* Politico…
The Agriculture Department has axed two programs that gave schools and food banks money to buy food from local farms and ranchers, halting more than $1 billion in federal spending.
Roughly $660 million that schools and child care facilities were counting on to purchase food from nearby farms through the Local Food for Schools Cooperative Agreement Program in 2025 has been canceled, according to the School Nutrition Association.
State officials were notified Friday of USDA’s decision to end the LFS program for this year. More than 40 states had signed agreements to participate in previous years, according to SNA and several state agencies.
The Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program, which supports food banks and other feeding organizations, has also been cut. USDA notified states that it was unfreezing funds for existing LFPA agreements but did not plan to carry out a second round of funding for fiscal year 2025.
In a statement, a USDA spokesperson confirmed that funding, previously announced last October, “is no longer available and those agreements will be terminated following 60-day notification.”
* The Hill…
Democratic governors are also objecting to the cuts, saying they will impact students and farmers alike.
“Cutting funds for these programs is a slap in the face to Illinois farmers and the communities they feed,” Gov. JB Pritzker said.
“The Trump Administration’s refusal to release grant funds doesn’t just hurt farmers in the program, it devastates our most vulnerable, food-insecure communities relying on meat, fresh produce and other nutritious donations.”
I asked and the governor’s office said the Illinois portion of this is roughly $27 million.
* The House Agriculture & Conservation Committee is having a hearing about this topic today in Room 115…
Investigating the negative impact of the USDA funding freeze, tariffs, and the delayed farm bill on Illinois Agriculture
…Adding… Illinois Department of Agriculture…
Illinois Department of Agriculture (IDOA) Director Jerry Costello II, along with key stakeholders representing farmers, research institutions, and food banks, appeared before the General Assembly’s House Agriculture & Conservation Committee hearing to discuss federal funding cuts and tariffs – which amount to taxes on working farmers.
Costello’s testimony in Springfield focused on several agreements between USDA and IDOA, including the Local Food Purchase Assistance Program (LFPA) and the Resilient Food Systems Infrastructure Program (RFSI). Illinois was the only state in the nation to prioritize socially disadvantaged farmers. These same farmers will lose over tens of millions of dollars in fair market value payments for crops and livestock they are currently raising as well as the ability to invest in infrastructure for growth and sustainability.
The purpose of the LFPA program is to “maintain and improve food and agricultural supply chain resiliency.” The cooperative agreements between USDA and states allow states “to procure and distribute local and regional foods and beverages that are healthy, nutritious … and meet the needs of the population.” The program was intended to serve “food banks and organizations that reach underserved communities” and would help “build and expand economic opportunity for local and underserved producers.”[1] The intent of the program is to target socially disadvantaged farmers.[2]
“LFPA was designed to support both ends of the food chain – farmers and those they feed. Cutting the funding leaves farmers on the hook for expenses they incurred believing they would be reimbursed and leaves our most vulnerable, food-insecure communities without meat, fresh produce and other nutritious donations they were promised,” said IDOA Director Jerry Costello II. “The federal government broke its promise, and the people of Illinois are paying the price.”
IDOA announced on January 17, 2025, an additional $14.7 million was awarded by the federal government for this program. The USDA recently announced the funds were terminated.
The purpose of the RFSI program is “to build resilience in the middle of the food supply chain, to provide more and better markets to small farms and food businesses. The RFSI program requires farmers to make upfront investments in input costs with the promise of grant dollars to reimburse them. Without those federal funds, the program is unable to operate.
The RFSI program would have provided $6.4 million in grant funds to build resilience in the middle of the food supply chain, supporting activities that happen after harvest and prior to retail such as processing, storing and transporting Illinois products. In recent surveys of Illinois farmers, infrastructure and equipment were identified as the greatest obstacle to creating local food systems.
“Governor Pritzker called the move ‘a slap in the face to Illinois farmers and the communities they feed’ and I couldn’t agree more,” Costello said. “These are federal funds that were passed by Congress, a coequal branch of government, signed into law, and promised to Illinois farmers. They have been cut with no explanation or timeline, and farmers are left to deal with the consequences.”
Other federal funding sources of concern are the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) which launched the successful Conservation Planner program creating a talent pipeline attracting a workforce to implement boots on the ground conservation measures; Specialty Crop Block Grants which funded research to increase the state’s competitiveness in the industry; the I-COVER program, a three-state initiative to encourage cover crop adoption and technology advances; and the agreement for state inspectors to ensure food safety at more than 190 meat and poultry processing plants in Illinois.
In addition to federal funding cuts, Costello explained to the committee the impact of Trump’s tariffs on Illinois farmers before testimony from industry groups and others.
Three countries – Canada, China and Mexico – account for 48% of all US agricultural exports, $91 billion of the total $191 billion exported annually.
Illinois is the third largest exporter of agricultural products in the nation. Illinois farmers export $2 billion in products to Canada; $2.9 billion to Mexico and $1.9 billion to China.
“These tariffs are an attack on Illinois farmers. Countries forced to pay them may simply find new trade partners beyond the U.S.,” Costello said. “Illinois farmers are then left to struggle with shrinking markets on top of rising costs and declining crop prices.”
- Captain Obvious - Tuesday, Mar 11, 25 @ 2:39 pm:
Seems like the state could step in and fund this worthwhile program. $27 mil is the equivalent of a rounding error .00049% of the budget. Should be no problem.
- TheInvisibleMan - Tuesday, Mar 11, 25 @ 2:46 pm:
“Should be no problem.”
Well, that LGDF fund is just sitting there doing nothing useful.
- Chicago Voter - Tuesday, Mar 11, 25 @ 2:58 pm:
The definition of what any rainy day fund should be used for.
I can’t imagine this assault on kids’ food programs will end with this first attempt, what will be the plans for school districts that rely heavily on the community eligibility provision and other food funds?
- Rich Miller - Tuesday, Mar 11, 25 @ 3:05 pm:
===definition of what any rainy day fund should be used for===
lol
Touch that for this and we’ll get downgraded for sure.
- JS Mill - Tuesday, Mar 11, 25 @ 3:06 pm:
=$27 mil is the equivalent of a rounding error .00049% of the budget.=
It is 0.0000135% of $2 trillion that the richest man in the world want to cut from the federal government. Seems like a ridiculous cut and “should be no problem” for the fed to keep funding.
Care to comment on a guy with $400 billion cutting meals for poor kids?
I’ll wait.
- Anyone Remember - Tuesday, Mar 11, 25 @ 3:19 pm:
===Care to comment on a guy with $400 billion cutting meals for poor kids?===
His childhood hero growing up in South Africa was “Maggie Thatcher the Milk Snatcher” ??
- JS Mill - Tuesday, Mar 11, 25 @ 4:17 pm:
=I can’t imagine this assault on kids’ food programs will end with this first attempt, what will be the plans for school districts that rely heavily on the community eligibility provision and other food funds?=
CEP does not work the way people think it does. BUt a partial answer to your question is that they are increasing the eligibility for CEP from 40% to 60% free/reduced. So they are already cutting people out of free meals from FSLP.
- Chicago voter - Tuesday, Mar 11, 25 @ 5:03 pm:
I do understand CEP already increased its floor.
It is already a nightmare for the school districts that have to deal with this, across the country. No urban district thinks it is safe in the long term and understand the raised floor is only a test to socialize closing down the USDA run provision.
What will Illinois plan be for districts that benefit from CEP above 60%?
for those who are curious to see the districts/schools that benefit now, it’s a public searchable database
https://frac.org/community-eligibility-database/
- Captain Obvious - Tuesday, Mar 11, 25 @ 6:27 pm:
JS - Yes it’s kind of like a guy with however many billion Jay Bob has cutting off healthcare to poor immigrants.
- ItsJustMe - Tuesday, Mar 11, 25 @ 9:02 pm:
What surprises me is countries like Canada, Mexico, EU coutnries, etc haven’t moved to cut all ties with the US (ex: no imports, no exports, etc) and just wait it out until MAGA is gone.
It stops Trump, the shyster businessman, dead in his tracks and there go all the supporters.
- Rich Miller - Tuesday, Mar 11, 25 @ 10:47 pm:
===countries like Canada, Mexico, EU coutnries, etc haven’t moved to cut all ties===
You do realize we are the largest economy in the world, right?