Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Dear Daily Herald: How hard would it be to click over to Dold’s site, too?
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Dear Daily Herald: How hard would it be to click over to Dold’s site, too?

Friday, Jun 18, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller

* This is a prime example of seriously lazy journalism

The Democratic candidate for the 10th Congressional District seat has been called out for using an old endorsement.

Dan Seals was misleading voters by including a portion of a Daily Herald endorsement as part of a rotating gallery of information on his campaign home page, according to a blogger who follows the action in the 10th.

The endorsement came during the Democratic primary, as Seals dueled two other candidates. He edged state Rep. Julie Hamos for the nomination to face Republican Bob Dold in the November general election. The seat is currently held by Republican Mark Kirk, who is running for U.S. Senate.

“It doesn’t apply today,” said Larry Falbe, a Mettawa trustee and creator of Team America’s 10th District blog.

“This isn’t buried somewhere on an endorsement list. It’s front and center,” added Falbe, a Kirk supporter and volunteer for Dold who has been critical of Seals in the past.

Here’s the image in question, which has since been removed from Seals’ site and which Team America published on Wednesday

Props to Larry for pushing that story into the mainstream, but the Daily Herald reporter and Larry should’ve both looked at Republican Bob Dold’s website before they launched into their attack on Dan Seals. If they had, they would’ve seen this…

In case you’re a little slow this morning, that would be the exact same “problem” as Seals’ website had. Dold is prominently displaying a Tribune endorsement from the primary.


Rob thinks this is an example of media bias. If the reporter knew about the Dold site and didn’t include it in the story, then, yes, it’s bias. But we don’t know yet whether the reporter knew, so that’s why I’ve just labeled this as journalistic laziness. If it’s worse, I’ll get back to you.


  1. - Team America - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 10:53 am:

    Hi Rich - as I have already posted at Team America and at Illinois Reason, if Team Seals can show me that the click-through button on the Seals page took you to the full endorsement piece showing the date and the whole context that it concerned the primary, then I’ll retract everything. That’s how the Dold website it set up, which is clearly not intended to mislead. But I don’t think it did, since I had to go digging for the original Daily Herald endorsement peice on their website. I am willing to be corrected if I was wrong.

  2. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 10:57 am:

    ===which is clearly not intended to mislead===

    It says “endorses.” If it wasn’t “misleading” it should say “endorsed for the primary.” A simple headline change.

    Much ado about little, but still.

    Also, if you wanna get all technical, publishing an entire newspaper story on a campaign website violates copyright laws unless he first obtained permission.

  3. - Easy peasy - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 10:57 am:

    I just went to I clicked through the numbers on the front page graphic, and got the Trib slide on my second click.

  4. - R.P. McMurphy - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 10:58 am:

    Yeah…..that’s a highly nuanced, and frankly pretty stupid, distinction.

    It’s completely legit to criticize journalists for being so lazy as to only rely on biased bloggers for their research.

  5. - Rob_N - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 10:59 am:

    No you’re not Falbe.

    Rich, I ended my piece with this:

    “This lack of 30-seconds of basic research is a failure on the media’s part and yet more evidence that the press isn’t “liberal” no matter how often the cons complain about it.”

    Lazy is as lazy does, but simple “lazines” doesn’t explain why the media ignored the clearly numerous stories about Mark Kirk’s serial lying over an entire decade…

    This is simply the start of a new decade.

  6. - ArchPundit - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 11:01 am:

    Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence

  7. - Rob_N - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 11:03 am:

    Falbe says, “I am willing to be corrected if I was wrong.”

    No you’re not. You’re such a lawyer you’ve pulled a Kirk — this clause was about that timeframe while the other clause was about a completely different thing. Ne’ermind that both things could quite easily, perhaps even intentionally, be confuzed.

    The Dold homepage says this:

    “Chicago Tribune Endorses Robert Dold
    ‘Congress needs more people who genuinely understand what it takes to put people to work… Dold makes a convincing argument that he does… Dold is endorsed.’”

    And his splash IS STILL THERE!

    I don’t see anything there about when the Trib endorsed him.

    You’re such a lawyer. ;)

  8. - Team America - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 11:03 am:

    I’m still willing to be corrected. As I recall, the Seals button took one to page that simply featured logos of Seals’ other endorsements. That’s different than the way Dold set it up, which allows you to clearly see it was from the primary, unlike the Seals page. Otherwise, I stand by the post.

  9. - Cincinnatus - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 11:04 am:

    ArchPundit - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 11:01 am said:

    “Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence”

    That, sir, should be a Burma Shave sign!

  10. - shore - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 11:09 am:

    1. Team America gets more stories into the msm than any hobbyist blogger in this state. Pat Brady should get him into hq for a debriefing because he has made dan seals life hell for the past 4 years. If the party is serious about grassroots organizing and leadership, we could use a dozen more blogs like this.

    2. The problem with lakefront liberal and chicago democrat dan seals is that he has 6 years of deception and lying from his resume to his energy stunt that caused a traffic mess to lying about his employment history to his infamous israel bashing on atcenternetwork, to failing to live in the district for 5 years. Dold, so far does not have that history.

  11. - wordslinger - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 11:10 am:

    Laziness and incompetence are far more widespread than actual malice. You have to work at malice.

  12. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 11:15 am:

    === The problem with lakefront liberal and chicago democrat dan seals is that he has 6 years of deception and lying from his resume… ===

    Problem? Looking at Mark Kirk, lying about your resume seems to be a prerequisite for getting elected to Congress in the 10th.

    I’d argue Seals probably needs to juice it up more…talk about how he brought down the Berlin Wall or cured cancer or something…to catch up with Kirk.

  13. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 11:16 am:

    TA, this is what you wrote on Wednesday…

    ===The critical point is, though, that one would think by simply looking at Seals’ website, that the quote given is current, or at least, against Seals’ current opponent, Bob Dold. That’s obviously not true, but Seals is clearly counting on the notion that most casual visitors to his website aren’t going to dig any deeper.===

    You set it up wrong, man. No biggie, but you did.

  14. - FillB - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 11:20 am:

    Thanks for the totally informed and unbiased thoughts, shore.

  15. - Rob_N - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 11:21 am:

    Rich, “no biggie?”

    It’s the crux of Falbe’s entire argument. And now that he’s been called out on it he’s moving the goalposts.

    Looking at “the website” was the grape that makes up Falbe’s entire whine and site to site Dold and Seals were doing the exact same thing re past endorsements.

    In fact, only Dold still is doing exactly what his own supporter Falbe complains about.

  16. - shore - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 11:25 am:

    This is not about Kirk-who went 17-18 in endorsements in the 6 competitive elections he ran in the 10th losing only to tom lachner in a primary in 2000.

    It is about mr.seals who as team america has documented over the last 3 years has never lived in the district and hasn’t had a job for the last 4 years. He’s lied about

    -where he went to school
    -that he was aide to senator lieberman and at the department of commerce when he was really an intern
    -his employment history at “the point”
    -his employment history at “ge financial”
    -his employment history at northwestern
    -his position on Israel.
    -his place of residency

  17. - Missing the point - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 11:26 am:

    YDD — credit where credit is due: that was funny.

    TA’s set-up and attack on Seals aside, let’s not miss an important point here. Dold is attacking Seals for leaving an endorsement up on his site. Once Seals’ camp was notified, it was removed. Dold’s camp, on the hand, responded to the Herald’s story (his spokesperson is quoted), all the while knowing, one would think, that their site touted the primary endorsement from the Tribune.

  18. - Joe - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 11:29 am:

    I think the point TA is trying to make is: Dold can do it, Seals can’t because IOKIYAR.

  19. - P. - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 11:46 am:

    There’s no excuse for this. I bet they try to say, Well the DH was correcting the DH record and the story was meant to stop Seals from using the DH endorsement inappropriately. It’s also pretty inexcusable for the campaign, which is now being run by a DCCC operative for several months and now a former Quigley staffer and operative, to not correct the Web site. C’mon guys. Seriously?

    That said, if the DH reporter saw the Trib endorsement, you gotta call someone on the Trib ed board, then report on that too.

    Last, how does Dold call out Seals without checking their own Web site?!?! They all forgot how they proudly promoted the Tribune endorsement or thought the Internet cleared it up for them on its own?

  20. - Rob_N - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 11:55 am:

    P — Both Dold and Seals earned those respective endorsements… Why is there “no excuse” for this?

    They can fairly list the endorsements til their sites get overhauled for the general.

    The bogus part is for Dold’s supporter to come rip-roarin down the printing press with an attack that Seals is in the wrong with nary a word about Dold doing the exact same thing.

  21. - Obamarama - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 12:10 pm:

    This happens all the time. Dan Cronin’s website lists both the DH and Trib endorsements from the primary even though that was over four months ago.

  22. - Missing the point - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 12:16 pm:

    The story isn’t that both campaigns had outdated endorsements on their site. The story is that Dold’s campaign actively pushed out an attack, accusing their opponent of something they themselves were guilty of, knowingly or otherwise.

  23. - Cincinnatus - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 12:28 pm:

    - Obamarama - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 12:10 pm:

    “This happens all the time. Dan Cronin’s website lists both the DH and Trib endorsements from the primary even though that was over four months ago.”

    The fact that politicians are too lazy to keep their web sites up to date shows me how little the candidates, and their staffs, do not understand that there interweb thang.

    Web sites require constant updating for no other reason than to keep the content fresh and keep interested parties returning to the site. Web Marketing 101.

  24. - tikkunolam - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 1:22 pm:

    -The fact that politicians are too lazy to keep their web sites up to date shows me how little the candidates, and their staffs, do not understand that there interweb thang.-

    Actually, Cincinnatus, it demonstrates that it is political tradition to tout primary endorsements until general election ones are issued. Seals’ website is updated with at least one new blog post a week as well as regular pictures and the upcoming event schedule. I don’t know how many campaigns you’ve been a part of, mate, but there isn’t an even semi-competitive candidate in a close district that in fits the definition of “lazy.” Campaign staffers work incredibly hard, and usually for little or no pay. Don’t lump ‘em all together and call ‘em “lazy.”

  25. - Rob_N - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 1:28 pm:

    Here’s the thing about the “need to update the site” issue.

    I haven’t been checking Seals’ site — had no reason to.

    Also hadn’t been checking Dold’s site all that often. Again, no reason to.

    But if you go to both you’ll see both are content management sites, meaning that the homepages are constantly being updated with new events, new posts, new pictures, etc.

    In other words, the sites themselves may not have been overhauled for the general election yet but both — Dold’s and Seals’ — are being constantly updated.

  26. - CircularFiringSquad - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 1:30 pm:

    Speaking of CommadoKirk isn’t CommandoKinzinger still leaving voters with the impression that he is up there with the Red Baron, Sky King and Terry and the Pirate battlin’ the bad guys
    Maybe Gags Brady can rush out a release
    Fire,Aim, Ready!
    Have a great weekend

  27. - Carl Nyberg - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 1:54 pm:

    This gives a pretty good hint why the Chicago media missed the Kirk story for a decade.

    Partly, sloth.

    Partly, a willingness to be led around by GOP operatives.

  28. - Cincinnatus - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 1:57 pm:

    ikkunolam - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 1:22 pm:

    To paraphrase Frank Sinatra, Campaigns, I’ve worked a few…

    Like Rob_N says most sites aren’t overhauled. Once the primaries were over, staff should get things ready for the general. Any candidate who thinks just posting new blog posts makes an up-to-date web site doesn’t understand how his site is used, by both supporters and opponents.

    Inertia is at play here. Staffers will update the “News” section and not review the rest of the site. Web site maintenance is actually more like gravity than inertia. With inertia, if you push something, it will continue going on its own. With gravity, you must keep pushing or the thing stops.

    Web sites are too visible, they are not a 3-ring binder sitting on someone’s desk where you can keep endorsements filed. The site must be constantly parsed for errors, omissions, additions and above all must be completely accurate. This is Web 2.0, not mimeograph 1.0.

  29. - Rob_N - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 4:40 pm:

    Carl, Rich -

    I just posted the Herald reporter’s response to me after asking him if he had checked Dold’s site.

    The Herald reporter told me essentially the same thing as Falbe’s hair-splitting excuse…

    Quite the ko-inky-dink.

    No word on whether or not the reporter even checked Dold’s site before writing the story, but I asked him that too (twice now).

  30. - Team America - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 4:48 pm:

    Rob_N, I think you’re getting a little carried away with yourself. Are you trying to imply that… shock and horror… I spoke with Mick Zawislak, the DH reporter…? I would suggest to you that it is a little hard to be interviewed (and quoted) for a story without talking to a reporter. Next thing you will be suggesting that Camp Alexi feeding info to the New York Times to dump on Kirk is somehow askance.

  31. - Rob_N - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 4:56 pm:

    Team/Falbe, Mr. Zawislak gave me that response this morning.

    Are you saying you spoke with him again early today after the story was published and after I asked him whether or not he had checked Dold’s site before writing the article?

    (A question he has yet to answer, by the way.)

    In other words, are you informing us you told him what to say this morning when people asked about the apparent lack of research and balance in his article?

  32. - Team America - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 4:59 pm:

    I don’t know if Zawislak looked at Dold’s site before he wrote the story or not. But if you think I can brainwash a Daily Herald reporter and tell him what to say, then you’re daffy.

  33. - Rob_N - Friday, Jun 18, 10 @ 5:03 pm:

    Nice dodge but you didn’t answer either of my questions.

    Did you speak to him this morning and tell him the same thing you posted here at 10:53am and at Illinois Reason a few moments earlier at 10:44am?

    Mr. Zawislak’s very similar reply to me came in at 10:55am, about the same time.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Republicans denied TRO in bid to be appointed to ballot
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* It’s almost a law
* Credit Unions: A Smart Financial Choice for Illinois Consumers
* Was the CTU lobby day over-hyped?
* 'Re-renters' tax in the budget mix?
* It’s just a bill
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Get The Facts On The Illinois Prescription Drug Board
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...











Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller