Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Safety worries rise over Illinois CO2 pipeline project
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Safety worries rise over Illinois CO2 pipeline project

Monday, Jul 24, 2023 - Posted by Isabel Miller

* Tribune

[A]s the Midwest considers the health and safety issues raised by proposals to build massive new carbon dioxide pipeline projects, including Omaha-based Navigator CO2′s 1,350-mile network spanning Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska and South Dakota.

The projects aim to prevent planet-warming CO2 from entering the atmosphere by capturing it during industrial processes, compressing it into a fluid, transporting it in steel pipelines and injecting it deep underground into naturally occurring rock formations where it will be trapped — ideally for thousands of years.

Navigator says this can be done safely and points to thousands of miles of CO2 pipeline already in use in the United States, mostly by the oil industry, which uses carbon dioxide to boost production.

But opponents, including environmentalists and landowners, say a new generation of massive, climate-oriented CO2 pipeline projects such as Navigator’s should be put on hold until government officials can address “alarming” gaps in health and safety regulations.

Among the gaps:

    - There is no state or federal limit on how close pipelines carrying a potentially suffocating gas can be placed to a home, school or hospital.

    - There is no requirement that an odorant be added to the CO2 to alert the public to a leak, as is done with natural gas.

    - There is no limit on the impurities that are allowed in the carbon dioxide, despite the potential for pipeline corrosion and health hazards in the event of a leak.

    - There is no requirement that pipeline companies use a specific method to map potential accident hazard zones, although one standard approach — which failed in Mississippi — doesn’t take complex topography into account.

* A Carbon leak in Mississippi prompted federal focus on pipeline safety the AP reported in April…

Transportation regulators entered into a federal order with a carbon dioxide pipeline company three years after its pipeline ruptured in a lower Mississippi Delta town, prompting the evacuation of hundreds and sending dozens of people to the hospital.

Over 40 people received hospital treatment, and more than 300 were evacuated on Feb. 22, 2020, after Denbury Gulf Coast Pipelines’ 24-inch (61-centimeter) Delta Pipeline ruptured in Satartia, Mississippi. It released over 31,000 barrels of CO2. Residents who were sent to the hospital had symptoms of C02 poisoning and oxygen deprivation, according to a news release published by Pipeline Safety Trust, an advocacy group.

The Department of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration announced Thursday that it had entered into the order with Denbury, a Texas-based company.

The order will require the company to meet compliance requirements, such as communicating with all first responders who would be responsible for responding to a pipeline incident. Denbury has already paid a $2.8 million penalty, the release said.

“We hope that the consequences Denbury faces as a result of its failure to protect the public prevents devastating incidents like this one from occurring in the future,” said Kenneth Clarkson, communications director for Pipeline Safety Trust.

* Another story from the Tribune

One day last fall, Sabrina and Ralph Jones spotted four wooden surveyor stakes in the farm field across the street, each one marked with a strip of orange plastic.

That, the Joneses say, was their only warning that Navigator CO2 — an Omaha-based company that wants to store millions of tons of carbon dioxide underground in central Illinois — was planning to drill a testing well just 500 feet from their front door.

There was no letter from Navigator, according to the Jones, who live on a quiet country road in Nokomis, 200 miles southwest of Chicago. There was no phone call or visit. But for more than two months, starting in early May, the drilling operation filled their leafy front yard with a dull industrial hum, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. […]

At a time when Navigator needs to cultivate the support of landowners and public bodies, some observers say the company doesn’t appear to be doing itself any favors. Running a 24-hour industrial operation near a residence is legal in Montgomery County, where Nokomis is located, because there are no zoning laws or noise ordinances, according to county board Chair Doug Donaldson. But opponents say it’s not the best way to win over your neighbors.

* State Journal-Register

As a public meeting Monday evening revealed, finding common ground on a multi-state carbon dioxide pipeline running through Sangamon County remains a problem both figuratively and literally.

Coming to Springfield from Nebraska, Navigator Heartland Greenway LLC attempted to sell a standing room audience on its proposed pipeline running through 292 miles in the state. That task has proven difficult in preceding months and the meeting held by the county Zoning and Land Use Committee continued that trend.

Approximately 39 miles of pipeline collecting emissions from ethanol plants and storing them underground would run through the county, hitting portions of nine townships. Opponents are concerned a potential pipeline burst with this proximity to towns such as New Berlin and Glenarm could lead to a public health crisis exceeding what was seen earlier this year during the I-55 dust storm.

This fear, along with belief that existing state and federal regulations are inadequate, has caused several counties to issue moratoriums against CO2 pipeline construction. As of June, Navigator has also only received 13.4% of the right-of-way easement agreements statewide and 5.2% in the county according to its own data. […]

Most of Navigator’s presentation focused on its safety efforts for the pipeline, where in addition to 24/7 monitoring and a lockdown system that would prevent a burst from spreading further up or down the line, there will be bi-weekly air monitoring by plane or drone to check in for any weather disruptions.

* Journal Courier

Sen. Steve McClure. R-Springfield, wants to suspend issuance of any new certificates of authority for building carbon dioxide pipelines as well as pause applications for the certificates for two years or until the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration revises federal safety standards for transporting carbon dioxide.

The two-year time limit on the bill is intended to give either the federal administration or the state enough time to enact their own regulations, McClure said. […]

Other state lawmakers from both political parties have expressed concern about carbon capture pipelines, McClure said, whose legislation is being co-sponsored by Sens. Sally J. Turner, R-Lincoln, and Rachel Ventura, D-Joliet.

“Something this massive … we’ve got to make sure it’s safe,” he said. “That’s a key concern for people across this state that are affected, whether they’re Democrats or Republicans.”

The bill failed to make it out of Senate Assignments during session.

       

18 Comments
  1. - DuPage - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 11:39 am:

    There are not only safety concerns, but also financial questions of long-term responsibility. Who will be responsible to deal with problems later on? Who will pay for the costs if the dump starts leaking years later? Illinois should not assume responsibility for this.
    https://insideclimatenews.org/news/26042022/carbon-capture-storage-safety-liability/?utm_source=InsideClimate+News&utm_campaign=092c0ab704-&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_29c928ffb5-092c0ab704-329529685


  2. - DuPage Saint - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 11:39 am:

    Montgomery County has no zoning laws or noise ordinances? I did not know this could be possible. Do you can build anything anywhere? I guess that is a small government persons dream


  3. - Amalia - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 11:49 am:

    good lord those poor people. how can there be no notice to adjacent neighbors? ah, Counties, leave them alone. example one. change.


  4. - BluegrassBoy - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 12:00 pm:

    NIMBY.This just helps keep ethanol plants producing longer that they should. Just google simulated CO2 pipleine rupture. Its terrifying. I went to the public meeting and hope Sangamon Co rejects it. 50 million isnt worth the chance of a catestophic disaster. This industry needs significant regualtion if we want to build CO2 pipelines in the US.


  5. - TheInvisibleMan - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 12:14 pm:

    This is the same type of discussion which will/should eventually start happening with the gassification plant that state passed a law to be build in Will/Grundy county.

    Recent studies have shown that these facilities massively increase the amount of microplastics in the local environment, because they water they use in the plants goes back into the treatment process where these microplastics are not able to be removed.


  6. - H-W - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 12:14 pm:

    I just do not see how you can pump a liquid gas into the ground, in the moving tectonic plates, and not assume that at some point, the gas will be released.


  7. - Anotheretiree - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 12:17 pm:

    Cant find the exact route but I think its within 2-3 miles so not a big fan. Amazed that Sangamon County GOP’ers now seem to want regulation ? I thought the miracle of the marketplace solved all problems ?


  8. - The Truth - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 12:24 pm:

    Montgomery County has no zoning laws or noise ordinances? I did not know this could be possible. Do you can build anything anywhere? I guess that is a small government persons dream

    I’m guessing they could use a little bit of Big Gubmint right about now


  9. - OneMan - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 12:34 pm:

    == I just do not see how you can pump a liquid gas into the ground, in the moving tectonic plates, and not assume that at some point, the gas will be release ==

    https://www.nicorgas.com/company/where-we-are/our-service-area/underground-storage.html

    https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/10.1144/SP528-2022-85


  10. - Normally just a reader - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 12:39 pm:

    I am normally just a reader, not a commenter, but I needed to comment today. In response to the no zoning laws or noise ordinances; Edwards County also has neither. We do have building permits, but they are just a piece of paper with no fees. There are a handful or ordinances on the books including one for solar farms and one for wind farms; but in general, if you own the land, you can do what you want when you want and lease to whomever you want for whatever purpose.


  11. - NoMoreMC - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 12:56 pm:

    Like OneMan linked to, we have about a trillion cubic feet of natural gas stored underground which is brought in on pipelines. I believe we are still second only to Michigan on total capacity. We’ve been doing it since the 50s-60s. However, it isn’t all roses. There have been leaks, and those wells aren’t even at the century mark. Keeping a gas/liquid underground for thousands of years when man-made wels and piping are involved seems like a big ask. Illinois has been at the forefront of underground storage for a long time and the Geological Survey has great expertise on the burgeoning field of CO2 storage, but the idea still scares me. Especially without more federal oversight. Google the Aliso Canyon gas leak. Now substitute CO2 for natural gas. Doesn’t sound like a great idea. With natural gas, the utilities have a vested interest in keeping the gas in the ground so they can sell it later. With carbon sequestration there is no interest. This is pure disposal. If the reservoir is full and the company is on their 3rd LLC, what do they care if you have a few leaks? They already made their money. For this to work, you need longterm bonding and other protections. Just don’t see that happening anytime soon.


  12. - TNR - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 1:21 pm:

    Lots of legitimate concerns here, but pipelines are by far the safest way to transport hazardous materials, as opposed to rail, road and barge. And even if we completely convert energy production to renewable sources, there are still plenty of industrial carbon emitters to be dealt with. Finding a way to capture and sequester carbon is well worth exploring. ADM has been doing it successfully and safely in Decatur for years.


  13. - Anon221 - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 2:10 pm:

    At least as it concerns the Navigator project- In presentations they have given, it appears that they are more interested in establishing “terminals” with other businesses along the way that would use the CO2 for other purposes, and then just use McLean, DeWitt (planned for “Phase 2″), Montgomery, and Christian for the final dumping ground of anything they can’t sell off the pipeline(s)- including laterals they say are planned for “Phase 2″. For additional information that may or may not be presented to the ICC (because, according to Navigator, these are “separate” permitting tracks), you can go to this link and see all the areas that Class VI wells are currently being applied for. Interestingly, Montgomery County is not included. And, I haven’t found any well permits from IDNR for this type of drilling going back on the permit logs to the week of 2-07-2022. Still looking, but if USEPA didn’t approve it, and IDNR didn’t permit it, who DOES ensure that a well such as this one in Montgomery County is safely done? And, BTW, the IEPA application for an NPDES permit for the drilling site is listed as “Kim Brown Well Site”. That’s the name of the landowner, not Navigator. Just another way to avoid transparency of any kind to the public. https://www.epa.gov/uic/class-vi-permit-applications-region-5


  14. - froganon - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 2:19 pm:

    Until pipelines are built and maintained over time with stringent federal, state and local regulation as well as serious liability for operators, forget new ones. Fix existing lines, beef up new construction and operation. Until then, plant every inch of ag. land in the midwest, the country and the world with cover crops. Plant trees and/or prairie on every inch of bare land along roads and near buildings. Those plants will immediately pull carbon out of the air and store it in their root systems. Put solar panels on every available roof and over every parking lot. We have the tools to sequester carbon (plants) and the tools to stop releasing it into the air. The heat is on…literally. It’s our choice to save ourselves or keep burning fossil fuels.


  15. - Nobody Sent - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 2:35 pm:

    In response to One Man: https://www.wcia.com/news/clear-and-present-danger-the-leak/


  16. - Galena Guy - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 3:08 pm:

    I tend to side with Bluegrass Boy on the subject. Living 10 minutes from Dubuque, I get awfully sick and tired of that that senile windbag Chuck Grassley rave about the benefits of ethanol when it really is an environmental nightmare. The thing that gets me most about this whole pipeline debacle is the apparent hypocrisy of corn farmers not wanting CO2 pipelines traversing their property. They KNEW the corn was going to be used for ethanol production but don’t want to deal with or be burdened with the byproduct of their wares. Isn’t this kinda why the EPA was created - to keep producers from ignoring the hazardous byproduct of their product?


  17. - Anon221 - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 3:39 pm:

    Amalia- This might apply in this situation, and it is state law, so counties can’t be stricter than that setback. And, it’s not enough. The exploratory oil drilling that took place across from my property ran for 10 days, 24/7, and was about 900 feet from my home. I can’t imagine having to live with that noise, vibration, and (possibly) diesel fumes for as long as the Jones’ have been. Ten nights of severe sleep deprivation was 10 nights too many. Months on end would drive my crazy. As far as I know, as long as the drilling is outside the setback, absolutely no notice needs to be made to any surrounding landowners or homeowners. I will stand corrected if anyone knows otherwise.

    “f) All new well locations shall not be less than 200 feet from the nearest occupied dwelling existing at the time the permit application is filed with the Department, unless the permittee obtains a written agreement with the surface owner upon which the dwelling is located specifically allowing for a closer well location.

    (Source: Amended at 45 Ill. Reg. 13907, effective October 25, 2021)”

    https://www.ilga.gov/commission/jcar/admincode/062/062002400D04100R.html


  18. - Dotnonymous x - Monday, Jul 24, 23 @ 4:55 pm:

    The company claims it’s safe, where on Earth have I heard that before?

    You can bury it…but you can’t hide it…from Mother Nature.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* A programming note
* Showcasing The Retailers Who Make Illinois Work
* Handful of Republican House members call inauguration 'political theater,' stage counter-programming stunt (Updated x2)
* CUB urges rejection of Nicor's $309 million rate hike request
* Roundup: Madigan takes the witness stand
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson denies any conflict with Gov. Pritzker, sidesteps 'blindsided' question
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
January 2025
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller