Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Rep. Crespo: ‘It’s an empty promise that gives people a false sense of hope’
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Rep. Crespo: ‘It’s an empty promise that gives people a false sense of hope’

Wednesday, May 15, 2024 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Isabel wrote a story for subscribers last month about Rep. Fred Crespo regularly pointing out bills that are subject to appropriations during floor debates. Rep. Crespo did it again yesterday. Capitol News Illinois

The Illinois House approved a bill Tuesday to allow student teachers to receive stipends while earning their education degree, even though the money needed to fund those stipends is unlikely to be included in next year’s budget.

House Bill 4652, by Rep. Barbara Hernandez, D-Aurora, authorizes the Illinois Board of Higher Education to disburse stipends of $10,000 per semester to student teachers working in public schools. That’s the rough equivalent of $15 an hour, based on a standard 40-hour work week. It also authorizes stipends of $2,000 per semester to the teachers who supervise them.

But the authority to disburse those funds would be subject to appropriations. And with an estimated annual cost of $68 million to fully fund the program, Hernandez conceded it is unlikely such funding will be included in the budget for the upcoming fiscal year that lawmakers are currently negotiating. […]

“Here we go again, folks. We’re passing bills that are subject to appropriations,” said Rep. Fred Crespo, D-Hoffman Estates. “I get the sense that we think it’s like Monopoly money. But you’re creating a line item and you’re putting pressure on the budget. It’s an empty promise that gives people a false sense of hope.”

Discuss.

       

13 Comments »
  1. - Two Left Feet - Wednesday, May 15, 24 @ 7:05 am:

    The next argument is that “subject to appropriations” is found X amount of times in the statutes and have never been funded.


  2. - Proud Papa Bear - Wednesday, May 15, 24 @ 8:37 am:

    He’s not completely wrong. That’s why, when we gave input, that we pushed for prioritizing those with need. That way, if the state comes nowhere near the $68 million, then whatever the state can provide will go to those who need it to get through student teaching.
    Also, people need to know when they start a program if the money will be there for them when they student teach, which can be several years down the road. Doing things on a year-to-year basis creates an unstable scenario for candidates.


  3. - JS Mill - Wednesday, May 15, 24 @ 9:28 am:

    It seems like they do this all the time in education, but it probably seems like that because that is the area that I pay closest attention to.

    In the last two years they passed two bills with an estimated funding need of $277 million. Both good bills. One to provide every student with a free lunch and the other to help fund student teachers. One would fill a genuine basic need for kids and the other would improve the teacher pipeline.

    They must not be real priorities or they would have funded them. Maybe they need some kind of therapy?


  4. - Socially DIstant watcher - Wednesday, May 15, 24 @ 9:44 am:

    All in favor of eating dessert first say aye in the opinion of the chair the ayes have it.


  5. - TJ - Wednesday, May 15, 24 @ 9:58 am:

    He’s right. It’s pretty darn easy to spend other people’s money, and that’s all that the general assembly is doing here. Oh, student teachers can be paid? Great! What’s that? Where’s the money coming from? Not our problem, school boards. Do it yourselves.


  6. - TJ - Wednesday, May 15, 24 @ 9:59 am:

    edit: and by “school boards,” I meant the state board.


  7. - levivotedforjudy - Wednesday, May 15, 24 @ 10:36 am:

    Not just education. It has happened in economic development a lot over the years.


  8. - Juvenal - Wednesday, May 15, 24 @ 11:05 am:

    I am going to be a contrarian on this point.

    “Subject to Appropriation” is language that lawmakers add because state agencies say “We love your idea, we just don’t have the money for it, so we’ll have to oppose it.”

    The truth is, they hate your idea because:

    1) it involves change, which they hate.
    2) It wasn’t their idea.
    3) They think they are the experts, and lawmakers exist to be placated.

    My advice to lawmakers is to tell the state agencies “Thanks but no thanks.” Do not make the change subject to appropriation, and instead ask them where they would like you to make cuts elsewhere.

    If the agencies can come up with $800M in cuts for the governor, they can come up with $800M in cuts for the General Assembly.

    And tell them if they cant find the cuts themselves, you will eliminate management positions.

    Leader Crespo, call me anytime.


  9. - Norseman - Wednesday, May 15, 24 @ 11:15 am:

    Being an early adopter of the “subject to appropriations” contingency phrase for non-objectionable new programs that wasn’t in the spending priorities of the agency, I found most legislators never followed through with the money.

    Frustratingly, the auditors would ding us for not implementing these programs despite the protestations that it wasn’t an obligation without an appropriation.


  10. - Dirty Red - Wednesday, May 15, 24 @ 12:11 pm:

    Fred Crespo has taken a lot of heat from his own members for raising these issues even though he has been around long enough to know they create very, VERY real problems that can have an overly harmful affect on the very constituents these budget lines are meant to protect. Take it from a RINO who appreciated working with Rep. Crespo - the long-time chair of the House Committee on Appropriations (General Services) and Legislative Audit Commission - during the impasse and the state’s fiscal catastrophe leading up to it:

    Listen to him.


  11. - Commonsense in Illinois - Wednesday, May 15, 24 @ 12:41 pm:

    Fred Crespo is spot on. For years in my career, I regularly criticized the practice of legislators and their staffs inserting the “subject to appropriation” language in bills. Adding that makes the bill meaningless, which in turn makes the statute toothless.

    The practice needs to be done away with, and any law with that provision needs to be amended and the provision removed.


  12. - Demoralized - Wednesday, May 15, 24 @ 1:05 pm:

    @Juvenal

    You couldn’t be more wrong. And it’s clear you don’t understand how the appropriation process works. Without an appropriation agencies couldn’t do this stuff even if they wanted to. And I’m assuming this appropriation would come from the General Revenue Fund which is an entirely different issue.


  13. - Norseman - Wednesday, May 15, 24 @ 3:08 pm:

    === The truth is … ===

    The truth is that it’s not the truth, but an observation that may or may not be applicable to a particular situation. It certainly doesn’t describe the legislation I dealt with.

    Agencies are inadequately funded as it is, so adding another program - adjudged good or bad - is a strain on resources. Obviously, these new initiatives are not a priority or else they’d already be a part of agency programming. As far as expertise, for the most part agencies do possess more than the average solon. However, I know several long-term members who were quite expert in their legislative areas of interest.


TrackBack URI

Uncivil comments, profanity of any kind, rumors and anonymous commenters will not be tolerated and will likely result in banishment.



* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Uber Partners With Cities To Expand Urban Transportation
* Yes on operations and capital spending, No on revenues to pay for it
* Giannoulias on House floor while bill goes down
* Some budget react
* Governor rebuffs Rep. Crespo’s worries of future fiscal cliff
* Coverage roundup: House sends $53.1 billion FY25 budget to the governor
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Welch: 'No one's ever said the House is boring'
* House passes budget 65-45 - BIMP passes 62-46 - Grocery tax elimination sails 86-20 - Revenue omnibus put on postponed consideration - Motion to reconsider passes - But big problem and Dems will have to suspend the rules - Concurrence motion finally passes as GOP gives up
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller