Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Trial gives glimpse into how Madigan managed his members
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Trial gives glimpse into how Madigan managed his members

Thursday, Nov 14, 2024 - Posted by Rich Miller

* It was well-known that Speaker Madigan ran the House the way he ran the 13th Ward operation. He tended to treat his Democratic legislators as constituents (which they are in a way because they vote every two years on leadership). And it wasn’t just about their bills or projects in their districts. A nephew has legal trouble? Go to Madigan and he’ll help find you a good lawyer. Want to impress the in-laws with good Cubs tickets? Madigan has those. Need a job for somebody close to you? Ask Madigan

* From the mentioned Tribune article

Later, Andrade “reached out to thank McClain for landing his wife a job at the secretary of state’s office,” prosecutors wrote in the filing, arguing the episode provides “another example of Madigan and McClain rewarding Madigan’s political allies with benefits, which is alleged as one of the purposes of the criminal enterprise.”

In his comments to the Tribune on Monday, Andrade said he didn’t know if Madigan had anything to do with his wife’s hiring. And while Andrade remembers talking to McClain, he’s not sure why he would have thanked him specifically.

He said a bout with COVID has caused lapses in his memory. But Andrade said he did remember that, during the call, McClain misidentified the division of White’s office where his wife worked.

It wasn’t all shady. For instance, when Rep. Esther Golar left the hospital to vote to override a Bruce Rauner veto, the hospital refused to readmit her. Madigan helped get her back in. More here.

       

11 Comments »
  1. - Barrister's Lectern - Thursday, Nov 14, 24 @ 12:37 pm:

    === Later, Andrade “reached out to thank McClain for landing his wife a job at the secretary of state’s office,” prosecutors wrote in the filing, arguing the episode provides “another example of Madigan and McClain rewarding Madigan’s political allies with benefits, which is alleged as one of the purposes of the criminal enterprise.”

    So Madigan recommending someone for a job at the Secretary of State’s Office is now criminal activity? I thought elected officials had a first amendment right to make job recommendations?


  2. - Excitable Boy - Thursday, Nov 14, 24 @ 12:43 pm:

    - So Madigan recommending someone for a job at the Secretary of State’s Office is now criminal activity? -

    Who said that? Have you never followed a trial before?


  3. - Barrister's Lectern - Thursday, Nov 14, 24 @ 12:54 pm:

    Excitable Boy, the excerpt cited above literally used the job recommendation to the SOS as “another example of Madigan and McClain rewarding Madigan’s political allies with benefits, which is alleged as one of the purposes of the criminal enterprise.”


  4. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Nov 14, 24 @ 1:20 pm:

    ===which is alleged as one of the purposes of the criminal enterprise===

    It’s an illustration of how the alleged criminal stuff was also handled.

    A pal of mine calls this the “Seinfeld Finale Trial,” and my pal is not far off.


  5. - Beep booop - Thursday, Nov 14, 24 @ 1:37 pm:

    Interesting strategy, I’d be a bit concerned (if I was prosecution) that jurors hear stuff like this and simply think “Sounds like they were just good at their jobs and good at taking care of their people.”

    I know it’s just one data point , but still. The lawyers know more than I do, just speculating


  6. - James - Thursday, Nov 14, 24 @ 1:48 pm:

    The Feds continue to paint a weak picture to me. There is smoke here, but it seems like just smoke from incense and not from a fire. This all just seems like typical political horse trading and member management.


  7. - hystorically - Thursday, Nov 14, 24 @ 1:55 pm:

    ==Interesting strategy, I’d be a bit concerned (if I was prosecution) that jurors hear stuff like this and simply think “Sounds like they were just good at their jobs and good at taking care of their people.” ==

    Most people don’t have “a guy” they can call up to help a spouse or a nephew get a job. When they hear these things they likely don’t think they’re good at their job, but rather why the heck is a politician helping this guy when no one is helping me. They jump to the conclusion it must be nefarious. The government is using wholly legal conduct to make the point that legal conduct was used for criminal purposes.


  8. - Pundent - Thursday, Nov 14, 24 @ 2:11 pm:

    =I’d be a bit concerned (if I was prosecution) that jurors hear stuff like this and simply think “Sounds like they were just good at their jobs and good at taking care of their people.”=

    Having participated in quite a few trials I suspect that the jurors are growing tired. Jurors expect to see some sort of a smoking gun. It’s part of our human nature and what we’re accustomed to from TV and movies. When their is no smoking gun jurors either invent one in their minds, or take out their frustrations on the attorneys often by focusing on minutiae or personal characteristics (how the attorneys talk, what they wear, personal habits, tics, etc.). A long trial, based on lots of inferences, runs the risk of this being more about the courtroom characters than the evidence. Politicians are generally disliked which doesn’t bode well for Madigan, but the prosecution’s case does not seem exceptionally strong. Trying a case over multiple months unless you’re going through lots of specific criminal acts. This case seems like it’s being built largely on inferences and perceptions.


  9. - A Long Time Coming - Thursday, Nov 14, 24 @ 3:24 pm:

    = The government is using wholly legal conduct to make the point that legal conduct was used for criminal purposes.=

    To Barrister’s point, what was the criminal purpose here?


  10. - Beep booop - Thursday, Nov 14, 24 @ 4:48 pm:

    == Most people don’t have “a guy” they can call up to help a spouse or a nephew get a job.==

    Fair, I grew up very poor and basically the only way to break into jobs though were knowing someone or just applying at a retail or restaurant job and getting lucky.

    Not saying it’s right, but I do think the concept of a “guy” is somewhat widespread. Granted not every guy (any guy?) is as powerful as MJM, so that’s a clear difference. But the concept of a friend hooking it up for a friend is about as American as apple pie in my experience. Transcending race or class.


  11. - Excitable Boy - Thursday, Nov 14, 24 @ 4:57 pm:

    - To Barrister’s point, what was the criminal purpose here? -

    I’m not an attorney, but it seems to me they’re establishing a pattern of behavior that shows McClain did act at the direction of Madigan on things such as job placements.


TrackBack URI

Uncivil comments, profanity of any kind, rumors and anonymous commenters will not be tolerated and will likely result in banishment.



* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* The Waukegan City Clerk was railroaded
* Whatever happened, the city has a $40 million budget hole it didn't disclose until now
* Manar gives state agencies budget guidance: Cut, cut, cut
* Roundup: Ex-Chicago Ald. Danny Solis testifies in Madigan corruption trial
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller