Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Monday’s edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
Saturday, Nov 6, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller
|
Reader comments closed until Tuesday
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * Barton and I are going to take a long weekend. Many thanks to Bill Brady for conceding today and letting us all get a much-needed break. I think I could sleep for three days. Before I go, I want to thank this blog’s readers and commenters for an enjoyable, crazy fun election season. But I want to particularly thank my subscribers for their continued support. Times are tough, and some of you can’t afford to renew, but most of you are hanging in there, as you’ve done for many a year. I can’t thank you enough, and I hope to continue improving every day. * Anyway, enough of this “I love you, man!” stuff. I need a nap. These guys are playing their first Chicago gig at the Double Door on Tuesday. Check them out…
|
*** UPDATED x1 *** Quinn victory press conference live-blog and video
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * ABC7 will broadcast it live. I’ll post the embedded video at 3:30, when the festivities are set to begin. * 3:27 pm - The feed is now hot, so here’s the embed. If you have any problems with ABC7’s feed, you can click here to watch WGN. * 3:33 pm - WGN just reported that the presser is running 10-20 minutes late. * While we’re waiting for the governor, House Republican Leader Tom Cross just issued a statement…
* 3:58 pm - Almost a half hour late. Four more years, campers. Oy. *** 3:59 pm *** And we’re starting… “We may have strong differences on policy issues, but we’re all Americans and Illinoisans.” Said being elected was a “tremendous privilege.” “We were often underestimated, but not by me.” Said he believes in grassroots politics. Education, he said, is the “key to opportunity for everyone.” “My job is to put Illinois to work.” Mentioned education again and said he wants to maintain integrity in government. Said those were his three top goals. He used Manny’s as a microcosm of Illinois. Diverse clientele where everybody seems to get along. “I could tell last week that there was a surge everywhere I went.” “The people call the shots, not the experts, not the pollsters and not the insiders.” “It’s never easy to concede. I’ve not won every election and when you don’t win it’s really hard.” Quinn said he will put together a veto session agenda for the “budget situation” and the “jobs situation.” Asks that legislators in both parties in both chambers “not be timid” on reform. Said he thinks AllKids will be in place “as long as I’m around.” “You know, when you’re down 13 points, nobody’s throwing rosebuds at you.” Best line of the day. Said he sees a tax increase as “revenue investments in people.” … “Investing in education pays great dividends.” Said the Hispanic vote was “very, very important… and really made a big difference.” “We have a lot of work to do in Illinois and I’m ready to do it.” * End. …Adding… Bill Brady’s concession letter to supporters is here. *** UPDATE *** Video…
|
A little mid-afternoon diversion - Pat Quinn busts a move
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * Simon Edelman was producing videos for Gov. Pat Quinn’s campaign in complete obscurity until the readers of this blog started taking notice in the early summer of 2009. His recent “Glee” video now has over 150,000 views. Our young man has grown up right before our eyes. Simon sent me this e-mail the other day and I got so busy that I forgot to post it…
* Simon’s note inspired me to make another Quinn mashup video. This one’s for Simon, Gov. Quinn and all the people who worked so hard to elect the governor. I figure they’ve earned it. Some of you may disagree with the sentiment expressed, but, hey, it’s over, man. It’s finally over. So get up and dance with Pat… Gimme the bridge now
|
Brady’s concession speech live blog - Raw video
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * You can click here to listen or watch the live video. * 1:29 pm - The video feed is now hot. * 1:30 pm - Two minute warning. Jason Plummer will speak first, followed by Sen. Bill Brady. * 1:32 pm - If you’re having trouble with the ABC7 feed, CBS2 also has a live feed. * 1:33 pm - Plummer vowed to work with the lt. governor and the governor any way he could. He choked up a bit when thanking his staff. * 1:34 pm - Brady is now speaking. “This election, this campaign for us was all about a path to bringing jobs” to the people of Illinois. “We thank the voters of Illinois, the millions of voters who were willing to listen to us.” “I just a few minutes ago got off the phone with Gov. Quinn, and I congratulated him on his victory, as he deserved.” Brady said he also offered to work with Gov. Quinn. Sen. Brady praised his wife Nancy, “who could not do a better job.” “Jason and I have truly been blessed” with their hard-working staff. “But it’s the people of Illinois that we truly are grateful to.” Brady said that after a “bitter election,” it was time to work together to make the state as great as it can be. * 1:40 pm - End of remarks. * 1:41 pm - He’s going to take questions from the media. Said the governor had invited him to Manny’s Deli to talk. Said the big GOP congresional wins show that the people want their leaders to work together in a bipartisan manner. Asked about his campaign strategy, he said he’d leave it to the pundits to decide whether it was the right one or not. He wouldn’t rule any further run out right now. “Life’s too short to rule anything out.” Mrs. Brady said something at the same time, but I didn’t catch it. Did anyone else hear what she said? * 1:44 pm - End of questions. Classy, reserved, firm, yet not defiant. A decent job by a decent man. * 2:12 pm - Sun-Times…
* 2:18 pm - Gov. Quinn is holding a 3:30 presser. I’ll look around for live audio/video. Help me if you can. I still have to finish my syndicated newspaper column. If you missed Brady’s speech, here is the raw video… * At the end, Brady is asked whether he might run again. “Third time’s a charm?” a reporter asked. Brady said that life’s too short to rule anything out. Mrs. Brady, however, shook her head, smiled and said what sounded like “We’re not going to entertain that right now.” I don’t blame her. That was a grueling campaign. Bill’s basically been running for governor for the past six years.
|
A look ahead
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * Gov. Pat Quinn loves him some Michael Sneed, and he gave her an exclusive interview for today’s paper…
From yesterday’s Sneed…
It wasn’t just Giannoulias, however. Quinn has been upset for months that legislative Democrats with anything close to a tough race refused to go anywhere near him. Considering how badly Quinn was beaten Downstate, that’s quite understandable. And while he won the Cook County suburbs, he was never anywhere near 50 percent, so he was seen as a needless drag. Legislative leaders prefer to position their candidates in isolation during years like this. But Quinn thought that meant they despised him. It wasn’t personal, it was just business. * For instance, Brady had some coattails in Decatur…
Flider wanted nothing to do with Quinn during the campaign. I can’t hardly blame him. * And check this out…
* Gov. Quinn won on a platform of moderate cuts, “strategic” borrowing and raising taxes. But a key component of that plan stalled again yesterday in the Senate…
* And lawmakers don’t appear to love any of the options…
* And the general feeling under the Statehouse dome yesterday was similar to this longtime subscriber’s, who wrote…
Yes, it is. Without a doubt.
|
Question of the day
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * I seem to be using him a lot today, but Zorn has posted a Pat Quinn quote…
Well, he did run on a tax increase platform during a tea party (TEA=Taxed Enough Already) year and won. That’s certainly something. Yet, he hardly scored a resounding win. * The Question: Does Gov. Quinn have a mandate? If not, explain. If so, to do what?
|
Brady will bow out at 1:30
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * I’ll see what I can do about finding some audio and video. WJBC Radio in Bloomington was a good source the other day. Check back at 1:30. * Pantagraph…
* Tribune…
* AP…
…Adding… ABC7 will carry it live. Thanks to a commenter for finding that one.
|
BRADY TO HOLD PRESSER AT 1:30
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller Posted by Barton Lorimor More gubernatorial drama…
|
Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller
|
Newspaper wants to abolish one person, one vote in Illinois
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * The Southern Illinoisan’s editorial board has lost its collective mind…
Yeah. OK. Let’s abandon “One person, one vote.” Right. That brilliant idea wouldn’t just meet “fierce resistance” from Chicago. Judges would laugh it out of court. Seriously, pot didn’t just secretly become legal in Illinois, did it? Because those editorial board members are obviously smoking some very wacky weed. * Empty acres don’t vote. Counties don’t vote. Townships don’t vote. Regions don’t vote. Citizens vote. Back in the “good old days,” southern Illinois politicians were able to stop redistricting for decades. The Chicago area’s population was exploding, but the people there had little influence in their state legislature. Apparently, the newspaper of record for that region would like to go back to those halcyon times. * Here’s a news flash for the undemocratic southerners: Mark Kirk is not from Chicago, but he won statewide. Judy Baar Topinka does not live in Chicago and neither does Dan Rutherford. Sheila Simon actually lives in Carbondale, where that bizarro newspaper is published. Bill Brady didn’t lose because he wasn’t from Chicago. Bill Brady lost because he failed to run a better campaign than Pat Quinn. Period. Brady was the frontrunner all year. He blew it. Plain and simple. Get over it, man. Back in 1994, Downstater Jim Edgar actually won Cook County. George Ryan was from Kankakee, where I was born. Last time I checked, Kankakee is not a Chicago ward. Obviously, it can be done. Brady just didn’t pull it off. * And it wasn’t just Chicago votes that elected Pat Quinn. Almost half a million Downstaters voted for him. Should they be disenfranchised too? Why should the 2,104 voters in Hardin County have more say in their state government than the 1,373,020 human being voters who happen to live in Cook County? What makes those Hardin voters so all-fired special and superior? The Southern Illinoisan is based in Jackson County. 15,617 people voted for governor in Jackson. But 23,594 people voted in Chicago’s 19th Ward. Yet, for some reason Jackson County votes should count for more than Beverly/Morgan Park’s? * Look, you backed a candidate who didn’t win. But that doesn’t mean it’s time for radical, unconstitutional “solutions.” That’s some very dangerous thinking. Several years ago, I asked the good folks who run the Legislative Research Unit if they had any data on which counties were the biggest state tax eaters and which were the biggest state revenue generators. I was told that the LRU has long refused to do that study because it is just too controversial. The last time they did it, they discovered that Downstate was a net revenue eater, the suburbs were a net revenue contributor and Chicago was revenue neutral. The results caused such an uproar that they won’t even touch the subject now. The fact that Downstaters eat more than their share of state money doesn’t give them the right to have more than one vote per person. * Newspaper editorial boards are supposed to be the guardians of public discourse. They’re supposed to take the time to think things through, calm the darker influences on our souls and advocate for rational, reasonable solutions. None of that was present in the SI’s ridiculous editorial. I really thought the Tribune was horrid, but there’s just no comparison here.
|
A note to commenters
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * Usually, I have to use the front page to warn commenters before an election to calm down. I didn’t have to do that this year. I intervened in the comments section on occasion, but it never got to the point where I felt the need to issue an above the fold banishment warning. Yesterday afternoon, however, while I was working at the Statehouse and unable to keep an eye on the blog, things got way outta hand in comments. * I completely understand how Bill Brady’s supporters feel right now. You thought you had it. You didn’t. And now the other side doesn’t want to even give you time to make sure all the votes are counted. That’s just horribly depressing. I can see why you’re upset, even angry. And I think I understand how the Quinn supporters are feeling. You had Rodney Freaking Dangerfield himself as your candidate, but by gosh he won. And now the guy he beat won’t admit defeat and exit the stage like a proper gentleman. Combine those two and you’ve got quite the combustible mix. * But here’s the thing. I won’t tolerate any more of this. I issued a lifetime banishment last night and I’ll do more today if need be, so start treating each other with respect and take off your tinfoil hats or you’re going to find yourself forever banned from commenting here. And you can bet your house that I’m just itching to zap my first moron today. Don’t tempt me. Try to understand what the other side is going through. It’s not really all that difficult. Both parties won something unexpected Tuesday, both parties also lost. * Please use the comment section on this post to say something nice about the other side today. You’ll be surprised at how much better you’ll feel. Politics is a rough business, and, yes, we do play rough here. But we don’t need to get dirty and be mean to each other. So, electronically shake hands and let’s move along. We’re better than yesterday.
|
Who was the best pollster? Nobody
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * How did the pollsters do on the Illinois governor’s race? I don’t think it’s ever been this bad. Nobody’s average even came close. From RCP via Zorn. Click the pic for a larger image… ![]() * October polling. Again, click the pic for a better view… ![]() PPP should’ve stopped in mid October when it was ahead. * Rasmussen was also way off nationwide. From FiveThirtyEight, also via Zorn…
* But FiveThirtyEight’s famed computer model didn’t exactly work like a charm, either… ![]() Thoughts?
|
Chicago will count 11,777 absentees Friday
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller [Bumped up from Thursday evening for visibility.] * From the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners…
Quinn’s lead stands at 19,413, but apparently, that’ll be rising once Chicago finishes counting. Other counties are still processing as well, but that’s a huge number of city absentees. * From ABC7…
And, keep in mind that most of those provisionals probably won’t even be counted. Cook County Clerk David Orr said yesterday that the county usually approves only about a quarter of the provisional ballots. This is why there’s just no chance for Brady. …Adding… About 37,000 of those 50,000 total uncounted absentees and provisionals are in Chicago and Cook County alone. …Adding More… Quinn won Chicago with 75 percent of the vote. Figuring that the city’s 11,777 absentees will break out about the same (it’ll probably be higher for Quinn, considering pre-election polling, but let’s just figure it that way), that’s 8,832 absentee votes for Quinn. If a quarter of the city’s provisionals are counted, that’s 2,062 more votes for Quinn, for a total of 10,894 votes. Using the same math for suburban Cook, which Quinn won with 53 percent, Quinn would pick up 6,042 votes. City and Cook combined total 14,874 Quinn votes. Using that same figuring, Brady’s total for both Chicago and Cook would be 6,742. Add the difference of those two numbers to Quinn’s current margin over Brady and you get a Quinn lead of 27,545, with just 13,000 votes left to count, assuming they are all countable, and they’re not. This thing is over. The AP is right.
|
Cullerton holds pension borrowing until veto session
Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller Posted by Barton Lorimor While we’re tracking the AP’s decision to call the gubernatorial election for Gov. Quinn, Senate President John Cullerton has decided not to call the pension borrowing bill until the veto session…
More from Lee…
…Adding…
|
*** UPDATED 4x *** THIS JUST IN….AP ANALYSIS FINDS BRADY CANNOT WIN; BRADY WON’T CONCEDE
Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller Posted by Barton Lorimor From the AP…
*** UPDATE 1x (4:23 p.m.) ***
It looks like Quinn has a half-percentage point lead on Brady, according to the AP’s figures. *** UPDATE 2x (4:55 p.m.) *** More from the AP…
…Adding…
*** UPDATED 3x (5:02 p.m.) *** *** UPDATED 4x (5:18 p.m.) *** Also, the absentee vote count in Jackson County turned it over to Brady this morning by 23 votes. That means Quinn’s county victories included Cook, St. Clair and Alexander.
|
Clueless
Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * If Melissa Bean’s election results don’t show the rank stupidity of her campaign and the DCCC, then I don’t know what does. Even if she somehow manages to overcome her 553-vote deficit - and that’s doubtful - this never should’ve been close. Joe Walsh had tons of people in the field, marching in parades, knocking on doors. Bean didn’t. Bean made some bad votes for her district (health insurance, stimulus, etc.). She had always run as a conservative to moderate Democrat, but then she changed. Unfortunately for Bean, her district didn’t. * Bean also didn’t realize until it way was too late that she was in trouble, and she quickly tried to flood the airwaves with negative ads. By then, everybody else was already on the air with their ads. She was drowned out. And what did the DCCC do? Nothing. They could’ve weighed in late, but they didn’t. They probably thought she had it in the bag and was just being a typical whiner incumbent who always thinks she’s in trouble. Bean won her first two races with 52 and 51 percent, respectively. She behaved like a moderate in Congress. Then she clobbered her GOP opponent two years ago, so maybe she and the DCCC figured she was unbeatable and Bean could do whatever she wanted. But 2008 was a Democratic landslide, especially here in Illinois. This time, Illinoisans were clearly furious with the Democratic Congress, and they made those feeilings known. Just ask Phil Hare, Debbie Halvorson, Bill Foster, Dan Seals and Alexi Giannoulias. Bean apparently believed her own hype and thought she could sit on what she thought was her lead. Wave rules didn’t apply to her. And her campaign was clearly convinced that Joe Walsh’s numerous personal problems disqualified him in voters’ minds. Wrongo. * And then there was this…
Third party candidates aren’t viable in Illinois, but as Bill Brady found out the hard way, they can still do you in. Bean’s campaign and the DCCC’s non-involvement was a screwup from beginning to end. And the third party angle was just one of the bigger reasons behind it. * If anything, I now have a bit more respect for the We Ask America polling firm. While they didn’t get the final point spread right, they did have Walsh leading Bean in their last survey, and they showed the Green Party candidate getting over 5 percent. He ended up with 3, but that’s well within the margin of error. They were also the only public pollster to predict that Bob Dold would beat Dan Seals. They got the spread way wrong, but the end result was the same. They also had Hultgren over Foster. * Related…
|
Question of the day
Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * The setup…
* The AP’s latest count has Quinn ahead of Brady by 19,514 votes. That’s down 47 votes from last night. * The Question: Should Brady concede today, or should he wait until the absentee votes are counted tomorrow, or should he wait a month until the ballot is certified? Explain.
|
The ground game and Democratic and union turnout
Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * From the Democrats’ coordinated campaign…
There are a lot of Democrats in this state, and when they vote (and they almost always do) they make a big difference. From the exit polling… ![]() That’s a two-point drop in Democratic representation from 2006, and that led to some problems everywhere. But it could’ve been much worse. The ground game certainly helped keep this from being a total, complete Democratic disaster. Illinois election day voters also had a far higher opinion of the Democratic Party than they did the Republican Party… ![]() A 58 percent unfavorable for the GOP? Not great branding. And considering the beating the Democratic Party has taken in the media here, a 51 percent favorable is downright astounding. The result is also another indication that the Democratic Party did a better job of getting its people to the polls. And while David Miller probably didn’t have a chance against Topinka, the numbers suggest that he and Robin Kelly could’ve benefited from some coordinated campaign and/or state party help…
It would’ve also helped if Miller and Kelly had put together better campaigns on their own, of course. Nothing attracts campaign assistance like success. * And don’t forget the unions…
Quinn didn’t win a super-gigantic percentage of the union household vote, but it was enough… ![]() Unfortunately for the Democrats, however, union households are dropping. 32 percent told exit pollsters they lived in a union household four years ago. Still, if it wasn’t for that money the unions spent and the effort they put into the campaign, it would’ve been a much worse day for the Democrats. * Election day voters seemed more liberal than recent polls have suggested. For instance, every poll taken before the election had pluralities or even majorities of likely Illinois voters favoring repeal of the federal health care legislation. Not on election day… ![]() * Related…
|
Suburbs, ideology and third partiers cost Brady dearly
Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * I am hearing this myself a lot these days from Republicans…
Personal PAC did a whole lot of mail, as did other groups. Gov. Pat Quinn doesn’t believe in direct mail, so they had to pick up the slack. * So, is this true? Well, Brady vastly outperformed Judy Baar Topinka’s 2006 numbers in the collars, but he underperformed Mark Kirk’s percentages… ![]() Kirk also did much better than Brady in suburban Cook County…
Kirk received almost 14,000 more votes than Brady in Chicago as well. * The fact that Kirk outperformed Brady in the suburbs and in the city is no huge surprise, since Kirk is a suburban moderate. But Brady’s campaign made the fatal error of thinking they could make up the difference Downstate. Check out these Downstate totals…
Brady simply did not concentrate enough time and effort on the suburbs. He was also never able to assuage suburban women that he wasn’t a wingnut, as Peter Fitzgerald was able to do in 1998. Brady wouldn’t send a moderate message and it cost him dearly…
* And for all you conservative folks who thought that Kirk wouldn’t play well Downstate, well, now you know how wrong you are. Brady only received 7 more votes than Kirk in his home county of McLean. And his margin over Quinn was 259 votes less than Kirk’s margin over Giannoulias. Why? Third party and independent candidates. Scott Lee Cohen spent big bucks and got 4 percent of the vote statewide. The other two third partiers received another 4 percent, for a total of 8 percent for the gubernatorial also-rans. In the US Senate race, the third party candidates received just 5 percent of the vote. That 3 percent was crucial. And it was more prominent in Chicago and the Cook suburbs, where third party and independent gubernatorial candidates received 8 percent while third party US Senate candiates received just 4 percent. The Brady campaign could never figure out how to deal with Cohen, and his 4 percent really hurt them in that close race. What happened was that some people who couldn’t stand to vote for Quinn took a look at Brady and decided they couldn’t be with him, either, so they went with Cohen. I’m not really sure what they could’ve done, but they didn’t do anything and that was yet another major mistake. * Now, there were other factors in this. Chicago’s turnout, for example. The superior Democratic ground game. Bigtime union involvement for Quinn. Etc. But Brady’s over-reliance on Downstate to carry the day and his refusal to spend more time and energy portraying himself as a moderate in the suburbs are both his fault. He couldn’t control the Democrats’ game. He could control his own. …Adding… These exit poll results pretty much say it all… ![]() Look at the difference in the female vote between the two candidates and the difference in how both genders voted for third party candidates. Brady was hurt both ways. * Related…
|
Morning Shorts
Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * Creditors sue over Tribune deal, allege fraud in Zell’s buyout: A committee representing Tribune’s unsecured creditors filed two complaints targeting Tribune Chairman Sam Zell, the real estate mogul who engineered the buyout; other Tribune board members; former CEO Dennis FitzSimons and other former executives, accusing them of shirking their duties so they could line their own pockets. “This L.B.O. transaction is among the worst in American corporate history,” the complaint said, according to Reuters… The buyout was “tainted from start to finish,” one of the complaints contends. * Tony Rezko, ex-Blagojevich fundraiser, has status hearing * Fast harvest, but conditions dry statewide * DuPage prosecutor Joe Birkett named appellate judge * DuPage’s Birkett appointed to appellate court * Birkett appointed to Appellate Court * 4 Cook judges deemed unqualified by bar are retained by voters * Schools boss Huberman exiting early
* Chicago schools chief to leave post this month * Chicago Public Schools chief Huberman leaving end of Nov. * Huberman to leave Chicago Public Schools * Sun-Times: Huberman picks bad time to resign, but … * Civic Federation warns of hazards in Daley budget
* Police Supt. Weis revises minimum age restriction plan * Aldermen propose banning alcohol-caffeine drinks * Ban of caffeinated alcoholic drinks is on the table * Burke: Charge charities $10 per day to solicit donations on public way * Stroger still deciding if he will fight Oglesby’s unemployment claim * Stroger refuses to answer question onfinalists for watchdog post * Cabrera new City Colleges board chairman * Blue Island mayor on vote: ‘We got killed’ * Elgin officials get first look at 2011 budget * Buffalo Grove village president apologizes for mocking recalled trustee * Village president sorry for mocking opponent in a wig * Judge OKs case against Harvey mayor, detective * City, Naperville council struggle with wards decision * Geneva attorney is nominee for Kane state’s attorney * Perez claims Kane County Sheriff seat * Jockeying begins for Lake County Board chairmanship * Trail projects get $5M in funds * Antioch to see grant for new pool * Carpentersville OK’s Firearms School * Naperville eyes $10 mil tax rebate for hotel project * Nine communities express interest in FutureGen CO2 disposal site * R.I. Republicans: ‘This party is not dead in Rock Island County’ * 2 laid-off East Moline officers get their jobs back * Sangamon Co. voters reject sales tax hike for schools * Decatur Township votes to raise its tax levy 4.95 percent to collect additional $75,000 * Education sales tax squeaks to win * 183rd firefighters to be laid off next year * SIU Announces Closure Days * Fioretti: Cancer like getting ‘hit by train’ * Meeks to tour Southwest Side schools
|
Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller
|
Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller
|
The precincts are all in and Quinn leads by 19,561 votes
Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * With 11,209 of 11,209 precincts reporting, Gov. Pat Quinn leads Bill Brady by 19,561 votes. They still have to count absentees and provisionals. There may yet be some adjustments in precinct counts. But that’s a big margin to overcome. * Mark Brown…
|
« NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |