* Francia Garcia Hernandez at the Riverside-Brookfield Landmark…
State Rep. La Shawn K. Ford (8th) called on the Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board to reinstate Riverside police officer Zenna Ramos, who was decertified as a police officer by the state board in April. […]
Ford said the state board has taken the language of the state law known as Safe T Act as a reason to decertify Ramos after the village of Riverside requested the board waived basic training for the officer. Decertification means she can’t serve as a police officer anywhere in the state. […]
In 2008, Ramos was arrested for allegedly stealing three shirts, valued at a total of $14.99, from J.C. Penney at the North Riverside Park Mall. She was not a police officer then, but rather a 22-year-old single parent struggling with domestic violence-related issues who acted out of desperation.
“I take full responsibility for my actions,” Ramos said, standing next to Ford, near tears. “I did everything right to better myself for myself and my family so I could be a police officer.”
Ramos is a mother of three and her husband is a Cicero police officer.
* The Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board literally stretched the law’s intended reach in its general counsel’s letter to Riverside…
50 ILCS 705/6.1 provides that the Board must review law enforcement officers’ records to ensure no law enforcement officer is provided a waiver if they have been convicted of a felony or disqualifying misdemeanor. Among the listed disqualifying misdemeanors is theft (720 IL.CS 5/16-1). Interestingly, retail theft (730 ILCS 5/16-ag) is not specifically listed, however, P.A, 101-652 (effective July 1, 2021) added the following language to 6: “or any felony or misdemeanor in violation of federal law or the law of any state that is the equivalent of any of the offenses specified therein.” Retail theft is not only the equivalent of theft but is arguably an even more serious offense. Simple theft of property not from the person and not exceeding $500 in value is a Class A misdemeanor, whereas any retail theft of property valued in excess of $300 is a felony. Furthermore, where a literal reading of a statute would lead to inconvenient, unjust, or absurd results, the literal reading should yield. See Kelly vs. Village of Kenilworth, 156 N.E. gd 480 (I* Dist. 2019).
And yet, instead of yielding, the board’s chief lawyer Patrick Hahn went with the unjust and absurd result.
* More from the ILETSB’s denial letter…
Past behavior is a logical predictor of future behavior. In the 2000s Ramos appeared to have a propensity for stealing from stores. In addition to the 2008 retail theft conviction, Ramos was also placed on court supervision in 2003 for retail theft. There’s an old proverb that says, “the person who steals once is always thought a thief”, and while such thinking may be unfair, it is not uncommon particularity in light of today’s jury opinions of police. Ensuring the credibility of prosecution witnesses is a modern-day challenge, which requires the reputation of testifying officers to be above reproach. Maryland v. Brady, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) was the landmark case that established that the prosecution must turn over all evidence that might exonerate a criminal defendant. Brady has been expanded to include evidence that calls into question the credibility of testifying officers. Ramos’ prior retail thefts call her credibility and character into question, which can be exploited to a criminal defendant’s advantage.
That looks to my eyes like a classic example of concern trolling from a SAFE-T Act opponent.
…Adding… Excellent point in comments…
“the person who steals once is always thought a thief”
A SAFE-T Act opponent in a position of power within the Law Enforcement standards agency having this opinion is a wonderful advertisement for why the SAFE-T Act was necessary. Law enforcement and prosecution have deep-seated opposition to believing that anyone who commits a crime can rehabilitate in any way.
* From comments on an earlier post…
If a young person commits a petty crime, and then leads an honorable life, they deserve not only our forgiveness, but our appreciation. They become a role model for other young people who do stupid stuff.
Holding a petty theft committed at the age of 22 over the head of a 37 year old person who has lived an honorable life is ironically not petty. It is malicious and contrary to the whole concept of reform. Rather than being able to go out into the schools and streets and tell young people, “I know your struggle, I have been there, and I can tell you there is a better way,” it appears the ILETSB would prefer to not provide role models for troubled youth.
* ILETSB Chair Sean Smoot has set up a waiver review committee chaired by Illinois State Police Director Brendan Kelly to deal with over-reach by legal staff, etc. Maybe Kelly can straighten this out.
…Adding… Rep. Abdelnasser Rashid says he delivered this statement at last month’s Riverside village council meeting…
I stand with Ms. Ramos and the Village of Riverside in calling on the Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board to reverse its decision to decertify her. The charges against her were dismissed and vacated. She worked hard to turn her life around, to support her family, and to serve her community. I hope the IETSB promptly reviews its decision, and that the State’s Attorney’s Office removes her name from the Do Not Call list. This is simply the right thing to do.
*** UPDATE 1 *** The ILETSB’s website has a complete list of decertifiable offenses. Retail theft is not on it.
*** UPDATE 2 *** Gov. Pritzker…
