* Press release…
Oak Park Democrat Don Harmon has the support of the Illinois Senate Democratic Caucus to be Illinois Senate President in the 102nd General Assembly.
“I am honored and humbled to have the support of my colleagues to serve as president of the Illinois Senate. We have a fantastically talented collection of Senate Democrats who are ready to make their mark, solve problems and lead Illinois through an upcoming year that will be filled with both challenges and accomplishments,” Harmon said after the vote.
Senate Democrats caucused virtually Thursday regarding the upcoming session.
The Illinois Senate Democratic caucus will have 41 members for the 102nd General Assembly, which is scheduled to begin on Jan. 13, 2021. One of the first official actions of a new General Assembly is to elect the Senate President and minority leader posts. In the Senate, the governor presides over the chamber until the Senate President is elected.
Harmon was elected Senate President earlier this year by his colleagues to serve out the remainder of the two-year leadership term previously held by Sen. John Cullerton, who retired from office at the start of 2020.
During Harmon’s first session as Senate President, the COVID-19 global pandemic forced the cancelation of much of the 2020 spring legislation session. Faced with ongoing public health concerns regarding large gatherings, the Senate embraced technology and in May adopted official rules for online hearings so the Senate’s work could continue. In the wake of George Floyd’s murder and Black Lives Matter marches, the Legislative Black Caucus under the leadership of Senate Majority Leader Kimberly A. Lightford quickly embraced the new online Senate committee process and launched a series of hearings on racial and social justice in an effort to build a legislative agenda to address systemic racism in Illinois.
Harmon, 54, was first elected to the Illinois Senate in 2002. He lives in Oak Park with his wife Teresa. They have three children. He has a BA from Knox College in Galesburg, and a law degree and MBA in economics from the University of Chicago.
Harmon is an avid guitar player and founding member of the bipartisan Boat Drink Caucus band.
Speaker Madigan is currently embroiled in a reelection battle, Senate Republican Leader Bill Brady was ousted by his caucus and House GOP Leader Jim Durkin defeated a challenge. Harmon won his chamber’s top job a year ago after a bitter battle, but he had an easy ride to a full term.
…Adding… Politico…
He also gave Lightford the reins to manage much of the online Senate committee process, including hearings on racial and social justice issues.
On Thursday, she nominated Harmon to keep the Senate gavel, a sign of his ability to unite the caucus.
14 Comments  
|
* CBS 2…
Hundreds of people crowded into a hotel ballroom on Wednesday, toasting newlyweds.
But in the middle of a pandemic, how is that allowed? That is what we wanted to know, too. So CBS 2’s Charlie De Mar headed to the Hilton Chicago/Northbrook to find out.
The wedding at the hotel could be described as a potential COVID-19 super-spreader event, and on the same day Illinois hit the grim milestone of 238 deaths in one day – the most since the start of the pandemic. The national death toll was also a record for a single day.
The bride walked into a room filled with hundreds on her special day. All eyes were on her, and no masks were on to block the smiles.
At the Northbrook Hilton, where they promise a cleaner stay in the age of COVID, we saw no social distancing at the wedding – and the groups of people walking about without masks. Only a sparing number of people covered up.
* From the Illinois Hotel & Lodging Association…
“The large gathering that was allowed to take place at the Hilton Chicago/Northbrook is unacceptable and does not reflect the careful efforts the hotel industry as a whole has taken since the onset of the pandemic to protect guests, employees and our communities. When I found out about this situation, I subsequently contacted public health officials to determine the appropriate next steps and reminded hotel management that they must abide by the Tier 3 mitigations and safety protocols to ensure the health of their employees and guests. In addition, we have reached out to our hotel membership across the state to once again stress the importance of abiding by all health and safety guidelines. The hotel industry is committed to working with policy makers and public health officials to ensure this situation is not repeated,” said Michael Jacobson, president & CEO, Illinois Hotel & Lodging Association.
* Tribune…
Dr. Rachel Rubin, senior medical officer and co-lead for the Cook County Department of Public Health said during a news conference Thursday that she felt “profound dismay” after hearing about the wedding.
“This event should not have happened,” she said. “It’s put a lot of individuals in danger.”
County officials said they are now investigating. According to the health department, violations of the state order banning indoor dining and other indoor congregations such as this could lead to arrest, a fine of $1,000 per offense and further actions.
* Gov. Pritzker was asked about it today…
Well first of all, I’m deeply concerned for the people who attended that wedding. I understand that people were in very close proximity to one another. I understand that those people will go home, or back into their communities and may in fact have infected other people.
And this is very concerning to all of us at a moment when we have rampant COVID-19 throughout Illinois community spread. Here we have people, who are in a concentrated fashion, have the ability now to go spread it to everywhere that they return to so I’m deeply worried for them and for the communities that they return to for their families and so on. I hope that each of them will isolate and get a test.
Now, as far as what should happen, what we’ve done, we contacted the Cook County Health Department and other authorities in Cook County as well as the city of Chicago. And we’ve made sure that they’re following up on this. It is their local enforcement that is very important to us and they are indeed doing just that I saw in the latest news story that Cook County is now following up with potential legal action law enforcement action. So we’ll have to see what follows here, but I certainly want to encourage them to do that. We’ve put in place the rules and regulations for them to follow to follow up on this.
It’s very irresponsible and it’s also irresponsible of the hotel to host an event like that. They too have breached the rules, and they should be held responsible.
* Meanwhile…
Monday, December 14, 2020 at 7 PM EST
Thelma Keller Convention Center
Public · Hosted by Darren Bailey for State Senate 55th District
Join us for a Christmas Party Fundraiser on December 14th at the Thelma Keller Convention Center in Effingham.
We’ll have Christmas Deserts, a Hot Chocolate & Coffee Bar, Bingo, and even SANTA will be there! 🎅 Join us for an evening of fun and support our efforts to #RestoreIllinois!
Tickets are $25 for individuals or $50 for a Family Ticket! LIMITED TICKETS available, so don’t wait until the last minute!
Get your tickets at: [redacted]
Sponsorships are also available at the following levels: $2500 - $1000 - $500 - $250
*** UPDATE *** From the Hilton Chicago/Northbrook…
“Last evening, the Hilton Chicago/Northbrook hosted a family wedding with approximately 150 people in attendance. While the event was booked prior to the implementation of the state’s latest mitigation measures, we sincerely regret allowing this gathering to proceed and our family apologizes to our guests, employees, and the Chicagoland community.
The coronavirus pandemic has created unprecedented challenges for the hospitality industry and our family-owned business. However, our hope to keep the hotel afloat and employees working should not outweigh health and safety.
We are committed to working with state and local health authorities to ensure our hotel is abiding by all safety measures and mitigation guidelines. We immediately reviewed our bookings to ensure any business that is inconsistent with the state’s guidelines are not held at this property, and we are committed to following contact tracing and testing protocols recommended by health officials.
It will take time, but we hope to rebuild the trust of our guests, staff and community have placed in us for so many years,” said Holly Allgauer-Cir, General Manager, Hilton Chicago/Northbrook.
32 Comments
|
Question of the day
Thursday, Dec 3, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller
* What’s your favorite charity and why?
And while you’re mulling that over, please click here and donate to Lutheran Social Services of Illinois. As I write this, we’re almost at $10,000 after about 24 hours. That’s great, but I know we can do just a bit better. Thanks!
33 Comments
|
* Rep. Darren Bailey (R-Xenia) on Facebook this morning…
Here in Illinois, friends, this whole situation with this illegal voting, this voter fraud, friends, it’s real. Its very real. I am really encouraged because there are several Republicans who have run and were narrowly defeated up in the, I’ll call it the Chicagoland area, the northern part of the state, who are going to be calling for some recounts. This is good. I’m glad to hear this, they’ve found proof that has taken this many days, that they believe that something is off, something is wrong, so you’re going to be reading about that.
This all in the midst of the very same time we’ve got many Illinois Republican leaders throughout the state calling for Donald Trump to step down, calling for him to give up. That’s appalling. Adam Kinzinger, the US Congressman from the northern part of the state, seems to be leading this charge. Last night, he tweeted that Donald Trump should delete his Twitter account and he’s been calling for quite some time for Donald Trump to just give up, concede, and get out of the way. This man has never been a fan of the president. This man has been part of the problem with Illinois politics. So keep that name in mind, don’t forget that. Get on his Twitter and Facebook accounts and tell him to get his priorities straight if he’s a Republican, otherwise change his party. There’s several others that are joining this as well and we shouldn’t put up with this. If we want a healthy Illinois, if we want a healthy conservative movement, we’ve got to get real and we’ve got to get involved.
Recounts? Right. OK.
Anyway, on to Congressman Adam Kinzinger, who is widely rumored to be eyeing a 2022 run for governor. Bailey, you will recall, said months ago that he was thinking about a gubernatorial bid.
* Kinzinger appears to be trying to protect his right flank with an attack on Gov. Pritzker over the administration’s horrible response to the preventable disaster at the LaSalle Veterans’ Home. From a WCMY radio interview today…
Kinzinger: The federal government, the US Department of Veterans Affairs, came in, did an assessment, found a whole number of things wrong. And then from that point on began offering daily help to the LaSalle Veterans Home into the state of Illinois and was denied all November, basically. Every day they would call and ask ‘Do you want federal government help?’”
That comes with money. We passed $150 million in the CARES Act for this kind of situation. And the state of Illinois kept saying ‘No’ and I want to look at the… Okay, you have things like hand sanitizer that doesn’t kill COVID because it has no alcohol in it. Okay, well that’s just a dumb clerical error or was that somebody to attempt to save money at the cost of the veterans?
And then you look at things like how come you would not take federal government support? And while I don’t want to level this accusation, I do think it’s kind of interesting that in the middle of the federal government offering help to the state of Illinois, you have the situation where the governor would constantly talk about how the federal government’s failing because we’re in the middle of an election.
So I think there’s a lot of questions that you’ve answered and that starts with the governor. This is on the governor to explain, or fire or hold accountable those responsible, if it’s not him.
Q: When somebody from Washington called, who said ‘No’?
Kinzinger: Well, you know, it’s basically every day at the veterans’ home, at the state of Illinois, they said ‘No.’ And I think that’s part of the question. Who’s not just saying ‘No,’ who’s making the decision that we won’t take federal government help?
Look, you can think that you have it under control, and you can think that maybe somehow you know more than the federal government, but let’s keep in mind the resources, the federal government comes. Anytime you get an extra set of eyes or ears, or in the federal government’s case, you have 50 other states or 49 other states and territories basically under your jurisdiction where you can see, and have examples of what worked and what didn’t. So why that happened for a month, I have no clue.
And the problem is the governor has decided to do an IG investigation, which is going to take six months, Jay. We’re not going to get any answers before that. We need answers now. And like I said, the one thing that really concerns me is the eagerness that Governor Pritzker was the entire time of the election to take on President Trump on COVID and everything else. And I hope that certainly didn’t come into play, but we need to know.
I followed up with Kinzinger’s office a few hours ago to ask who in the federal government was calling the veterans’ home and have not yet heard back.
* From Jordan Abudayyeh at the governor’s office…
It is unclear what federal help Congressman Kinzinger is referring to. At the beginning of November, as the first positive cases were discovered at the LaSalle Veterans Home, the Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs (IDVA) was in regular communication with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (USVA).
In fact, on November 5, USVA asked if the home needed assistance with PPE and the home administrator asked for additional N95 masks. USVA provided thousands of masks to be used at LaSalle and other veterans homes.
On November 9, USVA asked IDVA if they would like to have an infection control consultation and IDVA responded yes. IDVA also asked for IDPH to conduct an onsite consultation as well. Both of those visits were completed just three days later, the recommendations were implemented and the reports were made public.
After the site visit, USVA offered to make infection control experts available for further assistance and IDVA has requested that assistance. Dr. Amelia Bumstead with USVA is spending four to six weeks visiting all state veterans homes to improve infection control protocols and practices.
Throughout this process both IDVA and USVA have continued their communication and the IDVA appreciates the help and support offered by their federal partners. An independent investigation is also currently underway, and as the Governor has said, if that investigation uncovers malfeasance, appropriate disciplinary action will be taken.
*** UPDATE 1 *** Maura Gillespie at Kinzinger’s office…
The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs was offering assistance to the LaSalle Veterans’ Home, operated by the State of Illinois, to send infection control experts to assist. Our staff was briefed on that, as was Sue Rezin, on November 19th during a phone call with the VISN Network Director who confirmed that the USVA had been checking in daily to see if the State needed help. They were not taken up on their offer until the State finally requested that help at the end of November.
Well, somebody isn’t telling the truth. Stay tuned.
*** UPDATE 2 *** Back to Jordan…
As soon as the offer was presented by USVA to IDVA on November 19, IDVA said that day they were interested in additional help and began discussions regarding the scope of work and began the process to formalize the request for an intergovernmental agreement. Conversations between the USVA and IDPH doctors took place as the intergovernmental agreement was put together and was formally submitted to USVA on November 27.
33 Comments
|
Lightfoot piles on Madigan
Thursday, Dec 3, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot was asked her thoughts on Speaker Madigan today. From Fran Spielman’s report…
“Our democracy depends upon the people believing … that the leaders stand for them. That we are working hard every single day on behalf of the people and not on behalf of ourselves. That is the only way that our democracy will survive and flourish — if people have confidence in the people they elected to do the right thing for them,” the mayor said.
“That doesn’t happen when there is a cloud that hangs. That doesn’t happen when people feel like elected officials have been completely compromised and have an agenda that has nothing to do with doing the peoples’ business. That’s the wrong direction for any of us.”
Lightfoot said it’s hard to be an elected official and a leader during the best of times. It’s particularly difficult now “when we’re dealing with crisis after crisis after crisis.”
“We can’t do that if you don’t have legitimacy of the people that elected you in the first place. That’s not just a statement about Mike Madigan. That’s a statement about all of us,” she said. […]
She has also “watched with great interest the number of people who’ve been silent” and “haven’t stood up” against Madigan.
There’s more, so go read the rest.
22 Comments
|
* Potential candidates were asked to contact Rep. Camille Lilly, the ILBC House Chair, with any questions…
Thoughts?
86 Comments
|
* Press release…
The Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) today reported 10,959 new confirmed and probable cases of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Illinois, including 192 additional deaths. Some data reported to IDPH is delayed from the weekends, including this past holiday weekend.
- Adams County: 1 male 70s
- Bond County: 1 female 70s
- Bureau County: 1 male 60, 2 females 80s, 1 male 80s, 1 female 90s, 1 male 90s
- Carroll County: 1 male 70s, 1 male 80s
- Clinton County: 1 female 80s
- Coles County: 1 male 70s
- Cook County: 1 male 20s, 2 males 30s, 1 male 40s, 1 female 50s, 1 male 50s, 2 females 60s, 1 male 60s, 10 females 70s, 5 males 70s, 3 females 80s, 2 males 80s, 11 females 90s, 2 males 90, 2 females over 100, 2 males over 100
- Cumberland County: 1 male 60s
- DeKalb County: 1 female 70s
- Douglas County: 1 female 90s, 1 male 90s
- DuPage County: 4 females 70s, 2 males 70s, 2 females 80s, 3 males 80s, 3 females 90s, 1 male 90s
- Effingham County: 1 male 70s, 1 male 80s, 1 female 90s, 1 female over 100
- Fayette County: 1 male 50s
- Fulton County: 1 male 80s
- Hancock County: 1 male 80s
- Henry County: 1 male 60s, 2 males 70s
- Iroquois County: 1 female 70s, 1 male 80s, 1 female 90s, 1 male 90s
- Johnson County: 1 female 70s
- Kane County: 1 female 60s, 3 males 70s, 1 male 80s
- Kankakee County: 1 female 60s, 1 male 70s, 1 female 80s, 1 female 90s
- Kendall County: 1 female 80s
- Knox County: 1 female 90s
- Lake County: 1 female 40s, 1 female 80s, 3 males 80s
- Lawrence County: 1 female 80s
- Lee County: 1 male 80s
- Livingston County: 1 female 80s
- Logan County: 1 female 70s, 1 female 80s, 1 male 80s, 1 female 90s
- Macon County: 1 male 80s
- Macoupin County: 1 female 80s, 1 female 90s
- Madison County: 1 male 50s, 3 males 70s, 1 female 80s
- Marion County: 1 male 30s, 1 male 70s, 1 male 80s
- Mason County: 1 female 80s
- Massac County: 1 female 90s
- McHenry County: 1 female 80s
- Morgan County: 1 male 40s, 3 males 70s, 1 female 90s, 2 males 90s
- Ogle County: 1 male 70s, 1 female 80s
- Peoria County: 1 female 60s, 1 male 80s
- Perry County: 1 female 60s, 1 female 80s
- Pike County: 1 male 60s
- Rock Island County: 1 female 50s, 1 male 70s, 2 males 80s
- Saline County: 1 male 60s
- Sangamon County: 1 male 70s, 1 female 80s
- St. Clair County: 2 males 60s, 2 males 80s
- Stark County: 1 male 70s
- Tazewell County: 1 female 50s, 1 male 50s, 1 male 80s, 1 male 90s
- Vermilion County: 1 male 60s, 1 male 70s, 1 female 90s
- Whiteside County: 1 female 60s, 2 males 60s, 1 female 70s, 1 female 80s, 1 male 80s, 1 male 90s
- Will County: 1 female 60s, 2 males 60s, 2 males 70s, 1 male 80s, 2 females 90s, 2 males 90s, 1 female over 100
- Williamson County: 1 male 70s, 3 females 80s, 1 female 90s
- Winnebago County: 2 males 50s, 2 females 70s, 2 males 70s, 1 male 80s
Currently, IDPH is reporting a total of 759,562 cases, including 12,830 deaths, in 102 counties in Illinois. The age of cases ranges from younger than one to older than 100 years. Within the past 24 hours, laboratories have reported 106,778 specimens for a total 10,806,364. As of last night, 5,653 in Illinois were reported to be in the hospital with COVID-19. Of those, 1,170 patients were in the ICU and 693 patients with COVID-19 were on ventilators.
The preliminary seven-day statewide positivity for cases as a percent of total test from November 26 – December 2, 2020 is 10.4%. The preliminary seven-day statewide test positivity from November 26 – December 2, 2020 is 12.3%.
*All data are provisional and will change. In order to rapidly report COVID-19 information to the public, data are being reported in real-time. Information is constantly being entered into an electronic system and the number of cases and deaths can change as additional information is gathered. Information for deaths previously reported has changed, therefore, today’s numbers have been adjusted. For health questions about COVID-19, call the hotline at 1-800-889-3931 or email dph.sick@illinois.gov.
17 Comments
|
* From Jeff Wilhite at the Sangamon County Department of Public Health…
Rich,
If you’re interested, below are details from the recent public health related court hearing in Sangamon County.
A lawsuit filed by a Thayer bar against the Sangamon County Department of Public Health on November 25th was thrown out Wednesday afternoon. Represented by Attorney Thomas DeVore, Brewzrz Pub claimed that the Public Health Department violated Illinois law by suspending its food license on November 19, 2020 as a result of the bar’s failure to comply with Sangamon County’s Covid-19 mitigation restrictions prohibiting indoor dining and bar service. The bar asked the Court to order the County to reinstate its suspended food service license. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Sangamon County State’s Attorney, Dan Wright, characterized the arguments in the suit against the County as “devoid of merit” and amounted to “analytical snake oil in the midst of a deadly global pandemic which continues to surge in Sangamon County.” In dismissing the case, Sangamon County Judge Gail Noll found that the suit failed to state a valid claim under Illinois law and did not establish a likelihood of success on the merits.
Excerpts from the Motion to Dismiss from State’s Attorney Dan Wright
Plaintiff’s arguments are devoid of merit and amount to analytical “snake oil” in the midst of a deadly global pandemic which continues to surge in Sangamon County. The Court should reject Plaintiff’s erroneous arguments, deny the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and dismiss the Complaint with prejudice.
Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies under the plain language of Section 5.20.080 (Suspension of Permits) which requires a petition to the Sangamon County Board of Health to “request a hearing for abatement of the order” which suspended Plaintiff’s food permit. See Sangamon County Code, Section 5.20.080. Plaintiff did not file a petition to request a hearing before the Board of Health. Moreover, Plaintiff has failed to “make application for a reinspection for the purpose of reinstatement of the permit” under Section 5.20.090 (Reinstatement of Permits).
Section 2 of the Department of Public Health Act provides the procedures that the Department must adhere to when “a person or group of persons [is] to be quarantined or isolated” or it orders that “a place [must] be closed and made off limits to the public to prevent the probable spread of a dangerously contagious or infectious disease.” 20 ILCS 2305/2(b-c) (emphasis added). Specifically, Section 2 requires that:
… [N]o person or a group of persons may be ordered to be quarantined or isolated and no place may be ordered to be closed and made off limits to the public except with the consent of the person or owner of the place or upon the prior order of a court of competent jurisdiction. Id.
Contrary to the repeated, unsupported, and conclusory allegations of the Complaint, neither the November 10 Notice nor the November 19 license suspension purport to require Plaintiff’s business to be “closed and made off limits to the public” for any and all purposes as required to trigger the procedural and substantive requirements of 20 ILCS 2305/2. Plaintiff’s bald assertions that the actions of Defendants “made [Plaintiff’s premises] off limits to the public” are unsupported by any allegations of specific facts. Complaint, ¶¶ 8-9, 11, 16, 19-20, 23-24, 26-27, 29, 31, 34, 36. Plaintiff simply invites the Court to join it in making the misguided analytical leap that suspension of a food license pursuant to the Sangamon County Code somehow equates to a closure order under the Public Health Act.
The November 10 Notice merely notified food service license holders of conditions found to constitute a “substantial immediate hazard to the public health” under Section 5.20.080 of the Sangamon County Code, e.g. indoor dining. The November 10 Notice did not, in any manner, make the premises off limits to the public for any other food service purposes such as outdoor dining, carry-out, or curbside service. The November 19 Notice of Violation attached to the Complaint as Exhibit “B” which suspended Plaintiff’s food service license merely prohibits food service without a valid license (“Permit suspended at time of inspection and all food service operations are to be immediately discontinued.”). It did not order the physical closure of the premises and make them off limits to the public for any and all purposes as would a “closure order” under the Public Health Act. Any complete closure of the premises was voluntary as a matter of law and not compelled by actions of Defendants.
For example, Defendants do not have jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s local liquor license which is subject to the authority of the Illinois Liquor Control Commission and the Liquor Commissioner for the Village of Thayer. Put simply, unlike a closure order under the Public Health Act, Defendants’ suspension of Plaintiff’s food service license did not make the premises off limits to the public or prohibit any lawful use of the premises other than unlicensed food service.
While Defendants’ actions were not premised upon any gubernatorial executive order, the Appellate Court recently held that Governor JB Pritzker’s Executive Order No. 2020-61 did not implicate “section 2(c) [of the Public Health Act] because its measures were not tantamount to quarantine orders, isolation orders, or business-closure orders. Instead [the Governor’s Executive Order] prescribed guidelines that restaurants must follow to safely operate while a region’s [COVID-19] positivity rates exceed state guidelines.” Fox Fire Tavern, LLC v. Pritzker, 2020 IL App. (2d) 200623, ¶41 (emphasis added) (citing Cassell v. Snyders, 458 F. Supp. 3d 981, 1002 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (holding that restrictions on large gatherings do not amount to orders of quarantine, isolation, or business closure)).
In Cassell, the Court succinctly articulated the threshold issue in the current case, stating:
Plaintiffs invoke Illinois’s Department of Health Act, 20 Ill. Comp. Stat. 2305/2(a). Under that Act, the “State Department of Public Health [or local public health authority]… has supreme authority in matters of quarantine and isolation.” Id. § 2305/2(a). Before exercising its authority to “quarantine,” “isolate,” and make places “off limits [to] the public,” however, the Department must comply with certain procedural requirements. Id. § 2305/2(c). As Plaintiffs see it, the Act vests the Department with the exclusive authority to quarantine and isolate Illinoisans, making Governor Pritzker’s orders ultra vires. The problem for Plaintiffs is that the challenged Order does not impose restrictions that fall within the meaning of the Act.
Just as in FoxFire and Cassell, the Defendants’ actions in the current matter “were not tantamount to quarantine orders, isolation orders, or business-closure orders” and did “not impose restrictions that fall within the meaning of the Act.” Id. Plaintiff cannot escape the reality that no action by O’Neill or the Department made its premises entirely “off limits to the public” for any and all purposes as necessary to apply the requirements of Section 2 of the Public Health Act. The Complaint contains insufficient facts to permit the Court to reach any other conclusion. Indeed, Plaintiff cannot ethically allege any set of facts that would permit the Court to find Defendants’ actions imposed restrictions that fall within the meaning of Section 2 of the Public Health Act. Id. Accordingly, the Complaint must be dismissed pursuant to Section 2-615.
Plaintiff ignores the legal reality that review of acts of administrative discretion, such as the November 10 Notice and November 19 license suspension under Section 5.20.080, is highly deferential. Bigelow Group, Inc. v. Rickert, 377 Ill. App. 3d 165, 174 (2d Dist. 2007). “The ‘arbitrary or capricious’ standard must be applied in light of the limited purview prescribed the judiciary by the separation of powers doctrine—the judiciary must limit itself to infringing on official discretion only where that discretion can be shown to have violated the law.” Id. at 174. Put another way, “arbitrary and capricious” review is a “single inquiry into the legality of the official decision.” Id. It is “the most deferential standard of review—next to no review at all.”
The November 10 Notice was lawfully issued as a finding of the Board of Health through its authorized representative in response to a public health emergency. Defendants’ actions were undertaken in direct reliance upon the expert recommendations of the BOH Physicians Advisory Group and in compliance with pre-existing Sangamon County Code provisions governing food service establishments, i.e. Section 5.20.080. Accordingly, the Defendants’ actions were not - under any good faith interpretation - arbitrary, capricious, or ultra vires as erroneously alleged by Plaintiff.
DeVore said he’d appeal the ruling on Greg Bishop’s radio show today. He said he’d go all the way to the US Supreme Court if need be.
* Greg asked DeVore whether he’d paid the $1,000 bounty of footage of Pritzker celebrating Thanksgiving with friends and family. As you know, I posted a photo of Pritzker and his wife on a Zoom chat during Thanksgiving dinner. DeVore’s response…
Well one, I want to clarify that. The thousand dollars that I offered for footage from a journalist to take a picture of the governor should they see him out celebrating with friends and family. Friends and family being a generic term. I didn’t even know he had kids until I put that out. So he has kids, OK, I don’t care about that. But no, I didn’t pay it out because, again, you know I was looking for the governor. He’s using the word bounty, I didn’t use the word bounty. But no, I didn’t pay it out.
* DeVore was also asked about whether it was time to stop filing lawsuits since he’s losing so many of them…
If they think that any of this is going on is about winning or losing lawsuits, the people that say that need to consider if they’re as intelligent as they think they are. This isn’t about winning lawsuits. If I want to win lawsuits, Greg, and that’s the goal and not to protect people, I’ll go into the federal court. It’d be a lot easier.
You can’t protect people by losing countless lawsuits. You can only give them false hope.
…Adding… From comments…
Also, just to point out, (1) Devore fought like crazy to keep Bailey’s case out of federal court when the AG tried to remove to federal court, and (2), his only “wins” have occurred in state court.
44 Comments
|
Oops
Thursday, Dec 3, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Oh, man, did I ever screw up. Jim Nowlan didn’t chair the Fair Tax opposition committee. He chaired the other committee that spent a fortune this fall against Supreme Court Justice Tom Kilbride.
Post deleted. All apologies. I may need a nap and it’s not even noon.
As penance, I made another contribution to Lutheran Social Services of Illinois.
18 Comments
|
* From Sabato’s Crystal Ball…
* And here they are side-by-side for an easier comparison…
Don’t get hung up on the Durbin reference in comments. This isn’t really about him. It’s about how the state has changed and what the trends look like. Yes, the Democratic Party has a whole has to reverse the trend in small Downstate cities, but the statewide vote is in the city and the suburbs and the Republicans are just getting slaughtered.
You already knew that, of course, but the map is a good illustration.
* Narrative…
Durbin was first elected to the House in 1982, representing a Downstate district in between the Springfield and St. Louis areas. When another fellow Downstate Democrat, then-Sen. Paul Simon, retired from the Senate in 1996, Durbin ran for the seat, and he carried most counties south of St. Louis. As those demographically whiter and more rural counties have drifted Republican in past decades, Durbin’s coalition has increasingly become more urban and suburban.
This year, other than narrowly losing McHenry County, he carried every county that touches Chicago’s Cook; these formerly-Republican suburban counties are known collectively as the Chicago’s Collar Counties. In 1996, he lost the largest collar county, DuPage, by 10 percentage points — last month, Durbin got the same 55% there as he did statewide.
Durbin held a smattering of Downstate counties, but this seems like more a sign of his strength with white collar academics than blue collar workers — aside from St. Clair County in the St. Louis metro area, with its large Black population, every county south of Peoria that he won last month is home to a major university: Champaign (University of Illinois), McLean (Illinois State University) and Jackson (Southern Illinois University).
To be fair, Durbin did perform relatively well, compared to Biden, in the counties that made up his old congressional district. In rural counties such as Brown, Calhoun, and Macoupin, he ran double-digits ahead of the national ticket — but often, it was a case of Durbin polling in the 30s, compared to Biden, who was in the 20s.
…Adding… Tribune…
* How did your neighbors vote for president, Senate and the graduated-rate income tax amendment? Search our city and suburban map to find out.
44 Comments
|
ISP says it has cut DNA backlog nearly in half
Thursday, Dec 3, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Press release from yesterday…
Governor JB Pritzker and Illinois State Police (ISP) Director Brendan F. Kelly announced today the ISP Division of Forensic Services (DFS) achieved a 48% overall reduction in Biology/DNA pending assignments, commonly known as “the DNA backlog.” On March 1, 2019, the backlog consisted of 9,289 pending assignments. As of Nov. 30, 2020, forensic scientists worked the number of pending assignments down to 4,857.
“Since the beginning of my administration, we have prioritized implementing policies and procedures that will allow the dedicated forensics team at ISP’s Division of Forensic Services to reduce the state’s DNA backlog. Thanks to the leadership of the Forensic Science Task Force, which my administration established in 2019, additional recommendations to help further decrease the backlog are now underway,” said Governor JB Pritzker. “I am encouraged by the 48% reduction in forensic cases and will continue to support ISP’s work to bring brings victims and their loved ones a step closer to justice.”
“For more than a decade, trends in forensic labs across the country, including in Illinois, have been headed the wrong direction, but because of the hard work and discipline of the Illinois State Police we are finally headed in the right direction in Illinois,” said ISP Director Brendan F. Kelly. “Our progress is real and significant, but no one in the Illinois State Police will be satisfied until all victims can trust that the cause of justice will be advanced and not delayed by forensics.”
Remarkably, this reduction was achieved while having up to six forensic scientists from the biology/DNA section on loan for more than four months to the Illinois Department of Public Health to assist with COVID-19 testing.
Forensics outcomes across a variety of metrics have significantly improved.
• This year, the average age of pending DNA/Biology assignments has been reduced from 247 in May 2019 to 110 days in November 2020.
• The number of DNA/Biology assignments that are older than a year was 1,329 in January 2020 but had dropped to 186 in November 2020.
• The number of pending sexual assault assignments that are more than six months old has gone from 1,059 in January to 280 in November 2020.
• The DNA/Biology section is completing 22% more assignments per month this year compared with 2019.
These outcomes were achieved in part by executing a multi-prong strategy:
• The ISP DFS has deployed technology to assist in the reduction of backlogs and turnaround times, implemented laboratory accountability measures, robotics, Rapid DNA, Lean Six-Sigma efficiencies and hired and trained additional forensic scientists.
• The ISP Laboratory system implemented robotics to increase DNA casework capacity in November 2019. Robotics are now fully operational and are contributing to the backlog and turnaround time in DNA analysis.
• To improve communication, ISP DFS began issuing agency specific reports on pending assignments to enhance communication between investigating agencies, state’s attorneys’ offices and the laboratories. Agencies are asked to review their list of pending assignments and tell lab management of any cases that need immediate attention and those that no longer require analysis. For example, this process identified 1,200 felony drug cases closed with a court disposition while still showing pending assignments at the lab. As a result, lab resources were not squandered on testing these 1,200 closed cases. This communication has and will continue to improve the prioritization of casework and reduce the waste of lab resources.
• As part of the plan to reduce the number of pending assignments, the ISP DFS implemented an aggressive hiring plan and continues to work to recruit and hire scientists, as well as implementing training that is effective and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the beginning of 2019, ISP DFS has held two Forensic Science Trainee classes. Even with the difficulties navigating through the pandemic, ISP DFS has been able to keep training on track. The 2020 trainees are scheduled to complete their training between March 2021 and February 2022.
Additionally, Gov. Pritzker’s Forensic Science Task Force, chaired by ISP Director Kelly, continued to meet during the pandemic and made additional, specific recommendations that, if implemented, will sustain the momentum of reducing the backlog and improving turnaround times.
The ISP DFS will also move into a new laboratory in Decatur, occupying roughly 12,000 square feet in the first two stories of the building. The ISP DFS will utilize this as a DNA lab, initially processing evidence submitted from property crimes. The addition of this lab will allow the further reduction in turnaround times. Funding for the construction of a new forensics lab in the Joliet area was also secured under Gov. Pritzker’s bi-partisan capital bill and is moving forward under the Capital Development Board.
The ISP DFS unveiled the sexual assault kit tracking system, known as Checkpoint, before the statutory deadline. This system allows sexual assault survivors to track their evidence in real time from collection at the hospital to law enforcement pick-up and submission to the forensic lab and lastly, to the prosecutors’ office.
The ISP’s success in decreasing the forensic backlog are not limited to the Biology/DNA section.
• The latent print backlog was slashed by 35% this year and 78% since January 2019. Average turnaround time for fingerprints this year has been reduced by 62% since 2019.
• Average turnaround time for firearms evidence this year has been reduced by 44% since 2019.
• The trace chemistry section is completing 49% more assignments per month than last year.
19 Comments
|
* Rep. Andre Thapedi, the chair of the House Judiciary - Civil Committee, sent a letter today to Angela Mehlbrech, the administrator of the LaSalle Veterans’ Home…
Dear Ms. Mehlbrech:
As you may be aware, the House Judiciary - Civil Committee is embarking on a fact-based investigation into the recent outbreak of SARS-Co V-2, or COVID-19, or Coronavirus, or any comparable moniker for SARS-CoV-2 at the LaSalle Veterans’ Home in LaSalle (hereinafter ” the Facility”). As part of that investigation, please provide me with the following information relative to personal protective equipment (hereinafter “PPE”) and other things … on or before December 9, 2020:
1. Provide the name, address, email address and telephone number for each and every vendor and manufacturer providing hand sanitizer to the Facility from January 1, 2020 to the present .
2. Provide the name, address, email address and telephone number for each and every vendor and manufacturer providing PPE (i.e . gloves, masks, gowns, face shields , etc.) to the Facility from January 1, 2020 to the present.
3. Provide the name, manufacturer, country of origin and chemical composition of all hand sanitizers purchased for and utilized in the Facility from August 1, 2020 to November 30, 2020.
4. Provide the name, manufacturer, and country of origin of all PPE (i.e. gloves, masks, gowns, face shields, etc.) purchased for and utilized in the Facility from August 1, 2020 to November 30, 2020.
5. Provide any and all rules, regulations, procedures, bylaws, standards , protocols, directives and writings of whatsoever nature relative to health screening (i.e. temperature checks, lab work, testing, etc.) for employees when they arrive at the Facility and when they exit the Facility .
6. Provide any and all rules, regulations, procedures , bylaws, standards, protocols, directives and writings of whatsoever nature relative to health screening (i.e. temperature checks, lab work, testing, etc.) for non-employees when they arrive at the Facility and when they exit the Facility.
7. Provide any and all documents, records, writings, letters, correspondence, memorandum, electronic mail, information in computer storage in printed form and other writings mentioning SARS CoV-2, or COVID-19, or Coronavirus, or any comparable moniker for SARS-CoV-2 that is: (A) dated from August 1, 2020 to the present; and (B) addressed to and/or prepared by the Facility.
8. Provide any and all reports generated in calendar year 2020 following on-site visits and/or inspections at the Facility by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs which should include, but should not be limited to, the on-site visit and/or inspection on or about November 12, 2020 at the Facility.
9. Provide any and all reports generated in calendar year 2020 following on-site visits and/or inspections at the Facility by the Illinois Department of Public Health which should include, but should not be limited to, the on-site visit and/or inspection on or about November 17, 2020 at the Facility.
10. Please identify and state the location of any of the following documents related to the SARS-CoV- 2, or COVID-19, or Coronavirus, or any comparable moniker for SARS-CoV-2 outbreak which either bears the name, handwriting and/or signature of the Nursing Home Administrator of the Facility (i.e. Angela Mehlbrech): (A) publications and/or literature authored by her, including publication source and reference; and (B) correspondence, records, memoranda or other writings prepared by her regarding the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, or COVID-19, or Coronavirus, or any comparable moniker for SARS-CoV-2, and its care and treatment of residents and employees of the Facility.
11. State whether there were any policies, procedures, guidelines, rules or protocols for SARS-CoV-2, or COVID-19, or Coronavirus, or any comparable moniker for SARS-CoV-2 that were in effect at the Facility. If so, state:
a. Whether such policies, guidelines, rules or protocols are published and by whom;
b. The effective date of said policies, guidelines, rules or protocols;
c. Which medical professionals and employees are bound by said policies, guidelines, rules or protocols;
d. Who is the administrator of any such policies, procedures, guidelines, rules and/or protocols; and
e. Whether the policies, guidelines, rules or protocols in effect at the time of the SARS-CoV-2, or COVID- 19, or Coronavirus, or any comparable moniker for SARS-CoV-2 outbreak have been changed, amended, or altered since the SARS-CoV-2, or COVID-19, or Coronavirus, or any comparable moniker for SARS-CoV- 2 outbreak. If so, state the change(s) and the date(s) of any such change(s).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to email me at lllinois32district@gmail.com. Sincerely yours,
Representative Andre Thapedi
Chairman - House Judiciary - Civil Committee
31 Comments
|
* I don’t know if either person in this exchange was aware of it or not, but there’s a malicious rumor going around that Gov. Pritzker was going to put himself at the front of the line for the new COVID vaccine, whenever it’s approved and distributed. From his press conference today..
Amy Jacobson: Governor, a number of Americans are leery of a COVID vaccine and some are asking for lawmakers to get vaccinated first. Would you or Dr. Ezike be willing to do this?
Gov. Pritzker: Sure, but I wouldn’t want to jump ahead of somebody who may be more at risk than I am. But absolutely, I understand exactly the point that’s being made.
There are competing views. There’s some people who want their communities to be moved to the front of the line. And some people from those same communities would say they don’t want to take the vaccine at all. And so we’re listening to the medical ethicists, we’re listening to the epidemiologists to make sure that we’re providing the vaccine, making it available to everybody that wants to have it as fast as we humanly possibly can. And of course messaging to people will be very important.
I’m not a doctor. I didn’t review the materials that the FDA is reviewing now. I won’t be responsible for making the decisions that the FDA will make EUA for Pfizer the emergency use authorization for Moderne and others. But I do know that there are 10s of thousands of patients who are in their trials. And so the results of those very widespread trials will be important to look at to determine whether or not these vaccines are safe. I feel somewhat confident that the quality of the people who serve on the panels at the FDA is such that they would make the right kind of decision for the American people.
And here in Illinois, of course, we have a vaccine advisory team that will be reviewing that very same data right after it is released. The White House Coronavirus Task Force, I might add, had a meeting that I was, that all the governors were part of just two days ago. Andthe head of the FDA Hahn said that all of the materials will be made available to all of us to review. So I do believe that it will be safe. We’ll be able to review the data to confirm that and I hope that people will therefore get the vaccine, as they are able to see that it’s safe.
* I haven’t written much about the vaccine here because I haven’t wanted to add to all the hype, which I don’t think is all that helpful. A buddy of mine had this to say in a text exchange earlier today and I agree with much of it…
Here’s my fear. We’re talking about hundreds of thousands of people in the priority vaccination group and we’re only slotted for tens of thousands of doses initially. This is going to take time. And we haven’t even gotten to the second priority tier, which will cover millions of people and all of this relies on vaccine approval and dose deliveries that are out of the state’s control. My fear is [Pritzker] is so eager to deliver good news that he’s going to overhype this and the masses will come away thinking, it’s finally over. And then 2 things will happen. Human nature will kick in and people will drop their guard and the virus will explode … again. And people will become increasingly frustrated as the details roll out and they learn they’re not eligible for the vaccine today, or tomorrow, or the next day, or the next week or the next month.
Just wait til someone asks the question of whether we’re going to vaccinate prison inmates before restaurant workers and bartenders. (I don’t know the answer to that one, but I’m sure it’s coming). And from what I can gather, if you are a healthy, non-first responder, non-medical professional between the ages of 18 and 65 who’s healthy, you will be the very last person to get vaccinated.
And last in line might mean … July?
36 Comments
|
* From The Hill…
“The first question was, is there a clear and unwavering group that will keep Madigan from getting 60 votes,” said Rep. Bob Morgan (D), one of the 19 who has said he will not support the incumbent. “I think that question has been answered — the answer is yes.” […]
The result of a deadlocked House, observers said, could be months of chaos if Madigan refuses to concede — at a time when a global pandemic has sickened nearly three quarters of a million Illinoisans and killed more than 13,000.
“A lot of us want to pass comprehensive social equity reforms or combat climate change or support small business that’s suffering. We have a massive budget problem at the moment,” Morgan said. “And we can’t deal with that when there’s an individual who believes that his power is the most significant question in the state.”
Ouch.
* More…
The problem the recalcitrant Democrats face, though, is that no alternative candidate has yet emerged. Up to a dozen members may be considering their own bids if Madigan surrenders, and a battle over the Speakership would expose faults among a Democratic caucus divided by race, ideology and generational lines.
“There’s not yet agreement about who should replace him, or even a front-runner,” Simpson said. “It’s going to be a free-for-all because there’s no obvious person who’s declared.”
My own opinion is that if this challenge succeeds, the next House Speaker will likely not be among the 19 declared opponents. It’ll come from the 50 or so people who have pledged their support. But that can’t happen until either Madigan steps aside or until one of those 50 figures out how to put something together on the side and then present Madigan with an ultimatum.
* Meanwhile, there are a lot of rumors floating around right now, but this may be the least believable one…
The buzz quickly shifted to whether Gov. J.B. Pritzker had anything to do with her decision given Willis’ husband, Tom Willis, was appointed by the governor to serve on the state’s Labor Relations Board. He did not, said Willis in a text to Playbook: “Governor was never informed or consulted regarding my decision.”
The governor is not going to play that game yet.
…Adding… Forgot to post this from the chair of the special investigation committee…
…Adding… From Durkin’s comments…
“I’m asking him to leave the General Assembly,” said Durkin. “All roads in this massive and wide scandal lead to Speaker Madigan. Speaker Madigan under no circumstances can continue to serve.”
Two other Republicans, Reps. Tom Demmer of Dixon and Deanne Mazzochi of Elmhurst, called on Madigan to at least testify before a special House panel about his involvement with ComEd. […]
Durkin says he was not aware of what his chief of staff may have done, but that he personally has not sought jobs. Regardless, he continued: “This is not about hiring recommendations. It’s about a nine-year hiring scandal.”
Based on court documents, Durkin said he believes further indictments against other people are on the way, but he gave no specifics.
27 Comments
|
*** UPDATED x1 *** Question of the day
Wednesday, Dec 2, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller
* December is the time for two holiday traditions at the ol’ blog: 1) Fundraising for Lutheran Social Services of Illinois; and 2) our Golden Horseshoe Awards.
LSSI is such an important part of Illinois, particularly in a year like this. They run a Therapeutic Foster Care program for children with histories of severe trauma and emotional/behavioral needs. They do home care for senior citizens. They have a free mental health crisis program. They collect Christmas presents for foster kids. And so much more.
So, please, click here and donate today. I’ll match the first $1,000.
* Now, about the Golden Horseshoe Awards. Since there was basically no session this year, I’m not sure that many of our categories are even relevant (best restaurant, bars, waitstaff, legislators, lobbyists, etc.). So, what would you like to do? Which categories do you think would be most appropriate? And, remember, these awards are for achievement. We don’t waste our time on negativity. No snark allowed.
My own thoughts are that we give the best agency director award to Dr. Ezike and give a huge shoutout to all the staff who have kept everything together during these crazy times and call it a day. Your thoughts?
And while you’re mulling over your answer, please click here and donate to Lutheran Social Services of Illinois. Thanks!
*** UPDATE *** We’ve already reached $1,000 so I’ve matched it as promised (unlike Tom DeVore, I keep my donation promises). Let’s keep going!
25 Comments
|
* WBEZ…
Durkin said he is appealing to 15 “reform-minded” House Democrats to vote for him for House Speaker as more members of Madigan’s caucus gradually come forward to say they will not be voting for him to remain as speaker after January’s inauguration. He said Republicans will not be supporting a Democrat for speaker.
Leader Durkin made that comment after Michael McClain, Anne Pramaggiore, John Hooker and Jay Doherty entered “not guilty” pleas at their arraignment today.
*** UPDATE 1 *** Going about as well as I expected…
*** UPDATE 2 *** Durkin’s comments appear to have given MJM opponents something to bond with…
46 Comments
|
COVID-19 roundup
Wednesday, Dec 2, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Center Square…
The first public hearing of the Restore Illinois Collaborative Commission focused on grants of federal dollars the Pritzker administration is administering to businesses. But one aspect of the program was labeled “abuse of power” by a commission member.
Tuesday’s hearing also gave the public a glimpse of what Republicans have characterized as short and unproductive meetings.
The hearing lasted about 70 minutes with about half the time for questions from lawmakers. The other half was a presentation about federal funds being administered to businesses through the Business Interruption Grant program.
The grants for businesses are being managed by the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity. Agency officials said a third party vendor helping facilitate the application process cost around $1 million. Of $270 million available, there’s about $130 million left to distribute.
DCEO Assistant Director Michael Negron said if grant recipients don’t follow the governor’s executive orders, the grants ranging from $5,000 to $150,000 could be clawed back.
“It’s something that the state is trying to communicate that in order to get the economy on a path to recovery and in order to save lives we’ve got to get the virus under control, and that requires certain measures,” Negron said.
State Rep. Dan Caulkins, R-Decatur, said that’s “government overreach and abuse of power.”
“For you to put in your contract that these businesses have to follow executive orders with no level of certainty of what those orders might be and then face clawback, it rubs me quite wrongly,” Caulkins said.
I just have no words for that.
* Once again, the federal government is forcing states to participate in a dystopian Hunger Games scenario…
Chicago health officials yesterday announced that they expect the COVID-19 vaccine could be ready for distribution by mid-December 2020. According to ABC Chicago, the CDC is expected to formally recommend that health care workers and residents of long term health facilities are first in line for vaccines, but “it will be up to state and local officials to decide where doses go first…” The state of Illinois is expected to announce a tiered plan later this week.
In response to this news, Anthony McGee, Vice President of Teamsters Local 700, the union representing nearly 3,000 Corrections Officers at the Cook County jail, issued the following statement:
“We agree 100% that initial distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine should be determined by risk of exposure to the virus. With that in mind, Teamsters Local 700 is urging city and state leaders, including Governor Pritzker, Mayor Lightfoot and Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle, to ensure that CCDOC Corrections Officers, and all other law enforcement officers, are among the first to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.
“CCDOC Corrections Officers have heroically put their lives on the line to protect their communities since the start of the pandemic. As the virus raged throughout the Cook County jail — labeled at one point as the top COVID-19 hot spot in America — officers continued to work long hours in confined spaces, where keeping social distance is impossible, oftentimes without proper PPE or protocols in place to keep them safe. CCDOC Corrections Officers have paid a terrible price for their service: five officers have died due to COVID, and hundreds more have tested positive for COVID-19.
“Unfortunately today, many months after the COVID-19 pandemic began, the Cook County jail is still a dangerous COVID-19 hotspot. Despite knowing for months that COVID-19 would likely spike at the jail as winter approached, Sheriff Tom Dart failed to develop a comprehensive plan to protect Corrections Officers and others in the jail from the deadly virus. COVID-19 cases have now reached their highest levels at the jail since April–and officers are still reporting that the Sheriff is failing to provide them with proper PPE and forcing others to interact with inmates who have not been wearing masks.
“Given the high risk of exposure to COVID-19 that currently exists at the Cook County jail, along with the essential work Corrections Officers do every day, it is imperative that city and state officials prioritize CCDOC officers with vaccine distribution. The wellbeing of CCDOC Corrections Officers — along with their family, friends, and the public at large — depends on it.”
* Ladies and gentlemen, my alderman…
A Springfield alderman unsuccessfully sought the removal of a newspaper reporter from city council chambers Tuesday evening, arguing that the reporter was violating his social distance.
Minutes before the Springfield City Council was set to convene, Ward 1 Ald. Chuck Redpath requested that Illinois Times reporter Bruce Rushton be restricted to the space in the back of the council chambers reserved for the media.
Redpath alleged that Rushton, who typically sits in the public seating area nestled in between the horseshoe where council members sit and the press box, was getting too close to him.
Redpath typically does not wear a face mask when seated at the horseshoe, and this trend continued throughout most of Tuesday’s meeting, with his mask either completely off or around his chin.
He later told reporters that he has a medical condition exempting him from the city’s mask ordinance. But, he declined to elaborate further.
A medical condition? A good friend of mine has asthma. She has to regularly visit her doctor for steroid shots and IV treatments. She wears a mask whenever she leaves her home and has never once complained.
* Speaking of masks…
The Naperville City Council affirmed that everyone who is medically able should wear a protective face covering in public to prevent the spread of COVID-19, but stopped short of mandating masks.
After hearing two hours of comments Tuesday from nearly 150 people, many of whom oppose wearing masks or governmental interference in their decision to cover their face, the council opted to take a positive approach rather than a punitive one.
The council initially voted 5-4 against an ordinance requiring people to mask up in Naperville anytime a 6-foot distance cannot be maintained.
Mayor Steve Chirico and council members Kevin Coyne, Patty Gustin, Paul Hinterlong and John Krummen opposed the mandate; council members Judy Brodhead, Patrick Kelly, Theresa Sullivan and Benny White voted in favor of it.
* Sun-Times live blog headlines…
Officials announced Chicago and Illinois will receive its first doses of COVID-19 vaccines later this month
Starbucks offering free coffee to health care workers, first responders
Who will get the first doses of the COVID-19 vaccine in Chicago?
Anthony Fauci optimistic that stadiums could be full by late 2021
CDC to shorten COVID-19 quarantine to 10 days, 7 with test
Celebrities, stop partying like arrogant buffoons
A national pandemic plan — finally — comes to the rescue first of health care workers and the elderly
* NBC Chicago live blog headlines…
Pritzker Recommends COVID-19 Testing for Residents Who Traveled for Thanksgiving Holiday
Physicians Urge Drug Makers to Step Up Efforts to Ensure COVID Vaccine is Safe for Children
Arwady, Pritzker Don’t Anticipate COVID-19 Vaccine Will be Mandated by Officials
Chicago Could See Coronavirus Vaccine Within the Month, Health Officials Say
Chicago Includes 46 States, Puerto Rico in Coronavirus Travel Order Update
25 Comments
|
* Press release…
The Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) today reported 9,757 new confirmed and probable cases of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Illinois, including 238 additional deaths. Some data reported to IDPH is delayed from the weekends, including this past holiday weekend.
- Adams County: 1 male 80s, 1 male 90s
- Alexander County: 1 female 60s, 1 male 60s
- Boone County: 1 female 70s
- Bureau County: 3 males 70s, 1 female 80s
- Calhoun County: 1 female 60s
- Clay County: 1 female 70s
- Clinton County: 1 female 90s
- Coles County: 1 male 90s
- Cook County: 3 females 40s, 1 male 40s, 1 female 50s, 5 males 50s, 3 females 60s, 4 males 60s, 9 females 70s, 19 males 70s, 8 females 80s, 5 males 80s, 8 female 90s, 5 males 90s
- Cumberland County: 1 female 80s
- DuPage County: 1 male 50s, 2 males 60s, 1 female 70s, 5 males 70s, 2 males 80s, 1 female 90s,
- Edgar County: 1 male 90s
- Effingham County: 1 male 60s
- Fayette County: 1 female 70s, 1 female 80s
- Franklin County: 1 female 90s
- Grundy County: 1 male 80s, 1 female 90s
- Hamilton County: 1 male 70s
- Hancock County: 1 male 80s
- Hardin County: 1 male 80s
- Henry County: 1 male 70s, 1 female 90s, 1 male 90s
- Iroquois County: 2 males 80s
- Jasper County: 1 female 60s
- Jefferson County: 1 female 70s, 2 females 80s,
- Jo Daviess County: 1 female 60s
- Kane County: 1 male 50s, 1 male 60s, 1 female 80s, 2 males 80s, 1 male 90s, 1 male 100+
- Kankakee County: 1 female 80s, 2 males 80s, 2 females 90s
- Kendall County: 2 males 80s, 1 male 100+
- Knox County: 1 female 70s, 1 male 70s
- Lake County: 1 male 50s, 4 males 60s, 2 females 70s, 3 males 70s, 2 females 80s, 1 male 80s, 1 female 90s
- LaSalle County: 2 females 80s, 2 males 80s, 1 female 90s
- Lawrence County: 1 female 70s
- Lee County: 1 female 80s
- Livingston County: 1 female 60s, 1 female 70s, 1 male 80s, 3 females 90s, 1 male 90s
- Logan County: 1 female 80s
- Macon County: 1 female 80s, 1 male 80s, 1 female 90s, 1 male 90s
- Macoupin County: 1 female 70s
- Madison County: 1 female 80s, 1 female 90s
- Marion County: 2 females 60s, 2 females 70s, 1 male 70s, 1 female 80s, 1 female 90s
- Marshall County: 1 female 70s
- Massac County: 1 female 80s
- McHenry County: 1 female 70s, 1 female 80s, 3 males 80s, 1 female 90s, 2 males 90s
- Menard County: 1 female 70s
- Mercer County: 1 male 70s
- Monroe County: 1 female 80s
- Morgan County: 1 female 70s, 1 male 80s, 1 female 90s
- Moultrie County: 1 male 80s
- Ogle County: 1 male 90s, 1 female 100+
- Peoria County: 2 males 80s
- Perry County: 1 female 70s
- Pike County: 2 females 80s
- Rock Island County: 2 males 60s, 1 male 70s, 1 female 80s
- Saline County: 1 male 70s
- Sangamon County: 1 female 80s
- St. Clair County: 1 male 60s, 1 female 70s, 1 male 70s, 1 female 90s
- Tazewell County: 1 male 70s, 1 male 80s, 1 male 90s
- Vermilion County: 1 female 70s, 1 male 90s
- Whiteside County: 1 male 70s, 1 female 80s
- Will County: 1 female 60s, 3 males 70s, 1 female 80s, 1 male 80s, 1 female 90s
- Winnebago County: 1 female 50s, 1 male 50s, 1 male 60s, 1 male 70s, 1 female 80s, 5 males 80s, 1 male 90s
- Woodford County: 1 male 50s, 1 male 70s
Currently, IDPH is reporting a total of 748,603 cases, including 12,639 deaths, in 102 counties in Illinois. The age of cases ranges from younger than one to older than 100 years. Within the past 24 hours, laboratories have reported 85,507 specimens for a total 10,699,586. As of last night, 5,764 in Illinois were reported to be in the hospital with COVID-19. Of those, 1,190 patients were in the ICU and 714 patients with COVID-19 were on ventilators.
The preliminary seven-day statewide positivity for cases as a percent of total test from November 25 – December 1, 2020 is 10.6%. The preliminary seven-day statewide test positivity from November 25 – December 1, 2020 is 12.5%.
*All data are provisional and will change. In order to rapidly report COVID-19 information to the public, data are being reported in real-time. Information is constantly being entered into an electronic system and the number of cases and deaths can change as additional information is gathered. Information for deaths previously reported has changed, therefore, today’s numbers have been adjusted. For health questions about COVID-19, call the hotline at 1-800-889-3931 or email dph.sick@illinois.gov.
6 Comments
|
* From the Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs…
December 1, 2020
To residents, families or responsible parties, and staff of the Illinois Veterans Home at LaSalle:
We continue to be committed to communicating with you in a responsible and transparent manner about COVID-19 (coronavirus). Since our last COVID-19 update there has been one (1) additional case at our home. Also, after finding an error in my previous daily calculations, our overall numbers have been corrected. Since the beginning of the crisis we have had a total of 108 positive residents and 97 positive employees. To date, 35 residents and 76 staff have recovered from the virus. Unfortunately, we have lost an additional one (1) Veteran bringing the total number of Veterans with COVID-19 who have passed away to twenty-nine (29). We are following the latest medical guidance and are working with state, federal and local health officials to ensure the continued care for all of our residents and testing and protection of anyone potentially exposed.
As always, our top priority is the health and safety of our Veteran heroes and the devoted staff who care for them. Throughout this pandemic we have been following recommendations from state and local health officials to safeguard everyone at the facility and despite the outbreak we continue to do health screenings of staff and residents, maintain social distancing practices, wear face coverings, use gloves and gowns when indicated, and perform thorough cleaning and disinfection. We are grateful to our team for remaining highly vigilant for signs or symptoms of COVID-19 and for responding swiftly, appropriately, and professionally to any potential cases.
We understand this news can be distressing, which is why we encourage you to contact your loved ones for mutual support of one another. If your loved one has been affected by the virus, we want to offer you the opportunity to visit in person. Please understand this is a risk to your health and safety and though we will provide all the appropriate PPE, we cannot guarantee you will not contract the virus.
“Distressing.” How about terrifying?
Before the outbreak, the home had 121 residents and 230 employees.
* Pritzker’s campaign reaction after a common stomach bug outbreak happened in Quincy…
Yeah, maybe we need the same sort of energy put into addressing a problem that has killed a quarter of the LaSalle home’s residents.
91 Comments
|
[The following is a paid advertisement.]
Chicago Sun Times Editorial, 10/23/20:
Illinois is estimated to have lost 3,500 solar jobs already, and 1,000 more jobs could be gone by the end of the year…
Illinois has worked hard to become a leader in green energy, attracting jobs and improving the environment. The state is home to businesses installing solar and making use of “community development” projects, in which property owners without good access to sunlight can share projects with other property owners.
Why let that industrial advantage slip away?”
WTTW: The Funding Cliff Facing Illinois’ Solar Industry:
“Interest outstripped funding. Over 800 community solar projects were waitlisted, and the funding is due to run out before 2021. The impending loss of government financial support, coupled with the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, has put Illinois’s solar industry in a dangerous place.
…until legislation passes, companies like ReThink are living in uncertainty. “You’re going to have to lay off most of your workforce after we have trained them” without legislation, Heid predicts.
Act Now to Save Solar Jobs. Demand Immediate Legislative Action.
Learn more at www.pathto100.net.
Comments Off
|
* Back in August, the Illinois Supreme Court consolidated two Clay County cases and handed them to Sangamon County Judge Raylene Grischow. Attorney Tom DeVore was an attorney of record in both - defense in Pritzker, et al. v. Board of Education of Hutsonville (a school district which refused to abide by masking and other state rules) and for the plaintiffs in Mainer, et al. v. Illinois Department of Public Health (tanning salon owner challenging the legitimacy of the executive orders).
Judge Grischow issued an order yesterday and it’s a doozy. The state’s most esteemed COVID attorney got his head handed to him on procedural and legal grounds. Let’s start with this…
Despite the Court’s order that a written response to the motion be filed, the defendants in Hutsonville - the Board of Education of Hutsonville CUSD No. 1, Christian Child Development Corporation, and Parkview Christian Academy, Inc. (the “‘Hutsonville Defendants”)- and the plaintiffs in Mainer - James and Kali Mainer (together with the Hutsonville Defendants, the “School Parties”) - elected to forego a written response. Instead, they orally opposed the State Parties’ motion at a hearing held on November 16, 2020.
* This whole thing was a procedural mess…
First, the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure requires that when a complaint is verified, “every subsequent pleading must also be verified, unless verification is excused by the court.” 735 ILCS 5/2-605. Here, the Hutsonville complaint is verified; the defendants’ answer is not. The Court did not excuse verification, and the Hutsonville Defendants did not seek leave to amend their answer in order to comply with the verification requirement. Section 2-605 requires that once a pleading is verified in accordance with the act, “every subsequent pleading must also be verified unless verification is excused by the court.” 735 ILCS 5/2-605. When a subsequently field pleading is not properly verified in accordance with the act, “it is as if the unverified pleading was never filed; it must be disregarded.” … The Hutsonville Defendants are thus deemed to have admitted all well-pleaded facts alleged in the State Parties’ complaint.
And…
Second, in paragraphs 1-2, 9-10, 16-26, 32, 35-37, 39, 43–44, and 49 of their unverified answer, the Hutsonville Defendants state that they are without sufficient information to either admit or deny the State Parties’ allegations. When defendants are without sufficient information to admit or deny an allegation in a pleading, they must “attach[] an affidavit of the truth of the statement of want of knowledge ….”735 ILCS 5/2-610(a). The Hutsonville Defendants did not attach the required affidavit to their unverified answer. Therefore, even if the answer were verified, these particular allegations of the complaint would be deemed admitted.
And…
Third, in paragraphs 27-31, 34, 38, 40–42, 45–48, and 50-54 of their unverified answer the Hutsonville Defendants state that the allegation “speaks for itself.” But ‘”[t]he failure of a defendant to explicitly deny a specific allegation in the complaint will be considered a judicial admission and will dispense with the need of submitting proof on the issue.”‘
The judge said she could’ve dismissed the whole thing right there, but couldn’t resist the fun of chasing DeVore just once around the parking lot and proceeded to deal with the substantive issues.
* For example…
The School Parties do not identify any disputed material facts relating to the pleadings in either Hutsonville or Mainer. The parties thus agree that there is no genuine issue of material fact relating to the State Parties’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. As a result, the only question here is a legal one: whether the Governor’s executive orders requiring schools to comply with certain public health measures associated with in-person instruction, and the Guidance issued jointly by the Illinois State Board of Education (”ISBE”) and the Illinois Department of Public Health (”IDPH”) detailing those measures (see Hutsonville Complaint, Exhibit 1), were lawfully issued and enforceable. The Court previously answered that question in the affirmative, and sees no reason to change its view. See August 18, 2020 Hutsonville Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order (”TRO Order”).
Oops.
* More from a footnote…
Counsel for the School Parties conceded at the November 16, 2020 Hearing that the existence of a disaster under Section 4 is not disputed.
Um. Nice move, dude.
* Statutory authority…
A comprehensive reading of the IEMAA supports the conclusion that the legislature did not intend to limit the Governor’s authority [to only one 30-day executive order per disaster].
And she referenced the bills passed by the General Assembly in May…
The legislature recognized the Governor’s authority to issue successive disaster proclamations when they amended the Unemployment Insurance Act, the Sexual Assault Provider Emergency Treatment Act, the Township Code, and the Election Code.
* Concessions have consequences…
In addition to this statutory authority, the Governor has constitutional authority under Article V, § 8 of the Illinois Constitution to take action to protect the public health. The United States Supreme Court more than a century ago in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), developed a framework by which to evaluate a State’s exercise of emergency powers during a public health crisis. The Court may take judicial notice of the fact-not disputed by the School Parties-that Illinois is in the middle of a public health crisis as outlined in Jacobson.
Accordingly, unless the action taken by the State Parties bears “no real or substantial relation” to the protection of public health, or is “beyond all question, a plain, palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law,” neither this Court, nor any vocal citizen or school district has the authority to second guess the policy decisions made by the executive in responding to the emergency. . The Governor’s Executive Orders, as well as the Guidance, have a real or substantial relation to the protection of the public health and the public safety by attempting to minimize the spread of this deadly virus.
* And then comes the real beat-down…
The State Parties’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is granted in its entirety as to both Mainer, et al. v. Illinois Department of Public Health, et al. (No. 20-CH-13) and Pritzker, et al. v. Board of Education of Hutsonville CUSD No. 1, et al. (No. 20-MR-557).
A judgment on the pleadings is similar to summary judgment. It’s explained in the ruling.
* And for good measure…
The Hutsonville Defendants are ordered to comply with the Governor’s Executive Orders and Guidance which applies to all public and nonpublic schools in Illinois serving prekindergarten through 12th grade students. This Guidance includes, but is not limited to:
a. Requiring the use of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), including face coverings;
b. Prohibiting more than 50 individuals from gathering in one space;
c. Requiring social distancing be observed, as much as possible;
d. Requiring schools to conduct symptom screening and temperature checks or require that individuals self-certify that they are free of symptoms before entering school buildings;
e. Requiring an increase in schoolwide cleaning and disinfection; and
f. Following any requirements as outlined in the Guidance as well as any changes that occur as a result of changing public health conditions.
This is a final judgment pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 304(a) and there is no just reason for delaying either enforcement or appeal or both of this Judgment Order.
[Link has been fixed. Sorry about that.]
49 Comments
|
Thanks. I really needed that
Wednesday, Dec 2, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller
* This story is so hilarious on so many levels that it ought to win some sort of an award…
SCOOP: If a reality TV star can be president, then there’s nothing stopping radio shock jock Erich “Mancow” Muller from running for governor of Illinois.
The former morning radio host on WLS 890-AM is “exploring” the idea of running as a Republican or Independent in 2022. “I would not be a party-first candidate but a people-first candidate,” Mancow told Playbook in a phone interview.
He says the idea of running for office grew during the pandemic when a restaurant he owns, Marchesa, began struggling. “It’s been impossible to do business. Illinois has become an unhealthy, inhospitable place. Common sense is dead in our state, and I’d like to bring it back,” Mancow said. He questions Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s handling of the pandemic, saying, “Covid numbers are greatly exaggerated and killing Chicago businesses.”
Mancow left WLS last month and has long been interested in politics. Along with talking to politicians, he’s been known to carry their banner, too. Last year, he hosted a fundraising dinner to benefit Roger Stone, the friend and former adviser to Donald Trump who was convicted of seven felonies before the president commuted his sentence this summer. […]
Though he hasn’t formed an official exploratory committee, Mancow says he’s spoken to Republicans and to independent politico Willie Wilson, who could help finance such a campaign.
Mancow wants political “wonk” Paul Vallas as his lieutenant governor. Vallas told Playbook that he enjoys talking to Mancow but he’s not interested in running on his ticket. Mancow says he’s working to change Vallas’ mind.
“Too wack for Paul Vallas” would be a fabulous campaign slogan. Also, too, if you act now and purchase our “The Pandemic is Greatly Exaggerated” t-shirt today, we’ll throw in an “I ❤️️ Roger Stone” bumper sticker for $30 shipping and handling.
Not even Illinois is that nuts.
64 Comments
|
Open thread
Wednesday, Dec 2, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Please be polite to each other and keep the conversation Illinois-centric. Thanks.
19 Comments
|
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
   
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|
