Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x1 *** Short-term budget gimmick creates $200 million hole next fiscal year
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 *** Short-term budget gimmick creates $200 million hole next fiscal year

Thursday, Jan 11, 2024 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Dave McKinney

Prior to the 2023 tax year, the standard [Illinois income tax] exemption increased 10 times under an automatic escalator tied to inflation put into effect in 2012 by former Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn, who served as the state’s chief executive between 2009 and 2015. The change roughly a decade ago had overwhelming bipartisan support in the legislature.

But the standard exemption will remain flat this tax-filing season at $2,425 for those who declare adjusted gross income of $250,000 or less individually or $500,000 or less for married couples.

State revenue officials say more than 11 million Illinoisans claim the standard exemption on their taxes each year. Because of the inflation-indexing mechanism, the exemption has risen from $2,000 to $2,425 since 2011.

Had lawmakers and the governor not put a pause on that inflationary adjustment, the standard exemption would have stood at $2,625 for tax year 2023. That $200 increase would have marked the largest jump in the exemption since the inflationary index was enacted. That’s because the nation’s consumer price index increased 8% in 2022 – the largest inflationary move since 1981.

By WBEZ’s calculations, the state income tax obligation for a married couple with two minor children and adjusted gross income of $150,000 would be $39 higher than it would have been this tax year had the standard exemption tracked the rate of inflation in 2023.

$39 for a household earning roughly double the median household income ain’t exactly a whole lot of money. Our standard exemption is basically a joke. It’s so small mainly because of the state constitution’s mandate that the income tax must be imposed at a “non-graduated rate.”

* But here’s the problem: The change saved the state budget $114 million this fiscal year, but as the article notes, the costs will rise next year

The current law states that the inflationary index will be reimposed for tax year 2024. But it promises to come with a significant price tag – approximately $200 million, according to an estimate by the legislature’s non-partisan budget arm, the Commission on Government Forecasting & Accountability.

$200 million is real money.

* Back to Dave’s story

Emails obtained through an open-records request to Pritzker’s budget office show that a Senate Democratic staffer appeared to initially raise freezing the standard exemption as the revenue omnibus was being negotiated last May between the offices of the governor, Senate president and House speaker.

*** UPDATE *** This change was part of SB1963, which was an omnibus tax bill. From a subscriber…

An additional observation: the CPI-adjustment was actually scheduled to sunset on 12/31/2023. PA 103-0009 extended it until 2028, at the fixed amount of $2,425 for two years and then back to inflation adjusted for 2025-2028 when it will sunset.

And if it had actually sunset in 2023 as scheduled, the exemption would revert way back to just $1,000.

Interesting.

       

7 Comments
  1. - TheInvisibleMan - Thursday, Jan 11, 24 @ 12:03 pm:

    “$200 million is real money.”

    Isn’t this just time-shifting the money though?

    If I’m reading this correctly the state ’saved’ $114M through the pause, and then 2 years later has to resume paying at an increase of $200M - that’s a net $86M expenditure over 2 years, or $43M per year.

    It’s not mentioned in the article, but I would make the safe assumption that $43M/yr is a measurement safely to-the-right-of-the-decimal-point percentage range of the total cost of the deduction off of total income taxed.


  2. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Jan 11, 24 @ 12:05 pm:

    ===Isn’t this just time-shifting the money though?===

    Not if they put that money into the spending base.


  3. - Former ILSIP - Thursday, Jan 11, 24 @ 12:09 pm:

    It’s always a mixed blessing to make the Cap Fax, eh “random Senate Democratic staffer”?


  4. - TheInvisibleMan - Thursday, Jan 11, 24 @ 12:19 pm:

    @Rich

    Then the long-term financial question becomes will the expected increase in total taxed income in this fiscal year, also from inflation, be greater than the neglected payment out from the increased deduction. Wasn’t there also a recent story about how much the average income of Illinoisans went up.

    It might be pretty close to a wash when the totality of the picture is viewed. From a quick calculation it at least seems close enough to not be a huge cause for concern - yet.

    Agree though best practice would be to not include missing money in yearly expenditures as if it was there.


  5. - Sycophantic Averse - Thursday, Jan 11, 24 @ 12:19 pm:

    I read it as the pause then created a clawback problem where the next bump takes into account the original “what would have been” plus the new bump, similar to what happened with the gas tax.


  6. - Frida's boss - Thursday, Jan 11, 24 @ 12:28 pm:

    Quinn takes some definite shots at the GA- increasing taxes on regular folks to pay for their big raises.

    Pat loves to stir the pot and call people out for sure.


  7. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Jan 11, 24 @ 12:41 pm:

    ===similar to what happened with the gas tax. ===

    That’s the *exact opposite* of what happened. The state *gave up* revenue and then got it all back in that case (minus the months of non-collection).

    In this instance, the state *took* revenue from taxpayers and now has to give it back plus lots more, after possibly putting the money it took into the base.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Feds, Illinois partner to bring DARPA quantum-testing facility to the Chicago area
* Pritzker, Durbin talk about Trump, Vance
* Napo's campaign spending questioned
* Illinois react: Trump’s VP pick J.D. Vance
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller