Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » It’s just a bill
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
It’s just a bill

Thursday, Sep 21, 2023 - Posted by Isabel Miller

* Rep. Dan Ugaste…

On Tuesday, State Representative Dan Ugaste (R-Geneva) introduced a resolution urging a vote in the House of Representatives and Senate on legislation to make the Invest in Kids Program in Illinois permanent. House Resolution 412 urges the General Assembly to take a vote on removing the sunset provision currently in the Invest in Kids Act during the 2023 fall veto session.

“It’s common knowledge that when we invest in children and education, we reap the rewards for generations, and we need to take action when we are falling behind on these key statistics,” said Rep. Ugaste. “Currently, we are last in the nation for state economies with the most racial equality and we need to address and fix this problem. We need to make certain that we are providing equal opportunity for everybody in Illinois and that begins with action in the General Assembly. We need a straight up and down vote, not an amendment to another bill, on this critical issue. This sunset needs to be removed so we can provide more opportunities for education in Illinois.”

Rep. Ugaste referenced a 2023 study from WalletHub of the state economies with the most racial equality, where Illinois was ranked 50th out of 50 states. According to the Illinois State Board of Education, in 2021-2022, student reading proficiency rates were 30% and student math proficiency rates were 26%. Illinois public school enrollment made a nearly 7.5% drop from the 2018-2019 school year.

The Invest in Kids Scholarship Tax Credit Program was enacted in 2017. It offers a 75% income tax credit to individuals and businesses that contribute to qualified Scholarship Granting Organizations (SGOs). These SGOs then provide scholarships for families meeting income requirements to attend non-public schools and technical academies in Illinois. The Invest in Kids Act is scheduled to be repealed on January 1st, 2025.

Rep. Ugaste is a co-sponsor of two bills to extend the Invest in Kids repeal date or remove it altogether to make the program permanent. Rep. Ugaste is a member of the Opportunity Caucus, which is focused on multiple bills to enact real education reform, among other issues.

* Here’s the House Resolution from Rep. Ugaste

Urges the General Assembly to take a vote on removing the sunset from the Invest in Kids Act during the upcoming Veto Session and make it possible for these students to continue their educations.

* WAND

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois continues to advertise and sell health plans that fail to meet network adequacy standards in Central Illinois. Local lawmakers are furious that thousands of people still can’t see their Springfield Clinic doctors and specialists.

Eighteen months have gone by and patients are still facing the same issue. The Blue Cross directory continues to show 98 Springfield Clinic providers as in-network when they are not. […]

[Rep. Sue Scherer] has filed a bill to create transparency and harsher penalties for any insurance companies violating network adequacy standards. Her plan could require insurance groups to report any changes to their approved network plans within 15 days. Companies would face a $1,000 each day they fail to submit updated network plans.

House Bill 4126 also states that the agency’s director may prohibit network plans from being used or renewed within a county until the department determines the insurance network is adequate again. Insurers failing to update their network plan directories could face civil penalties of $5,000 per month. Scherer also believes insurance companies should audit their print and online directories for accuracy and make necessary corrections at least once every 90 days. […]

She explained the Pritzker administration and Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch’s Chief of Staff agree that the ghost networks must be stopped as soon as possible. Scherer would like to see her bill moved during veto session this fall rather than shelving the plan for the 2024 spring session.

* WAND

Illinois Senate Republicans are pushing for new regulations to protect minors from harmful consequences of social media addiction. […]

“Repeated research demonstrates how social media platforms are intentionally crafted to foster addiction, promote detrimental habits, and aggravate issues such as anxiety, depression, eating disorders and feelings of inadequacy,” said Sen. Sue Rezin (R-Morris). […]

Although, some are worried the plan could lead to unintended consequences for any business operating on the internet. TechNet, which represents nearly 100 innovative companies, argues that this bill contains vague requirements that provide little or no clarity on compliance with a broad impact.

“The bill does not define what a business or business entity is,” said Tyler Diers, Midwest Executive Director for TechNet. “So, think for a second about all of the websites that are likely to be accessed by a child and then think about how these websites must have the best interest of the child in mind. That would include all major news outlets, the websites of every major sports league, most online magazines and podcast channels.”

* Rep Nabeela Syed filed HB4142

Amends the Genetic Information Privacy Act. Provides that an insurer may not seek information derived from genetic testing for use in connection with a policy of life insurance. Provides that an insurer may consider the results of genetic testing in connection with a policy of life insurance if the individual voluntarily submits the results and the results are favorable to the individual. Amends the Illinois Insurance Code. Provides that an insurer must comply with the provisions of the Genetic Information Privacy Act in connection with the amendment, delivery, issuance, or renewal of a life insurance policy; claims for or denial of coverage under a life insurance policy; or the determination of premiums or rates under a life insurance policy.

* WTTW

A new ordinance introduced to the Chicago City Council by Ald. Brian Hopkins (2nd Ward) last Thursday would restrict sales of hemp products. Under Hopkins’ proposal, hemp products, like delta-8, could only be sold in licensed marijuana dispensaries.[…]

State Rep. LaShawn Ford, D-Chicago, is drafting alternate legislation that would create a regulatory structure similar to cannabis. It would limit sales to 21 and over, create rigorous testing and labeling requirements and impose a new tax on hemp products.

Unlike Hopkins’ ordinance, the state legislation would not mandate hemp products be sold in licensed marijuana dispensaries. Ford prefers that the state create a separate hemp permit for businesses who want to sell hemp products, in addition to allowing hemp to be sold in marijuana dispensaries. […]

Ford doesn’t think banning delta-8 makes sense.

“We want to regulate it so it’s safe, clean and revenue can be generated from it. Baffles me that we would want to ban something we can’t get rid of, during a time when we need revenue,” Ford said. “Let’s put this under control of the government so our streets are safe and it’s taxed.”

* Rep. Dave Vella filed HB4143 yesterday

Amends the Unemployment Insurance Act. Provides that an individual shall be ineligible for benefits for a period totaling and not to exceed 2 weeks (rather than an individual shall be ineligible for benefits for any week) with respect to which it is found that his total or partial unemployment is due to a stoppage of work which exists because of a labor dispute at the factory, establishment, or other premises at which he is or was last employed. Provides that, after the 2 week period, the individual will be eligible for benefits.

* HR409

Mourns the passing of former Illinois State Representative and Assistant Minority Leader William B. “Bill” Black of Danville.

       

20 Comments
  1. - Donnie Elgin - Thursday, Sep 21, 23 @ 1:24 pm:

    Ugaste Resolution….

    ” WHEREAS, Chicago Teachers Union President Stacy Davis Gates, someone directly involved in the quality of public education, has elected to send one of her children to a private institution”


  2. - Henry - Thursday, Sep 21, 23 @ 1:32 pm:

    A $5,000 a month fine isn’t going to incentivize insurance companies to do anything. If you really want them to keep their databases updated, then a better approach would be to force them to cover listed providers as in network.


  3. - Oswego Willy - Thursday, Sep 21, 23 @ 1:32 pm:

    ===“It’s common knowledge that when we invest in children and education, we reap the rewards for generations, and we need to take action when we are falling behind on these key statistics,” said Rep. Ugaste. “Currently, we are last in the nation for state economies with the most racial equality and we need to address and fix this problem. We need to make certain that we are providing equal opportunity for everybody in Illinois and that begins with action in the General Assembly. We need a straight up and down vote, not an amendment to another bill, on this critical issue. This sunset needs to be removed so we can provide more opportunities for education in Illinois.”===

    Now… make that about public education.

    Not one thing is preventing altruistic donors to giving to kids to go to private schools. I’ve looked.

    Invest in Kids is about propping up private education where they can discriminate to whom can attend and decide with testing who can continue to learn there. Invest in Kids is about the tax breaks first, the kids last, as the necessity of the tax break is so necessary… not one person has decided to fundraise away from the program to keep monies in these schools.

    It’s utterly phony that “it isn’t about the money”… for the tax breaks, for the schools… and the students are the vessels to funnel tax break cash to schools needing that money.

    It’s terrible policy masquerading as “altruistic educational freedom”

    Let it end, let’s see the fundraising be the anger, not the carrot-ing tax breaks.


  4. - Roman - Thursday, Sep 21, 23 @ 1:49 pm:

    I think OW made a similar observation last week, so pardon me if this is repetitive. But I have to wonder what is Ugaste’s goal? Is it to help the kids you claim to be concerned with and actually pass a bill? Or is it to get social media likes by “owning the libs?”

    If it’s the latter, you’re doing great. If it’s the former, you are doing it wrong.


  5. - Just Me 2 - Thursday, Sep 21, 23 @ 1:58 pm:

    I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a House Resolution that urges its own body to do something.


  6. - Ducky LaMoore - Thursday, Sep 21, 23 @ 2:18 pm:

    “The Blue Cross directory continues to show 98 Springfield Clinic providers as in-network when they are not”

    I am a very active detractor of Blue Cross. The database is always wrong. I had to walk into four clinics that were all supposedly part of the network to find one that actually was. The customer service was rude and generally horrible. And then they stopped taking credit cards for premium payments. I told the dude I was just going to cancel if they wouldn’t take my credit card. He wouldn’t, so I did. I’ve had so much better luck with Health Alliance and Aetna. I would never ever recommend Blue Cross to my worst enemy.


  7. - JS Mill - Thursday, Sep 21, 23 @ 2:32 pm:

    =“It’s common knowledge that when we invest in children and education, we reap the rewards for generations, and we need to take action when we are falling behind on these key statistics,” =

    OW hits ths out of the park. GOVERNMENT invests in schools through public schools not private and parochial schools. That is a foundational American principle predating the revolution.

    Some people just don’t seem to love America.


  8. - Donnie Elgin - Thursday, Sep 21, 23 @ 2:48 pm:

    “GOVERNMENT invests in schools through public schools not private and parochial schools. That is a foundational American principle predating the revolution.”

    SCOTUS decisions to the contrary…

    Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn,
    “Ultimately, the Supreme Court found that any damages or harm claimed by the taxpayers by virtue of simply being a taxpayer would be pure speculation because the issue at hand was a tax credit and not a government expenditure”

    Zelman v. Simmons-Harris

    “declared that the school voucher program was not in violation of the Establishment Clause…also deemed that government support for religion was constitutional if it did not occur de jure but de facto and also failed to specify or to encourage religious schools”


  9. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Sep 21, 23 @ 2:56 pm:

    ===SCOTUS decisions ===

    Illinois Constitution…

    SECTION 3. PUBLIC FUNDS FOR SECTARIAN PURPOSES FORBIDDEN Neither the General Assembly nor any county, city, town, township, school district, or other public corporation, shall ever make any appropriation or pay from any public fund whatever, anything in aid of any church or sectarian purpose, or to help support or sustain any school, academy, seminary, college, university, or other literary or scientific institution, controlled by any church or sectarian denomination whatever; nor shall any grant or donation of land, money, or other personal property ever be made by the State, or any such public corporation, to any church, or for any sectarian purpose.


  10. - 47th Ward - Thursday, Sep 21, 23 @ 2:58 pm:

    Of the bills listed above, I’m guessing HR409 has the best chance of passage.

    ===But I have to wonder what is Ugaste’s goal?===

    Constituent management/donor relations?


  11. - Oswego Willy - Thursday, Sep 21, 23 @ 3:02 pm:

    - Roman -

    There was talk to that, I too can’t remember to the specific thought I had. If you like, claim it.

    The fundraising and donor list aspect of the resolution is par for the course where votes are more difficult to find. One angle, for sure.


  12. - Norseman - Thursday, Sep 21, 23 @ 3:29 pm:

    OW & JS has it covered on my thoughts on Ugaste.

    There are several things to say about the Senate MAGA GOP social media bill.

    - The MAGA GOP wants to impose a regulatory, but refuses to pay for them when the bill comes.

    - it’s interesting to see the hypocrisy of the MAGA GOP to be concerned about the social media impact on kids and want government intervention, while they don’t want any government involvement in correcting lies and misinformation that adversely impacts the health and wellbeing of all society.

    - State level regulation of a multi-national media company doesn’t make sense. Especially when the MAGA GOP doesn’t like to pay for them.


  13. - Huckleberry1926 - Thursday, Sep 21, 23 @ 3:53 pm:

    As one who pays taxes, a deduction for charitable contributions is between 12% and 40% of a taxpayer’s income depending on the taxpayer’s income tax bracket. A SEVENTY-FIVE percent tax credit (of the final tax owed) comes off the total tax bill. Last I checked, 75% > 12% to 40%. Schooling, it’s basic math.


  14. - Illiana - Thursday, Sep 21, 23 @ 4:22 pm:

    @Norseman

    The social media bill is essentially the exact same bill that California recently passed into law. Now, that law is facing a pretty steep legal battle and you can disagree with the idea of states trying to regulate multi-national media companies. But considering where the concept came from, you can’t really call it a “MAGA GOP social media bill,” unless you think California passed a MAGA social media bill and Gov. Newsom signed that into law.


  15. - Norseman - Thursday, Sep 21, 23 @ 4:47 pm:

    Iliana, the MAGA GOP point goes primarily to their hypocrisy. I don’t care if they stole the bill verbatim, Newsom and California Dems are at least consistent on social media regulation.

    I also don’t care about the CA origin I don’t agree with state regulation. Remembering my time on legislative staff, we used to joke that if the idea came from CA, we didn’t want it in IL.


  16. - JS Mill - Thursday, Sep 21, 23 @ 5:23 pm:

    =SCOTUS decisions to the contrary…=

    To the contrary of history? That is odd, because it is a fact that public schools predate the revolution in New England going back to the late 17th and early 18th centuries. I don’t think the court can negate history as much as some people are trying to rewrite it at times.

    Decisions by an court that is inconsistent in following their own standards don’t really change the truth.


  17. - Chicagonk - Friday, Sep 22, 23 @ 10:10 am:

    OW - You are very wrong on what Invest in Kids does. I would suggest you do some research on the impact that the programs has had for students on the south and west sides of Chicago.


  18. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Sep 22, 23 @ 10:14 am:

    === You are very wrong on what Invest in Kids does. I would suggest you do some research on the impact that the programs has had for students on the south and west sides of Chicago.===

    Nope. I’m spot on, thanks.

    If your anecdotal is even remotely true, why o why is there a need for the tax break, who exactly is getting the monies through these kids (as vessels to funnel monies)… and the enrollment aspects and testing requirements to enter and stay entered versus open enrollment…

    I’m sorry, “it’s about the money”… the tax breaks and schools reaping a windfall.

    Prove me wrong by having all these altruistic donors merely donate without the program


  19. - Chicagonk - Friday, Sep 22, 23 @ 11:45 am:

    OW - You specifically said that Invest in Kids is about discriminating against students and using testing to decide which students get to stay.

    That is factually incorrect - Argue with facts.


  20. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Sep 22, 23 @ 11:52 am:

    === You specifically said===

    You are saying each of those schools have open enrollment for all students, and there’s no removal of students due to academics or other factors?

    Is that your “fact”


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Today's quotable: George McCaskey
* Buried nugget and magic beans
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition and some campaign stuff
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller