Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x1 - Duckworth response: “a lie, pure and simple” *** Duckworth “whistleblowers” appear in TV ad for Kirk
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 - Duckworth response: “a lie, pure and simple” *** Duckworth “whistleblowers” appear in TV ad for Kirk

Monday, Sep 19, 2016 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Tribune

Republican U.S. Sen. Mark Kirk is launching a new TV ad today featuring the two women who sued his Democratic challenger, Tammy Duckworth, for alleged workplace retaliation during her tenure as head of the state’s Department of Veterans’ Affairs.

A judge in Union County has not acted on the case, in which the attorney general’s office in June said that a $26,000 settlement had been reached with no finding of wrongdoing, only to see the plaintiffs subsequently say later that they didn’t agree to it.

In the new 30-second Kirk attack ad, the two plaintiffs, Christine Butler and Denise Goins, who work at the Anna Veterans’ Home, try to make their case to the public while an announcer accused Duckworth of “covering up the abuse” of veterans.

* The ad

* Script…

Goins: She said to me point blank: keep your mouth shut and you won’t be fired.

Announcer: Veterans abused under Tammy Duckworth’s watch. When whistleblowers came forward, Duckworth fired and threatened them - covering up the abuse.

Butler: Director Tammy Duckworth was trying to protect Governor Blagojevich. I believe she put her ​personal aspirations ahead of the veteran’s care.

Announcer: Duckworth is a war hero. But she’s been a terrible public servant.

Butler: The veteran was not Tammy Duckworth’s top priority.

I’m Mark Kirk and I approve this message.

*** UPDATE ***  Response…

“The story this ad purports to tell is a lie, pure and simple, and Senator Kirk knows it. The lawsuit was called a ‘garden variety workplace case’ by a federal judge, and has been dismissed in whole or in part three times. Indeed, the plaintiffs agreed to settle the case for what the Attorney General called ‘nuisance value,’ before Senator Kirk cynically recruited them to star in a political commercial. Tammy Duckworth, a decorated combat veteran, has spent her entire adult life defending our country and assuring that Veterans are treated with respect. Tammy gets her own health care from the VA, and she makes no apology for fighting to assure that Veterans are given nothing but the highest quality care. Senator Kirk, on the other hand, has lied at least ten times about his own military record. He continues to plumb the depths of campaign vitriol, desperately spinning yarns of his own military glory, while baselessly attacking his opponent’s dedication to our Veterans. Kirk’s claims are pathetic. He should salvage what’s left of his dignity, apologize to Veterans, and pull this shameless ad.” — Matt McGrath, campaign spokesman

Background info is here.

       

21 Comments
  1. - Dee Lay - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 9:09 am:

    I’m Mark Kirk and I approve this false message that will launch a potential tampering investigation.

    Fixed it for you Kirk campaign.


  2. - Anon - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 9:19 am:

    Protip: If the settlement hasn’t been finalized, be nice.

    This would probably be a different situation if a youngish politico hadn’t jumped all over the opportunity for media before everything was finalized.


  3. - Anonymous - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 9:23 am:

    Obviously, the proposed settlement did not contain a clause prohibiting disparaging remarks.

    Duckworth’s campaign messed up by making unwarranted comments that riled up the plaintiffs.


  4. - DuPage Bard - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 9:26 am:

    I’m guessing the payment from the Kirk campaign was bigger then the payment from the settlement.
    This could be the only time that a GOP candidate used a picture and quote from a State employee with out slamming their AFSCME contract.


  5. - peets - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 9:27 am:

    pretty tough cutting ad against Duckworth. they should have let the suit be finalized before trashing the whistleblowers and spiking the football.


  6. - Big Joe - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 9:38 am:

    I’m Mark Kirk, and I can’t keep from making mistakes during my campaign. My foot can barely fit in my mouth any more. So I am trying other methods to make me look competent enough to retain my seat in the Senate.


  7. - Chucktownian - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 9:51 am:

    And Kirk is still going to lose and lose big. Nice try.


  8. - A guy - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 10:03 am:

    This is an extraordinary ad. It cuts right to the bone. No matter who you back here, this one is well produced and well executed. It’s more than a “nice try”, it’s a devastating message. Ouch.


  9. - Anonymous - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 10:23 am:

    I thought the Kirk anti-Trump and Spanish-language spots were very good and deserved some money behind them. I don’t undererstand this approach at all.

    The premise is a disabled combat veteran allowed abuse of disabled veterans. Sell it. Kirk even calls Duckworth a “war hero” in the spot. Great way to spend your limited funds.

    What this spot will provoke, yet again, is a round of spots featuring male combat veterans ripping Kirk on his service record “embellishment” and praising Duckworth.

    I don’t get it.


  10. - slow down - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 10:32 am:

    This about it this way. Kirk’s been in either the House or Senate for the better part of last two decades and his entire rationale for reelection is that he’s recovering from a stroke and Duckworth was sued for $26,000. It’s really incredibly embarrassing.


  11. - NIU Grad - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 10:55 am:

    “Duckworth’s campaign messed up…”

    There’s the theme of the this whole campaign.

    It’s a strong ad, especially acknowledging that she is a war hero, but that she hasn’t been effective as an administrator/campaigner/legislator.


  12. - Annonin' - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 10:59 am:

    I’m CommandoMakeItUp and I’m tryin’ this stunt cause nothin’ else is workin, Trump/Rauner draggin’ me down and


  13. - A guy - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 11:28 am:

    To the update: How this spokesman is still around defies belief. That’s a lot, a lot of explaining, and includes his patented “slamming” of another Veteran’s service, which the ad went out of its way to avoid. Really dopey response.


  14. - Thunder Fred - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 11:29 am:

    Now the campaign is calling the whistle blowers liars? Why are they twisting the knife in their self inflicted wound?


  15. - Jocko - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 11:37 am:

    Tammy’s crew should’ve kept their pie hole shut and, for goodness sake, put conditions on the settlement that all parties stay mum.

    The fact that these “whistleblowers” are talking when their lawyers put this to rest leaves me a little uneasy.


  16. - siriusly - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 12:53 pm:

    I’m glad you are covering this race Rich. It is for a US Senate seat, it’s important.

    But honestly, I find the contest between these two extremely boring.


  17. - @MisterJayEm - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 1:11 pm:

    “Tammy’s crew should’ve kept their pie hole shut”

    Lather, rinse, repeat.

    – MrJM


  18. - Responsa - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 1:18 pm:

    I don’t know who is going to be Illinois’ Junior Senator after this election’s votes are counted. But I do know that Matt McGrath is one of THE worst spokesmen for any campaign for any office that I have seen in several decades of watching elections communications in this state. Tammy’s a weak candidate and she needed a top notch team supporting her. She obviously doesn’t have that.


  19. - Ron Burgundy - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 2:04 pm:

    As said by others above, none of this happens if a staffer doesn’t shoot their mouth off and characterize the settlement in a way that offended the plaintiffs before the ink was dry and the judge dismissed the case. If that happens the plaintiffs are probably bound by its terms to keep quiet and not disparage Duckworth, and Kirk is left to try to make hay out of a lawsuit dismissed for nominal value. Instead, we get this. How does that person still have a job (if they do)?


  20. - Shytown - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 3:58 pm:

    What a boring duo. The Duckworth campaign is a big snoozer and seem completely inactive. The Kirk campaign isn’t much better, but this ad can stick with folks who don’t have time to read or understand the book (I mean statement) that the Duckworth campaign issued to the media about this.


  21. - Terrible Towel - Monday, Sep 19, 16 @ 4:25 pm:

    I was going to comment on the ad, but I’m kind of stuck on Matt McGrath’s lack of ability to be a spokesperson. Is McGrath a veteran? I don’t think dogging a veteran’s service (if you have not served yourself) is a wise move. I can totally get Tammy and Mark going after each other on the subject, but I think MM crossed the line. It’s not the first time he’s done that. Just my 2 cents…


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Madigan corruption trial roundup: Jury views undercover videos
* It’s just a bill
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Pritzker, Stratton, Think Big, Giannoulias respond to national election results
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller