Daley react
Monday, Sep 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a press release…
Quinn Campaign’s Statement on Bill Daley’s Decision
CHICAGO - The Quinn for Illinois Campaign released the following statement on Bill Daley’s decision not to run in the 2014 primary election:
“We respect Bill Daley’s decision. A divisive primary would have only helped Republicans who want to take this state backwards and undo the important progress we have made.
“When Governor Pat Quinn took the oath of office, Illinois faced a triple crisis due to decades of corruption, fiscal mismanagement and the worst recession since the Great Depression.
“Under the Governor’s leadership, Illinois is making a comeback.
“From restoring integrity to state government with strong new ethics laws to working with our auto manufacturers to create thousands of new Illinois jobs, all the while making many hard but necessary decisions to balance the budget, Governor Quinn has never stopped fighting for working families.
“We have more work to do.
“The Governor will continue fighting for taxpayers to enact a comprehensive pension reform solution that will strengthen Illinois’ economic competitiveness.
“And when the time comes for voters to make their decision on Nov. 4 next year, we are confident they will recognize the difficult and important work the Governor has accomplished on their behalf.”
* From a press release…
Bruce Rauner Statement on Bill Daley Dropping Out of Governor’s Race
Republican candidate for governor Bruce Rauner issued the following statement in response to Democrat Bill Daley dropping out of the governor’s race:
“Pat Quinn is a master of machine politics, but that approach to governing has failed the people of Illinois. I’m the only candidate able to offer a clean break from the failed policies coming out of Springfield, and I can’t be bought by the government union bosses and special interests running the state. I can’t be intimidated, and I won’t back down until we bring back Illinois.”
17 Comments
|
Daley drops out
Monday, Sep 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Tribune…
“One of the things I always thought in my career that I wanted to do, I thought I would be able to have that opportunity, I hoped, would be to run for office. And even though you’re around it for a long time, you really don’t get a sense of the enormity of it until you get into it,” Daley told the Tribune.
“But the last six weeks or so have been really tough on me, struggling with this. Is this really me? Is this really what I want to spend my next five to nine years doing? And is this the best thing for me to do at this stage of my life?” he said. […]
“There’s no doubt in my mind that Pat Quinn will not be the next governor of Illinois,” said Daley. “This governor is not that strong that somebody should fear running against him.”
100 Comments
|
All those years ago
Monday, Sep 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Fifty years ago the Beatles took a vacation before starting an American tour. John Lennon went to Paris. Ringo Starr and Paul McCartney headed to Greece. And George Harrison went to Benton, IL to visit his sister…
Illinois State Historical Society executive director William Furry says Harrison’s obscurity allowed him to walk Benton’s streets, jam with local musicians, visit record stores and even camp in the Shawnee National Forest without being hassled by fans. Harrison also bought a guitar in Mount Vernon and sang “Happy Birthday” at a bocce ball club in Benton.
A radio station in nearby West Frankfort played many of the Beatles’ first recordings, and Harrison was interviewed by a local teenager in what has been said to be the first American question-and-answer session with a Beatle.
* Check this out…
Louise Harrison wanted to promote The Beatles’ music with local radio stations.
She had previously been sent a copy of “From Me to You,” that she took to the WFRX-AM radio station in West Frankfort. Disc jockey Marcia Raubach played the song over the airwaves for the first time in the U.S. in June 1963.
When George Harrison visited his sister, the two hitchhiked to the West Frankfort radio station with a copy of “She Loves You,” which had been released the previous month in the United Kingdom. The single was also played by the station.
Can you imagine a Beatle hitchhiking in southern Illinois to promote a single?
Wow.
* Marilyn Lewis Dickey interviewed Harrison back then for her high school newspaper…
I was editor of the BCHS newspaper, The Echo, during my senior year. My sister Jean had also been an Echo editor.
Louise Caldwell called me and asked if I would like to interview her brother, George Harrison, who was on “Holiday” from England.
She said he was in “a band.” Little did I know what that band was to become.
This was in the fall of 1963 before the Beatles were on Ed Sullivan in the spring. This “band” was not known in the States just yet.
I remember meeting Louise and her brother, George Harrison, on the front porch of the house. My first reaction was that I thought it strange that he had on socks with his sandals.
My next reaction was that his hair seemed long for the style at the time.
We went into the house and I asked him questions about his band and his impressions of the United States.
I don’t remember any of these answers! He then played a 45 rpm record of the band’s latest songs that were popular in England. Those songs were “She Loves Me” and “I Want to Hold your Hand”
You can find lots more details about his visit by clicking here.
* There was also a documentary made about his visit…
* From a press release…
Governor Pat Quinn has proclaimed Sept. 21 as “George Harrison Day” in Illinois to commemorate the late musical star’s two-week stay in southern Illinois 50 years ago, when The Beatles were poised to conquer pop culture and music history. Governor Quinn also urged citizens to attend the Sept. 21 historical marker dedication in Benton that will unveil a permanent reminder of Harrison’s southern Illinois activities as “The First Beatle in America.” Today’s announcement is part of Governor Quinn’s commitment to promote heritage tourism in Illinois.
“Many icons through history have Illinois connections, and we are recognizing one more with this proclamation,” Governor Quinn said. “George Harrison helped define a generation, and we encourage visitors to follow his footsteps throughout southern Illinois.”
The historical marker dedication, hosted by the Franklin County Historic Preservation Society and the Illinois State Historical Society, will be held in Benton’s Capitol Park on Saturday, Sept. 21 at 2 p.m. The event is free and open to the public. The marker will describe the regional exploits of a young British musician just months before he and his partners exploded into worldwide fame that is as strong today as it was in 1963.
25 Comments
|
Daley’s retort
Monday, Sep 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a press release announcing the Illinois Democratic County Chairmen’s Association’s endorsement of Gov. Pat Quinn over the weekend…
“Four years ago the Illinois Democratic County Chairman’s Association remained neutral in the primary race for Governor. Now our Association enthusiastically and overwhelmingly endorses and supports Pat Quinn for election in the 2014 primary and general elections,” Pirtle continued.
County chairmen voted overwhelmingly to support the Governor. Chairmen from 79 of Illinois’ 102 counties voted in favor of Governor Quinn, who inherited a triple crisis caused by decades of corruption and fiscal mismanagement and the worst recession since the Great Depression.
Governor Quinn’s record includes enacting the largest capital construction program in state history supporting more than 400,000 jobs; the largest increase in health insurance coverage for people; and his work to help families who are facing foreclosure stay in their homes.
By contrast, millionaire bankers including Bill Daley - who served as Chairman of the Midwest Region for JPMorgan Chase from 2004-2010 and Head of Corporate Social Responsibility from 2007-2010 - helped create the recession.
Today’s latest win for Governor Quinn’s re-election bid served as the second recent failure for Mr. Daley. Mr. Daley tried but failed miserably to secure the endorsement of the Cook County Democratic Party, which overwhelmingly voted to support the Governor.
* Daley said he was “offended” by the governor’s jabs…
“If I’m so bad about the Democratic values, I mean, you tell me why President Obama offered me the chief of staff or why Bill Clinton put me in his Cabinet,” Daley said in an appearance on WGN-AM 720.
“I take second place to no one who stands up for the Democratic values on behalf of the people that are working in this state — no one. Not Pat Quinn or anybody else,” he said. “And I just am offended by his sort of trying to get the ball on me and try to avoid the responsibility which he has.”
Offended or not, as I’ve told you before the polling shows the attack works…
“Would you be more likely or less likely to vote for a Democratic gubernatorial candidate who ran a major bank that received federal bailout money, foreclosed on large numbers of Illinois homeowners, and engaged in predatory subprime mortgage lending?” voters were asked.
Unsurprisingly, that question moved the needle in a big way. According to the poll, a whopping 73 percent of Democrats were less likely to vote for the candidate.
Daley is gonna need a better comeback.
62 Comments
|
Question of the day
Monday, Sep 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Treasurer Dan Rutherford with his new running mate Steve Kim…
* The Question: Caption?
Also, bonus points for anyone who can explain to me two things: 1) What does Kim really bring to the ticket?; and 2) How is Kim the best person qualified to take over the governor’s job if, God forbid, something happens to Rutherford?
79 Comments
|
Charlie nails it
Monday, Sep 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From Charlie Wheeler’s latest Illinois Issues column…
After watching Illinois government and politics for more than 40 years, one might reasonably assume that he or she has seen it all.
One — or at least this one — would be wrong. […]
On the other hand, the amazement was understandable to find out that Ty Fahner, president of the Civic Committee of the Commercial Club of Chicago, was claiming that he and his cohorts had been urging Wall Street agencies to downgrade the state’s credit ratings as a way to pressure lawmakers to slash pension benefits for current and retired public employees.
The story was broken in late July by Rich Miller on his capitolfax.com blog site, a must-read for anyone interested in what’s happening in state government and politics. Miller posted an Illinois Channel video of a Union League Club luncheon last March, at which Fahner said he and some of his Civic Committee colleagues contacted the rating agencies, saying, “How in the hell can you guys do this [maintain the state’s existing credit rating]? You are an enabler to let the state continue.”
Miller’s report drew calls for investigation from We Are One Illinois, a labor coalition working to protect public employee pensions but was ignored by virtually all the major media, save Illinois Public Radio.
Two weeks later, Fahner emailed Miller to say that he “misspoke,” and that no one connected with the Civic Committee had contacted the ratings agencies. […]
What morphed the story from simply “amazing” at what the super-rich might do to protect or enhance their fortunes to the higher level of “unbelievable,” though, is the fact that Fahner also is a current partner and former chairman of Mayer Brown, the Chicago law firm that two years ago won a lucrative contract to serve as the state’s bond counsel.
So in essence, a partner of the law firm advising Illinois on its borrowing — for which it’s already been paid more than $1 million in fees and expenses — was simultaneously stabbing the state in the back by trying to crash its credit rating.
Breath-taking perfidy, even for Illinois, but also a good reminder that one should never, ever say, “Now I’ve seen it all!”
Charlie was also on the latest edition of Illinois Public Radio’s “State Week” and chastised reporters for focusing on the “Statehouse doors” controversy and completely ignoring the Fahner story.
28 Comments
|
Prison brunches to save money, time
Monday, Sep 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Some state prisons are now serving two meals a day instead of three…
Feeding prisoners is a lot of work — not only cooking and cleaning up, but moving inmates from cells or dorms over to the mess hall.
Illinois Department of Corrections spokesman Tom Shaer says at some prisons, breakfast is served at 4 a.m., which means moving inmates in the dark. […]
But the John Howard Association, an independent prison watchdog, cautions that in Ohio, a similar brunch program caused health problems among inmates who hadn’t eaten enough to property digest their medication.
An official with AFSCME, the union that represents prison guards, says brunch is OK as long as it’s properly staffed and there’s enough food to meet inmates’ dietary needs.
* Meanwhile, late Friday, IDOC’s Tom Shaer responded to a Thursday post about there being no more prison dogs…
In yesterday’s entry, you wrote as fact something that is not true and about which IDOC was not asked:
Without those dogs, the guards have to do the cell and visitor searches on their own, so contraband could get by them.
This is incorrect. IDOC regularly uses dogs to search for contraband. As I’ve told other media, we have arrangements with local police and county sheriff departments for use of canines. The IDOC K-9 positions were eliminated because they weren’t necessary, as we still use dogs whenever we have a need.
—–Also, regarding this:
*** UPDATE *** From AFSCME’s Anders Lindall in comments…
Due to staff cuts, Tower One at Robinson is closed save for three approximately hourlong periods each day. Contrary to Shaer’s claim, frontline employees at Robinson report that Tower One is located just 200 yards from where the escape occurred and has a direct line of sight over the area.
This is incorrect. According to the Robinson CC Warden, two IDOC chiefs and a Lieutenant involved the search, no guard tower has direct line of sight to the normally unused area from which inmate work trustee Jared Carter walked away. As you know, Robinson is a minimum-security facility and Carter had clearance to be outside the walls, always supervised. There had not been a walk-away or other escape from Illinois prisons in years. Security at Robinson CC and throughout IDOC is effective, which is why we do not have these occurrences.
23 Comments
|
Today’s quote
Monday, Sep 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Jim Edgar asked an AP reporter a couple of questions about his story on GOP gubernatorial candidate Bruce Rauner…
For a candidate seeking support, [Rauner] comes on strong and can sometimes give offense.
“Have you met him? Did you get to talk?” former Republican Gov. Jim Edgar asked sardonically. Edgar has — and didn’t.
Heh.
13 Comments
|
Two sets of victims
Monday, Sep 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* At first glance, I, like Eric Zorn, was somewhat puzzled about this story…
Gov. Pat Quinn has asked the director of a state commission vetting allegations of police torture to step down amid complaints from victims’ families that the commission violated Illinois law by excluding them from the process.
Quinn said in a letter released Wednesday that he had asked David Thomas to resign from the Illinois Torture Inquiry and Relief Commission immediately, “and if he does not do so the commission should remove him.”
While the commission’s assignment to look for possibly torture-induced confessions was critical, “it is just as critical … to hear from the families of the murdered victims,” Quinn stated in the letter, which was addressed to Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez, who had written to the governor expressing concerns about the treatment of victims’ families.
* Zorn…
What possible information, let alone relevant information, could the family members of crime victims have to offer a panel exploring the narrow and preliminary issue of whether the suspect or suspects in the related crime were tortured while in police custody?
How could it possibly be useful — never mind “critical” — to hear from them at such a stage in the review process? […]
(W)hat “input” could victims’ families possibly offer when it comes to legal determinations about investigatory/procedural matters to which they were not witnesses?
The alleged “victim” here is actually the person who may have been tortured. The original “victims” wouldn’t have any knowledge of that.
* But Chuck Goudie’s I-Team also jumped into the fray…
“We are outraged and we think the people of Illinois would be outraged if they knew what we know,” said Joe Heinrich, murder victim’s brother.
What Joe Heinrich says he knows started precisely thirty years and two weeks ago, in 1983. His sister JoEllen Pueschel and her husband Dean were savagely killed in their West Rogers Park apartment. Son Ricky saw it. The then-11-year old was left for dead, but survived and testified against Jerry Mahaffey and his brother Reginald. Ricky is now 41 years old.
“Without question they are the ones who swung the bats, they are the ones who grabbed the gun, the ones who stabbed the knives. They are the ones who did unthinkable things to my mother,” said Rick Pueschel, attack survivor.
Murder-con Jerry Mahaffey claims he was tortured into confessing under the regime of notorious police commander Jon Burge. When Mahaffey asked the new Illinois torture commission to review his case, under state law, the victims’ family members were to be notified. But they never were.
* From the state law…
The 2009 law establishing the commission states that in cases where evidence of torture is found, the director “shall use all due diligence to notify the victim and explain the inquiry process,” and notify victims of their “right to present his or her views and concerns throughout the … investigation.”
So, the commission screwed up and didn’t follow the law.
* Then again, Zorn quotes DePaul College of Law professor Len Cavise, a member of the commission…
The work of the Commission has absolutely nothing to do with underlying guilt or innocence. We have no power whatsoever to retry the case or even to examine the weight of the evidence. Our statutory charge is solely to determine whether physical coercion led to a confession in the case. If we so find, the case is referred to the Chief Judge for further proceedings. At that point, our work is done. It is then up to the court to determine the relationship between the torture and the conviction…..
As much as we welcome the participation of the families of the victims of crime as well as the families of the victims of torture, most families have no personal knowledge as to whether or not the police tortured the defendant. I repeat we are only looking at torture, not the underlying case. The underlying case is an inquiry for the courts and we are not a court.
OK, I get all that, but state law is state law. I don’t remember the details, but I’m betting the bill was crafted in a way to make sure it could pass, and that meant making sure the original victims were notified. The commission dropped the ball.
It’s possible, even probable, that Burge and his thugs used torture to “frame” guilty men. While admittedly irrelevant to the commission’s mission, the original victims still have a right to be heard.
Your thoughts?
21 Comments
|
One battle almost over, others to begin
Monday, Sep 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…
Several members of the Illinois General Assembly’s special pension reform committee told me last week that they believed a final proposal would emerge within the next week to 10 days.
The conference committee has been working since June on a solution to the state’s nearly $100 billion long-term pension funding shortfall, after Gov. Pat Quinn urged members to find a way around the spring legislative session’s gridlock on the issue.
For the past several weeks, the committee, made up of three Democrats and two Republicans from each chamber, has been working on “tweaks” to ideas that they’ve discussed behind closed doors.
As I write this, there was no word on what the final proposal would look like, but there was real concern among Democrats I spoke with that the Republicans might decide not to go along. While the Republicans on the committee have strongly indicated they’re committed to finding a solution, three of the four GOP members are running for higher office — Sen. Bill Brady (governor), Rep. Jil Tracy (lieutenant governor) and Rep. Darlene Senger (U.S. House).
The Democrats fear that any strong objections from traditional Republican allies, particularly in big business, could spook those GOP members into opposition. And, as is usually the case with this sort of stuff, the chaos created by no solution could be more politically beneficial to the Republicans in next year’s election than getting this monster off the table now.
Despite their super-majority status in both chambers, it’ll be impossible for the Democrats to pass a reform bill without significant Republican assistance. Democratic members are just too closely allied with union interests.
Plus, as long as there is no pension reform proposal for Chicago (and none is on the horizon), Mayor Rahm Emanuel has little or no incentive to lobby his Democratic members to pass a bill and billions of dollars in budgetary reasons to quietly oppose it until he gets what he wants.
In the House, a majority of Republicans sided with the public employee unions last spring when they voted against Speaker Michael Madigan’s pension reform bill. That bill passed with just two votes above the bare majority, so there are few to spare.
And while Madigan (D-Chicago) probably has some votes in his back pocket that he can bring out to cushion the roll call a little more (depending on what Emanuel does, of course), it’s doubtful that any of the House Republican “no” votes will flip to “yes” once the compromise is unveiled.
That means that about all of the House Republicans who voted for the business-backed Madigan bill in May will have to vote for the pension reform committee’s report when it gets a vote, likely during the upcoming veto session.
Aside from the politics, there are some legitimate concerns being raised by Republicans about what they know of the proposal so far. They believe the savings assumptions are based on what they view as a too-low projection of the inflation rate.
Despite three straight decades of low inflation, there are those who insist that a wave of high inflation could return with a vengeance, blowing those savings projections out of the water.
Another concern is the back-loaded nature of the savings. About $94 billion of the $146 billion the bill is projected to save the state will occur between fiscal years 2045 and 2050. It’ll be tough to allow most of the income tax hike to expire in 2015 if more pension savings can’t be found upfront.
The details leaked out of the committee so far add up to a savings of $1.14 billion in fiscal 2015 — not nearly enough to ensure that crucial programs could be spared from the ax if most of the income tax increase goes away.
And make no mistake, achieving the expiration of the higher income tax is the reason behind much of the public demands by business groups for cutting the pension benefits of state workers, teachers and university employees.
About the only recourse the Democrats will have to prevent this from getting out of hand is to threaten to run the Senate-passed, labor-backed reform bill, that’s opposed by business, if Republicans refuse to go along with a compromise.
That possibility is already being floated. Such a vote would get the unions off the Democrats’ backs, and the GOP most certainly knows this.
The vote wouldn’t stop the demands for more reform, however, and the New York credit ratings agencies might not love it either. The Democrats clearly know this as well. So we could end up with a high-stakes game of “chicken” next month.
61 Comments
|
This is how it’s done
Friday, Sep 13, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* We’ve seen some pretty lame campaign kickoffs this year. Videos, social media, three-city car tours, etc. This one is the most impressive by far. From a press release…
TOPINKA EMBARKS ON ‘COMMON SENSE EXPRESS’ ANNOUNCEMENT TOUR
Comptroller begins three-day statewide bus tour Sunday
CHICAGO –Judy Baar Topinka will board the “Common Sense Express” Sunday and begin a three-day, nine-stop statewide tour to announce her re-election campaign for Illinois Comptroller.
Topinka will begin her journey surrounded by supporters Sunday morning in Chicago and conclude Tuesday evening in Marion, making stops with her “Common Sense Express” bus throughout the state along the way. Specifically, the Announcement tour will include: Chicago, Rockford, Moline, Peoria, Quincy, Springfield, Edwardsville, Mt. Vernon and Marion.
Topinka will join a rally of local leaders and supporters in each community for a short program, and then be available to media. A mult box will be available to media outlets at each location.
SCHEDULE FOR SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2013:
10:30 a.m.: CHICAGO TOPINKA RALLY
Billy Goat Tavern, 1535 W. Madison, Chicago
Program participants include: Cook County Board Commissioner Liz Gorman, Lake County Board Chairman Aaron Lawlor
2:30 p.m.: ROCKFORD TOPINKA RALLY
Stone Eagle Tavern, 6445 E. State St., Rockford
Program participants include: Winnebago County Board Chairman Scott Christiansen, Winnebago GOP Chairman Jim Thompson, State Sen. Dave Syverson
5 p.m.: QUAD CITIES TOPINKA RALLY
Rock Island County GOP HQ, 1721 5th Ave., Suite 100, Moline
Participants include: Rock Island GOP Chairman Mike Steffen, Bobby Schilling
SCHEDULE FOR MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2013:
9:30 a.m.: PEORIA TOPINKA RALLY
Peoria County GOP HQ, 8835 N. Knoxville Rd., Peoria
Program participants include: Peoria County GOP Chairman Katherine Koyle, State Rep. David Leitch, State Rep. Mike Unes, State Sen. Darin LaHood, U.S. Congressman Aaron Schock
2 p.m.: QUINCY TOPINKA RALLY
Villa Katherine, 532 Gardner Expressway, Quincy
Program participants include: Mayor Kyle Moore
5:30 p.m.: SPRINGFIELD TOPINKA RALLY
Route 66 Hotel & Conference Center, 625 E. St. Joseph St., Springfield
Participants include: Sangamon County Sheriff Neil Williamson, Sangamon County GOP Chairman Rosemarie Long, Governor Jim Edgar
SCHEDULE FOR TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2013:
10 a.m.: EDWARDSVILLE TOPINKA RALLY
Madison County Courthouse, 155 N. Main St., #120, Edwardsville
Participants include: Madison County Republican Women’s Club Chairman Amy Sholar, Edwardsville Mayor Hal Patton, Congressman Rodney Davis
1 p.m.: MT. VERNON TOPINKA RALLY
Papa Z’s Ice Cream Shop, 1812 Broadway, Mt. Vernon
NOTE: Ice cream served as part of “Get the Scoop on Us” kickoff rally
Participants include: State Rep. John Cavaletto, Mt. Vernon Mayor Jane Chelsey, State Sen. Kyle McCarter
5:30 p.m.: MARION TOPINKA RALLY
17th Street BBQ, 2700 17th St., Marion
Participants include: State Rep. Mike Bost, Williamson County GOP Chairman Sue Hamilton, State Sen. Dave Luechtefeld
Two taverns, an ice cream shop and a famous barbeque joint, plus a bunch of other stops along the way. I like it.
9 Comments
|
Department of dumb ideas
Friday, Sep 13, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I tried restraining myself, but I just gotta say, this is probably the most stupid reaction to the “Statehouse doors” controversy I’ve yet seen. From Rep. Dwight Kay’s website…
Do you think the Illinois State Capitol should have copper doors valued at $670,000? Illinois State Representative Dwight Kay (R-Glen Carbon) thinks they should be sold. Rep. Kay recently introduced legislation to auction off the outlandish doors to the highest bidder and use the revenue to pay unpaid bills or reinvest in education. […]
Rep. Kay’s resolution (HJR48) orders that the new copper doors be removed from the capitol building’s west side entrance to be auctioned off or sold to the highest bidder. Rep. Kay added, “we can have beautiful doors appropriate for the capitol for an amount less than what was spent on copper doors by the administration.”
The resolution actually goes further than that…
RESOLVED, That we urge the Architect of the Capitol to direct the revenue from the sale of the copper doors towards Illinois’ public education system or to pay down unpaid bills;
So, who might be in the market for custom, made-to-fit, copper-plated doors? Maybe scrap dealers. And then we take the few bucks we get, put it toward schools or bills and then spend even more money to put up some doors on the western entrance?
Got it.
Great.
* Meanwhile, from a Chicago Tribune editorial…
The General Assembly “skipped the requirement of justifying why the investment was a higher priority than the needed improvements to our water, roads, public transit and education systems,” says the Civic Federation’s Laurence Msall.
From Msall’s official bio…
Msall was the Senior Advisor for Economic Development for Illinois Governor George H. Ryan. Msall was responsible for the oversight of eleven of the state’s economic development and infrastructure-related agencies including the Departments of Commerce and Community Affairs, Revenue, Transportation, and the state’s housing and other development authorities
Yes,. and there was no waste at all in George Ryan’s Illinois FIRST capital plan. Nope. None. Not even the stained glass windows in a suburban parking garage.
* In other news…
The architect in charge of a $50 million renovation project at the Illinois Capitol is defending his work in the wake of criticism from Gov. Pat Quinn, saying Friday that the governor was “completely out of line.”
J. Richard Alsop III has come under fire for portions of the project Quinn has deemed “excessive,” including three sets of copper-plated doors that cost nearly $700,000, as well as expensive chandeliers and light fixtures of robed maidens. Earlier this week Quinn said Alsop needed to be “reined in” by the board that oversees the architect’s office, a comment Alsop said was “unwarranted.”
“It’s completely unfair,” Alsop said Friday. “We were given a direction. The scope was agreed to long before I got here, money was appropriated long before I got here. We did the best job we could with the resources that we had.” […]
Both Alsop and the board also sought to place some of the responsibility back on Quinn, saying all contracts were vetted and approved by the Capital Development Board, an agency that reports to the governor’s office.
“I think there is a misunderstanding about the way the process works here,” Alsop said after the meeting. “This office isn’t solely responsible for the project that happened in the complex and I think it’s important that people realize that’s the case.”
30 Comments
|
Question of the day
Friday, Sep 13, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The setup…
As expected, the Illinois Supreme Court Thursday named Justice Rita Garman to become the court’s next chief justice, making her the second woman to head the state’s high court.
The Danville Republican will take over from Chief Justice Thomas Kilbride after his term concludes Oct. 25. Garman will serve as the state’s top jurist for a three-year term.
Garman, who was chosen for the slot by a unanimous vote of the justices, was appointed to the court in 2001 to fill the vacancy left by former Justice Ben Miller, who retired. Garman was elected to a 10-year term on the court in 2002 and retained by voters for a second full term last year.
“I am honored and humbled to have been chosen by my colleagues to serve as chief justice,” Garman said in a prepared statement. “The office has been held by many great jurists, several of whom I have served with and count among my friends.
* A recent photo…
* The Question: At the risk of destroying myself if I ever end up in front of her… Caption?
47 Comments
|
What’s at stake
Friday, Sep 13, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* An e-mail from NRA lobbyist Todd Vandermyde about yesterday’s Illinois Supreme Court rulings on the right to carry guns in public…
Rich — here is the dilemma the state is now in.
Both the Federal Court and now the State Supreme Court have said that that there is a right to carry a firearm in public.
So the state passed a law that provides a way to carry a gun in public — get a carry permit. Yet, as of today, no carry permit exists for people to obtain. No state courses have been approved for people to even take to be able to apply for their permit.
So what is the relief? If the Courts say, carry ban unconstitutional, and the State has no way for us to comply with the “relief” of obtaining a carry permit — now what? And a growing amount of thinking is it is legal to carry today with a FOID card.
Now remember that for 90 days we have had FOID carry in 15 counties. No extra training. No extra anything. And I have yet to hear of any problems, road rage incidents, fights over parking spots, shootouts at Starbucks or anything in those 15 counties.
The court said on page 8:
Again, in the “form presently before us, section 24-1.6(a)(1), (a)(3)(A) categorically prohibits the possession and use of an operable firearm for self defense outside the home. In other words, section 24-1.6(a)(1), (a)(3)(A) amounts to a wholesale statutory ban on the exercise of a personal right that is specifically named in and guaranteed by the United States Constitution, as construed by the United States Supreme Court. In no other context would we permit this, and we will not permit it here either.”
So tell me how the state or the Court allows the ban on carry, in effect today, to go on any longer?
He has a point.
* Here is the language for 24-1.6(a)(1)…
Sec. 24-1.6. Aggravated unlawful use of a weapon.
(a) A person commits the offense of aggravated unlawful use of a weapon when he or she knowingly:
(1) Carries on or about his or her person or in any vehicle or concealed on or about his or her person except when on his or her land or in his or her abode, legal dwelling, or fixed place of business, or on the land or in the legal dwelling of another person as an invitee with that person’s permission, any pistol, revolver, stun gun or taser or other firearm
And here’s (a)(3)(A) …
(3) [Or] One of the following factors is present:
(A) the firearm, other than a pistol, revolver, or handgun, possessed was uncased, loaded, and immediately accessible at the time of the offense
* And here’s the response to the rulings from the Second Amendment Foundation…
he Second Amendment Foundation is applauding the Illinois State Supreme Court, which has unanimous ruled that the right to keep and bear arms is not confined to the home and that a state statute regarding aggravated unlawful use of weapons (AUUW) violates the Second Amendment.
In the ruling, written by Justice Robert R. Thomas, the court states, “As the Seventh Circuit correctly noted, neither Heller nor McDonald expressly limits the Second Amendment’s protections to the home. On the contrary, both decisions contain language strongly suggesting if not outright confirming that the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms extends beyond the home.”
“This is one more court rejection of claims by anti-gunners that the right to keep and bear arms is somehow confined to the home,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb.
The case at issue, Illinois v. Alberto Aguilar, dates back to June 12, 2008, slightly more than two weeks prior to the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller.
The case challenged a section of the law that prohibited carrying firearms outside the home that, according to the court, “…amounts to a wholesale statutory ban on the exercise of a personal right that is specifically named in and guaranteed by the United States Constitution, as construed by the United States Supreme Court. In no other context would we permit this, and we will not permit it here either.”
The court footnotes that the Illinois General Assembly has enacted the state’s Firearm Concealed Carry Act due to SAF’s victory in Moore v. Madigan, which is cited in today’s ruling. The Act amended the state statute to “allow for a limited right to carry certain firearms in public.” The court also noted that “Neither the Firearms Concealed Carry Act nor the amended (state) statute is at issue in this case.”
Still, recognition that the AUUW section violated the Second Amendment is significant, Gottlieb said.
“Here we have a state Supreme Court declaring a section of state law unconstitutional under the Second Amendment,” he said. “That would not have happened without our victories in McDonald and Moore, and it affirms our effort to win back firearms freedoms one lawsuit at a time.”
And yet, yesterday’s Supreme Court decisions received almost no media coverage in Illinois.
60 Comments
|
Board responds to “doors” outrage
Friday, Sep 13, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a press release…
“The decision to renovate the west wing of the Capitol was part of the Illinois Jobs Now! program approved by the General Assembly and the governor in 2009.
While much attention is given to the finishes that restore the building back to its original period of significance, that focus represents a mere fraction of the work being done to restore the Capitol. This renovation was primarily about life safety and making the necessary infrastructure changes needed to stabilize the building for future generations.
The Office of the Architect of the Capitol worked with this Board and Capital Development Board to ensure that all procedural requirements were followed and the fiscal limits of the plan were respected. As a result, we will have a safer and more accessible building that will stand the test of time while appropriately reflecting the greatness of the state.
The Board will continue to ensure that we uphold these standards, review our policies and preserve this national historic landmark on behalf of its occupants, visitors and Illinois taxpayers.”
Office of the Architect of the Capitol Board:
Tim Anderson
Brad Bolin
Scott Kaiser
Tim Mapes
Those signatories are the two House clerks and Senate secretaries, representing both parties. Mapes, of course, is also House Speaker Michael Madigan’s chief of staff.
Needless to say, it’s highly doubtful that any of the four would sign on to this statement without an OK from above.
38 Comments
|
Quinn asked for slating session
Friday, Sep 13, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I told subscribers yesterday that Gov. Pat Quinn had asked for a state party slating session. It appears this time around, though, that Bill Daley’s campaign will try to deny Quinn the award. The governor will need 60 percent to get the slating, and there are some Democrats who think he might be stopped, but others who say Quinn wouldn’t have asked for the session if he didn’t firmly believe he’d win. If he is denied the slating, that’ll be a huge embarrassment. If he gets it, then I’m not sure it means a whole lot, except to show party members that he’s one of them…
Illinois’ top Democrats will gather for their first formal primary election endorsement session in nearly a decade this month amid expectations they will back Gov. Pat Quinn for re-election against rival Bill Daley.
On Thursday, House Speaker Michael Madigan, the state’s Democratic chairman, announced a slating session for Sept. 22 in Springfield. The race for governor is the only statewide battle being contested by major candidates in the March 18 primary.
Steve Brown, Madigan’s spokesman, said the decision to call the endorsement session was made after a request by Quinn. That indicates Quinn believes he has enough support among the 38 members of the Democratic State Central Committee to capture the endorsement.
Quinn campaign aides were not available for comment. Tom Bowen, Daley’s campaign manager, said the Democratic challenger would reach out to members of the committee to urge them to support an open primary in which no endorsement is made.
Discuss.
20 Comments
|
Budget cutting consequences
Friday, Sep 13, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The problems at Cook County’s jail are never-ending, and appear to be getting worse. One reason is the huge influx of the mentally ill, which now account for more than 20 percent of the jail’s inmate population. And a big reason behind that population surge is state budget cuts to mental health budgets. Tribune…
After dipping to 8,900 in 2011, the average annual jail population — primarily inmates awaiting trial — has been on the rise, with the daily count now frequently more than 10,000, the highest totals since a day in 2007. […]
While the jail is overcrowded, detainees no longer sleep on mattresses on the floor, as they did during some other episodes of overcrowding, and the sheriff, whose operation of the jail is monitored by a federal judge, no longer assigns inmates to sleep on bunks in shifts.
The exception is at Cermak Health Services, the county-run hospital on the jail grounds where acutely mentally ill inmates are treated and patients sometimes sleep on mattresses the floor, according to the sheriff’s office. […]
More than 2,000 mentally ill detainees are being held at the jail, and many of them have medical issues as well, said Superintendent Robert Lyles, who runs Division 2, the jail’s largest unit. “When the state hospital and private (mental health) facilities were shut down, it seemed like the jail had to adapt,” he said. “It’s a challenge every day.”
Some mentally ill inmates are kept longer than necessary because no beds are available in state treatment centers when a judge finds them unfit to stand trial, public defenders and others involved in the cases said. Although Gov. Pat Quinn has pledged to boost spending on mental health services next year by $25 million, [Sheriff Tom Dart] and other officials are skeptical.
Go read the whole thing.
19 Comments
|
How far can that choice go?
Friday, Sep 13, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a Dispatch-Argus story about Republican gubernatorial candidate Bruce Rauner…
Mr. Rauner has long been involved with the charter school movement in Chicago. If elected to the governor’s office, he said he would push for more competition among schools across Illinois.
“I think we’ve got to create competition and choice to the broken monopoly that’s our system,” he said. “We need charter schools, we need vouchers.” […]
Illinois has a cap of 120 charter schools, with a maximum of 75 allowed in Chicago and 45 for the rest of the state. That cap, Mr. Rauner said, is supported by teachers’ unions and should be lifted. […]
Mr. Rauner said parents should be allowed to choose which public school their children attend.
“We should have vouchers, so that when a school is failing parents can afford to take their child to whatever schools work for them,” he said.
Since he clouted his own kid into Payton Prep after “moving” from Winnetka to Chicago, perhaps he’d be willing to let kids who attend sub-par Chicago schools enroll at Winnetka’s New Trier High School?
Now, that would be a dramatic gesture.
* Also, I have yet to see a study that shows charter schools as a whole are outperforming “regular” public schools in Illinois. I actually like the idea of charter schools if it gives parents real choices and the possibility of opting out of the industrial education model. But, so far, charters in general aren’t doing anything spectacular here except helping to break the teachers’ unions and provide patronage opportunities for the political establishment.
49 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Comments Off
|
Bill Daley wants to wait on slating
Thursday, Sep 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I told you earlier today that the Democratic Party of Illinois plans to meet later this month to decide whether to slate statewide candidates before the primary. This is from Bill Daley’s campaign manager Tom Bowen…
“The Democratic Party of Illinois should allow its voters to hear more about the candidates for Governor and their choices for Lieutenant Governor before selecting a candidate for endorsement. A vote to not endorse allows this process to play itself out and let the people choose their nominee.”
17 Comments
|
* Illinois Review…
Joe Walsh for U.S. Senate 2014? While the title is just a teaser but the former Illinois congressman and current talk show host is talking about it. He spoke to about 60 people Tuesday night for the Chicago Young Republicans monthly business at the Hubbard inn.
Walsh brought up the U.S. Senate race. He said he Is giving “serious consideration” to running against Dick Durbin. Of course, he would have to win the GOP primary first.
On the other hand, last Saturday Walsh told Will County Tea Partiers he was focused on helping other candidates in 2014.
FYI, there are also rampant rumors about a possible Walsh primary bid against Congressman Adam Kinzinger.
*** UPDATE *** IR…
Within minutes of posting that former Congressman Joe Walsh told Chicago Young Republicans he’s “seriously considering” a bid against Dick Durbin in 2014, sources told Illinois Review that Walsh associates are telling people he’s taking a serious look at challenging Congressman Adam Kinzinger, and that Club for Growth is encouraging him.
“We won’t confirm to whom we have or haven’t spoken concerning a primary in the 16th CD,” Club for Growth’s Barney Keller told IR, “but we’re certainly interested in talking to a pro-growth alternative to Kinzinger.”
“Adam Kinzinger is one of the biggest RINOs in the U.S. House,” Keller said, and listed several votes Kinzinger made in the past year that were opposite of the Club’s positions. “He voted for the fiscal cliff, opposed the budget conservative Congress members supported. He was one of only ten Republicans that voted for a bill that was one of Nancy Pelosi’s pet projects for her San Francisco district.”
30 Comments
|
Vacation photos
Thursday, Sep 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Before leaving for vacation, we dropped Oscar the Puppy off at a “pet resort.” It was a nice place, very clean. Oscar had a two-room suite and his own flat-screen TV. And the price was more than reasonable, so, I figured, what the heck.
The “resort” owners posted pics of Oscar on their Facebook page. Here he is tearing around the place like he does when he needs to blow off some energy…
He made some new friends and played Frisbee…
Some of the other dogs couldn’t keep up with him, but this one turned out to be his bestest buddy…
And then he got a haircut…
Yikes!!!
Man, that’s short. He looks so different I wouldn’t recognize him on the street.
Oh, well, it’ll grow out.
Here’s a pic I took on our way home…
You might be able to see in his eyes how tired he was. He played very hard. But he’s happy to be home. I’m happy he’s home, too.
25 Comments
|
“Convenient” timing on HQ move
Thursday, Sep 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Greg Hinz has an hilarious follow-up to the governor’s announcement that I told you about earlier today…
Just a day after a big Illinois manufacturer announced that it’s moving 400 jobs to Wisconsin from Lake County, Gov. Pat Quinn today tried to even up the public relations score by announcing that a well-known beverage company “is opening” its new U.S. headquarters on the Near West Side.
In fact, the U.S. headquarters of Mike’s Hard Lemonade Co. opened here in April 2012 — a year and a half ago.
Mr. Quinn’s office counters that the move and the 80 new jobs Mike’s will have here are real and never had been announced as the company quietly filled out its executive team. So are the up to $1.86 million in payroll tax credits Mike’s will get over the next decade, plus a $25,000 job-training grant.
But the timing of today’s press-release announcement certainly is “convenient,” Quinn spokeswoman Brooke Anderson conceded.
Oh, for crying out loud.
16 Comments
|
The final final term?
Thursday, Sep 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Secretary of State Jesse White announced his reelection bid today…
One of the things that sets White apart is the promise he kept when he was asked years ago whether he would use the secretary of state’s office as a stepping stone to run for governor.
“And I said I would run for this office and this office only,” White said. “I’m true to my commitment. I always want my word to be good.”
Um. From 2009…
Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White is seeking re-election for the last time.
The Democratic state officer said if re-elected to a fourth term in 2010, he will retire in 2014 and pursue only volunteer work.
Obviously, he changed his mind.
* White also admitted to a big mistake today…
White did acknowledge one mistake: his backing of Rep. Derrick Smith. White helped Smith get appointed to the Illinois House in 2011 only to see Smith be charged with bribery by federal authorities less than a year later. White said he “tried to set the record straight” by calling for Smith to step down and backing his challenger, but voters decided to re-elect Smith anyway, even after Smith was kicked out of the Illinois House.
No word yet on whether White will field a primary challenger against Rep. Smith.
* And he got a boost from MRE…
White launched his re-election bid at a downtown hotel where he was introduced by Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who noted that White supported his efforts to become mayor. Emanuel said he wasn’t just backing White to return to the favor, but because of their “shared bond” of public service and White’s “commitment to the next generation coming behind us.” White is well known for the youth tumbling team that bears his name.
White will make another campaign stop today in Springfield. A Republican candidate has yet to surface, leading White to quip that “life is good.”
13 Comments
|
State Dems to consider slating
Thursday, Sep 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a press release…
Democratic Party of Illinois Chairman Michael J. Madigan announced Thursday that the party’s state central committee will meet Sunday, September 22 to discuss the slating of statewide candidates for next year’s General Election.
“We plan to have a vital campaign in every region of the state and this meeting will give the candidates an opportunity to convey the strengths they bring to the ticket,” Chairman Madigan said.
The meeting will take place on Sunday, September 22 at 2 p.m. in the Governor’s Ballroom at the State House Inn, located at 101 East Adams Street in Springfield. Members of the public are encouraged to attend.
The democratic state central committee is composed of 38 members, one man and one woman elected from each congressional district. Each member will have a weighted vote in selecting the nominee that is equal to the number of Democratic ballots cast in their congressional district in the February 2, 2010 primary election.
DPI hasn’t slated statewide candidates in a primary since Lisa Madigan first ran for attorney general. [ADDING: I was reminded by a commenter that DPI slated Paul Mangieri in 2006 for treasurer. He lost to Alexi Giannoulias.]
22 Comments
|
* This story has been getting some play…
It took more than four days for the Illinois Department of Corrections to capture escaped prisoner Jared Carter. The hunt involved more than 100 department employees, as well as helicopters, airplanes, and state police personnel. But there’s one thing that was left out of the search due to Illinois state budget cuts: a prison canine unit.
To help slash his state’s budget, Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn nixed five dog-handling jobs in the department last year, according to information obtained by The Quad-City Times. And, without handlers, that meant Gov. Quinn had to lay off the dogs.
Local police dogs were used in the search, which the Department of Corrections says worked out fine.
* But there were some items in Kurt Erickson’s original story unrelated to the search for the escaped prisoner that stood out for me. For instance…
The unit was in place primarily to search cells for drugs and contraband, and to sniff out problems with visitors and vendors.
Without those dogs, the guards have to do the cell and visitor searches on their own, so contraband could get by them.
* And then there’s this…
Along with having no dogs within the agency to search for fugitives, Shaer confirmed that one of the guard towers was not staffed when Carter walked off.
But, he said, Carter’s departure spot could not be viewed from the tower anyway. “The tower being manned was not a factor,” he added.
Oy.
*** UPDATE *** From AFSCME’s Anders Lindall in comments…
Due to staff cuts, Tower One at Robinson is closed save for three approximately hourlong periods each day. Contrary to Shaer’s claim, frontline employees at Robinson report that Tower One is located just 200 yards from where the escape occurred and has a direct line of sight over the area.
Perimeter security has also been reduced at Robinson due to lack of staff. A van that used to patrol the facility’s perimeter 24-7 is now in use only from dusk to dawn, and even then not continuously as the van driver also performs other duties.
So at the time of this escape, the tower nearest the site was closed, there was no patrol outside the perimeter - and no canine unit to respond.
All this at a facility more than 200% overcrowded. Built for 600 inmates, Robinson had 1,209 at the department’s last quarterly report to the General Assembly.
26 Comments
|
* From the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel...
An Illinois lighting company with 400 employees plans to move across the state line to Kenosha — the second manufacturer in a week to say it will leave northern Illinois for Wisconsin.
Kenall Manufacturing plans to relocate its headquarters and factory from Gurnee, Ill., to a 354,000-square-foot facility to be built near I-94 along Highway 158.
The company is getting over a million dollars in incentives…
One aspect of the various government incentives is ready: Kenosha County will provide $1 million from a special economic development fund authorized two years ago, County Executive Jim Kreuser said.
Another $250,000 from the fund was used recently to help woo Hanna Cylinders from Libertyville, Ill., to Kenosha County. That relocation, announced last week, will bring about 100 manufacturing jobs to Pleasant Prairie by the end of the year. Hanna, which makes hydraulic and pneumatic cylinders, will occupy a 105,000-square-foot plant in Lakeview Corporate Park.
* But the specific incentives are only part of the bigger picture…
Another key to luring companies such as Kenall to Wisconsin, he believes, is the virtual phasing out of the state corporate tax on income generated by manufacturing production. Enacted in 2011, the legislation will effectively cut the tax on production from 7.9% to 0.4% over the next few years, Battle said.
He said Kenall and other firms consider “the direction and velocity of the state’s business climate” when making location decisions, and that the elimination of almost all of the tax on production earnings “clearly was in our favor.”
* But the Hanna Cylinders move has a bright side…
(A) Chicago-based developer already has eyed the site along Route 176 for an industrial facility.
Bridge Development Partners LLC plans to invest $25 million to $30 million in two buildings with a mix of light assembly, manufacturing and warehousing uses.
The project marks the first speculative construction of its kind in Libertyville in several years.
Although the facility would be built without specific tenants in mind, the site could attract 200 to 300 jobs — a “realistic expectation,” said Mark Christensen, a principal with the commercial real estate firm.
* And this is from a press release…
Governor Pat Quinn and Mike’s Hard Lemonade Co. today announced that the premium malt beverage maker is opening its new U.S Headquarters in Illinois, creating 80 jobs. The office, located at Jackson and Jefferson Streets in Chicago’s West Loop, is positioned to tap into the region’s substantial marketing talent and consumer product expertise. The announcement is part of Governor Quinn’s agenda to drive Illinois’ economy forward and create jobs.
“Mike’s chose to relocate to Illinois because of the state’s central location, leading education institutions and its progressive business environment,” Governor Quinn said. “The presence of a dynamic company like Mike’s is the kind of business Illinois needs to advance our vision of becoming one of the most exciting and vibrant business corridors in the nation.”
* Related…
* Chicago-area foreclosures down 59% from last August
* In Quest For Lower Taxes, How Far Is Too Far?
* Whole Foods coming to Englewood
48 Comments
|
Door quotes
Thursday, Sep 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* House Speaker Michael Madigan’s press secretary Steve Brown reacting to Gov. Pat Quinn’s angry denunciation of the pricey Statehouse renovations…
“It looks like the governor’s a couple days late, possibly jet-lagged from his trip to Japan, because he took his usual Sunday morning press conference cheap shot and did it on a Tuesday afternoon.”
Ouch.
* And not everybody is up in arms about the alleged scandal…
A spokeswoman for Senate Minority Leader Christine Radogno (R-Lemont), whose office is in the newly renovated wing, defended the expenditures and the project, in general.
“At this point in time, any spending on anything can be made to look extravagant,” Radogno spokeswoman Patty Schuh said. “But this is part of a long-term, long-range maintenance and restoration plan for a historical building that has 200,000 people in it every year. The bulk of the project is the beyond-necessary mechanical fixes, ADA access and life-safety and fire code requirements.”
* Meanwhile, there’s more than a little doubt that the governor’s “suspension” of funding for more Statehouse construction actually means anything…
“It’s up to the governor whether to make that money available for bidding and construction purposes,” Blanchette said. “And that’s what he’s doing, is holding up the release of funding for items that have already been placed in the budget by the General Assembly, until such time as things can be carefully examined.”
But no money has actually been appropriated for the north wing yet. So is anything actually being halted?
“No, there’s nothing to stop at this point,” UIS Political Science Professor Kent Redfield said.
Redfield believes this was a purely political move by the governor.
“It’s election season, and the state is having a lot of really bad fiscal problems,” Redfield said. “And so this becomes an issue that you can be against it, and particularly since you can’t have any impact on what’s happened, then it’s a pretty easy thing to take a public stand on it.”
…Adding… I forgot to post this one…
Former White House Chief of Staff Bill Daley, who’s also trying to win the Democratic nomination for governor, says Quinn is ultimately responsible.
“The problem with the governor’s action is, he was asleep at the switch when all this funding was approved,” says Daley’s campaign manager, Tom Bowen. “So this action is typical of Gov. Quinn: too little, too late, reacting to a mistake that’s already been made.”
25 Comments
|
* 9:57 am - The Illinois Supreme Court has issued two gun-control rulings that are undoubtedly bringing great cheer to the NRA.
In the first, People v. Aguilar, a person was arrested in his own friend’s Chicago yard because he was holding a pistol. The Supremes cited the Heller decision and the 7th US Circuit’s recent landmark public carry decision (Moore v. Madigan) to knock down the arrest as unconstitutional…
if Heller means what it says, and “individual self-defense” is indeed “the central component” of the second amendment right to keep and bear arms (Heller, 554 U.S. at 599), then it would make little sense to restrict that right to the home, as “[c]onfrontations are not limited to the home.” Moore, 702 F.3d at 935-36 […]
Of course, in concluding that the second amendment protects the right to possess and use a firearm for self-defense outside the home, we are in no way saying that such a right is unlimited or is not subject to meaningful regulation. See infra ¶¶ 26-27. That said, we cannot escape the reality that, in this case, we are dealing not with a reasonable regulation but with a comprehensive ban. Again, in the form presently before us, section 24-1.6(a)(1), (a)(3)(A) categorically prohibits the possession and use of an operable firearm for selfdefense outside the home. In other words, section 24-1.6(a)(1), (a)(3)(A) amounts to a wholesale statutory ban on the exercise of a personal right that is specifically named in and guaranteed by the United States Constitution, as construed by the United States Supreme Court. In no other context would we permit this, and we will not permit it here either
However, the defendant in the case was just 17 years old at the time of his arrest and the Supremes decided that the statute regarding age minimums was constitutional…
…for present purposes, we need only express our agreement with the obvious and undeniable conclusion that the possession of handguns by minors is conduct that falls outside the scope of the second amendment’s protection
* The second case, Coram v. Illinois, involved a man who pled guilty to domestic battery in 1992 and paid a $100 fine. At the time, there was no prohibition against Coram possessing a firearm or receiving a FOID card. When he applied for a FOID in 2009, however, he was denied based on a 1996 federal law. The Supremes upheld his right to a FOID card. Read it here.
*** UPDATE *** From John Boch of GunsSaveLife.com in comments…
Our take on the decision: The IL Supreme Court has said today that until and unless the Illinois State Police begin issuing carry licenses, Illinois has a flat prohibition on carry of firearms outside the home and that, ladies and gentlemen, has just been recognized and determined to be in violation of the right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the second amendment to the United States Constitution.
30 Comments
|
Dillard numbers
Thursday, Sep 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* We discussed this quote from Sen. Kirk Dillard yesterday…
To improve education, Dillard said he would prevent Chicago schools from taking about $1 billion they currently take away from downstate schools.
“A child who lives in poverty in downstate should be equal to one in Chicago,” he said.
Dillard was speaking to the Ford County Republicans when he made those comments. Ford County’s population at the last Census was 14,081.
During the 2012-2013 school year, Chicago Public Schools administrators identified 18,669 CPS students as homeless.
* Meanwhile, David Ormsby has a post about Dillard’s campaign reporting $169,300 in contributions last night…
The lion’s share came in three checks of $52,600 each. The contributors were: Illinois Operating Engineers Local 150, Chicago Land Operators Joint Labor-Management PAC, and the Illinois Lunch Pail Republicans PAC.
The $169,300 brings Dillard’s total fundraising from large contributions to $207,300 for the third quarter. Without that large infusion of cash before the third quarter fundraising ends in less than three weeks, Dillard’s campaign would have looked dead-in-the-water by the time campaign finance reporting arrived on October 15.
But…
On September 6, the Lunch Pail reported a $52,600 contribution from the Washington, D.C.-based Engineers Political Education Committee PAC. And three-days later the Pail, which has raised or donated no other money recently, funneled the same amount to Dillard
It looks like the Engineers’ money got laundered.
The Lunchpail Repubicans PAC is all but an arm of Local 150, which has a lot of members involved in road and bridge construction. So maybe we now know why Dillard said recently that he preferred a second gas tax to gaming expansion.
57 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Comments Off
|
Comments Off
|
* From a Paxton Record story on a Ford County gubernatorial candidates forum…
To improve education, Dillard said he would prevent Chicago schools from taking about $1 billion they currently take away from downstate schools.
“A child who lives in poverty in downstate should be equal to one in Chicago,” he said.
OK, but how does cutting dollars to Chicago schools “improve education”?
61 Comments
|
Not looking likely
Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I’ve been saying all along that the fall veto session was probably not the time that a gay marriage bill would pass…
Asked if organizers have added numbers to their “yes” count, [Illinois Unites for Marriage Campaign Manager John Kohlhepp] said, “I believe that we can say that we have.”
But supporters face a tough fight. Those that have switched to the “yes” column have yet to make their stances public, leaving them room to back out. Additionally, the veto session falls before election filing deadlines, increasing chances that lawmakers fearful of primary challenges will balk at voting on controversial bills.
Rick Garcia, policy advisor for The Civil Rights Agenda, said that reality is making him cautious about forecasts for the fall.
“I’m making no predictions because after what happened in May, I’m gun shy about doing that,” Garcia said.
And Garcia suggests another challenge— organizers have yet to secure even 60 votes, he said.
Besides the petition problem, an immediate effective date would require 71 votes, and they don’t even have 60 yet.
* And the Windy City Times’ roll call is more than a little optimistic. For instance…
Dist. 20, Michael McAuliffe (R): McAuliffe voted against civil unions in 2010 and has indicated he would do the same if marriage equality were brought to a vote. “I will not support the legalization of gay marriage in Illinois,” he said in a Daily Herald candidate questionnaire. But sources indicate that McAuliffe may not be more open to a “yes” vote than others.
Dist. 41, Darlene Senger (R): Senger voted “no” on civil unions two years ago, but supporters hope that LGBT people and their allies will press her to vote yes, regardless.
Dist. 60, Rita Mayfield (D): Mayfield’s stance has frustrated LGBT organizers and sponsors of the bill, but she remains a target. She said she wants to vote “yes,” on the bill but will not. She says that her district does not support the measure and that she will vote “present” so as not to betray the will of her constituents. Mayfield’s best friend is reportedly gay.
Senger could help herself in the fall congressional campaign with a “Yes” vote, but she is facing two conservatives in the primary, so I figure a pre-primary floor vote would likely produce a “No.”
* And check out the House Democratic “targets”…
Dist. 21, Silvana Tabares (D): This journalist-turned-lawmaker is new to office. She was not endorsed by Equality Illinois last year, and sources suggest her vote has been hard to pin down.
Dist. 56, Michelle Mussman (D): Mussman stated on a Chicago Sun-Times questionnaire, “I would not support legislation permitting gay marriage. I would support legislation permitting civil unions.” But a Windy City Times reader and 56th Dist. resident said she believes Mussman supports the bill now. Mussman has not returned requests for comment.
Dist. 77, Kathleen Willis (D): Willis’ stance is not widely known, but Equality Illinois endorsed her Republican challenger Skip Saviano over her last year.
Dist. 79, Katherine Cloonen (D): The Daily Journal reported in October that Cloonen was against gay marriage.
Dist. 84, Stephanie A. Kifowit (D): Asked in Oswego Patch candidate questionnaire about same-sex marriage, Kifowit said she believes everyone should enjoy the same rights, but added, “I believe the intent behind Illinois’ recently enacted civil unions law has done just that.” She was not endorsed by Equality Illinois.
Dist. 85, Emily McAsey (D): McAsey stated in her Chicago Sun-Times candidate questionnaire that gay marriage did not appear to be a priority for voters and that her focus was on other things.
Dist. 96, Sue Scherer (D): According to the State Journal-Register, Scherer wants to give civil unions more time to “work through the system” before passing marriage.
Dist. 98, Natalie Manley (D): Manley’s views on same-sex marriage have not been widely publicized, and she dodged the question on a Patch.com candidate questionnaire. Equality Illinois did not endorse her in 2012.
Tabares is listed because the 13th Ward’s alderman will be leading her defense if she has to run in another primary. No decision had been made about what to do there the last time I checked.
On the others, it’s a district by district thing, but Madigan’s people don’t want to have to spend money that they don’t need to spend. An “OK” by the campaign shop on some of the less risky targets would go a very long way toward passing this bill.
* Related…
* Mark Brown: Legislators’ foot dragging on same-sex marriage has life and death consequences
16 Comments
|
* Congressman Adam Kinzinger has a GOP primary opponent…
On Tuesday, David Hale, founder of the Rockford Tea Party, announced he is running in next March’s GOP primary against Kinzinger, who has been in Congress since 2011.
Over the past week, Kinzinger has made a number of national TV appearances backing President Barack Obama’s call for military action in Syria. The Air Force veteran said he has offered to help Obama make the case.
It was Kinzinger’s position on Syria that prompted Hale to enter the race. […]
He founded the Rockford Tea Party in 2009 and helped organize the petition drive for the Winnebago County Board to pass a concealed carry ordinance, collecting 11,000 signatures. The board ultimately rejected the ordinance.
Amanda Norris, president of the Sauk Valley Tea Party, said she welcomed opponents of Kinzinger, whom she called a “real disappointment.”
“He [Hale] is very passionate and strong-willed. Sometimes that works against you in the political sphere. He’s on the right side of issues,” Norris said.
As an incumbent with nearly $500,000 in his campaign coffers, Kinzinger is the favorite to win.
“The money is an advantage,” Hale said. “I don’t pretend that I’m a formidable candidate as far as publicity and money goes, When it comes to ideas and when it comes to how government works, I’m head and shoulders above Adam Kinzinger.”
* Meanwhile, Secretary of State Jesse White is announcing his reelection tomorrow…
…there is no sign of a Republican challenger on the horizon.
Jayme Odom, executive director of the Illinois Republican Party, said new party chief Jack Dorgan is attempting to draft a candidate.
“The chairman is still talking to multiple people,” Odom said Tuesday.
Republican observers say it’s pretty obvious why no one is jockeying for the position.
“I think you have to admit it would be a tough one to win,” state Sen. Kyle McCarter, R-Lebanon, said Tuesday.
Discuss.
16 Comments
|
Question of the day
Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* How did Barton Lorimor do while I was away?
…Adding… Please, make sure to consider the constraints he was under. He couldn’t blog from work, which limited the time he could spend on the site. I originally asked him to just do one post a day to keep y’all occupied, but he clearly went above and beyond.
45 Comments
|
This is why they can’t have a seat
Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The Illinois Policy Institute and the Better Government Association both have people who “cover” the Statehouse and have applied for seats in the House and Senate press boxes. So far, neither group has received an approval from the two chambers.
Why? Because the groups directly lobby the Legislature. If they were given permission to sit in the press box, then why not AFSCME, or AARP, or the Illinois Chamber? All of those groups (and many, many more) produce extensive reports on the General Assembly’s doings.
* I’ve been thinking about doing a post on this for a while now. And a newspaper “column” by the BGA’s Andy Shaw, which recently appeared in the Sun-Times, reminded me why I should…
Some of the other Springfield legislators who deserve a shout-out for working with us in the last session, even if they didn’t always agree with our watchdog ways, include:
† Sen. Mike Jacobs, who acknowledged the importance of public safety and government accountability by sponsoring a bill to create a zero tolerance alcohol impairment policy for on-duty police officers;
† Sen. Dan Kotowski, who took on conflicts of interest by sponsoring a bill that tightened financial disclosure laws;
† Sen. Daniel Biss, who understood the need for accountability in the criminal justice system by sponsoring a bill requiring law enforcement officials to obtain a warrant to use information collected by drones;
† And the coalition of legislators — Sen. Kwame Raoul, Reps. Mike Zalewski and Scott Drury, and House Speaker Michael Madigan — who recognized the high cost of wrongful convictions, in financial and human terms, is an atrocity that can no longer be tolerated.
Look, it’s nice to see a goo-goo group occasionally congratulate individual legislators for the work they do, even legislators who aren’t exactly known as “reformers.” Usually, all we see is angry broadbrush criticism from those folks.
But you can’t register with the state, lobby for bills and then heap praise on your sponsors in a “column” and expect to get a seat in the press box. It doesn’t work that way.
There’s been some grumblings about a potential lawsuit, but the groups ought to stow their anger and just do what they do and quit trying to be something they clearly are not.
Maybe you disagree. If so, I’d love to hear it.
42 Comments
|
Tying the insiders in knots
Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From the Illinois Policy Institute’s journalist in residence…
In the 1990s, Quinn pushed for a constitutional amendment to create term limits for legislators. But the Illinois Supreme Court threw out the proposal before it could go to the voters.
This past week, however, Quinn came out against a new plan to create term limits for lawmakers, a plan being pushed by Republican gubernatorial candidate Bruce Rauner.
That’s artfully worded, but Quinn still favors term limits. The governor simply questioned whether there was a need for the rest of Rauner’s proposal…
Rauner is circulating petitions to get the issues on the 2014 ballot. That includes making it harder to override a governor’s veto by changing the number of votes needed from three-fifths to two-thirds. He also wants to limit legislators to eight years in office, cut the size of the Senate from 59 members to 41 and expand the House from 118 to 123.
Quinn told reporters Wednesday there’s no need to change the three-fifths vote. […]
Quinn says it’s unnecessary to increase the number of House members.
* Quinn is right about that. Nobody cares about those two issues. In reality, the two proposals were simply a way to get term limits onto the ballot. Eric Zorn doesn’t think it’ll work…
The power of citizens to initiate amendments to the state constitution via petition drive was limited by the framers only “to structural and procedural subjects contained” in Article IV, the one that deals with the legislature [the Illinois Supreme Court ruled in 1994]. […]
So would term limits change the structure of the legislature?
No, the majority ruled in 1994. Even with term limits, “The General Assembly would remain a bicameral legislature consisting of a House and Senate with a total of 177 members, and would maintain the same organization.”
Would it change the procedures of the legislature?
Again, no. “The process by which the General Assembly adopts a law would remain unchanged” with the addition of term limits, said the majority opinion. […]
If, earlier this week when Rauner’s proposal was formally unveiled, you wondered why it included this pair of off-the-radar-screen ideas, now you know: It’s an effort to create a plausible reason for the Supreme Court to give the OK.
“These are three interrelated reforms,” said Mike Schrimpf, a spokesman for Rauner and the term-limits effort. “Taken all together, they make the legislature more responsive to the citizens and they make elections more competitive.”
But, so far anyway, Rauner is the only person offering up an actual plan. So being against a couple of smallish aspects of that plan means it can be spun by the pro-Rauner types (and the Illinois Policy Institute’s honchos are with Rauner) as being “against term limits.” So, advantage Rauner.
* Sen. Kirk Dillard took his opposition a step further…
When asked if term limits is a big issue in Illinois, Dillard said Rauner is “pulling a Pat Quinn.” He says Rauner is pandering to the public on a popular issue.
As for himself, Dillard supports term limits for legislative leaders. He voted for a recall, which he believes sends a better message than term limits. That way, if people want to get rid of an official like Rod Blagojevich, they can get rid of him right away, rather than having to impeach or wait until the next election.
Dillard said the legislative leaders are the problem.
* OK, but this constitutional amendment is already being sold as a way to get rid of Madigan and break the stranglehold of Chicago’s influence….
Rauner’s got a video out to promote his term-limits issue.
It blasts “career politicians” who stay too long in office. And whose pictures roll by on the screen when this discussion is taking place? Senate President John Cullerton, ex-Gov. Rod Blagojevich and House Speaker Michael Madigan, all Chicago Democrats.
The video…
Dillard is on the “wrong” side of this issue, as far as the public is concerned, so he’s gotta revert to name calling. Politically, anyway, this is, again, advantage Rauner.
27 Comments
|
They’re dropping like flies
Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* We’re getting close to a dozen state legislators who’ve announced that they’re not running for reelection or who have already resigned…
State Rep. Naomi Jakobsson, D-Urbana, announced Tuesday night that she will not run for a seventh term in 2014.
And Michael Richards, a Champaign County Board member who managed Jakobsson’s last two campaigns, said he hopes to succeed her in the Illinois House. […]
Richards followed Jakobsson’s email with his own, saying that Jakobsson had asked him to run for the seat representing the 103rd District, which includes almost all of Champaign and Urbana.
“Representative Jakobsson has asked me to run for state representative,” said Richards, a county board member from Champaign and a legislative liaison to the Illinois Emergency Management Agency. “Whomever wins this seat will have big shoes to fill.”
Other candidates in both parties are expected to announce as well.
There was a huge turnover in the first post remap election, but it appears that some legislators wanted to hold onto their respective seats for one more cycle before leaving.
25 Comments
|
House Republicans avoid traditional bloodbath
Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…
After the Illinois House Republicans met late last month in Springfield to elect a new caucus leader, several members gathered at a local watering hole to toast their top dog, Rep. Jim Durkin, R-Western Springs.
Notably, several House Republicans who backed the candidacy of Rep. Raymond Poe, R-Springfield, showed up as well and heartily shared in the festivities.
And so, a leadership battle that for a while looked to be heading down a bitterly negative path ended with smiles all around.
Durkin managed to pull off the impossible.
After the failed 1991 ouster attempt of House GOP Leader Lee Daniels, 11 of the 13 coup plotters fled the House within 2 years, either for the Senate or for other jobs. They had no choice. Retribution was in the air.
When Daniels announced he would be stepping aside 10 years later, a months-long feud erupted between Reps. Tom Cross and Art Tenhouse, with the downstater Tenhouse coming out on the losing end.
The fight got personal and emotional, and lots of members were put in highly uncomfortable positions.
The memories of those fights are strong with those who were around back then, and veterans on both sides have tried to help steer this battle away from the abyss ever since Cross announced that he would be stepping aside and running for state treasurer.
Durkin had a reputation among some of his fellow House Republicans as being aloof and even kind of a jerk – his former Cook County prosecutor tendencies have never completely left him. But Durkin patiently traveled the state, meeting with anybody who would sit down with him, and eventually managed to assuage those fears. As a result, he walked into the caucus meeting with far more than the 24 votes he needed to win.
Poe gave what many members said was the speech of his life during the meeting. Poe passionately argued for peace and unity while putting Durkin’s name into nomination. Durkin was elected by acclamation.
Durkin had been a member of Tom Cross’ leadership team, but he’s much better known as being policy oriented. He’s also politically ambitious. He lost a U.S. Senate race in 2002 to Dick Durbin and chaired both of John McCain’s Illinois presidential campaigns.
Durkin was gearing up for an attorney general bid when Cross blindsided him with his own desire for the office. Durkin almost immediately switched gears and focused on the leadership job, which helped box Cross out and forced him to find another job after Lisa Madigan decided to stay put.
Durkin and his team have promised there will be no retribution. There’s a desperate need for unity in that caucus, and pretty much everybody gets it.
If he can suppress those prosecutorial attitude issues, work harder than he ever has, and stay focused and calm while Madigan rattles his cage, Durkin has what it takes to be an effective leader.
Time will tell, but, so far, this looks like a good move by the House GOP.
24 Comments
|
Governor “suspends” funding for Statehouse rehab
Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* AP…
Gov. Pat Quinn has suspended funding for future renovations at the Capitol, a pricey project that’s already caused embarrassment for financially-shaky Illinois and raised questions about how it was allowed.
The Chicago Democrat told reporters Tuesday that he’s instructed his budget director to hold up appropriations for renovations that are yet to be done.
The state has already spent much of the appropriated $50 million for the west wing. That restoration of the Capitol has already drawn criticism along with finger-pointing. Sparking the outrage has been copper-plated wooden doors costing nearly $670,000 and more than $323,000 for chandeliers.
Quinn blamed Capitol architect J. Richard Alsop III and says he needs to be “reigned in” by the commission he reports to.
* Sun-Times…
While Quinn’s Capital Development Board released funds for the nearly finished phase of Capitol construction, the governor said the state is on the hook for paying for work already completed since construction contracts have already been signed.
“If there are contractors who’d already completed work, we’d have legal obligations to pay those vouchers, or we’d wind up in the Court of Claims. But anything further or additional or what they’re planning for the next wing, I think, should be totally held up until we get this architect under control,” the governor said.
Controversy over the renovation work bubbled up in August when the Sun-Times detailed the project in a front page story and intensified earlier this month when Alsop confirmed that historically-accurate copper-clad doors for three entrances in the Capitol’s west wing cost more than $669,000 — the same price as a luxury executive home in the northwest suburbs.
On Sunday, the Chicago Sun-Times followed up with a report on a pair of maiden sculptures that each cost more than $78,000 and four 300-pound chandeliers hung in one senator’s office that cost another $323,000.
* Tribune…
Quinn’s move is largely symbolic. Most of the $50 million earmarked for rehabilitation work on the west wing of the Statehouse, including sets of copper-plated doors costing nearly $700,000, already has been spent. The governor’s action could prevent shifting other money for planned work on other sections of the building. […]
Quinn maintained that his office does not have the ability to approve or block particular “ingredients” of the renovation. Those decisions, he said, are made by a panel that oversees the Capitol architect, a group appointed by the four Democratic and Republican legislative leaders. Quinn said the group needs to rein in the architect, J. Richard Alsop III. […]
There’s no money set aside for overhauling the Capitol’s north and east wings, but Quinn fears a pot of $250 million involving the Statehouse grounds could be shifted by a panel of lawmakers to finish the project.
So, by reading most of the coverage you’d think all spending was halted. But from the Tribune story, maybe not.
* Quinn made his symbolic move in anticipation of an attack from Bill Daley…
Daley said Quinn should have prevented the expenditure of nearly $670,000 for three sets of copper-plated double doors, $160,000 for sculptures replicating statues that were never in the original capitol building, and $323,000 for four chandeliers.
He said those costs are significant, even if a tiny fraction of the overall cost.
“Some people may scoff at it and say, ‘Well, $700,000 out of $50 million, or whatever the renovation is, big deal.’ You know, the average person says that is a big deal,” Daley said. “And until we’re sensitive to them, we’re just going to roll over and say, ‘Well, what the heck, it’s going to last 100 years these doors, and they’re beautiful, and they’re copper, and how could you be against them?’ That’s crazy.”
Daley said people are just numb to continuing expenditures by government officials spending other people’s money.
Voters can get their minds around $700,000 doors pretty easily, so this was an easy shot by Daley. But Quinn really couldn’t have stopped those doors from being installed.
* Republican Sen. Kirk Dillard, also a gubernatorial candidate, jumped into the fray…
Illinois Republican gubernatorial candidate Kirk Dillard and his running mate State Representative Jil Tracy announced Tuesday they will introduce joint resolutions calling on the Illinois Auditor General to investigate expenditures of the Illinois State Capitol West Wing renovations and whether the expenditures were appropriate. This comes after news reports, including one on WMBD TV and Fox 43 that about $700,000 was spent on three pairs of new doors. Tracy says taxpayers need to know their tax dollars are spent wisely.
* Ironically, Dillard was recently endorsed by former Gov. Jim Thompson, who made it obvious that he doesn’t think much of the political fallout…
“Where were they supposed to buy the doors, and maidens and chandeliers?” he asked. “Walmart, Lowe’s?”
“The Capitol,” he said, “is the most significant building in the state of Illinois. . . . All they’re doing with the doors and the maidens is putting the Capitol back to what it was when it was constructed. . . . These items are part of a $50 million capital expenditure…as part of a health and safety renovation. . . . These are capital funds, not operating funds. They can’t be used for services, for example, for senior citizens or developmentally disabled young people.”
Thompson characterized the six-figure price tags as “not only historically correct,” but also, in the long run, a “bargain,” because “the chandeliers and the maidens and the doors will last over one hundred years.” He added, hyperbolically, “In every other state in the union, [public officials] go to great lengths to retain authenticity.”
I asked him if he was surprised that politicians, including Gov. Pat Quinn and the republican candidate striving to take Quinn’s job, State Treasurer Dan Rutherford, are publicly denouncing the expenditures. “No it’s typical,” he said in a weary tone. “The press writes these stories front page, . . . politicians react. I’ve seen it all before.”
56 Comments
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|