Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Illinois Supreme Court will hear consolidated pension funds case
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Illinois Supreme Court will hear consolidated pension funds case

Wednesday, May 31, 2023 - Posted by Isabel Miller

* Background is here if you need it. Pensions & Investments

The Illinois Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments regarding the constitutionality of two new consolidated investment funds combining the assets of the state’s municipal police and firefighters’ pension funds.

The decision by the state’s Supreme Court follows the February ruling by an Illinois appellate court that the consolidated funds, the $9 billion Illinois Police Officers’ Pension Investment Fund, Peoria, and the $7.2 billion Illinois Firefighters’ Pension Investment Fund, Lombard, are constitutional.

In that ruling affirming the May 2022 decision by Kane County Circuit Court Judge Robert K. Villa that the law creating the consolidated funds was not unconstitutional under the Illinois Constitution’s pension and takings clauses, the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District in Elgin, said “while plaintiffs have a constitutional right to receive pension benefits … they have no right to the investments held by the funds; rather, they are entitled only to present or future payments from the funds.”

The February 2021 lawsuit filed in Kane County by the boards of 16 municipal police pension funds and two firefighters pension funds, along with some participants from each fund, alleged the law had violated Illinois Constitution clauses by terminating “plaintiffs’ authority to exclusively manage and control their investment expenditures and income,” according to the original court filing.

* Kane County Circuit Court Judge Robert Villa upheld the consolidated pensions law in May 2022 and an appellate court affirmed the decision earlier this year. Bond Buyer

Daniel Konicek of Konicek & Dillon represents the police funds.

“We disagree from our standpoint that our people have a vested interest in this because their life savings are involved and they feel their right to vote and control” how their hard-earned contributions are invested is a protected benefit, Konicek said of the court rulings so far.

The plaintiffs argued that benefits are damaged because the law “strips plaintiffs of their autonomy and their authority” on investment decisions. The plaintiffs argued the law violates the pension protection clause, the contract clause and the takings clause of the state constitution.

The state countered that fund management doesn’t enjoy the same status as “benefits” with
constitutional protections.

Circuit court Judge Villa, in his ruling, sided with the state, saying he could not extend the term benefits beyond the reach of prior Illinois Supreme Court cases to find the challenge legislation unconstitutional against the pension clause’s protections.

       

13 Comments
  1. - cover - Wednesday, May 31, 23 @ 9:29 am:

    How soon will the legislature seek to eliminate the local pension fund boards themselves and make these consolidated funds work like the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF)?


  2. - Anyone Remember - Wednesday, May 31, 23 @ 9:50 am:

    Apparently those local pension board training sessions in Wisconsin must really be something.


  3. - RNUG - Wednesday, May 31, 23 @ 11:12 am:

    Fully expect the ILSC to uphold / affirm the lower courts.

    The legislation changed nothing in terms of benefits for the employees / retirees. The only takings that is occurring is removing some cushy positions / non-pension related benefits from a few people.


  4. - Retired SURS Employee - Wednesday, May 31, 23 @ 11:41 am:

    I fully agree with RNUG, although as someone who specializes in this area of the law, I must admit that I did not think that the Kanerva decision would come out the way it did.


  5. - Back to the Future - Wednesday, May 31, 23 @ 11:55 am:

    In the minority here, but I appreciate the local pension funds position.
    I did see Brad Cole, a lobbyist for Municipal folks, was quoted in the Pensions article. Not sure it is a particularly good idea to have a paid lobbyist on a board where he votes to hire vendors. Apparently Board members have issues with Mr. Cole in that the Police Board members rejected his effort to be elected an officer of that Board.
    On simple tasks like preparing investment returns during the Brad Cole term it was reported at the 3/31 meeting that the performance numbers had to be rerun due to pricing issues. Cole is supposed to be a fiduciary for the police members and the fact that under his term of office the vendors and staff can not figure out returns would seem to be a problem.
    Of course, I suspect he thinks things are fine, but the lobbyist connection seems odd and the inability to figure how the fund is performing should trouble him.


  6. - Chris - Wednesday, May 31, 23 @ 12:40 pm:

    They can’t have it both ways: both (1) guaranteed as to amount of benefit and obligation of the government to pay, and (2) control over how the funds are invested.

    Whoever bears the risk, should have the control.

    Pick a lane, gents.


  7. - Merica - Wednesday, May 31, 23 @ 1:42 pm:

    Does everyone understand the two underlying issues?

    1. These boards want to have their own interpretations to give out more generous benefits than may be due;

    2. These boards have few ethical duties/ oversight between board members and investments. if it was transparent, you’d likely see many relationships between both sides. Always a cause for concern.


  8. - Back to the Future - Wednesday, May 31, 23 @ 2:06 pm:

    Merica raises an important point.
    Board members and Vendors should have to disclose any financial payments the vendors made to any organization that the Board member is employed by or served as an officer or Detector.
    For example, the lobbyist on these boards is working for an organization that offers “Sponsorship Opportunities” on their webpage. If applicable, any votes for vendors that are writing checks should be disclosed if the Board Member is voting to give a contract to that vendor. That kind of disclosure would not prohibit the Biard Member from voting gir a particular vendor , but it would address Merica’s idea.
    I don’t mean to be picking on anyone, but transparency in government is a good goal. Unfortunately that will probably never happen in Illinois.


  9. - Anonymous - Wednesday, May 31, 23 @ 2:52 pm:

    Back to the Future - Brad Cole was integral in negotiating the statute which created the combined investment funds. The statute specifically states that IML will hold a position on the Boards and Brad has been appointed by IML as their representative. This makes absolute sense since he was part of the drafting process and understands the legislation inside/out. He is there to represent municipal interests.


  10. - Back to the Future - Wednesday, May 31, 23 @ 3:29 pm:

    Anonymous
    I get your point, but isn’t the job of a pension fund trustee to represent the interests of the employees, the retirees and the dependents.
    Being a lobbyist for a group would seem to lead to conflicts with basic fiduciary standards.


  11. - DuPage - Wednesday, May 31, 23 @ 3:55 pm:

    @9:29am:===make these consolidated funds work like the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF)?===

    The IMRF makes employers pay their money into the IMRF pension fund right away. If the other funds were paid the same way, there would be no massive backlog pension debts.


  12. - Stanley - Wednesday, May 31, 23 @ 5:36 pm:

    Does everyone understand the two underlying issues?

    1. These boards want to have their own interpretations to give out more generous benefits than may be due;

    2. These boards have few ethical duties/ oversight between board members and investments. if it was transparent, you’d likely see many relationships between both sides. Always a cause for concern.

    1. Boards follow the known interpretation of the law. They follow the same guidelines that other municipal boards must follow when issuing decisions.
    2. Board members are required to submit Statement of Economic Interests on an annual basis.


  13. - RNUG - Thursday, Jun 1, 23 @ 9:45 am:

    == did not think that the Kanerva decision would come out the way it did. ==

    I did, but I expected them to decide on strictly contract law, as opposed to invoking the pension clause.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the holidays
* And the winners are…
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Update to previous editions
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Report: Far-right Illinois billionaires may have skirted immigration rules
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards (Updated)
* Energy Storage Brings Cheaper Electricity, Greater Reliability
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller