Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » The SAFE-T Act’s future
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
The SAFE-T Act’s future

Tuesday, Nov 15, 2022 - Posted by Rich Miller

* WTAX

With the Illinois General Assembly back at the Capitol Tuesday, House Speaker Chris Welch (D-Hillside) lays out his expectation for one of the big issues, the “Safe-T Act.”

A key provision of that package, which passed almost two years ago, is the end of cash bail Jan. 1. Police and prosecutors have said their ability to catch and keep criminals will be severely hampered. If they are expecting lawmakers to use the veto session to overhaul the legislation, they are in for a disappointment.

“Certainly it’s a hope that we get clarifications done before we leave here in the second week of veto session,” which ends Dec. 1, Welch said. “I don’t think there’s a need for a big overhaul. We have already done three trailer bills that have been signed into law.”

Welch, about to enter his second two-year term as speaker, says the big issues – abortion, Safe-T, gun control – are delegated first to “working groups.” Those groups are all Democrats and not open to the public.

“One of the ways I manage the caucus is making sure that there is a consensus among us first,” said Welch. “The committee process will allow Republicans to be involved in it. After that, we’ll take it to the floor. (That process) has produced a whole lot of solid results.”

* Center Square

Jim Kaitschuck of the Illinois Sheriffs Association told The Center Square it could be a while before changes to the act are agreed upon even though lawmakers return this week.

“Our last conversation was last Wednesday, and we do not have a schedule to meet again, but that could change,” Kiatschuck said. “Lawmakers are only in session Tuesday and Wednesday, so in terms of something moving this week, I don’t think that’s remotely likely.”

Over the past few months, Republicans have called for a repeal of the measure, while Democrats have discussed further legislation. Kiatschuck said one idea is more realistic than the other.

“It’s a trailer bill is more likely,” Kaitschuck said. “Especially with the change of politics that has occurred, I do not see how a full repeal would occur.”

Many groups have spoken out against the measure, including the Illinois Sheriffs Association. Kaitschuck has been a part of the negotiations on the subject and said it’s all up to lawmakers now.

“We shed some light on the concerns we have, and states attorneys have and how we would address some of those things,” Kaitschuck said. “Ultimately, now the case has been presented now, it’s a matter of making a determination as to what the General Assembly is able to change or wants to change.”

       

7 Comments
  1. - Friendly Bob Adams - Tuesday, Nov 15, 22 @ 11:50 am:

    I think this is how it’s supposed to work. If something needs fixing, you fix it.


  2. - Norseman - Tuesday, Nov 15, 22 @ 11:59 am:

    When you go crazy on the rhetoric and fail, you better start focusing on being real. The goal of the reform must be realized. Now focus on implementation issues.


  3. - Socially DIstant watcher - Tuesday, Nov 15, 22 @ 12:50 pm:

    ==I do not see how a full repeal would occur==

    It’s always been about 30 & 60. They never had a plan that didn’t rely on huge Republican wins in the election and now there’s no path to repeal at all.


  4. - Larry Saunders - Tuesday, Nov 15, 22 @ 1:15 pm:

    Isn’t the SAFE-T Act a done deal? If the Court finds the Act “unconstitutional” December 15th, won’t the Dems cure the issue by simply reintroducing it and passing it again?


  5. - RNUG - Tuesday, Nov 15, 22 @ 1:20 pm:

    == Isn’t the SAFE-T Act a done deal? ==

    It’s a done deal but a number of legitimate concerns about language and implementation need to be addressed. Trailer bill #3 will hopefully do that.

    == won’t the Dems cure the issue by simply reintroducing it and passing it again? ==

    It doesn’t work that way. Unconstitutional is unconstitutional. They would have to remedy the issues the court found unconstitutional.


  6. - TheInvisibleMan - Tuesday, Nov 15, 22 @ 1:39 pm:

    –They would have to remedy the issues the court found unconstitutional.–

    This is going to immediately be appealed if the court finds any merit to their claims of it being unconstitutional. The injunctive relief decision will come even before the case is over.

    It’s likely going to be Grischow pt2, but this time it will be judge Cunnington.


  7. - cover - Tuesday, Nov 15, 22 @ 4:13 pm:

    = They would have to remedy the issues the court found unconstitutional. =

    If the courts toss the SAFE-T Act because it eliminates cash bail, then the General Assembly could just pass the bill again as-is except with the bail amount at $1 instead of $0.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Map shows historical decline of county populations, with about a third peaking between 1870 and 1900
* Question of the day
* 23 years after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Illinois remembers the lives lost
* IDOC responds to more Menard claims from Sen. Bryant
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Energy Storage Now!
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller