taxing when you say:
    legalizing recreational marijuana, taxing it, and regulating it just like alcohol


  6. - Illinois Resident - Monday, May 20, 19 @ 3:01 pm:

    -Do they support a marijuana store down the block from them or in their neighborhood or town.-

    Yes, if you are for it you have to buy it somewhere. Stores are pretty sophisticated these days.


  7. - Ho-Flo - Monday, May 20, 19 @ 4:39 pm:

    As a resident of Homewood, a south suburb of Chicago my observations is that the medical dispensary has been an excellent business and neighbor in the community. They set up booths at the farmers market for outreach and education, and they operate discreetly within the confines of the medical law. I don’t know why some municipalities are afraid of dispensaries; its little different than operating a liquor store, of which these oppositional neighborhoods probably already have several.


  8. - Da Big Bad Wolf - Monday, May 20, 19 @ 4:46 pm:

    ==I bet you couldn’t fill a bus load of folks releasable under this bill.==

    I doubt the number of people expunged is a dealbreaker for people who want recreational marijuana legal.
    It would be nice for the people involved ( and their families).


  9. - trueallday - Monday, May 20, 19 @ 5:01 pm:

    Police are frightened at losing a significant element of their power. Traffic stops leading to marijuana discovery in legal pat downs will go out the window. A principle way of intimidating people of color driving ‘where they’re not supposed to be’.


  10. - Jocko - Monday, May 20, 19 @ 6:27 pm:

    ==Do they support a marijuana store down the block from them or in their neighborhood or town.==

    They might if it increased their property value. https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-home-values-marijuana-dispensaries-illinois-20190513-story.html


  11. - {Sigh} - Tuesday, May 21, 19 @ 4:12 am:

    There is a difference in supporting an issue vs supporting a proposal as drafted. Not sure the same %’s would support SB 7. The bill needs a lot of work before May 31st.


  12. - XonXoff - Tuesday, May 21, 19 @ 8:25 am:

    – There is a difference in supporting an issue vs supporting a proposal as drafted. Not sure the same %’s would support SB 7. –

    That’s a good point. If they were legalizing, taxing and regulating cannabis “just like” alcohol, it would be easy and apparently what most want. For the over-21 crowd, homegrow would be included, like home brewing and winemaking. Making high THC extracts/concentrates would be the equivalent of distilling high alcohol content spirits and not included (in Illinois). You could fill the trunk of your car with cannabis flower and drive around with no legal worries. You could serve or gift your over-21 friends cannabis with no legal worries. Taxes would be a lot lower and the license to sell it in your store would be $1500 or so. You could also sit in a neighborhood pub or a baseball stadium and enjoy cannabis with friends and then just get in your car and drive away.

    It’s never going to happen like that with a Governor and legislators in the middle, IMHO.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* The Waukegan City Clerk was railroaded
* Whatever happened, the city has a $40 million budget hole it didn't disclose until now
* Manar gives state agencies budget guidance: Cut, cut, cut
* Roundup: Ex-Chicago Ald. Danny Solis testifies in Madigan corruption trial
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller