Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar

Tuesday, Jun 4, 2024 - Posted by Rich Miller

* We’re gonna give this a try to see if people find it useful…

The House almost went off the rails last week (Updated)

Tuesday, Jun 4, 2024 - Posted by Rich Miller

* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…

Illinois House Speaker Chris Welch gave added meaning to the phrase “winning ugly” during Wednesday’s early morning hours.

I’ve never seen anything like it, so let’s take a look.

House members were told to be in their seats by noon on Tuesday after the Senate had easily passed the entire budget package on Sunday.

But the House session was delayed for endless hours as rumors swirled about a “mini revolt” against the budget deal struck by Gov. J.B. Pritzker, Senate President Don Harmon and Welch. Some of the more fiscally moderate Democrats objected to the budget’s level of spending and particularly the revenue proposals, much of which they did not support as stand-alone proposals.

The House speaker has an unwritten rule that no bill can move forward without 60 House Democratic votes. But many of the revenue-enhancing proposals Welch agreed to with Pritzker and Harmon did not have that level of support. So some of the “mods” were quite grumpy.

The appropriations bill passed with 65 House Democratic votes, with seven Democrats voting against it. The budget implementation bill passed with a more narrow 62-vote margin with eight Democrats voting against it and two progressives taking a walk.

After a bill eliminating the grocery tax passed with 86 votes and three Democrats voting “No,” the time came for what turned out to be the main attraction: the revenue omnibus bill.

Democratic Rep. Fred Crespo, who had earlier voted for the spending bill, warned his colleagues about massive spending pressures next year. “We have a moral obligation to look after taxpayers,” Crespo said, telling members to “vote your conscience.” He voted against it.

At one point during the debate, the Republicans requested a verification of the roll call, meaning that all members who voted for the bill had to be in the chamber. That request clearly caught the super-majority by surprise. Several Democrats were against this bill, and the House Dems were missing five people, two of whom were members of Welch’s leadership team, and one of those, Rep. Aaron Ortiz, had skipped town without telling anyone. Plus, they had some political targets to protect from a potentially controversial tax hike vote.

“Well, it is 3:36 in the morning in the last week of May,” sponsoring Rep. Kelly Burke, D-Evergreen Park, who is retiring at the end of her term, said during her closing remarks after a grueling hour of debate. “And I gotta tell ya, I’m not gonna miss this.”

Little did she know.

Burke’s concurrence motion received 60 votes, with 12 House Democrats voting against it (including Crespo). That’s when everyone realized Ortiz had left town, so he was verified off the roll call, and the bill didn’t have enough votes to pass.

Over strenuous Republican objections, Rep. Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz, who had voted “no,” moved to reconsider the vote. That motion carried with 67 votes. (These parliamentary votes generally rely heavily on party unity.) The second try at a concurrence motion received 60 votes, but the Republicans played the old fake-out game and had one of their own, Rep. Randy Frese, vote “yes.”

Numerous sources said Democratic Rep. Larry Walsh was supposed to vote for the bill, but he apparently saw the total hit 60 on the big board and stayed at “no.”

Oops.

After much delay, Frese was verified off the roll call and the motion failed again. House rules barred any more motions. Two concurrence motions are the limit. The bill should’ve been dead. But the Democrats then decided to just go ahead and suspend their own rule. Republicans were incensed, but Gong-Gershowitz again moved to reconsider the vote, which passed 62-42. And then Walsh finally voted for the third concurrence motion and it passed 60-47, more than two hours after debate began at 4:30 in the morning.

House Republican Floor Leader Patrick Windhorst is probably the most even-keeled person in the House, but he let loose. “I think it should be clear to everyone in this state what this super-majority is willing to do to ram a tax increase down the throats of the citizens of Illinois at 4:30 in the morning,” Windhorst said, his voice eventually rising to a shout. “Three votes! Three votes!”

Give Welch credit for persistence. He was duty-bound to pass this package. Failure could’ve been catastrophic for him. But you really gotta wonder if he could’ve possibly mollified a few more of his members before he locked in that budget deal.

Speaker Welch has granted three interviews since the session ended, but he has yet to explain what really happened that night.

…Adding… I posted this on the blog last week, but it might’ve been buried…

State Representative Larry Walsh Jr (D-Elwood) has made the following statement regarding his votes on the budget bills that came before the Illinois House of Representatives on Wednesday.

“Last night was certainly not my preferred solution for moving Illinois forward, but with the full framework of the budget passed and faced with the immediate threat of the state returning to the Rauner years of unbalanced budgets and broken promises, I made the incredibly difficult choice to support Governor Pritzker’s revenue enhancements.

“While I have significant concerns about the path this budget sets us on, I could not in good conscience vote to jeopardize public safety, cause chaos for our public service providers, or allow uncertainty to derail the work my colleagues and I have done to rebuild Illinois’ fiscal house. The cost of inaction was simply too great to stand by and allow the budget to become unbalanced.

“Over the coming months I will be engaging with leadership in both chambers, the Governor, and the other members of my caucus that have legitimate concerns with how this budget was constructed to make it clear that we cannot allow a budget process like we saw early this morning to happen again.”

* Also, from Rep. Terra Costa Howard’s constituent newsletter…

Wow. It’s been less than 24 hours since I left Springfield, after a marathon final session that ended in the wee hours on Wednesday.

I’m going to have a LOT to say about this year’s budget process over the next couple of weeks, but I think I’ll wait until I’ve had a good night’s sleep before I tackle this crucial subject. Stay tuned!

She has not sent an update.

24 Comments

House Democratic staff union filing lawsuit against Speaker Welch (Updated x2)

Friday, May 31, 2024 - Posted by Isabel Miller

* Illinois Legislative Staff Association…

We are the Organizing Committee of the Illinois Legislative Staff Association.

Due to the failure of House Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch to deal with his staff in good faith, in spite of numerous good faith attempts on our part since November of 2022, we have come to the conclusion that any further attempts to resolve this dispute amicably would be a waste of time.

Speaker Welch says he was “proud” to stand with us back in October—while the cameras were rolling and the people were watching. Unfortunately, he was also too proud to sit down and work with us once his publicity stunt was over.

The Speaker’s press secretary says his record is clear, and it is—but that’s the whole problem. We are where we are today precisely because the Speaker’s record is clear. Since November of 2022, he and his aides have continually doubled down on obstruction, stonewalling, insincere engagement, political theater and gaslighting. The empty platitudes issued in response to our last release are, in our experience over the last 18 months, par for the course.

We are done waiting for Speaker Welch to take responsibility for the lack of action on the part of himself and his aides. We are done waiting for him to take the initiative to do what is best for his caucus and the people of Illinois. We are done waiting for something more than reluctant half-measures and poorly written messaging bills. Enough is enough.

The people of Illinois deserve a Speaker of the House who lives by his stated values, deals with others in good faith, and has the morals, courage and integrity to do the right thing. Our experiences over the last year and a half have forced us to question whether, in Speaker Welch, Illinois truly has that.

Therefore, we are filing suit to resolve this issue once and for all. As we indicated in our previous release, a legislative staff union has been formed and will negotiate on behalf of willing employees of the Illinois General Assembly. We will not be put off, ignored or gaslit any longer.

We have said that we intend to exercise our right to form a union and today’s action is the next step on that path.

* What plaintiffs are asking from the court…

A. Declare that, by the acts set forth above, the Defendant Speaker has deprived Plaintiff Burden, Plaintiff ILSA, and the individual members of the Plaintiff ILSA represented by Plaintiff ILSA here in an associational capacity of their constitutional rights to engage in collective bargaining, as guaranteed by Article 1, Section 25 of the Illinois Constitution, and in doing so the Defendant Speaker has failed to perform the lawful business of the State and acted beyond his lawful authority.

B. Grant such other relief including injunctive relief as may be appropriate against the Defendant Speaker in his individual capacity including but not limited to appointment of a mediator to confer with the parties and assist them in the process of collective bargaining and grant other injunctive relief to bar Defendant Speaker from any act to forestall bargaining with the purpose or intent of depriving them of the constitutional rights guaranteed by Section 25.

C. Grant such other relief as may be appropriate, including an order to Defendant Speaker to post or mail to members of the Defendant Speaker’s staff recognizing and assuring protection of their right under Section 25 of the Illinois Constitution to engage in collective bargaining without reprisal.

Thoughts?

…Adding… The filed version, which has some minor corrections, is here.

…Adding… From the WBEZ story…

Whether the bill moves again or not, Burden and other ILSA members want to use what they see as their constitutionally protected right to collectively bargain for wages and benefits.

“Come to the table, man. That’s all we’ve wanted,” he said. “Like, literally, for a year and a half, we’ve been asking you to sit down and talk to your staff. Come talk to us when it’s not a PR opportunity for you, when there aren’t cameras.”

35 Comments

Today’s quotable (Updated)

Friday, May 31, 2024 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Crain’s…

In an interview, [Senate President Don Harmon] said comments he made earlier this spring urging the two teams to work together were misread as a sign he would bless any deal they jointly pitch. “My overall observation would be that the two are fighting over the same pot of (subsidy) money that neither is entitled to,” Harmon said. “I have yet to hear a compelling argument as to why taxpayer money should be put into the hands of wealthy sports franchises.”

…Adding… As I pointed out in comments, this is not really a walkback. Some reporters simply read too much into what the teams claimed Harmon said. But he was pretty clear way back in February. From Crain’s…

State Senate President Don Harmon specifically has told both teams there is little appetite in the General Assembly to approve separate stadium legislation.

“I’m not planning to referee fights between billion-dollar sports franchises,” Harmon told Crain’s in a statement. “I hope the teams took heed of the governor’s expression of reluctance to use tax dollars to subsidize new stadiums.”

And here is the statement Harmon’s spokesperson gave me…

“I share the governor’s reluctance to spend taxpayer dollars to subsidize private stadiums. I’m not going to referee fights between billion-dollar sports franchises.”

He wasn’t directing them to work out a deal that would then be rubber-stamped.