It’s just a bill
Monday, Dec 2, 2024 - Posted by Isabel Miller
* Sen. Bill Cunningham…
I’m proud to represent the Chicago area’s working families and small businesses, which is why I introduced legislation that will help keep energy costs down and safeguard our future by modernizing the state’s energy grid.
Senate Bill 3959 is a critical solution that looks out for consumers and helps build the economy of tomorrow. My bill would prevent crippling energy rate hikes — an estimated $30 per month on electricity bills — while creating thousands of jobs, and ensuring we have a reliable and resilient energy grid that meets the needs of existing and future businesses in Illinois. […]
[I]mmediate legislative action is crucial because building large-scale energy solutions requires time. Illinois residents are already experiencing the consequences of projected energy shortfalls, as the July 2024 PJM Interconnection capacity auction caused an 833% spike in energy prices.
This surge is expected to raise power bills by up to $30 per month for millions of Illinois households in the PJM Interconnection region, which includes most of northern Illinois. My proposed legislation would tackle this issue by protecting consumers from unpredictable rate increases and offering incentives to accelerate the development of solar, wind and storage projects, creating a more diverse and reliable energy grid.
* SB3959’s synopsis…
Amends the Illinois Power Agency Act. Authorizes the Illinois Power Agency to (i) conduct competitive solicitations to procure contracted energy storage credits sufficient to achieve certain energy storage standards, and (ii) request, review, and accept proposals, execute contracts, and procure energy storage credits. Requires the Agency to develop a storage procurement plan. Authorizes the Agency to develop and implement a firm energy resource procurement plan. Makes other changes. Amends the Public Utilities Act. Requires each electric utility to demonstrate sufficient resources devoted to interconnection. Requires the Illinois Commerce Commission to perform specified actions regarding interconnection within 90 days after the effective date of the amendatory Act. In a provision regarding virtual power plant programs, requires each electric utility serving more than 300,000 customers as of January 1, 2023 to propose an initial tariff within 60 days after the effective date of the amendatory Act. In a provision regarding peak remediation programs, requires each electric utility serving more than 300,000 retail customers as of January 1, 2023 to propose an initial tariff within 90 days after the effective date of the amendatory Act. Requires the Commission to establish a working group with relevant stakeholders to develop a stand-alone energy storage distribution deployment program. Provides that, beginning on June 1, 2024, the electric utility shall be entitled to recover through tariffed charges all of the costs associated with the purchase of energy storage credits to meet specified energy storage standards. Requires the Agency to prepare an energy storage resources procurement plan for the procurement of energy storage credits. Requires the Commission to establish an Office of Interconnection and Renewable Development, which shall (i) actively seek input from all interested parties and shall develop a thorough understanding and critical analyses of the tools and techniques used to promote development and remove barriers to development of the projects and devices, and (ii) monitor interconnection between electric utilities and applicants for interconnection and interconnection customers.
The bill, introduced in May 2024, has yet to move out of Senate Assignments.
* The Tribune…
While Cunningham’s bill is technology agnostic, if passed soon, it will most likely rely on lithium-ion batteries: the same type that runs cellphones, laptops and electric cars.
Their price has dropped 99%, and performance has increased fivefold over the last three decades as China produces them at a tremendous scale. […]
All the lithium-ion batteries in the world collectively hold 1 terawatt of power, or 1 million megawatts. That’s just enough electricity to power the U.S. at peak energy consumption for one hour. Meanwhile, Meng estimates reaching net-zero emissions will require 200 to 300 terawatts worth of batteries globally.
The United States’ battery capacity is only slightly above 15,000 megawatts, with Illinois clocking in at 100 megawatts. The bill aims to increase the state’s battery capacity to 8,500 megawatts, enough to charge 130 million laptops.
“It’s a very deep hole,” said [Mark Pruitt, the former director of the Illinois Power Agency]. A new analysis from the Union of Concerned Scientists estimates Illinois will need at least 3,000 megawatts of storage in the next five years and over 9,000 megawatts by 2035. […]
If Illinois’ proposed bill is passed, residents can expect a small fee on their bill for five years. Savings will kick in around year six, according to Pruitt, totaling a net reduction of $3 billion on utility bills over the first 20 years. That’s an average cost savings of $4 to $7 per month per family.
Thoughts?
- Energy no brainer - Monday, Dec 2, 24 @ 10:04 am:
We either pass Cunningham’s bill or we won’t have enough capacity for the surge in demand and future economic development. This should help to keep future rate increases down and will help ensure we keep moving forward with the energy transition.
But even if you don’t believe in clean energy and the energy transition, you still want to pass the bill. Building energy storage saved the Texas and California grids this past summer. Without it, they would have seen periodic blackouts as they saw the previous years. This should be the ultimate bipartisan energy no-brainer.
- Donnie Elgin - Monday, Dec 2, 24 @ 10:59 am:
= a small fee on their bill for five years=
Battery tech is important and will develop over time based on market demands. This is only a semi-critical issue due to recent national and state environmental/public policy that has prioritized renewables over abundant natural gas and nuclear. There is also a considerable energy loss of 10-20% when energy is stored and then released via battery storage. Providing reliable baseload power removes the urgency.
- Center Drift - Monday, Dec 2, 24 @ 11:46 am:
This is a crisis of our own making. Passing legislation to take baseload generation offline without adequate replacement was the height of folly. Systemwide scaled storage is not the answer. It cannot be scaled up for reliability. We need more baseload. First, build more gas peaker generation. It’s quick and cleaner than anything. Next get more nuclear generation online. That can produce the baseload generation large scale electric systems need to ensure reliability. Let the science and business communities keep working on replacement generation but don’t take anything away in generation until they succeed in a new baseload generation source.
- Donnie Elgin - Monday, Dec 2, 24 @ 12:05 pm:
=This is a crisis of our own making=
Absolulty - Other states will be developing battery tech via hybrid generation where battery storage projects will be paired with existing gas-fired peaking generation. Unfortunately, JB’s Climate and Equitable Jobs Act (CEJA) prohibits any new gas plant. Cunninham’s bill also would prohibit gas battery hybrid with this language “stand-alone energy storage distribution deployment program”
- Telly - Monday, Dec 2, 24 @ 1:57 pm:
== national and state environmental/public policy that has prioritized renewables over abundant natural gas and nuclear. ==
Some truth to that, but not the full picture. Illinois subsidies the heck out of nuclear, and we should. But building new nukes is incredibly expensive. And coal-fired baseload began falling off line long before the latest round of environmental regulation. Peaker plants and batteries are the key going forward, particularly given the grid operators’ poor track record for getting renewable generation online.