Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Climate/energy talks still down to a “singular albeit complicated issue”
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Climate/energy talks still down to a “singular albeit complicated issue”

Tuesday, Sep 7, 2021 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Background is here if you need it. My weekly syndicated newspaper column

While a huge cloud of coal ash exploded around Springfield’s coal-fired electric power plant on Tuesday afternoon, Illinois’ top three Democrats huddled in a conference room at the Statehouse trying to find a way to slash power plant carbon emissions in the state to zero by 2045.

The irony was both unmistakable and irresistible.

The giant ash plume, caused by an equipment failure, dissipated hours later. But by then it also was clear that any attempt to pass a climate/energy bill by the end of the day was doomed — and that was a human failure.

The Senate’s Democrats have controlled the negotiations on the climate/energy bill for more than two years, but Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s office obviously has wanted to take control of the process from the start. They just think they know better, on this and many other topics.

That conflict has led to untold sniping, which is not surprising given that Pritzker and Senate President Don Harmon have battled since even before the governor backed a candidate against Harmon in the Senate president’s race in early 2020.

Pritzker walked away from the energy talks at the end of this past spring session when Harmon wouldn’t agree to close the state’s two municipally owned coal-fired electric power plants in Springfield and the Metro East by 2035. Pritzker again walked away in mid-June when Harmon tried to piggyback onto the week’s session agenda of correcting the House appropriations bill’s many fatal mistakes with a bill to fix the climate/energy bill. But Harmon ultimately couldn’t unite unions and environmentalists on the new legislation, though Pritzker by then had agreed to extend the coal plant closure dates to 2045.

Then history repeated itself last week when the General Assembly’s focus was supposed to be on the legislative remap do-over. Harmon couldn’t close the climate/energy deal talks amidst numerous large and small objections from the governor and the greens. Blame Harmon, blame Pritzker, blame whomever. The talks failed.

Three strikes, you’re out, etc., so now the ball is in Pritzker’s court. Harmon finally surrendered control and punted a climate/energy bill to the House, where Speaker Chris Welch has warned both Pritzker and Harmon that he isn’t moving a bill unless all three agree to it.

Harmon’s game plan obviously has been to appease trade unions in order to fund his party’s redistricting-year campaigns in 2022. Speaker Welch has never expected to receive the same level of support from the white-dominated trade unions that flooded the kitty of his predecessor Michael Madigan, so he appears to be aligning himself with our billionaire governor to help fund the 2022 campaign season.

But, in reality, maybe it was time to hand all this over to fresh eyes, because what the Senate was doing just didn’t move the ball forward enough.

The proceedings last week often devolved into petty one-upmanship.

The week’s initial Senate Democratic proposal imposed such strict limitations on carbon emissions by municipally-owned electric power plants like Springfield’s CWLP and the Metro East’s gigantic Prairie State Energy Campus that there was no likely way either plant could survive until 2045, though no closure date was inserted into the legislation. But the governor had demanded a “date certain” closure for both plants, so the Senate Dems drastically revised their bill to allow the plants to pump out 100% of the carbon they are currently spewing all the way through to 2045, and only then would they have to stop.

No way would that be acceptable. It was an almost juvenile response.

The governor’s office countered with a combination of proposals: Scale down the coal plants’ carbon emissions over the years and then shut everything down in 2045. The proposal was rejected out of hand.

Senate President Harmon told reporters that he believed it was too uneconomical for the companies to both reduce their carbon footprint and stop production before they’d finished paying for their pollution-reduction efforts. The governor’s office believes the plants qualify for federal tax credits to subsidize the step-down, and they want time to convince Prairie State to take the money and the deal. Word is that an offer has been made directly to the electricity provider.

Unless attitudes change, the whole thing might just turn out to be too big for a state legislature to tackle. Harmon called the energy bill the most complicated piece of legislation he’s dealt with in 21 years. He’s probably right.

* This was issued last night by the governor’s office…

Negotiations on a comprehensive energy package that puts consumers and climate first continued this weekend with the shared goal of advancing legislation that will save jobs, gradually put Illinois on a path to clean energy in the years ahead, and foster job growth in clean energy industries. The administration looks forward to continuing discussions with our partners in the General Assembly.

Looks like optimism.

* “We are nearly there,” says the labor-backed Climate Jobs Illinois. But…

“Illinois’ labor community has a long, rich history of taking on and winning tough fights in the interests of working men and women, from advocating for safer working conditions to pressing for better wages and benefits that uplift families and provide greater opportunities for future generations.

As we celebrate this Labor Day, our coalition and our counterparts are taking on the greatest fight of our generation, with the threat of climate change growing every day.

We are convinced that we can win this fight but only if we work together by enacting a comprehensive clean energy bill that puts working people first, that expands opportunities for historically disinvested communities and that creates a just transition for workers in the fossil fuel industry.

We are nearly there.

A deal hinges on a singular albeit complicated issue. Labor has made significant compromises during this process, as have the other parties. We commit to continuing to work through the one remaining difference to reach an agreed bill.

We owe it to our members, to their families and to all future generations to continue this fight until we get it right. Put more simply, we cannot afford to fail. We urge the members of the House of Representatives to take up this bill and get it across the finish line.”

And it looks like the House will be back Thursday if they can get their act together by then. Some of you may have read a hugely optimistic take elsewhere this morning. But the take omitted the fact that organized labor is still not agreed on that “singular albeit complicated issue”: municipally owned coal-fired electric plants. I do think they’re making progress. I don’t think anybody is opening up the champagne, but I should know more later this morning.

       

14 Comments
  1. - Kathy - Tuesday, Sep 7, 21 @ 9:31 am:

    Can the House muster the votes if organized labor is opposed? Is the Governor’s staff talking with organized labor? At least the Ethics Bill will get dealt with if the House meets this Thursday.


  2. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Sep 7, 21 @ 9:40 am:

    Great stuff by Rich, bringing the inside politics out to bring clarity to the “one last hiccup”

    To the post,

    Harmon stalled and delayed the bill as long as he could for his labor constituency, even declaring “it’s not dead” back in the spring, which seems like years ago, then passes a bill that’s a punt, nowhere near what could pass the House or get signed, and left the honest work of compromise to the governor and Welch, who, both the Governor and Welch, need to now get something that is a win for everyone that Harmon decidedly wasn’t keen on getting.

    There’s a great deal of drama right now, Welch not passing anything that isn’t fully agreed, that might make the Senate part of this ending more interesting


  3. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Sep 7, 21 @ 9:42 am:

    ===Can the House muster the votes if organized labor is opposed?===

    No.


  4. - TNR - Tuesday, Sep 7, 21 @ 9:49 am:

    == The week’s initial Senate Democratic proposal imposed such strict limitations on carbon emissions by municipally-owned electric power plants…that there was no likely way either plant could survive until 2045, though no closure date was inserted. ==

    That seems like a reasonable approach. Why fight over something that might or might not happen 24 years from now? I wouldn’t be surprised if the final agreement ends up looking a lot like that.


  5. - Flyin' Elvis'-Utah Chapter - Tuesday, Sep 7, 21 @ 10:05 am:

    High of 89 in Portland, OR. today.


  6. - PublicServant - Tuesday, Sep 7, 21 @ 10:06 am:

    === puts working people first ===

    How about their kids? Pour some money into clean energy investments, and retrain/train working people to continue to work in good-paying jobs in clean energy.


  7. - City Zen - Tuesday, Sep 7, 21 @ 10:11 am:

    Is the “greatest fight of our generation” climate or jobs? Because a “comprehensive clean energy bill that puts working people first” doesn’t seem focused on the climate.


  8. - Annonin' - Tuesday, Sep 7, 21 @ 10:22 am:

    put climate and consumers first…TOO PAY
    But that was expected non performing nukes. renewable, labor all taken care of by rate payers. And then the companies will dole out stuff like alaways… And…. We all know the rest
    BTW will Durkie and other GOPies still vote yea like they did in May?


  9. - MisterJayEm - Tuesday, Sep 7, 21 @ 10:32 am:

    “It was an almost juvenile response.”

    Rich’s use of “almost” was very charitable.

    – MrJM


  10. - thechampaignlife - Tuesday, Sep 7, 21 @ 11:24 am:

    ===Because a “comprehensive clean energy bill that puts working people first” doesn’t seem focused on the climate.===

    Did you miss the “clean” part that comprehensive clean energy bill?

    ===a huge cloud of coal ash exploded around Springfield’s coal-fired electric power plant===

    I have yet to see an environmental disaster from a solar spill.

    ===too uneconomical for the companies to both reduce their carbon footprint and stop production before they’d finished paying for their pollution-reduction efforts===

    A 20% stepdown in emission caps every 5 years might work. That paired with a rate setting policy that provides for guaranteed cost recovery, backstopped by state dollars from 2045 when the pension ramp ends, and you have soup.


  11. - Anon221 - Tuesday, Sep 7, 21 @ 1:23 pm:

    thechampaignlife- “I have yet to see an environmental disaster from a solar spill.”

    Regardless of the energy source, if thought is not put into the ultimate decommissioning of the source and its components, then we may well just be creating a new type of “spill”.

    https://www.wired.com/story/solar-panels-are-starting-to-die-leaving-behind-toxic-trash/


  12. - Blue Dog - Tuesday, Sep 7, 21 @ 2:53 pm:

    If you have ever seen the environmental impact from a lithium mine, you may not be so sure about the enviro-friendly tag.


  13. - thechampaignlife - Tuesday, Sep 7, 21 @ 4:18 pm:

    Most solar does not use batteries, and not all batteries are lithium.

    @Anon221: Totally agree about considering the entire lifecycle, but there are manageable solutions for electronics recycling, and the alternative of coal mining, transportation, emissions, and waste have a far greater impact and immediate danger. Hydro, wind, solar, and nuclear all fit into the portfolio, all with their own issues, but all better than the status quo.


  14. - Blue Dog - Tuesday, Sep 7, 21 @ 5:14 pm:

    Most EVs use lithium batteries. Anyone wanting to store solar energy would be hard pressed not to use lithium batteries.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the holiday weekend
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Jack Conaty
* New state law to be tested by Will County case
* Why did ACLU Illinois staffers picket the organization this week?
* Hopefully, IDHS will figure this out soon
* Pete Townshend he ain't /s
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller