Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Appearances can be deceiving when it comes to the state budget
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Appearances can be deceiving when it comes to the state budget

Monday, Apr 26, 2021 - Posted by Rich Miller

* My weekly syndicated newspaper column

The fiscal news in Illinois of late has been a whole lot better than just about anyone expected. March’s base general funds revenue grew by $422 million versus a year ago, mainly because of stronger than expected receipts of personal and corporate income taxes and sales taxes. That follows a growth of $330 million in February’s receipts.

The revenue surge has been so rosy that some have openly wondered whether Gov. J.B. Pritzker was telling the truth last year when he warned voters that failing to approve a graduated income tax, which would’ve eventually produced more than $3 billion a year in new revenues, would result in budget cuts or higher taxes.

But a little noticed budget forecast published during spring break by the Legislature’s Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability threw cold water on all the excitement.

“The 2017 income tax increase closed some of the structural gap in the budget but the state still has more work to do to truly be able to operate under a sustainable model moving forward,” COGFA reported.

That structural budget gap also came up in a recent report by the University of Illinois’ Institute of Government and Public Affairs, which noted that Illinois’ expenditures exceeded revenue by roughly 10% each year between 2010 and 2020.

But back to COGFA’s report, which claimed that, “as demonstrated in this report, based on forecast models, the state needs to raise more revenue and/or reduce expenditures.”

The commission produced several scenarios, including one that used the projected spending for this fiscal year and next fiscal year and applied the 2.7% annual spending growth averaged here over the past five years. In that scenario, the Fiscal Year 2022 deficit would be $1.2 billion, FY23’s deficit would be $1.7 billion and the FY24 budget would have a $1.9 billion hole and a $9.9 billion backlog on paying bills. That backlog is currently $5.4 billion.

Basing projections on the same two fiscal years with an average 3.2% spending growth seen in Illinois over the past ten years, the projected Fiscal Year 2024 deficit grows to $2.3 billion and the bill backlog would be $10.6 billion.

But basing calculations on only this fiscal year’s spending would produce even higher deficits and backlogs: A $5 billion deficit and a $19.1 billion backlog by FY2024 assuming a 2.7% annual spending growth; and a whopping $5.7 billion deficit and a $20.5 billion bill backlog assuming a 3.2% spending growth.

To bring the bill backlog down to zero dollars, COGFA calculated that the state would need annual spending cuts of 5.3% and 4.7%, depending on which fiscal year spending base was used in the projection.

Zero-growth budgets would produce a $413 million surplus and a $6.5 billion backlog by 2024 in one scenario and a $1.4 billion deficit and a $12 billion backlog in the other.

But even achieving flat spending is hugely difficult because of ever-increasing pension obligations, medical inflation and education spending pressures, not to mention all the other programs that legislators and governors devise.

One of COGFA’s suggestions is to reduce statutory interest rates on past-due bills of between 9 and 12% annually, which it claimed could reduce spending by $15 million to $45 million per year. While it looks good on paper, the hard fact remains that vendors have been stiffed for two decades by this state and it’s already difficult to find people who will do business with Illinois. Cutting that interest rate would make it even tougher.

COGFA also suggested expanding the sales tax base, which is something the governor has rejected.

But the commission did have one piece of sound advice: Use the $7.5 billion from the federal government’s new American Rescue Plan to pay off the money borrowed from the feds, pay down the state’s bill backlog, use some of the cash to generate as much federal matching funds as possible and patch any COVID-caused budgetary holes.

That definitely would help keep down the projected bill backlogs, but it wouldn’t do much to correct the structural budget problems Illinois has had for many years. That opportunity was lost last November when Pritzker’s “Fair Tax” plan went down in flames at the polls.

While the governor’s $1 billion “corporate loopholes” proposal would make a dent in those projected holes, a new and comprehensive plan is necessary. But it’ll be pretty tough with an election year right around the corner. Petitions can be circulated in about five months.

* Meanwhile, here’s Capitol News Illinois

A phased repeal of the corporate franchise tax, an addition to what properties qualify for the state’s machinery and equipment sales tax exemption, and a tax deduction for creating new construction jobs in the state were added to the budget proposal put forth by Pritzker in 2019 to secure Republican support.

All three provisions would be delayed or removed in the governor’s plan in order to generate approximately $102 million in savings for FY 22

That third provision, branded as the Blue Collar Jobs Act, was meant to go into effect Jan. 2021. At the time of its passage, the bill was touted by both Pritzker and Republicans as a tax credit that would bring more jobs and businesses to Illinois.

However, the construction worker tax credit had its implementation delayed by Pritzker, who cited losses in tax revenue due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Sen. Chapin Rose, R-Mahomet, questioned Sturm, the governor’s budget director, on why a program passed with bipartisan support needed to be cut if the state expected a surplus.

       

17 Comments
  1. - Rabid - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 5:51 am:

    The GOP wanted unfair taxes, they got unfair taxes with bipartisan support


  2. - willowglen - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 9:33 am:

    Excellent article, Mr. Miller. Would love to see more articles relating financials in detail. The structural problem seems intractable, even with a progressive tax which of course is off the table for several years. I am shocked at the bill backlog projections by 2024. The state could have a bill backlog approaching half of its annual budget. Just how can that kind of hole be patched?


  3. - Lucky Pierre - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 9:39 am:

    Apparently the GOP was not alone in demanding structural reforms to limit the growth of government spending before passing another tax hike.

    JB proving once again he is one of the most progressive (partisan) Governors in America who does not keep his promises


  4. - RNUG - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 9:55 am:

    I don’t know how big a deal the 9% / 12% interest really is in keeping suppliers. I know of a couple of national suppliers that don’t care about the interest because they’ve been burned too many times; they demand pre-payment / cash on delivery.


  5. - RNUG - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 9:57 am:

    == . I am shocked at the bill backlog projections by 2024. ==

    When you keep piling deficit on top of deficit … stuff piles up.


  6. - Donnie Elgin - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 10:07 am:

    It is not a great Monday. Huge structural deficits for years to come; the 2020 census will announce a shrinking population with the loss of one (or two) members of the Illinois congressional delegation.


  7. - City Zen - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 10:09 am:

    ==COGFA also suggested expanding the sales tax base, which is something the governor has rejected.==

    Expanding the sales tax base while simultaneously lowering the sales tax rate would broaden and stabilize that revenue stream while generating more revenue in the long term.


  8. - Anyone Remember - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 10:10 am:

    “… limit the growth of government spending … .”

    You’re either advocating walking away from the Edgar Pension Ramp or removing the pension protection clause from the Constituion. Or are you using this type of arithmetic?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bfq5kju627c


  9. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 10:12 am:

    ===while simultaneously lowering the sales tax rate would broaden and stabilize that revenue stream while generating more revenue===

    I dunno about that. Devil is in the details and I have yet to see a plan that I can recall which is revenue positive.


  10. - Lucky Pierre - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 10:12 am:

    Illinois expenditures exceeded revenue by roughly 10% each year between 2010 and 2020?

    The University of Illinois Institute of Government and Public Affairs must be staffed by a team of carnival barkers.

    So much for a constitutionally mandated balanced budget


  11. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 10:37 am:

    === But the commission did have one piece of sound advice: Use the $7.5 billion from the federal government’s new American Rescue Plan to pay off the money borrowed from the feds, pay down the state’s bill backlog, use some of the cash to generate as much federal matching funds as possible and patch any COVID-caused budgetary holes.===

    This should be a no-brainer, slam dunk, done deal.

    The long term structural deficits that exist are the helped as much as doing this suggestion for fiscal health in both the immediate and short term of 5 years or less.


  12. - 1st Ward - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 10:38 am:

    “walking away from the Edgar Pension Ramp”

    Re-amortizing the Edgar Ramp will be pushed by localities. The options are re-amortize or issue PO Bonds. We already tried the latter. Not very popular based on results. The risk of a re-amortization is a lower rating. I have a hard time thinking voters care about State & Local credit rating and probably can’t tell you what ours currently is.


  13. - Anyone Remember - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 11:03 am:

    “The risk of a re-amortization is a lower rating.”

    And, at Illinois’ current rating, the lower rating is Junk Status.


  14. - 1st Ward - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 11:17 am:

    “And, at Illinois’ current rating, the lower rating is Junk Status.”

    And the ramifications would be what exactly? CPS and the City of Chicago have had junk ratings for 5+ years. Not ideal but it’s the cleanest shirt in the dirty hamper.


  15. - Cool Papa Bell - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 11:18 am:

    =“The risk of a re-amortization is a lower rating.”=

    =And, at Illinois’ current rating, the lower rating is Junk Status=

    So is this possible? Would it cost more to pay what the ramp requires each year or would it cost more to borrow at junk status?


  16. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 11:21 am:

    ===And the ramifications would be what exactly?===

    Bruce? Is that you?


  17. - Blake - Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 12:46 pm:

    In the long run extending the ramp would cost more in pension payments in addition to bond interest rates potentially being higher. The earlier a dollar gets into the pension funds, the less the state pays long run.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Madigan trial roundup: Solis leaves the witness stand
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Appellate court grants 35-day stay in Grayson release hearing
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller