Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Madigan/McClain trial coverage roundup
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Madigan/McClain trial coverage roundup

Thursday, Oct 10, 2024 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Click here to follow along in real time. CBS 2

Both Madigan and McClain were in court Wednesday during jury selection, where attorneys made a small dent in questioning around 180 potential jurors.

U.S. District Judge John Robert Blakey warned that attorneys would have to adjust their timelines if questioning continued at such a slow rate.

Some questions potential jurors were asked included:

    • Whether they feel like there’s an issue with the political system in Illinois.
    • Whether they feel that lobbying is a bad thing.
    • Whether they feel politicians shouldn’t mix business and politics.
    • Whether they could consider the evidence regardless of their personal feelings about the Democratic Party in Illinois?

How would you answer those questions?

* Related…

    * Questioning or juror panel continues in Madigan corruption trial as both sides seek to weed out bias: U.S. District Judge John Robert Blakey has given the parties wide leeway in their questioning and said he will not put a time limit on the process. But before taking a mid-morning break, he told the lawyers that at their current pace, they will not get to opening statements until the week after next, which will extend the trial beyond the 10 weeks originally scheduled. “I am not going to rush you guys at all. I’m not,” Blakey said. “It’s an important process, and it’s going to take as long as it needs to take. But if the trial is going to be 11 weeks, we need to let the jurors know that.”

    * Michael Madigan meets a few of the people who could decide his fate — just 3 jurors chosen: Two men and one woman were the first to be chosen as jurors in the racketeering conspiracy trial of former Illinois House Speaker Michael J. Madigan on Wednesday, launching a selection process that got off to a slow start. One is an educator. Another works for Amazon. And the third says he works in insurance. Now, they’ll help decide the fate of one of the most powerful politicians in Illinois history. That man, Madigan, spent the day listening to lawyers interview potential jurors, including one person who said Madigan had a reputation for “doing things his way” and for being involved in “shady dealings.” He was excused from the panel.

    * Three jurors selected so far to hear evidence in Madigan corruption trial: McClain, who had not been to the courthouse since his conviction in May 2023 in the related “ComEd Four” bribery case, sat at a table behind Madigan for most of the proceedings. The two longtime friends only seemed to acknowledge each other once in the courtroom, when, after a break, Madigan could be seen offering a half-wave, which McClain returned with a smile. … The third person selected, Juror 16, said flat-out he did not want to participate, but he was selected anyway. An insurance underwriter with three school-age kids, he grew up in the 19th Ward and said he knows Ald. Matt O’Shea but is not particularly political. He said he most recently went to O’Shea’s office for a block party permit. Asked if it was successful, the juror replied, “It was a good party.”

    * Several jurors chosen, but process slow-going in Mike Madigan corruption trial jury selection: “An impartial jury is always difficult in a case like this because everybody is going to have heard about the case. Anyone who says they haven’t heard about the case is probably lying. Anyone who said they haven’t heard about at least Michael Madigan is probably lying,” criminal defense attorney Steve Greenberg said. “You want to endear yourself to the jurors. So, both sides are going to be talking to them. They’re going to want to be likable. They’re going to use some humor when they’re asking questions. They’re going to try and relate to the jurors.”

       

15 Comments
  1. - Donnie Elgin - Thursday, Oct 10, 24 @ 12:13 pm:

    =How would you answer those questions?=

    “yes” to all of the above


  2. - 47th Ward - Thursday, Oct 10, 24 @ 12:27 pm:

    ===The third person selected, Juror 16, said flat-out he did not want to participate, but he was selected anyway.===

    That’s not the way to get out of jury duty. Judges hate that. A better approach is to strongly imply or even directly say that you cannot be impartial, that you have always had a strong bias for (or against) the prosecution. It’s just your nature to believe prosecutors always tell the truth and defendants always lie.

    That works every time.


  3. - Give Us Barrabbas - Thursday, Oct 10, 24 @ 12:28 pm:

    Lobbying gets a bad rap because so many lobbyists have been breaking the rules. Fundamentally, a lobbyist is just a point person for a particular cause, who brings information and opinions to the table. But that’s been warped into something else.

    In the question of politics and business, he’s caught dead to rights using his position to steer business his way. I don’t insist politicians be unemployed elsewhere, but clearly, they have to recuse themselves from anything related to their other business. That should also mean politicians with farms should not be voting on ag policy .


  4. - Candy Dogood - Thursday, Oct 10, 24 @ 12:37 pm:

    ===Whether they feel like there’s an issue with the political system in Illinois===

    I’m not really sure I understand the question. Can you be more specific?

    ===Whether they feel that lobbying is a bad thing.===

    No, lobbying isn’t a bad thing.

    ===Whether they feel politicians shouldn’t mix business and politics.===

    I think that depends a lot on the specific details.

    ===Whether they could consider the evidence regardless of their personal feelings about the Democratic Party in Illinois?===

    How I feel about any organization has nothing to do with whether or not evidence has been presented proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

    From what I understand of jury selection, my back ground would most likely cause me to be eliminated from most jury selection pools.


  5. - Suburban Mom - Thursday, Oct 10, 24 @ 12:57 pm:

    “• Whether they feel that lobbying is a bad thing.
    • Whether they feel politicians shouldn’t mix business and politics.”

    This feels like a lawyer tipping his hand about his strategy.


  6. - Mr Ed - Thursday, Oct 10, 24 @ 1:02 pm:

    Why select a juror who doesn’t want to participate?


  7. - Payback - Thursday, Oct 10, 24 @ 1:09 pm:

    “Whether they feel like there’s an issue with the political system in Illinois.” What does that even mean, “issue?” That’s a pretty broad question.

    If I was in the room and had to answer that question honestly, I’d probably reply that it’s sad that Illinois residents have to rely on federal prosecutors to do their dirty laundry, rather than having a state legal system that could ensure honest government. At that point I suppose I’d be asked to leave.


  8. - lake county democrat - Thursday, Oct 10, 24 @ 1:41 pm:

    yes
    neutral (mixed)
    Yes
    yes


  9. - Rudy’s teeth - Thursday, Oct 10, 24 @ 1:54 pm:

    My answer would include see Rod Blagojevich former governor, convict, and recipient of a pardon by former President Trump.


  10. - Cheswick - Thursday, Oct 10, 24 @ 2:08 pm:

    • I feel the system works the way it is set up to work.
    • My dear friend’s husband is a lobbyist for his organization. I believe in the value of a good lobbyist is necessary. But not evil.
    • it’s unavoidable, probably.
    • definitely.


  11. - Leslie K - Thursday, Oct 10, 24 @ 2:13 pm:

    I’ve been on both sides of lobbying (lobbyist and staff attorney, never an elected), as I’m sure many here have been. Done ethically, it is an important educational process. No single person is likely to understand the nuance of every industry/interest seeking legislative change. As staff, my position changed on numerous occasions after speaking with a lobbyist (not always in their favor).

    But so many people have a visceral negative reaction to the term, even if they know nothing else about government or politics. Definitely a jury selection challenge here (I know, stating the obvious).


  12. - Garfield Ridge Guy - Thursday, Oct 10, 24 @ 2:13 pm:

    • Whether they feel like there’s an issue with the political system in Illinois.

    Yes, which is true of all units of government.

    • Whether they feel that lobbying is a bad thing.

    No. Exercises of the First Amendment cannot definitionally be bad.

    • Whether they feel politicians shouldn’t mix business and politics.

    No. This cannot be done.

    • Whether they could consider the evidence regardless of their personal feelings about the Democratic Party in Illinois?

    I don’t think humans are psychologically capable of this, so no.


  13. - Downstate - Thursday, Oct 10, 24 @ 2:24 pm:

    • Issue with the political system in Illinois. YES

    • Lobbying is a bad thing. NO

    • Shouldn’t mix business and politics. YES. I’m on several boards, some of which do business with the other entity. I’m always mindful of which hat I’m wearing. As a board member, not unlike an elected official, I have a duty of loyalty. And it is incumbent to disclose any conflicts at the outset of service and when they may arise.

    • Whether they could consider the evidence regardless of their personal feelings about the Democratic Party in Illinois? YES


  14. - Darren Bailey's Blowtorch - Thursday, Oct 10, 24 @ 2:39 pm:

    I agree with Leslie K (”done ethically, it is an important educational process”). It would be impossible for a small group of legislators to know everything affecting the lives of millions of people. Lobbyists bring important issues to their attention. That said, lobbying disclosure requirements are also important for transparency.


  15. - quad cities - Thursday, Oct 10, 24 @ 3:02 pm:

    Last time I saw former Speaker Madigan and Mike McClain together they were dining in their favorite booth at Saputo’s


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* The coming hit to hospitals
* SB 328: Separating Lies From Truth
* Planned Parenthood of Illinois eyes $16M gap if Medicaid cuts proceed: “Closures are not off the table”
* Pritzker administration lays out impact of budget reconciliation law on Illinois
* RETAIL: The Largest Employer In Illinois
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2025
June 2025
May 2025
April 2025
March 2025
February 2025
January 2025
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller