Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Question of the day
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Tuesday, Jul 1, 2025 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Press release…

U.S. Term Limits (USTL), the leader in the national, non-partisan movement to limit terms for elected officials, is gathering support from state lawmakers across the nation. Its mission is to get 34 states to apply for an amendment proposal convention specific to term limits on Congress. 2025 Illinois state house Rep. Sonya Harper (district 6), has committed support for term limits on Congress by signing the term limits convention pledge.

The U.S. Term Limits pledge is provided to candidates and members of state legislatures. It reads, “I pledge that, as a member of the state legislature, I will cosponsor, vote for, and defend the resolution applying for an Article V convention for the sole purpose of enacting term limits on Congress.”

In the 1995 case, Thornton v. U.S. Term Limits, the Supreme Court of the United States opined that only a Constitutional Amendment could limit the terms of U.S. Senators and House Representatives. According to Nick Tomboulides, Chief Executive Officer of USTL, the best chance of imposing term limits on Congress is through an Article V Proposal Convention of state legislatures.

“The Constitution allows for amendments to be proposed by either 2/3 of Congress or 2/3 of the states. While we’d like for Congress to take the high road and propose term limits on itself, we know they are too self-interested to do that without external pressure.” said Tomboulides. “That is why it is important to get buy-in from state legislators,” he added. Once proposed, the amendment must be ratified by 38 states.”

Tomboulides noted, “More than 87% of Americans have rejected the career politician model and want to replace it with citizen leadership. The way to achieve that goal is through a congressional term limits amendment. Sonya knows this and is willing to work to make sure we reach our goal.”

According to the latest nationwide poll on term limits conducted by Pew Research, term limits enjoy wide bipartisan support. Pew’s analysis states, “An overwhelming majority of adults (87%) favor limiting the number of terms that members of Congress are allowed to serve. This includes a majority 56% who strongly favor this proposal, just 12% are opposed.”

* The Question: Do you support a national constitutional convention to enact term limits for Congress? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.


       

32 Comments »
  1. - LM - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 12:55 pm:

    Term limits on a legislative body risks making lobbyists the primary sources of “institutional memory.” I’d rather that institutional memory remain in the hands of elected officials that have to make their case to the voters every 2 (or 6) years


  2. - ArchPundit - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 1:04 pm:

    Term limits are a horrible idea that lead to much too much reliance on lobbyists and organized groups for expertise and experience.

    A Con-Con is also a horrible idea as it won’t be limited to term limits and right now I don’t think the country is in a position to make rational changes.


  3. - Huh? - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 1:16 pm:

    No. A constitutional convention wouldn’t be limited to the question of term limits. The unthinkable can of worms that would be opened would utterly destroy our republican democracy.


  4. - Just Me 2 - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 1:22 pm:

    I’ve never supported term limits. It is a solution to a symptom of a larger problem, which is our elections aren’t fair. I’d rather focus on the underlying problem with campaign finance and redistricting reforms.


  5. - I-55 Fanatic - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 1:29 pm:

    Hard no. In the words of Jed Bartlet: “We have term limits. They’re called elections.”

    Voters decide when their representative needs to change. Not only don’t we need term limits, but members of Congress should be paid much, much more. The competition to be a member of Congress should be ruthlessly fierce, and their compensation and career opportunities within Congress should reflect that. The people, through Congress, run the government. Not lobbyists and special interests, who would gain tremendous sway if members were booted just as soon as they start getting good at being in Congress.


  6. - Dotnonymous x - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 1:32 pm:

    I’ll be happy if there are elections…period.


  7. - 47th Ward - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 1:32 pm:

    Term limits? No. Redistricting reform nationally? Yes. Fair maps would help solve the problem the term limits idea is trying to solve.


  8. - Perrid - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 1:37 pm:

    Once they open Pandora’s box who knows what’ll come out of it. It won’t just be one thing, everyone will be fighting to change what the constitution says about… everything, really.

    But to stay on topic, no I don’t really care about career politicians or term limits. I honestly think voters should be the limit, as untrustworthy as voters are.

    If we wanted to tackle gerrymandering somehow, I think that’d do more to deal with this “problem”.


  9. - Incandenza - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 1:38 pm:

    The only term limits we need are on Supreme Court Justices. Term limits in the legislature is a way to water down the power of the people, and elevate the power of special interests.


  10. - DuPage Saint - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 1:40 pm:

    No I am against term limits that is why we have elections. However I would love to see age limits. If you can’t fly a commercial airplane at 65 you should not be in the federal government either. Congress, Judicial or Executive


  11. - Friendly Bob Adams - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 1:45 pm:

    A convention would be a disaster as there’s no way it could be constrained to just one topic. Let the people decide who their representatives should be.

    Incandenza- I’m with you on the supreme court limits, but not sure about how that’s set up in the constitution.


  12. - Save Ferris - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 1:57 pm:

    Not without term limits for staffers. We would then end up with unelected staffs with the figurehead electeds doing nothing but fundraising and voting however their chief of staff tells them to vote for.

    There are two ways to get the professional elected class out. 1) non-partisan jungle primaries with automatic runoff voting; and 2) No paychecks for elected officials. No healthcare. No pension. It’s volunteer.


  13. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 2:00 pm:

    ===No paychecks for elected officials. No healthcare. No pension. It’s volunteer.===

    In other words, only the wealthy may apply.


  14. - Save Ferris - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 2:00 pm:

    Adding in about SCOTUS limits. I’m good with 18 years on the bench and then done. Also, I’m all for a constitutional amendment for age limits. No one elected or appointed after age 78, no one elected or appointed to serve after age 80.


  15. - Save Ferris - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 2:03 pm:

    “In other words, only the wealthy may apply.”

    I had this exact discussion with Elliot Richardson years ago. My response then is the same as it is now: We’re already there.

    I suppose you could go completely the opposite. Salaries of say, $2,000,000 per year or more. Make an incentive for people who would never run to run. But volunteer representation is a better solution, IMO.


  16. - @misterjayem - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 2:07 pm:

    This proposal is a reckless procedure in the service of a bad idea.

    – MrJM


  17. - Candy Dogood - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 2:09 pm:

    ===Do you support a national constitutional convention to enact term limits for Congress?===

    No. Term limits are a bad idea. Look at the joke that Nebraska’s legislature has become.

    ===My response then is the same as it is now: We’re already there.===

    Please ignore the multimillionaire bragging about how he isn’t having to self fund.

    Double no. This is a trick. Constitutional Convention for Term Limits turns into a Constitutional Convention that weakens or destroys civil rights and civil liberties in an effort to turn our Constitutional Republic into a theocratic dictatorship.


  18. - Linus - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 2:10 pm:

    == “We have term limits. They’re called elections.”==

    Agree entirely. Term limits are an overly simplistic reaction to an overly complicated set of problems.


  19. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 2:12 pm:

    ===My response then is the same as it is now: We’re already there.===

    That is simply not true. Your cynicism is crowding out facts.

    Do you think, for just an example, Delia Ramirez or Lauren Underwood or Tammy Duckworth could serve without any recompense?

    You’re nuts.


  20. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 2:12 pm:

    Also, you’re off topic.


  21. - 40,000 ft - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 2:13 pm:

    red herring


  22. - Anyone Remember - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 2:14 pm:

    No.

    Term limits are nothing more than an attempt to permanently kneecap the other side’s people who are better than you side’s. (With a wee bit of “dislike” thrown in - Ernie Chambers, Willie Brown).


  23. - ZC - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 2:29 pm:

    I think term limits rests on this fundamental, Mr-Smith-Goes-to-Washington fable, that politicians all go to Springfield or DC as these bright wide-eyed Jimmy Stewarts, and then they all slowly morph into Claude Rains, so you need term limits to automatically sweep them out and usher in the next cohort of Jimmy Stewarts. But in truth these are adults and they’re pretty much whatever they were, the first day they took their oath of office. If they were good they still try to be good, if they were bad they’re bad. But term limits is not going to fundamentally change the character of who serves in office, except as everyone has noted they will know a lot less about process and policy.


  24. - Anon324 - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 2:43 pm:

    If 87% of people truly believed in term limits, then the elections wouldn’t come out the way they do. What is always left unsaid is that they actually want term limits for other people’s representatives, but they feel their own are doing great.

    And as others have pointed out, an Article V convention cannot actually be limited like USTL is proposing. And color me skeptical of the motives of any organization which involves a relative and former IPI flunky of John Tillman as COO.


  25. - Save Ferris - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 3:06 pm:

    “Do you think, for just an example, Delia Ramirez or Lauren Underwood or Tammy Duckworth could serve without any recompense?

    You’re nuts.”

    No, I don’t. But many of them can. As to being off topic, I don’t think we need term limits and I believe one way to get rid of career politicians is to not pay them, i.e. they’ll self term limit.

    As to me being nuts, sure. Appreciate the compliment.


  26. - clec dcn - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 3:13 pm:

    I voted no I don’t see any need. If they keep getting elected, then really is that the fault of the person who runs? Naturally I wonder how some keep getting elected but that is just me. Leave it alone if congress wants to do something leave it to them.


  27. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 3:22 pm:

    ===But many of them can===

    And therefore all members of congress should be like them?

    Again, that’s nuts.


  28. - Matty - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 3:42 pm:

    I do not support term limits. Full stop. Term limits for leadership positions, sure, but I value institutional knowledge and the ability to legislate like a mature adult.


  29. - Yooper in Diaspora - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 3:44 pm:

    I too voted no. What would it take for the wider public to become aware of the good reasons described in these comments for opposing term limits for senators and representatives (and for using a constitutional change to achieve them)?


  30. - Leslie K - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 3:53 pm:

    I inexplicably accidentaly voted yes when I meant no. No for reasons already mentioned–it gives more control to the lobbyists, and staff, and it couldn’t be limited to that question.


  31. - Lurker - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 4:00 pm:

    Meh, on term limits as I do not feel strongly one way or the other (I voted yes because I think it works fine for POTUS). Now age limits? I support 100%. Cannot be elected unless you’ll start your term prior to reaching 70 (and that includes POTUS).


  32. - Streator Curmudgeon - Tuesday, Jul 1, 25 @ 4:11 pm:

    == “We have term limits. They’re called elections.”==

    I voted yes. Let’s debunk this old myth.

    All of us would rather vote for a lousy incumbent of the party we prefer than for a promising newcomer of the party we don’t like.

    If this were not true, how do so many lousy incumbents keep getting elected over and over? Or is it because we won’t admit our own party’s incumbent is a hack?

    It’s so rare for an incumbent to be voted out that they can be lousy and tone-deaf with impunity.

    Congress may have the lowest approval ratings in 100 years, but we will not vote for the other party’s candidates to limit the terms of stinkers.

    We just won’t.


TrackBack URI

Anonymous commenters, uncivil comments, rumor-mongering, disinformation and profanity of any kind will be deleted.

(required)

(not required)



* Trump admin freezes $240 million in grants for Illinois K-12 schools
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* SB 328: Separating Lies From Truth
* Comptroller Mendoza: All GRF bills released, $1.9 billion in the bank, pension payments will be made early
* Question of the day
* Catching up with the federal candidates
* More proof that the Tribune editorial board doesn't read or trust its own newspaper
* Today's graphs: Mixed success for Pritzker
* Pritzker announces Christian Mitchell as LG pick (Updated)
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2025
June 2025
May 2025
April 2025
March 2025
February 2025
January 2025
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller