Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Illinois Supreme Court: Raw cannabis smell is enough to trigger warrantless automobile searches
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Illinois Supreme Court: Raw cannabis smell is enough to trigger warrantless automobile searches

Thursday, Dec 5, 2024 - Posted by Rich Miller

* From back on September 19

The stench of smoked pot doesn’t give a police officer the right to search an adult’s car without a warrant, according to a new ruling from the Illinois Supreme Court.

The searches were allowed when marijuana was illegal in the state. But in a 6-0 opinion issued Thursday, justices say that changed when it became legal for adults in Illinois to use cannabis due to a change in state law.

“Since Jan 1, 2020, the use and possession of cannabis is presumptively lawful, subject to certain restrictions,” Justice Scott Neville wrote in deciding the case (The People v. Redmond). “We hold that the odor of burnt cannabis, alone, is insufficient to provide probably cause of police officers to perform a warrantless search of a vehicle.”

Still unresolved is how far police can go if they smell raw cannabis, in potential breach of a state law that requires cannabis to be stored in an odorless container when a car is moving. […]

“The odor of burnt cannabis is a fact that should be considered when determining whether police have probably cause to search a vehicle, but the odor of burnt cannabis, standing alone without other inculpatory facts, does not provide probable cause to search a vehicle,” Neville wrote.

The earlier ruling is here.

* Today

The smell of raw cannabis is grounds for police to search a vehicle, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

The decision runs counter to the court’s previous ruling that the smell of burnt cannabis by itself is not sufficient reason for a vehicle search.

The two rulings create a situation in which, though it is illegal to smoke pot in a vehicle, drivers are protected from a search based only on the smell of burnt cannabis, but are not protected from a search based on the smell of raw marijuana. […]

“In short, while cannabis is legal to possess generally, it is illegal to possess in a vehicle on an Illinois highway unless in an odor-proof container,” the court wrote in the Molina case. “The odor of raw cannabis strongly suggests that the cannabis is not being possessed within the parameters of Illinois law. And, unlike the odor of burnt cannabis, the odor of raw cannabis coming from a vehicle reliably points to when, where, and how the cannabis is possessed — namely, currently, in the vehicle, and not in an odor-proof container.”

Today’s ruling is here.

* From the statute in question in both cases

(625 ILCS 5/11-502.15)
Sec. 11-502.15. Possession of adult use cannabis in a motor vehicle.
(a) No driver may use cannabis within the passenger area of any motor vehicle upon a highway in this State.
(b) No driver may possess cannabis within any area of any motor vehicle upon a highway in this State except in a secured, sealed or resealable, odor-proof, child-resistant cannabis container that is inaccessible.
(c) No passenger may possess cannabis within any passenger area of any motor vehicle upon a highway in this State except in a secured, sealed or resealable, odor-proof, child-resistant cannabis container that is inaccessible.
(d) Any person who knowingly violates subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this Section commits a Class A misdemeanor.

* From the conclusion to today’s ruling

In sum, we hold that the odor of raw cannabis coming from a vehicle being operated on an Illinois highway, alone, is sufficient to provide police officers, who are trained and experienced in distinguishing between burnt and raw cannabis, with probable cause to perform a warrantless search of a vehicle. See Hill, 2020 IL 124595, ¶ 18 n.2 (“the smell and presence of cannabis undoubtedly remains a factor in a probable cause determination”). Our finding of probable cause is consistent with the Vehicle Code’s odor-proof container requirement. In other words, an officer trained and experienced in distinguishing between burnt and raw cannabis who smells the odor of raw cannabis in a vehicle stopped on the highway would logically suspect that there is cannabis in the vehicle that is not properly contained as required by the Vehicle Code. See 625 ILCS 5/11-502.15(b), (c) (West 2020). Therefore, the circuit court erred when it granted the motion suppressing the raw cannabis confiscated from Molina. Accordingly, we affirm the appellate court’s decision reversing the trial court’s order suppressing the evidence seized in the warrantless search of Molina’s car.

* Justices Mary K. O’Brien and Chief Justice Mary Jane Theis dissented

We have concluded that neither the odor of alcohol nor the odor of burnt cannabis, absent any other factor, is sufficient to establish probable cause to search a vehicle. We should reach the same conclusion as to raw cannabis: the odor of raw cannabis, absent any other factor, is not a sufficiently inculpatory fact that reliably points to when, where, or how the cannabis was possessed

       

27 Comments
  1. - charles in charge - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 2:17 pm:

    What an absurd result. Something tells me we’re about to see a bunch of bills filed on this.


  2. - Perrid - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 2:21 pm:

    So cops can still lie about what they smell, they just have to be very specific in their lies. Wonderful.


  3. - Strategy Geek - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 2:27 pm:

    If I may borrow from Lincoln’s storied quote about General Grant and whiskey, let’s find out what Justices Theis and O’Brien are smoking and order a round of that for the other justices because Theis and o’Brien clearly see through the smoke.


  4. - one toke over the line - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 2:29 pm:

    Any idea as to how many weed impaired drivers kill other motorists in a year? After all, if just one death or injury is prevented, then this is an outstanding decision


  5. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 2:34 pm:

    I have no idea how to distinguish between the smell of burnt and raw cannabis, and I do not think any amount of training can do that.


  6. - 47th Ward - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 2:38 pm:

    ===I have no idea how to distinguish between the smell of burnt and raw cannabis,…===

    I learned how to that in high school. Maybe it’s more experience than training, but it really isn’t that difficult.


  7. - TNR - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 2:40 pm:

    Confusing to say the least. Rather than focusing on vehicle searches, I’d prefer law enforcement simply issue tickets to motorists (and enforce DUI laws if necessary) to motorists who smoke weed. Based on what I smell during a regular drive around town, there’s way too much of that going on.


  8. - charles in charge - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 2:46 pm:

    ==Any idea as to how many weed impaired drivers kill other motorists in a year? After all, if just one death or injury is prevented, then this is an outstanding decision==

    Any idea how many people are killed by police in encounters that started with a pretextual vehicle search? Got any evidence showing that police searching vehicles based on supposedly smelling the odor of RAW cannabis does anything at all to reduce the incidence of impaired driving or vehicle crashes?


  9. - TheInvisibleMan - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 2:56 pm:

    “Our finding of probable cause is consistent with the Vehicle Code’s odor-proof container requirement.”

    Being in an odor-proof container, does not automatically mean the exterior of the container is not also going to smell like cannabis. It simply means the contents of the container are not going to contribute to the odor.

    While it would be rare for this to be the case immediately upon purchasing and leaving a dispensary, it is almost equally as not rare for an existing and in-use container to have acquired this odor. It’s not against the law for me to store my odor-proof container right next to raw unpackaged cannabis in my house. If I take that container into my vehicle, even after never opening it in the vehicle I will now be subject to a warrantless search even though at no point in this situation has a law been broken.


  10. - one toke over the line - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 2:59 pm:

    So the police are shooting people over weed absent any other actions on the part of the motorist? Is that what you are saying?

    Got proof of that?


  11. - jolietj - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 3:00 pm:

    Seems to me if you want to smuggle weed the best plan would be to be smoking at it the same time..?


  12. - DuPage Saint - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 3:04 pm:

    I can’t wait to see defense attorneys tests cops smelling abilities


  13. - Macoupin Manny - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 3:10 pm:

    One Toke Over the Line, Remember Philando Castile?

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/06/21/officer-who-shot-philando-castile-said-smell-of-marijuana-made-him-fear-for-his-life/


  14. - charles in charge - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 3:14 pm:

    ==So the police are shooting people over weed absent any other actions on the part of the motorist? Is that what you are saying?==

    No I’m saying that police encounters that should never have happened in the first place often turn violent or even fatal. It’s quite well documented.


  15. - HSI - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 3:29 pm:

    Todays cannabis is not what compressed bales smelled like 20 years ago. Its much stronger smell.

    Likewise, burned cannabis smells different and is easy to distinguish. After all, it’s been on fire. Kind of like the difference between the smell of a pile of raked up grass clippings and a pile of grass clippings that your neighbor is burning.

    I personally find the premise that if you legally smoke cannabis at home that somehow the car you drive will smell like burned weed is laughable. The esteemed justices are solving some mighty hypothetical concerns.


  16. - one toke over the line - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 3:30 pm:

    Is that the case where the officer was found not guilty and the motorist pulled or reached for a gun? I watched the video. No mention of weed. Do you know something the jury did not hear?


  17. - @misterjayem - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 3:35 pm:

    “if just one death or injury is prevented, then this is an outstanding decision”

    Far more than one death or injury would be prevented of we made automobiles illegal.

    Nevertheless, that would be foolish.

    IMHO, so was this ruling.

    “So cops can still lie about what they smell, they just have to be very specific in their lies.”

    Exactly so.

    – MrJM


  18. - HSI - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 3:36 pm:

    For fun: Does a car with a guy who just went to Portillo’s smell different than the guy who went through the drive through that has a couple beef and sausage sandwiches in a bag on the front seat?


  19. - Ak - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 3:37 pm:

    So I guess light a joint to mask the smell of raw weed when getting pulled over. It’s legal to possess weed. This is why we should all stop taking the court seriously. Show up in pajamas and eat your cheetos because it literally doesn’t matter.


  20. - Demoralized - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 4:02 pm:

    I’d rather the cops be able to search you for the smell of burnt cannabis. I for one am sick to death of that smell being everywhere when I go out in public.


  21. - Sir Reel - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 4:02 pm:

    For some reason, regarding this discussion, all I think about is Cheech and Chong exiting their van in a cloud of smoke.


  22. - Pundent - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 4:12 pm:

    =After all, if just one death or injury is prevented, then this is an outstanding decision=

    So searches based on the smell of raw weed will save lives?

    Got proof of that?


  23. - Macoupin Manny - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 4:16 pm:

    - One Toke- Last I checked the justice system isn’t perfect and only the cop said he was reaching for a weapon, Castile’s girlfriend didn’t see him reach for a gun, and seems odd to reach for a gun when your girlfriend and their 4 yo kid are sitting in the same car with you.

    Also, you may not have read that Castile’s murderer was dumped from the PD, and you know how that rarely happens. Last I heard, he couldn’t even get a job teaching because the Minnesota Teachers won’t license him because he doesn’t meet their moral code.

    But aren’t we digressing. You wanted to hear a situation where a cop killed someone related to marijuana, and just to be clear I provided proof that it’s happened. By the cops own admission, he feared for his life because he smelled pot.


  24. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 4:17 pm:

    ===After all, if just one death or injury is prevented, then this is an outstanding decision ===

    You should prolly rethink your uber-authoritarian mindset.


  25. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 4:20 pm:

    ===Maybe it’s more experience than training, but it really isn’t that difficult.===

    It smelt like weed to me when I was around burnt cannabis, and when I was around people holding way too much of it, which is when it really smells. It just smells like weed to me.


  26. - hisgirlfriday - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 4:52 pm:

    Very mystified how the majority reached this absurd result that encourages people who legally buy weed at dispensaries to light up in their cars to avoid the legal risk of getting pulled over with unsmoked weed on the way home.


  27. - Excitable Boy - Thursday, Dec 5, 24 @ 5:15 pm:

    - I for one am sick to death of that smell being everywhere when I go out in public. -

    So people should be hassled by police because you don’t like a smell? That’s nice.

    How about cops shouldn’t be able to search people based on smells alone, period. This is an absurd ruling.


TrackBack URI

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the holiday weekend
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - This just in...
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Transit fiefdoms ignored 2015 state deadline to streamline fares
* Question of the day
* Today's quotable
* Showcasing The Retailers Who Make Illinois Work
* It’s just a bill
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
January 2025
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller