* The House has approved the appropriations bill…
Democratic Reps. Kifowit and Walsh voted against the budget. Rep. Ammons is excused. Rep. Crespo, who was ejected from the House Democratic caucus, voted for it.
In case you somehow missed it, our end of session “cheat sheet” is here.
* Senate narrowly passes revenue bill (without the digital ad tax)…
According to Brenden, Democratic Sens. Belt, Glowiak Hilton, Halpin, Joyce, Loughran Cappel and Turner voted against it, and Sens. Fine, Lightford (excused) and Ellman didn’t vote.
* Senate narrowly passes the BIMP…
* Senate approves appropriations bill on final passage…
* House approves revenue omnibus on final passage…
* Senate passes transit bill that is doomed in the House…
* House approves BIMP on final passage…
* Senate passes bond authorization bill…
* House approves bond authorization bill on final passage…

6 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
*** UPDATE *** I told this to subscribers a bit ago: The Senate has introduced amendment 3 to the revenue bill (HB2755). The amendment deletes Article 92, the digital ad tax, and then removes it from the effective date section. So, if they adopt amendments 2 and 3, there will be no digital ad tax.
Adding: Senate Assignments has moved amendments 2 and 3 to the floor. The tax appears dead.
Adding: The Senate narrowly approved the revenue bill without the ad tax. It now moves to the House.
[ *** End Of Update *** ]
* As of late yesterday, the Democrats were saying that they’d dropped the idea of taxing digital ads on big corporations. But a slightly broader Digital Advertisement Tax Act is included in today’s omnibus revenue bill…
A tax is imposed on each person’s annual gross revenues that are derived from digital advertising services in the State if the person’s annual gross revenues derived from digital advertising in the State exceeds $125,000,000 [original proposal was $150 million]. […]
The rate of tax under this Act is 10% of the person’s assessable base.
There’s other language requiring companies that have at least $25 million in sales to file tax returns, but it doesn’t look like they have to pay anything.
Anyway, Mark Zuckerberg et al ain’t gonna be happy.
…Adding… The revenue estimate on the original digital ad tax was $725 million. So, if they’re estimating a billion dollars in increased revenue (as Sen. Elgie Sims said yesterday), it seems unlikely that this money is included, perhaps because a raft of lawsuits are expected.
…Adding… Ah, OK. A group of progressive Senators working with some House members apparently pushed for this tax. I’d heard earlier today that they were trying to bolster health spending.
…Adding… OK, things are more clear now. If you scroll down to the very end of the revenue bill, you’ll see effective dates. The digital ad tax (Article 92) doesn’t take effect until January 1, 2027.
* Here are a few other items. The dollar estimates come from House Revenue Committee Chair Curtis Tarver during this evening’s hearing…
* Tax amnesty program from October 1, 2025 through November 15, 2025. $195 million.
* Delays final payment from sales tax on motor fuel to Road Fund. $171 million.
* Sports wagering tax: The tax shall be $0.25 per wager for the first 20,000,000 annual combined Tier 1 and Tier 2 wagers. The tax shall be $0.50 per wager for each wager in excess of 20,000,000 annual combined Tier 1 and Tier 2 wagers. $36 million.
* Removes hotel exemption for short-term rental hosting platforms. $15 million.
* Adds nicotine analogs (click here) to the tax rolls, as well as “any form of the chemical nicotine,” except for smoking cessation products. Increase tobacco tax to 44 cents.
* “Joyce v. Finnegan” change, which is explained here: $72 million.
8 Comments
|
* Click here to read the new transit reform and funding proposal. The Senate sponsor, Ram Villivalam (D-Chicago) talked to reporters shortly before the language surfaced…
Summary of Villivalam’s remarks about funding…
* $1.5 billion in revenues and efficiencies
* $50 million fare increases
* $113 million in efficiencies
* Package/delivery tax, which they’re calling an “environmental impact fee” [groceries, medications will be exempt]
* Rideshare tax
…Adding… Regarding the delivery tax…
IRMA would like to clarify a key point regarding Amendment 3 to HB3438:
The amendment does not fully exempt groceries or medicine from the $1.50 delivery tax.
Under the Amendment (page 17), retail delivery is defined as “sale at retail of tangible personal property by a retailer for delivery by a motor vehicle owned or operated by the retailer or any other person to the purchaser to a location in this State, which includes at least one item of tangible personal property that is subject to the tax imposed under the Retailers’ Occupation Tax Act.”
The key phrase is “at least one item of tangible personal property,” as the majority of online orders (70 percent) contain a mix of groceries and personal items, or a mix of medicine and personal items. For example, if a consumer places a delivery order for groceries and adds just one personal item, such as a cleaning product, the entire delivery would be subject to the $1.50 tax. The same would apply if someone orders medicine but adds a package of diapers – the $1.50 tax would apply.
There’s lots more in the bill than what he talked about.
* Transcript…
REPORTER: So how much revenue does this plan generate?
VILLIVALAM: As you know, in the northeastern Illinois region, there’s a fiscal cliff of about $771 million. The CMAP, the Clean Jobs Coalition, the United We Move organized labor coalition, the Civic Federation, the Civic Committee, of the Commercial Club of Chicago have all stated very clearly that if we want that world class system, a system that keeps people safe, makes to be different point A to point B. That number and one that’s for the next three decades, not just for next year. That number is a $1.5 billion investment.
We’re looking at a package that raises not just that number [for] the Northeast Illinois region, but really it raises a significant amount of funding for downstate community as well. And so it is a package that has been described [by] a business leader as a shared sacrifice. There’s efficiencies. There’s existing revenue streams, like the Road Fund interest that’s being used for transit. There is, as I mentioned, an environmental impact fee based off of the model that Colorado and Minnesota have done to fund public transit. [Package and delivery tax]
Obviously, there’s a rideshare fee. Our rideshare companies provide a service to our communities. And we believe, though, that public transit is important, and by the way, they’re complimentary as well. PACE is a perfect example where they contract with Rideshare companies for people with disabilities.
And so there’s other items in the package. But again, business groups, labor groups, environmental groups, all have agreed that we need that transformational investment to see the world class public transit system that we’ve set out to do as part of this three year mission.
REPORTER: Senator, did the operational issues get in, get resolved? You know, there was talk that a lot of the money in the previous amendment, so there wasn’t enough money that would cover operational costs, and that, like the majority was for non-operational costs. [Click here for background.] How did this amendment that’s coming up improve that at all?
VILLIVALAM: So with this amendment, we’re able to accomplish the transformational investment that I believe the northeastern Illinois region needs to have a system for the next three decades, and not just for next year. And so yes, it is as a shared sacrifice, the RTA put forward $113 million in efficiencies, $50 million of that was fare increases. I’ve been clear from the beginning with them and the public, fare increases are not in efficiency. We put together using the model that’s been employed in Colorado and Minnesota, the environmental impact fee as a funding mechanism. Obviously there’s a ride share fee as well. We’re trying to make sure that it is a shared sacrifice and that it gets us to the number right that we need to see to get that transformational investment. […]
REPORTER: There’s already talk on that environmental impact fee having come back to address some of the issues. Exemptions for small business, for pharmaceuticals, for groceries, is it responsible to pass something now?
VILLIVALAM: Well, first, let me be clear, the groceries and medication. Groceries are already exempted. Medications are exempted through the language [garbled, but sounds like it’s coming]. I believe that we have a robust package of reforms. Let’s take a moment to talk about that. We’re talking about a four decade plus system with four different agencies, 21 appointing authorities, 47 different appointments. And as has been said by others, that meant everyone is accountable and nobody’s accountable. That was not acceptable. We’ve said that from the beginning, no funding without reform. And we also said we need to fully fund public transport. So what we’ve done is ensured that there is a new board, eliminating the RTA creating NITA . And that board will have representation in every region in northeastern […]
VILLIVALAM: There will be overlapping members to ensure that there’s that integrated mindset. The reality of the situation is CTA not just serves the city of Chicago. They serve suburbs of Cook County. Metra has a third of their spaces in the city of Chicago, a third in suburban cook and a third in the [collars]. PACE does 100% of paratransit for the entire region. We are one region in one state and that is the reform that we need to ensure that we have a system that our residents, again, people that work, the 1.5 million people that rely on public transport to get to their job, their school, their doctor, they cannot afford a 40% cut to service. We have 17,000 workers that work in public transit. If we don’t act today, 3000 of them will receive laid off notices into the summer and over the fall. That’s not acceptable. Working class families know that this is a responsible package of reforms and funding, and I think that’s why there’s broadbased support. And I look forward to getting done today. […]
VILLIVALAM: I would say the funding that has been put into the amendment received significant input from downstate transit agencies will provide them with additional funding, more than they initially requested. We know that it’s important to have a fully functioning, fully funded public transit system across our state, and not just because there’s community to community transit. But I’ve been hearing over and over from my colleagues about the importance of connectivity to the Chicago metropolitan region, from the Quad Cities, from Peoria, from Champaign. That is why we were able to secure additional funding for downstate transit agencies. And we also need to specify how that would help with the connectivity across the state. Thank you.
Please pardon all transcription errors.
A top union official said this afternoon that organized labor is “full speed ahead” on the plan.
…Adding… More revenue…
…Adding… Two letters sent to legislators against the proposed delivery tax. Faith leaders, Latino leaders.
…Adding… We’ve talked about this before, but here is some of the real estate transfer tax language…
The Authority shall impose a real estate transfer tax at a rate of up to $1.50 for each $500 of value or fraction thereof, which may be on the buyer or seller of real estate, or jointly and severally on both the buyer and the seller of real estate, for the sole purpose of providing financial assistance to the Authority as set forth in this Section.
(b) The real estate transfer tax under subsection (a) shall apply to real estate transactions that occur in Cook County outside of the City of Chicago, and within the Counties of DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will. […]
(e) The Authority shall allocate amounts received from Cook County under this Section as follows:
(1) 50% shall go to the Chicago Transit Authority to cover pension obligations, and any excess shall be used to fund transit operations; and
(2) 50% shall go to fund transit operations.
(f) The Authority shall allocate all amounts received from the Counties of DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will under this Section to the fund transit operations.
23 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
All hands on deck! (Updated x2)
Saturday, May 31, 2025 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Isabel and I both received this earlier today. Did you?…
* Regarding the delivery tax…
A coalition of business groups including the Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce, Illinois Chamber of Commerce, Illinois Fuel & Retail Association, Illinois Manufacturers’ Association, Illinois Restaurant Association, Illinois Retail Merchants Association, NFIB Illinois and TechNet, released the following statement urging lawmakers to reject a new $1.50 tax on retail and food deliveries:
“Amid persistent inflation, Illinois lawmakers are now considering a new delivery tax that would make it more expensive for consumers to have food, medicine and other goods delivered to their homes or businesses. This new, regressive tax will undermine consumer savings from the recent elimination of the grocery tax and would disproportionately impact communities that rely on delivery services to receive vital items. That includes residents who live in food deserts, people with mobility challenges and disabilities that make shopping trips challenging, or those without access to transportation. It also threatens income and opportunity for thousands of delivery drivers who may see demand for their services drop as consumers cut back to avoid this tax. We urge lawmakers to stand with working families and reject this tax.”
* Let’s move to a completely different topic…
Hi Rich, please find below a statement from Deb Robertson, a terminally ill Illinoisan for whom Senate Bill 1950, the End-of-Life-Options Act (also known as “Deb’s Law”) is named:
“As the Illinois General Assembly begins work on this final day of the 2025 Spring session, it is my fervent hope that the Illinois Senate will debate and take a final vote on Senate Bill 1950, the End-of-Life-Options Act (also known as “Deb’s Law”) before the adjournment later today. For me, for my family and for countless others across Illinois, this measure offers mercy and comfort in the wake of a terminal diagnosis. Although it is now unlikely that the law will be implemented for me to utilize, I urge state senators to reject the fear and overheated rhetoric of opponents of this measure and simply give mentally competent adults the ability to take a prescription to end their suffering and die peacefully.
“Eleven states and the District of Columbia debated and adopted medical aid in dying. Those debates were accompanied by the same claims and dire predictions we have heard from opponents of Deb’s Law. None of the list of horribles shouted by those in opposition in Springfield have come to pass.
“The advocates on the ground in Springfield tell me that there is a path to passage in the Senate. And, I understand that Governor Pritzker is prepared to sign the measure into law. My prayer today is that Senators will spare a moment today to think about those suffering today with a terminal diagnosis and approve Senate Bill 1950.”
Deb has been an outspoken advocate and has testified before legislators multiple times.
This post will likely be updated.
…Adding… Transit…
…Adding… On the Digital wager tax, which would tax a fraction of online sports betting…

13 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|