* The Executive Ethics Commission today released a new batch of investigative reports issued by the state’s Executive Inspectors General. Click here. All but two of the 39 reports had to do with the federal Paycheck Protection Program, which was designed to help small businesses weather the international pandemic storm by lending them money to pay for payroll and operating costs. Many were eligible for loan forgiveness. 403 state employees have been dinged for violations since the OEIG began investigating the misuse of the program.
According to a search of the Ethics Commission’s website, 402 investigations into the PPP program have been reported so far.
…Adding… The commission says the actual number is 107, not 402.
* Excerpts from one such report…
The OEIG located public records from the SBA showing that Ms. Pickering received a PPP loan for a sole proprietorship for $20,829 in April 2021. The OEIG subpoenaed loan documents from the lender, which included a PPP “Borrower Application Form Revised March 18, 2021” signed in Ms. Pickering’s name and dated April 23, 2021. The “Self-employed individual” box was checked on the application, the Business Legal Name was “Michelle Pickering,” the year of establishment was listed as January 1, 2018, Ms. Pickering was identified as the sole employee, and the business was categorized under a code for “Taxi and Ridesharing Services.” The loan application contained various certifications, all reflecting the initials “MP,” which included a statement that the applicant “was in operation on February 15, 2020 and had employees for whom it paid salaries and payroll taxes or paid independent contractors”; a statement that the funds would be used as authorized by PPP rules; and a statement that information provided in the application and supporting documentation was “true and accurate in all material respects.”
The loan application listed the gross income amount for tax year 2020 as $99,980. That figure was used to calculate the loan amount of $20,829 (intended to cover a period up to 2.5 months). A 2020 Schedule C Profit or Loss From Business form for a “ride sharing, taxi, and limousne [sic] services” business with Ms. Pickering listed as the proprietor, which listed gross income of $99,980 and various expenses totaling $3,600, was submitted with the loan application. […]
The OEIG also obtained and reviewed the DHS personnel file for Ms. Pickering, which contained Reports of Secondary Employment submitted in 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The form submitted in 2019 reported that Ms. Pickering worked as a “caregiver” for a company called RAH outside her DHS work hours. None of the other forms documented that she had reported any secondary employment. […]
On August 30, 2023, the OEIG interviewed Michelle Pickering. Ms. Pickering said that since working at DHS she has not owned a business or had any secondary employment or any other forms of income outside of her State employment. […]
Ms. Pickering denied ever owning or operating any business and ever being self-employed. Ms. Pickering also claimed that she had not applied for any loans for any businesses. When shown the PPP loan application in her name during the interview, Ms. Pickering claimed that she had not seen it before and did not fill it out, but said it had been submitted by Individual A. Ms. Pickering claimed that while she was shopping at a grocery store she came across Individual A talking to another person about obtaining a loan to start a business. Ms. Pickering claimed that at that time she was thinking about starting her own business, and Individual A told her that Individual A could obtain funding for Ms. Pickering to start her own business.
Ms. Pickering said that she had never owned a taxi or ridesharing business. However, Ms. Pickering claimed that she considered opening a business by making deliveries for warehouses called DWR. Ms. Pickering said she has a [redacted] and can only drive for approximately 10 minutes at a time, so she would have someone else do the driving for her business. Ms. Pickering claimed she never provided Individual A with her business idea or possible business name. Ms. Pickering confirmed she only had an idea for starting a business and it was never in operation or earned any money.
Ms. Pickering confirmed she gave Individual A all her personal information while at the grocery store, including her State ID, Social Security Number (SSN), phone number, email address, and bank account information. Ms. Pickering claimed that she only had that one interaction at the grocery store with Individual A, and she never obtained any contact information for Individual A or ever met or spoke with Individual A again. […]
Ms. Pickering admitted that none of the information on the loan application and associated documents, aside from her personal information, was true and accurate, and that her receipt of the PPP loan funds was a violation of State ethics rules.
This third party claim is a common refrain in the reports.
* Conclusion…
Regardless of the ease of procuring these PPP funds, this was not free money for the taking. These loans, as with any other, required truthful information as a basis for approval. State employees are expected, at minimum, to maintain the public’s trust and confidence. Misappropriating such funds is far from being ethical, professional, acting with integrity, or conducting oneself in a manner that reflects favorably upon the State. Accordingly, the OEIG recommends that DHS terminate Michelle Pickering.
Pickering is not listed on the current state employee database.
* Some of these folks are being prosecuted. From a few days ago…
Attorney General Kwame Raoul announced today his office obtained a guilty plea in a case against a Chicago man who fraudulently received a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan totaling approximately $14,582 while employed by the Illinois State Police (ISP).
The Attorney General’s office prosecuted Ravonn Hankins, 34, who pleaded guilty to one count of theft, a Class 2 felony. Cook County Circuit Court Judge Mariano R. Reyna sentenced Hankins on Thursday to two years of second chance probation and 30 hours of community service. Hankins has also paid $14,582 in restitution.
20 Comments
|
* Homeschooling advocates were already at the Statehouse at 6:30 this morning…
ABATE and others are also in town today, so that crowd wasn’t completely homeschoolers.
* Some folks have pointed to problems in public schools with teachers being regularly busted for child sexual abuse as a reason why the state should get its own house in order before sticking its nose into homeschooling. But the bill’s sponsor, Rep. Terra Costa Howard (D-Glen Ellyn), had this response…
A comment that was made earlier about educator misconduct in our schools I found kind of interesting because those rules that we have in our schools for somebody who’s been convicted of a prohibitive offense, like a sex offense - those don’t apply to homeschool families.
So you guys are all okay that anybody who has that conviction, that’s okay for them to be homeschool parents. Talk about a level of protection that is missing on children. Again, that is a huge level of protection that is not on a child, none of those things that would prohibit an individual from being even in our school around kids, that doesn’t apply to homeschool families and homeschoolers, because there are zero protections here in the state of Illinois.
The bill passed committee with one Democrat, Rep. Fred Crespo, voting “Present” and all Republicans voting against it. It now goes to the floor, but has an uncertain future.
…Adding… House Republicans…
Illinois House Republican Leader Tony McCombie strongly opposed HB2827, a bill that adds unnecessary regulations on homeschooling families in Illinois. The legislation was presented today in the House Education Policy Committee and advanced to the House Floor for further consideration. Following the committee hearing, Leader McCombie issued the following statement:
“Today, the Democrat majority silenced over 35,000 advocates who oppose this misguided legislation—a blatant disservice to Illinois families that must not be ignored.”
“With the serious challenges facing our state, lawmakers should be addressing real problems, not creating solutions for issues that don’t exist. HB2827 is nothing more than a strategic push for more government control, doing nothing to tackle the true root issues plaguing public education.”
…Adding… ILGOP…
Today, ILGOP Chair Kathy Salvi released the following statement following the House Education Policy Committee’s passing of HB2827.
“Let’s be clear about what The Homeschool Act really is – a disgusting attempt by Illinois Democrats to take away parents’ rights to homeschool their children and insert the government into our day-to-day lives. Politicians in Springfield have no right to tell parents how to teach our children and the ILGOP and 40,000 families who filed witness slips will continue to fight tooth and nail to stop these draconian policies and attempts to diminish parental rights.”
* Related…
* What is HB2827? The bill that could change homeschooling rules across Illinois: The Homeschool Act, also known as HB2827, would create a set of requirements for homeschooled students and educators. It includes things like informing a child’s designated public school or district that they are being homeschooled, requiring any child taking part in school activities on or off school ground provide proof of immunizations and health examinations and setting requirements for the topics and content homeschool children learn.
* AFP-IL Launches Campaign Opposing Regulations on Homeschooling: Americans for Prosperity-Illinois (AFP-Illinois) is launching a statewide video campaign urging Illinoisans to contact their lawmakers and demand they reject HB2827, the Homeschool Act.
* Illinois parents, lawmakers sound alarm over proposed homeschooling bill: ‘Direct assault on families’: Some left-leaning politicians have also voiced concerns about HB2827. Illinois state representative La Shawn Ford, a Democrat, told local outlet The Center Square that he’s “not for it.” “From the constituents that I’ve gotten calls from, I’m understanding why they don’t like it,” Ford is quoted as saying. “The loss of their autonomy, that’s a major concern that they lose the autonomy over their children, which is why they choose homeschooling. They want to have control over their children’s education, including the curriculum, how they teach and the philosophy.”
47 Comments
|
* The Civic Federation, the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, the Illinois Economic Policy Institute and the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability have released a report calling for the expansion of the sales tax to some services…
As the State of Illinois’ second largest revenue source, the sales tax is a critical tool that supports government operations and public services throughout the state. First implemented in the 1930s, Illinois’ antiquated sales tax structure still primarily taxes goods rather than services. Due to this narrow tax base — which does not reflect the modern, service-oriented economy — the sales tax is falling short. Illinois needs a more strategic and sustainable fiscal structure that delivers consistent and reliable revenue growth, efficient spending, and economic competitiveness.
The time has come to fundamentally modernize the sales tax in Illinois to better reflect a 21st century economy. Applying the sales tax to consumer services would help secure Illinois’ financial future and its ability to meet residents’ needs by supporting critical public services, reducing tax inequities, and enhancing fiscal stability
* From the press release…
• Illinois’ sales tax structure is outdated. The current tax system primarily taxes goods, even though consumer spending has shifted significantly toward services over the past several decades. Illinois taxes only 29 out of 176 consumer services, far fewer than most neighboring states.
• Modernization would promote more tax fairness. High-income households spend five times more on untaxed services than low-income households, creating an unfair system. Illinois’ current system also gives preferential treatment to service-oriented business over retail firms. Expanding the tax base to include services would help correct this imbalance.
• New revenue would help support critical services. Expanding the sales tax to include consumer services could generate nearly $2 billion annually for the state, with additional funds flowing to local governments and public transit agencies.
* Exemptions and other items of concern…
▶ A service tax should be imposed on a broad set of consumer services to comply with the Illinois Constitution’s uniformity clause, which requires that taxes be consistently applied, with reasonable exemptions.
▶ Any economically efficient plan to tax consumer services should include two important exemptions to support the state’s households and businesses:
▷ Essential services like housing, healthcare, and childcare that are generally not classified as volitional consumption should be excluded from any tax on consumer services. Taxing these transactions could cause significant disruptions for households of all incomes and would be contrary to the state’s broader policy objectives.
▷ Services purchased by businesses as an input into products later offered for sale should also be excluded. These business-to-business (B2B) transactions, which include services like accounting and legal support, are considered intermediate inputs that help create products that will be taxed when sold to the final consumer. Taxing these transactions would lead to tax pyramiding — an economically inefficient approach that results in uneven and inconsistent effective tax rates. Taxing B2B services would also damage Illinois-based businesses’ ability to compete with peers in other states.
▶ To address existing taxes on services, the General Assembly should work with local governments to transition their existing service taxes (such as Chicago’s tax on streaming services) and avoid double-taxation by multiple units of government. The state can ensure local taxing jurisdictions, including communities with existing service taxes, benefit from sales tax modernization by guaranteeing that any expansion of the state sales tax base is fully reflected at the local level.
▶ As part of an expansion of the sales tax base, taxing jurisdictions should consider potential adjustments to their current rates, with the goal of maximizing revenue while decreasing overall tax burden on consumers.
* Where they’d like to see the new money go…
▷ Addressing the $770 million public transit funding deficit estimated by the RTA and total $1.5 billion needed annually to enable significant improvements to the transit system in northeastern Illinois;
▷ Paying down Illinois’ $144 billion in unfunded pension obligations;
▷ Fully funding the evidence-based K-12 education funding formula;
▷ Making additional contributions to the state’s rainy-day reserve fund; and
▷ Funding tax relief for low-income households by increasing resources allocated to programs like the Earned Income Tax Credit and Circuit Breaker Property Tax Relief program.
Before commenting, please click here and search the full report with any questions you may have.
Anyway, what are your thoughts on this?
…Adding… TFI…
Taxpayers’ Federation of Illinois President Maurice Scholten released today the following statement in response to a new report encouraging Illinois lawmakers expand state sales taxes to include more consumer services:
We appreciate the research teams for their recommendations and share their belief that funding education, mass transit, and public pension systems are vital to economic growth. Expanding Illinois’ historically narrow sales tax base could be one part of a long-term solution, but it is important to remember new sales tax revenues would take a significant amount of time before they are available to address these critical services.
In addition to ensuring their legislation would survive a constitutional challenge, lawmakers must work with local governments already relying on excise and service taxes to ensure these services are not subject to punishingly high tax rates. Moreover, all those affected by these changes must have sufficient time to prepare for such a seismic change to Illinois tax policy.
Illinois taxpayers deserve responsible sales tax policy - a modern system that treats goods and consumer services equally, thereby allowing lawmakers to lower the statewide sales tax rate to be more competitive with neighboring economies. We believe such a policy is within reach, and one that would help Illinois taxpayers realize a more sustainable future.
The report, “Modernizing Illinois’ Sales Tax: A pathway to a sustainable future,” was co-signed by the Civic Federation, the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability and the Illinois Economic Policy Institute. Although the Taxpayers’ Federation of Illinois did not co-sign the report, Scholten, an attorney who has spent the past 15 years impacting Illinois state and local tax policy, was consulted by its authors and provided feedback incorporated into the final product.
27 Comments
|
[The following is a paid advertisement and has been updated at the advertiser’s request.]
Advocates for senior care and nursing home frontline workers have been fighting for over 14 years to hold the nursing home industry in Illinois accountable for safe staffing levels.
Lawmakers established legal requirements for safe staffing levels, only to have nursing homes routinely ignore them. Then these legal limits were bolstered with enforcement measures—but the worst actors in the industry continue to staff at dangerously low levels. In fact, Illinois is worst in the country with the largest gap between care hours needed and care hours actually provided. Dead last among states.
And now after 14 years of time and again receiving warnings and incentives and second, third and tenth chances to staff at the legally required levels, the industry began accruing fines in January that are actually substantial enough to take the profit motive out of short staffing.
The industry’s response? HB 2292—designed to once again water down the existing fines and enforcement measures so they can continue to shortchange vulnerable seniors.
This is despite the over $3 billion that Illinois pays to nursing homes annually for resident care—including hundreds of millions of dollars specifically earmarked to bolster direct care staffing levels.
It’s time for lawmakers hold firm and let the nursing home industry know that in Illinois, care comes first—not nursing home profits.
Oppose HB 2292—because safe, dignified, accountable nursing home care can’t wait.
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|