Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Legislative action was required to counter a ridiculous conscientious objection to being tested for COVID-19
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Legislative action was required to counter a ridiculous conscientious objection to being tested for COVID-19

Monday, Nov 1, 2021 - Posted by Rich Miller

* My weekly syndicated newspaper column

The current topsy-turvy political landscape was on full display in the Illinois House and the Senate last week as the chamber debated and passed a bill to slightly narrow the scope of the Illinois Health Care Right of Conscience Act.

A bedrock Republican Party principle over the years has been to help shield employers from frivolous lawsuits. But every single Republican voted against a bill in the two chambers that would effectively prevent anyone who is fired or punished after refusing to take regular COVID-19 tests from suing their employer and recovering triple damages, including pain and suffering.

Public school teachers, for example, must now either be vaccinated or submit to regular virus testing, yet several unvaccinated teachers are suing because they do not want to take any tests. A court loss by those districts could be very costly, but some judges are siding with plaintiffs and concluding that a law designed to protect doctors who refuse to perform abortions also applies to people who don’t want to be vaccinated or get tested.

Democrats are usually all-in on the right of employees to sue, but definitely not in this instance. Like I said, topsy-turvy.

Also, for a year and a half now, Republicans have been demanding that the super-majority legislative Democrats vote on bills related to the pandemic rather than sit idly by while Gov. J.B. Pritzker issues executive orders.

But, when the Democrats finally took up the Health Care Right of Conscience Act legislation last week, folks like Rep. Dan Caulkins (R-Decatur) argued that the General Assembly ought to drop this issue and instead allow the courts to decide whether the HCRCA applies to the current controversy over vaccines and testing.

That makes no sense considering the endless GOP demands that the General Assembly “do something.” But, in reality, that demand for legislative action has mainly been a rhetorical device to allow the Republicans to avoid commenting directly on a range of pandemic topics. Last week’s vote, however, smoked them out.

Pretty much all polling shows that the majority of Republican voters oppose things like COVID-19 vaccine and mask mandates. So, it’s no surprise that Republican legislators would also be opposed to this change, particularly in a redistricting year when legislators will have new turf to defend and primary opponents can always pop up out of the blue.

What is a tiny bit surprising, though, is that the Republican Party has become so completely monolithic.

The party has for decades in this state included several legislators who were willing to break ranks on things like taxation, labor unions and abortion. But those members have left office, lost primaries to more conservative Republicans, lost general elections to more liberal Democrats or, in the case of folks like Sen. Terri Bryant (R-Murphysboro) who voted for the 2017 tax hike, lurched to the far right. It’s also easier to be unified in the super-minority party, mainly because there is so little pressure or enticement to participate in actual governance. The age of Donald Trump has forced the entire party into a niche, whether party members like it or not.

Unlike the Republicans, House Democrats were not totally unified on the HCRCA legislation last week. It probably didn’t help that tens of thousands of electronic witness slips were filed in opposition to the bill.

Seven House Democrats wound up voting against the measure: Carol Ammons of Urbana, Kelly Burke of Evergreen Park, Anthony Deluca of Chicago Heights, Stephanie Kifowit of Oswego and John D’Amico, Mary Flowers and Fran Hurley of Chicago. Two voted “Present”: Angie Guerrero-Cuellar of Chicago and Rita Mayfield of Waukegan.

In the Senate, six Democrats sided with the opposition: Rachelle Aud Crowe of Glen Carbon, Suzy Glowiak Hilton of Western Springs, Mike Hastings of Frankfort, Patrick Joyce of Essex, Meg Loughran Cappel of Shorewood and Doris Turner of Springfield. Four Democrats didn’t vote: Tom Cullerton of Villa Park, Napoleon Harris of Harvey, and Rob Martwick and Tony Muñoz of Chicago.

That Democratic opposition was enough to bring the final tallies below the threshold needed for an immediate effective date on the legislation, so it won’t take effect until June 1 of next year. But it’s likely the two chambers will vote on it again in January, when it can take effect immediately. In the meantime, the governor’s and attorney general’s offices believe the action was probably enough to stave off the lawsuits.

All because some folks who won’t get vaccinated say they have some mysterious conscientious objection to being tested for a disease and would sue any employer who claims otherwise.

Ridiculous.

       

16 Comments
  1. - H-W - Monday, Nov 1, 21 @ 9:43 am:

    Nice. Hopefully, any cases that appear before the courts prior to January will be decided based on the spirit and most parsimonious interpretations of the law, rather than the most liberal interpretation which the republican plaintiffs are seeking. Good grief. We have lost our sense of community it would seem.


  2. - MisterJayEm - Monday, Nov 1, 21 @ 9:43 am:

    “What is a tiny bit surprising, though, is that the Republican Party has become so completely monolithic.”

    While Illinois’s moderate Republicans survived the “Reagan Revolution,” the Trump Devolution has completely transformed and twisted the party.

    No longer any room for non-cuckoo thinkers.

    – MrJM


  3. - Anyone Remember - Monday, Nov 1, 21 @ 9:54 am:

    [Sarcasm font on] The Democrats should let a GOP bill to permit COVID vaccination denial be heard in committee, and then one of the Democrats should introduce an amendment to delete “COVID” and insert “Polio” and then allow debate.


  4. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Nov 1, 21 @ 10:03 am:

    Great read, Rich.

    This is so on point it’s scary to the honesty;

    === What is a tiny bit surprising, though, is that the Republican Party has become so completely monolithic.

    The party has for decades in this state included several legislators who were willing to break ranks on things like taxation, labor unions and abortion. But those members have left office, lost primaries to more conservative Republicans, lost general elections to more liberal Democrats or, in the case of folks like Sen. Terri Bryant (R-Murphysboro) who voted for the 2017 tax hike, lurched to the far right. It’s also easier to be unified in the super-minority party, mainly because there is so little pressure or enticement to participate in actual governance. The age of Donald Trump has forced the entire party into a niche, whether party members like it or not.===

    The old, angry, white, rural GOP… the Raunerite GOP that shed pro-labor Republicans and the phony legislators who voted against higher ed and purposely hurt their regions fir Rauner, this slide into the Trumpkin ignorance is not only embraced, but the cult must be obeyed… even is science gets in the way.

    I’ve been screaming in the wind since the first budgetary destruction Rauner engineered, along with the encouraging of non-Raunerites leaving the stage for mere seat warming switch turners…

    … the irony, of course, is Rauner shunned Trump all the way until the end when Rauner, in full costume and phony lingo went south for a rally that Trump ignored him at, and sent a message.

    Rauner set the table, forced a purge, allowed Jeanne Ives to control “the base”, and even with the millions Rauner had, the beast that he helped empower turned on him… and the cult that has to have legislative action to help end a global pandemic is the result.

    Chairman Tracy exposed the truth to this too, welcoming racist thinkers, insurrectionists, and conspiracy theorists who see this shot, these vaccinations as some sort of ridiculous religious culling of a herd of sheep that believe facts and science… so they must be evil.

    The ILGOP, the caucuses, the members, the entire party needs this battle to make that monolithic evolution become the monolithic litmus test to ensure purity remains well after this vaccine battle of ignorance.

    No free thinking with this ILGOP, they learned the lesson from Rauner… Bruce wore the costume and was shunned… you need to become a full clown to get that blessing needed… even at the cost of our health.


  5. - Flyin' Elvis'-Utah Chapter - Monday, Nov 1, 21 @ 10:09 am:

    Remember a time when I opted for the Rep over the Dem if I wasn’t sure about either.

    Figured the R would be more level-headed.

    Seems so long ago.


  6. - DIrtLawyer - Monday, Nov 1, 21 @ 10:12 am:

    =====Hopefully, any cases that appear before the courts prior to January will be decided based on the spirit and most parsimonious interpretations of the law, rather than the most liberal interpretation which the republican plaintiffs are seeking. =====

    While not dispositive of the case, several dozen more plaintiffs were added to the Kankakee County hospital TRO on Friday afternoon, and the hearing on the preliminary injunction was continued until January.


  7. - Norseman - Monday, Nov 1, 21 @ 10:29 am:

    What we are witnessing is Forward to the Past where public health gains in curtailing preventable communicable disease will be reversed in addition to other societal advances. This is being pushed because a narcissistic sociopath led his party down a path of lies and misdirection for partisan benefit. Lives have been lost and will be lost.

    I fear this bill will not be sufficient to halt this problem in Illinois. We’ll see the pandemic continue much longer than necessary and the resulting economic damage will bring the perpetrating party the political benefit they wanted.


  8. - JS Mill - Monday, Nov 1, 21 @ 10:58 am:

    @Norseman is spot on, but there is a much more organized and intentional process going on than simply cult-like following of Trump. This little man and his pathological narcissism definitely moved it into overdrive though.


  9. - Grandson of Man - Monday, Nov 1, 21 @ 11:03 am:

    It seems like in the old days the GOP would have been pro-vaccine and pro-mandate. But today the party basically is right wing economic types plus Trumpers, ALEC and Alex Jones, so to speak.


  10. - Jocko - Monday, Nov 1, 21 @ 11:32 am:

    ==unvaccinated teachers are suing because they do not want to take any tests.==

    It’s funny how people don’t hesitate to throw out meat or vegetables when the CDC says they’re unsafe, but choose to ignore (even flout) their advice in the middle of a pandemic.


  11. - illinifan - Monday, Nov 1, 21 @ 12:18 pm:

    Norseman “This is being pushed because a narcissistic sociopath led his party down a path of lies and misdirection for partisan benefit.” I hate to give DT this much credit and power. He stepped into an opening that was there and gave voice to what a fringe within the Republican Party was already thinking. Now the crazies have taken over the asylum formerly known as the GOP


  12. - Louis G Atsaves - Monday, Nov 1, 21 @ 12:22 pm:

    @MrJM, thanks to Reagan’s 80% rule, the GOP of his era was more tolerant and less monolithic. Now when I ask what happened to the 80% rule, I get glares back for an answer.


  13. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Nov 1, 21 @ 12:26 pm:

    ===Now when I ask what happened to the 80% rule, I get glares back for an answer.===

    Wasn’t it YOU as one during the Rauner years that made clear that if you didn’t back the Turnaround Agenda of Rauner that was not being a good Republican?

    I can check if you’d like…


  14. - Louis G Atsaves - Monday, Nov 1, 21 @ 12:32 pm:

    @Oswego Willy, nice anti-80% glare of a response.


  15. - Pundent - Monday, Nov 1, 21 @ 1:09 pm:

    =Now when I ask what happened to the 80% rule, I get glares back for an answer.=

    You can’t long for the days of Reagan while being complicit in the banishment of Adam Kinzinger.


  16. - ArchPundit - Monday, Nov 1, 21 @ 4:33 pm:

    ====Now when I ask what happened to the 80% rule, I get glares back for an answer.

    How do you support a platform 80 percent when the only thing to it is Donald Trump is good and no actual platform? I guess if unquestioning allegiance to an individual is the party platform, the 80% rule gets kind of hard to even consider.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller