* I don’t know anything more about this than what’s in the release, but obviously there is gonna be some issues raised tomorrow. I’ll see if the governor’s office wants to respond, so stay tuned…
PRESS CONFERENCE: FRIDAY, 9:00 AM
GROUP TO RAUNER: ILLINOIS GOV’T IS NOT A DICTATORSHIP!
Coalition Sheds Light On Governor’s Back-Door Move for Massive Charter Expansion, Demands Rejection of Federal Funds
WHAT: Parents, community organizations, school board members and elected officials will join together before the Illinois State Board of Education (ISBE) meeting on Friday, November 20th at 9am to protest the undemocratic decision making from ISBE to expand charter schools in Illinois without public input.
ISBE applied for and received a federal grant of $42.5 million to open 48 new charter schools – 24 for Chicago over the next 5 years and 24 for the rest of the state. But the grant only covers start-up funding, with no funds to run schools once they open, thus cannibalizing the same inadequate public dollars funding existing schools.
Legislators will call for a hearing on how and why the state pursued this grant, and community leaders will urge a rejection of these dollars at a time when districts can scarcely fund the schools they already have.
.
WHEN: Friday, November 20, 2015, 9:00 a.m.
WHERE: James R. Thompson Center – Blue Room (15th floor)
100 W. Randolph Street
WHY: The ISBE applied for and received a federal grant of $42.5 million to open 48 new charter schools, 24 in Chicago over the next five years and 24 across the rest of Illinois. Coalition members are demanding to know how this one-time, non-sustainable funding is justified given current state and education financial crisis.
WHO: Brighton Park Neighborhood Council, Kenwood Oakland Community Organization, Chicago League of Women Voters, Raise Your Hand for IL Public Education, Parents4Teachers, Northwest Side Housing Center, Northern IL Jobs with Justice, Women Gathering for Justice, school board members from outside of Chicago
Elected Officials: State Senator Willie Delgado, State Rep Will Guzzardi, State Rep Lashawn Ford, State Rep Sonya Harper, State Rep Ann Williams, Alderman Rick Munoz.
54 Comments
|
* Sun-Times…
[Melineh Kano, executive director of Refugee One] said Wednesday that 21 Syrian refugees have been approved by the federal government to enter the United States and are currently waiting in other countries — such as Egypt and Lebanon — for travel and living arrangements to be finalized before coming to Illinois. It’s unclear how the process will play out in light of Rauner’s announcement.
In the 12-month period ending in July, 131 Syrian refugees were resettled in Illinois, mostly in the Chicago area, Kano said. […]
Out of the approximately 800,000 refugees who have been resettled in the United States since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, only three individuals have been detained and questioned by authorities for questionable affiliations — detainments that have not resulted in convictions, she said. […]
Jessica H. Darrow, a University of Chicago lecturer who has made a career out of studying refugee issues, said that attempting to use refugee status as a ruse for terrorist activity would be extremely hard to do.
“These people end up in a camp type setting with nothing, in a tent, sometimes for 10 years at a time,” she said. “It’s a pretty tough journey to travel and have that be a false route.”
She also said security screeners rely on skepticism until proven wrong when examining the back stories of potential refugees. Screeners, she said, look at it like this: “OK, you’re here in this chair trying to game the system and gain access to our country under false premises, and we’re going to believe that until you can prove to us that you’re not lying.”
I personally know several people (Iraqis) who’ve immigrated here under the refugee program. The process is not easy, to say the least.
* Press release…
WASHINGTON— Today, Congressman Peter Roskam (IL-06) released the following statement after House passage of H.R. 4038, the America Security Against Foreign Enemies (SAFE) Act, which pauses the Obama Administration’s refugee resettlement program:
“The first and most important Constitutional duty of the federal government is protect the homeland. Last week’s tragic massacre in Paris was a wake-up call. In the days since, ISIS has declared its intention to carry out terrorist attacks on Washington, D.C. and New York City. This bill is simple: pause the refugee resettlement program until the Administration can verify with 100 percent certainty that we know who exactly is entering our country and what their intentions are. The bipartisan vote today proves that this is not a partisan issue—this is a national security issue. President Obama should do the right thing and sign this bill into law to ensure the continued safety of all Americans.”
* I’ve asked Congressman Roskam’s staff how any government can guarantee anything with “100 percent certainty.” You will recall that US Sen. Mark Kirk quickly backed off his demand for “100 percent assurances” yesterday when I pressed the issue.
I’ve also asked Congressman Bob Dold’s staff to explain the same thing regarding his demand for “absolute certainty.” So far, I’ve received only a snarky off the record response. It didn’t please me.
I’ll let you know if either man responds.
*** UPDATE *** From a Congressman Dold aide…
The only thing that’s guaranteed as of now, according the President’s own FBI Director, is that the United States does not currently have the ability to thoroughly vet the backgrounds of people claiming to be Syrian refugees. Today a bipartisan, veto proof majority of the House told the Administration that they need to fix these problems to protect the American people. In the wake of vicious ISIS attacks that have slaughtered hundreds in Paris, Beirut and in the Sinai, the notion that Members of Congress shouldn’t be demanding far better from our government is preposterous.
Move to strike as non-responsive.
[ *** End Of Update *** ]
* It’s not that I oppose the bill that passed the US House today. I don’t know enough about it either way, and some congressmen in the president’s own party are clearly frustrated with non-cooperation from the White House on this issue.
I don’t even oppose the concept of a temporary pause in Syrian refugees while the program is given a once-over. The allegations by some of playing into the hands of the terrorists just because some folks want to circle back and check the strength of the doors is just way over the top, as is this…
Defying Gov. Bruce Rauner and his chicken-hearted closed border policy for Syrian refugees in the aftermath of the Paris terrorist attacks, Burke and his fellow aldermen sent a loud message that Chicago will not join in the fear-mongering.
The chest thumping on both sides is beyond ridiculous.
* How about we all get back to something that we have some control over, like the budget? Remember that?
A whole lot more Illinoisans are being hurt by that problem than could ever be hurt by a few refugees.
49 Comments
|
Remap group staffs up
Thursday, Nov 19, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Press release…
In preparation for a 2016 ballot referendum on Illinois legislative redistricting reform, the Independent Maps coalition on Thursday announced the addition of Hilltop Public Solutions as campaign consultant and Dave Mellet as campaign manager.
“With the petition drive on target to meet our goal of 600,000 signatures, we now can begin to gear up for a larger education campaign and the expansion of our statewide network of volunteers,” said Dennis FitzSimons, Chair of Independent Maps. “Our campaign is well underway, and we have added two seasoned veterans of statewide campaigns to help lead us to victory at the polls in 2016.”
Hilltop Public Solutions specializes in coalition building and managing high-stakes, high-profile campaigns by using the strategies and tactics it takes to win modern campaigns.
“Hilltop’s Bill Hyers, who managed New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s 2013 campaign and has extensive campaign experience across the country, will lead the Hilltop team in Illinois for the Independent Map Amendment,” FitzSimons said. “Hyers, who has been named a rising star by Politics magazine, has a reputation as one of the top campaign managers and political strategists in the United States.”
“Its time to bring fair elections back to Illinois, and I’m thrilled to be a part of this talented and experienced team,” Hyers said. “For too long, voters in Illinois have suffered from a partisan process that has called into question the very concept of fair elections. With the gridlock in Springfield, now more than ever Illinoisans need an open, transparent government that puts people before politics.”
Hilltop’s Elizabeth Lucas will be part of the team assisting Independent Maps. Lucas, founder of The Initiative Group, has worked on and advised hundreds of ballot initiatives around the country. She served as Political Director at the Ballot Initiative Strategy Center and field director for the Ohio Democratic Party against the anti-union SB5, a statewide voter referendum defeated by an overwhelming majority in 2011. She also has served as State Director of Organizing for America in Pennsylvania and on several presidential and state-level campaigns in battleground states.
“Dave Mellet, who was campaign manager for former Lt. Gov. Sheila Simon’s 2014 campaign for comptroller, will be our campaign manager and execute the non-partisan coalition’s campaign strategy,” FitzSimons said.
Mellet has worked on state and local campaigns for close to 10 years. After receiving a master’s degree in public administration from the University of Pennsylvania, Mellet started his career working on Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell’s successful 2006 reelection campaign. He went on to staff and manage campaigns for mayor, city council, state senate, and alderman. He has lived in Illinois for several years, working as a staffer for a direct mail firm and as the campaign manager for Simon last year.
Cindi Canary, who has been serving as executive director since June, will continue in that position during a transition period through the end of the year, when she will become a senior consultant to our board.
“Cindi’s leadership has been key to expanding our base of volunteers and putting us ahead of schedule on our signature collection timeline,” FitzSimons said. “She also helped us recruit and interview campaign manager and consultant candidates, and we’re pleased that she will remain very much involved.”
Anybody have any insights on these new folks?
39 Comments
|
Question of the day
Thursday, Nov 19, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Some headlines from today…
* Service agencies face uncertain future without state budget: “People who are most affected currently are the most vulnerable,” said Jean Pierce of Geneva, vice president of the league. “The state ended funding for services that help 75,000 survivors of domestic violence in Illinois. Many people will have to choose between staying in violent homes or becoming homeless.”
* Taxing is more responsible than borrowing: And if you think truly conservative elected officials won’t find creative ways to borrow to spend, well, think again. Just last week Governor Bruce Rauner’s administration revealed a plan to borrow up to $115 million from the Illinois Finance Authority — to cover basic operating expenses, like buying food for prison inmates. Governor Rauner is pretty conservative, and the Authority isn’t in the business of funding current services. In fact, according to its strategic plan, the Illinois Finance Authority exists to provide capital project “financing to 501(c)(3) nonprofits and private sector companies.” Let’s see, Illinois state government is neither a 501(c)(3) nonprofit nor a private sector company, and buying food for prison inmates isn’t a capital project, but the state’s short on revenue, so. …
* Cuts, tuition increasing as Richland deal with budget concerns
* SWIC approves belt-tightening measures in wake of state budget standoff
* Streator High raising property taxes: To get ahead of legislation in Springfield for a proposed property tax freeze, Streator Township High School is asking for the maximum it can without a truth-in-taxation hearing.
* Dementia care suffering as a result of budget impasse
* On November 2nd, Rep. Scott Drury sent this e-mail to his constituents…
Friends:
Between 1976 and 2015, the federal government failed to timely pass a budget on 18 separate occasions. The longest period without a federal budget was 21 days. Yesterday, Illinois entered its fourth month (124 days) without a budget, and there is no end in sight. Why?
FEDERAL SHUTDOWNS
When the federal government shuts down, it actually shuts down. Apart from essential services — such as law enforcement — government services stop. This angers the citizenry. Politicians, worried about the next election, find a way to get past their differences and pass a budget.
THE ILLINOIS “SHUTDOWN” THAT WASN’T
While Illinois does not have a budget, Illinois government is not completely shut down. According to the comptroller, Illinois continues to pay approximately 90% of its bills. As a result, only pockets of the citizenry are angered at any one moment. Things are kept at a simmer, rather than boiling over.
Drury ended up voting against the municipal, 911, lottery, etc. funding bill because it would take away a major pressure point.
* The synopsis for Rep. La Shawn Ford’s House Joint Resolution Constitutional Amendment 43…
Proposes to amend the Finance Article of the Illinois Constitution. Provides that if appropriation Acts are not in effect on July 1 of a fiscal year that provide for the expenditure of funds, the Comptroller shall order payments and the Treasurer shall make disbursements at the levels provided for in the previous fiscal year’s budget, to the extent revenues are available to make those disbursements. Provides that this provision does not apply to amounts appropriated on a continuing basis. Effective upon being declared adopted.
* The Question: Do you support or oppose HJRCA 43? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
online survey
54 Comments
|
Today’s number: 2.96 percent
Thursday, Nov 19, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Tribune…
Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s speed camera program improperly issued more than $2.4 million in fines to Chicago drivers, ticketing them when cameras were supposed to be off and when the required warning signs were confusing, obscured or missing, a Tribune investigation has found.
At the same time, City Hall has systematically ticketed drivers near schools without the legally required evidence of a schoolchild in sight. A Tribune random-sample analysis puts the number of those questionable tickets at about 110,000.
Here’s how they get that 110,000 number…
A ticket-by-ticket review of 1,500 randomly chosen citations from school zones found no children were present in the photographic evidence for nearly a third of the cases, even though a child’s presence was required. That review suggests that about 110,000 tickets may have been issued without legal justification.
OK, maybe. But let’s say that’s correct.
* Now, scroll almost all the way to the end of the story…
The speed camera program has doled out more than 2.1 million tickets, most of them warnings, along with more than $81 million in fines.
110,000 supposedly bad tickets out of 2.1 million total citations is a 5.2 percent error rate. And $2.4 million in supposedly bad fines out of $81 million in total fines is 2.96 percent.
33 Comments
|
Killing a bill ain’t passing one
Thursday, Nov 19, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Truer words were never written…
Passing a bill is a whole lot more difficult than killing one. The governor proved last week that he could kill a bill backed by Speaker Madigan. He has yet to show how he and Rep. Dunkin can pass a bill over Madigan’s objections. Why? Because they can’t.
* So, keep that in mind when you click the link to read this one…
Whew.
Care to do a caption contest?
90 Comments
|
In a word: No
Thursday, Nov 19, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From the Illinois Policy Institute’s news service…
Budget deal with reforms coming together?
Might a draft proposal by several rank-and-file lawmakers be the beginning of the end of the budget stalemate in Springfield? Several media outlets report a bipartisan group of lawmakers is working behind the scenes on a package of compromises that address reforms, spending and revenue.
Politico Illinois reports the compromise includes proposals for taxing retirement income over $50,000, allowing all school districts to bargain for 3rd party contracting, layoffs, class size, and more, and substantial workers compensation reforms along with property tax freezes.
Meanwhile Crain’s Chicago Business reports a political consultant released proposals including suggested spending and budget reforms, business and regulatory reforms, revenue, local control and pension reform, among others. Illinois is now more than four and a half months into the current fiscal year and there’s still no budget.
1) Those lawmakers haven’t met in over a month, so they’re not currently “working behind the scenes” on anything.
2) Their “compromise” was rejected by the governor, despite its “substantial workers compensation reforms.” It was too much revenue for not enough reforms, which is not a great sign since the Democrats moved pretty far off the dime. I’m not sure how much further they could go. I mean, as is, I seriously doubt they can sell this thing to their fellow Dem legislators, particularly in the House.
3) That political consultant also runs IllinoisGO, which was formed to guard Gov. Rauner’s Democratic/left flank. While his plan wasn’t completely horrible, he is persona non grata with the Democratic leadership and with most rank and file Democratic members. If you want to trace the origins of this stalemate, look to the spring, when IllinoisGO launched.
* I’ve been hearing that Ty Fahner’s Civic Committee of the Commercial Club of Chicago has been working on a little something something for months.
If that group comes out with a do-able compromise plan, then it may be time to pay attention because, as we saw with the pension reform fight, it has some powerful backers. His membership is chock full of Raunerites, so a plan would probably nudge the governor to the table. And many of those wealthy folks are also quite influential with the House Speaker.
As much as some might hate me saying it, Fahner could wind up being the key here if he manages to retain some independence when (if) he unveils his proposal.
33 Comments
|
NCSL publishes “refugee primer”
Thursday, Nov 19, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Your mandatory reading assignment today is “The US Refugee Resettlement Program: A Primer for Policymakers” published by the National Conference of State Legislatures. Click here and discuss below.
35 Comments
|
* From Americans for Prosperity Illinois on Tuesday…
Today the non-partisan Tax Foundation released its 2016 State Business Tax Climate Index and Illinois has jumped 8 spots, from 31st to 23rd largely due to the end of corporate and individual income tax increases first imposed back in 2011. The rate reduction is the major reason for this 8 spot jump, showing how Illinois improve its efforts to attract jobs. Americans for Prosperity Illinois fought to preserve the expiration of the tax hikes in 2014 and will continue to advocate for a better climate for competition, including a lower tax burden.
“Illinois’ leaders should take note of this report,” said AFP Illinois State Director David From. “Our state is now in a better position to compete for jobs because we have a better business environment than in years past. However, this report also shows that the massive tax hikes being advocated by many in Springfield will have the effect of making the Land of Lincoln a worse climate for job growth. AFP Illinois will continue to educate citizens on the importance of limited government and lower taxes in order to make Illinois the economic engine of the Midwest.”
Americans for Prosperity Illinois is the state’s foremost group of grassroots activists advocating for limited government and economic freedom.
* The Wall St. Journal chimed in with its usual cluelessness…
The College Football Playoff rankings are intensely contested by teams and their fans. This week the Tax Foundation released its tax policy equivalent, which ought to be a major embarrassment for the blue state conference. […]
The trophy for most-improved this year goes to Illinois, which jumped to 23rd from 31st—no thanks to Democrats in Springfield. The Tax Foundation notes that the leap occurred “due to the sunset of corporate and individual income tax increases” that Democrats “first imposed in 2011 as temporary levies to address the state’s backlog of unpaid bills.” First-year Republican Governor Bruce Rauner has let the income-tax rate lapse to 3.75% from 5% and the corporate rate to 7.75% from 9.5%, though Democrats are trying to push them back up.
Keeping taxes low is critical to turning around the Prairie State, which trails its neighbors in economic growth. Would that liberal state politicians cared as much about their tax ranking as colleges do about their football standings.
Actually, it was the Democrats who let the tax hike sunset after Rauner demanded it.
And Rauner has been saying for months that he’s willing to raise the tax rate to 4.75 percent - a tiny bit below where we were a year ago.
Also too, where is the business boom and rising state revenues from the lowered tax rates here?
* The reality is, unlike the NCAA rankings, the myriad tax rankings out there have little to no value. We were just below the middle of the pack before the tax expiration, and yet we were losing population and jobs. We’re just above it now and yet the BLS numbers aren’t great. The October BLS state-level numbers haven’t been published yet, but BLS showed a strong national surge last month. Let’s see how Illinois does in those rankings.
*** UPDATE *** October’s report is pretty decent news for a change. We have 4 percent of the nation’s population, but got 5 percent of last month’s 271,000 new jobs…
The Illinois Department of Employment Security (IDES) announced today that Illinois’ nonfarm payroll employment gained +14,100 jobs and the unemployment rate in October held at 5.4 percent, based on preliminary data released by the Department and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). October’s gain follows four consecutive monthly declines. Illinois’ average job growth since the employment recovery began in January 2010 remains below the national average, however, and employment will not recover from the 2007-2009 recession until December 2016, according to IDES analysts. The nation is currently 3.1 percent above its prior peak level of employment.
“For 2015, job growth this month was the strongest since February and it is positive that we reversed the four-month decline preceding these numbers. Our job growth rate, however, continues to lag behind the nation,” said IDES Director Jeff Mays. “While the unemployment rate remained unchanged in October, our workforce participation rate edged up slightly as more people entered the labor force and more people found jobs during the month.”
50 Comments
|
Jimenez likely Poe successor
Thursday, Nov 19, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I told subscribers about this days ago, but here’s Politico’s take…
A SURE DEAL? — Republican sources say they’re certain Illinois first lady Diana Rauner’s chief of staff, Sara Jimenez, will get Gov. Bruce Rauner’s backing to replace Republican state Rep. Raymond Poe. Rauner just picked Poe to head the state agriculture department.
– While Rauner has authority to appoint someone to finish Poe’s term, the seat will be up for reelection next year. “It will be an epic battle,” said one Republican source. That’s because it’s in a heavily Republican district, but also a heavy union district. It’s expected labor will spend what is must to block a Rauner-appointee from taking the seat, given the governor’s year-long blasting of unions.
Sara is the likely appointee, but, of course, it’s the county party chairmen who appoint legislators, not the governor. And in this case, Sangamon is the only county in Poe’s 99th District. So, it’s up to Rosemarie Long, who appears to be pretty close to the governor. It’s her appointment, but the widespread belief is that she’ll do Rauner’s bidding.
And I don’t know what organized labor can spend to block the appointment because it’s not a campaign. I would expect the unions to put up a fight, but can they get a Republican on the primary ballot by the November 30th deadline? I haven’t heard any names as of yet, but I’ll check around. Unions will likely do battle in the fall, but that district is pretty darned GOP.
* Jimenez does have some detractors out there…
One of the contenders to be named to replace former GOP state Rep. RAYMOND POE in the 99th District doesn’t have a solid Republican voting record.
SARA WOJCICKI JIMENEZ voted in Democratic primaries in 2002 and 2008 and didn’t vote in partisan primaries in 2004 and 2006, records show. She voted in Republican primaries in 2010, 2012 and 2014 as well as this year in the special primary in the 18th Congressional District.
Wojcicki in 2008 went from a job as Statehouse reporter for WICS-TV Channel 20 to become a spokeswoman for then-Democratic state Treasurer ALEXI GIANNOULIAS. About a year later, in the spring of 2009, she became spokeswoman for then-House Republican Leader TOM CROSS of Oswego. In 2013, she went to work for then-Comptroller JUDY BAAR TOPINKA as director of intergovernmental affairs and program communications, and earlier this year, she took the $100,000-a-year job as chief of staff to first lady DIANA RAUNER — her current job.
Sangamon County election records don’t show any Democratic primary votes among three other people vying for Poe’s seat: KENT GRAY, BRYCE BENTON or GRAY NOLL. Noll has been identified by Rosemarie Long, who chairs the Sangamon County GOP, as Poe’s preferred candidate.
What some hardcore partisans often fail to comprehend is that people do change their party affiliations. And that’s a good thing for the parties who get those new people. It’s called growth.
Either way, I seriously doubt that this will hurt Sara’s chances at the appointment.
68 Comments
|
* Remember yesterday’s “Weirdest story of the day” post about how Illinois Racing Board Commissioner Kathy Byrne resigned after Arlington chairman Dick Duchossois killed off her proposal to prevent racehorse slaughters?
Well, Ms. Byrne sent this late yesterday afternoon…
Hi Rich-
It’s not really such a weird story. Since August I have been trying to get an amendment to the [Illinois Racing Board] rules to provide some protection and monitoring of racehorses so they are not shipped to Mexico or Canada for inhumane slaughter. According to the USDA, 80,000 horses are shipped off this way–alive– each year. They don’t monitor by breed, but it’s estimated that about 10% of these are racehorses.It’s a horrible death for the horses, but it’s also a black eye for the racing industry.
I worked very hard with all the tracks, the horsemen’s associations and the breeders to come up with language that was agreeable and served the purpose. Arlington Park has strong anti-slaughter policies, and was very helpful in proposing language for the amendment and I used that language.
For whatever reason, and I honestly don’t know why, the chairman and the general counsel of the IRB seemed determined not to let this amendment come up for a vote. The obstructions are too complicated to get into here, but after four months of pushing and groveling I finally got it on the agenda yesterday.
So, I was surprised and shocked when Arlington Park very publicly pulled its support, objecting to language that it had asked to have incorporated into the amendment. The specific sentence is one that requires owners and trainers to fill out an exit/destination slip when they take a horse from the track, and for the track to notify the IRB if they refuse. Arlington’s objection was seized upon by the chairman and counsel, who began arguing that there was no need for the rule at all. Rather than have the Board vote against protecting racehorses from slaughter, I withdrew it.
It has been a deteriorating and increasingly hostile situation for me since March when the new chairman was appointed. As of yesterday, I had six months left in my term and it was obvious to me that if the controlling forces on the Board were fighting me on something as benign as this amendment, anything else I might offer in the next six months would also be DOA. So rather than spending six months doing nothing, I resigned.
I hope this helps explain what happened yesterday. I’m sad to go, but it’s better this way.
Kathy Byrne
Discuss.
47 Comments
|
* Mark Kirk campaign oppo…
Duckworth Says She Has Confidence In America’s Vetting Process
Duckworth Said She Has Confidence Our Security Can Properly Vet Syrian Refugees Entering The United States. But U.S. Rep. Tammy Duckworth, D-Schaumburg, said at a separate event that the country needs to “have confidence in our intelligence services” and not put up walls. “Our nation is better than that,” Duckworth said, underlining her support for a measure to allow up to 200,000 refugees from the war-plagued country in the U.S. (Greg Hinz, “Stark political split opens up on Syrian refugees,” Crain’s Chicago Business, 11/16/15)
In A Press Conference Tammy Duckworth Said She Was “Confident” US Can Filter Terrorists. “.@RepDuckworth “confident” US intelligence can filter terrorists from Syrian refugees.” (Charles Thomas Twitter Feed, 11/16/15)
But In 2014 She Said She Did Not Trust The Vetting Process
VIDEO: In 2014, Duckworth Said She Was Not Comfortable With The Vetting Process When It Comes To Syrian Rebels. DUCKWORTH: “I can’t trust the Syrian rebels, Kate. We don’t know who they are. I’m not comfortable with the vetting process, and I don’t know how long this commitment is.” (CNN, 9/17/14)
* Initial Duckworth campaign response…
More of the same fear-mongering from Mark Kirk. Incredibly dishonest and disingenuous.
She’s explicitly referring to the plan to arm Syrian rebels - in Syria - a program, by the way, she was right about and has since been suspended.
We’re talking now about refugees who are attempting to flee the awful effects of the Syrian civil war. This isn’t even apples to oranges, it’s apples to bowling balls, and they should be ashamed for trying to blur the difference on a crucial matter of national security.
* And then came the roundhouse from Team Duckworth…
It is an apples to oranges comparison. They are completely different processes. The refugee process is 18-24 months while they were handing out weapons to Syria rebels like candy.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/09/politics/us-syria-rebels-arms-program-suspended/
The flip of this is Kirk supports the vetting process of giving guns to Syria rebels but not the vetting of orphans and widows. This vote was less 18 months ago
Kirk Voted To Train And Equip “Appropriately Vetted” Syrian Forces To Fight ISIS. “Durbin was explaining why he would be voting for a measure, to run through Dec. 11, to train and equip ‘appropriately vetted’ Syrian forces to battle the Islamic State group - also called ISIS or ISIL - and temporarily fund the federal government. A day after the House approved similar legislation, the Senate concurred 73-22 on a bipartisan roll call, with Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., also voting yes. […] Earlier in the day, after Durbin said he would vote for the measure - which did not specifically authorize a war against ISIL - I asked him about his decision. […] Kirk told me he also wants an authorization vote. And if the Obama White House called him, Kirk said, ‘I could offer some very good guidance to build bipartisan support for the military mission in Iraq.’” [Chicago Sun-Times, 9/19/14]
I’ll let you know if the Kirk campaign responds.
*** UPDATE *** The Kirk response is good…
The simple truth is that Rep. Duckworth has expressed confidence in a vetting process that is not shared by either the Director of the FBI, the Director of National Intelligence nor the Director of the National Counter Terrorism Center. Moreover, Rep. Duckworth seeks to let in 200,000 refugees over the next 13 months–that’s twenty times more than the administration is requesting–utilizing a vetting system that has failed before.
ABC News Headline: Terrorists Once Used Refugee Program to Settle in US. (James Gordon Meek And Brian Ross, “Terrorists Once Used Refugee Program To Settle In US,” ABC News, 11/18/15)
Two Men Who Had Used A Refugee Program Turned Out To Be Al-Qaeda Linked Terrorists. Of the 31 states that have declared their opposition to taking in Syrian refugees, one state, Kentucky, has a specific reason to be wary of the background check process: previously two Iraqi refugees who settled in Bowling Green turned out to be al Qaeda-linked terrorists with the blood of American soldiers on their hands, an ABC News investigation found. Both pleaded guilty to terror-connected charges after trying to acquire heavy weapons while in America’s heartland. (James Gordon Meek And Brian Ross, “Terrorists Once Used Refugee Program To Settle In US,” ABC News, 11/18/15)
Other Suspected Terrorists Had Been Let Into The Country Posing As War Refugees From Afghanistan. The 2013 ABC News investigation also revealed that several dozen other suspected terrorist bombmakers, including some who were believed to have targeted U.S. troops, may have mistakenly been allowed to move to the U.S. as Iraq and Afghanistan War refugees, among the tens of thousands of innocent immigrants. (James Gordon Meek And Brian Ross, “Terrorists Once Used Refugee Program To Settle In US,” ABC News, 11/18/15)
19 Comments
|
*** UPDATED x1 *** Question of the day
Wednesday, Nov 18, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* AP…
Illinois groups that help Syrian refugees resettle are calling on Gov. Bruce Rauner to reverse his decision to temporarily stop accepting new Syrian refugees after the attacks in Paris.
Members of groups including RefugeeOne and the Heartland Alliance said Wednesday they believe Rauner doesn’t have the authority to halt the federal resettlement program, but they want a welcoming atmosphere in Illinois. They say Rauner and other GOP governors’ similar decisions were made out of fear. They say refugee screening processes are vigorous.
Since 2010 Illinois has received 169 Syrian refugees.
RefugeeOne executive director Melineh Kano says at least 21 more individuals are expected in December. She says Rauner’s administration has requested information on them.
Congresswoman Tammy Duckworth has also weighed in with a Tribune op-ed.
*** UPDATE *** A new statement from the governor…
“The Governor has been very clear — we need to preserve our heritage as a state welcoming of refugees while addressing the all-too-real security concerns that continue to evolve every day,” the statement reads. “A State Department official confirmed to our staff this morning that ISIS has demonstrated an interest in infiltrating refugee populations heading to the West. The official also confirmed that in recent years, some refugees admitted to the United States were later discovered to have terrorist ties.
“At the same time, we continue to request briefings from the federal government on refugees being resettled to Illinois before they come — and the federal government has no official information sharing mechanism to coordinate directly with Governors on such individuals. As California’s governor reportedly said to the White House chief of staff last night, the federal government must evolve with the threat and modernize their information sharing with state governments. This is a reasonable and responsible step to take to ensure we maintain a balance between compassion for refugees and security for our citizens.”
* The Question: Should the governor reverse his decision? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
survey service
126 Comments
|
No need to read more than this
Wednesday, Nov 18, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Mark Brown…
The city of Chicago’s last chance for finding a semi-soft landing to its pension crisis appeared to fade away Tuesday as the Illinois Supreme Court looked askance at Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s plan to save two of its troubled pension funds.
Just as they were when state officials argued they had found the magic legislative end run to the Illinois Constitution’s strict pension protection clause for public employees, the justices were tough in their questioning of City Corporation Counsel Stephen Patton, signaling that they’re no more impressed by the city’s effort to thread the needle.
Tough questions aren’t always an indication of how a court will rule, but when coupled with the court’s earlier ruling overturning the state’s pension reform efforts, this would seem a good time for everyone to buckle up in anticipation of when they do.
Every other story is pretty much the same.
50 Comments
|
* From a press release…
Governor Bruce Rauner and the following labor unions have agreed to terms on new four-year collective bargaining agreements: Service Employees International Union (“SEIU”), Local 1 Chicago, the International Union of United Food and Commercial Workers, the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Three Councils of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America (The Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters, Mid-Central Illinois Regional Council of Carpenters, and the St. Louis-Kansas City Carpenter’s Regional Council), the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers – Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers, and Helpers, the Laborers International Union of North America, the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, & Transportation Workers, and Illinois State Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers.
In October, the Administration announced agreements with the International Union of Operating Engineers, the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry, and the International Association of Machinist and Aerospace Workers. These agreements have now been ratified. Over the summer, the Administration reached collective bargaining agreements with 5 different bargaining units represented by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, all of which have also been ratified.
Altogether, the Governor has now successfully negotiated new collective bargaining agreements with 17 different bargaining units representing more than 5,000 state employees. These developments stand in stark contrast to the ongoing negotiations with AFSCME Council 31. Despite being offered substantially the same material terms as the Teamsters and the Trades, AFSCME has to date rejected the Governor’s chief proposals.
The agreements announced today include:
· The State will expand the existing group health insurance program by offering employees a variety of new options. In the expanded program, employees will receive on average $967 per month to either maintain their current premiums, maintain their current coverage, mix and match in the way that is most beneficial to them, or shop for an entirely new custom health insurance package potentially on a new health insurance marketplace. Employees can also use the State’s contribution to purchase insurance through a union plan.
· A new performance incentive program to reward employees with bonuses for cost-saving measures and meeting or exceeding performance standards.
· A new, collaborative managed competition program that allows management and the unions to work together to provide low-cost alternatives to outsourcing.
· A reduction in the payout for accumulated unused vacation from 75 to 45 days for employees hired after January 1, 2016.
· Continuation of a 40-hour work week with overtime earned after 40 hours.
· A program to enable the State of Illinois to address minority underutilization in state government.
· Increased training and certification opportunities for employees.
· Continuation of the prevailing rate system administered by the Illinois Department of Labor.
AFSCME is now on the opposite side of these negotiations from their own colleagues in organized labor. AFSCME continues to reject many of the same, reasonable proposals being ratified by wide margins by their fellow state employees:
· AFSCME continues to reject the health insurance framework accepted by the trade unions. AFSCME’s proposal is to continue the same unaffordable health insurance system that the credit rating agencies have noted in the recent downgrades.
· AFSCME continues to reject a new performance incentive program accepted by trades and Teamsters. AFSCME’s proposal is to continue to pay employees unaffordable automatic wage increases.
· AFSCME continues to reject a new, collaborative managed competition program accepted by trades and Teamsters.
· AFSCME continues to resist moving the overtime trigger to the common workplace benchmark of 40 hours.
· AFSCME continues to reject a program to enable the State of Illinois to address minority underutilization in state government.
· AFSCME continues to reject a four-year wage freeze. Teamsters, in contrast, not only agreed to freeze their wages but did so on top of the 75% in-hire rate.
*** UPDATE 1 *** From AFSCME Council 31…
Contrary to statements from the Governor’s Office today, the Rauner Administration has failed to reach agreement on union contracts covering the vast majority of state employees. In addition to AFSCME, unions that have not reached agreements include the INA, LIUNA, IFT, FOP, PB&PA and SEIU Healthcare, which together represent more than 40,000 state employees and tens of thousands of state-funded independent providers.
In contrast, the trades unions whose agreements were announced today represent only several hundred state workers.
The issues at stake in the trades negotiations are likewise very different. Because these unions have independent health plans, their members have the option not to take state health insurance. Similarly, their pay is typically set by the prevailing wage. Our union negotiates the health plan covering state and university employees and retirees, and bargains wage schedules for more than 500 job titles.
In negotiations with AFSCME, the Rauner Administration is demanding a four-year wage freeze and huge hikes in employee health costs, forcing workers to pay double their current premium to keep their coverage and driving down their take-home pay.
The Rauner Administration is also seeking to eliminate our contract’s safeguards against reckless privatization of public services, and demanding a so-called “merit pay” scheme that opens the door wide to cronyism by letting politically appointed bosses determine who gets a raise.
Like all working people, caregivers, child protection workers, correctional officers and other AFSCME-represented public service workers in state government deserve wages that sustain a family, affordable health care, retirement security and a voice on the job.
Our union is committed to reaching a fair agreement that achieves those goals. If the governor shares our commitment, he will correct his staff’s misleading claims and alter his confrontational tactics that make it harder, not easier, to find common ground.
*** UPDATE 2 *** Press release…
Following is the statement of SEIU Healthcare Illinois President Keith Kelleher in response to the breaking news that the Bruce Rauner administration had reached a contract deal with a unit of SEIU Local 1:
“While we are happy for our sisters and brothers at SEIU Local 1, the fact remains that the state’s largest bargaining units, the 52,000 low-income Illinois home healthcare and child care workers of SEIU Healthcare Illinois, continue to work without a contract while Bruce Rauner presses extreme demands that would totally destabilize this workforce.
“Our contracts expired June 30th. At the bargaining table, Gov. Rauner has sought to strip the lowest-paid workforce in the state of health insurance and training, along with other demands meant to diminish if not outright eliminate the workplace voice of these vital workers. He also is demanding a wage freeze for workers earning poverty-level wages. Already, he has stopped payments to the healthcare funds for our workers, raising immediate threats of misery and economic hardship on a large scale.
“For some reason, Rauner appears to be willing to single out SEIU Healthcare for demands harsher than the other units of government with whom he has reached a deal and ALL OF WHICH were able to keep their bargained-for health insurance—and their union voice.
“Rauner recently attacked our workforce through administrative rules meant to diminish the size of the home healthcare and child care workforces. And he bankrolls anti-union groups that are shamefully attacking our workers in the courts and in the media. His ongoing attacks at the bargaining table are part of his greater hostility against collective bargaining in general and his billionaire agenda to permanently weaken the union movement.”
64 Comments
|
Weirdest story of the day
Wednesday, Nov 18, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From the Daily Racing Form…
A move to create new rules to prevent racehorses in Illinois from being sold for slaughter was voted down and tabled until at least next month during a meeting of the Illinois Racing Board on Tuesday, prompting Kathy Byrne, the commissioner who has pushed for enhanced anti-slaughter regulation and submitted the item on the Tuesday agenda, to withdraw the proposal and hastily leave the meeting, saying she was resigning her post. […]
Enhanced anti-slaughter rules were first brought up by Byrne during an IRB meeting in August. Byrne attempted to bring forth the measure during the IRB’s September meeting to award racing dates, but Brincat insisted it be put off until October, and when that meeting was canceled, Byrne’s measure to initiate rulemaking was rescheduled for Tuesday.
The amended official language under consideration would have required racetracks to monitor horses leaving their grounds to attempt to ensure that they were not on the way, directly or indirectly, to slaughterhouses. Trainers or owners would be required to sign forms attesting to a departing horse’s destination.
Both Chicago-area horsemen’s groups, the Illinois Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association and the Illinois Harness Horsemen’s Association, supported Byrne’s measure, which seemed to be on the way to passage Tuesday when Arlington chairman Dick Duchossois rose to speak against it, expressing concern about racetracks’ legal liability. Duchossois said Arlington needed more time to review the proposal, but Byrne said the specific language called into question had come straight from Arlington during negotiations over the measure.
And that’s when she quit and walked out.
Mr. D isn’t to be trifled with, apparently.
Byrne, by the way, is the daughter of the late Mayor Jane Byrne.
35 Comments
|
* Press release…
ICPR to Governor, Leaders: Skip Hour Long Opening Remarks, Proceed Directly to Budget Talks at Dec. 1st Meeting
Last week, ICPR and other leading Illinois reform organizations called on Governor Rauner to propose a bipartisan agenda for the upcoming budget meeting with the legislative leaders, now scheduled for December 1st. On Friday, Governor Rauner circulated a letter outlining a tentative agenda for the meeting, which allots the first hour for individual statements by each meeting participant. ICPR and other signing reform groups believe that proceeding directly to open budget discussions between the Governor and leaders would ensure a more productive meeting.
The groups recommend focusing on recently released bipartisan budget proposals as a starting point for budget talks. ICPR Board Chair Hon. Susan Garrett believes that “these proposals could serve as an important framework and jump-start the budget negotiation process.” Copies of ICPR’s letter were distributed to the Governor and legislative leaders’ offices on Wednesday. Click here for a copy of Governor Rauner’s letter. Click here for a copy of ICPR’s letter.
ICPR, the League of Women Voters of Illinois, Business and Professional People for the Public Interest, the Citizen Advocacy Center, Illinois PIRG, and CHANGE Illinois were signers on the letter.
The Better Government Association did not sign the letter, which could be an interesting development. But if the BGA comes out against this idea, they’ll surely be reminded of the governor’s very large contributions to the group.
* The letter, with emphasis in the original…
November 18, 2015
Hon. Bruce Rauner, Governor State of Illinois
James R. Thompson Center 100 W. Randolph, 16-100 Chicago, IL 60601
Dear Governor Rauner:
Thank you for circulating your November 13th letter regarding the upcoming budget meeting, now scheduled for December 1st. We continue to be hopeful that this meeting will lead to a meaningful budget framework accepted by all parties – one that will provide a springboard to finding a solution to the ongoing impasse.
Illinois needs and deserves an immediate budget resolution for many reasons, most importantly to provide fiscal certainty to millions of individuals, families, businesses, municipalities, and organizations that provide much needed services. Without a budget resolution, Illinois will lose even more credibility nationwide. We cannot afford another week or month without a clear solution in sight.
We write today to respectfully express our reservations with your plan to devote the first hour of the meeting to individual commentaries from the leaders and yourself “on the issues about which they feel most passionately.”
Instead, given the urgency of the situation, we encourage you to dispense with the hour of individual statements and proceed directly to a public and open discussion of the various comprehensive bipartisan budget proposals that have been recently released. We believe this approach will enable all participants to collectively discuss their priorities on critical budget issues and lead to a more productive meeting.
We believe this discussion has the potential to generate a path to resolving the ongoing budget stalemate. Like many across the state, our expectations and hopes are high.
…Adding… It is worth pointing out, however, that all legislative leaders except Speaker Madigan have publicly agreed to the governor’s format.
I wouldn’t expect this to have much impact, unless MJM uses it somehow.
70 Comments
|
Focus on this now
Wednesday, Nov 18, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Sun-Times editorial…
As reported in the Sun-Times on Sunday, the State Police have largely ignored a state law that they track what happens to guns owned by thousands of people whose gun ownership rights have been revoked for mental health reasons. The state police started doing so only in recent weeks — and only after Sun-Times reporters Frank Main and Mick Dumke began asking questions.
Many local police departments also have paid no attention to the law, often unaware that it even exists.
At every level, then, law enforcement agencies in Illinois largely have failed to perform a basic and legally required task — check whether people whose gun ownership rights have been revoked for good reason are, in fact, complying with the law.
After the mass shooting at Virginia Tech University in 2007, Illinois required health professionals to notify the state of any patient showing “violent, suicidal, threatening or assaultive behavior.” Then, as part of a 2013 law allowing concealed carry in Illinois, State Police were required to send notification letters to Firearm Owner’s Identification Card holders when their cards are revoked. The cardholders have 48 hours to turn in the cards, transfer the firearms to the police or a valid FOID holder, or file a report with police saying how many guns they have, where they are and whether they plan to transfer ownership.
If they don’t follow the rules, police can get a warrant and search their homes.
The idea behind the law makes sense. The vast majority of people struggling with issues of mental health are not violent, obviously. And people who have been diagnosed with mental health issues are, almost by definition, seeking help. But it is a matter of common sense that people who have been judged a legitimate threat to themselves or others shouldn’t own guns.
Last year, the State Police revoked 1,415 cards because of mental health issues and denied 1,791 new applications. What they did not do is check to see if the people whose cards were revoked actually got rid of their guns. They don’t know if people whose cards have been revoked are complying with what the letters say they have to do.
* And along those same lines, here’s Wordslinger in comments today…
Since Sandy Hook, there have been more than 1,000 documented mass shootings in the United States.
Guess how many involved Syrian refugees?
Meanwhile, it was reported here the other day that 50,000 Illinoisans have been refused issuance or had their FOID cards revoked, under state law, due to mental illness.
Yet the ISP has no clue as to how many of those folks currently possess guns, illegally. and no authorities are employing the tools of the state law to find out.
That would appear to be a public safety issue.
Who in the administration is carrying the ball to ensure that state law is being executed faithfully, when it comes to guns and the mentally ill?
What’s gonna happen if, God forbid, we have a school shooting here and it turns out that the cops didn’t follow state law?
Get on it, folks. Now.
44 Comments
|
That’s optimism?
Wednesday, Nov 18, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Oy…
[Rep. Charlie Meier (R-Okawville)] said he does not expect there will be a budget passed by the end of the current calendar year.
“But I’m more optimistic, and expect that the budget will be approved in February or March,” he said.
Just for context here, the governor’s next budget address has been scheduled for February 17th.
19 Comments
|
* From US Sen. Mark Kirk…
Keeping Americans Safe from ISIS
Dear Friend,
This week, I urged President Obama to ensure no refugee related to the Syrian crisis is admitted to our country unless the U.S. government can guarantee, with 100 percent assurance, that they are not affiliated with ISIS.
Um, the government can’t guarantee anything with 100 percent certainty. No human entity can do that. Ever. Human beings are not perfect. Sen. Kirk ought to know that.
I asked Kirk’s office for an explanation. Here it is…
“Currently, the FBI, the Director of National Intelligence and the Director of the National Counter Terrorism Center all have grave concerns about our national ability to filter and vet Syrian refugees to prevent ISIS infiltration into the United States. In the Senate, Senator Kirk is introducing legislation to pause the refugee program until a time when our law enforcement and defense entities reach a level of certitude that they can in fact prevent ISIS infiltration via refugees without unnecessary risk to Americans.”
A “level of certitude” to protect against “unnecessary risk” is a whole lot different than “100 percent assurance” that nobody has ISIS ties.
* There are some legit concerns, however…
In a call with senior Obama administration officials Tuesday evening, several governors demanded they be given access to information about Syrian refugees about to be resettled by the federal government in their states. Top White House officials refused.
Over a dozen governors from both parties joined the conference call, which was initiated by the White House after 27 governors vowed not to cooperate with further resettlement of Syrian refugees in their states. The outrage among governors came after European officials revealed that one of the Paris attackers may have entered Europe in October through the refugee process using a fake Syrian passport. (The details of the attacker’s travels are still murky.) […]
“There was a real sense of frustration from all the governors that there is just a complete lack of transparency and communication coming from the federal government,” said one GOP state official who was on the call.
The administration officials, led by McDonough, assured the governors that the vetting process was thorough and that the risks of admitting Syrian refugees could be properly managed. He added that the federal government saw no reason to alter the current method of processing refugees.
Gov. Rauner did not participate in the call. I’m told that they had “a senior administration official and subject matter expert on the call.” One of those folks was Rauner’s chief legislative liaison Richard Goldberg, who has significant foreign policy experience and came from Mark Kirk’s office.
* Crain’s…
We expected better of Bruce Rauner. When Illinois hired him to be its 42nd governor, we counted on him to do what he said he would do: to take on the state’s biggest problem—namely, the pension-fueled deficit crisis—and to do it as the more-or-less compassionate conservative that he styled himself to be on the campaign trail.
What a difference a year makes.
The governor this week joined the chorus of Republican governors who, in the wake of the Paris terrorist attacks, declared they would accept no further refugees from Syria. This from the governor of a state whose Syrian refugee population so far numbers in the hundreds.
There is no rational basis for Rauner’s action. The terrorists responsible for the Paris atrocities were not Syrian refugees—they were European nationals. And while the governor argues that Syrian refugees represent a security threat grave enough to merit even a temporary review of our immigration procedures, we are not hearing him object to waving in refugees from other war-torn regions. How are the thousands of refugees coming into the U.S. from Afghanistan and Iraq any different from Syrians?
As the Economist recently pointed out, if a potential terrorist is determined to enter America to do harm, there are easier and faster ways to do it than via this nation’s complex refugee resettlement process. Refugees, in fact, are among the most heavily vetted of any U.S. immigrants, undergoing at least 18 months of background checks before being allowed to move freely on U.S. soil. […]
What’s shameful is the governor very likely already knows banning additional Syrian refugees from the Land of Lincoln is ridiculous. Why do we think so? Because we know he’s a smart and fairly reasonable person. Yet he made this declaration anyway—despite evidence that he doesn’t have the legal authority to do so.
* Um, OK, did the Crain’s editorial board forget about this?…
With Election Day fast approaching, Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn is seeking to inoculate himself against criticism he hasn’t done enough to jump start Illinois’ economy, while Republican challenger Bruce Rauner is trying to make the final week of the campaign about the Ebola virus. […]
Rauner said his support for an Ebola travel ban was based in part on conversations with Republican U.S. Sen. Mark Kirk’s staff.
Gov. Quinn had no legal authority to institute a travel ban and everybody, including Crain’s (which endorsed Rauner), knew it. This is not some new Bruce Rauner.
* Lynn Sweet…
A Syrian family fleeing war starts a new life in Chicago on Wednesday, despite Gov. Bruce Rauner’s temporary ban on accepting Syrian refugees in the wake of the Paris attacks.
The Muslim family of five – parents and three children – will be assisted by volunteers organized by Exodus World Service, the non-profit headquartered in suburban Bloomingdale dedicated to mobilizing “the Christian community to welcome refugees.” […]
A spokesman for the Jewish Federation of Chicago, the agency that administers the Illinois Refugee Social Services Consortium, a network of nine non-profits who contract with the federal government to provide services, said Tuesday nothing has changed.
What will Rauner do about those three kids? He can’t expel them. Will he deny them federal benefits that the state controls?
* Meanwhile…
In Germany, Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere told reporters in Berlin that a Syrian passport found with one of the Paris attackers with the name Ahmad al Mohammad may have been a false flag intended to make Europeans fearful of refugees. The passport showed registrations in Greece, Serbia and Croatia, which he described as “unusual.”
He said the multiple registrations by a person using the passport were “evidence that this was a trail that was intentionally laid, but it can’t be ruled out at the moment that this was an IS terrorist who came to France … via Germany as a refugee.”
* Related…
* Overall hate crimes down, except against Muslims: FBI
* Steinberg: Give Rauner a break
* Tribune editorial: The case for a refugee pause: Cooler heads, and this includes House Speaker Paul Ryan and Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner, have called for a “pause” in the acceptance of Syrian refugees. The Obama administration should take heed.
* Sneed exclusive: Burke plans to reaffirm Chicago as sanctuary
* Tom Kacich: State — and C-U — once welcomed refugees
39 Comments
|
An idea whose time has come (maybe)
Wednesday, Nov 18, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* An interesting idea…
In the Massachusetts 2012 Senate race, Elizabeth Warren and Scott Brown proved that when candidates are serious about curbing the influence of super PACs on their race, they can work together to make it happen.
In an agreement known as the People’s Pledge, Warren and Brown made a mutual promise to reject the support of super PACs. They pledged that if a super PAC spent money to support either of their campaigns, whoever benefited from the expenditure would offset it by forfeiting money from their own campaign coffers. The idea was new, bold, and bilateral, and it changed the calculus of spending in the race.
Because super PACs saw that making expenditures to support Warren or Brown would ultimately hurt them, it no longer made sense for super PACs to spend money in the race. As a result, the People’s Pledge successfully eliminated virtually all super PAC spending, and it helped to cut the volume of negative advertising – which super PAC money almost exclusively buys – in half. In short, with the mere stroke of a pen, Warren and Brown gave the people of Massachusetts a substantially more accountable race.
* Press release…
New television advertisements airing this weekend in Illinois are targeting both frontrunners in the Illinois Senate race by challenging Mark Kirk (R) and Tammy Duckworth (D) to refuse the flood of unaccountable election spending by outside groups. The ads, which will air online during the week and on local CBS around the Chicago Bears game on Sunday, are part of a campaign run by CounterPAC, a group backed by tech entrepreneurs advocating for fair elections by curbing the influence of outside spending.
The new video ads follow print ads in October from CounterPAC in the Chicago Sun-Times and the State Journal-Register that encouraged the Illinois’ Senate candidates to “Take the Pledge” and mutually agree to reject expenditures by outside groups during the 2016 campaign. Recent reports indicate that spending from outside groups in the Illinois’ Senate race has already eclipsed $1.7 million, with more than $1 million favoring the Democratic side.
The ads highlight the candidates’ own criticism of the influence of outside spending and challenge them to do something about it by taking the CounterPAC pledge to reject outside money. The ad targeting Kirk plays on Kirk’s comments that an unknown group could run ads saying he strangles kittens – then offers a short glimpse of a Mark Kirk: Kitten Killer style ad. The ad targeting Duckworth highlights the inconsistency of Duckworth’s stated commitment to stemming the tide of money in politics as she rides a wave of outside spending in her own campaign for Senate.
“Both Mark Kirk and Tammy Duckworth have been outspoken about the trouble with elections that are dominated by super PACs – so this is a chance for each of them to put their money where their mouth is,” said CounterPAC Executive Director Jay Costa. “A simple pledge could erase outside money – giving voters a race free of unlimited outside spending and offering a model of accountability for other races across the country.”
CounterPAC is prepared to act as the arbiter and enforcer of a “no outside spending” pledge after candidates have mutually agreed to the terms, which include rejecting expenditures from outside sources and countering rejected expenditures by donating 50 percent of the cost of the rejected expenditure to a charity of the opposing candidate’s choice. In the 2012 Massachusetts Senate race, Elizabeth Warren and Scott Brown agreed to a similar pledge. That agreement set the precedent for the CounterPAC pledge and was widely regarded as successfully limiting outside spending.
A recent poll conducted by Bloomberg shows that 87% of Americans think the current campaign finance system should be reformed to curb the influence of wealthy donors, with 78% saying specifically that they disapprove of the unlimited corporate spending unleashed by the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision.
Your thoughts?
…Adding… From a good pal…
I worked on Brown’s campaign. It ended up being a bad deal for Brown, which is why he didn’t do it in 2014.
The problem was not so much with the outside spending that it did ban, as the outside spending it did not. Specifically, only TV, radio and print ads were banned. Outside groups could, and did, spend money on direct mail, robocalls and, most crucially, get out the vote drives.
Get out the vote drives are a traditional strength on the Democratic side, particularly unions, and a traditional weakness for Republicans. Outspending them on the air was the Republican counter. The People’s Pledge, combined with Warren’s extremely robust fundraising, made that impossible.
Point taken.
16 Comments
|
* Give the governor credit for his chutzpah. I mean, an anti-union governor endorses a replacement for a pro-union Republican in the center of AFSCME’s universe? Whew…
Rosemarie Long, who chairs Sangamon County Republicans, said Tuesday that she hopes her party can name a replacement in the Illinois House for state Rep. Raymond Poe by Friday.
And Gov. Bruce Rauner may become involved.
“The governor is watching the process closely and has not weighed in at this time, but plans to make an endorsement,” said Rauner spokeswoman Catherine Kelly.
Poe resigned from the House, where he served since 1995, last week to begin his new job as director of the Illinois Department of Agriculture, to which he was appointed by Rauner.
If Team Rauner and the local GOP can keep any other Republican candidate off the ballot, they’ll have a very good shot at winning. Rauner won the district, but so did Jim Oberweis. Jesse White and Lisa Madigan won it, so I suppose that gives the Democrats a tiny ray of hope, and Democratic turnout will be stronger next year than it was last year. But just imagine a Raunerite House member in the 99th. That would truly be something.
77 Comments
|
Oops
Wednesday, Nov 18, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Yesterday at 4:43 pm…
NRDC: Senator Kirk Votes to Ignore Climate Change
CHICAGO (November 17, 2015) – Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL) voted for a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution that would block the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) rule to cut dangerous carbon pollution from power plants. President Obama is expected to swiftly veto the parliamentary maneuver, which has rarely been successfully used by Congress.
The following is a statement by Henry Henderson, Midwest Director of the Natural Resources Defense Council:
“Senator Kirk admits that climate change is real and a huge threat to our future. But he votes to kill the only proposal out there to take action to meet the huge threat: the Clean Power Plan. If Senator Kirk opposes the best tool available we have to address climate change, then what is his solution to a problem he calls ‘too important to ignore’?
“The Clean Power Plan will reduce dangerous carbon pollution while creating good jobs, boost the economy and protect public health right here, right now in Illinois. Senator Kirk’s vote against the Clean Power Plan threatens these benefits for all of us — for today and for future generations. Senator Kirk should focus on the people over polluters.”
For more information please see the following:
-Poll showing Illinoisans Ready To Lead On Clean Energy - http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/hhenderson/polling_shows_illinoisans.html
-Henry Henderson Blog - Senator Kirk: If climate is too big to ignore around the world, it is too big to ignore here too: http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/hhenderson/senator_kirk.html
-African American attitudes toward climate change that includes information from Chicago focus groups - http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/aquintero/poll_most_african-americans_co.html
* Yesterday at 6:19 pm…
UPDATED: NRDC: Senator Kirk Votes Against Climate Action Blocking Bill
CHICAGO (November 17, 2015) – Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL) today voted against a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution that would have blocked the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) rule to cut dangerous carbon pollution from power plants.
The following is a statement by Henry Henderson, Midwest Director of the Natural Resources Defense Council:
“Senator Kirk has gone against many in his party leadership that wished to block the Clean Power Plan. The Senator has noted that climate change is real and a huge threat to our future; and today he voted for action.
“The Clean Power Plan will reduce dangerous carbon pollution while creating good jobs, boost the economy and protect public health right here, right now in Illinois. Senator Kirk’s vote today keeps those benefits on the table for Illinoisans now and in the future. I hope that today’s vote forecasts things to come for Senator Kirk.”
NRDC ran ads this summer criticizing Senator Kirk for an earlier vote against the Clean Power Plan.
…Adding… The NRDC may have messed up, but some enviros sang Kirk’s praises after the vote…
23 Comments
|
About that poll
Wednesday, Nov 18, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Politico…
Good Wednesday morning, Illinois. We have first dibs on a new poll that asks Illinois residents about the state’s budget mess. It shows 35 percent of those surveyed point the finger at the Illinois Legislature and another 25 percent blame Gov. Bruce Rauner. The majority of those surveyed want government pensions cut (though respondents were only given four choices). And people overwhelming (81 percent) feel the state’s headed down the wrong track. […]
– This may shock you but — residents don’t want new taxes! The survey of 600 registered Illinois voters shows 66 percent want to plug the state’s $4 billion shortfall by cutting state spending.
– 15 percent support raising taxes.
– 3 percent backed borrowing, 4 percent wanted a combination of raising taxes and spending cuts and 1 percent supported raising taxes and borrowing.
As noted later in the story, the poll was sponsored by Americans for Prosperity Illinois. Yes, AFP is a Koch brothers group, but the state chapter claims it raises its money here. The poll was conducted by Public Opinion Strategies. Click here for the full poll. Crosstabs are here.
* From the poll…
3. Who do you think is more responsible for the wrong direction of the state, (ROTATE) Governor Rauner…or…the Illinois General Assembly?
26% GOVERNOR RAUNER
35% ILLINOIS GENERAL ASSEMBLY
15% BOTH (DO NOT READ)
1% OTHER (SPECIFY: _______) (DO NOT READ)
4% DO NOT KNOW (DO NOT READ)
This is a question asked of only those who said the state was on the wrong track. The question wasn’t about the “state’s budget mess.” It may seem like a minor point, but there’s more to this state’s problems than the budget mess, despite what Speaker Madigan says [/snark].
And even though more people blame the GA for the state’s slide than the governor, it ain’t by much. Add in the 15 percent who said “both” and you get half blaming the GA and 41 percent blaming the governor. He’s not owning it yet, but the GA isn’t the overwhelming villain here, either.
* Also, check out this question about household income…
26% UNDER $40K
24%^ $40K-$80K
40% OVER $80K
That percentage of households earning more than $80K seems kinda high, and the percentage earning under $40K seems a bit low so the answers may be skewed. However, the other xtabs don’t seem too off.
* Also, the majority of respondents clearly believes in magic beans…
Would you favor or oppose a proposal to close the state budget shortfall that would cut one dollar in state spending for every one dollar in additional taxes?
(IF FAVOR/OPPOSE) And, would you STRONGLY (favor/oppose) or just SOMEWHAT (favor/oppose) this proposal?
To help close the state budget shortfall, which of the following programs and services would you prefer to see cut? (RANDOMIZE) (ACCEPT MULTIPLE RESPONSES)
53% GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE PENSIONS
6% MEDICAID FUNDING
22% PUBLIC ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
3% EDUCATION FUNDING
1% ALL OF THE ABOVE (DO NOT READ)
16% NONE OF THE ABOVE (DO NOT READ)
3% DON’T KNOW (DO NOT READ)
1% REFUSED (DO NOT READ)
If you want a dollar for dollar tax hike/budget cuts, let’s see the cuts, because, regardless of what the majority thinks, cutting government employee pensions is not gonna work.
91 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Comments Off
|
Question of the day
Tuesday, Nov 17, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* State Sen. Napoleon Harris (D-Harvey) kicked off his US Senate campaign today…
But in responding to reporters’ questions about international events, Harris at times appeared ill-prepared.
While his campaign issued a handout in which Harris voiced support for “shifting the focus of our foreign aid from the Middle East back to the Americas,” the candidate did not directly respond to a question about how that position would affect U.S. aid to Israel.
“Right now, we’re still developing all of our policies in regards to foreign policy. But I think what’s important is to realize we have a lot of work to do at home, and the intent is to make sure that first we take care of home and our neighboring countries,” he said.
When asked about Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner’s Monday call to temporarily stop accepting Syrian refugees in Illinois, Harris said, “I haven’t heard about Gov. Rauner’s comments on that” and said the governor should “get a balanced budget.”
* The Questions: Other topics that Sen. Harris might want to avoid?
Snark is heavily encouraged.
44 Comments
|
* Rep. Ken Dunkin on last week’s Child Care Assistance Program deal he says he helped cut with Gov. Bruce Rauner…
“Child care was at the center of the table right now, close to a billion dollars in funding. To have that program up and running, up at least at 85 percent, and until we receive a budget, a full budget, it will be back to the full restoration of 185 percent above the poverty level. That’s a success.”
To explain, the governor slashed the program’s maximum eligibility from 185 percent of the federal poverty level to 50 percent. Democratic legislators negotiated a deal to raise that requirement to 162 percent of FPL, and then, according to Rep. Dunkin and others, it would return to 185 percent when a budget deal was finally completed.
* Well, JCAR met today to vote on the new rule and Democratic members attempted to get the Department of Human Services on record as saying the bar would be raised to 185 percent of FPL once a budget agreement is reached. It didn’t go as expected…
* I just talked to Sen. Toi Hutchinson, who actually did negotiate the CCAP compromise.
“That is not what I agreed to,” she said about today’s DHS claims.
It was her understanding, Hutchinson said, that the rate “would go back to 185″ once there is a budget. “It didn’t have anything to do with a bipartisan commission determining the rate,” she said.
“At this point I am waiting for the governor’s office to clarify,” she said.
Hutchinson had agreed to hold the bill to codify the 185 percent level, but that bill died in the House (when Dunkin didn’t vote either way), so she no longer has any leverage. “We don’t have anything other than the governor’s word,” she said.
*** UPDATE 1 *** After some initial confusion, Team Rauner has responded on the record…
The deal stands. 185% when there’s a budget with recommendations for further policy changes coming from the bipartisan commission.
I asked if what Bassi said was in error…
I think the statement I just sent speaks for itself
*** UPDATE 2 *** Sen. Hutchinson called the Rauner folks just before they issued the statement to me. She said it was important that the administration went on the record today with the clarification, adding “This is an exercise in trust, and that’s the only thing that’s going to get us out of this.”
Yep.
*** UPDATE 3 *** A text from Rep. André Thapedi, a member of JCAR who pressed DHS about the 185 percent issue…
Rich, I saw the statement on the blog. I have taken enough depositions and tried enough cases to know that proffered statement is not an unequivocal answer to my straightforward question. There is no unequivocal commitment to 185% of the FLP when the budget is done. That leads me to believe we won’t be seeing the 185% anytime soon, if ever. I hope the governor’s people will clarify this as I have people in my district scared to death and looking for answers and certainty.
André
*** UPDATE 4 *** Emily Miller at Voices for Illinois Children…
After initial confusion, Voices for Illinois Children was relieved to read the governor’s office clarification that the agreement made to fully restore child care stands. Upon passage of an FY16 budget, child care assistance will be fully restored to all families up to 185% of the federal poverty level.
While it was unfortunate that the Department of Human Services’ representative wasn’t clear on the Governor’s position at the JCAR hearing on child care today, it’s fair to say that everyone involved is very busy and invested in this process, and in this instance, perhaps lines of communication got crossed.
The next step is to work together, try to trust one another, and hold each other accountable so that lawmakers and the governor can pass a fully funded, year-long budget invests in children, families and communities. At that point, child care eligibility will be restored to 185% of the federal poverty level, which is a good thing for working families.
*** UPDATE 5 *** Press release…
Following is the statement of SEIU Healthcare Illinois Child Care Vice President Brynn Seibert regarding confusing testimony today by Bruce Rauner administration officials that appeared to renege on a deal to restore the Child Care Assistance Program (CCAP) eligibility requirements.
“Today’s JCAR hearing confirmed our worst fears about the hastily-conjured “deal” Bruce Rauner hatched last week—that his face-saving political gesture provides no ironclad assurances that child care in Illinois will be restored to full health when a budget deal is struck and after suffering needless and devastating cuts.
“Today, not only was the Rauner administration unable to identify supposed savings, or quantify the very real human costs of his cruel actions, or even answer a simple “yes-or-no” question about repairing CCAP, but there remains no way whatsoever to ensure the central part of the Rauner “deal,” announced by his close friend and key ally Ken Dunkin, that the program will return to an eligibility threshold of 185 percent of the Federal Poverty Level.
“Nobody should be prepared to take Rauner at his word, given that he’s left child care in Illinois in tatters. Administratively, in the courtroom and at the bargaining table, Rauner has brought ruin and instability to the Child Care Assistance Program. Today’s administrative hearing provided another shameful heaping of the same.”
*** UPDATE 6 *** Rep. Ken Dunkin via text message…
However folks are trying to twist some statements from a DHS lawyer at JCAR is not my concern. The Governor just reassured me, again his commitment stands on child care. We go back to 185 at budget and take recommendations for policy changes from commission.
…Adding… Another text from Rep. Dunkin…
162 is what Toi & Jehan agreed on. I will make sure we are at 185 when we get a Budget.
111 Comments
|
* Tony Arnold…
The son of longtime U.S. Rep. Bobby Rush (D-Chicago), Flynn Rush is considering getting into the family business. In what would be his first campaign for public office, Rush’s son is considering taking on one of the most established Democrats in Springfield.
Flynn Rush recently filed paperwork with the State Board of Elections to run in the Democratic primary against State Rep. Barbara Flynn Currie, who has represented Chicago’s Hyde Park neighborhood since 1979. She’s the person House Speaker Michael Madigan often relies on for important legislation.
Flynn Rush didn’t return WBEZ’s calls for comment. But his uncle, Marlon Rush, did. Marlon said his nephew is still thinking about challenging Currie, and hasn’t made a final decision. He said the younger Rush thinks not all people of the district have been represented during Flynn Currie’s tenure in Springfield.
“He has a second nature to be concerned for all people,” Marlon said of his nephew. He went on to say that Flynn Rush has worked on previous campaigns of his father, working in polling places and talking with community groups.
Leader Currie’s district was 50 percent black, 22 percent white and 22 percent Latino in the 2010 census.
31 Comments
|
Missing the point
Tuesday, Nov 17, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Well, yeah…
“States lack legal authority to refuse to accept refugees (or any other immigrants) that are admitted by the federal [government],” [Adam Cox, a New York University Law School professor who is an expert in immigration and constitutional law] wrote in an email.
* And, of course…
“There are no barriers, no requirements in the Refugee Act of 1980 that indicate a governor has to give permission to resettle in a state,” [Anna Crosslin, the president of International Institut] said. “That’s all a federal process.”
That’s pretty obvious. We can’t just shut our state borders.
* But the states do have some leverage…
That’s not to say that states can’t make it difficult for Syrian refugees to settle once they are admitted to the United States. Once refugees are on their way to the United States, the State Department works with nine nongovernmental agencies that contract with the federal government on resettlement. Together they decide where to place refugees around the country, based on factors like the availability of jobs and housing and whether there is a local community from their home country that may be helpful, explained Kathleen Newland, a senior fellow at the Migration Policy Institute.
“States do have a role in the refugee resettlement process post admission, and it would certainly be possible for them to obstruct the resettlement process,” she said.
States could instruct their employees not to cooperate with the resettlement program, or they could freeze state-level refugee benefits or federal refugee benefits distributed by the states.
Yep.
* Meanwhile…
All of the attackers from Friday’s massacre in Paris so far have been identified as European Union nationals, according to a top EU official. The announcement further casts doubt on the validity of a Syrian passport found near the bodies of a slain attacker.
“Let me underline, the profile of the terrorists so far identified tells us this is an internal threat,” Federica Mogherini, the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice-President of the European Commission, said after a meeting with EU foreign ministers. “It is all EU citizens so far. This can change with the hours, but so far it is quite clear it is an issue of internal domestic security.”
The majority of attackers were identified as French or Belgian nationals. An Egyptian passport was also found, but the Egyptian Ambassador to France said it belonged to a critically wounded victim and not a perpetrator. The Syrian passport caused a ruckus, with some politicians in Europe and the U.S. calling for a halt to Syrian refugee resettlement. An increasing number of state governors are trying to defund the settlement program. American officials told CBS News that the passport might be fake, while British-daily the Independent reported that a man was arrested in Serbia while carrying a Syrian passport with matching details to the one found in Paris.
* Related…
* ADDED: The Economist: After refugees are referred by an American embassy or the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, they are screened by Department of State Resettlement Service Centers all over the world. They undergo multiple investigations of their biographies; biometric checks of their fingerprints and photographs; in-depth interviews by highly trained Department of Homeland Security officers; medical screenings as well as investigations by the National Counterterrorism Center and by intelligence agencies. The entire process can take longer than three years. If a potential terrorist is determined to enter America to do harm, there are easier and faster ways to get there than by going through the complex refugee resettlement process.
* ADDED: Sen. Dick Durbin: “I want to add my voice to others here today in sharing my deepest condolences and solidarity with the people of that great nation,” said Durbin. “Some have reacted to the tragedy in France by calling for us to suspend refugees coming to this country. Many of these people have not reflected on the refugee situation in our country. Each year, the United States accepts about 70,000 refugees from around the world. These refugees are each carefully investigated, reviewed, and vetted. That process takes anywhere from 18 to 24 months before a refugee from any part of the world is allowed to enter the United States. We do everything humanly possible and take extraordinary efforts to make certain that dangerous people do not arrive on our shores. That vetting process must continue, and when it comes to suspicious circumstances, must be doubled in its intensity to make certain that our nation is safe. But those who are focusing on that as the answer to what happened in Paris are very shortsighted.”
* ADDED: McCarthy at counterterrorism workshop: Tactics must change: “I think the nature of hostage situations has also changed, because [the Paris gunmen] took hostages, but what were they doing? They were killing them. So we can’t use those tactics that we’ve used in the past where we surround, contain, talk, try and negotiate. We’re going to be in a combat situation if these things happen and we have to adjust our strategies in that way.”
* Chicago mayor says his Paris trip for climate meeting is still on despite ‘vile attack’
* Gutierrez rips Rauner move to ban Syrian refugees
* Alderman Rips Rauner in Letter to Obama
91 Comments
|
* Either the Democrats get in front of this issue, or they’re gonna get run over by it…
More than 400,000 Illinoisans have signed petitions to put the Independent Map Amendment on the November 2016 ballot.
These petition signers want to give voters a choice between an independent commission drawing state legislative maps in a fair and transparent manner and the current system where politicians draw the maps to maximize partisan advantage and protect incumbents.
The non-partisan Independent Maps coalition announced Tuesday that it has collected 402,109 signatures and is now more than two-thirds of the way to its goal of collecting 600,000 signatures.
“Just like in Ohio where on November 3rd a redistricting reform initiative passed 71-29 percent, Illinoisans are clamoring for change in the way state legislative maps are drawn,” said Dennis FitzSimons, Chair of Independent Maps. “After seeing 60 percent of state legislative races go uncontested in November 2014 because of slanted maps drawn to discourage competition and protect incumbents, voters want to fix a rigged system.” […]
“We reached the 400,000 mark about five months earlier than the 2014 campaign, and we will continue collecting signatures until it is time to deliver our petitions to the State Board of Elections next May,” he said. “To put an amendment before voters, the Illinois Constitution requires a minimum of 290,216 valid signatures, and our goal is to collect more than twice that number as insurance against petition challenges by the entrenched interests who oppose reform.”
39 Comments
|
Today’s number: $835,000
Tuesday, Nov 17, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Keep this in mind when you’re thinking that the Democrats are preparing to cave on union issues…
House Speaker Michael Madigan on Monday reported another $321,000 in campaign contributions to his personal campaign fund and the Democratic Party of Illinois fund. An operating engineers political fund contributed nearly $106,000 of that total, and three personal injury law firms contributed nearly $65,000. Unions and the trial lawyers are siding with the Democrats, as Republican Gov. Rauner wants to scale back collective bargaining rights and approve changes to the civil lawsuit system.
The operating engineers fund has doled out nearly $835,000 since Jan. 1, most of it to Democratic lawmakers. One of the law firms, Power Rogers & Smith, has given nearly $95,000 in the same period. Corboy & Demetrio has given around $90,000. Keefe & Keefe has given more than $115,000.
…Adding… A commenter makes a valid point…
This is about more than money. Members of organized labor live in these districts, attend our functions, know the issues in a very personal and technical manner, and have the same philosophy on the issues as Dem lawmakers.
They are not only members of the same team, but have been for decades.
39 Comments
|
* Unintended consequences of the governor’s Turnaround Agenda? Maybe. Here’s Parkland Community College President Tom Ramage…
Ramage said he hopes Parkland’s board of trustees opts next month to raise the college’s property tax rate to the maximum to capture as much money as possible before statewide tax caps go into effect.
He said the board can raise two small funds — tort and immunity, and protection, health and safety — to get more property tax money.
Ramage estimated that the tax increase to the typical homeowner in the Parkland district would be about $15 next year.
“If we’re looking at a tax cap going in to next year, it seems to me that we would want to maximize to the extent possible the amount of revenue we bring in now while we have a chance. That needs to be passed by the trustees. They need to agree or to not agree to that,” Ramage told a meeting of the college’s faculty and staff Monday morning.
“If they do agree, it’s up us to tell our neighbors and our friends and our parents and our kids and whoever, why their tax bill for Parkland College went up 15 bucks. Because it will never go up again, is the answer to that story, if tax caps happen.”
He called it “a one-time opportunity to cushion the effect of tax caps.”
Ramage said Parkland has benefited from natural growth in the assessed valuation of the property within its 10 counties.
“If this law is passed this year, the effect on Parkland would be that the amount of money in actual dollars that Parkland takes in this year in property taxes would be frozen, perhaps indefinitely,” he said. “The legislation says two years but it is a very, very difficult thing to get property tax caps removed once they’re in place. You might imagine why. It sounds like a good thing to the general citizenry.”
55 Comments
|
A moderate mushroom revolt
Tuesday, Nov 17, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* A week ago yesterday, I told subscribers about how some House Republicans were pushing Gov. Bruce Rauner to come up with some compromises on child care, elder care and municipal government funding, among other things. That push got lost in the shuffle when Democratic state Rep. Ken Dunkin sided with the governor on crucial floor votes. Reboot picks up the trail…
Gov. Bruce Rauner finally might be heeding messages from more experienced Republican legislators. And those lawmakers are listening to their constituents. […]
Dunkin might take the credit, but House Republicans were telling Rauner and his aides that he had choked off too much state aid for child care by shrinking the eligibility requirement too dramatically. Some of them were going to have trouble staying with the governor if the House Democrats called a bill to try to take power away from governors to rewrite such eligibility rules.
Rauner got the message. He’d lost that battle already, or was about to, so he compromised and declared victory early Monday morning by agreeing to ease up on the requirements. When Democrats pushed ahead with an attempt to take away the power anyway, Republicans saw the danger in that and stayed with Rauner, who got Dunkin to go along, blocking the move. […]
State Rep. David Harris, a conservative Arlington Heights Republican who previously served 10 years in the 1980s and 1990s and has four years in the House now, said, “There were a number of us who were concerned about child care. There also was the sensitivity of the issue.” […]
State Rep. David McSweeney, a wealthy conservative from Barrington who isn’t as reliant on Rauner’s financial aid, agreed: “I applaud him for doing it, but let’s move on” to the budget and pensions. […]
Harris said seven or eight Republicans told the governor’s office they could no longer hold back from voting for a bill sponsored by Democratic state Rep. Marty Moylan of Des Plaines to release funds to pay municipalities the motor fuel tax receipts that are not part of the annual budgeting process, but instead are held in a special fund, as well as gambling proceeds and the 911 fees held in special funds.
Moderate, practical House Republican members are crucial to solving this mess. They’ve been forced to take innumerable bad votes by the House Speaker and their governor all year, and many have had more than enough, thank you very much.
More like this, please.
76 Comments
|
Ken Dunkin roundup
Monday, Nov 16, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* CBS 2…
The Democratic state lawmaker who thwarted House Speaker Michael Madigan’s plan to overrule Gov. Bruce Rauner on two crucial votes this week said he hopes his action helps bring more compromises in Springfield.
Rep. Ken Dunkin (D-Chicago) admitted he hasn’t spoken to Madigan in a while.
“I miss the speaker. He should call more often,” he said.
* A letter to the Sun-Times’ editor written by somebody from Gurnee…
With no budget, and the Hatfields and McCoys of Springfield in full attack mode, a politician finally has the guts to stand up to the almighty House Speaker and do the unthinkable: risk his political future by making a bi-partisan gesture to end the gridlock.
What does Rep. Ken Dunkin get for his efforts? A Democratic colleague throws his nameplate across the House floor to the side of the Republicans. And the president of a powerful union attacked him for using people as pawns.
Someone actually has the guts to stand up for what is right, to end the unfathomable gridlock we are in, to stand up to the most powerful man in Illinois saying “I don’t work for Madigan”, and this is what he gets? When you can’t get any respect for doing the right thing from your own party, nor from the media, nor the very people you are working for, something is wrong to the very core of our government. No wonder this state is so messed up. Here’s a slogan I would rally behind: Dunkin for Speaker.
But alas there is something else too broken to fix. The most powerful man in the state is still elected by a handful of residents. The speaker position should be a statewide elected position. The power of that office extends across the state from Antioch to Jacksonville; why shouldn’t all of our residents have a say in who wields the sword?
* Eric Zorn’s two cents…
The only thing that’s clear is that this rogue legislator has, in effect, for no obvious good reason, called Madigan out. And that if Madigan, who also serves as the state’s Democratic Party chairman, can’t respond to this insult by backing a successful challenge to Dunkin in the March primary, he’s in bigger trouble than he thinks.
* Dispatch-Argus editorial…
Instead of embracing the governor’s efforts, they called bills designed to embarrass him and his Republican legislative supporters. Fortunately, the bills fell one vote short In the House. That was thanks to Rep. Ken Dunkin, D-Chicago, who reportedly still is feeling the heat for his efforts to find common ground with Gov. Rauner.
But rather than damn his actions, his colleagues and their constituents should be following his lead. As Rep. Dunkin said last week, “Leaders are not talking with each other. They haven’t talked since May, as I understand it. That’s insane. And so they want to vilify me, for what?”
To win the political finger-pointing game, of course.
The crucial question is: Is it working?
With the governor’s wise moves and the majority’s cynical response, our hope is that legislative leaders may have lost the crucial public relations battle that obviously is playing the leading role in when and how a deal is reached and what it will contain.
* Listen to Dunkin interviewed on WVON by clicking here. However, be forewarned, there’s a bad word near the end.
35 Comments
|
* We’ve crossed over into the surreal…
TO: Governor Bruce Rauner
Speaker of the House Michael J. Madigan
Senate President Cullerton
FROM: Jeffrey B. Ford, President, at the request of The Board of Directors of the Illinois Association of Problem-Solving Courts (ILAPSC)
RE: Effects of Budget Delay
DATE: November 12, 2015
We write to express our concerns about the effects which the delay in passing a state budget has on our membership and the clients they serve. The ILAPSC is a multi-disciplinary, statewide organization whose mission is to provide education, assistance, training and development through collaboration of behavioral health and justice systems. Our Board consists of four judges, one state’s attorney, one current and one retired public defender, two TASC directors, four members of court services, three directors of Problem-Solving Courts in their counties, one drug court coordinator, one representative from NAMI, a county mental health board director and one mental health court graduate. Geographically we are from as far north as McHenry and Winnebago Counties, as far west as Rock Island and Madison Counties, as far east as Cook and Champaign Counties and as far south as Marion and Wabash Counties. Our recent conference was attended by 483 people with even more diversity in occupations and geography than our board.
Currently, the State of Illinois has 62 Drug Courts, 25 Mental Health Courts, 18 Veterans Courts and 2 DUI Courts. Each Problem-Solving Court partners with the social service agencies in their area to provide the treatment and social support that each defendant needs to succeed. The Problem-Solving Court Team, including appropriate professionals from local service agencies, works out an individual treatment plan for each defendant. Most of these agencies depend on state funding for many of the services they provide.
It is important to note that we make no statement regarding the politics and policy differences involved in the budget delay. We understand that you are working diligently to try to resolve these differences. However, while this process continues, important aspects of daily life in Illinois are threatened. The work of each of Illinois’ Problem-Solving Courts (PSCs) is to help our citizens avoid incarceration by monitoring their progress while they receive treatment, counseling and other services. Research has shown that if the correct population is targeted by PSCs, these Courts can save money and reduce recidivism. By funding the services necessary to continue the work of Illinois’ PSCs, we become, as a state, smart on crime.
Unfortunately, because of the delay in passing a State budget, many of these agencies are being forced to cut services, lay off staff, close intake and even, in some cases, close their doors altogether. Many are expending their cash reserves to continue to provide the services their clients need while others are forced to take out lines of credit. Because banks will only offer lines of credit if they are assured they will be honored, the current budget delay calls into question the social service agencies’ ability to repay those loans.
The Governor has a stated goal of reducing the prison population by 25% over the next ten years, and has appointed a commission to recommend ways to make this happen. We applaud this effort. But the Commission’s own Initial Report notes, “Alternatives to incarceration, as well as efforts to reduce recidivism, will require a focus on community treatment programs, particularly those involving substance abuse and mental health.” The report also states that over the past several years funding for state mental health and substance abuse treatment has been declining. The report was issued July 1 of this year, well before the lack of a state budget reduced that funding even further.
Without the financial support of a full and comprehensive budget, Illinois’ PSCs cannot do their job. Instead of saving money and reducing crime, the current situation will (1) increase costs associated with crime (including costs to victims, the costs of the justice system and the costs of incarceration), (2) increase the number of children involved in the juvenile justice and foster care systems and (3) some of our citizens will continue to sink further into addiction and mental illness.
As State leaders, we call upon you to redouble your efforts to bring an end to the budget delay, work together to repair the damage done and strive to bind up the State’s wounds caused by this delay so that all the citizens of Illinois can go on with their lives.
10 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Question of the day
Monday, Nov 16, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From the twitters this morning…
* A text from a pal…
Madigan’s City Club speech was sold out 5 minutes after going on sale. Is he the new Taylor Swift?
* An e-mail from another pal shortly before noon…
Tickets sold out in 5 minutes…
It took Donald Trump 11 minutes…..
Waiting list almost 1,000
* The Question: Topics that Speaker Madigan should probably avoid during his City Club address?
Snark is heavily encouraged, of course.
95 Comments
|
*** UPDATE 1 *** From a Republican member of the working group…
“These represent items that a bipartisan, bicameral group of independent legislators said ‘Here are some things to get the conversation started.’”
So, just to be clear, not everybody in the working group agrees with all of these things, and as I told subscribers weeks ago, the governor and some Republicans wanted more reforms before agreeing to any new revenues.
*** UPDATE 2 *** OK, so from what I’m told, the Democrats presented the Republicans with these items, but they were rejected by the governor and the GOP as being “not enough reform” for the amount of revenue involved.
[ *** End Of Updates *** ]
* As I told you in the previous post, the IllinoisGO “mega deal” list looked very similar to me as the proposals from a bipartisan group of legislators which ended up going nowhere when the governor turned thumbs down. Here is that list…
Spending and budget reforms
1. $36B FY16 spending level – below the General Assembly budget passed in May – with reductions in group health, transfers & discretionary spending this year and over $900m additional operational reductions in FY17
2. Pay off bill backlog over 5 years
3. Make full pension payments
4. Ensure childcare, community care and other social service programs are funded
5. Provide stability and certainty for at least 5 years
6. Enact an emergency reserve fund
7. Eliminate future rolling of bills
Revenue
1. Pass a revenue plan that provides $3B in FY16 and grows to $5B
2. Broaden sales tax base to cover services similar to Wisconsin
3. Tax retirement income over $50,000
4. Increase personal income tax rate to 4.5%
5. Expand the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) 50%
6. Raise corporate income tax rate to 6.75%
7. Eliminate 3 corp. tax credits (domestic production, noncombination rule and offshore drilling) & make R&D credit permanent
8. Eliminate corp. franchise tax and lower LLC fees
9. Recouple inheritance tax with the federal government
10. Repeal E-10 subsidy (ethanol)
Capital Plan
1. Develop a capital program to fund much needed water, sewer, road, public transit, school and other public infrastructure needs.
2. Create a vehicle miles travelled pilot
3. Apply any road portion to local roads as well as state roads w/criteria for accessing state dollars
Substantive Reforms
Local control
1. Allow (but not require) all school districts to bargain over 3rd party contracting, layoffs, class size, school year & technology (like CPS)
2. Enable school districts to enter into 3rd party contracts
3. Modify arbitration selection process
4. Make contracts subject to appropriation
5. Enable a “reset” for healthcare & prohibit employers from awarding plans that would impose the “Cadillac tax”
6. Broaden local preference for Project Labor Agreements and ensure PLAs apply to construction only (not maintenance) projects
7. Set $150,000 threshold for prevailing wage (PW), enabling diversity in participation, and clarify homes in TIF districts are not subject to PW
8. Allow municipalities to form health care co-ops
9. Create disincentive for schools to pickup employee share of pension costs
Property tax freeze/education funding reform
1. Enact a 2 year property tax freeze excluding public safety
2. Establish pension parity for CPS w/sunset & alter CPS pension ramp
3. Sunset General State Aid formula 6/1/17 and create a stakeholder committee to propose new formula by 12/31/16 and identify needed $ to prevent any district from losing.
Business/regulatory reforms
1. Implement substantive Workers compensation reforms
2. Modify Unemployment insurance to alter the def’n of misconduct, eliminate the social security offset, & extend “speed bumps”
3. Raise the minimum wage to $11 over time (Lightford bill)
4. Mandate reporting from contractors on minority workforce participation
Pension reform
1. Establish a tier 3 cash balance plan
2. Fix Tier 2 to link salary cap to social security wage base
3. Address pension spiking
4. Modify police and fire pension ramp schedules
Keep in mind that this was a bipartisan working group. Some Democrats are obviously willing to go much further with labor union-related reforms than House Speaker Michael Madigan will admit.
40 Comments
|
IllinoisGO floats mega deal
Monday, Nov 16, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Greg Hinz…
A top political operative with ties on both sides of the aisle is shopping a big-picture compromise plan to resolve Illinois’ budget war, and while it includes something to offend almost every interest group, its author says it’s received at least some positive feedback from Springfield powers.
The plan comes from Greg Goldner, a former campaign manager for ex-Mayor Richard M. Daley and then-Congressman Rahm Emanuel whom some in Springfield nonetheless consider a front for GOP Gov. Bruce Rauner, even though he now runs the well-funded Democratic group Illinoisans for Growth and Opportunity.
The proposal, quietly discussed with political leaders in recent days, calls for an increase in the state income tax, extension of the sales tax to cover more services and a tax on some form of retirement income. […]
I won’t be surprised if Madigan balks, particularly since the speaker has personally accused Goldner of preparing to field candidates against Democrats in the upcoming primary.
Goldner denies doing that, at least so far. “We have not recruited candidates—to date,” he put it.
It’s not a horrible plan (from what I can gather, the revenue stuff looks very much like a bipartisan proposal by mostly female legislators which went nowhere when the governor turned thumbs down), but it has the worst possible supporter considering the times. Despite what Goldner claims about his candidate recruitment, he might as well just let Ken Dunkin sponsor his bill. Sheesh.
* Most of the dot points…
INCREASE REVENUES, CUT SPENDING & LIMIT GROWTH […]
• Increase the Personal Income Tax. +$3.3B/YR Increasing the personal income tax rate to 4.75% from the current level of 3.75% would generate roughly $3.3 billion in additional net revenue per year. Assuming passage of a bill before the end of the taxable year, this tax should be applied retroactively from July 1, 2015, for FY 2016. While the Civic Federation recommends 4.25%, given the massive scale of the problems for FY 2016 due to the failure to pass a budget, this rate would be insufficient at this time. [Center for Tax and Budget Accountability, 9/09/15]
• Increase the Earned Income Tax Credit to Offset Broad Tax Increases. -$136M/YR To offset the regressive impact of higher income tax rates and a broader sales tax on low income residents, the state should gradually increase its Earned Income Tax Credit to 15% of the federal amount by FY 2018 from the current 10%. Using the estimated FY 2016 federal EITC of $2.7 billion, increasing the state EITC by five percentage points would cost approximately $136 million in addition to the current credit.
• Increase the Corporate Income Tax to 5.75%. +350M/YR Increasing the corporate tax from its current 5.25% to 5.75% would bring in an additional $350 million a year. The tax should be applied retroactively from July 1, 2015, for FY 2016.
• Maintain the Local Distributive Share Rate at 8% (Personal) and 9.14% (Corporate) After the Tax Increases. -$296M/YR Keep the portion of the state personal income tax for local governments at 8% and the corporate income tax at 9.14%, the current allocations through the Local Government Distributive Fund (LGDF), after the tax increases. In 2011, the local distributive share was held constant, despite the income tax increase. The City of Chicago estimated that it would have received more than $400 million in total additional revenues if local governments had not been excluded from sharing in increased income tax revenues from 2011 until 2015. Under a 4.75% tax rate, preserving this 8% and 9.14% shares for local governments would generate an additional $296 million for local governments beyond current levels.
• Eliminate Corporate Loopholes. +$400M/YR Limiting EDGE tax credits, eliminating tax breaks for companies investing out of state by decoupling Illinois’s exemption from the federal domestic production deduction, taxing income held offshore as domestic income, taxing companies in Illinois for offshore drilling, and closing accounting loopholes like requiring combined reporting would generate $400 million a year.
• Expand the Sales Tax to Consumer Services. +$2.1B/YR Illinois ranks last among the 45 states that levy a sales tax on services in the number of service industries it taxes. Expanding the sales tax base to include consumer services - while continuing to exclude professional and business-to-business services - would generate nearly $2.1 billion more. This would also increase funding to local governments by an additional $529 million, as 1.25% of the purchase price collected is distributed to local governments. B2B transactions are excluded because they encourage “tax pyramiding,” while only six of 45 states tax any professional services, as it is complicated and cumbersome to do so.
• Immediately Cut $1 Billion from Expenditures. -$1.7B While Moody’s recommends $1.7 billion of expenditure cuts for FY 2016, less than half the $3.7 billion of savings in the governor’s proposed budget that were not related to employee benefit reductions, $1 billion is more practical immediate goal. Cuts should hold harmless education funding and funding for human service providers, which was not funded through a mandatory appropriation or court order, and thus have already been subject to massive cuts, the failure to receive due payments, and uncertainty for FY 2016.
• Restrict Discretionary Spending Growth. +$260M/YR The state should restrict discretionary spending growth from the 2.7% level shown in its three-year projections to 2.0%, closer to the rate of inflation. This could reduce total state spending by $1.3 billion over five years. Funding for K-12 education should not be subject to mandatory cuts.
• License Chicago to Operate a Casino. +$200M/YR The state should license the City of Chicago to operate its own casino, with proceeds earmarked to pay for City pensions. The casino would also generate $200 million in gambling taxes for the state.
INVEST IN EDUCATION […]
• Increase State K-12 Education Funding With Revenues from a Retirement Tax and Commit to Reforms. Numerous studies have ranked Illinois last, or nearly last nationally in state education funding. According to statistics compiled by the National Education Association, in 2013-2014 the average portion received from the state to fund K-12 schools was 46.4%, whereas Illinois provided only 19.6% of total funding. The U.S. Census reports that on average, U.S. states provide $5,650 per student on education, while Illinois provides only $5,021. Increasing education funding from the state by $1.05 billion from a retirement tax would not even put Illinois as “middle of the pack,” but is a good start.
• Tax Some Retirement Income to Benefit K-12 Education. $1.05B/YR (revenue neutral) Illinois is one of only five states with an income tax that does not tax any retirement income. This tax base would also expand over time at a higher rate than regular income. Eliminating the full deduction for retirement income on a graduated basis for adjusted gross incomes over $50,000 would raise $1.05 billion in new revenue at a 4.75% income tax rate, while protecting low and fixed income seniors. The whole of this tax should go to education.
• Reform Education Funding to Make the System Fair. Illinois has the most unfair school funding system in the nation, with students living in poverty receiving nearly twenty percent less than more affluent students. A single, fair, and need-based funding formula should replace the current opaque and complex system, which has not updated since 1997. A bipartisan committee will study how best to develop a new system for school funding for two years, while at the end of those two years, the existing and outdated GSA formula would be abolished.
• Provide Relief for Chicago Public Schools and Create School District Mandate Parity. -$200M/YR over 2 YRS Require the state to pick up the $200 million annual “normal costs” of Chicago teachers’ pensions for two years, at which time the state-wide education funding reform process will consider the future treatment of Chicago Teacher’s Pension Fund. School districts comprise approximately 60 percent of an Illinois property tax bill. In addition to increasing public support for schools, all districts should be given the relief from mandates that the City of Chicago has been given, to achieve savings for taxpayers and improve outcomes for children. Repealing the statute that severely restricts third-party contracting and providing schools relief from other unfunded mandates will free up additional resources to invest in the classroom.
IMPROVE GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS AND INSTITUTE REFORMS […]
• Pass the Cullerton Pension Reform Plan. +$1B/YR State workers should choose between two options: keep the 3% annual compounded interest on cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) and give up the ability to count pay raises toward pensions or continue counting salary increases toward pensions and take a decreased, non-compounded COLA. This will generate an estimated $1 billion in savings a year. [Chicago Tribune, 5/13/15]
• Study the Consolidation of Local Pension Funds. Because state law requires municipalities of 5,000+ residents to create employee pension funds, Illinois has more than 600 individual, locally-controlled pension funds for cops and firefighters outside the city of Chicago. Consolidating these funds across Illinois can save money on administrative costs, similar to the way municipal workers’ retirements are structured. [WBEZ, 5/12/14; CGFA Report, January 2013; Msall, Chicago Tribune, 9/17/15]
• Create a Realistic Repayment Timeline for the State’s Five Pension Funds. For years, state legislators borrowed against what was owed to the pension systems to subsidize operating expenses. This practice became law and established a “Pension Ramp” that provided for an “incredibly back loaded repayment schedule, which grew in unattainable, unaffordable annual increments.” The current repayment schedule, arbitrarily established by Springfield, is unsustainable and unaffordable. While borrowing and pension holidays in part created this mess and are not the answer, the state must create a new, realistic repayment timeline as it is obligated by the Constitution to pay for its pension commitment. There are excess revenues in this plan that should be devoted to appropriate legacy pension debt payment, as determined by legislative action. [Center for Tax and Budget Accountability, 9/09/15]
• Create a Realistic Repayment Timeline for Fire and Police Pension Funds Across Illinois. Locally controlled police and fire pension payment schedules were also arbitrarily dictated by the General Assembly, including the City of Chicago and Cook County. Legislators should reconsider these schedules, as in the bill passed by the General Assembly this session that deferred from 2040 to 2055 the date by which the police and fire funds must have at least 90 percent of the assets needed to pay promised retirement benefits.
• Increase the State’s Minimum Wage. Increase the state minimum wage to $11 an hour by 2019. The minimum wage would increase to $9 immediately, with the wage go up by 50 cents annually until it hits $11 in 2019.
• Reform Workers Compensation in a Bipartisan Manner. -$300M/YR The Illinois workers compensation system ranks the seventh most expensive in the country by the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services study, indicating the need for further reform. To control costs, the state should look at tighter causation definitions and applying the rates of reimbursement recommended by the AMA. Reform would save the state roughly $300 million per year on its own expenses. […]
• Reform the Collective Bargaining Scope for Public Employees. The state should reform our collective bargaining laws, allowing units of government to curb rising public employee costs by limiting collective bargaining for specific personnel issues, including health benefits and work rules.
Discuss.
48 Comments
|
* Gov. Bruce Rauner…
“Our nation and our state have a shared history of providing safe haven for those displaced by conflict, but the news surrounding the Paris terror attacks reminds us of the all-too-real security threats facing America. We must find a way to balance our tradition as a state welcoming of refugees while ensuring the safety and security of our citizens. Therefore, the state of Illinois will temporarily suspend accepting new Syrian refugees and consider all of our legal options pending a full review of our country’s acceptance and security processes by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.”
On the one hand, I can see the worry about terrorists slipping in with the refugees.
On the other hand, however, those refugees are leaving Syria to flee those very same terrorists.
Ugh.
…Adding… We’re not talking big numbers. From September…
So far in 2015, 94 refugees from Syria have been resettled in Illinois, 62 of them in Chicago, according to data from the Refugee Processing Center, operated by the U.S. State Department. That’s about three times the placements in all of last year, with 24 Syrian refugees resettled in Illinois, 18 of which were in Chicago. Those numbers, though, don’t include Syrians seeking asylum, a separate process.
…Adding More… According to CBS, other Republican governors have done the same, including in Indiana, Michigan and Alabama.
…Adding Still More… A state by state look is here.
*** UPDATE 1 *** I just had a long conversation with someone in the administration. I think people on both sides should probably stand down. The key word here is “temporarily.” They just want to pause this while they get some more assurances from the federal government about who is being brought in, what their backgrounds really are, etc.
Also, they’re very sensitive to the fact that some of these refugees are Christians fleeing radical Islamic tyranny - which some of the far right commenters here and elsewhere should probably try to consider.
Again, it’s a pause, not a full stop.
…Adding… TPM…
To be clear, states still retain the power to deny their own resources to the federal government, so they could potentially make settlement of refugees more difficult than it would be if the states cooperated. Nevertheless, an act of Congress — the Refugee Act of 1980 — has given Obama broad discretion to allow refugees to be admitted into the United States.
And that’s what we’re looking at here - state IDHS resources.
*** UPDATE 2 *** Sen. Mark Kirk vs. Congressman Tammy Duckworth in Crain’s…
“The Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and FBI Director James Comey have cautioned that terrorist infiltration of Syrian refugees is possible based on our limited ability (to) screen all Syrian refugees,” Kirk said in a statement. “No refugee related to the Syrian crisis should be admitted to the United States unless the (Obama) administration can guarantee, with 100 percent assurance, that they are not members, supporters or sympathizers of ISIS.” […]
“We should differentiate between the refugee crisis and those who do the work of ISIS,” [Duckworth] told reporters, noting that her northwest suburban district now is home to 700 refugees. U.S. security personnel know what they are doing, she continued, noting that 20 percent of them are children. “If we don’t deal with the refugee crisis, some of those kids will grow up to be terrorists,” she said.
Duckworth said she “could not imagine” taking her infant daughter, Abigail, packing up their things, and walking across the country to a dingy in the ocean “because that’s safer” than staying home.
“We are better than that as a nation,” she said, noting that she’s supported a plan to allow up to 200,000 to come to America. “We should keep the refugees.”
*** UPDATE 3 *** US Senate candidate Andrea Zopp…
“I believe that this is a humanitarian crisis, and we can’t turn our back on our values. With over a decade of experience in law enforcement, I know better than most that we need to do the proper background checks, but banning Syrian refugees from Illinois makes no sense. This is another example of Governor Rauner ignoring those in need.”
124 Comments
|
What could possibly go wrong?
Monday, Nov 16, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From the Southern…
In a growing number of cash-strapped Southern Illinois counties, state’s attorney’s offices are entering into contracts with third-party debt collectors to encourage payment of alleged delinquent court fines and fees – sometimes for violations that occurred decades ago.
Alexander County, facing $1.6 million in debt, is the latest to enter into a contract with Credit Collection Partners, which has told the county they could be owed in the neighborhood of $2 million in unpaid court fines and fees dating back to at least 1986, and even further back in some cases.
Since early 2013, that Taylorville-based agency has taken on debt collection services for more than 40 Illinois counties, including in this region, in addition to Alexander: Perry, Johnson, Saline, Franklin, White, Gallatin, Wayne, Edwards, Wabash, Hamilton and Marion counties.
Company representatives defend the practice, and the 30 percent fee they charge as allowed under Illinois law, saying they are helping counties collect money owed to the taxpayer from people who have refused to pay legitimate fines and fees assessed by the court for their offenses, be they traffic, misdemeanors or felonies.
But others are questioning the appropriateness of this company and others collecting debts, on behalf of counties, that are decades old – up to 40 years old in some cases. In the court system, statutes of limitations on civil and criminal proceedings exist for a variety of reasons, including that failure to charge or sue someone within a prescribed time makes it too difficult for the person to defend themselves against stale evidence and failing memories, in addition to a general fairness issue.
Can you imagine trying to prove you’d paid a fine decades ago? At least one woman just went through that with a southern Illinois county. Go read the rest.
20 Comments
|
*** UPDATE *** Take a look at the newly highlighted text below. A bone of contention in this suit is a workers’ comp claim filed by Stephanie Yencer-Price. Ms. Yencer-Price was one of the plaintiffs in the landmark Harris v. Quinn case.
Yep, she didn’t want to pay union dues, but now the union is fighting for her right to file a workers’ comp claim.
Seems fair. /snark
* Also, an attorney for the workers just called and asked a valid question: If the state isn’t on the hook for these workers comp claims, then who is? The folks who qualify for these attendants are generally poor and disabled. It’s not like they can pay the claim.
So, what happens when an attendant is injured and can no longer work?
It’s the emergency room and welfare, apparently.
[ *** End Of Update *** ]
* Illinois Policy Institute…
[On November 13th] the Illinois Department of Central Management Services (CMS) filed a lawsuit against Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan alleging she is refusing to discharge her duty to properly defend the state against certain workers compensation claims.
The complaint, styled Tyrell v. Madigan, is linked here. The lawsuit was brought in the name of Tom Tyrell in his capacity as Director of CMS. It pertains to home care workers called “personal assistants.” […]
The central assertion is that Madigan is refusing to put up an obvious and easily supported defense on behalf of taxpayers — that personal assistants are not employees of the state. CMS recites, in the complaint, a list of reasons to support its position, including the recent United States Supreme Court Decision in Harris v. Quinn. That decision, as CMS describes in the complaint, held that personal assistants are private sector employees for all purposes except collective bargaining over wages.
“In addition to refusing to perform her personal, professional and constitutional duties in accordance with law,” the complaint says, Madigan has refused requests by CMS for appointment of a special assistant attorney general to properly defend the claims.
The lawsuit asks the court, essentially, to throw Madigan off the case and appoint a special assistant attorney general to do the job.
…Adding… I’m told that AG Madigan was on the other side of this issue before Gov. Rauner took office.
…Adding More… From CMS…
Hi Rich,
I saw your post and wanted to flag that during previous Administrations, the AG took the view that the personal assistants are not state workers. Here is some info on background on the case:
Tom L. Tyrrell, CMS Director v. Lisa Madigan, Illinois Attorney General
Tom Tyrrell, in his official capacity as CMS Director, administers the Workers’ Compensation program for state employees in the State of Illinois. The Attorney General is preventing him from denying the workers comp claim of a personal assistant who has acknowledged that she is not a state employee and a Sangamon County court has previously ruled was not a state employee.
Personal Assistants are hired by individuals, not by the State, to provide in-home care. One such Personal Assistant, Stephanie Yencer-Price was allegedly injured while performing services to her employer. She then filed a claim for Workers’ Compensation benefits.
Yencer-Price was one of the plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit that reached the Supreme Court and where Yencer-Price argued and the Supreme Court decided in the Harris v. Quinn decision on 6/30/14 that Yencer-Price and other personal assistants are not state employees.
On July 18, 2014, an attorney in the Attorney General’s Office, Amy Oxley, sent an email in response to a worker’s compensation claim by another personal assistant that the Attorney General’s Office would dispute all such claims because of the Supreme Court ruling “that indicates that Personal Assistants, like the petitioner, are not employees of the State of Illinois.”
On July 28, 2014, the Workers Compensation Bureau Chief in the Attorney General’s Office, Jill Ottee, sent an emails directing that all attorneys file Motions to Dismiss in each of their personal assistant cases because the Supreme Court had ruled that personal assistants are not state employees.
On August 6, 2014, Assistant Attorney General Amy Oxley filed a motion to dismiss in Yencer-Price’s workers’ compensation case and stated that the Supreme Court had “analyzed the same factors and evidence that the Commission reviewed in past cases involving personal assistants and determined that as a matter of law, personal assistants are employees of the customers and are private employees” (emphasis in brief). She added “the Supreme Court’s legal determination of the employment status of personal assistants is now controlling authority on the issue.”
On January 20, 2015, in a separate subrogation case pending in Sangamon County involving Yencer-Price, Assistant Attorney General Kmett reversed course and said they were withdrawing their motion to dismiss in the workers’ compensation case because they had “determined” that the Supreme Court ruling in Harris does not “apply to whether or not personal assistants were employees for workers’ compensation purposes.”
On April 20, 2015, the Sangamon County Circuit Court rejected the Attorney General’s argument in the subrogation case and found that “there was no employer/employee relationship between the State of Illinois and Ms. Stephanie Yencer-Price on the date of the accident.” The Attorney General did not file an appeal.
CMS directed the Attorney General to assert this defense in Yencer-Price’s pending Workers’ Compensation case or requested if the AG would not assert such a defense, that they allow CMS to retain its own outside counsel. On August 24, 2015, the Assistant Attorney General refused to allow CMS to be separately represented and refused to raise the defense in Yencer-Price’s case.
On November 3, 2015, Assistant Attorney General Oxley sent an e-mail to CMS saying that Yencer-Price’s workers compensation hearing had been requested and further stated that “the Office of the Attorney General will not be raising the defense of no employer/employee relationship at trial.”
CMS, therefore, was compelled to file this lawsuit against the Attorney General seeking to have its own representation so that it can assert this defense that has previously been recognized against this very same personal assistant.
In analyzing this issue, CMS and Director Tyrrell consulted numerous legal sources, all of which clearly support the determination that Personal Assistants are not employees of the State. Among these sources are (1) the United States Supreme Court decision in Harris v. Quinn, in which the Court explained that Illinois Personal Assistants are not state employees for purposes of Workers’ Compensation program; (2) recent decisions from Illinois courts confirming that Personal Assistants are not state employees; (3) the Attorney General’s own successful arguments in prior cases that Personal Assistants are not state employees; and (4) numerous statutory and administrative references confirming the same. The overwhelming weight of authority place beyond doubt the correctness of CMS and Director Tyrrell’s determination.
Pointing to the obvious ethical conflict that would make it impossible for the Attorney General to serve as CMS’s lawyer before the Commission, CMS requested that the Commission appoint separate counsel to represent CMS before the Commission. This is standard practice in cases when the Attorney General has an ethical conflict that makes it impossible for her to render adequate representation to her client. The Attorney General opposed the request to appoint separate counsel for CMS, insisting that the Attorney General be allowed to represent CMS even though she is refusing to defend CMS’s decision to deny benefits to the Personal Assistant.
By filing this lawsuit, Director Tyrrell is asking for nothing more than what appellate courts in Illinois have already agreed is a government official’s right in cases of clear conflicts with the Attorney General. Just earlier this year, the Fifth District appellate court, relying on precedent from the First District court of appeals, concluded that the Comptroller may speak in court through her own counsel in a case where the Attorney General refused to represent the Comptroller’s position. Director Tyrrell is only asking for the ability to articulate to the Commission how and why he reached the conclusion that the Personal Assistant’s claim for Workers’ Compensation benefits should be denied because she is not an employee of the State of Illinois.
What Director Tyrrell cannot do is stand idly by while the Attorney General is misrepresenting his interest in court. That is especially here, where the Attorney General’s position would mean paying out Workers’ Compensation benefits in situations where the State is not the responsible party. Illinois taxpayers cannot afford to spend money the State does not have on claims that the State is not legally obligated to pay.
Please don’t hesitate to reach out if you have any questions.
Best regards,
Meredith Krantz
Deputy Director & Public Information Officer
Illinois Office of Communication and Information
Department of Central Management Services
34 Comments
|
Today’s number: 48 percent
Monday, Nov 16, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Tim Landis at the SJ-R…
An annual telecommunications update from the Illinois Commerce Commission this summer found that 48 percent of state households relied on wireless-only service at the end of 2014, continuing a decades-long trend that has continued to accelerate. Landline use dropped nearly 36 percent from 2005 to 2014 to approximately 5 million, even when Internet- and cable-based service was included.
In contrast, the ICC estimates that there are nearly 13 million wireless subscribers in Illinois.
The number of POTS lines — the regulatory acronym for “plain old telephone service” — in AT&T territory is dropping by 1,000 a day, according to company estimates. The state’s other major carrier, Verizon Communications, sold its Illinois landlines in 2010 to Frontier Communications. The Federal Communications Commission in August set consumer notification guidelines for carriers planning to end traditional copper-line service. […]
Illinois’ switching is ahead of the nation, according to the CDC, which reported that 41 percent of households nationwide were wireless-only last year. […]
AT&T estimates that only 18 percent of Illinois customers remain on dial-up lines. The company also is pushing for Illinois to join 17 of 21 states in AT&T territory that have authorized telecommunications companies to phase out the old networks once the FCC sets rules for the process. […]
“Those individuals that have traditional landlines have them for a reason,” said Julie Vahling, associate state director for AARP Illinois. “They may live in an area that has poor cellphone coverage, or they may have a medical condition, and they want that reliability.
Thoughts?
43 Comments
|
* My Crain’s Chicago Business column…
Political campaigns are, by necessity, winner take all. Somebody wins, somebody loses.
But nobody ever “wins” everything when governing. It’s a constant series of compromises. And very often when you try too hard to win, you end up losing.
Exelon is a prime example.
Last spring, the Chicago-based energy company, which owns six nuclear power plants in Illinois, swooped into the Statehouse, hired a bunch of Springfield lobbyists and unveiled shiny new legislation.
Exelon claimed that several of its nuke plants were unprofitable and that it would have to shut them down soon, so it proposed a large, consumer-financed $300 million subsidy program for low-carbon sources of electricity, like wind, solar and—nuclear.
But as Steve Daniels wrote in Crain’s back in March, “The bill’s language is so restrictive on which sources could bid for the cash that Exelon’s nukes are virtually certain to get the lion’s share.”
In other words, Exelon wins, everybody else loses.
The non-nuke alternative-energy folks had their own, far more inclusive bill, but Exelon refused to cut a deal—right up until the end of the spring legislative session, when the company was told it would have to wait.
Then on Nov. 7, Daniels wrote about how Exelon’s nuclear plants were suddenly profitable or at least projected to break even.
If the company hadn’t tried to win at the expense of everyone else, it might have consumer subsidies right now. Exelon got greedy and blew it.
Until not that long ago, I would’ve said that Gov. Bruce Rauner was making the same mistake.
Go read the rest before commenting, please. Thanks.
11 Comments
|
State money has nothing to do with this
Monday, Nov 16, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From the Galesburg Register-Mail…
As a result of the state budget crisis, adults will soon have no place to prepare for the GED exams.
On Jan. 1, Carl Sandburg College will suspend its adult education, English as a second language and literacy programs, as these programs are funded by grants that are tied up in Springfield.
“We’re the sole provider, so they’re not going to be able to go anywhere else for coursework,” Sandburg President Lori Sundberg said.
Sandburg is still a testing site for the GED.
Most other community colleges have suspended or will be suspending their adult education courses, Sundberg said, so students are left with nowhere to turn.
Sandburg offers two adult education courses that prepare students for their High School Equivalency certificate — adult secondary education, which used to be known as GED, and adult basic education, which used to be known as pre-GED.
“We haven’t taken any new students since October since we knew that we were going to be suspending,” Sundberg said. “We made a commitment to finish out all the students that we had, but we didn’t take any new students.”
The adult education program is federal money which for whatever reason didn’t get included in the federal appropriations package several weeks ago.
And as I’ve already told subscribers, there’s a bipartisan bill designed to fix this particular problem. HB 4321 is backed by the governor, but hasn’t yet moved out of the House Rules Committee.
This situation is just ridiculous.
18 Comments
|
* The good news…
Thousands of people with mental illnesses have been barred from owning guns in Illinois in recent years under measures put in place amid a wave of deadly mass shootings across the country.
* The truly bad news…
But the Illinois State Police weren’t tracking whether they reported what [the mentally ill] did with their guns [after they were declared ineligible to own them] — a requirement under the law. The agency began to do so only weeks ago — after being asked by Sun-Times reporters why it wasn’t already doing that.
The laws also allowed for the seizure of those guns.
But that seldom happens, records show. The state police say local police are in a better position to do that. Local police, in turn, point the finger right back at them.
As a result — despite laws that have been called among the nation’s best at flagging people who shouldn’t be allowed to own guns because of mental illness — authorities say they don’t know how many of them remain armed. […]
“We can’t just go in to somebody’s house and take their guns” [said Hoffman Estates Sgt. Kasia Cawley]/
Actually, under the law, they can. The local police can seek a warrant to search the homes of people who haven’t reported the whereabouts of their guns after having their FOID cards revoked. They can then seize any guns they find.
Pardon the expression, but this is insane. Go read the whole thing.
* And I’m not saying that this incident is a direct consequence of police inaction, but it’s worth a look…
A 28-year-old woman apparently shot herself in the head late Sunday after she opened fire and critically wounded a father and daughter in a southwest suburban Bridgeview home, police said.
Neighbors called police at 11:32 p.m. when they saw a person dressed in black, carrying a gun and walking around the house in the 7200 block of South Roberts Road, according to Bridgeview Police Chief Walter Klimek. The person, who was thought to be a woman, then entered the house and the neighbors reported that they heard gunfire.
Officers responded to the home and looked through a window to see a person lying in a pool of blood in the kitchen, Klimek said. The 5th District SWAT unit, which is comprised of members from police departments from the 5th District Circuit Court area, was then called to the scene.
13 Comments
|
* Today’s is Faisal Khan’s last day as the city council’s inspector general. He’s going out with a bang…
FBI agents seized a trove of investigative documents, computers and files from legislative inspector general Faisal Khan’s office on Friday, its last day overseeing Chicago elected officials.
“We received a subpoena of the FBI to take custody of our files and our computers with the understanding [that] we are working with them on a number of investigations,” Khan told POLITICO on Sunday. “In order to protect the integrity of these cases, we had to take the extraordinary step to make sure they don’t end up in the wrong hands.”
Khan said some of the officials he investigated were “devoid of ethical morals and values.” […]
While trashed by aldermen, investigators were routinely meeting with the U.S. attorney’s office, the Department of Treasury and other federal entities, sources tell POLITICO. At least three cases that originated with the office have evolved into full-blown federal grand jury investigations, sources say. And at least three aldermen are undergoing scrutiny and have hired attorneys.
24 Comments
|
Your (now rare) “right to work” roundup
Monday, Nov 16, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Bernie…
In what struck me as an interesting use of advertising dollars, the Illinois Policy Institute recently ran radio ads in Springfield saying that Illinois should become a right-to-work state.
“In right-to-work states, workers decide for themselves whether to financially support a union,” states an ad playing recently on WTAX-AM 1240. “And union executives work for members, not the other way around.”
“Michigan and Indiana workers have seen their incomes rise faster than Illinoisans’ since their states enacted right to work,” the ad states, and there are many other statistics presented about great times in right-to-work states versus Illinois.
Why interesting? Well, even Republican Rauner wanted Illinois to go only to a system of right-to-work zones as he traveled the state extensively after taking office. And now he’s dropped that demand from his “turnaround agenda,” though other aspects of his plan, such as allowing local governments to decide whether they will bargain collectively with their employees, still would erode some union rights.
KRISTINA RASMUSSEN, executive vice president of the policy institute, said both Indiana and Michigan “have seen a manufacturing boom since going right-to-work,” with personal incomes increasing. “Meanwhile, Illinois has been losing factory jobs.”
Discuss.
36 Comments
|
Tables turned on Madigan
Monday, Nov 16, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…
“He seems so done with it all,” said one top Republican earlier last week about House Republican Leader Jim Durkin. “He hates this,” said a close Durkin pal not long afterward.
The overtime session’s constant battles with the House Democrats and super-strict marching orders from Governor Bruce Rauner were wearing Durkin down, said some folks who know him. “This summer was pretty nasty,” he admitted to reporters last week.
But that changed by Tuesday. Asked to describe the progress of the previous few days on a scale of one to 10, a cheery Durkin replied, “Eight, nine, 10.” He seemed back on his game.
Meanwhile, House Speaker Michael Madigan clearly had a very bad week.
Madigan, who has long been considered the most successful Democratic politician in Illinois history, had hoped to finally knock down Rauner’s solid GOP legislative wall on Tuesday and force House Republicans to defy their governor by voting to rescind Rauner’s slashing of the state’s child-care program and social services for the elderly and disabled.
But the rug was pulled out from under Madigan. With the approval of Democratic Senate President John Cullerton, some Democratic legislators cut a deal with the governor to restore funding to those programs in exchange for killing the legislation. Madigan’s bills went nowhere.
So instead of a defeated Durkin, we saw an angry Madigan. And while the speaker was obviously upset at one of his own members – Representative Ken Dunkin – for working with Rauner and killing the bills in the House by refusing to vote, Madigan was also said to be pretty steamed about a possible conspiracy involving Rauner, Cullerton, and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel.
A top Madigan ally pointed to the personal relationship between Rauner and Emanuel, the number of contributors to Emanuel’s campaign who also gave to Rauner’s, and the allegedly Democratic IllinoisGO PAC, which was founded earlier this year to promote “pro-growth” Democratic policies but looks to many like a Rauner front group.
The source also highlighted Emanuel’s ties to IllinoisGO’s top consultant, Greg Goldner of Resolute Consulting – whom Madigan called out by name during a press conference earlier this year for using the same rhetoric as Rauner in his PAC’s mailers targeting Madigan’s members. The Madigan people say the PAC is backing 15 candidates against House Democrats, although people who know better than I can find no actual evidence of this.
And it’s no secret that Emanuel lives in Cullerton’s district, and that the two men are close.
That’s a lot of paranoia for one day, but, man, were they ever upset.
The mayor’s people flatly denied that they had anything to do with Madigan being triangulated by Rauner and Cullerton. Yes, Emanuel canceled a scheduled city-council hearing on the funding crisis at the child-care program, which was designed to put even more pressure on Rauner. But that was done because Rauner had asked that they show a little good faith after Emanuel spent a solid week attacking the governor in the media.
As for Goldner, they said, he’s a Mayor Daley guy and isn’t really an Emanuel guy. “Greg has been out of favor with the mayor and his team for a long time,” insisted one longtime Emanuel insider last week.
And they insisted that there’s no way they’re involved with Democratic primaries against any of Madigan’s members. They know that Madigan would declare all-out war on them, and they ain’t suicidal.
And Cullerton was probably just doing what Cullerton always does; the man truly loves making deals.
Rauner had threatened to sit for two months on the bill to fix the child-care program if it was sent to his desk and then veto it in January, which would’ve undoubtedly put hundreds of smaller child-care providers out of business in the meantime. A deal with Cullerton’s blessing made sure those providers stayed afloat, and it was backed by the provider community.
The legislative bottom line is that Madigan has been thwarted at pretty much every turn by Rauner. The overtime session has succeeded at collapsing the governor’s poll numbers, but Madigan hasn’t been able to take advantage of that in his own chamber, with his own super-majority.
The one thing that Madigan hates above anything else is showing weakness. He most definitely didn’t look strong last week. He’s simply not accustomed to that. His next move should be fascinating.
25 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|