Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Roundup: Madigan corruption trial
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Roundup: Madigan corruption trial

Tuesday, Nov 19, 2024 - Posted by Isabel Miller

* Center Square

Prosecutors on Monday took the jury in the corruption trial of former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan through nearly a decade of payments to subcontractors who they allege did little or no work for the state’s largest utility despite getting paid.

Jurors watched as Madigan associate Jay Doherty’s lobbying contract with Illinois electric utility Commonwealth Edison grew from $200,000 a year to more than $400,000 a year as he added subcontractors – without explanation – to his longstanding lobbying contract with ComEd.

Prosecutors allege that Madigan ordered ComEd to hire his political operatives for no-show jobs in exchange for passing legislation in Springfield that was favorable to the utility.

With Doherty’s longtime administrative assistant Janet Gallegos on the witness stand, prosecutors detailed month by month invoices that Doherty sent to ComEd, lobbying registration for the subcontractors and other details.

* Capitol News Illinois

The arrangement began with former Chicago Ald. Frank Olivo in 2011 and grew to include top precinct captains Raymond Nice and Ed Moody from Madigan’s 13th Ward power base on Chicago’s Southwest Side. Later, former state Rep. Eddie Acevedo and former Chicago Ald. Michael Zalewski would also get in on the deal.

ComEd indirectly paid out more than $1.3 million to the men over the eight years, payments that prosecutors allege were meant to bribe Madigan in exchange for favorable legislation in Springfield. The names on McClain’s yellow legal pad list indicate it was written soon after his retirement in December 2016 before Acevedo was added to the mix. […]

The jury last week and Monday heard from FBI agents who searched Doherty’s downtown Chicago office and his home in a swanky condo in the affluent Streeterville neighborhood. Neither search turned up any evidence of work product put together by the subcontractors for ComEd, and Doherty’s former administrative assistant Janet Gallegos testified Monday that she was unaware of any work the subcontractors did for her boss.

But the agents did recover documents that indicated just how little the subcontractors spoke to the man whose name was on their checks. Olivo, the former alderman who’d been put under Doherty’s contract shortly after his retirement from city council in 2011, would usually write a little note to Gallegos on a fax cover sheet when he sent his $4,000 invoice each month. In two of the notes from 2013 and 2015, Olivo wrote “say hello to Jay.”

* ABC Chicago

“What did you talk about with Mr. Olivo?” Assistant U.S Attorney Sarah Streicker asked, in reference to subcontractor and former 13th Ward Alderman Olivo.

“We talked about invoices being received, payments and also family,” Gallegos said.

“Did you ever talk to him about any work he was doing?” Streicker asked.

Gallegos said, “no.”

* Sun-Times

On Monday, prosecutors called several FBI agents to the stand. Among them was Edward McNamara, who told jurors about a May 2019 search of McClain’s home in Quincy.

The panel got a glimpse of McClain’s basement office, including the exposed insulation in the walls and a row of at least 10 filing cabinets. That’s where agents recovered printed-off copies of McClain’s emails seeking internships and jobs for people allegedly tied to Madigan.

In two tote bags found in McClain’s Toyota Avalon, McNamara said agents found a handwritten note that included the words “Speaker” and “Available 24/7.”

Agents also found McClain’s well-known list of Madigan allies, written on stationary from the Talbott Hotel.

Also figuring in McClain’s earlier trial, it’s known as his ‘magic list.’

* Tribune

Among the five pages was a printed email from McClain, one of Madigan’s closest confidants, describing the pages as a “Magic Lobbyist List” and using his favorite euphemism of “Friend” to refer to the speaker. The recipients of the email had been blind-copied, hiding their names.

“So since I don’t roam the halls like I use to do I do not have the same ‘on site’ engagement that I use to have,” read the email, which was shown to jurors Monday in the corruption trial of Madigan and McClain. “A Friend of ours and myself have gone through the ‘magic list’ and frankly culled quite a few names …There are now a little less than two dozen on the list.”

McClain went on to ask the recipient of the email for help fishing for potential clients.

“If you have a potential client come up to you and seek you as a lobbyist but you cannot for whatever reason please engage him/her and try to get him or her to consider a recommendation from you,” McClain wrote. “Please call me then and I will have a conversation with someone and get back to you asap.”

       

13 Comments »
  1. - ElTacoBandito - Tuesday, Nov 19, 24 @ 10:31 am:

    Madigan defenders like to pick apart some of the prosecutions evidence as just normal politics in Illinois, and I think they’ve been right some of the time. But I don’t know how you defend the no-show payments for his 13th ward boys.


  2. - Rabid - Tuesday, Nov 19, 24 @ 10:32 am:

    Did the Madigan employment agency get a kickback or percentage


  3. - Donnie Elgin - Tuesday, Nov 19, 24 @ 10:52 am:

    The administrative assistant’s testimony is very damning - she is likely to be clear of any corruption charges and did not make any deals in exchange for her testimony- this will hurt MJM/Mclain

    “We talked about invoices being received, payments and also family,” Gallegos said. “Did you ever talk to him about any work he was doing?” Streicker asked. Gallegos said, “no.”


  4. - Barrister's Lectern - Tuesday, Nov 19, 24 @ 10:54 am:

    === But I don’t know how you defend the no-show payments for his 13th ward boys. ===

    Why didn’t ComEd/Fidel Marquez just assign them work? I mean there has been no evidence that shows when the ask was made that they asked for jobs that require little to no work. Are job recommenders now responsible for the work performance of those they recommend?


  5. - low level - Tuesday, Nov 19, 24 @ 11:12 am:

    Fair to say it was not a good day for the defense.


  6. - Larry Bowa Jr. - Tuesday, Nov 19, 24 @ 11:17 am:

    BL, do you spend a lot of time going around trying to get people out into jobs they aren’t qualified to do?
    I’d imagine from Com Ed’s perspective it’s just a compounding loss to give these idiots actual work to do. You’re already spending a certain amount of time and money rewarding the politician with the jobs, now you’re going to waste additional time trying to train all the connected layabouts to do actual work they have zero interest in?


  7. - Ryder - Tuesday, Nov 19, 24 @ 11:19 am:

    I think Madigan’s downfall will be the no show jobs. The Jury is going to remember that. What strikes me is the sure greed of all four of the sub contractor recipients….all four were getting 100k plus pensions. Amazing and pathetic that Madigan was ok with that. That’s his Legacy.


  8. - Barrister's Lectern - Tuesday, Nov 19, 24 @ 11:52 am:

    === BL, do you spend a lot of time going around trying to get people out into jobs they aren’t qualified to do? ===

    I can’t speak to their qualifications, but the onus is on the company to determine whether these people can perform the work they are hired to perform. And last I checked, elected officials have a First Amendment right to recommend people for jobs. The onus is on the recipient of the recommendation to figure out whether they want to hire them or not.

    Also, once again, there is no evidence that Madigan requested these people to be hired for little to no work.


  9. - New Day - Tuesday, Nov 19, 24 @ 12:57 pm:

    “Also, once again, there is no evidence that Madigan requested these people to be hired for little to no work.”

    You’re working very hard to defend the Speaker which is your right to do. But cmon, you don’t really believe this was all just innocent recommendations with no expectations. Unlike the jurors who probably didn’t watch or listen to the tapes in the ComEd 4 case. We did and what you assert doesn’t even pass the laugh test let alone the evidence in that case.


  10. - Barrister's Lectern - Tuesday, Nov 19, 24 @ 1:04 pm:

    === We did and what you assert doesn’t even pass the laugh test let alone the evidence in that case. ===

    Ok. Where in the evidence did you find that Madigan asked for “no-show” jobs?


  11. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Nov 19, 24 @ 1:16 pm:

    ==you don’t really believe this was all just innocent recommendations with no expectations.==

    I don’t. But you have to prove it. I’ve not seen the “proof” yet.


  12. - SWSider - Tuesday, Nov 19, 24 @ 1:21 pm:

    There’s a certain level of karmic justice if the comically cautious MJM gets taken down because his buddy has a “crimes” section of his notebook.


  13. - SWSider - Tuesday, Nov 19, 24 @ 1:23 pm:

    == The onus is on the recipient of the recommendation to…==

    I have to say, this is the type of fuzzy, insane logic that the current Supreme Court might just go for.


TrackBack URI

Uncivil comments, profanity of any kind, rumors and anonymous commenters will not be tolerated and will likely result in banishment.



* Illinois Needs Energy Storage Now!
* Caption contest!
* r/movingtoillinois is an interesting read
* It’s just a bill
* Roundup: Madigan corruption trial
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller