Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Commercial property taxes dropped by $122 million in the south and southwest suburbs, while residential taxes jumped 20 percent
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Commercial property taxes dropped by $122 million in the south and southwest suburbs, while residential taxes jumped 20 percent

Thursday, Jun 27, 2024 - Posted by Rich Miller

* The full study is here. Cook County Treasurer press release with emphasis added by me

Homeowners in many south and southwest suburbs will have to pay a lot more in property taxes as the median tax bill jumped a record 19.9% in the region, according to an analysis released today by Cook County Treasurer Maria Pappas.

The biggest increases in homeowners’ tax bills occurred in 15 south suburbs where taxes soared 30% or more. Of those 15 suburbs, 13 have mostly Black populations. In two towns, Dixmoor and Phoenix, the median tax bill more than doubled.

“Many homeowners are going to be shocked and angry when they get their bills,” Pappas said. “South suburban homeowners already pay some of the highest property taxes in the county, and these increases will make paying those bills even more difficult.”

A research team created by Pappas released its Tax Year 2023 Bill Analysis, a detailed examination of nearly 1.8 million bills to be mailed to property owners July 2 and due a month later on Aug. 1.

This year’s Second Installment bills include a new feature, “Where Your Money Goes,” that breaks down the amounts of money billed by each taxing district and shows whether taxes went up or down.

Among key findings of the analysis:

    • Across Cook County, property taxes rose about $706 million, climbing from $17.6 billion to $18.3 billion. Homeowners are shouldering an extra $611 million, or nearly 86% of this year’s increase, while commercial properties owe an extra $102.9 million and taxes on vacant land dropped by $7.8 million.
    • In the south and southwest suburbs, where all properties were reassessed, taxes rose a total of $265.4 million. The median south suburban residential tax bill increased by 19.9%, the largest percentage increase in at least 29 years, according to Treasurer’s data. Homeowners bore the brunt of the increase as their taxes rose $396.8 million while taxes on commercial properties dropped by $121.6 million.
    • In the north and northwest suburbs, taxes rose $213.7 million from $4.06 billion to $4.27 billion. Residential taxes increased $109.8 million while taxes on commercial properties increased $103.1 million.
    • In Chicago, taxes increased by a modest 2.6%, largely because of an increase in the Chicago Public Schools tax levy and bill increases in many tax increment finance districts. In the north and northwest suburbs, overall taxes rose by 4%, with slightly bigger percentage increases for businesses than homeowners.

Homeowners in the south and southwest suburbs are being hit hard because new assessment shifted 4% of the overall tax burden from businesses onto them. The financial shift was caused by elimination of the 10% COVID-19 assessment reduction enacted in 2020, higher home selling prices and the success businesses had appealing their assessments at the Board of Review, which handles appeals of valuations made by the Assessor’s Office.

Particularly hard hit were homeowners in Park Forest, where the median residential bill rose by 56% to $7,152. In Dixmoor, the median bill increased by 122%, to $1,950. And in Phoenix, where nearly all of the village is in a tax increment finance district, the median bill shot up by 107% to $1,744.

Nearly 4,200 south and southwest suburban homeowners who paid no taxes last year will get bills this year. That’s because the value of their exemptions no longer exceeds the higher assessed values of their homes. The median for those bills was $1,115.

Across the county, more than 1.3 million homeowners must pay more in property taxes, while about 251,600 were billed less. Taxes for more than 88,000 commercial properties increased, while nearly 28,000 went down.

State law allows school districts to hike taxes by the prior year’s increase in the Consumer Price Index, or 5%, whichever is less. Because the CPI increased by 6.5% in 2022, school districts were allowed a 5% increase. But the overall percentage increase was higher, partly due to a provision called recapture.

Recapture is a 2021 provision in the Illinois tax code that allows school districts and many local governments to recover money refunded to property owners who successfully appealed their taxes the previous year. Recapture led to an additional $136.3 million being tacked onto bills this year. That’s $51.9 million less than was added to property owners’ bills last year.

Significant increases in the amount of money the city of Chicago and Chicago Public Schools said they needed to operate, coupled with recapture and higher tax increment financing district bills, boosted the overall property tax burden in Chicago by $221.8 million. That broke down as a $116.6 million increase on commercial properties and a $103.9 million increase on residential properties.

* Sun-Times

“But because of the shift of assessed value from commercial to residential in the south and southwest suburbs, less than a third of businesses in that region received higher bills for tax year 2023,” treasurer’s officials concluded. “Even though tax rates in the south suburbs declined, in some cases significantly, the 19 highest tax rates in Cook County are still in Chicago’s south suburbs, where the population is primarily lower-income Black residents — demonstrating once again the stark inequities in the Illinois property tax system.”

* Tribune

In Park Forest, where the median bill is up by $2,567 to $7,152, Mayor Joseph Woods called the increases a “catastrophe” for homeowners and said the village is working to influence policy changes at the county and state levels while seeking out grant funding to avoid having to levy more taxes at the village level.

“We know that there seems to be an unfairness or inequity in regards to the way, you know, properties are assessed,” Woods said in an interview Wednesday. “So we’re looking at every option and trying to lobby everyone.”

The village is split between Cook County and Will County. Woods said the difference in taxes is stark depending on which side of the border people live.

* Daily Herald

Pappas urged state lawmakers to take action.

“This is the 30th year in a row everything’s increased,” she said. “You can’t keep studying the property tax system and keep saying it doesn’t work then do nothing about it. It’s time for Springfield to make changes.”

       

47 Comments
  1. - LVT Enjoyer - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 11:13 am:

    Chicagoland needs the land value tax system which does not penalize property improvements in the way that the property tax system does.


  2. - Downstate - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 11:14 am:

    Park Forest - Average bill is $7,152.

    Via Redfin, the average home price was $150k in Park Forest. So, they are paying 4.7% of their home’s value in property taxes.

    By comparison, in my rural community, I’m paying about 2%


  3. - H-W - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 11:32 am:

    Whatever the institutional means used, the institutional means used seems to have targeted black citizens, if 13 of the 15 suburbs that saw +30% increases are majority black.

    This is how institutional discrimination works. It does not have to be intentional. It is the outcome that demonstrates disparate effects along ethnic lines.

    If for example, unequal earnings and segregation leads minority citizens to buy homes in lower priced neighborhoods, and then those neighborhoods are shown to have been reassessed at higher rates of increase relative to other neighborhoods, then the effect impacts minority citizens more, through no fault of their own. Institutional discrimination becomes institutional racism.

    The policy needs to be reviewed.


  4. - Sox Fan - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 11:32 am:

    ===Park Forest - Average bill is $7,152.

    Via Redfin, the average home price was $150k in Park Forest. So, they are paying 4.7% of their home’s value in property taxes.

    By comparison, in my rural community, I’m paying about 2%===

    In comparison, a commercial property valued at $150k in Park Forest will see a tax bill of approximately 17,880. The Assessor’s desire to shift an even higher burden onto the commercial tax base is criminal.


  5. - ZC - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 11:33 am:

    >> “This is the 30th year in a row everything’s increased,” she said. “You can’t keep studying the property tax system and keep saying it doesn’t work then do nothing about it. It’s time for Springfield to make changes.”

    They did. Then the Illinois electorate said No.


  6. - Anyone Remember - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 11:41 am:

    Does anyone report, by taxing authority, how much property tax revenue is “foregone” for senior citizens, disable veterans, whatever else?


  7. - Rahm's Parking Meter - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 11:43 am:

    At some point, we have to address that Fritz Kaegi and his staff overassess a lot of property.


  8. - Donnie Elgin - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 11:48 am:

    Tell lawmakers not to file Senoir freeze legislation like SB2030 - which would have increased the income eligibility to 75K versus the current 65K- the senior freeze while a well-meaning feel-good program creates a huge tax burden shift to other resident taxpayers.


  9. - TheInvisibleMan - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 11:49 am:

    “where nearly all of the village is in a tax increment finance district”

    This is an expected feature of what happens when places turn their town into a TIF, not a bug.

    For reference, my approx prop tax rate is 1.4%, based on an appraisal that was coincidentally done last week, and current year taxes paid.


  10. - Bohemian Rap City - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 11:50 am:

    Its a strange world when Maria Pappas can be right on policy issues. Maybe hiring all those former Tribune reporters worked.


  11. - Downstate - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 11:52 am:

    “In comparison, a commercial property valued at $150k in Park Forest will see a tax bill of approximately 17,880.”

    Yikes. Buying property in an area like that can be “catching a fall knife”. Someone that’s willing to pay $7k/year in property taxes, typically doesn’t want to live in a $150k house.

    If prices don’t increase, but local spending does, then even higher taxes will be needed.

    Interesting to note on Realtor.com the number of homes for sale at less than $200k. One house, at $200k with 6 bedrooms has an annual tax bill of $12k. That’s 6% of it’s offer price.


  12. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 11:52 am:

    ===we have to address that Fritz Kaegi and his staff overassess a lot of property===

    Or that the Board of Review reverses too many commercial tax increases.


  13. - Google Is Your Friend - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:01 pm:

    - Sox Fan - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 11:32 am:

    You’re reading level is about as good as the Sox winning percentage. Try again, this time for comprehension:

    == In the south and southwest suburbs, where all properties were reassessed, taxes rose a total of $265.4 million. The median south suburban residential tax bill increased by 19.9%, the largest percentage increase in at least 29 years, according to Treasurer’s data. Homeowners bore the brunt of the increase as their taxes rose $396.8 million while taxes on commercial properties dropped by $121.6 million.==

    Heck, Rich even bolded the last sentence!


  14. - Sox Fan - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:01 pm:

    ===Or that the Board of Review reverses too many commercial tax increases.===

    Per your reporting, the recapture provision tacked on an additional 136M to the property tax levy. If the BOR sustains all of the CCAO’s commercial values and property owners seek relief at PTAB, we likely end up in the same place (or worse when factoring in the interest on those elevated refunds).


  15. - City Zen - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:02 pm:

    Any comment from the Property Tax Relief Task Force?


  16. - TheInvisibleMan - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:07 pm:

    “Does anyone report, by taxing authority[…]”

    GPT can probably do it for you.

    Identify the source of the info, likely at the township level. Also potentially can be gained through a county GIS system portal, but will take a little more complex of a prompt. Then feed that into GPT as the source. You can probably even use the url directly in the prompt instead of setting it up as an external datasource.

    I haven’t done this myself, but you’ve sparked my interest enough to light a fire of motivation that I will be doing it with my local GIS this weekend.


  17. - thisjustinagain - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:10 pm:

    I live the Village of Riverdale (not the Chicago neighborhood by the same name). Assessor raised my value from 45K to 95k in ONE year. On appeal they “lowered” it to 81K. Board of Review went to 71K. I’m now before the PTAB asking for a value of 55K, because that was the only offer I got on my house in 2022. But hey, commercial properties didn’t go up in value like my house did in a year?? It’s farcical.


  18. - Sox Fan - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:12 pm:

    -Google is your friend

    I’m not sure what I said that you’re taking issue with. The facts are that commercial property is assessed at 25% of its market value and residential at 10%. So a commercial property assessed at the same market value will pay a tax bill 2.5X higher than a residential property with the same market value. If you don’t believe me, Google it.


  19. - TheInvisibleMan - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:19 pm:

    This is dealing with the extremes, but this same thing happens in every town. Granted to a much less severe degree. How many people look at the local tax rolls to see this though? I’m sure I can count the number on one hand.

    While your residential assessment will change every single year, commercial properties will stay locked at the same assessment for years. Even without being in a TIF.

    I have a GIS tab already open, and looking at a specific nearby to me example, the local Steak and Shake has a property assessment this current year of 2024 set to 464k, with 35k of property taxes due. In 2019, their assessment was… 464k. With 35k of property taxes due. Yes, they are paying less property taxes in 2024 than they paid in 2019, even with the exact same assessment in both years.

    Like I said, the cases presented here are the extremes, but that same framework exists everywhere. Personally, I think everyone should know how this works, but in all honesty nothing is stopping anyone from seeing this themselves. The data is all public and extremely easy to get to.


  20. - Joe Bloe - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:23 pm:

    For a breakdown of tax bills by taxing district, go to Cook County Property Tax Portal (website from Pappas’ office) and type in the property PIN and you can get all taxing districts, their rates and their percentage increases.


  21. - Boone's is Back - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:25 pm:

    The Assessor issues assessments, not the Board of Review. It wasn’t uncommon for residential increases by his office to be upwards of 100% for south and western suburban homeowners during the reassessment last year. How does a family budget for that?


  22. - Aaron B - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:26 pm:

    Thanks Rich for the additional coverage on this since I commented about this part on the morning briefing earlier.

    I don’t know how prevalent these issues but it definitely isn’t only a Cook County issue. (Reposting part of my earlier comment) “I’m in the city of Kankakee and our 2023 residential assessments rose by 14% while industrial/commercial value was flat. The city requested a 3% increase in the tax levy but that resulted in a 9% increase in the city portion of the taxes for residential owners while commercial/industrial are getting a reduction.” When I bought my house 2 years ago, my first property tax bill was about 3.5% of my purchase price. Now my second property tax bill (correcting for the 14.25% increase in assessments) is now about 3.8% of my assessed FMV.

    A big part of my issue with the property tax system in my county (and Illinois) is how opaque the process is and the lack of any easy way to find properties to use in an assessment appeal. Sure I can try to look at Zillow and Redfin to see square footage and beds/baths but that won’t do any good for the large number of homes that haven’t sold on 20+ years. The tax bills are online but they don’t contain any info about the actual house that is useful for filing an appeal. If I compare recent sale prices to the assessed value then a large majority of houses are assessed at lower (or much lower) than the 1/3rd of the value of the house. Meanwhile my house is assessed at 1/3rd of what I paid for it so I’m paying higher taxes than houses that are worth quite a bit more than my house.

    I need to try talking to my assessor again about this but last time I talked to him he acted like he was doing me a favor by bringing my assessment down to exactly 1/3rd of what I bought the house for. I don’t want to try to get out of paying taxes that I owe, I just don’t want to be paying comparitively more in taxes than almost everyone else in my neighborhood.


  23. - Hannibal Lecter - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:28 pm:

    === How does a family budget for that? ===

    They can’t. He is literally screwing over families.


  24. - Two Left Feet - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:33 pm:

    From the study: “The biggest TIF tax decline in the south and southwest suburbs was in the Interstate Crossings TIF district, home to an Amazon distribution facility in Markham, which is billing $5 million less than last year, for a total of $15 million.”

    So property was put into a TIF because it was blighted, tax money from the property in the TIF was targeted to support the development of an Amazon distribution facility and the tax bill for the TIF went from $20m to $15m “because the assessed value of the properties in those districts dropped below where they stood when they originally were formed.” Imagine the drop in the assessed value without the Amazon distribution facility.


  25. - Timzilla - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:37 pm:

    —The Assessor issues assessments, not the Board of Review. It wasn’t uncommon for residential increases by his office to be upwards of 100% for south and western suburban homeowners during the reassessment last year. How does a family budget for that? —-

    This right here. Kaegi will point his fingers at everyone else (Board of Review, PTAB, tax rates, Berrios, etc…) but the reality is he has no idea what he is doing. His office is very good at PR but terrible at assessing.

    The Trib story has houses in Phoenix Illinois (not Arizona) seeing assessment increases of 170%. You can talk about commercial properties and tax rates all you want, but in what world can you justify a 170% assessment increases in Phoenix Illinois?


  26. - Ugh - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:37 pm:

    People really need to stop misusing the word “literally.”


  27. - Garfield Ridge Guy - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:49 pm:

    ==They did. Then the Illinois electorate said No.==

    There is no plausible reason to believe that property taxes would have decreased, or not increased, at any point over the past four years had the Fair Tax passed.


  28. - Google Is Your Friend - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:52 pm:

    ==- Sox Fan - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:12 pm:==

    Fact: “taxes on commercial properties dropped by $121.6 million.”


  29. - TheInvisibleMan - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 12:58 pm:

    “They can’t. He is literally screwing over families.”

    Absurd.

    I budgeted for my property taxes to be 100% higher by the time the house would be paid off, when I first bought my house.

    Even with regular inflation you should expect a doubling of prices, including property taxes, every 23 years or so. That’s a shorter amount of time than most mortgages. Why would people not budget for that? Sure, the 100% came sooner than expected but that’s why its budgeted in the first place, to give you time to find another place to live when that limit is hit.

    Not every personal problem is the governments fault.


  30. - Back to the Future - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 1:04 pm:

    Hat tip to Treasurer Pappas on her work in this area.
    These property tax increases are really unfortunate.


  31. - Huh? - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 1:33 pm:

    With Madigan and Burke out of the picture, who has the legal services property tax concession? Whoever they are, they must be making a killing in legal fees.


  32. - Rahm's Parking Meter - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 1:36 pm:

    Rich, just saw your comment, also fair.


  33. - Downstate - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 1:43 pm:

    “I budgeted for my property taxes to be 100% higher by the time the house would be paid off, when I first bought my house.”

    Do you have any other budget items that increased by 56% from one year to the next? That’s what Park Forest homeowners are facing. There’s no reasonable forecasting that would ever account for that.


  34. - City Zen - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 1:50 pm:

    ==There is no plausible reason to believe that property taxes would have decreased, or not increased, at any point over the past four years had the Fair Tax passed.==

    Yep. Case in point: California. Despite having the most progressive state income tax in the country, highest tax bracket in the country, and repeatedly increasing their highest tax brackets over the years, unions keep trying to repeal Prop 13. And it’s not like CA has the lowest property taxes to begin with.


  35. - TheInvisibleMan - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 1:54 pm:

    “There’s no reasonable forecasting”

    Yes there is, if you are budgeting properly. With a 56% increase in one year, while certainly a large hit, you should still have a 44% cushion in your property tax budget.

    The only accelerating variable in this situation is the timeframe, not the amount.


  36. - Nothing - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 1:59 pm:

    Totally unsustainable state wide and it will lead to many city bankruptcies state wide (no choice) during the next major downturn, which will be here soon due to inflation. Enjoy the pension cuts.


  37. - Hannibal Lecter - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 2:11 pm:

    === Not every personal problem is the governments fault. ===

    I have been in my home for less than 5 years, or less than 2 full assessment cycles.


  38. - Huh? - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 2:13 pm:

    “Enjoy the pension cuts”

    Nope. Constitutional protected. This has been argued on this blog ad nauseam.


  39. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 2:15 pm:

    ===many city bankruptcies===

    They have to approved by the state.


  40. - Old IL Dude - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 2:17 pm:

    Aren’t we kinda taxed to death in this region?


  41. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 2:21 pm:

    Nothing, in September of 2015 - almost 9 years ago - you wrote “I am so lucky to be leaving this state. Any of you morons that stick around will surely wish you hadn’t soon enough.”

    And yet, here you are 9 years later with the same IP address.

    Moron.


  42. - BigLou - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 2:26 pm:

    Even if assessment’s went down or stayed level wouldn’t real estate taxes still go up because the various taxing agencies are the ones asking for the money, not the assessor. In essence assessment gets lowered the taxes increase because pension, schools, forest preserve, etc. needs?
    I don’t agree with my assessment but we also have to look at what the money is actually going to.


  43. - Aaron B - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 2:43 pm:

    ==Even if assessment’s went down or stayed level wouldn’t real estate taxes still go up because the various taxing agencies are the ones asking for the money, not the assessor. ==

    Yes, taxes will still go up since the various agencies are usually requesting increases. At least some of the difference is that some areas are increasing the tax burden disproportionately on to home owners while lessening the burden on commercial property. In the City of Kankakee, the city requested a reasonable 3% increase in their levy. That 3% increase resulted in me paying 9% more to the city because residential assessments increased 14.25% last year and the commercial/industrial assessments were flat.


  44. - Anthony - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 2:55 pm:

    Infuriating


  45. - Anyone Remember - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 3:21 pm:

    … unions keep trying to repeal Prop 13. And it’s not like CA has the lowest property taxes to begin with.”

    Not exactly.

    Lloyd Bridges’ children “own” their father’s house. Because of Prop. 13, in 2018 they paid $5,700 property taxes on a $6,800,000 residence. If sold in 2018 (resetting Prop. 13’s calculator), new owners would pay over $76,000. (Google Search on “jeff and beau bridges property taxes” – 2018 LA Times story should appear first).

    As advisor to Arnold Schwarzenegger, in 2003 Warren Buffett pointed out property taxes on his $500,000 home in Omaha were $14,401, but on his $4,000,000 home in Laguna Beach were $2,264. (Berkshire Hathaway link below.) Simply for raising the issue, Buffet was run out of CA (although Arnold’s media people said he was fired). CA’s property tax rates are “hit or miss” … .

    https://www.berkshirehathaway.com/wsjstory.pdf


  46. - Lagartha's Shield - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 4:02 pm:

    I love it when Rich throws down the receipts.


  47. - JRM - Thursday, Jun 27, 24 @ 5:54 pm:

    Tax rates are a big factor in the south suburbs where they are 3 to 4 times higher (21-25%) than in Chicago (7%).

    Part of the difference is the relative scarcity of high value properties compared to the City.

    Another part is that all these south suburbs have their own police departments, fire departments, and public schools. Combining some of these districts into larger area-wide districts would reduce tax rates. But that would also reduce the number of jobs that local elected officials want to control through their ability to appoint grateful supportive patrons.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Uber’s Local Partnership = Stress-Free Travel For Paratransit Riders
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Showcasing The Retailers Who Make Illinois Work
* Some election news (Updated)
* Meanwhile… In Opposite Land
* Roundup: Former ComEd board appointee testifies about Madigan’s role in securing his seat
* This judge needs to be pulled off of domestic violence cases (Updated x2)
* Caption contest!
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller