Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » The SAFE-T Act’s late December legal wrangling
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
The SAFE-T Act’s late December legal wrangling

Tuesday, Jan 3, 2023 - Posted by Isabel Miller

* If you need background, here you go

Click here for the Illinois Supreme Court’s order.

* The order was in response to this filing by DuPage County State’s Attorney Bob Berlin (R) and Kane County State’s Attorney Jamie Mosser (D)

Regardless of who is ultimately bound by the decision of the circuit court and the propriety of the decision on the merits, it is inevitable that on 12:01 a.m., January 1, 2023, there will be disparate methods of pretrial procedures occurring in jurisdictions across the State. Some jurisdictions consider themselves bound by the order of the Kankakee Circuit Court and proceed pursuant to current cash bail provisions; others will not and will proceed pursuant to the provisions of the Pretrial Fairness Act.

Movants are particularly sensitive to this problem as they have under their jurisdiction municipalities that span jurisdictions. For example, Naperville spans DuPage and Will Counties. Will County was a party to the lawsuit in Kankakee County, DuPage County was not. It is reasonable to anticipate that the counties will proceed differently on January 1, 2023. And Aurora spans four counties – DuPage, Kane, Kendall and Will – two of which were parties to the lawsuit and two of which were not. It is not an overstatement to describe the situation as chaotic.

Upon information and belief, at least three temporary restraining orders from counties not parties to the lawsuit have been granted.

These orders maintain the current status quo and do not allow the Pretrial Fairness Act to go into effect in those counties. […]

This Court should exercise its supervisory authority to enter an order sufficient to maintain consistent pretrial procedures because without such an order, defendants in different jurisdictions will be subject to different treatment upon arrest and throughout pretrial proceedings, creating an equal protection problem for citizens across the state.

* OK, let’s back up a bit. NBC Chicago

Kankakee County State’s Attorney James Rowe argued the law was too broad to meet so-called “single subject rule “of the Illinois Constitution. He said it also violated a constitutional provision that says “all persons shall be bailable by sufficient sureties,” insisting that Illinois judges should be allowed to set cash bail.

“The legislature, again, has put their hands on your gavel,” Rowe told Judge Thomas Cunnington.

* NEXSTAR on Dec. 29

Supporters of the SAFE-T Act are confident the Illinois Supreme Court will overturn the ruling, and cash bail will eventually be eliminated.

“While I am disappointed in the decision by the plaintiffs’ preferred trial court, I remain confident we will ultimately prevail on appeal,” House Speaker Emmanuel “Chris” Welch (D-Hillside) said in a statement.

The appeal process could take some time, and in the mean time, the ruling is causing confusion for the 37 counties that were not involved in the suit.

* Tribune after the Supreme Court stepped in

Lake County State’s Attorney Eric Rinehart, who supports the elimination of cash bail, said he was disappointed in Cunnington’s decision but said he understands why the Supreme Court ruled that uniformity in Illinois must exist. He’s argued that while the bail system can keep poor, nonviolent defendants locked up because they can’t afford to make bail, the system allows dangerous criminals to be released pending trial if they have the financial means.

“Lake County was ready to start arguing (Sunday) that violent offenders shouldn’t be able to use cash to buy their way out,” he said in a text message to the Tribune. “A few days ago, one of our defendants charged with possessing dozens of weapons and resisting law enforcement posted $75,000.

“Illinois will be safer when we join the federal courts in eliminating access to money as a factor in determining who is released,” Rinehart continued. “We were ready and will be ready when the Supreme Court reinstates (these provisions) later this year.”

In Cook County, officials were prepared to move ahead with the reform measures Sunday, even as the legal wrangling persisted.

* CBS 2

“It wasn’t surprising,” [Cook County Public Defender Sharone Mitchell Jr.] said. “There is a real value in ensuring the entire state is working off the same playbook.” […]

“It would not make sense with one courtroom over here, they were using cash bond – and another courtroom over there, they weren’t,” Mitchell said.

Mitchell calls the statewide playbook critical. So until the state Supreme Court reviews the law, it is as if the law never existed – and cash bond continues.

* WCIA

[Champaign County State’s Attorney Julia Rietz] said the court’s decision isn’t unexpected.

“It is a good thing, because we can’t have two different systems operating across the state,” Rietz said.

       

18 Comments
  1. - Homebody - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 10:09 am:

    == For example, Naperville spans DuPage and Will Counties. ==

    Another opportune time for me to state how stupid I think Illinois is when it comes to political subdivisions. Too many of them, weird overlaps, and none of the borders make sense.


  2. - Big Dipper - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 10:13 am:

    Because statutes carry a strong presumption of constitutionality, the Court should have done the opposite: stayed the circuit court’s order and let the statute go into effect in all 102 counties.


  3. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 10:34 am:

    It was good that the Supreme Court stayed enforcement of the PFA until review. I do not understand why the PFA opponents could not have raised these challenges in a more timely manner. The grounds always existed, and the opponents knew the law would become effective January 1, 2023. They always had standing.


  4. - PublicServant - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 11:30 am:

    Was the Cunningham order’s timing, days before the law was set to go into effect, just the natural result of the litigation taking time to wind its way through the system, or was it purposefully done to tweak the libs, and score a temporary victory for opponents of the law?


  5. - Jocko - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 11:39 am:

    All this posturing reminds me of the hysteria following legalized marijuana. Since 2014, did New Jersey and Alaska turn into dens of crime and no one told me?


  6. - Bezerk - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 11:47 am:

    Supporters of the SAFE-T Act are confident the Illinois Supreme Court will overturn the ruling, and cash bail will eventually be eliminated.

    Ummmm. Dem court, dem legislation..how you think they voters is going to go? Yes courts are mostly partisan these days.


  7. - Jilted - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 11:50 am:

    It will take a year of two to crunch numbers but if crime numbers dont dramatic ally improve under the safety act the pitch forks and torches will be out in full force


  8. - Lucky Pierre - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 12:30 pm:

    The Democratic Illinois Supreme Court should not be blinded by partisanship but by a commitment to upholding the the Illinois Constitution regardless of which party passed the law


  9. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 1:01 pm:

    ===but by a commitment to upholding the the Illinois Constitution regardless of which party passed the law===

    What specifically is unconstitutional?


  10. - Big Dipper - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 1:11 pm:

    LP, elections have consequences. Just as the country has been subjected to Dobbs and other erroneous decisions from Republican SCOTUS appointees, so shall your ilk be subjected to decisions that you disagree with.


  11. - Lucky Pierre - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 1:17 pm:

    Judge Thomas Cunnington ruled in a 33 page opinion the Illinois constitution requires the separation of powers and the “appropriateness of bail resides in the judicial branch and cannot be ended by legislative fiat”

    I wouldn’t be surprised if the Illinois Supreme Court upholds tbe law that it is challenged by the US Supreme Court.


  12. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 1:22 pm:

    ===Judge Thomas Cunnington ruled in a 33 page opinion the Illinois constitution requires the separation of powers and the “appropriateness of bail resides in the judicial branch and cannot be ended by legislative fiat”===

    What is the definition of bail.

    I believe Rich revisited this definition.

    Should we go over that definition here?


  13. - Norseman - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 1:25 pm:

    === The Democratic Illinois Supreme Court should not be blinded by partisanship but by a commitment to upholding the the (sic) Illinois Constitution regardless of which party passed the law ===

    True, as should the local judges who are the initial triers of fact. (Or makers of fiction in this case.)

    However, this judge has chosen to a ridiculous interpretation of the IL Constitution. If bail has to be $, why can defendants be released on their own recognizance now under IL law? Furthermore, how can existing bail laws be constitutional, although this guy considers the SAFE-T Act to be a usurpation of the powers of the judiciary. Even this partisan judge didn’t go along with the SA’s procedural arguments. (The enrolled bill rule is strong with the courts.)


  14. - Big Dipper - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 1:26 pm:

    SCOTUS doesn’t challenge laws lol.


  15. - Big Dipper - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 1:30 pm:

    Further the Illinois Supreme Court has the final say on the interpretation of the state constitution.


  16. - Deputy Sheriff - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 3:35 pm:

    Unlawful Restraint is a non-detainable offense of the SAFE-T Act. What a wonderful world we live in!


  17. - Amalia - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 5:01 pm:

    really good to have uniformity of application of the law so smart to stay this. the tweaking process also gives everyone more time to think about how things are going in all facets of the criminal justice process. you can state that murder numbers are down, but wow, those other crime stats detailed in the Sun Times. I’m also fascinated by the Gierach theory that taking away weed sales means criminals are looking elsewhere to make money. fascinating.


  18. - Rabid - Tuesday, Jan 3, 23 @ 10:18 pm:

    The powers that be want bail. Is the argument for themselves or the accused ?


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Showcasing The Retailers Who Make Illinois Work
* Reader comments closed for the holidays
* And the winners are…
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Update to previous editions
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Report: Far-right Illinois billionaires may have skirted immigration rules
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards (Updated)
* Energy Storage Brings Cheaper Electricity, Greater Reliability
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller