Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Flavored tobacco/vape ban bill set for Monday hearing
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Flavored tobacco/vape ban bill set for Monday hearing

Friday, Oct 25, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller

* WCIA TV

Lawmakers will be back at work for veto session on Monday. One of the first things they plan to look into are proposals to ban flavored e-cigarettes and tobacco products.

Several Republicans, Democrats and the governor have all voiced support behind the idea.

Owners of vaping stores from around the state came to the capitol to remind lawmakers of the devastating impact a ban would have on their business. Managers said if a flavor e-cig ban passes, they will not be able to sell more than 90 percent of the items in their stores.

While convenience stores would not be hit as hard, because they have other items to sell, leaders in their industry say a ban is not the answer to keep the products away from children.

* Greg Bishop at the Center Square

In a hearing set for Monday, lawmakers will discuss House Bill 3883, which would ban flavored products for vaping.

Dan Reinke, owner of 3D Vapor, which has shops in the Metro East area, said that will affect adults who use flavored e-cigarettes to kick tobacco.

“What we have that got into the situation that we’re in today is a black market problem and banning flavored vaping products is only going to create a worse black market problem,” Reinke said.

The proposed flavor ban won’t just impact e-cigarettes. Josh Sharp, executive vice president of the Illinois Petroleum Marketers Association and the Illinois Association of Convenience Stores, said it would also ban flavored tobacco products such as menthol. That will affect gas stations in border communities he said.

“All you’re going to do is disperse these consumers,” Sharp said. “They’re still going to get the product. So this bill doesn’t at all solved the problem that it’s intended to, or that it seeks to.”

The original bill excluded menthol, the current amended version removed the exclusion. That is creating quite a bit of controversy. The sponsor, Rep. Deb Conroy, told me today they are currently “working through” that aspect of the legislation. Without a tobacco menthol ban, she said, “we are sending people back to cigarettes” with the favored vaping ban.

* The Illinois Association of Convenience Stores claims that flavored tobacco cigarette products, including menthol, make up 38 percent of all sales. Last fiscal year, the tobacco tax on cigarettes brought in $739 million, so menthol and other flavored products brought in about $282.5 million. Other tobacco product revenues totaled $36.7 million last year, opponents say and 79 percent of those products are flavored, they claim, for a total of $28.9 million. Vaping brought in $13 million last year. 82 percent of that is supposedly flavored, so that’s $10.7 million for a grand total of about $322 million.

Now, all menthol smokers and flavored vapers are not gonna go total cold turkey. Nor will all of them head out of state or to the black market. Many will start smoking regular cigarettes or tobacco flavored vapes. All of that state revenue will not disappear, but a chunk of it will.

About $160 million a year is expected from new taxes on cigarettes and e-cigs to fund the state’s vertical infrastructure program. Using the same formula from above, that works out to about $65 million in revenue from favored products. Again, all that revenue won’t disappear, but some will.

* Whenever a government completely completely bans something addictive or habit-forming or, in the case of cannabis, pleasurable, it risks creating or enlarging an underground market. And those markets are often run by not so nice people. Just sayin…

       

18 Comments
  1. - copenhagen - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 11:04 am:

    I’d be very curious to see the potential impact on the smokeless tobacco market. The brand in my nickname is the only one I’m aware of that doesn’t rely primarily on flavored varieties.


  2. - Phenomynous - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 11:05 am:

    Ignorant legislators with the wrong remedy to the outrage du jour…what could go wrong?


  3. - Techie - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 11:13 am:

    Such a bad idea to ban flavored tobacco and the flavorings in e-cigs.

    Do these legislators not realize that these sudden health problems are almost exclusively, if not completely, the result of black market THC cartridges that have bad stuff in them? And that by making something illegal, they’re just going to create a different black market which could see similar problems of poor quality due to lack of regulation?

    It’s hard to watch otherwise decent politicians, including the governor, support such bad measures. Please don’t do this, you might think you’re helping people, but you will be hurting much more than you’re helping.


  4. - Just Observing - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 11:19 am:

    These legislators have lost all common sense. I’m not saying vaping is healthy, but the recent health crisis seems to be largely or entirely centered on black market THC products. So… what response do legislators have?? Go after the non-problem products that have helped countless people get off cigarettes which many, many leading health experts believe are upwards of 95 percent less bad for you. This is absurd.


  5. - anon2 - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 11:21 am:

    The flavorings in e-cigs are especially attractive to youngsters. Not that many adults opt for bubblegum flavor.

    An alternative to a ban would be strict enforcement of the minimum sales age. This means regular undercover sting operations, which is what it took to get the drinking age taken seriously.


  6. - Roman - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 11:24 am:

    The bill is well intentioned, but everything about it runs completely contrary to the philosophy behind what the state just did in legalizing recreational cannabis use.

    I thought “legalize and regulate” was the way to go, but we’re going back to prohibition on vaping and menthol cigs? Flavored vapes are bad and need to be illegal because they draw teen use, but cannabis infused gummies and chocolates won’t entice teens to get high?


  7. - DarkDante - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 11:45 am:

    With talk of both the vape ban and redoing the formula for a Chicago casino, it appears that there is significant pressure being put on the funding sources for the vertical capital plan. I wonder if JB’s team is actively looking at projections for this.


  8. - DarkDante - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 11:47 am:

    ==Not that many adults opt for bubblegum flavor==

    He’s right. I know many adult vapers, and they tend to prefer cereal and baked goods based flavors, not bubble gum. /snark (but also very true, these flavored vape products appeal as much to adults as kids, in my anecdotal experience).


  9. - TheGoodLieutenant - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 11:48 am:

    Hmm.. let’s pass some legislation to make us feel like we are doing something good. If we can save just one life… blah, blah…

    As others have stated, the only common denominator in these vaping illnesses is that they are linked to unregulated black market products. Banning legitimate products will do what exactly?


  10. - smaller but not healthier - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 11:59 am:

    Anybody else remember “Bidi” cigarettes? These were also pitched at youth, they were based I think on a style of cig popular in India; they were smaller than normal size coffin nails, with fruity flavors. The vape thing reminds me that Illinois stamped those out when it became apparent highschoolers were getting into them.


  11. - Kane County Frank - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 12:20 pm:

    This ban on traditional menthol cigarettes proves it’s not about the vaping illnesses. This is about do-gooders trying to ban things they don’t like. And itll cost the state millions in tax revenue. Such a stupid idea


  12. - Bothanspy - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 12:32 pm:

    ===He’s right. I know many adult vapers, and they tend to prefer cereal and baked goods based flavors, not bubble gum. /snark (but also very true, these flavored vape products appeal as much to adults as kids, in my anecdotal experience).===

    The next logical conclusion would be to ban fruit flavored beer, spirits, and the like, because children like those flavors.


  13. - Lester Holt’s Mustache - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 12:35 pm:

    == Many will start smoking regular cigarettes or tobacco flavored vapes.==

    Not me, I’ll order online. Illinois nanny state dems will not be getting this slice of my tax dollars. Since the FDA announced on Sept 25 that it will not be banning these products, I’m sure that vape shops located in a less irrational state will be happy to accept my business.


  14. - BC - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 1:05 pm:

    == With talk of both the vape ban and redoing the formula for a Chicago casino, there is significant pressure being put on the funding sources for the vertical capital plan. ==

    That should be the core of Mayor Lightfoot’s argument on her casino re-write request.


  15. - Just Observing - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 1:44 pm:

    === The flavorings in e-cigs are especially attractive to youngsters. Not that many adults opt for bubblegum flavor. ===

    You have zero idea what you are talking about. Flavored vape juice is wildly popular among adults.


  16. - Collinsville Kevin - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 1:50 pm:

    Oh come on, just let the people vape.


  17. - MiddleGround - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 3:05 pm:

    There are really two competing interests here - each with a legitimate public policy/health concern:

    1. Preventing youth access to nicotine products - whether flavored or not.

    2. Preserving opportunities for adults to use alternative nicotine products in an effort to reduce adult smoking as well as a little bit of “adults should be able do adult things” policy.

    As Rich points out, a nicotine addiction isn’t usually solved through pricing or availability. More times than not it’s by way of an alternative nicotine product to cigarettes.

    The debate here seems to be an “either/or”. Either protect the kids or protect the options for adults. What hasn’t been considered is a middle ground approach.

    Many Cities including Minneapolis a few years ago as well as the State of Utah within the past few weeks have allowed flavored tobacco products to continue to be sold in age-restricted retail stores where minors can’t enter to be exposed to the products in the first place and where better opportunities for governmental oversight of age-enforcement can occur.

    This would not only seriously limit youth access to the products, but would recognize the role these alternative flavored products have for adults that want to quit smoking.

    This would allow the adult-only (actually 21+) store to remain open and serve the adult market with products we have deemed are only suitable for adult use. Of course this would need to be coupled with stringent back-end enforcement.

    In Minneapolis this didn’t eliminate the C-Stores entirely from the market. Many have built a store within a store that simply has an age restricted area much like many C-stores are now doing with their gaming areas.

    Before the entire ship sinks in favor of one policy objective, let’s try to take a moment and find a middle ground to address them both.


  18. - Shemp - Friday, Oct 25, 19 @ 4:13 pm:

    I am so glad we have learned how well bans work on desired products.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Madigan trial roundup: Solis leaves the witness stand
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Appellate court grants 35-day stay in Grayson release hearing
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller