Caption contest!
Wednesday, Aug 7, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* As you already know, Gov. Pat Quinn attended yesterday’s court hearing over the challenge to his legislative salary veto. From the Trib…
Keep it clean, folks.
Funniest commenter wins a free Illinois State Fair beverage with yours truly.
* Yesterday’s winner was OneMan…
The winner of Governor Quinn’s I’ll appoint the person closest to me at 12:47 PM to run a state department contest celebrates her good fortune.
151 Comments
|
Question of the day
Wednesday, Aug 7, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From Kurt Erickson…
In agreeing to hire a former aide to Gov. Pat Quinn to lobby on its behalf, the town of Normal on Monday joined an estimated 140 other units of local government using tax money to try and gain a toehold in the Capitol.
According to a study by the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform, local governments and public agencies in Illinois spent more than $7.4 million on outside help in 2010 to try and heighten their profiles and gain better access to the policymakers in the Statehouse.
David Morrison, acting director of the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform, said he launched the study thinking that lobbyists for local governments were unneeded because local state lawmakers would be looking out for the communities in their districts.
But, he said, there are some factors that appear to make it a reasonable expense for some local governments.
For example, a city may be represented by two Republicans at a time when Democrats control state government.
“A city may think they need to hire someone in order to get face time with the people in charge,” Morrison said.
* The Question: Do you think hiring Statehouse lobbyists can benefit many local governments, or is it mostly a waste of taxpayer money? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
online surveys
51 Comments
|
Excuses, excuses
Wednesday, Aug 7, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Yikes…
A month after reporting that Southern Illinois University had lost 257 computers in 2012, Auditor General Bill Holland found a similar situation within the state’s sprawling adult and youth prison systems.
In audits released Tuesday, Holland said 156 computers were deemed “lost” at the Illinois Department of Corrections, and another 84 were unaccounted for at the Illinois Department of Juvenile Justice.
The loss of 240 more state-owned computers within the state’s penal systems is problematic, Holland said.
* The DoC was rather blasé about the whole thing…
According to a new audit,there’s a risk confidential information stored on the computers could be exposed.
But D.O.C. spokesman Tom Shaer says that’s not likely.
“We don’t believe that these computers are laying around somewhere compromising security.”
Shaer says per the audit’s recommendation, the department is working to track them down.
“We’ll show, we believe, that these computers are either still in inventory and possibly service. Or were properly wiped clean, no security risk with information, and were discarded or properly disposed of. We just didn’t complete the paperwork due to human error during a time when the department was short-staffed. And it still is short-staffed.”
Shaer’s “explanation” is what a citizen might call “typical stupid government.”
Meh, so we lost some computers. I’m sure there’s no problem. Don’t worry. Trust us, they’re around here someplace. We’ll find them, just as soon as we get more money to hire more people.
Good managers find a way to make do with less. Bad managers blame budget cuts for everything that goes wrong.
42 Comments
|
The juvenile banana republicans strike again
Wednesday, Aug 7, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Another day, another ill-informed, adolescent temper tantrum over pension reform from the Chicago Tribune editorial board…
There’s a conference committee of House and Senate members working on a solution. If all the legislators on that committee were serious — we know some of them are — they would have crafted a bill by now to present to the public and the governor.
But they haven’t done so. Some members of the committee appear to be in no hurry, especially now that Quinn has taken away their paychecks. They’ll show him! They’ll … just … keep … stalling.
Most exasperating is the slow-walk on pension reform by the conference committee’s chairman, Sen. Kwame Raoul. Not that Raoul hasn’t been busy … sizing up a run for governor. Gov. Raoul — excuse us, Sen. Raoul — your handling of this conference committee isn’t building confidence in your case for a political promotion.
The state’s pension liability grows by $5 million every day. Debt is piling up, up, up.
The committee has to produce a substantial bill, one that comes close to the $187 billion in savings promised by the pension reform bill that passed the Illinois House but was crushed in the Senate.
What’s it going to take? We’ve even come to miss Squeezy the Pension Python, the cartoon character that Quinn created to try to prod the legislators to own up to the disaster they’ve created. Where’s Squeezy, trapped in a smoke-filled room in the Capitol? Lured to the beach for bikini gazing and Mai Tais? Maybe he joined the conference committee — a guarantee that he would never be seen again.
Only the We Are One negotiated pension plan could receive three-fifths votes in both chambers to give any pension reform bill an immediate effective date. Otherwise, we’re looking at July 1, 2014 for an effective date on a simple majority roll call But to hear the Tribune tell it, we’ll drown if something isn’t done right this very second!!!
These people write like they’re tweenie girls whose parents won’t buy them One Direction concert tickets.
Take. A. Breath.
* Also, if they’d bothered to actually check, they’d know that the conference committee is actually making lots of progress. What’s the holdup? Well, every tweak they make has to be sent off for actuarial analysis, and that takes time.
Again.
Take. A. Breath.
* And I seriously doubt that Sen. Raoul cares whether the Tribune thinks he’s gubernatorial material. Threatening the guy ain’t gonna work.
* Also, too, the Tribune has proved over and over again that it has zero concerns for the state Constitution. Perhaps their editorial board members have moved to another state. I dunno. But pension reform is made extremely difficult because of our Constitution. And the obvious separation of powers questions raised by the governor’s veto seem not to bother the Trib, either.
They just want those concert tickets, man, and they don’t care how it’s done. Missing Squeezy? C’mon. Grow up, already.
[And for my more partisan commenters, please note that the word “republicans” in the headline is not capitalized.]
58 Comments
|
* RTA Chairman John Gates piled on against Frank Zuccarelli’s CTA appointment late yesterday in a letter to Gov. Pat Quinn…
Gates said Zuccarelli’s dual roles on the CTA board while serving as Thornton Township supervisor violate “the intent of Section 19” of the Metropolitan Transit Authority Act.
Zuccarelli makes more than $100,000 a year in his role as Thornton Township Supervisor, according to a report by the Better Government Association.
Gates urged Quinn to withdraw Zucarrelli’s nomination.
The full letter is here. Make sure to read it.
* The governor’s office is refusing to back down…
Quinn’s office responded Tuesday night, saying that the state law in question wouldn’t prevent Zuccarelli from serving in both positions.
Zuccarelli has no transportation background, but his appointment could help Quinn. Thornton Township has a long history of turning out Democratic votes in Cook County.
Zuccarelli was appointed in early June. The political benefit at the time was obvious. He is a campaign powerhouse with thousands of African-American votes and Quinn desperately needed his support if Lisa Madigan decided to run.
So, Zucc got the nod.
And now… Oops.
The problem here is that Quinn loves to cover himself with a reformer’s coat. But when it comes to patronage, that coat covers something quite different. We’ve discussed this before.
…Adding… Best comment so far…
The idea that Gates — who put Madigan’s son in law on his payroll — would lecture anybody about “transparency” and “integrity” is the joke of the day.
Heh.
True.
* Meanwhile…
Kane County’s representative on the Regional Transportation Authority is stepping down amid concerns he can’t legally serve both on the transit agency and a state commission.
Nabi Fakroddin sits on the RTA board and the Illinois Human Rights Commission.
Advertisement
RTA Chairman John S. Gates Jr. wrote Gov. Pat Quinn Thursday saying that an internal review turned up the dual roles. “It is my belief that according to the law, it may not be permissible for (Fakroddin) to continue to serve on the RTA and Mr. Fakroddin agreed,” Gates wrote.
Quinn appoints members of the human rights commission.
20 Comments
|
* From a press release…
“Before a friendly audience behind closed doors in March, Ty Fahner claimed credit for driving down the state’s bond rating–and thereby raising costs to all taxpayers. Now, under growing public scrutiny, he says that wasn’t true.
“Fahner’s delayed attempt to deny that those efforts took place results in more questions than answers. If there’s nothing to hide, why is he trying to backtrack now? Why would he mislead the public in the first place?
“Did members of the Civic Committee speak to the ratings agencies — as Fahner clearly stated initially? If so, what transpired? Did any Civic Committee members profit from these actions? How did the role of Fahner’s law firm as state bond counsel and the role of many Civic Committee members as bond underwriters impact their efforts to lobby to reduce the state’s rating?
“Ultimately, which story should the public believe? Every Illinoisan deserves to know what really happened. We urge elected officials and the news media to demand answers to these lingering questions, uncover what occurred, and examine whether formal consequences are warranted.”
Investigation needed or no?
95 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
* This may be a politically dumb move in a Democratic primary, but give him props for saying what he believes…
Democratic gubernatorial hopeful Bill Daley is calling on Gov. Pat Quinn to withdraw his appointment of a powerful south suburban Democratic leader to the Chicago Transit Authority board.
“The only transportation experience Frank Zuccarelli has is walking people to the polling place,” Mr. Daley told me, responding to my story this morning about how, thanks to Mr. Quinn, Mr. Zuccarelli will be able to benefit from a double-dip loophole in state law.
“It’s the same old Springfield game. It’s been like this for 12 years, first under (convicted ex-Gov. Rod) Blagojevich and now under Quinn,” Mr. Daley said in a phone interview. “Here we have a transportation crisis, he just appointed a blue-ribbon panel to review transit, and he goes and does this sort of thing.” […]
Mr. Daley said he is not worried Mr. Zuccarelli heads a large and influential political organization, serving as Democratic committeeman in Thornton.
“I’ll worry about the election next March,” Mr. Daley said. “Someone needs to worry about the transportation system and the credibility of government.”
Yikes.
Background here.
* Bruce Rauner also responded…
“I’d call this is a blatant insult to every taxpayer, but it’s clear Pat Quinn and the Democratic machine don’t care about the taxpayers at all,” Mr. Rauner says in a statement. “In fact, there is now a pattern of Pat Quinn handing out taxpayer-funded salaries and benefits to key cogs in the Democratic machine. This is exactly why voters are eager for a governor who can’t be intimidated or influenced by the special interests and political machines that try to control politics in Illinois.”
43 Comments
|
Question of the day
Tuesday, Aug 6, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Politico…
Former White House chief of staff Bill Daley is featuring a White House photo of the day Osama bin Laden was killed and touting his “key role” in the operation as an example of leadership in his campaign for governor of Illinois.
On his campaign website, a link just above “donate today” reads: “This is what leadership looks like.” When users click, it brings full screen the official White House photo of the Situation Room on May 1, 2011, where President Barack Obama’s national security team is getting an update on the mission to kill bin Laden.
The caption on Daley’s website reads: “As President Obama’s Chief of Staff, Bill played a key role in the operation that captured Osama bin Laden.” […]
In the bio section of his site, Daley highlights his stint in the Obama administration from January 2011-January 2012, saying Daley “was involved in all aspects and issues faced by the president and the administration, both domestic and foreign.”
* The iconic photo…
* The Question: Will Bill Daley’s involvement with the killing of Osama bin Laden be significantly persuasive in the Democratic gubernatorial primary race? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
online survey
75 Comments
|
*** UPDATED x1 *** Quinn the reformer
Tuesday, Aug 6, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Gov. Pat Quinn has railed at politics eroding public confidence in the Chicago area’s mass transit agencies. Yesterday, he proposed a blue-ribbon panel to propose ways to clean things up.
But check out this fascinating twist from his recent appointment of Thornton Township Supervisor Frank Frank Zuccarelli to the CTA’s board…
Brad O’Halloran recently resigned as chairman of the Metra board, at least in part because of reports that he’d violated state law by accepting compensation both as a Metra board member and as an Orland Park village trustee.
But Mr. Zuccarelli is different. At least, so says Mr. Quinn’s office.
The state law establishing the CTA says that “no member” of the CTA board “shall hold any other office or employment under the federal, state or any county or municipal government except an honorary office without compensation or an office in the National Guard.”
But Grant Klinzman, a spokesman for Mr. Quinn, cites a different provision of law, which says: “‘Municipal’ or ‘municipality’ does not include a township, town when used as the equivalent of a township, incorporated town that has superseded a civil township . . . or any other similar governmental district.”
“The statute prohibits anyone who is paid by a municipality, county or state government (not a township),” Mr. Kinzman said in a statement. “Supervisor Frank Zuccarelli is an elected leader and strong advocate of a region that is quickly growing . . . (and) will be made significantly more accessible to public transportation by the proposed Red Line extension.”
Zuccarelli is also the local township Democratic committeeman and his township has the highest Democratic turnout in suburban Cook County. Zuccarelli was looking for another second job after Toni Preckwinkle let him go from a part-time county post, so the Quinn appointment was seen at the time as a way to help lock in the Z-Team’s support for the governor next spring. Now, it could backfire on Quinn.
Oops.
*** UPDATE *** Greg Hinz updates…
State Rep. Jack Franks, D-Woodstock, a longtime critic of how public transit operates here, is ripping the double-dip, and says he’ll try to make it illegal.
“The governor is basing his decision on a technicality, to help a political operative,” said Mr. Franks in a phone call. Before making “a political move,” Mr. Franks acerbically added, “I’m sure the governor did a nationwide search to find the best candidate.”
Mr. Franks says a pending bill of his would close the “township loophole” for a variety of posts. But he now intends to submit separate legislation aimed specifically at those who hold both transit agency and township-paying jobs.
GOP gubernatorial hopeful Kirk Dillard also has words for Mr. Quinn, telling him to withdraw the Zuccarelli appointment.
“This is hypocrisy beyond belief,” Mr. Dillard told me. “Gov. Quinn’s appointment of a political insider may technically be legal, but it sure is a total violation of the spirit of the law” — particularly at a time when the mess at Metra has shaken public confidence in public transit generally, he added. “At a time when one in 10 Illinoisans is out of work, (Mr Zuccarelli) is on multiple payrolls.”
53 Comments
|
ALEC to be met with Chicago protests
Tuesday, Aug 6, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The American Legislative Exchange Council is meeting in Chicago this week to celebrate its 40th anniversary, and opposition groups are gearing up. From a Common Cause and Center for Media and Democracy press release…
The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is running a secretive, multi-million dollar slush fund that finances lavish trips for state legislators and has misled the Internal Revenue Service about the fund’s activity, two government watchdog groups charged today.
Common Cause and the Center for Media and Democracy said the “scholarship fund” scheme also raises serious questions about ALEC’s compliance with state gift and disclosure laws, and the ethics of lawmakers who accept ALEC’s travel payments.
The watchdogs said that by funneling money through ALEC, that group’s corporate sponsors are able to take a federal tax deduction for the cost of wining, dining and housing lawmakers and their families at resorts and events like ALEC’s 40th anniversary meeting this week at Chicago’s posh Palmer House Hilton (August 7-9). Meanwhile, ALEC conceals the sources of the funds from the public and hides the amount of spending from the IRS by claiming that it only holds the funds in “trust,” while writing lawmakers’ checks to cover their trips.
Common Cause and CMD laid out details of the fund’s operation in an IRS tax whistleblower complaint and letter to the IRS Commissioner.
The groups have built their case based on documents obtained through open records requests, and are taking a number of actions this week to urge a crackdown on the ALEC
The IRS tax whistleblower complaint is here. The letter to the IRS Commissioner is here. An investigative report, Buying Influence, is here.
* A protest is planned for Thursday. From a Center for Media and Democracy press release…
According to ALEC, up to 2,000 state legislators and lobbyists are expected to be meeting behind closed doors inside the Palmer House Hilton in downtown Chicago. Although ALEC’s leaders have told the press its meetings are open to the public, reporters have been blocked from meetings where corporations and politicians vote as equals, bounced from other meetings, denied credentials, and even threatened with arrest.
In its latest move to shield its activities from pubic scrutiny, ALEC has begun stamping legislation and materials it gives to lawmakers as exempt from state open records laws. It has also resorted to using a drop box service Box.com in an attempt to evade legislators’ open records obligations. CMD is litigating this issue in Wisconsin in a suit against ALEC’s National Treasurer. Read more here.
Outside the ALEC conference, protests are planned for noon on August 8, led by the Chicago Federation of Labor.
* For background, this is from a December, 2012 Bloomberg report…
ALEC this week released its 2013 state legislative priorities and proposed legislation to accomplish them, including ending traditional pensions for newly hired public employees, repealing requirements that utilities buy electricity from environmentally friendly sources, using taxpayer dollars for religious schools, and limiting lawsuits by consumers injured by faulty products.
There was a small protest at the Palmer House yesterday and a handful of people were arrested. The big event is Thursday. Fred Klonsky has video.
16 Comments
|
Fahner: “I misspoke”
Tuesday, Aug 6, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From an e-mail I received yesterday from Civic Committee President Ty Fahner…
Regarding my comments at the Union League Club in March, I misspoke.
First, while I may have said so, I didn’t call the ratings agencies, nor did any of our Civic Committee staff. My response to the questions was very confusing and inarticulate. If you notice, at the end of my answer, I close by saying it wouldn’t be the responsible thing for me to have done so with our members being the state’s largest employers. But I did say it.
He misspoke? That’s a pretty long story for a simple misspeak. Here’s the complete Fahner quote…
“The Civic Committee, not me, but me and some of the people that make up the Civic Committee, some of the same names I mentioned before, did meet with and call, in one case it was in person, a couple of calls to Moody’s, Fitch and Standard & Poor’s, and say, ‘How in the hell can you guys do this? You’re an enabler to let the state continue. You keep threatening more and more and more.’
“And I think now we’ve backed off, because we don’t want to be the straw that breaks the back, But if you watch what happened over the last few years, it’s been steadily down. Before that, it’s been the blind eye, and that’s a whole different topic, as you know, about how the rating agencies act and don’t act. That’s more in your field and stuff. It has been irresponsible. We have told them that we thought they were being irresponsible, but we stopped that a couple months ago. I do know that we suggested that they talk to the governor, the governor’s staff to see if he could give them comfort on where the state was going, and I think that’s one of the reasons why we’re really close now. I hope we’re close.”
“Inarticulate,” maybe, but not really confusing. He said what he said, and it was pretty darned detailed.
* Anyway, Fahner told me nobody from staff spoke with the ratings agencies, so I followed up with a question about whether any Civic Committee members had meetings and here’s his e-mailed response…
Rich, to be clear, I am not aware of anyone connected with the civic committee that contacted the rating agencies to urge Illinois be downgraded or for any other reason.
So, he made the story up out of whole cloth? And this guy is running the most powerful business group in Illinois?
* Back to Fahner’s original e-mail…
Finally, if there’s any good news in this, it’s that even a cynical political columnist like you now cares about pension reform, something we’ve been screaming about for a while now. We appreciate that. Stay on it. Illinois is in critical condition and we need everybody’s hands on deck.
Whatever.
105 Comments
|
* Sun-Times…
Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s office confirmed Monday it will have a direct role in the legal dispute over Gov. Pat Quinn’s move to cut legislative salaries despite the fact her father, House Speaker Michael Madigan, is a plaintiff in the case.
The three-term attorney general will represent Republican Comptroller Judy Baar Topinka in the case that pits her and Quinn against the House speaker and Senate President John Cullerton (D-Chicago), who sued the governor and comptroller.
“There’s not a conflict of interest because of the familial relationship,” said Natalie Bauer, a spokeswoman for the attorney general. Cullerton and Speaker Madigan “filed in their official capacity as the legislative leaders, so there is no conflict.”
The case is scheduled for its first hearing Tuesday before Cook County Associate Judge Neil Cohen, who is being asked to grant a preliminary injunction that would set aside Quinn’s line-item veto and authorize Topinka to resume paying legislators, who missed their first paychecks last week.
The motion for a preliminary injunction is here. The governor’s general counsel was served with the papers as well.
*** UPDATE *** From the Twitters…
Keep an eye on our live feed for more updates.
*** UPDATE 2 *** Twitters…
That means two paychecks will be missed and likely no pension reform until after Sept. 18th unless they can somehow convince the judge to issue an order beforehand.
53 Comments
|
Caption contest!
Tuesday, Aug 6, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a recent bill signing event…
Now, y’all know that I really don’t like violent imagery in comments, so make sure you don’t get weird on me today. Take it easy. Thanks.
Funniest commenter wins a beverage with yours truly at the Illinois State Fair.
* Yesterday’s winner was Arthur Andersen…
“Forget Chicago, just gimme that countryside”
69 Comments
|
* Sun-Times…
Governor Pat Quinn today said he is preparing to appoint an independent panel of experts to offer ways to restructure the RTA and scandal-ridden Metra.
“I am anxious to work on a fundamental overhaul of Metra and the RTA,” Quinn said at a news conference. The governor had signed three bills today strengthening traffic safety.
Quinn hasn’t appointed the panel members yet but mentioned the names Ann Schneider and George Ranney as possibilities.
Quinn said he would take recommendations from an inspector general’s report — which is still under way — as well as from the new panel.
The governor, who has in the past called for a new Metra board, said he will give legislators an overhaul proposal by Oct. 22.
* Tribune…
The governor would not say when he plans to officially name the group, but said he hopes they can begin working soon in order to produce suggestions for lawmakers to act on when they are scheduled to return to the Capitol in October. Quinn said he thinks the panel would be able to do its work at the same time the inspector general’s office is looking in to any potential wrongdoing without compromising that investigation.
Just like pension reform. Craft a solution before getting the full analysis back.
* More Trib…
Still, creating a group to take on the Metra scandal could play well in mailers and advertisements as Quinn runs for re-election next year.
That might work, except Gov. Quinn believes direct mail is a complete waste of money and won’t send it.
24 Comments
|
The stonewalling continues
Monday, Aug 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Progress Illinois tried to do a follow-up to the coverage of Ty Fahner’s comments that he and members of the powerful Civic Committee met with ratings agencies in an apparent attempt to jaw down Illinois’ credit ratings.
The PI folks didn’t get very far. Those refusing comment included…
* Gov. Pat Quinn
* The Civic Committee
* Fitch Ratings
* Moody’s Investors Services
* Standard & Poor’s
* From their story…
(T)he government has an “obligation to shine some light” on the Civic Committee’s apparent lobbying of the three main credit rating agencies to ensure no illegal activity occurred and that “these corporate giants didn’t profit in some way by this back-room phone calling,” said Bill Looby, a spokesman with Illinois AFL-CIO.
“This is wrong on a lot of different levels,” Looby continued. “If it’s not illegal, it should be. And we should find out what happened, and who did it, and how it was accomplished, and whether or not there was anyone that benefited from it.”
Overall, Lindall says it is “repulsive” to see Fahner furthering the Civic Committee’s “misinformation campaign” to portray the modest and well-deserved $32,000 average pension of a retired employee as “what’s wrong with state government.”
“It goes much further when it appears that, by their own admission, these tremendously powerful CEOs and lobbyists are working behind closed doors to manipulate the creditworthiness, and therefore the cost to taxpayers of the state and the people of Illinois,” he said.
37 Comments
|
Today’s best e-mail
Monday, Aug 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a press release…
On Tuesday, August 6, State Representative Jeanne Ives will host a Health and Fitness Boot Camp for children in her district. The event will be held at Cantigny Park, 1S151 Winfield Rd., Winfield, IL from 9am to noon.
When asked how she came up with the idea to conduct a boot camp, Representative Ives stated that, “Long ago, I recognized that children have a great deal of natural energy and are drawn to physical activity and events that challenge them. I certainly enjoyed the physical fitness challenges in my Army training. This camp is designed to let kids see how well they can complete some fun, age-appropriate fitness tests. I have hosted similar events for my own children and their friends and I wanted to broaden these activities to a wider group.”
State Representative Jeanne Ives (R-Wheaton) is a West Point Graduate who served in the United States Army and comes from a family for whom military service is a tradition.
It is free and open to all who wish to attend.
What Boot Camp Will Look Like:
· At 0900 (9:00 a.m.): Recruits will be signed in, currently 70 children, ages 3-12, have enlisted.
· Rep. Ives will lead the way, completing the fitness test, obstacle course, climbing wall, and BMI testing
· Recruits will:
o Complete an Obstacle Course by FTX Crossfit
o Scale a Climbing Wall
o Participate in a Fitness Test
o Earn personalized, commemorative dog tags
o Receive BMI testing and learn safe stretching from Advanced Healthcare Associates
o Take part in basic First Aid Instruction from Cadence Health and Edward Hospital
o Join in activities and presentations on proper nutrition from Juice Plus and FORWARD of DuPage County
o Receive samples of healthy snacks from Whole Foods
· At 1200 (12:00 p.m.): Recruits will be dismissed.
· Rep. Ives will be available to speak with media before and after the event.
You gotta love the “commemorative dog tags” part. But I sure hope that Sgt Hartman from “Full Metal Jacket” doesn’t show up.
43 Comments
|
*** UPDATED x1 *** Question of the day
Monday, Aug 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I’m not sure I’ve ever seen anybody campaign for governor in short pants with an untucked, long-sleeved, button-down collar blue business shirt. Bill Daley recently notified the world via Twitter that he was “In Woodstock IL at the McHenry County Fair“…
Click the pic for a larger image.
Wow.
* The Question: Caption?
Funniest commenter wins a free beverage at the Illinois State Fair - likely not in combination with a golf cart ride (oops).
Last week’s winner was Calhoun Native…
There’s only one me in Metra.
CN should contact me via email so we can work out our beverage time.
*** UPDATE *** Daley just called, and after saying he wore the beat-up shoes he wears every day, he joked that he was wearing black wingtips.
Like his father and his brothers, he doesn’t always finish his sentences, so while he was joking about his attire, he said “I get it, but I am not gonna play…. I’m not going to suddenly be Bruce Rauner and try to be…” You get the idea. He’s not gonna do the costume thing. OK, all respect, I guess.
After he hung up, he called back to ask “What if I tied a red bandana around my neck?”
He does have a good sense of humor. I’ll give him that. He also answered questions about the FERC stuff from another post today. Check that one in a bit.
124 Comments
|
No immediate concealed carry ruling
Monday, Aug 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The 7th Circuit will hear the case, but it hasn’t yet schedule any arguments, so this could take a while…
A Chicago federal appeals court isn’t letting Illinoisans immediately tote firearms in public under the state’s fledging concealed-carry law, but says it will give the matter a speedy review.
The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last week turned down the emergency injunction request by gun-rights advocates who wanted Illinois gun owners to be able carry concealed weapons now instead of waiting months for the permitting process to be set up.
Mary Shepard and the Illinois State Rifle Association say the wait is unreasonable and unconstitutional.
16 Comments
|
* Phil Bradley writes that he won’t be supporting Bruce Rauner. One reason: Rauner wants to start at the top…
My work in government and my campaigning for and holding public office taught me many things that are unknown by most who haven’t paid their dues by being involved.
I remember my first run for the Lincoln Land Community College board. I put up yard signs all over several counties, met the editors of all the papers, sent out mailings and spent time in many small towns shaking hands. In those days few people had even heard of the college. Fewer still knew it was run by an elected board. And no one had heard of me.
But in a grubby little bar in Ashland, I walked up to a disheveled, grizzled guy, shook his hand and asked for his vote. And learned more than any political science class ever taught me.
“How do you feel about the semester system?” the man asked. Totally unexpected. (At the time, Lincoln Land was considering changing from a quarterly calendar to semesters.)
What followed was a long conversation about academic calendars and how the change would benefit his work schedule and his ability to get the degree in agriculture that his future job depended on.
Right there I understood that what government does affects people’s lives in big ways.
In fact, what I praise is experience. As a candidate, as an officeholder, as someone doing the day-to-day work of government, one builds experience. You learn that many different people have many different ideas. That you need to listen. You need to understand. You need to compromise.
You learn that there are few easy answers, no quick answers. And sometimes there aren’t right answers, just better ones.
I totally get Phil’s point, which has been made one way or another by several commenters here over the past few months.
But Rauner has been traveling Illinois, so give him credit for trying. And I don’t think that everybody always has to run for a lower job first.
Adlai Stevenson, II held some appointed US government positions before he was elected governor. And he was a good governor. Jim Thompson was a US Attorney before he was elected governor. I think he was one of our best governors.
Is experience with grassroots campaigning helpful? Yep. No doubt. But there is something to be said for a fresh face.
Then again, Dan Walker was a fresh face who’d never been elected to anything before he won his gubernatorial campaign, and we know how that turned out.
So, also, beware. Everybody’s different.
* Speaking of Walker, I excerpted this 1980 Illinois Issues story last week…
Walker was accused of attempting to disguise how he had expanded the number of employees in the governor’s office because of his campaign pledge not to do so.
Pat Quinn was one of those guys who Walker sneaked onto the payroll.
Governors do this sort of thing all the time, of course. And it continues under Quinn, who constantly boasts about trimming his own office budget.
For example, this is from the Illinois Civil Service Commission’s May, 2013 report…
As to Item E, this request is for a Legislative Liaison or Legislative Staff Person at the Department of Children and Family Services, a position that reports to the Chief Legislative Liaison who reports to the Director. The position description contains
language that this position will be performing “back office” responsibilities in the agency’s legislative office as well as more traditional legislative liaison responsibilities. Staff had a concern because historically the Commission has indicated it would not
extend principal policy exemptions to positions in the legislative office that perform administrative duties. However, a check of this position description to other already exempt legislative liaison positions in the agency revealed that they are, for the most part, similar. The agency has also indicated that this position has not been included in any bargaining unit. For those reasons, Staff recommended approval of this request provided the Commissioners are comfortable with the agency having six Section 4d(3) exempt legislative liaison positions. Commissioner Krey inquired whether any of the legislative liaison positions are vacant. Michelle Jackson indicated they were not.
Commissioner Cummings inquired why the agency needs six legislative liaisons as five seems excessive. Michelle Jackson replied that two of the positions are currently assigned to the Governor’s Office by Interagency Agreement, doing similar work on behalf of the agency as well as multiple other agencies. Chairman FitzGerald inquired which agencies were involved. Michelle Jackson indicated she was unsure which specific agencies were involved.
Emphasis added.
* And this June, 2013 Civil Service Commission report, pointed to by a commenter last week, looks a tad suspicious as well…
As to Item F, this request is for a Legislative Liaison at the Department of Public Health, a position that reports to the Deputy Director who reports to the Director. This was also continued from last month due to concerns over whether it was simply performing clerical work or true liaison responsibilities. The agency submitted a clarified position description which confirmed the latter so Staff recommended approval of this request since it is presently excluded from a collective bargaining unit and so long as the Commission is comfortable with the agency having six exempt legislative liaisons. Commissioner Krey inquired how many of these were presently filled. Executive Director Stralka responded that his best recall was four of the six were occupied.
IDPH has six liaison positions? Six?
…Adding… I meant to put this here and forgot. Bill Daley, of course, has never been elected to anything. So, his past associations need to come under strong scrutiny. For example…
U.S. energy regulators are accusing JPMorgan Chase & Co. of manipulating electricity prices in California and the Midwest in 2010 and 2011.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission said in an enforcement notice Monday that the bank used improper bidding strategies to squeeze excessive payments from the agencies that run the power grids in California and the Midwest.
This happened during Daley’s tenure at JPMorgan Chase. The bank settled…
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) today approved a stipulation and consent agreement under which JP Morgan Ventures Energy Corporation (JPMVEC) will pay $410 million in penalties and disgorgement to ratepayers for allegations of market manipulation stemming from the company’s bidding activities in electricity markets in California and the Midwest from September 2010 through November 2012.
Under the agreement, JPMVEC will pay a civil penalty of $285 million to the U.S. Treasury and disgorge $125 million in unjust profits. The first $124 million of the disgorged profits will go to ratepayers in the California Independent System Operator (California ISO), which operates the California electricity market. The other $1 million will go to ratepayers in the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO).
The Midcontinent Independent System Operator includes Ameren’s Illinois territory. So, while there wasn’t a huge disgorgement for the Midwest, it was still something and it impacted Illinois and, therefore, could very well come up against Daley in the spring primary campaign.
*** UPDATE *** Daley called and made something clear: “I wasn’t involved in the trading business in any way shape or form,” adding that he hadn’t yet read the FERC complaint or details of the settlement. He said he was mainly aware that JPMorgan Chase was involved in the electric trading business through media reports.
It was, I’m pretty sure, way out of his purview. But it was still his company, so it’s probably fair game in a campaign.
* Related…
* GOP candidate Rauner visits Lakewood: “I don’t think there should be tenure in the schools,” Rauner said. “That doesn’t exist anywhere else in our society. If you’re a good teacher, you should get rewarded. If you’re an ineffective teacher, you should be helped and try to improve. But if you don’t improve, do a different career.”
* Governor candidate Rauner talks jobs creation, pensions in Aurora: “I’m not a politician, I’ve never run for office,” he said. “I didn’t even run for student council in high school.”
* GOP governor candidates make a stop in Elburn: Rauner said his business background as a venture capitalist will help run government more like a business.
38 Comments
|
* AP…
Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn says Wisconsin should follow the lead of other Midwest states and legalize gay marriage.
Quinn said Aug. 3 during a break at the National Governors Association meeting in Milwaukee that gay people should not have more rights in some states in the region and less in others.
Gay marriage became legal this week in Minnesota. Quinn says he would sign a bill to legalize gay marriage in Illinois, but it is tied up in the Legislature.
He called on Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and the Republican-controlled Legislature to follow the lead of those states.
Dude, how about focusing on passing the Illinois bill first?
*** UPDATE *** The governor was asked about his comments today. Listen to his response…
29 Comments
|
Daley blames Quinn for gay marriage failure
Monday, Aug 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Bill Daley has a new “Issues” section on his updated campaign website. Here’s some of his take on gay marriage…
One of the most unjust failures of Governor Quinn administration is the failure of Illinois to pass Marriage Equality, even though we have big Democratic majorities in both the State Senate and House.
Just days before the vote in the House, President Obama was in Chicago. Yet Governor Quinn failed to use this opportunity to have the President, a powerful voice on marriage equality, sit down with wavering legislators to get the votes we need to join 13 other states who have passed laws that recognize the simple idea that love is love.
I’m not sure you can blame that all on Quinn. Daley was Obama’s former chief of staff, as was Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who said gay marriage was one of his top three legislative priorities this year.
31 Comments
|
* From a June, 2013 report by the generally anti-tax Heartland Institute…
Cigarette tax revenue in Illinois is falling far short of the amount projected last year, state officials say.
In May of 2012, state legislators approved a $1-per-pack increase on the price of cigarettes, nearly doubling the state’s tax rate to $1.98 per pack, the 17th-highest state tax rate in the nation. However, the tax delivered only $212 million of the expected $350 million for the fiscal year ended June 30.
Governor Pat Quinn (D) said the cigarette tax increase would help sustain the state’s Medicaid program, as well as the School Infrastructure Fund, while also discouraging smoking. But The Heartland Institute, Illinois Policy Institute and other public policy groups predicted the state would fail to receive the projected increase in tax revenue. They noted the likelihood that consumers would try to avoid the tax by buying cigarettes out of state, where taxes are lower.
* Also from June, we have this from the Illinois Policy Institute…
Remember when the state of Illinois said its new $1 cigarette tax would bring in $350 million in additional revenue?
Unless this tax garners an additional $138 million in the next 10 days, these lofty projections are about to crash and burn.
The cigarette tax hike, which took effect a year ago this month, is only on track to bring in $212 million in revenue for the current fiscal year that ends June 30, according to a report from the Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability, or COGFA.
* The AP explained the shortfall in June…
There’s typically a decline in cigarette sales after a tax increase, as some people stock up before the rate hike, while others use it as a chance to stop smoking.
“This tax was discussed and talked about quite some time before it actually went into effect, so individuals went out and purchased in bulk a bunch of cigarettes, so more of those packs were sold under the lowered tax rate,” said Jim Muschinske, the commission’s revenue manager.
Total cigarette tax revenue for the year is expected to reach almost $788 million, up 37 percent from the previous year. The money from the cigarette tax is used for the state’s general fund, Medicaid program and School Infrastructure Fund.
* Well, the July revenue report from the Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability was released this morning. COGFA reports that cigarette tax revenue last month was up 150 percent over July of 2012. From the report…
While cigarette tax posted an $18 million increase, the gain was due to last July’s falloff related to the “stockpiling” effect of that year’s rate increase. This year, cigarette taxes to the general funds returned to statutory levels.
Discuss.
41 Comments
|
Raoul’s path
Monday, Aug 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…
Sen. Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago) was apparently taken aback a few weeks ago when his standard public comments about not ruling out a race for governor were taken as a dramatic sign that he might very well run.
The reaction should’ve been predictable. The most recent Capitol Fax/We Ask America poll, taken in mid-July, had Gov. Pat Quinn getting just 38 percent of the Democratic primary vote. That’s pretty awful for an incumbent. Bill Daley, who made his exploratory candidacy official last week, was at 33 percent.
That leaves a lot of wide open space for a new challenger. There is a very definable path for Raoul to do well here. And while he might not win, he’d likely set himself up for a future statewide race - possibly the 2016 US Senate primary - if he runs a credible campaign. There really just isn’t much of a downside, so let’s look at his path.
Race - African-Americans make up a huge segment of the Democratic primary vote, so Raoul, who is black, should do quite well as long as he’s seen as a credible candidate. Gov. Quinn is counting on winning the black vote in order to defeat Bill Daley, pretty much the same way he defeated Dan Hynes in 2010. Without that all-important constituency locked up, Quinn would be in very big trouble, indeed.
Quinn is not overwhelmingly popular with black voters. Just 47 percent back Quinn against Daley, according to the July poll, and Quinn’s job approval rating in a June poll among black Democrats was a mere 28 percent, while 40 percent disapproved.
Geography - Rumors abound that Quinn and Daley are looking at the possibility of choosing urban minority running mates. Raoul, however, would be free to choose a white Downstater or suburbanite, possibly giving him the only geographically “balanced” ticket on the Democratic side.
To say that Quinn is unpopular Downstate would be the understatement of the year. And Daley isn’t trusted by Downstaters. In the recent Democratic primary head-to-head poll I commissioned, “Undecided” led among Downstaters with 36 percent.
Money - Raoul raised $400,000 in the second quarter for an aborted attorney general bid. While his fundraising total trails the other two Democratic candidates, Raoul has far more money in the bank right now than state Sen. Kirk Dillard, who is touted as a serious Republican gubernatorial contender.
Public employee unions are desperate to back a candidate in the primary, but they don’t yet have anyone they can trust. Quinn and Daley both want pension reforms that they oppose, for instance. So it’s possible they could wind up in his corner, which means big bucks.
Also, if Raoul convinces black voters that he’s a credible candidate, then history shows he doesn’t really need to raise as much money as his opponents. Barack Obama, who was vastly outspent in the 2004 US Senate primary, is just one example of this.
Infrastructure - A late start in any statewide race is not a good thing because Illinois is so large and diverse and complicated and you don’t just pop up and run for something without having any infrastructure in place. But Raoul already started putting together a statewide race, so the beginnings of an infrastructure are there.
He could also very well have the strong support of Senate President John Cullerton, who has all but privately declared war on Quinn since the governor’s veto of state legislative salaries. Cullerton’s formidable organization could help Raoul set up a statewide organization. Most of Cullerton’s members, who are also Raoul’s fellow legislators, could be expected to pitch in as well.
If the unions jump in on his side, that would also be a big infrastructure help. Cook County African-American Democrats are some of the most well-organized and politically aware ethnic group in the state, which could give Raoul a built-in infrastructure advantage.
The Downsides - Raoul has never won a contested race, and experience at taking and throwing hard punches is crucial in a high-level contest like this one. While known to and respected by much of the media and the political establishment, he likely has close to zero name recognition amongst the voting populace. If he runs and ends up tossing the victory to Daley, he’ll likely upset several powerful black politicos. And since he hasn’t been on the radar screen, nobody knows what an opposition report might find.
He’ll need plenty of fire in his belly just to survive the day to day ordeal, but it’s not there yet. If he finds that fire, I think he might be able to pull this off.
Discuss.
44 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Caption contest!
Friday, Aug 2, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Funniest commenter wins a free beverage at the Illinois State Fair….
149 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Rauner talks a bit about Rendell
Friday, Aug 2, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Republican gubernatorial candidate Bruce Rauner was in Decatur this week and the Herald & Review’s Ryan Voyles was there…
Rauner took a variety of questions, from his stance on gay marriage to why a self-labeled political outsider has made political donations to Democratic candidates.
He has contributed $200,000 to the campaigns of former Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley and has supported current Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel. He has also supported former Philadelphia mayor and Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Randell when he ran for the Democratic National Committee and Forrest Claypoolol, who previously ran for Cook County Board president.
“I will never apologize for those four,” Rauner said, adding he supported the Chicago mayors because they control the schools and little can be done without their support.
He’ll never apologize, eh?
* I reached out to Voyles to see if he had any audio of Rauner talking about former Gov. Rendell. Why? Well, you may remember this story…
As friends and foes assess Ed Rendell’s tenure as governor, few events better illustrate his record in one contentious arena - campaign fund-raising - than his 2001 trip to see a Chicago businessman.
Rendell was in the early stages of the governor’s race. Aides had dispatched him to the Windy City with what they thought was a reasonable goal - a $50,000 check, according to one who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Rendell left the meeting buoyant, but confessed to aides he never asked the would-be donor for a set amount. Rendell “just had a feeling,” he told them.
A week or so later, the Chicagoan, Bruce Rauner, sent a check for $200,000. Another check, for $100,000, came just before the election.
At the time, Rauner’s private-equity firm had business with the state of Pennsylvania. GTCR L.L.C. was managing $110 million in pension funds for the State Employee Retirement System, records show.
After Rendell became governor, the state doubled its stake in GTCR funds, to $226 million. That meant at least $4 million more in management fees to the firm.
* So far, this is pretty much all the Rauner campaign has said about the money to Rendell. Greg Hinz…
As Rauner spokesman Chip Englander emailed me when I asked him for comment on the Philadelphia story, “The vast majority of (Mr. Rauner’s) donations have been to Republicans and conservative and government reform causes, but Bruce is an independent guy, and he has supported some Democrats who he knows personally, or who have pursued education reform or pro-business policies.”
Mr. Englander adds, “Pennsylvania invested in GTCR funds starting in 1997, four years before Bruce ever contributed (to Mr. Rendell). Pennsylvania invested in them, under Republican and Democratic governors alike, because of GTCR’s strong returns and great reputation.”
* My e-mail to the Herald & Review reporter bounced back, so I checked in with managing editor Dave Dawson and received this…
Ryan started vacation today. I texted him to confirm my interpretation of what Rauner said, It boils down to — and this is not a direct quote — we both wanted school reform and I donated because I wanted to start a relationship with him.
I’m sure he did want a relationship. How convenient.
32 Comments
|
Question of the day
Friday, Aug 2, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* AP…
Gov. Pat Quinn says if lawmakers don’t like his decision to halt their pay they should take a vote instead of going to the courts.
The Chicago Democrat spoke to reporters Wednesday a day after House Speaker Michael Madigan and Senate President John Cullerton sued over Quinn’s decision to cut pay. Quinn says his authority is constitutional. He has said he took action because of lawmakers’ inaction on pension reform.
* Greg Hinz agrees there should be an override vote…
Mr. Quinn didn’t grab all of the money and stick it in his sock drawer. Rather, he used his line-item veto to block the appropriation for legislative salaries.
If lawmakers don’t like that, they have a solution well within the traditional separation of powers. It’s called a veto override. If they don’t like how Mr. Quinn used his amendatory veto, they can get together and override him by the required 60 percent vote of both legislative chambers.
From what I’m hearing, the votes are there to do just that. But neither the House nor the Senate has scheduled such a vote. […]
So call a vote, Mr. Speaker and Mr. President. If it passes, you get your money. If it doesn’t, maybe then you have something worth taking to the judge.
* Eric Zorn disagrees with the governor…
[An override vote] would legitimize the salary squeeze as a parliamentary trick, putting the power of precedent behind governors of the future who want to shake down the General Assembly on matters of less importance than pension reform, and to legislators who want to try to use the budget process to starve the governor financially into submission.
Imagine, say, a Republican governor refusing to pay members of a General Assembly narrowly controlled by Democrats until they OK his tax plan or abortion restriction. Or imagine that same General Assembly threatening not to appropriate a dime to a Republican governor’s salary until she signs off on gay marriage or gun-rights restrictions.
There would be no logical end to the nonsense. And Tuesday’s lawsuit, filed in Cook County Circuit Court by House Speaker Michael Madigan and Senate President John Cullerton, is the best way to put a stop to it
The suit envisions several of the above scenarios and complains, quite rightly, of Quinn’s brazen violation of the principle of separation of powers.
* The Question: Should the General Assembly’s leaders withdraw their lawsuit and attempt to override the governor’s veto of legislative pay? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
survey solution
61 Comments
|
* From the Twitters…
* This has been a huge issue in Chicago…
Chicago residents vehemently voiced objections to the state fire marshal’s proposal to require all residential high-rise buildings to install fire sprinkler systems within the next 12 years at a town hall meeting Wednesday night.
The costs associated with implementing the water sprinklers are just too much to bear, far North Side residents said at the fire code meeting, hosted by State Rep. Kelly Cassidy (D-Chicago) at Loyola University’s Cueno Hall.
State Fire Marshal Larry Matkaitis is pushing for the rule change, which would require high-rises in Illinois built before 1975 to install sprinklers. Currently, high-rises in Chicago built prior to 1975 are exempt from the requirement to install sprinklers. The buildings without sprinklers have, instead, undergone a rigorous life safety evaluation, according to Asif Rahman, deputy commissioner of the city’s buildings department. The fire marshal’s proposed rule would also mandate sprinklers in all new homes.
* The last straw was probably when Senate President John Cullerton voiced his opposition this week…
In his role as senate president, Cullerton appointed three of the JCAR members.
“If you insist on filing this rule with JCAR, I will have no choice but to intercede and request that the three members of the Senate Democratic caucus who serve on JCAR reject this rule and will ask my fellow legislative leaders to do the same,” Cullerton’s letter continued.
* But the fire marshal is also in hot water with some downstaters…
he Illinois State Fire Marshal wants to mandate fire sprinkler systems be installed in all new residential home construction and existing places of assembly, and time is running out to stop his efforts. State Rep. David Reis (R-Ste. Marie) is sounding an alarm about the proposal and Monday, he called on fellow Illinoisans to speak out before it’s too late to stop the effort.
“Right now families are working hard to save enough money to purchase or build a home, and with this mandate, they will be required to pay thousands of dollars more,” Reis said in a statement. “Additionally, many homes downstate rely on wells for fresh water which cannot accommodate these increased demands, which will lead to additional well drilling costs.”
The Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM) proposed the new regulation on June 28, 2013, requiring the installation of fire sprinkler systems in new one-and-two family homes. Previous OSFM sprinkler mandate covered multi-family housing buildings, and single-family housing was carved out from the mandate. Existing churches and other places of public worship are also affected by this rulemaking.
*** UPDATE *** Statement from the Fire Marshal…
“After months of study into how we can better protect the lives and property of Illinois residents, I directed my office to draft Illinois’ first fire code update in 11 years.
“As the brave first responders alongside whom I have served during four decades in fire protection know, Illinois needs 21st century fire safety standards.
“Since we began this process, we conducted numerous meetings with local officials, legislators, fire safety professionals, community leaders and residents who have all expressed a desire to strengthen Illinois’ fire safety.
“We have received an unprecedented amount of public input and suggestions through emails, letters and public meetings.
“In the course of this process, it’s become clear that any proposed state rule needs additional refinement.
“Therefore today I am officially withdrawing the proposed rule before the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules to take into account substantial public comment and carefully re-examine this issue.”
26 Comments
|
Dan Walker redux?
Friday, Aug 2, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Long-ago Statehouse political reporter Mike Lawrence compares Gov. Pat Quinn’s veto of legislative salaries to Quinn’s old boss Dan Walker…
For a governor facing a steep re-election climb and taunted as inept and irrelevant by lawmakers, it was both a payback and a ploy to build his sagging poll numbers.
He cast the move as policy driven, arguing it would jolt lawmakers into helping him fix what Quinn rightly portrays as a grave threat to the state’s viability. However, petty revenge rarely begets positive results, as Walker and constant cycles of vengeance dramatically illustrated four decades ago.
“The free ride is over.” That 1973 quote is from Walker’s inaugural after he won the office by casting himself as a white knight and verbally lancing primary foe Paul Simon as a puppet of Chicago Mayor Richard J. Daley despite the downstater’s good-government record. Few, if any, phrases uttered by a new governor have been so long remembered. When his administration strayed from the righteous ride he had promised, his credibility suffered. At the same time, most Democratic and Republican lawmakers took the rhetorical flourish as a call to war.
They rejected key gubernatorial appointments. He often flew to media markets throughout the state to denounce what he colorfully painted as their profligate and corrupt ways. They slashed funding for his staff to deplete it. He responded by sneaking aides, including Quinn, onto the payrolls of state agencies to which they had little or no accountability as the aides did his bidding.
Walker nixed funding for pet causes of uncooperative lawmakers. They responded by shooting down his high-flying infrastructure initiative amid a chorus of dive-bomber whistles that reached a surreal crescendo when one of the legislation’s chief sponsors urged colleagues to join him in voting against it.
* A 1980 Illinois Issues story explained the above mention of Quinn’s ghost payrolling for Walker…
During 1975, Quinn was considered one of the infamous “ghost payrollers” of the Walker administration. The former governor placed dozens of assistants on agency payrolls where the employee did little or no work and did not report to supervisors there. Walker was accused of attempting to disguise how he had expanded the number of employees in the governor’s office because of his campaign pledge not to do so.
Quinn was one of those employees. He was hired in January 1973 as an $18,000 a year assistant and was given a title indicating he would be a liaison to the public. The following year, he was given a pay raise to $20,000. The next year, he was shifted to the payroll of the Illinois Industrial Commission and received a raise to $23,000. At that point, Quinn became the target of legislative inquiry. Legislators, many in open confrontation with Walker, grilled agency directors about their payrolls when they appeared before appropriations committees. The chairman of the Industrial Commission, during one question session, admitted Quinn did not work full time for the agency. The lawmakers also accused Quinn of being “in conflict of interest” because he telephoned legislators seeking support for proposed constitutional amendments while on the commission payroll.
Just prior to that charge, however, Quinn resigned from state government, returned to law school and remained politically active by forming a group known as the Coalition for Political Honesty in Oak Park. The coalition has been fueled by individual contributions and money from Quinn’s pocket and kept alive by the help of several dozen volunteers.
“It’s so ironic,” said Rep. Anne Wilier (D., Western Springs). “Here’s a guy who not only was a double-dipper himself, had conflicts of interest and received pay for a job some people say he didn’t do - he has turned around to stir up the public a few years later to get them to oust legislators who are double-dippers, have conflicts of interest and who vote themselves pay raises. I think Pat is very intelligent. But I’d say he is nothing short of a hypocrite. What I resent most about him is he knows better. He knows because he’s been here himself.”
21 Comments
|
* I’m not sure Rep. Monique Davis did herself any good by going on Fox News last night, but it’s been my experience that state legislators cannot resist the siren call of the national spotlight, so whatever…
Bill O’Reilly [last night] faced off with Illinois state representative Monique Davis, who said on a radio show this week that many of her constituents have “suspicions” that Chicago police are gunning down black children. O’Reilly told Davis that she unfairly legitimized a “destructive” rumor, and that she had a responsibility in her role as an elected official not to say such garbage in the public eye.
Davis insisted to O’Reilly that she wasn’t alleging anything, just repeating what constituents told her. O’Reilly pressed her on why she didn’t dismiss it as “crazy,” explaining that she has “credibility as an elected official” and she should know better than to say police are killing black kids. Davis suggested that given how such a high number (70 percent) of murders in Chicago remain unsolved, “people are wondering what the heck is going on.”
O’Reilly still insisted she was being “irresponsible,” and switched to overall problems in the black community. Davis told O’Reilly he was “terribly wrong” about the majority of black problems originating in the collapse of the family unit, pointing to poor education and a lack of “resources to help these kids to anything.” O’Reilly brought up the out-of-wedlock pregnancy rate, to which Davis shot back that unmarried actresses get pregnant all the time. O’Reilly said, “Actresses aren’t living in the ghetto.”
* Video…
* More…
“I didn’t say it, Bill. I repeated what members of my community have said to me,” Davis said. “It is crucially important that people realize that was not Monique Davis’s statement.”
“Do I have to say that?” Davids asked when O’Reilly prompted her to refute such statements as falsehoods.
“Yeah, you do,” O’Reilly shot back. “Here’s why you have to say it, two reasons: Number one, you have credibility as an elected official, alight? And number two, people don’t know where you stand…That is destructive to the discourse. Chicago police as you know are not gunning down black children. You know that, right?”
Bill O’Reilly complaining that somebody who doesn’t have a nationally televised cable TV show is being “destructive to the discourse” is more than a tad bit ironic. Just sayin…
The full transcript is here.
43 Comments
|
Unintended consequences
Friday, Aug 2, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From David Ormsby…
Because of an oversight in the [federal] Obamacare law, those who require a residential stay to power their recovery are unable to use the vast majority of Illinois drug-treatment residential programs with 17 beds or more because they are prohibited from being Medicaid certified due to an older Medicaid law.
So, what does this mean?…
An unemployed, homeless man who was living in a Chicago homeless shelter managed, through the help of friend, to present himself at a suburban Cook County drug treatment agency, pleading for help to overcome his alcohol abuse. The assessment revealed he needed residential treatment due to severity of his condition.
The response from CountyCare’s HMO provider? Denied.
The individual was denied both because the residential program was not — and could not be — Medicaid certified and because the man, struggling on his own to overcome his alcoholism, had taken no alcoholic drink in two days. The agency was told that the client needed to fail first in outpatient care — he had to resume drinking — before residential treatment became a viable option. Just what the doctor ordered.
What happened?
The man finally reported to the CountyCare HMO that he began drinking again, leading the HMO to hospitalize him in medical detox — a vastly more expensive option than residential treatment. And Obamacare picked up the bill.
Before CountyCare, this man would have received the less costly clinical detox in the agency’s residential program for men under its contract with Illinois Division of Alcohol and Substance Abuse. But for those now enrolled CountyCare, the state option is no longer available. The state, which is looking to save money, is no longer willing to expend its own precious tax dollars because the promise of Obamacare was to save states money by having the feds picking up the tab.
Oy.
And, of course, we can’t expect any congressional trailer bills to fix problems like this because the US House is bound and determined to repeal the law.
In the meantime, though, the state needs to revisit its policies here.
10 Comments
|
Kirk: No state bailouts
Friday, Aug 2, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I think this is the third time that Sen. Kirk has filed this resolution. From a press release…
U.S. Senator Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), along with Senators Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Dan Coats (R-Ind.), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) today introduced the No State Bailouts Resolution, S. Res. 215, which expresses opposition to the Federal bailout of financially struggling states like Illinois.
“This resolution expresses our support for blocking potential state bailouts and reducing states’ spending - restoring confidence to lenders and lowering borrowing costs,” Sen Kirk said. “Encouraging fiscal responsibility will help protect the Federal Government’s credit rating.”
The No State Bailouts Resolution declares that the States, as sovereign entities, retain control over their spending and taxation, and are therefore responsible for their own debts. The resolution also states that historic precedent opposes a bailout of the states, citing the historic example from the financial crisis of 1842. In the 1840s, several states faced funding crises, having spent so much that they could not repay their creditors. In 1842, the Senate requested then-Secretary of State Daniel Webster report any negotiations with state creditors to the Senate, in order to ensure no promises of Federal Government support were offered. As such, the cosponsors agree that the Federal Government should “take no action to redeem, assume, or guarantee State debt.” States should see this resolution and recognize that the Federal Government is not going to bail them out of a fiscal insolvency and that the elected leaders in these states should take responsibility, and adopt measures to become fiscally responsible— balancing their budgets the way that every American household does.
* No bailouts for states and local governments, but oodles of money for foreign aid…
Detroit may be bankrupt, but more federal aid dollars are set to go to the country of Colombia than to America’s 18th-largest city next year, according to a report from Bloomberg News.
Bloomberg reports that the South American nation will receive almost $323 million through President Barack Obama’s new proposal to fight drug trafficking and violence. A State Department memo cited by the report says three-quarters of the money will be used to maintain “peace and security” in Colombia.
Conversely, Detroit, which filed for bankruptcy almost two weeks ago with at least $18 billion in long-term debt, will receive just $108.2 million in funds from the U.S. government in 2014, according to Bloomberg. Some $33 million of that total award is funded by a Community Block Grant distributed each year to urban cities and counties.
Detroit’s murder rate is nearly twice as high as Colombia’s, increasing 10 percent in 2012 to 53 murders for every 100,000 residents — second only to New Orleans among U.S. cities. Despite that sobering fact, the Detroit Police Department is currently eligible to receive just $2 million in funds next year from the feds.
Discuss.
47 Comments
|
O’Halloran doesn’t go quietly
Friday, Aug 2, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Embattled Metra Chairman Brad O’Halloran has resigned…
In his two-page letter, O’Halloran repeated his claims that he referred all Clifford’s allegations — which O’Halloran dubbed “non-specific”— about political pressure to the inspector general and tried to get “the pre-eminent anti-corruption watchdog” attorney Patrick Collins involved.
“My reaction was not to ‘hush’ anything up, but rather to direct the matter immediately to the inspector general, so that he could get to the bottom of it,” he wrote.
In answering Clifford’s charges, O’Halloran maintained that Clifford “misrepresented or outright invented supposed conversations he claims to have had with me.” And writing in a defiant tone, he continued to stand by what he called a “business decision” to avoid costly litigation with Clifford, calling it the “lesser of two bad choices in order for the agency to move forward.”
“While I have been taking the heat, it seems the powerful politicians Mr. Clifford accused escaped the same level of criticism,” he wrote at the end of his letter.
There goes Madigan, right under the bus.
And Bobby Rush.
O’Halloran’s full resignation letter is here.
* Another Metra board member, Mike McCoy, resigned recently, but his reasonings weren’t given much play anywhere…
Prior to the April 3 memo, McCoy said he thought Clifford’s contract would be renewed, despite recognizing that O’Halloran had serious differences with the CEO, who was paid $252,000 a year.
“I think if he’d just gone forward with the contract process he would have gotten a contract extension,” McCoy noted.
But comments in the April 3 letter changed McCoy’s view of Clifford’s career at Metra.
Clifford wrote that his lawyer (patronage expert Michael Shakman) was communicating with Metra attorneys “concerning claims I may have against Metra arising from the facts described in this memo.”
That to McCoy was a threat and, from then on, he felt there was no way to deal in good faith with Clifford.
“After he threatened to sue it was very hard going forward. For example, if he didn’t like my review, would he say that I was retaliating? If we disagree on policy issues, is that retaliating? I became convinced unless we offered him another contract there was going to be a lawsuit.”
Clifford charged that a committee led by O’Halloran and Huggins would evaluate him, making a “sham” of the entire performance review.
McCoy thinks Clifford “implied two people controlled the evaluation process and that was never true. It had to be a board decision and he resisted the process.”
McCoy is a Republican. More…
McCoy said he voted to support the Clifford severance package, strictly on the basis of the numbers.
“I felt the financial risk of litigating and possibly losing the Clifford threatened lawsuit far outweighed the cost of the settlement,” he wrote. “I believe this even more strongly today.”
* Shouldn’t Schaffer also resign if he wants everybody gone?…
Metra Board member Jack Schaffer has denounced the severance package as “hush money.”
On Wednesday, Schaffer stood with GOP gubernatorial hopeful Bill Brady as Brady called for the entire board to be dumped. Brady had harsh words for O’Halloran, saying his behavior “lies in question” and that he should answer questions and be held accountable.
More Schaffer…
“I’ve said for weeks that in order to fix this mess, the first thing we needed was a change in the chairman’s position,” Schaffer said. “Brad O’Halloran had to go.”
Not mentioned is that Schaffer was never happy with O’Halloran’s election. From last year…
Director Jack Schaeffer of Cary poked the so-called appointing authorities, thanking them “for the long, long, long deliberations and giving us advice. I wish them well as they tackle their other great issues … and express the hope they let us now run the railroad. It could have been done better.”
* And then there was this…
A South Side reverend, who was ordered in January to pay back a $91,000 state grant after he couldn’t account for how it was spent, resigned Wednesday from the Regional Transportation Authority.
The Rev. Tyrone Crider’s resignation comes about six months after he was reappointed to the RTA board by Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle Feb. 27. The RTA is the agency that oversees city and suburban transportation, including the scandal-plagued Metra commuter rail system.
Preckwinkle was unaware at the time she reappointed him that Crider had been sued by Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s office and had been ordered by a Cook County Circuit Court judge on Jan. 11 to repay the state grant, said Kristen Mack, a spokeswoman for the County Board president.
Carnage.
16 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|