Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Heated debate on notification, Fritchey claims death threats
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Heated debate on notification, Fritchey claims death threats

Friday, Apr 27, 2007

A parental notification of abortion bill came up short in the House yesterday, scoring just 55 votes of the 60 needed.

Favored by abortion-rights groups, the initiative that failed 55-62 was designed to broaden the pool of adults that pregnant girls could contact to fulfill a dormant 1995 parental-notification law.

That law, which is before a federal court and could soon be enforced, requires females under 18 to notify an adult relative or receive approval from a judge. The legislation voted on Thursday would have allowed minors in dysfunctional families to notify an aunt or uncle or meet with a health professional instead.

“This is not a referendum on abortion,” said Rep. John Fritchey, the bill’s lead sponsor. “It is a referendum on protecting the health and safety of young women.”

There was lots of heated debate

“It’s really irresponsible for people on the other side to characterize any of us as pro-abortion,” said state Rep. Rosemary Mulligan, a Des Plaines Republican who voted for the plan. “That’s not where we’re going with this. What we want to do is protect young women. We want to protect them from going to the wrong place if they do seek an abortion.”

Critics argued the proposal didn’t do enough to help young girls in what could be one of the most important decisions they’ll ever make. They also said teenagers should have a compelling reason, such as incest or other dangers, for wanting to go around telling their parents, something more than embarrassment or fear of parental retribution.

“I’m her father … and I should know about it,” said state Rep. Robert Molaro, a Chicago Democrat and the father of three teen daughters, who voted against the plan.

And also lots of charges and counter-charges from both sides, including claims of death threats…

Opponents suggested Fritchey was trying to torpedo any notification law by leaving out language that lets courts rule part of the law unconstitutional without striking down the whole measure. Omitting that language could mean that any small legal flaw would nullify the entire law.

Fritchey said working on the measure was the “worst experience” of his legislative career. He said the proposal inspired people to lie, spew hatred and even make death threats.

From Lee Newspapers

All central Illinois lawmakers voted against the legislation… All Southern Illinois lawmakers voted against the legislation.

Thoughts?

- Posted by Rich Miller        

18 Comments
  1. - Wumpus - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 9:00 am:

    Common sense loses again. No parental/adult notification for minors? How silly. Except for the rare extreme cases, this should be a slam dunk for common sense.


  2. - Pat Collins - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 9:11 am:

    All central Illinois lawmakers voted against the legislation… All Southern Illinois lawmakers voted against the legislation.

    Maybe the first sign of “payback” on electric rates? I have to think this is considered a “Chicago thing” downstate.

    characterize any of us as pro-abortion,” said state Rep. Rosemary Mulligan

    Pegging the irony meter, aren’t we?


  3. - Anonymous - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 9:13 am:

    Correction - There will be parental notification later this year when the 1995 Parental Notification Act is finally enforced. Yesterdays vote was to prevent it from being watered down.


  4. - Levois - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 10:19 am:

    I think it’s incredibly sad that people can’t disagree on an issue without resorting to death threats.


  5. - cermak_rd - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 10:44 am:

    I doubt this law will ever actually be “enforced”! I can’t imagine the cops will have the time, in Cook County anyway, to actually bother with it. And the clinics are covered as long as the person holds ID that shows they are of age. If young adults are able to get fake IDs for drinking, who thinks they won’t for abortions? Abortions cost a bit more than a 6-pack too so the added expense of a fake ID isn’t going to hurt that much.

    One of the reasons that girls are reluctant to inform their parents is becuase they fear their money being taken from them, which would leave them unable to acquire the abortion. Another is they fear the parents will refuse to fund their college or beat them or simply refuse to acknowledge their existence if they actually go through with the abortion (it’s notification, not permission). Perhaps if their parents had a better relationship with them, they wouldn’t have these fears and would voluntarily inform their parents.


  6. - Team Sleep - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 11:33 am:

    I dunno, cermak; you paint a pretty bleak picture. Since when do parents not have a reign over their children’s lives? I’m not saying that parents should control their kids completely, but taking them out of the equation is fairly disrespectful. It’s no wonder that kids in the current generation are brats at school and awful at home. I would hate to be a teacher in any K-12 school and I would even hate to have an advocacy or child assistance job. Things like this just add to the poor approach that society in general takes towards our youth.


  7. - NI80 - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 12:02 pm:

    What Fritchey wanted to do was provide young women with some options. Unfortunately, some legislators did not feel it necessary to have the insight to do the same.


  8. - Truthful James - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 12:15 pm:

    John F. is an honorable man. I trust he believes that the functioning family is the most effective and efficient unit of governance in society — not perfect, but the best one available.

    If abstinence is to stand a chance, there must be the right of the parent to be knowing about the behaviour of its unemancipated children.

    All of the arguments placed against notification are straw men. IMHO this whole legislation is designed to strengthen Planned Parenthood and weaken the family. Following that will be an acceleration to a statist government as oposed to a free society.


  9. - Skeeter - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 12:20 pm:

    Truthful,

    Let me get this right — allowing minors to act on their own will lead to a BIGGER government?

    According to you, less control over minors will lead to a less free society?

    Is “up” actually “down” in your language?


  10. - Truthful James - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 12:32 pm:

    You have got it, madam. It is either the State or it is the family. Come down on one side or the other. You opt for the former.

    Every time we strip authority and responsibility away from the family, state (generic term for all formal levels of government) programs have to be put in place. Look at all the public functions a family performs within its boundaries — free of charge, I might add.

    The key word, Madam, is “un-emancipated” minors.


  11. - Skeeter - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 12:47 pm:

    How about the individual? The individual has no rights?

    Under your system of “liberty” can a wife disobey a husband? Can a wife leave a husband? Who has final say: The “family” or the individual?

    Nice concept of liberty you have there.


  12. - Truthful James - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 1:26 pm:

    Madam, what part of “un-emancipated minor” do you not understand?

    What bloviating you go through with your ultra stupid questions in an effort to justify your position.

    Of course adults may disobey each other (there may be consequences for the family if they do, but this will be — by adults taken into account.

    Of course free people have the right to enter into a family relationship and leave.

    What a high level of bluster you present.

    One hopes that the family has had some effect on the actions of the individual members. Perhaps they might (oh, shock and dismay) might teach them a moral code strong enough to withstand societal pressures to conform elsewise. Upon emancipation, individuals should have been well armed to participate in society. (No, madam, I did not mean guns.)

    Madam, nobody is in the least trying to take away your belief system. Neither should you expect anybody to conform with yours.


  13. - Skeeter - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 1:41 pm:

    TJ,

    Where you trying to make a point? Somehow it got lost in all the weird titles and insults. Let’s hope you don’t take it out on your child, Madam.

    That being said, you appear to be focused on the “minor” issue.

    According to you, then, a parent has the right to beat a child. According to you, a parent has a right to sell that child into slavery.

    Is that really your point?

    You don’t think the government has any role whatsoever in protecting minors?

    We will have to disagree on that point, Madam.


  14. - Truthful James - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 1:48 pm:

    More bloviating as you extend the field of srgument beyond the rational.

    I had heard — vaguely, I must say — that slavery was outlawed. Unless you are referring to adoption, which is legal.

    As for child beating, there are legal boundaries, of course.

    What could possibly be your point in bringing these blunderbusses to bear within the context of parental notification?


  15. - Skeeter - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 1:53 pm:

    “Bloviating.”

    Good word. You don’t hear that word very often. How creative. You must be well educated.

    But I digress.

    In any case, your most recent post confuses me.

    Are you claiming now that The Government CAN regulate the interactions within a family, even when it concerns a minor?

    That’s “statism”, isn’t it?

    As you said, “Every time we strip authority and responsibility away from the family, state (generic term for all formal levels of government) programs have to be put in place.”

    We can’t have that, can we?

    I assume that you are going to march on Springfield to return the family to its proper place, Madam.


  16. - Cal Skinner - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 2:17 pm:

    The existing law is extremely weak, as is explained in links from my story on Illinoize and McHenry County Blog.


  17. - T.J. - Friday, Apr 27, 07 @ 8:08 pm:

    “I’m her father … and I should know about it,” said state Rep. Robert Molaro, a Chicago Democrat and the father of three teen daughters, who voted against the plan.

    Color me amazed a Chicago Democrat voted against it. Maybe there is hope.


  18. - NoGiftsPlease - Saturday, Apr 28, 07 @ 6:35 pm:

    If this is all about protecting the health and safety of the girl, why not notify her physician? Or maybe pass a law for calling the nurse at the clinic the next day even have a follow up visit? A physician would seem the logical choice to protect the health of the girl. If any of these were being discussed, I might be convinced this is about health and safety. I suspect that this is more about making sure the girl suffers appropriately for her sin than anything else.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Open thread and another LSSI reminder
* In defense of Mary Todd Lincoln on her 200th birthday
* Caption contest!
* Rauner says he'll file end of term report, clear clemency backlog
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Pritzker roundup
* Cook County Public Guardian sues DCFS: "Abject moral and human rights failure"
* Mendoza signature clearance rate is high during first round
* Your holiday season moment of Zen
* Pritzker criticized over lack of Active Transportation Alliance members on his transition committee
* Color me skeptical
* Pritzker heading to White House today
* Sen. Schimpf wants Satanic sculpture removed from rotunda as Rep. Bryant introduces condemnation resolution
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller