Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Pritzker signs bill designed to limit the types of contributions to judicial campaigns
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Pritzker signs bill designed to limit the types of contributions to judicial campaigns

Tuesday, Nov 16, 2021 - Posted by Rich Miller

* We talked about this last month, but here’s Hannah Meisel

Campaign contributions from out-of-staters and so-called dark money groups will be banned in Illinois judicial campaigns beginning in January under legislation Gov. JB Pritzker signed into law Monday. […]

But making Illinois the first state to outright ban certain political contributions to judicial candidates is the biggest change contained in the law, which comes a year after an Illinois Supreme Court justice first elected as a Democrat became the first sitting high court member in state history to lose his retention bid — an expensive race fueled in part by dark money.

Republicans voted against Stuart’s legislation last month, with several members arguing during the House debate that the majority party was making another adjustment in state elections law to benefit their party.

“This is another effort for the majority [party] to change the rules of the game because they don’t like the outcome,” State Rep. Ryan Spain (R-Peoria) said before voting no on the bill. “And the voters of the state of Illinois are noticing that the policies and practices and elected officials that they’ve put in power have not served them well.”

I mean, I get it, but I’m still not sure how you can claim with a straight face that a bill to ban dark money contributions is a scary bad thing.

* There’s more to the omnibus bill

The law also makes adjustments in deadlines and other technical requirements for candidates in next year’s primary election because it’s later. Pritzker signed a law in June moving the primary from March 15 to June 28 because late-arriving 2020 Census numbers delayed the drawing of new congressional district boundaries.

Under the law, which takes effect immediately, any polling place that is accessible to voters with disabilities and elderly voters shall include at least one voting booth that is wheelchair accessible. […]

Another change allows voters to designate sex on voter registration forms as “male,” “female” or “non-binary.”

…Adding… Republican gubernatorial candidate Paul Schimpf…

Out of all of the items included in SB 536, improving and increasing election integrity safeguards was not one of them.

If the Democrats are going to make voting vastly more accessible, they need to increase voting safeguards. Yet, they are so focused on their one-party control that they don’t even consider what the voters want—and Illinoisans want to know their vote will be counted fairly and securely. But Democrats couldn’t even reach across the aisle to make election integrity a pillar of our voting process. Good government and governance starts at the top and under JB Pritzker’s leadership deficit, Illinois voters will experience another election with a lack of safeguards that promote integrity in the system.

I would have VETOED SB 536 because of the lack of election integrity safeguards. Integrity and trust must be restored in our elections.

I’ve asked what specific safeguards he was talking about, since he didn’t mention any. I’ll let you know.

…Adding… [The bill in this deleted update had been signed previously. Oops. Sorry about that.]

       

12 Comments
  1. - SaulGoodman - Tuesday, Nov 16, 21 @ 10:43 am:

    Schimpf: “I would have vetoed this bill because it didn’t do different things that weren’t in the bill.”

    Is he going to veto every election bill that doesn’t have “election integrity safeguards” in it?

    Is he going to veto every bill that doesn’t for some reason include something kind of related?


  2. - Fav Human - Tuesday, Nov 16, 21 @ 10:54 am:

    Campaign contributions from out-of-staters

    Which is usually considered a 1st amendment violation. I do think there is a 7th circuit case on this.

    Hope they made the clauses severable….


  3. - Flyin' Elvis'-Utah Chapter - Tuesday, Nov 16, 21 @ 10:57 am:

    The odds of Paul Schimpf having veto powers are slightly better than myself having veto powers.


  4. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Nov 16, 21 @ 11:09 am:

    ===I do think there is a 7th circuit case on this===

    Links would be helpful.


  5. - City Zen - Tuesday, Nov 16, 21 @ 11:11 am:

    Isn’t this how the campaign against Bill Conway was funded? There was a lot of dark money behind Kim Foxx’s primary campaign back then.

    On the “light” side of the ledger, Kilbride had a long line of personal injury law firms making 6-figure contributions to retain a judge. Would be nice to put more restrictions on attorneys as well.


  6. - Socially DIstant watcher - Tuesday, Nov 16, 21 @ 11:22 am:

    We don’t have an auditor general who has been found in violation of campaign finance laws. The PAC had deficiencies, but the candidate wasn’t responsible and the Board just dismissed the matter.

    That sound you hear is the air leaking out of this Republican talking point.


  7. - TheInvisibleMan - Tuesday, Nov 16, 21 @ 11:28 am:

    “This is so Illinois,” Batinick said

    Speaking of campaign finances, lets hear from Marks now former campaign treasurer. I’d love to see the audit done on his campaign finances.

    Or does his indictment prevent him from giving his opinion?


  8. - Fav Human - Tuesday, Nov 16, 21 @ 11:35 am:

    My bad- it was 9th circuit.

    https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/151-f-3d-1215-598141806

    151 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir. 1998), 95-35998, VanNatta v. Keisling


  9. - Wow - Tuesday, Nov 16, 21 @ 11:44 am:

    Oh. Look!! Another CapFax blog post about Republicans crying. That’s new!!!! LOL


  10. - Just Another Anon - Tuesday, Nov 16, 21 @ 12:02 pm:

    Here’s a more recent case (from the 8th Circuit) https://www.courthousenews.com/judge-curbs-south-dakota-political-contribution-law/


  11. - Pot calling kettle - Tuesday, Nov 16, 21 @ 1:34 pm:

    “So, we’re literally changing the law so he retroactively was no longer in violation of those laws.”

    The law was not retroactive.


  12. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Nov 16, 21 @ 2:03 pm:

    ===the New York City controlled media===

    The love of Pete, you’re in a roll today.

    Rich has this as a post, is he New York controller media too?

    To the post,

    ===“This is so Illinois,” Batinick said. “We have had an auditor general that has been found in violation of campaign finance laws. So, we’re literally changing the law so he retroactively was no longer in violation of those laws.”===

    This is wholly disingenuous and Batinick knows it.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Showcasing The Retailers Who Make Illinois Work
* Reader comments closed for the holidays
* And the winners are…
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Update to previous editions
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Report: Far-right Illinois billionaires may have skirted immigration rules
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards (Updated)
* Energy Storage Brings Cheaper Electricity, Greater Reliability
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller