You were expecting good news?
Tuesday, Sep 17, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Moody’s…
Moody’s has released its adjusted net pension liabilities (ANPL) for U.S. states for Fiscal Year 2018 (states report their pending funding positions with a one-year lag, so this year includes the strong market performance of FY 2017). Total state ANPL was $1.56 trillion in FY18, a 3.6% drop from FY17. The median state ANPL for FY18 was $12.2 billion, which represents 91.5% of state revenues.
The five states with the highest ANPL were Illinois ($240.8 billion/505.1% of revenue), Kentucky ($45.9 billion/308.7% of revenue), Connecticut ($62.1 billion/285.8% of revenue), New Jersey ($113.8 billion/274.9% of revenue), and Maryland ($59.3 billion/236.5% of revenue). The five states with the lowest ANPL were North Carolina ($9.4 billion/31.4% of revenue), Tennessee ($6.4 billion/32.3% of revenue), North Dakota ($1.8 billion/32.6% of revenue), New York ($39.2 billion/40.2% of revenue), and Iowa ($4.8 billion/43% of revenue).
* Greg Hinz…
Moody’s uses a lower discount rate than others who monitor state debt, which tends to increase the size of Illinois’ hole. Ergo, according to the bond-rating firm, Illinois’ adjusted net pension liability as of June 30, 2018, stood at a cool $240.8 billion.
That’s more than any other state, with California coming in second—its population is more than three times ours—at $230.8 billion and Texas coming in third at $132.8 billion.
Difficult as it is to fathom, Illinois’ figure actually was a little worse this time a year ago, topping $250 billion in unfunded liabilities. But according to Moody’s, the whole reason for the decline was the market, which was really hot but lately has been pretty flat. With Illinois putting in only about two-thirds of what we need to hold even—Moody’s so-called “tread water” line—the hole probably already has resumed growing, it says.
And it will continue to grow because that’s the Edgar pension ramp. The state will gradually work its way up to “tread water” status and then beyond. Candidate and Governor-elect Pritzker pledged to put money into the system up front to get ahead of the ramp, but Gov. Pritzker has stopped talking about that idea.
By the way, Moody’s says the state’s Adjusted Net Pension Liability per capita in Illinois is $18,896. The national median is $2,903 per capita. Mean is $4,883.
84 Comments
|
Question of the day
Tuesday, Sep 17, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Capitol News Illinois…
The Illinois Gaming Board said Monday that state lawmakers need to change a law they enacted earlier this year if they ever hope to see a casino developed in the city of Chicago.
That vote came in response to a feasibility study released in August that said such a casino would not be feasible given the “onerous tax and fee structure” that lawmakers imposed.
At its regular monthly meeting in Chicago, the board voted unanimously to adopt a resolution stating that, “based on results of the study as required by the Illinois Gambling Act, the board recommends that the General Assembly consider making modifications to the terms of the Chicago casino license authorized under the Illinois Gambling Act.”
* The Question: Should the Illinois General Assembly lower the tax rate for the Chicago casino or should the city try to bid out the license with the current rates? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please…
online polls
31 Comments
|
* Hannah Meisel at the Daily Line…
Staff at all levels of the Illinois’ beleaguered Department of Children and Family Services is not responsive to calls, several stakeholders have told The Daily Line, pointing to major communications issues as one reason for the agency’s troubles in recent years.
But some say the slowness to respond has gotten worse in the months since new agency Director Marc Smith was appointed by Gov. JB Pritzker in March. Smith came to DCFS from the state’s largest nonprofit provider of services to families in crisis and worked for the department from 1993-2000. […]
DCFS spokesperson Jassen Strokosch said the agency’s mid- and high-level staff has seen a lot of reorganization in the last few months, which may explain why those on the outside are having issues getting in touch with the right people. […]
[Jill Glick, a physician with the University of Chicago and founder of its Child Advocacy and Protective Services team] said issues within DCFS — especially communication — is “probably the worst it’s been.”
“Cases are getting reassigned between workers a lot,” Glick said. “They’re so understaffed because of changeovers. The reality is, many workers I’ve worked with for over 10 years, who were rapid-fire responders, are not answering their phones.” […]
“I don’t know if [Smith] is aware of it,” Glick said. “It’s crucial they know the phone is not getting answered right now. I work my behind off. They all have our personal cell phone numbers…Mark Smith needs to be answering his phone and listening to this stuff.”
And when stakeholders tried to speak with Director Smith after a recent legislative hearing, he blew them off.
13 Comments
|
It’s just a bill
Tuesday, Sep 17, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Press release…
State Senator Andy Manar (D-Bunker Hill) gathered with fellow state lawmakers and diabetes health advocates in Springfield Tuesday to urge support for new a new measure aimed at reducing the skyrocketing price of insulin.
“There are people in this state who have to choose between buying their prescription insulin and paying for groceries or making their mortgage payment,” Manar said. “These prices are absolutely out of control and we have a responsibility as lawmakers to take immediate action to ensure that every person has access to the care they need.”
Senate Bill 667, introduced by Manar, would cap out of pocket insulin expenses at $100 for a 30-day supply.
Manar was joined by State Rep. Sue Scherer (D-Decatur) to push for the legislation’s passage and hear from individuals who have been directly impacted by rising insulin costs.
“It’s been 10 years since the insulin I need to survive was only $800. Now it cost $1800,” said Megan Blair, a single mother who has experienced firsthand the consequences of rising insulin costs. “Something needs to change. Something has to be done about this.”
According to the American Diabetes Association, there are over 30 million Americans who have diabetes, 7.4 million of which require prescription insulin every day to survive. However, the increasing costs associated with the medication have led many patients to ration their supply or seek care outside of the country.
The legislation would make Illinois just the second state in the country to cap out of pocket insulin expenses. Colorado became the first to do so earlier this year.
“We cannot continue to sit back and allow drug companies to charge exorbitant prices on lifesaving medication that people depend on every day,” said Rep. Will Guzzardi, the bill’s lead sponsor in the House. “Instead of crushing Illinois consumers to pad corporate profits, let’s take real action to prioritize the actual health and well-being of Illinois residents who rely on insulin.”
The legislation has also garnered the support of several advocacy organizations, including the American Diabetes Association, Illinois State Medical Society, Illinois Pharmacists Association and AARP.
“AARP Illinois supports this measure on behalf of our 1.7 million members, many of whom have told us about the hardships they face in paying for their prescription drugs,” said State Director Bob Gallow. “We commend Sen. Manar, Rep. Guzzardi, and other legislators for recognizing that everyday Illinois residents are having to make heartbreaking choices about whether to pay for medicine or other basic necessities with their fixed incomes. And we hope that SB 667 will be a stepping stone to getting further reforms that will lower the cost of prescription drugs for everyone.”
Opponents include the Illinois Chamber of Commerce, the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, the Illinois Manufacturers’ Association, BlueCross BlueShield of Illinois, Eli Lilly and Company, the Illinois Insurance Association, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America and others.
* More from AARP…
* Peoria Public Radio…
Manar was joined by state Sen. Dave Koehler (D-Peoria), state Rep. Jehan Gordon-Booth (D-Peoria), two people with diabetes, and local health care professionals. Gordon-Booth said it’s important to remember African-Americans are twice as likely to deal with diabetes than non-Hispanic whites.
“If we’re talking about ensuring the ability of people to live safe and healthy lives, they have to have access to insulin. It’s not optional. It’s mandatory,” she said.
She said several members of her family have struggled with this issue, and mentioned she struggles with high blood pressure despite maintaining a healthy diet and lifestyle.
* Journal Star…
Because she struggles to pay for insulin, Megan Blair has been hospitalized multiple times in the 10 years since she was diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes at the age of 18. […]
“It turned into a game for me. How much insulin could get me through the day? If I don’t give myself all the insulin I need in one day, I would have leftovers for the next day and maybe I could learn how to turn this 30-day supply into a 60-day supply,” she said. “Well, this worked for a little bit, until my body couldn’t keep functioning … I ended up in the hospital several times.” […]
“The total cost of care of patients with diabetes goes up when you don’t take care of diabetes, making them at increased risk for heart attacks and strokes. Who pays for that? Everybody who pays taxes pays for that, and everyone that has private insurance pays for that through increased insurance costs,” said [Dr. Gregg Stoner, the medical director for the Heartland Clinic]. “So while patients suffer from the physical consequences of diabetes, we all share in the cost.” […]
“In Colorado, where they have already passed a similar bill, it has not raised any costs of insurance on anybody else,” said Koehler. “If you think about it, making sure people have insulin when they need it probably prevents a lot of ER visits, and a lot of other medical costs that could have been avoided.”
…Adding… International context…
9 Comments
|
State kicks off tax amnesty program
Tuesday, Sep 17, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Press release…
Illinois taxpayers who incurred tax liabilities between July 1, 2011 and June 30, 2018 may be eligible for the one-time tax amnesty program. Beginning October 1, 2019, eligible taxpayers who pay their eligible tax liabilities in full will have associated penalties and interest waived. Taxpayers have until November 15, 2019 to make a full payment on their liabilities and file the required paperwork with the Illinois Department of Revenue (IDOR).
“Now is an excellent opportunity for taxpayers with tax liabilities to pay what they owe and come into compliance with the law,” said David Harris, Illinois Department of Revenue Acting Director. “By taking advantage of this amnesty program, taxpayers can eliminate any eligible tax debts owed, without penalty or interest. This allows them to have a clean tax slate with the State of Illinois. The Department of Revenue is committed to achieving a tax system where everyone pays their fair share and citizens can trust they are treated equitably. This one-time amnesty program helps us achieve that goal.”
During budget negotiations this year, Governor Pritzker proposed a tax amnesty program for taxpayers who have state tax liabilities, and the General Assembly agreed to include the program as part of this year’s fiscal budget. The Governor’s Office of Management and Budget estimates the tax amnesty program will recover $175 million in outstanding tax liabilities.
To participate in Illinois’ Tax Amnesty Program, taxpayers must pay all outstanding tax on an amnesty qualifying period in order to have eligible penalties and interest waived. Taxpayers who failed to file during the original filing period will need to file an original return in addition to making full payment of tax due. For taxpayers who want to report changes to previously filed returns, an amended tax return and full payment of tax due are required. The tax amnesty program includes most types of tax liabilities and penalties, but excludes taxes not collected by IDOR, such as property or local government taxes, and some fees, such as bad check fees and outside collection agency fees.
* Tribune…
A similar tax amnesty program in 2010 brought in nearly $332 million for the state, exceeding the $250 million then-Gov. Pat Quinn’s administration anticipated.
The Revenue Department is mailing notifications to eligible taxpayers. More information on the amnesty program is available at tax.illinois.gov.
7 Comments
|
*** UPDATED x2 *** Fear and loathing in Itasca
Tuesday, Sep 17, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Kristen McQueary is absolutely right. Don’t let the NIMBYs win…
In the grip of a national opioid crisis that has been destroying families and driving up the cost of health care, controversy over an addiction facility is unfolding in west suburban Itasca.
Residents of the 8,600-plus village are aggressively fighting a proposal to allow a drug treatment center to open in an up-for-sale Holiday Inn. The hotel is confined within a business park off Interstate 290, away from residences. Introduced by Haymarket Center, which is headquartered in Chicago’s West Loop, the facility would provide in-patient treatment for drug addiction aimed at suburban residents on Medicaid.
Opposition in Itasca has been pronounced. But the “No Haymarket” signs poking from lawns around town are symbols of fear, not fact. Residents worry the facility will damage their community. The reality is, the opioid epidemic already has. […]
Rosecrance, another in-patient drug treatment facility network, faced similar backlash when it opened a location in Lakeview, one of Chicago’s more upscale neighborhoods, in 2016. Residents resisted fiercely. But the treatment center opened anyway, and the bulk of complaints since then have been about cigarette smoking near the building. That’s it.
It sometimes feels like fear and loathing is our national pastime.
*** UPDATE 1 *** From Rep. Deb Conroy (D-Villa Park)…
Thank you for your support of Haymarket in Itasca. It is time that state and local leaders come together to support this desperately needed facility and the location in Itasca. Between state and county officials we can come together to help address the loss of tax revenue. This will take away the opposition and leave only the hate. We can not let hate win when we have so many people dying from the disease of addiction. Addiction is a disease, not a crime and it does not discriminate.
*** UPDATE 2 *** Rep. Pappas disagrees…
Below is my letter to the editor regarding the proposed Haymarket facility in Itasca. Please know that space is limited…
Posted by State Representative Diane Pappas on Tuesday, July 30, 2019
44 Comments
|
Looking on the bright side
Tuesday, Sep 17, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller
* “How do you say no to jobs?”…
With a little over 100 days until recreational marijuana becomes legal in Illinois, Oglesby licensed cannabis grower is expanding and adding new jobs.
Monday, Oglesby Mayor Dom Rivara announced that Green Thumb Industries plans to launch a $1.5 million expansion of its operations in the next 30 days. Rivara termed it “an elaborate kind of operation” that, once completed, would create 40-50 jobs.
Rivara said he has “mixed emotions” about legalization — Oglesby, he said, would not modify its drug testing policy for city employees — but not at all conflicted about the economic development opportunity at hand.
“How do you say no to jobs?” Rivara said.
* Moving north…
City Manager Bill Nicklas said the city is already being approached by interested parties looking to set up a marijuana shop in DeKalb, as city staff and the council move forward to set policy for allowing dispensaries on Jan. 1.
“In the last month and a half, we’ve had four or five different entities,” Nicklas said Friday. “So I think once we can define the standards and parameters, we’ll have people approaching us for formal consideration.”
The City Council has already expressed strong support for recreational marijuana dispensaries in DeKalb, with a desire to impose a full 3% tax on sales. On Monday, the council will consider revisions to medical cannabis dispensary regulations, and begin developing a framework for local zoning and permits in the hopes that, come Jan. 1, sellers will begin eyeing DeKalb as a spot to set up shop.
* Just north of DeKalb…
The Sycamore City Council is going to wait to hear public input before it makes any decisions, but several council members seemed favorable to the idea of allowing recreational marijuana sales in the city.
At Monday’s meeting, members compared sales of recreational marijuana to previous decisions the council has made on video gambling or alcohol sales in the city. First Ward Alderman Alan Bauer said that he had voted against many of those measures in town.
“What I’ve seen over those votes is we’ve properly regulated those things,” Bauer said. “Even though I was pretty pessimistic, it turned out OK. I guess I’m OK with this.” […]
Sycamore City Manager Brian Gregory told the City Council Monday that there were several taxes that would benefit the city.
* Common sense prevailed in Riverside…
“I read all of these horrible things that are going to happen, without a shred of evidence,” [Village President Ben Sells] said. “If you want to say it’s against my values, I personally don’t want it here, absolutely. But don’t try to bootstrap that into some kind of quasi-scientific argument that there’s support for, because there isn’t.”
* The proprietors of legalized and regulated adult use cannabis dispensaries will not interrupt your shopping experience by trying to rob you at gunpoint…
A woman was attacked early Monday morning and robbed at gunpoint by two men with whom she was discussing buying drugs, police said.
The 59-year-old woman was beaten and her cash was stolen shortly after 12:30 a.m. in the 500 block of Cherry Street, according to police. She was taken to a Rockford hospital for treatment of minor injuries. Police spokeswoman Christie Castillo said one of the men was armed with a gun. The amount of money stolen was not released.
* And this is only a “glitch” if you think the state shouldn’t phase-in local taxes…
A drafting error in the law legalizing recreational marijuana in Illinois starting in January may mean counties and towns have to wait an extra nine months before gathering their share of potential revenue bonanza.
The delay has been attributed to a drafting glitch in the municipal cannabis retailers’ occupation tax (MCROT) that will prevent municipalities from collecting taxes until Sept. 1, 2020. MCROT was a prominent feature of H.B. 1438, which made Illinois the 11th state to legalize recreational marijuana.
Even so, a change is probably coming during veto session.
…Adding… Crain’s…
As Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s administration makes its first moves into regulating the recreational marijuana industry, it is releasing guidelines on where the new businesses can locate—and they’re all outside the city’s central business district.
The state will grant as many as 91 licenses to Chicago sellers, which will be divided among seven zones in the city. Initially, no zone will be allowed to have more than seven locations. Eventually, that number will climb to 14. […]
The central business district exclusion area will include Oak Street to the north, Lake Michigan to the east and Ida B. Wells Drive to the south, with the western boundary being LaSalle Street in River North and the Chicago River in the Loop. Lightfoot will introduce the restrictions at tomorrow’s City Council meeting.
“The frame of this is to really focus on equity and making sure we use an equity lens as this industry grows,” Mayekar said, adding that the city’s regulations nudge market outcomes but do not force them. “I think this is a pretty nuanced regulation that takes into account the demand of the market. The real design principle here is to ensure we don’t have over-saturation in a particular zone. . . .The seven zones were created in a way that they have more or less the same population. The goal is to have equal distribution per capita of dispensaries.”
6 Comments
|
* A Bloomington Pantagraph story about a legislative breakfast this morning with the McLean County Board…
Republicans in the Legislature called for some kind of regional conditions on the minimum wage bill, but that was not included in what lawmakers approved and Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed into law in February. The rate will increase statewide to $9.25 on Jan. 1, $10 in 2020 and by a dollar each year to 2025. […]
“I hear comments … saying, ‘Please reconvene the discussion on the minimum wage and how that may be worked in, particularly for downstate,’” said state Rep. Keith Sommer of Morton during a legislative breakfast with the McLean County Board. “This issue isn’t going away.” […]
“I’ve got an 800-employee factory in my district that’s now looking to potentially move out of state. That is a huge problem,” [Sen. Chapin Rose, R-Mahomet] said. […]
“That 5 percent increase (universities) got will be very quickly eaten up by payroll cost,” Rose said. “Superintendents have told me the minimum wage increase will wipe away the entire gains that have been received under that… monumental work (of a new funding formula). For what?”
* Meanwhile…
[Illinois Petroleum Marketers Association Executive Vice President Bill Fleischli ] said there were other factors in Illinois that will make convenience stores in border communities less competitive than those in neighboring states.
“We forget to mention the minimum wage [increase],” Fleischli said. […]
“You have to pay more for your wholesale price, you have to raise it at retail, so your volume goes away and your inside sales go away and you have to pay more of your help,” Fleischli said. “It makes the border go from a five-mile border to a 50-mile border. I’ve said it before. We’ve put the small business petroleum worker under the endangered species anymore.”
111 Comments
|
* WCIA’s Mark Maxwell…
A New York hedge fund and the CEO of a well-funded conservative think tank are suing the state of Illinois to cancel $14.3 billion in bond debt, arguing that it’s unconstitutional for state lawmakers to borrow money to pay down “unspecified” old bills.
In 2017, in a maneuver to escape the state’s historic budget impasse and to avoid from plunging into junk bond status, Illinois issued $6 billion in bonds and used the cash infusion to pay down late bills that were accruing late payment interest penalties at a rate of 12 percent. The interest on those bonds is scheduled to cost Illinois taxpayers 5 percent interest. […]
Comptroller Susana Mendoza, a Democrat whose office pays the state’s bills, defended the 2017 bond sale as “a great deal for taxpayers,” and criticized the plaintiffs for “essentially trying to bankrupt the state” in order “to make a killing off of killing the state’s finances.”
* John Tillman’s response…
“It is shameful that Comptroller Mendoza is lying to the public about my role in this lawsuit. I have nothing to gain financially from this lawsuit. I do not now, nor have I ever owned any Illinois debt or related securities.
“As I’ve made clear repeatedly, my motivation is to prevent the state of Illinois from bankrupting its citizens by taking on excessive debt, including that which is unconstitutional.
“Comptroller Mendoza is skirting the real issue: The state broke the law. That hurts everyone. Politicians continue to borrow money and drive the state deeper into debt, and they hit people with higher taxes year after year. Illinois’ failing credit rating has been long in the making. This is the result of decades worth of fiscal mismanagement enabled by issuances of unconstitutional debt, as I point out in my complaint. Someone has to do something. That’s why I sued: in an attempt to stop the madness.
“Comptroller Mendoza’s office is desperately trying to trick Illinoisans into thinking this immoral and unconstitutional borrowing is for their own good. She is confused as to both this lawsuit and the finances of the state. If successful, my lawsuit would take billions of dollars in debt off the balance sheet of the state of Illinois. It would improve the state’s financial position, not drive it into financial ruin.
“It’s obvious to every Illinoisan that you shouldn’t take out a home equity loan to pay off your credit card bill. The Illinois Constitution wisely includes protections against this kind of reckless behavior. This is why I am suing the state.”
Setting aside his odd claim that the lawsuit would “improve the state’s financial position,” and the very shaky legal foundation of his suit which we’ve discussed several times already, did Mendoza actually claim that Tillman would reap personal financial rewards from the legal action?
* Maxwell helpfully sent me the Mendoza interview transcript which you can read by clicking here. She didn’t explicitly say Tillman would profit, but she did imply it. For instance…
I kept saying [in 2017], I think there’s people who are connected to Governor Rauner who stand to make a killing off of killing the state’s finances.
This lawsuit just goes to show that exactly what I was saying was right.
The fact that you would have John Tillman, who pretends to be fiscally responsible, who leads this organization called the Illinois Policy Institute — which you’d like to believe is supposed to be a non-partisan organization or a think tank that provides good recommendations and fiscal policies to the stat — their director, John Tillman, whose entire administration almost went to work for the Rauner administration right after they had that massive purge of their employees, so they were essentially running the state during the time that bond deal finally got done.
But…
It turns out that this guy in this hedge fund stands to make… a ton of money off of the states fiscal collapse.
Yet…
MM: I have not yet asked Mr. Tillman about his suit. We hope to do that. We hope to speak with him about it. But if you take him or his allies in good faith about their intentions, they say that they want to re-train the state from its propensity to borrow money in the bond market, and restrain spending. That’s their argument.
SM: It’s 100% nonsense.
MM: How do you know that?
SM: Their only argument here is that the state should go bankrupt. And why? It’s because they stand to make a ton of money in the process.
28 Comments
|
Erika Harold bows out of congressional bid
Tuesday, Sep 17, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Merry Christmas, Jason Plummer…
* Belleville News-Democrat…
So far only one Republican has formally started a campaign in the heavily GOP district: Alex Walker of Mattoon.
On the Democratic side, John W. Hursey Jr. of Collinsville, and Kevin Gaither of Charleston, who lost to Shimkus in 2018, are planning to run. […]
Madison County Board Chairman Kurt Prenzler, a Republican, also said he is looking at running for the seat. […]
Republican Madison County Board Member Chris Guy said he is considering a run for Shimkus’ seat.
The story also has several quotes from Plummer.
16 Comments
|
Pritzker slowly reemerging
Tuesday, Sep 17, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller
* After weeks of no public appearances because of his fractured leg, Gov. Pritzker appears to be slowly ramping up his schedule. Greg Hinz yesterday…
Mike Quigley probably has as safe a seat in Congress as any Illinois incumbent, but it pays to never assume anything in politics these days—not when you’re a relative moderate at a time when the political left is flexing its muscle.
The Chicago Democrat is holding a lunchtime fundraiser starring Gov. J.B. Pritzker today. Sources say the event is expected to bring in about $50,000 for Quigley’s re-election campaign. At the moment the congressman has only one re-election foe, progressive Brian Burns.
* Also yesterday…
* Today…
Daily Public Schedule: Tuesday, Sept. 17, 2019
What: Gov. Pritzker to attend the China General Chamber of Commerce – Midwest Chapter dinner.
Where: Hyatt Regency, 151 East Wacker Drive, Chicago
When: 6:30 p.m.
Note: No additional media availability.
3 Comments
|
* Fundraising appeal from Marie Newman…
We’ve had an exciting few weeks around here. I was honored to get Senator Elizabeth Warren’s endorsement last Monday, and today, I’m just as thrilled to receive an endorsement from Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Her support means a lot. She knows what it’s like to take on the establishment and D.C. insiders — and win. Rep. Ocasio-Cortez proved that you can win tough races by knocking on as many doors as possible and championing your district’s voices and values.
That’s exactly what we’re going to do right here in IL-03, and I couldn’t be more grateful that she’s on my side.
But take a step back for a second and ask yourself why these national progressive leaders are paying close attention to this race. They know, especially right now, we simply can’t afford to have Democrats in office who fail to stand up for our values.
If you agree that it’s time for the Third District to have a leader unbought by corporate special interests — someone who will take on the establishment and machine politics — then I need you with me. Will you chip in to my campaign today?
We can do this — together.
Thanks,
Marie
* Tribune…
Lipinski, who opposes abortion rights, is among the more conservative Democrats in the House and defeated Newman in a primary last cycle. Lipinski’s 3rd Congressional District covers the southwest suburbs and a piece of the city of Chicago. […]
Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders supported Newman in her 2018 primary bid. […]
By backing a primary opponent to a colleague, Ocasio-Cortez is mounting a campaign strategy that resembles her own political rise last year, when she toppled a House Democratic leader in a stunning primary challenge. It’s a flex of power for the freshman lawmaker but also one that makes colleagues wary.
* Sun-Times…
Newman campaign manager Ben Hardin told the Sun-Times Tuesday that Ocasio-Cortez and Newman talked earlier this month about congressional priorities, Newman’s platform and the potential endorsement.
For a district anchored in Chicago and the southwest suburbs, Ocasio-Cortez decided to announce her backing in the New York Times on Tuesday morning, suggesting the lawmaker was trying to maximize the national fundraising potential of her first endorsement of the cycle.
She told the Times: “Marie Newman is a textbook example of one of the ways that we could be better as a party — to come from a deep blue seat and to be championing all the issues we need to be championing.
“The fact that a deep blue seat is advocating for many parts of the Republican agenda is extremely problematic. We’re not talking about a swing state that is being forced to take tough votes.”
* NBC News…
High-profile Democratic primaries are becoming more common, thanks in part to the attention garnered by Ocasio-Cortez and others, although the New York lawmaker herself has not been as quick to support primary challenges as some expected she would.
“We are so proud that Marie Newman is the first Justice Democrat of this cycle to receive an endorsement from Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,” said Alexandra Rojas, the executive director of Justice Democrats, which has supported many of the anti-establishment primary bids. “The momentum is growing in our movement to make the Democratic Party fight for solutions as big as the problems we face and create a party of voters, not corporate donors.”
*** UPDATE *** Response…
52 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|